
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Oral Argument: Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC | Case No. 23-51 | Date Argued: 2/20/24 | Date Decided: 4/12/24
Link to Docket: Here.
Background:
The Federal Arbitration Act exempts the "contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce." 9 U.S.C. § 1. The First and Seventh Circuits have held that this exemption applies to any member of a class of workers that is engaged in foreign or interstate commerce in the same way as seamen and railroad employees-that is, any worker "actively engaged" in the interstate transportation of goods. The Second and Eleventh Circuits have added an additional requirement: The worker's employer must also be in the "transportation industry."
Question Presented: To be exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act, must a class of workers that is actively engaged in interstate transportation also be employed by a company in the transportation industry?
Holding: A transportation worker need not work in the transportation industry to be exempt from coverage under Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act.
Result: Vacated and remanded.
Voting Breakdown: 9-0. Chief Justice Roberts delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Link to Opinion: Here.
Oral Advocates:
By SCOTUS Oral Arguments4.3
66 ratings
Oral Argument: Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC | Case No. 23-51 | Date Argued: 2/20/24 | Date Decided: 4/12/24
Link to Docket: Here.
Background:
The Federal Arbitration Act exempts the "contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce." 9 U.S.C. § 1. The First and Seventh Circuits have held that this exemption applies to any member of a class of workers that is engaged in foreign or interstate commerce in the same way as seamen and railroad employees-that is, any worker "actively engaged" in the interstate transportation of goods. The Second and Eleventh Circuits have added an additional requirement: The worker's employer must also be in the "transportation industry."
Question Presented: To be exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act, must a class of workers that is actively engaged in interstate transportation also be employed by a company in the transportation industry?
Holding: A transportation worker need not work in the transportation industry to be exempt from coverage under Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act.
Result: Vacated and remanded.
Voting Breakdown: 9-0. Chief Justice Roberts delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Link to Opinion: Here.
Oral Advocates:

25,862 Listeners

3,541 Listeners

373 Listeners

696 Listeners

1,119 Listeners

2,890 Listeners

6,297 Listeners

112,597 Listeners

32,367 Listeners

10,241 Listeners

7,067 Listeners

5,772 Listeners

3,883 Listeners

16,097 Listeners

738 Listeners