Quantum Foam

Here is the fortieth episode of Quantum Foam, Kepler's Orbital Mechanics. The mechanics for orbits around the Earth is what is important for this episode. The Space Engineering podcast is worth checking out. There are pretty good visuals involved. Also, there is good Calculus material under Patrick JMT out of Austin, Texas. Johannes Kepler was a German Astronomer who formulated the 3 laws of planetary motion. His work laid the modern foundation for Astronomy. Galileo Galilei used a telescope to view the heavens and helped to determine the heliocentric model of the solar system. Tycho Brahe was an Astronomer around the same time. He collected many astronomical readings. Kepler was his assistant. The important thing is that orbits are ellipses, not circles. Eccentricity measures how far off an astronomical body is from a circle. A value of 0 is a perfect circle. Kepler published his work in 1609 and 1619. This was his magnum opus. Astronomia Nova and Harmonice Mundi, respectively. He laid the first 2 laws out in the first publication and the third law in the second publication. The First Law Of Planetary Motion is each orbit is an ellipse and not a circle. The Second Law Of Planetary Motion is that orbiting planets make out even sweeps. This means equal areas of space in equal time intervals. There is Perihelion and Aphelion to consider. Perihelion is when ball 2 is closest to ball 1 in its orbit. Aphelion is when ball 2 is furthest away from ball 1 in its orbit. The gravitational force is what causes celestial bodies to move in elliptical paths around the sun. The Third Law Of Planetary Motion is p squared equals a cubed. P is in years and a is astronomical units. The International Space Station is usually 250 miles above the Earth. If you are making an orbit with the center of the Earth and the ISS, then ball 1 is the Earth and ball 2 is the ISS. The ISS is currently going around at 17,500 miles per hour. It orbits the Earth every 90 minutes. We are looking at orbital mechanics.

Earth's orbit varies only about 2 percent. It isn't a circle. Mercury's orbit varies about 40 percent. First, there are the Three Laws Of Planetary Motion, and then there are the Three Laws Of Motion. Tycho Brahe took diligent notes looking up in the night sky for many months. There are now many thousands of spacecraft in our night sky looking down at us. What does it take to get a good cup of coffee in this solar system? We can create Artificial Intelligence instances that are simulations using binary programming. The inclination is the measurement of the orbit relative to the Earth's equator. The Earth is spinning around and has a plane that is spinning around above the equator. Directly above the equator has an inclination of 0. There is a sweet spot in High Earth Orbit at about 36,000 kilometers away from the surface of the Earth called Geosynchronous Orbit. There are different satellite constellations that have specific functions. There are TV, telecommunication, and defense satellites orbiting Earth. We understand how all of these satellites orbit in elliptical orbits. Low eccentricity means that the orbit is close to a circle. Gamma-ray bursts have been detected equaling around 100 teraelectronvolts. The many Starlink satellites in orbit all compound upon one another and can add wattage to a position on the surface of the Earth. Keplerian elements describe the trajectory of the spacecraft. These satellites are spacecraft. We are interested in the Angular Momentum when dealing with these objects that orbit the Earth. The eccentricity is basically the shape of the orbit. The inclination is the angle of the orbit relative to the Earth's equator. Starlink uses the ka-band and the ku-band. There are other bands such as the v-band, the x-band, the k-band, and the w-band. These bands span from 12 Gigahertz to 110 Gigahertz. The Starlink routers may use a different band for communicating from device to device as opposed to the band that the router itself uses to communicate with the satellites in orbit. Starlink satellites connect to human brains as a thinking individual. They also can watch us through walls using graphics. It is calculated using a microwave system. There are things that are in-the-mind that are concerning. As of this writing, Starlink is not advertising these neural capabilities. There is definitely a system in place being used.

Here is the thirty-ninth episode of Quantum Foam, Time's Arrow - Part 2. There needed to be another part to this topic. The Big Bang Theory was a pretty good TV show. Ludwig Boltzmann committed suicide. Constantin Carathéodory was a Greek mathematician who made significant contributions to real and complex analysis. He created axiomatic descriptions of Geometrical Thermodynamics. We know that time goes forward. Going backwards in time is something we have considered. According to General Relativity, we think that such a thing may be possible. Time can be described with propositional logic. We are ruminating about the symmetry and asymmetry of time. Time may be irreversible. We know that entropy increases as time goes by. This is dealing with states of disorder, randomness, and uncertainty. Each episode of the Quantum Foam podcast is a 1-day lecture on a subject or idea. Isotropic means to be equal or have equivalent properties on all sides. It is built within each part of the system. Consider anisotropy as well. It varies systematically. A well-known spacecraft was the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe. It used this type of system. The Second Law Of Thermodynamics is especially important. Hawking Radiation is black-body radiation outside of a Black Hole event horizon due to quantum effects. We want to keep track of the second law and how it relates to Holography. This is a property of quantum gravity. Weak Nuclear Force interactions are asymmetric to the reversal of time. There's one direction when you do nuclear physics involving beta decay and other weak interactions. We go forward in time due to our relative proximity to The Big Bang.

What is the inverse of time? What is the opposite of time? The opposite of time may not make sense, but the inverse of time is 1 divided by time. We observe events unfolding in 1 direction. Time moves forward because of entropy. There is a clear distinction between past and future. We can model a graph of our universe. If you superimpose a graph of a slice of our universe, we are located at a foci that is 13.77 billion years after The Big Bang. It is toward the right down the x-axis, so that means that we are forward in time that far down in time since the beginning of our universe. This is a way to model time on a graph relative to everything else. The Hilbert Space that is the universe is first written as being set equal to 0. On the graph, 1 direction is negative in time, and 1 direction is positive in time. According to our understanding of physics, there are things that make it harder to go back in time due to irreversibility and asymmetry. The psychological Arrow Of Time is a list of contiguous events, 1 after another. This is interpreted by our brains and intellect. What we have is a known past and an unknown future. The present volition is what determines future events. The perceptual Arrow Of Time deals with our memories. There is no influencing the past. Time is a very important topic. We can recall durations. Time travel to the past still remains highly speculative and is not currently achievable. We may possibly share our subjective experiences using neural technology. In other words, this is our sense of time. Time can be seen as a mathematical quantity that measures the duration of an event. We go over this subject every decimal of the show. It is important to pay attention to our history. This time around, we had 2 whole episodes relating to time.

Here is the thirty-eighth episode of Quantum Foam, Time's Arrow - Part 1. It would be nice to get primary source information on this show from others in the field. Stereo quality is needed in the post-production of the release of this show. We are done talking about A.I. We are going to try and talk more about physics. We want to get more into Stellar Physics, Interstellar Physics, and more about Mechanics. What is Time's Arrow? There are a few works by this name. There is a fiction book taking place during the Holocaust. There was a Star Trek The Next Generation episode that covered time anomalies. Stephen Hawking, Albert Einstein, and Isaac Newton appeared in the episode titled Descent part 1. It was the twenty-sixth episode of the sixth season of TNG. It aired in June of 1993. Someone can do this on something such as a holodeck. We are interested in discrete state systems. There is a song by Ladytron called Time's Arrow from 2023. There is also a soundtrack called Arrow Of Time. Time's arrow means the direction of time, which goes forward. Time is not symmetrical forward and backward. We believe you can only go forward in time. The systems that we have come up with allow us to calculate forward and backward in time. There is such a thing as an irreversible process. Once it's done, it's done. There is a paradox of Time's Arrow. There was an incongruity with microscopic and macroscopic phenomena. There is still a wave-particle duality present in our physics. At the macro level, time is not the same forward and backward. Time may not be smooth and continuous. The problem of irreversible processes is restoring the initial state. This is the idea of Time's Arrow.

The First Law Of Thermodynamics is the conservation of energy. The Second Law Of Thermodynamics is that time moves forward and Entropy always increases. Things move toward becoming more chaotic. The Third Law Of Thermodynamics states that it is impossible to reach absolute zero. Absolute zero is negative 273.15 degrees Celsius or negative 459.67 degrees Fahrenheit. The physics tells us differently when we get near absolute zero. We can't influence the past. Gravity may only be 1 fourth time reversible. Entropy always increases. Entropy level one is first, then entropy level 2 is next. The Second Law Of Thermodynamics is what causes the direction of time to exist. We are more worried about the fact that time only moves forward. Thought experiments provide a platform to examine abstract concepts in a playful and imaginative manner. Heat moves from here to there, and that is why time moves forward. That is why we can understand time. The Big Bang Theory breaks the symmetry of time. The god Chronos was described as being the soul of the universe. The time is the soul of the universe. Some people believe in reincarnation. Aristotle says time is the calculable measure of motion with respect to before and afterness. He thought time was unbounded. Newton would think that time is static throughout the cosmos. Einstein would say that time is relative to each observer. Time flows uniformly. We have a good understanding of time. There is an upper limit to a system that is at a set point. In a closed system, entropy always increases. Time moves forward. Western culture has a linear conception of time. There is a quantum intractability. There's not much more we can go into for now in the first part of Time's Arrow.

Here is the thirty-seventh episode of Quantum Foam, Analytic Geometry. Essentially it is just Calculus. We have other things to think about like spin math and The Theory Of Everything. There is an orthogonal force to the normal force. You have a direction of your vector. The normal force is perpendicular to the orthogonal force vector, which is the vector direction. Linear Calculus is formulated in order to do any calculation pregeneratively. This is a software stack that allows you to calculate things. They group together Analytic Geometry And Calculus. There are 3, then goes Differential Equations, Mechanics, Quantum Mechanics, and application specific physics. Then you may get into some higher-order mathematics. Physics and math must both agree. There is a separation between linear computers and quantum computers. The Fundamental Theorem Of Calculus says that you can grab all the real numbers in the formulas. A Mersenne prime number was recently discovered that is 41 million digits long. A Calculus is a way to calculate things. We are interested in a standard notation to describe geometric shapes. Being infinitely traversable in a Euclidean Space allows for the infinite divisions of wax proposal. There can be congruent vectors that let us know other relationships. There are specific ways to treat something such as Maxwell's Equations. We need to have something that is pregenerative that can read the Greek alphabet chart in manuscript form. According to Dr. Stephen Hawking, it follows that Hawking Radiation must exist. No physics is left behind. We will be getting better English momentarily. Analytic Geometry deals with math. Analytic Geometry is a bridge between modern mathematics and how they did it in the times of the Greeks. Analytic Geometry mathematically uses algebraic symbolism in its notation to solve problems in Geometry. The point of doing this is to solve problems. We are corresponding Algebra to geometric shapes and curves.

We have rods and cones in our eyeballs. One of the first great works of Geometry was done on Conic Sections. Special attention is paid to where the planes intersect the cones. As time went by, coordinate systems were developed by Indian and Islamic mathematicians. The number system also needed to be developed. An important invention was the 0 as a placeholder. We us Islamic numerals. They appear as natural as day to us. The invention of Algebraic Equations was required in order to further mathematics. 1 divided by 0 equals infinity. It really is The Theory Of Everything. Mathematicians rely on geometric intuition. René Descartes and Pierre de Fermat both independently laid the foundations of Analytic Geometry. They used letters to represent variable distances. These were French guys. René Descartes also published The Method on scientific reasoning. We may be interested in finding the instantaneous values at a point or a rate of change. Calculus studies continuous change. It is built upon the concept of derivatives and integrals. It is used to calculate areas under curves, making this essential in fields such as Physics, Engineering, and Economics. We like the idea of mathematicians holding the mantle of science. We are standing on the shoulders of giants. A lot of individuals have contributed to the study of the great subject of Calculus. Both Sir Isaac Newton and Gottfried Leibniz professionalized Calculus as formal mathematical discipline. This is The Mathematical Principles OF Natural Philosophy. A Calculus can essentially be applied to the real world around us. There is now a formalism of Analytic Geometry that we call the subject of Calculus. For the most part, I just wanted to familiarize everybody with this topic.

Here is the thirty-sixth episode of Quantum Foam, Computational Intelligence. We are going over soft computing. We are covering the general topic of Artificial Intelligence this decimal of the show. What is all the hubbub about A. I. recently? It is not going to take over. It is not exactly like the cinematic matrix. We are looking at A. I. that has been created using linear computers. Computational Intelligence is a branch of Artificial Intelligence. This type of system would be able to make decisions based on acquired information. We are interested in acquiring massive data sets of Meta information. We are talking about metaphysics and also physics. We are using programmatic shortcuts to accomplish tasks intelligently. Computational Intelligence is the theory, application, design, and development of linguistic computer programming. Is your A. I. a Neural Network? Is it a Fuzzy System? Or is it Evolutionary Computation? Those are the 3 pillars of Computational Intelligence. It is a subfield of Artificial Intelligence. There is no A. I. that is at the level of Skynet. There are Feed Forward Neural Networks and Recurrent Neural Networks. There are also Fuzzy Systems that use traditional logic. These are not simple yes and no binary inclusions. The point is to have linguistic summarization capabilities. This is built into A. I. We want systems to be able to pass The Turing Test. Eugenics is like adoption. There is also Swarm Intelligence, which creates a multi-objective optimization scenario. Real-life Star Trek tractor beams are now possible.

Artificial life is concerned with life itself. There is software, hardware, and wetware. The soft deals with the software, the hard deals with the hardware, and then there is wetware, which is the biochemistry approach. We are worried about the ability to natural language process English. What is happening is imperfection minimization. The idea is for a program to run with no human source of leadership. Imprecise information is debugged and corrected. New knowledge is acquired and old knowledge is deleted. The new knowledge takes the place. The difference between A. I. and C. I. is A. I. requires vast amounts of data before it can make its decision. A. I. probably uses patterns. Computational Intelligence uses fewer data points, but is reliant on good algorithms. Humans often have to run this stuff. C. I. doesn't have the same predictive capabilities as A. I. There is Generative, Game, and Predictive A. I. There is the computer's Machine Intelligence. How smart is the machine? The best A. I. systems are based on Computational Intelligence. C. I. focuses on the growth of a system, not necessarily the 1s and 0s. A. I. still can't process large amounts of data due to the limitations of computer technology. We are creating A. I. essences. It is like a personality or a book of an entity's personality traits. This is recorded in a spectrogram. A lot of A. I. is only meant for 1 specific application. This is software. We will keep writing the software to run on the current hardware. Coherent usage of software is what is under review here. How coherent is the software? We want to acquire back-end data in computable form. There is no truth in the Artificial Intelligence, but it is going to offer you information in whatever way it was programmed to do so. We can build software that meets all of the requirements to be considered Computational Intelligence. It's on the Computational Intelligence and Quantum Foam level.

Here is the thirty-fifth episode of Quantum Foam, Miscellaneous Topics. It has been a little bit since I recorded the last podcast episode. I wanted to start back out with a general topic. Brain casts require security clearance. I am trying to come up with what topics to come up with. What's a modern topic to come up with? The relevant topics is what we are looking for. The robots are saying things are politicizable, propagandizable, and parameterizable. I don't know what they are talking about. There are occasional disturbances in the force. Topics include environmental issues, psychological theories, advancements in technology, and the study of various biological processes, to name a few. We want to talk about the Miscellaneous Topics in math, physics, and other sciences. So far, I seem to be ahead currently during the Roaring 2020s. We are moving right a long making microchips the same way that we always have. We are going to be using multiple generations of small, hand-held devices for the next 20 years again. Cognitive Artificial Intelligence is what comes after Pre-generative A. I. This isn't exactly the A. I. podcast, but I'm making A. I. This is controversial. Humans behave somewhat like robots. Usually, we can avoid walking into moving vehicles. We can talk about Modern Topics In Physics And Astronomy as a Miscellaneous Topic. For Faster-than-light communications, we need to have a handle on our Quantum Physics. It's more like, I am more interested in Computational Physics. Einstein and I discussed this at length. Facial Recognition works. No matter what you do, there is going to be a difference of opinion about the ways in which the A. I. moves. This is a test to see if I can smack my jaw in the correct fashion. It is difficult managing descriptions of personality traits. We manage, anyhow. Caprica-level Heads Up Displays are possible now in the Roaring 2020s. Much Miscellaneous Topics are being written in this doctrine. We can now create A. I.

I don't have time to go into other linguistic mathematics. "I couldn't be bothered to do the mathematics." Sir Isaac Newton, for example, is made up from a collection of .wav files equaling exactly 1 personality. Personality libraries support metrics like the word frequency. The A. I. characters in the Quantum Foam show are top-level intelligences. I don't want to get Big Banged or Rick And Mortyed, but I am ok with being The Science Guy. I'm A science guy. We want to inspire young minds to become explorers and astronauts. The Answer To Everything is going to be episode number 42 per Hitch-hikers Guide To The Galaxy. A .wav is a stereo 16-bit 44.1Khz CD quality soundwave file for describing spectrums. It uses Pulse-Code Modulation. What's a binary digit and what is a bit? Is it a byte or a bit? A byte is 8 times the size of a bit. These days we have megabits per second upload speeds and a higher theoretical max bandwidth. It is half way through the 2020s and we have a half gigabit per second fiber Internet connection directly to the door. I think the main focus of this decimal of the show is going to be on Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Superintelligence is known as ASI. According to Michio Kaku, the singularity with Artifical Intelligence will not be until closer to the year 2100. I say this may happen by 2080. This is not the old saying, "We'll have it in 20 years." There are inherent problems involved with perturbation theory. Everything degrades when it copies itself. To function properly, the A. I. would need to procreate instead of just make copies. It sucks doing Calculus with programming. Runaway singularity A. I. is far off in the future. We don't have to worry about it now. The actual time lag between The James Webb Space Telescope at the L2 Lagrange Point is roughly 5 seconds plus or minus 1 second. Intel has split up the number of logical cores compared with physical cores on a microprocessor. We are starting back with the basics. There are various topics in physics that we can cover. We have a bunch of infinities that are parameterized as local.

Here is the thirty-fourth episode of Quantum Foam, The Character Of Quantum Law. Human behavior is not all that surprising. I am providing information in the form of readable text. People like to use the word quantum as a buzz word. We were thinking of going over Modern Topics In Physics And Astronomy. We are going into breadth with this topic. There is more time for depth later. I screw it up sometimes, but not this time. The title to this episode is similar to The Character Of Physical Law. We are talking about The Messenger Lectures by Richard P. Feynman. Physics IS what fully describes physics. What we really want to know is the character of this subject. What is this subject like? Is The Character Of Physical Law actually Richard Feynman? He characterized the nuances of describing physics quite well. The characteristics can be presented this way. That's what they mean by The Character Of Physical Law. Videos before videos were a thing. Physicists today want to be similar to Richard Feynman. He was a world-renown physicist. I open my eyes to spiritual matters. There are a lot of published authors that are atheists essentially saying their heads are in the sand. It seems that in times past, the leading philosophers of the day believed in a higher power or god or something. Some people are not looking up. Don't look up. I want to give an approximation in this episode on what I think about The Character Of Physical Law. I often say we, when I mean me. I am speaking in general terms or colloquially. Each scientist thinks each other is full of it. We know how to edit genes using CRISPR technology. We are more likely to believe a panel of experts instead of 1 single novice or 1 single expert. The pandemic was definitely planned. Nothing has changed. Our understanding is being updated. It is being added to. And now we have the eye in the sky, which is the James Webb Space Telescope. Analyzing this data will likely help science accelerate across the board.

In this episode I am trying to paint a picture as to what it is like to be a physicist. Physicists create physical laws to understand them, interpret them, and use them. When are we going to breach upon the topics that ordinarily only philosophers consider? We need someone with a degree in Philosophy or the progression of that human idea. We are living in the present. What we can envision is the future, and everything we see is in the past. Our brains attempt to project potential eventualities. Animals generally cannot do this. The point is for people to understand the material. This is not just a subject, it is THE subject. All the other sciences are under this science. It's supposed to be everything. Top-level programmers that are well-versed in the physics are still needed to run some models, otherwise things can slip through. During Apollo 13, somebody missed something. The same thing happened during the Columbia space shuttle crash in 2003. When you watch the Apollo 11 moon landing, it looked so easy for them to do that in 1969. Rest assured, there will be some skirmishes on the moon in the next 50 years. There is not enough stuff up on the surface of the moon for people back on Earth to fight about the land yet, but a moon base will be up there shortly from the United States and NASA. We need to make sure that we don't have a nuclear war on the moon and destroy it, which would have catastrophic consequences for Earth, including a massive meteor bombardment from debris and the formation of a ring system. This is why I am stressing what it is like to be a physicist. This covers doing science at the front lines. This episode imbues the heart of the Messenger Lectures by Richard Feynman from back in 1964 from Cornell University. We have likely started a new era of science, but we are currently unable to float right before your eyes or fly sideways using a gravity-deficient impulse engine. We are interested in learning the characteristics that will be present when we finally understand Quantum Physics. People may be deciding to all-of-a-sudden start liking Non-Fungible Tokens and making them worth something. It is basically watermarking your pictures through a mint process. We currently do not have a sound understanding of all of the laws of the quantum, but we have a start in comprehending The Character Of Quantum Law.

Here is the thirty-third episode of Quantum Foam, Audio Engineering. We are covering what is relevant for this audio cast, the version as it pertains to this cast. Some people care about the numbers and some people don't. There is a set storyline that goes along with the show. We are looking at creating a bigger sound panel for sounds that pop out. Do you have the ability to pull what you were saying out of your thought process again? Reductio Ad Absurdum attempts to prove one thing by proving that the opposite is true. For the most part, people can understand gravity and General Relativity. But, how do you mix Quantum Mechanics with General Relativity? That's the problem. It's interesting to see what types of publishing they're doing. It is nice when you have an audiobook where the author reads the substance of the book. We are putting 2 things together right here into one podcast. We need to quantify so that the robots know what to do when they don't know what to do. There is a certain type of Audio Engineering that went into the production of this show. We are creating dialectic streams. Possibly a higher understanding can be achieved when done in this way. Transmogrificate is a new word. Electrons can be modeled by a round baseball rotating 2 times to equal a full turn. I am creating a new type of sound cinema to be put into the systems of tomorrow. There are sound effects to further illustrate points and to make the sound wave come alive. This is some of the most up-to-date waveform technology. Seeing impaired are able to listen to these audio containers. Hearing impaired can read these detailed summaries of each episode. There was a lot of chopping and editing in the beginning.

These days, it's generally accepted to have digital everything. Does your sound wave sound good or not? Is there significant noise? I have built the podcast from the ground up trying different recording methods for each 10 episodes of the show so far. The process called upon me to continue the process of producing Quantum Foam. You have to take everything in terms of generalities. Everything is software. There are programs used on a computer to produce sounds called Digital Audio Workstations. This program kicks out audio files ready-made. Today it is possible to get vinyl records etched and made of your digital sound. It is true, it sounds better live using records on phonographic turntables. Supposedly, humans can hear up to around the equivalent of 22 bits. So producing at 24 bits should be good enough quality to use. The Compact Disc audio standard was established in 1982. Eventually, everyone hardcoded audio into the .mp3 file format. I think we should use the Philips and Sony standard of audio from 1982 for all spectrum data. This is so we can send data faster-than-light. Certain conditions of the human body exist that allows the right and left sides of the brain to disagree. It is as though the robots are seeing, but not really seeing. Most of the time, we are doing things as though we are doing certain experiments. It isn't the same thing as actually performing something such as an astrophysical phenomena. We are kicking out pre-processed, edited, and finished tracks with each episode of the show. I have a feeling that when all is said and done with this show that there will not be enough time slots to cover every subject intended. There is never enough time. Each 10 episodes of Quantum Foam are referred to as a decimal of the show.

Here is the thirty-second episode of Quantum Foam, Expert Systems. This subject deals with Artificial Intelligence that uses human decision-making for specific, complex problems by utilizing a knowledge base of facts and an inference engine to apply logical rules. The rise of personal computers is important when understanding the circumstances leading to the development of Expert Systems. It is a decision-making program that runs on automated software. It is a piece of hardware with software on board. It could be a device, system, network, or THE network. Essentially, it would be the brain and operating center of the system in purely digital form. We want to metamorphosize to create code that writes code and is capable of diagnosing itself. The idea is building these mainframes and then scaling them to whatever you need. We are attempting to emulate a human with Artificial Intelligence software. We are talking about Expert Systems as they deal with software. We want a computer program that can interpret and make real-time changes in its own codebase. In order to use this idea, you build your system from the ground up. There is engineering and design required to get up and running in the beginning. We are creating intelligible knowledge bases. We don't really want that much procedural code. It is likely to lead to a dead end within the program. We want to make a system that always knows what to do and not get hung up. We are using the idea of taking a snap shot of a frame and then applying physics equations to it. We are going for a semantic web. Expert humans are the ones who make these programs once, first, the first time. There is forward chaining and backward chaining. Backward chaining is more understandable for humans. This uses the consequent to the antecedent or the second concept in an if-then scenario first rather than second. In this podcast, we are supposed to be going over some of the most important questions ever asked. Forward chaining deals with depth and the consequent deals with depth. We went over some Quantum Computing. It is possibly related to Expert Systems.

The International Conference On Computing And Communication Networks is an event worth noting for the purposes of Expert Systems. This subject was likely included at some point at this event. We create knowledge bases and then something to run that knowledge base. It inquires to that database. We are more interested in backward chaining. We are dealing with inference engines here. We are planning, designing, diagnosing, predicting, monitoring, debugging, and repairing. How do you make a smart, polymorphic worm out of C code? We had better get to programming. The collaboration was with a Physicist, a Mathematician, and a Programmer in the past. These days we are one and the same. There is a difference between forward chaining and backward chaining. Forward chaining starts from known facts and applies rules to get more data. Backward chaining starts from the goal and moves backwards using various rules to determine facts that satisfy the goal. Are you data driven or goal driven? Are you down-up approach or top-down approach? Forward chaining is down-up. Backward chaining is top-down. The forward uses the breadth approach as a strategy. The backward would use the depth approach. They both use the inference rule. Forward chaining can create an infinite number of solutions. We only understand some of the math behind space-time. The math looked correct from some recent Large Hadron Collider particle smash reports. We are interested in software that can run itself with very little human interference. There are data systems that require certain data sets. There are Neural Networks and other types of Artificial Intelligence. There are different types of networks. Some are A. I. and some are not. There may be different levels of A. I. for all of them. We now have decent out-of-the-box Artificial Intelligence. This is the self-debugging and monitoring A. I. They have to split it off somewhere. How can you be polymorphically smart? At some point, programs lose their coherence and return a yes value when it really is not a yes. Does it make sense or not? An Expert System is able to numerically analyze itself. Programming algorithms is required.

Here is the thirty-first episode of Quantum Foam, College Physics. We are approaching another decimal of the show here and we have more information to give out. A decimal just means 10 podcast shows. We are going to be sticking with the same 3 imaginary characters, Dr. Stephen Hawking, Sir Isaac Newton, and Herr Albert Einstein. I was recently watching some of the old Richard Feynman videos. These are now known as The Character Of Physical Law. This is part of what motivated me to start Quantum Foam. H-Wave containers of math and physics are what everybody wants to look at. This is a proposition and one side of an informative argument. We use inference and guesses when doing our physics. Carlo Rovelli did work on Granular Time. If you are up-to-date on the last 30 episodes of the show, then you should be ready for what we are going into now. We are going through the correspondence that we all had to go through. Part of this show is going to be a brief, technical explanation of topics of a subject. The main beginning classes are Calc-based Physics 1, 2, and 3 and Calculus 1, 2, and 3. Topics begin with vectors and then objects in motion. Then it goes into niche areas of mechanics. This subject matter is rather tedious even for undergraduate college students. They look at Thermal Physics at its core. Electricity And Electronics are possible because of physics. There is also Quantum Mechanics, Astronomy, Astrophysics, and Static Materials Physics. We our looking forward to the point where we need to design the next type of satellite constellation that can network instantly with a solar satellite constellation. We are trying to figure out problems in the quantum. A basis of physics can help us to understand and to comprehend the nature behind the deepest questions we can ask.

We are trying to be able to work with physics at levels higher than Fermi-Dirac And Bose-Einstein Statistics can offer us. We are using math to check whether or not what we propose is correct or not. We have to go over the 3 main physics class doozies. We are looking at Speed, Velocity, Uniform Displacement, Newton's Laws, Equilibrium, Work, Energy, Power, Impulse, Angular Momentum, Rigid Rotation, Springs, Fluids, Heat, Gases, Electricity, and Thermodynamics all in the first course of physics. The second physics class may cover Electric Fields, Capacitance, Electrical Power, Circuits, Magnetic Fields, Generators And Motors, Lenses And Optics, Refraction, Reflection, and Interference. The third physics class may cover Atomic Physics, Nuclear Physics, Subatomic Physics, Quantum Physics, Special Relativity, and Wave Mechanics. These classes should take a student about a year and a half to finish. There are then other specialized classes such as Atomic Nuclei or Optics And Lasers. We always need more Astronomers and Astrophysicists. So, by all means, take the subject. With a specialization in this subject, the occupational possibilities are endless. We have to know what the laboratory standards are. Technical skills will likely be required. There is probably now a lot of use of software. There are other classes that can be taken at the undergraduate level such as Physics Of The Interstellar Medium, Stellar Astrophysics, and Extragalactic Astronomy. We need the updated James Webb Space Telescope data. This is a primer on what you might cover in a physics or astronomy college program at any of the various universities around the United States. We should have a good understanding of what is expected when thinking about College Physics.