
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
In a 6-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of a web designer refusing to make a website for same-sex marriages, despite a Colorado law that prohibits discrimination against gay people. In another case involving a mail carrier who was refusing to work on his Sabbath, the courts unanimously decided to broaden religious protections, creating a new standard for testing religious accommodations. Jim Oleske is a law professor at Lewis & Clark Law School. He joins us to break down the two cases and dig into the complicated intersection of religious freedoms and other constitutional values.
4.5
261261 ratings
In a 6-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of a web designer refusing to make a website for same-sex marriages, despite a Colorado law that prohibits discrimination against gay people. In another case involving a mail carrier who was refusing to work on his Sabbath, the courts unanimously decided to broaden religious protections, creating a new standard for testing religious accommodations. Jim Oleske is a law professor at Lewis & Clark Law School. He joins us to break down the two cases and dig into the complicated intersection of religious freedoms and other constitutional values.
9,115 Listeners
3,883 Listeners
38,238 Listeners
1,014 Listeners
25 Listeners
6,623 Listeners
219 Listeners
14,505 Listeners
134 Listeners
4,625 Listeners
110,865 Listeners
55,866 Listeners
4 Listeners
10,075 Listeners
4,201 Listeners
15,953 Listeners
5,976 Listeners
964 Listeners
15,294 Listeners
216 Listeners
178 Listeners