The High Court Report

Opinion Summary: A.A.R.P. v. Trump | Case No. 24A1007 | Date Decided: 5/16/25


Listen Later

Case Info: A.A.R.P. v. Trump, Case No. 24A1007 | Date Decided: 5/16/25

Link to Docket: Here.

Question Presented: Whether Venezuelan nationals detained as alleged members of a terrorist organization are entitled to constitutionally adequate notice and opportunity to challenge their removal before being deported under the Alien Enemies Act, and if so, what minimum notice requirements must the government provide to satisfy due process.

Plain Language Breakdown:

In this case, the Supreme Court decided that Venezuelan nationals detained by the government as alleged members of a terrorist organization must receive adequate notice before being removed from the United States under the Alien Enemies Act. The Court found that the District Court's inaction for over 14 hours constituted a constructive denial of the detainees' request for emergency relief, and that due process requires notice that allows detainees a meaningful opportunity to challenge their removal through habeas proceedings. The Court vacated the Fifth Circuit's dismissal of the appeal and granted an injunction preventing the government from removing class members until the Fifth Circuit could determine what level of notice is constitutionally required.

Justice Kavanaugh concurred, agreeing with the temporary injunction but expressing a preference for the Supreme Court to resolve the critical legal issues promptly rather than remanding to lower courts.

Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, dissented, arguing that the Court lacked jurisdiction because the District Court's actions were reasonable given the circumstances and insufficient evidence was presented to prove imminent harm to the detainees; he also questioned whether class relief could be obtained in habeas proceedings and whether the requirements for class certification could be met in this case.

Voting Details: The Supreme Court delivered a Per Curiam opinion. Justice Kavanaugh wrote a concurring opinion. Justice Alito wrote a dissenting opinion, with whom Justice Thomas joined.

Link to Opinion: Here.

Timestamps:

00:00 Introduction and Plain Language Breakdown

02:10 Summary of Per Curiam Opinion

12:47 Summary of Justice Kavanaugh Concurring Opinion

14:33 Summary of Justice Kavanaugh Dissenting Opinion

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

The High Court ReportBy SCOTUS Oral Arguments

  • 4.3
  • 4.3
  • 4.3
  • 4.3
  • 4.3

4.3

6 ratings


More shows like The High Court Report

View all
The NPR Politics Podcast by NPR

The NPR Politics Podcast

25,861 Listeners

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts by Slate Podcasts

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

3,538 Listeners

Bloomberg Law by Bloomberg

Bloomberg Law

373 Listeners

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke by The Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke

696 Listeners

We the People by National Constitution Center

We the People

1,119 Listeners

The Fifth Column by Kmele Foster, Michael Moynihan, and Matt Welch

The Fifth Column

2,892 Listeners

The Lawfare Podcast by The Lawfare Institute

The Lawfare Podcast

6,295 Listeners

The Daily by The New York Times

The Daily

112,574 Listeners

Stay Tuned with Preet by Preet Bharara

Stay Tuned with Preet

32,370 Listeners

Today, Explained by Vox

Today, Explained

10,238 Listeners

Interesting Times with Ross Douthat by New York Times Opinion

Interesting Times with Ross Douthat

7,070 Listeners

Strict Scrutiny by Crooked Media

Strict Scrutiny

5,758 Listeners

Advisory Opinions by The Dispatch

Advisory Opinions

3,868 Listeners

The Ezra Klein Show by New York Times Opinion

The Ezra Klein Show

16,082 Listeners

Divided Argument by Will Baude, Dan Epps

Divided Argument

738 Listeners