
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


You’ve probably heard we share 98% of our DNA with chimps, our supposed closest living relatives.
But that 98% number has a lot of problems. It’s based off old data that used human DNA as a framework because the researchers assumed common ancestry. When a true ape-only genome was sequenced, the number of similarities dropped dramatically to only about 85% similar.
This similarity in DNA doesn’t suggest a common ancestor. In the same way a computer programmer uses the same basic commands to design many different programs, the Creator used the same basic instructions to code for a variety of different organisms.
By Ken Ham and Mark Looy4.6
374374 ratings
You’ve probably heard we share 98% of our DNA with chimps, our supposed closest living relatives.
But that 98% number has a lot of problems. It’s based off old data that used human DNA as a framework because the researchers assumed common ancestry. When a true ape-only genome was sequenced, the number of similarities dropped dramatically to only about 85% similar.
This similarity in DNA doesn’t suggest a common ancestor. In the same way a computer programmer uses the same basic commands to design many different programs, the Creator used the same basic instructions to code for a variety of different organisms.

5,211 Listeners

2,598 Listeners

1,518 Listeners

175 Listeners

1,038 Listeners

3,156 Listeners

2,887 Listeners

5,464 Listeners

5,373 Listeners

1,547 Listeners

2,488 Listeners

953 Listeners

386 Listeners

2,928 Listeners

13,245 Listeners