
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The natural state of any relationship is that fact that ideas differ. That is not “a shame” … or a proof that there is distrust. It is just the natural starting position. If it were a proof of distrust, then the first step would indeed have to be to start developing trust
Instead, trust emerges, but is not a methodological primary step to achieve
The moral process and the knowledge creation process run in parallel.
DMAIC:
Popper’s method:
Illustrating what methods don't mention via the DMAIC problem solving method
Comparing the Popperian method to problem solving to it's alternative
Thoughts on why I think ESG is not a good vehicle for moral progress in companies
Some thoughts on why and how I took up an interest in Austrian Economics
Knowledge creation is "evidence based" when it starts from evidence, and "explanation based" when it starts from a problem and a (guessed) explanation for how to solve it
All plans are wrong for 2 main categories of reasons
There are 2 ways to deal with this:
Covering two opposite conceptions about what science is: the inductive method versus Popper's method
Also briefly covering what the relevance of this is to all our "other" types of knowledge (e.g. sociological, political, moral, ...)
From the publisher's feed