
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
The question presented in this case is: Whether and if so to what extent does a former President enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office.
The Supreme Court held: Under our constitutional structure of separated powers, the nature of Presidential power entitles a former President to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority. And he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts. There is no immunity for unofficial acts.
TIMESTAMPS:
00:00 Introduction
00:14 Question Presented
00:30 Voting Breakdown
01:10 Chief Justice Roberts Majority Opinion
02:08 Holding
21:32 Justice Thomas Concurring Opinion
23:48 Justice Barrett Opinion Concurring in Part
28:59 Justice Sotomayor Dissenting Opinion
38:40 Justice Jackson Dissenting Opinion
5
33 ratings
The question presented in this case is: Whether and if so to what extent does a former President enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office.
The Supreme Court held: Under our constitutional structure of separated powers, the nature of Presidential power entitles a former President to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority. And he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts. There is no immunity for unofficial acts.
TIMESTAMPS:
00:00 Introduction
00:14 Question Presented
00:30 Voting Breakdown
01:10 Chief Justice Roberts Majority Opinion
02:08 Holding
21:32 Justice Thomas Concurring Opinion
23:48 Justice Barrett Opinion Concurring in Part
28:59 Justice Sotomayor Dissenting Opinion
38:40 Justice Jackson Dissenting Opinion