Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Oral Argument: United States v. Skrmetti | Case No. 23-477 | Date Argued: 12/4/24
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Oral Argument: United States v. Skrmetti | Case No. 23-477 | Date Argued: 12/4/24
Case Info: United States v. Skrmetti | Case No. 23-477 | Date Argued: 12/4/24
Link to Docket: Here.
Question Presented: Whether Tennessee Senate Bill 1 (SBl), which prohibits all medical treatments intended to allow "a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor's sex" or to treat "purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor's sex and asserted identity," Tenn. Code Ann. § 68-33-103(a)(1), violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Oral Advocates:
- For petitioner: Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.
- For respondents L.W., et al. supporting petitioner: Chase B. Strangio, New York, N. Y.
- For respondents Jonathan Skrmetti, et al.: J. Matthew Rice, Solicitor General, Nashville, Tenn.
View all episodes
By SCOTUS Oral Arguments
5
22 ratings
Case Info: United States v. Skrmetti | Case No. 23-477 | Date Argued: 12/4/24
Link to Docket: Here.
Question Presented: Whether Tennessee Senate Bill 1 (SBl), which prohibits all medical treatments intended to allow "a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor's sex" or to treat "purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor's sex and asserted identity," Tenn. Code Ann. § 68-33-103(a)(1), violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Oral Advocates:
- For petitioner: Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.
- For respondents L.W., et al. supporting petitioner: Chase B. Strangio, New York, N. Y.
- For respondents Jonathan Skrmetti, et al.: J. Matthew Rice, Solicitor General, Nashville, Tenn.