
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


You’ve probably heard we share 98% of our DNA with chimps, our supposed closest living relatives.
But that 98% number has a lot of problems. It’s based off old data that used human DNA as a framework because the researchers assumed common ancestry. When a true ape-only genome was sequenced, the number of similarities dropped dramatically to only about 85% similar.
This similarity in DNA doesn’t suggest a common ancestor. In the same way a computer programmer uses the same basic commands to design many different programs, the Creator used the same basic instructions to code for a variety of different organisms.
By Ken Ham and Mark Looy4.6
374374 ratings
You’ve probably heard we share 98% of our DNA with chimps, our supposed closest living relatives.
But that 98% number has a lot of problems. It’s based off old data that used human DNA as a framework because the researchers assumed common ancestry. When a true ape-only genome was sequenced, the number of similarities dropped dramatically to only about 85% similar.
This similarity in DNA doesn’t suggest a common ancestor. In the same way a computer programmer uses the same basic commands to design many different programs, the Creator used the same basic instructions to code for a variety of different organisms.

5,230 Listeners

2,702 Listeners

1,527 Listeners

188 Listeners

1,050 Listeners

3,150 Listeners

2,911 Listeners

5,430 Listeners

5,375 Listeners

1,556 Listeners

2,474 Listeners

939 Listeners

390 Listeners

2,936 Listeners

13,188 Listeners