
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


United States v. Taylor | Case No. 20-1459 | Date Argued: 12/7/2021 | Date Decided: 6/21/2022
Question Presented: Whether 18 U.S.C. 924(c)(3)(A)'s definition of "crime of violence" excludes attempted Hobbs Act robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1951(a).
Holding: Attempted Hobbs Act robbery does not qualify as a “crime of violence” under §924(c)(3)(A) because no element of the offense requires proof that the defendant used, attempted to use, or threatened to use force.
Result: Adjudged to be AFFIRMED.
Voting Breakdown: 7-1. Justice Gorsuch delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh and Barrett joined. Justice Thomas and Justice Alito filed dissenting opinions.
Link to Opinion: Here.
Oral Advocates:
For Petitioner: Rebecca Taibleson, Assistant to the Solicitor
By SCOTUS Oral Arguments4.3
66 ratings
United States v. Taylor | Case No. 20-1459 | Date Argued: 12/7/2021 | Date Decided: 6/21/2022
Question Presented: Whether 18 U.S.C. 924(c)(3)(A)'s definition of "crime of violence" excludes attempted Hobbs Act robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1951(a).
Holding: Attempted Hobbs Act robbery does not qualify as a “crime of violence” under §924(c)(3)(A) because no element of the offense requires proof that the defendant used, attempted to use, or threatened to use force.
Result: Adjudged to be AFFIRMED.
Voting Breakdown: 7-1. Justice Gorsuch delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh and Barrett joined. Justice Thomas and Justice Alito filed dissenting opinions.
Link to Opinion: Here.
Oral Advocates:
For Petitioner: Rebecca Taibleson, Assistant to the Solicitor

25,874 Listeners

3,528 Listeners

372 Listeners

695 Listeners

1,118 Listeners

2,890 Listeners

6,295 Listeners

112,617 Listeners

32,371 Listeners

10,236 Listeners

7,068 Listeners

5,769 Listeners

3,882 Listeners

16,056 Listeners

737 Listeners