
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Oral Argument: Postal Service v. Konan | Case No. 24-351 | Oral Argument Date: 10/8/25
Link to Docket: Here
Case Preview: Here
Background: The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), ch. 753, 60 Stat. 842 (28 U.S.C. 1346(b), 2671 et seq .), generally waives the United States' sovereign immunity for suits seeking damages "for injury or loss of property, or personal injury or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission" of an employee of the federal government "under circumstances where the United States, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred." 28 U.S.C. 1346(b)(1). The FTCA, however, excepts from that waiver of immunity "[a]ny claim arising out of the loss, miscarriage, or negligent transmission of letters or postal matter." 28 U.S.C. 2680(b).
Question Presented: Whether a plaintiff's claim that she and her tenants did not receive mail because Postal Service employees intentionally did not deliver it to a designated address arises out of "the loss" or "miscarriage" of letters or postal matter. 28 U.S.C. 2680(b).
Oral Advocates:
Link to Opinion: TBD.
Website Link to Opinion Summary: TBD.
Website Link to Oral Argument: TBD.
Timestamps:
By SCOTUS Oral Arguments4.3
66 ratings
Oral Argument: Postal Service v. Konan | Case No. 24-351 | Oral Argument Date: 10/8/25
Link to Docket: Here
Case Preview: Here
Background: The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), ch. 753, 60 Stat. 842 (28 U.S.C. 1346(b), 2671 et seq .), generally waives the United States' sovereign immunity for suits seeking damages "for injury or loss of property, or personal injury or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission" of an employee of the federal government "under circumstances where the United States, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred." 28 U.S.C. 1346(b)(1). The FTCA, however, excepts from that waiver of immunity "[a]ny claim arising out of the loss, miscarriage, or negligent transmission of letters or postal matter." 28 U.S.C. 2680(b).
Question Presented: Whether a plaintiff's claim that she and her tenants did not receive mail because Postal Service employees intentionally did not deliver it to a designated address arises out of "the loss" or "miscarriage" of letters or postal matter. 28 U.S.C. 2680(b).
Oral Advocates:
Link to Opinion: TBD.
Website Link to Opinion Summary: TBD.
Website Link to Oral Argument: TBD.
Timestamps:

25,861 Listeners

3,538 Listeners

373 Listeners

696 Listeners

1,119 Listeners

2,892 Listeners

6,295 Listeners

112,574 Listeners

32,370 Listeners

10,238 Listeners

7,070 Listeners

5,758 Listeners

3,868 Listeners

16,082 Listeners

738 Listeners