On Episode 33, we tell you about a concerning new British Columbia law that will make it easy for governments to sue companies for products that may cause harm to health; we walk you through a fascinating decision overturning a portion of an Ontario law aimed at keeping animal rights activists from filming on farms; plus we share our Bad Legal Takes of the Week.

Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:

• B.C. business groups say legislation to sue social media companied is too broad
• B.C. takes action to hold companies accountable for hurting people
• The Much Broader Future of Cost Recovery Litigation in British Columbia
• Business Association Letter: Concerns on Scope of Bill 12
• Couple fights to rid Toronto home of heritage status
• Canada Tonight interview with Niagara Falls mayor about eclipse state of emergency
• ‘We had to challenge it’: How animal-rights groups fought Ontario’s Bill 156 and (mostly) won
• Court strikes down laws restricting investigations by animal rights activists into animal cruelty
• Animal Justice et al. v A.G of Ontario, 2024 ONSC 1753 (CanLII)

Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.

The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.

On Episode 32, we tell you about secretive plans in Waterloo Region to expropriate farmland; we explain the new Supreme Court of Canada decision that says Charter rights may sometimes yield to Indigenous rights; and we explain why declaring an emergency for a solar eclipse in Niagara Region is not only misguided but unlawful.

Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:

• Wilmot Township farmers prepare to fight back after Region of Waterloo plans to expropriate land
• Opinion: Online Harms Act focuses on the wrong end of the problem
• 'It's going to be crazy:' Niagara Falls mayor says city preparing for up to 1 million visitors for solar eclipse
• Niagara police begin public safety plans for million expected to view solar eclipse
• Kitchener developer made offers on six Wilmot farms a month before the region
• Christine Van Geyn: A solar eclipse is not an emergency and declaring it one is unlawful
• Dickson v. Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation, 2024 SCC 10
• Joanna Baron: Supreme Court confirms that the Charter applies to Indigenous governments—except when it doesn’t
• 'Nonsense:' Ford slams lawsuits filed by Ontario school boards against social media platforms

Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.

The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.

On Episode 31, we tell you about the firing of an Ontario librarian whose apparent crime was trying to diversify the collection; we walk you through a heart-breaking decision by a Calgary judge to allow a woman with autism to access assisted-death over her father's objections, and we share our new polling that shows Canadians are ready for major change on health care.

Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:

• Most Canadians want ‘major changes’ to healthcare system new research finds
• Calgary judge rules woman with autism can seek Medical Assistance in Dying
• Premier Ford clarifies fourplex comments despite insisting it would be a ‘disaster’
• Niagara-on-the-Lake library board fires CEO Cathy Simpson
• Monica Harris: The unjust firing of Ontario librarian who challenged DEI orthodoxy
• Hermes faces US lawsuit over ‘refusal’ to sell Birkin bag
• Manitoba PCs say bill banning anti-abortion protests near clinics should be expanded

Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.

The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.

On Episode 30, we explain why a proposed bylaw in Vaughan aimed at controlling hateful protests outside synagogues raises red flags; we explain the costs order made against an activist group defending dangerous encampments in Edmonton; plus we share our Bad Legal Takes of the Week.

Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:

• Advocacy group to pay City of Edmonton more than $11K in costs after failed encampment lawsuit
• Section 176(2) of the Criminal Code
• Vaughan mayor seeks to ban protests at schools, religious institutions
• Protecting Vaughan’s places of worship, schools, childcare facilities and our hospital (Vaughan news release)
• Westendorp v. the Queen, 1983 CanLII 1 (SCC)
• Coalition for Justice and Human Rights Ltd v Edmonton (City), 2024 ABKB 148 (CanLII)
• Kingston to start enforcing daytime camping ban in city parks
• The Supreme Court of Canada went viral for what it didn’t say about ‘a woman’
• A Q&A with U of T’s new adviser on civil discourse, Randy Boyagoda

Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.

The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.

On Episode 29, we tell you about a labour arbitrator decision that found a vaccine mandate that led to 10 nurses being fired from their jobs was unreasonable; we go through the Supreme Court decision that found the state needs judicial authorization to get your Internet Protocol address; and we tell you about a proposed bylaw that would ban "graphic" anti-abortion signs.

Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:

• City council votes to move ahead with ban on graphic protest signs
• R. v. Bykovets
• Police need search warrant to get IP address, rules Supreme Court of Canada in 5-4 split decision
• Online sex abuse: Accused Ontario med student avoids extradition to U.S.
• Arbitrator rules in favour of Ont. nurses fired for refusing COVID vaccines
• Quinte Health v Ontario Nurses Association, 2024 CanLII 14991 (ON LA)

Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.

The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.

On Episode 28, we give you an update on the criminal charges dropped against two men arrested at Coutts, Alberta in February 2022, and the civil lawsuits launched by trucker convoy participants; we explain the ruling that says Quebec's secularism law Bill 21 is fully shielded from judicial review by the notwithstanding clause; and we explain the interesting inter-provincial trade angle in a lawsuit from McGill and Concordia against the province's tuition structure.

Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:

• The HateGate Affair: Unmasking Canada's Hate Industry (by Caryma S'ad)
• Gwyn Morgan: Truckers get jail time while real criminals get bail and parole
• 'Freedom Convoy' organizer from Sask. suing federal government for using Emergencies Act to freeze accounts
• Quebec Appeal Court Bill 21 ruling fuels debate on notwithstanding clause
• McGill, Concordia file lawsuits demanding Quebec cancel tuition hike
• Palestinian Canadians sue Foreign Minister Joly over arms exports to Israel
• MANDEL: Luka Magnotta now in same medium-security prison as fellow killer Paul Bernardo

Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.

The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.

On Episode 27, we do a deep dive into the new Online Harms Act, introduced this week as Bill C-63. The act would create a Digital Safety Commission, increase the penalties for criminal hate speech, allow judges to impose peace bonds on people who might commit hate speech in the future, and empower the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal to fine people up to $50,000 for discriminatory speech.

Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:

• An Act to enact the Online Harms Act (Bill C-63)
• Online harms bill’s proposed changes risk silencing free speech, experts warn
• One cheer for the new Online Harms Act (Andrew Coyne)
• CCF concerned by Online Harms Act
• Keaan Bexte tweet
• Joanna Baron: The government doubles down on censoring the internet

Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.

The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.

On Episode 26, we tell you about the debate over whether the judge hearing the challenge to the Saskatchewan gender pronouns policy is allowed to make a declaration now that the notwithstanding clause has been invoked; we explain our application to intervene in the federal plastics appeal; and we tell you what we've heard about the upcoming "online harms" and hate speech bill.

Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:

• Disinformation Law Is Dead
•  Dérives sectaires : on vous explique le délit de "provocation à l'abstention de soins", voté par l'Assemblée nationale
• Yes, the feds can actually override provincial anti-trans school policies. Here's how.
• School closures may not have been necessary to prevent spread of COVID-19, researchers at McMaster find
• Can job postings in Canada exclude white people? Short answer: yes
• Judge rules challenge of Saskatchewan’s pronoun law can proceed
• Josh Dehaas: P.E.I. puts politeness over free speech by persecuting town councillor
• The Evolving Debate Over Section 33 of the Charter
•  The faulty received wisdom around the notwithstanding clause
• The Notwithstanding Clause: Legislatures, Courts, and the Electorate
• The Truck and the Brakes: Understanding the Charter's Limitations and Notwithstanding Clauses Symmetrically

Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.

The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.

On Episode 25, we explain why last week's Supreme Court decision on Indigenous child welfare preserves an important constitutional principle; we walk you through the Federal Court's feisty opinion declaring that cabinet is breaching a constitutional convention by not appointing enough judges; and we discuss our theories on why the Supreme Court is deciding so few cases these days.

Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:

• Reference re An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families
• Two more provinces join in opposition to gun buyback program that 'unnecessarily targets lawful gun owners'
• Hameed v. Canada (Prime Minister) (Federal Court decision on judicial vacancies)
• Federal Court rules Ottawa failed constitutional duty to fill judicial vacancies
• SCC’s output fell to 34 judgments in 2023, renewing questions, concerns within the bar
• Judge overturns convictions of B.C. woman, accused of coughing on grocery worker
• Christine's tweet about the CBC Kids story on Emergencies Act decision
• Paul Champ's tweet criticizing the Ottawa Police Service

Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.

The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.

On Episode 24, we tell you about a Montreal police officer who says he was demoted for an anonymous $20 donation to the Freedom Convoy; we explain the Supreme Court decision that found Ontario Premier Doug Ford was not required to give CBC his mandate letters; and we tell you about Supreme Court Judge Malcolm Rowe's provocative speech at the Runnymede Society conference.

Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:

• Windsor police officer appeals conviction for donating to Freedom Convoy
• Hub Exclusive: Supreme Court Justice Malcolm Rowe on postmodernism, democracy, and judicial overreach
•  Un cadre du SPVM s’estime lésé après un don au Convoi de la liberté
• Écarté pour un don au mouvement des camionneurs
• Ontario (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Information and Privacy Commissioner)
• Supreme Court rules Premier Doug Ford's mandate letters to be kept secret
• Jennifer Koshan tweet
• Exploring the Link between Crime and Socio-Economic Status in Ottawa and Saskatoon: A Small-Area Geographical Analysis
• The Scourge of His Convictions (David Moscrop)
• Nora Loreto tweet

Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.

The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.