
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This study critiques the Qwen2.5 model's reasoning performance, highlighting data contamination issues and advocating for clean benchmarks and accurate reward signals in reinforcement learning evaluations.
https://arxiv.org/abs//2507.10532
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ArxivPapers
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@arxiv_papers
Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/arxiv-papers/id1692476016
Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/arxiv-papers
By Igor Melnyk5
33 ratings
This study critiques the Qwen2.5 model's reasoning performance, highlighting data contamination issues and advocating for clean benchmarks and accurate reward signals in reinforcement learning evaluations.
https://arxiv.org/abs//2507.10532
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ArxivPapers
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@arxiv_papers
Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/arxiv-papers/id1692476016
Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/arxiv-papers

967 Listeners

1,940 Listeners

433 Listeners

112,416 Listeners

9,932 Listeners

5,518 Listeners

219 Listeners

49 Listeners

93 Listeners

467 Listeners