Sponsored by EasyDNS
https://easydns.com/NotOnRecord
๐นShort Description:
๐ EP#181 Joseph and Alper Yulmaz contrast Canadaโs self-defence (s.34) with U.S. castle doctrineโno duty to retreat, proportionality/necessity, and the modified objective test for homeowners. โ๏ธ๐ข๐๏ธ
๐Meta Description:
๐ข In EP#181 Not On Record explains Canadaโs self-defence s.34 vs U.S. castle doctrineโno duty to retreat, proportionality, stand-your-ground myths, and how courts assess reasonableness. ๐ง๐งโโ๏ธ๐
|Not On Record
๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐!
โถ If you enjoy this video, please like it and share it.
โถ Don't forget to subscribe to this channel for more updates.
โถ Subscribe now: https://www.youtube.com/@NotOnRecord?sub_confirmation=1
โ ๏ธ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐: We do not accept any liability for any loss or damage incurred from you acting or not acting as a result of watching any of my publications. You acknowledge that you use the information I provide at your own risk. do your own research.
โ๏ธ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐: This video and my YouTube channel contain dialog, music, and image that are property of " Not On Record " You are authorized to share the video link and channel and embed this video in your website or others as long as a link back to my YouTube Channel is provided
@NotOnRecord
โถ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐:- #ep176 #notonrecord #hockeycanadatrial #hockeycanada #trialverdict #sportsandjustice #courtroomanalysis #legalpodcast #truecrimepodcast #canadianjustice #athletesandaccountability #legalverdict #sportslaw #highprofiletrial #realcasebreakdown #legalcommentary #truthandjustice #courtroomdrama #canadianlegalnews #justiceinspotlight #sportscontroversy #legaldiscussion #lawandorderpodcast #consentinsports #hockeynews2025 #legalanalysis #justiceforvictims #publicreaction #caseverdict #crimeandlaw #sportsintegrity
Please share with your friends and family. Also don't forget to like, subscribe, and hit the notification bell to notify you if I post a new video. Much love and God bless
Sponsored by EasyDNS https://easydns.com/NotOnRecord
In this episode Joseph walks through Canadaโs self-defence law (Criminal Code s.34) and contrasts it with U.S. โcastle doctrineโ and stand-your-ground frameworks. With articling student Alper Yulmaz joining, they unpack proportionality and necessity, why Canada has no duty to retreat yet still weighs available options, and how courts apply a modified subjective objective test, considering the accusedโs size, experience, trauma history, and the context inside a home. Recent tragedies and high-profile charges are discussed without trial-by-media, along with Supreme Court guidance (e.g., Hodgson, Khill), to show that Canadian law is broader and more flexible than many think; designed to protect homeowners while avoiding blanket presumptions that can produce unjust outcomes.
R. v. Hodgson, 2024 SCC 25 - https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2024/2024canlii11123/2024canlii11123.html?resultId=faf026722dfb4b3a9e3dc803930bbd9b&searchId=2025-09-07T08:08:30:114/750c412190cc49eba6030d6a4fba89fa
R. v. Khill, 2021 SCC 37 (CanLII), [2021] 2 SCR 948 - https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2021/2021scc37/2021scc37.html?resultId=106af67b2fdf4afd82ff35a092a71ebc&searchId=2025-09-07T08:11:40:226/e117a95adc244d88b9ab89e6f5053778