Peer review is defined as “a process of subjecting an author’s scholarly work, research or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field”. Like the academic world, peer reviews in CRM are intended to ensure high quality research and to improve the quality of reports; they are also intended to ensure proper regulatory application and compliance. However, peer reviews are at times used for nefarious purposes' this is having a negative impact on the effectiveness of the process. Today’s podcast explores how peer reviews are being employed in CRM and what can be done to get back to the original intent.

Transcripts
For rough transcripts of this episode go to https://www.archpodnet.com/crmarchpodcast/252Follow Our Panelists On Twitter

Bill @succinctbill; Doug @openaccessarch; Stephen @processarch; Andrew @AndrewKinkella, Chris W @Archeowebby, @DIGTECHLLC, and @ArchPodNet

Blogs and Resources:

• Bill White: Succinct Research
• Doug Rocks-MacQueen: Doug’s Archaeology
• Stephen Wagner: Process - Opinions on Doing Archaeology
• Chris Webster: Random Acts of Science
• Andrew Kinkella
  Kinkella Teaches Archaeology (Youtube)
  Blog: Kinkella Teaches Archaeology

ArchPodNet

• APN Website: https://www.archpodnet.com
• APN on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/archpodnet
• APN on Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/archpodnet
• APN on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/archpodnet
• Tee Public Store

Affiliates

• Wildnote
• TeePublic
• Timeular
• Motion