We get an update from Bill from New Hampshire, who runs Twin Mountain Country Store, on his recent bout in legal-land related to his long-outstanding bureaucratic legal-attack. This one is for those pseudo-critics that falsely assert we don’t report the courtroom train-wrecks along with the success stories. JT joins later in the podcast for a weekly recap and a walkabout down memory lane.
Show Notes:
Ray Persinger and Rudy Ogden‘s long history of legal-attacks on non-violent opinion-violators despite their failure to meet their burden-of-proof to produce evidence to prove their laws and codes apply.
Conflicting positions, opinions, and rulings from New Hampshire’s attorneys.
Judges that are so eager to sustain an objection that they don’t even care to hear the grounds for the basis of the objection from their prosecutor teammate in their outcome-based proceedings.
The judge backtracks from his prior affirmation that the defendant is innocent of all elements of the charges, including jurisdiction, after realizing how his determinations will conflict with the prosecution’s burden-of-proof.
The judge is allowing the prosecutor to argue without evidence to prove jurisdiction.
If jurisdiction is a ‘purely theoretical issue of law‘ and has nothing to do with facts, then why are they hung up on the fact of your physical location to determine jurisdiction in the first place if it is ‘purely a theoretical issue‘?
The nightmare of the involuntary compliance with licenses, permits, and other statist demands while they argue your voluntary consent is the license, permit, etc.
The judge stonewalling the defendant when asking about the prosecutions burden to produce the evidence in question.
Even some of the worst statists will admit that if a regular person did the same things government does then it would be considered criminal absent the sanction of the STATE.
The hearing officer denied cross-examination after realizing where the line-of-questioning was leading towards.
Recounting Rebecka’s success in getting the witness (the cop) declared incompetent to make legal determinations resulting in an acquittal from the jury.
“Never argue merit when there’s a flawed premise.” -Gary Capps
During Bill’s closing arguments, the judge ordered him not to raise the issue of the prosecution’s failure to provide evidence to prove jurisdiction.
The bureaucratic octopus of control and domination over their “subjects” through permits and licenses.
The castle-dweller’s growing list of executions of village-dwelling “tax protesters.”
Malcolm X – The House Negro and the Field Negro.
Self-emancipation via “No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority.”
How to discover the boundaries of your freedom and your oppressor’s tyranny.
Christopher Hitchen’s contradiction of Hitchen’s razor when he goes off supporting a war without justifiable evidence.
“Truth is not determined by how many people agree with you.”
Marc’s television appearance on “The Hidden Truth” with Aagie Nost in Tuscon.
We are a morally dissonant society because of our conditioned culture of institutional violence and countering it with nonviolent noncooperation and operating as much of you life as you can outside of their system.
Zeroing-in on the agent’s assessment that the defendant actually believed they had an obligation to submit to extortion.
The straw-man and red herring diversions you get when you begin to make an effective defense against their bureaucratic legal-attacks.
Catching contradictions from the prosecution team (the prosecutor and judge [co-prosecutor {or sometimes lead prosecutor}]) in the courtroom when you use effective Socratic questioning.
Tait’s success story in Wisconsin: when the judge ordered the prosecutor to respond to the motion to dismiss and discovery request, and [...]
