Peter Navarro’s Taking Back Trump’s America

Peter Navarro served with Kelly for 510 days and found him to be a Trump-deranged coward, bully, and traitor.  Get the details here.

Follow Navarro at www.peternavarro.substack.com

"It's not a crime to defend the Constitution.  It's your duty."

Team,

Here's the Deep Dive of my article about how Barack Obama and Bill Clinton are, in their arrogance, helping Kamala Harris lose North Carolina.

Take a listen. Rate and Review.

I'll have the article up tomorrow as a podcast

and follow me at www.peternavarro.substack.com 

Navarro breaks down the latest poll numbers from Rasmussen and dives deep into the battle over a crucial Nebraska electoral college vote.

Visit Navarro at www.peternavarro.substack.com 

Rate and Review this podcast please....

Hot stuff from Steve Bannon's War Room.  Please review and rate this.

Visit me at www.peternavarro.substack.com 

This is both hilarious and interesting.  I fed a key chapter of The New MAGA Deal book into an AI washing machine, and here's what it spit out.  Note the woke edges but nonetheless well worth a listening.  

Visit my substack at www.peternavarro.substack.com 

This excerpt from Peter Navarro's book, The New MAGA Deal, argues that the Republican Party needs to re-define the meaning of "MAGA" in order to win the 2024 presidential election. Navarro claims that the term represents a "Populist Economic Nationalist" movement that prioritizes American manufacturing, secure borders, and ending America's endless wars. He asserts that "MAGA" is not extremist, but rather embodies values of God, country, and family. Navarro proposes a strategy to counter Democratic attacks on the movement by highlighting its core principles and promoting the idea of "MAGA ambassadors" who can explain the movement to their communities.

READ THE ARTICLE AT WWW.PETERNAVARRO.SUBSTACK.COM 

Listen NOW to the Deep Dive Duo discuss the article.  It's a little woke but otherwise does a good job.

This briefing doc analyzes Peter Navarro's Substack article detailing his experience in prison and subsequent investigation into the Bureau of Prisons' (BOP) implementation of the First Step Act (FSA).

Main Themes:

1. BOP Failure to Implement the FSA: Navarro argues that the BOP, under Democrat leadership, is deliberately obstructing the implementation of the FSA, a bipartisan criminal justice reform bill signed into law by President Trump in 2018.

Important Ideas and Facts:

• FSA Benefits: The FSA aims to reduce over-sentencing by offering earned good behavior and training credits. It also facilitates inmate transition back into society through halfway houses or home confinement.

Quotes:

• "During my prison stay, I discovered that the Bureau of Prisons has steadfastly refused to enforce the 2018 First Step Act, which was passed through the leadership and 'smart on crime' vision of Donald Trump."

Conclusion:

Navarro's article presents a scathing critique of the BOP's handling of the FSA, highlighting its human and economic costs. His call to action for Congress and his framing of the issue as a potential 2024 election decider underscores his belief in the urgency and political significance of this matter. It's crucial to note that Navarro's perspective is inherently biased due to his personal experience and political affiliations. Further investigation and analysis from diverse perspectives are needed to fully evaluate the extent and implications of the BOP's FSA implementation.

Little did I know when I went to prison in defense of our Constitution that I would moonlight as an investigative reporter and uncover a $5 billion waste of taxpayer money.  Three months after my prison release, neither the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) nor the U.S. Congress has yet to do a damn thing about this monumental government failure.   

To the contrary, with a stunning announcement on October 8, the BOP has moved in the OPPOSITE direction, effectively institutionalizing the problem. Meanwhile, the House Judiciary Committee is doing what it has done most of the last two years – absolutely nothing but bloviating.  

LISTEN FOR THE REST OF THE STORY.   VISIT WWW.PETERNAVARRO.SUBSTACK.COM FOR MORE

Guest-hosting on Bannon's War Room, Peter Navarro exposes the idiocy of Barack Obama claiming he, not Donald Trump, built a strong economy.

www.peternavarro.substack.com

The Deep Dive crew take a look at Peter Navarro's claim of a momentum shift following the Vance Walz October 1 debate

Navarro writes:

The Kamala Harris blue tide in this year’s presidential election turned Trump red on October 1st.  That’s the night the youngster JD Vance made the oldster Tim Walz look like both a little kid and lunkhead. 

This momentum shift, long overdue, is as it should be.  The Trump-Vance ticket is strongly preferred by voters on the top issues that now regularly pop out in the polls: the economy and the related issue of inflation, immigration and border security, crime and public safety, foreign policy and the chaos in Gaza and carnage Ukraine. 

The margins in favor of Trump-Vance on these most salient issues are not even close and no amount of abortion, health care or threats to democracy messaging can possibly level that polling playing field.

By speaking directly to the people, JD Vance was able to shake off the shackles the legacy media had immediately bound him in once he was on the ticket.  Here, the treatment of Vance versus Walz by the likes of ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, CNN, MSNBC, and print agit-propers like the New York Times and Washington Post offered a stark “cat lady” indictment of a Leftist, pro-Harris press seeking to intervene in an election.

The Kamala Harris blue tide in this year’s presidential election turned Trump red on October 1st.  That’s the night the youngster JD Vance made the oldster Tim Walz look like both a little kid and lunkhead. 

During the October 1st debate, I was both assuming and hoping that JD Vance would go for the jugular on all of these Walz foibles which the legacy media had swept under the rug.  I figured he would go for the knockout just like Trump knocked out Biden.

But JD did the smarter thing; and it’s what Kamala Harris should have done in her debate with Trump rather than simply attack him.   Vance used much of his stage time to re-introduce himself to an American public that had been indoctrinated by the legacy media. 

Vance then used the rest of the time to peacefully disagree with Walz on a range of issues and thereby demonstrated Vance’s superior intellect and temperament.  It was like watching a cat toy with a mouse.  A quarterback debating a lineman.

Ultimately, what Vance did in that debate is reaffirm that Trump beats Harris not just in where he stands on the economy, inflation, border, crime, and foreign policy but even when it comes to picking Vice Presidents.