
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Case Info: Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc. | Case No. 23-900 | Date Argued: 12/11/24 | Date Decided: 2/26/25
Link to Docket: Here.
Question Presented: Whether an award of the "defendant's profits" under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), can include an order for the defendant to disgorge the distinct profits of legally separate non-party corporate affiliates.
Holding: In awarding the “defendant’s profits” to the prevailing plaintiff in a trademark infringement suit under the Lanham Act, §1117(a), a court can award only profits ascribable to the “defendant” itself. And the term “defendant” bears its usual legal meaning: the party against whom relief or recovery is sought—here, Dewberry Group. The Engineers chose not to add the Group’s affiliates as defendants. Accordingly, the affiliates’ profits are not the (statutorily disgorgable) “defendant’s profits” as ordinarily understood.
Result: Vacated and remanded.
Voting Breakdown: Justice Kagan delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Justice Sotomayor filed a concurring opinion.
Link to Opinion: Here.
Oral Advocates:
Website Link to Opinion Summary: Here.
Apple Podcast Link to Opinion Summary: Here.
By SCOTUS Oral Arguments4.3
66 ratings
Case Info: Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc. | Case No. 23-900 | Date Argued: 12/11/24 | Date Decided: 2/26/25
Link to Docket: Here.
Question Presented: Whether an award of the "defendant's profits" under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), can include an order for the defendant to disgorge the distinct profits of legally separate non-party corporate affiliates.
Holding: In awarding the “defendant’s profits” to the prevailing plaintiff in a trademark infringement suit under the Lanham Act, §1117(a), a court can award only profits ascribable to the “defendant” itself. And the term “defendant” bears its usual legal meaning: the party against whom relief or recovery is sought—here, Dewberry Group. The Engineers chose not to add the Group’s affiliates as defendants. Accordingly, the affiliates’ profits are not the (statutorily disgorgable) “defendant’s profits” as ordinarily understood.
Result: Vacated and remanded.
Voting Breakdown: Justice Kagan delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Justice Sotomayor filed a concurring opinion.
Link to Opinion: Here.
Oral Advocates:
Website Link to Opinion Summary: Here.
Apple Podcast Link to Opinion Summary: Here.

25,866 Listeners

3,528 Listeners

373 Listeners

690 Listeners

1,118 Listeners

2,887 Listeners

6,299 Listeners

112,734 Listeners

32,379 Listeners

10,271 Listeners

7,165 Listeners

5,774 Listeners

3,883 Listeners

16,053 Listeners

737 Listeners