
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Moderator: Gwilym Roberts, Partner at Kilburn & Strode LLP, London
Guests: Cyra Nargolwalla, Partner at Passeraud IP, Paris and Dr Joachim Renken, Partner at Hoffmann Eitle, Munich
In a lively debate three experienced patent attorneys critically assess “Opposition by VICO” at the EPO.
Oral proceedings cannot be postponed indefinitely, despite the pandemic’s restrictions on travel and meetings. Since last summer the EPO has been transitioning to videoconferencing (VICO) for opposition hearings, adapting its technical platforms and legal frameworks to keep the wheels of justice turning. But what do patent attorneys think about the EPO’s VICOs services? What has gone well, and what do they suggest for improvements?
By European Patent Office5
11 ratings
Moderator: Gwilym Roberts, Partner at Kilburn & Strode LLP, London
Guests: Cyra Nargolwalla, Partner at Passeraud IP, Paris and Dr Joachim Renken, Partner at Hoffmann Eitle, Munich
In a lively debate three experienced patent attorneys critically assess “Opposition by VICO” at the EPO.
Oral proceedings cannot be postponed indefinitely, despite the pandemic’s restrictions on travel and meetings. Since last summer the EPO has been transitioning to videoconferencing (VICO) for opposition hearings, adapting its technical platforms and legal frameworks to keep the wheels of justice turning. But what do patent attorneys think about the EPO’s VICOs services? What has gone well, and what do they suggest for improvements?

11,164 Listeners

898 Listeners

184 Listeners

24 Listeners

410 Listeners

113,122 Listeners

263 Listeners

67 Listeners

151 Listeners

285 Listeners

786 Listeners

678 Listeners

2,358 Listeners

0 Listeners

0 Listeners