
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Oral Argument: McIntosh v. United States | Case No. 22-7386 | Date Argued: 2/27/24 | Date Decided: 4/17/24
Link to Docket: Here.
Question Presented: Whether a district court may enter a criminal forfeiture order outside the time limitations set forth in Rule 32.2, Fed.R.Crim.P.?
Holding: A district court's failure to comply with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(b)(2)(B)'s requirement to enter a preliminary order imposing criminal forfeiture before sentencing does not bar a judge from ordering forfeiture at sentencing subject to harmless-error principles on appellate review.
Result: Affirmed.
Voting Breakdown: 9-0. Justice Sotomayor delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Link to Opinion: Here.
Oral Advocates:
By SCOTUS Oral Arguments4.3
66 ratings
Oral Argument: McIntosh v. United States | Case No. 22-7386 | Date Argued: 2/27/24 | Date Decided: 4/17/24
Link to Docket: Here.
Question Presented: Whether a district court may enter a criminal forfeiture order outside the time limitations set forth in Rule 32.2, Fed.R.Crim.P.?
Holding: A district court's failure to comply with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(b)(2)(B)'s requirement to enter a preliminary order imposing criminal forfeiture before sentencing does not bar a judge from ordering forfeiture at sentencing subject to harmless-error principles on appellate review.
Result: Affirmed.
Voting Breakdown: 9-0. Justice Sotomayor delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Link to Opinion: Here.
Oral Advocates:

25,862 Listeners

3,541 Listeners

373 Listeners

696 Listeners

1,119 Listeners

2,890 Listeners

6,297 Listeners

112,597 Listeners

32,367 Listeners

10,241 Listeners

7,067 Listeners

5,772 Listeners

3,883 Listeners

16,097 Listeners

738 Listeners