Real Science Radio

For more than a decade, BEL and Real Science Radio listeners have helped Bob on his 7 p.m. Monday night video conference call (nowadays on Google Hangouts) doing research and helping in other ways. To help reach our $30,000 telethon goal (we're at $6,000), if you would like to join this team, there is a participation cost of $20 per week. We know, we know. What? Pay money to help? Yes, here's why. First, we've been doing this for many years and we know that most folks think they can't really help and so they don't participate, but now, knowing that they've paid for their "seat at the table", we think that more people will actually join the team! Secondly, as Tom Healey, who sat in with Bob on the radio last week said, "I had no idea when I began working with BEL what an amazing education I would get and what a wonderful journey I would take." (Thanks Tom for your years of research and help!) So this is somewhat like paying for a class, and even though the class requires some effort, the payoff for those who apply themselves can be measured in lifetime and even eternal benefits! Third, over the last 26 years Bob and his staffers have trained scores of volunteers, many times to see our dear friends stop helping out because of understandable changes in their circumstances. As a result, we've become a bit hesitant to continue to train folks to be a part of our behind-the-scenes team. But with this new approach, opening to you the Monday night research team, even though there is now a cost, that may help us overcome all the above difficulties and help toward meeting our financial challenges. So, please call 1-800-8Enyart to "join the team" or email your name and number to [email protected]. Thanks, and may God continue to bless you! * Ha! What's This? Someone sent us a screenshot of a YouTube video where two lab guys doing a Carbon 14 presentation have recommended kgov.com/soft-tissue.

* Confirmations of RSR Predictions Roll In: We're broadcasting the news, RSR style. Bob Enyart airs the audio from last week's program when we made a prediction that Asteroid Florence may have one or two moons. Science headlines this week: Asteroid Florence has two moons! Ha! See more at rsr.org/predictions. There are about 1.5 million asteroids, and over 150 are known to have moons, or about 0.0001%. And they're believed, wrongly, to be not thousands but billions of years old. Further, the laws of physics make it enormously difficult for a body in space to capture as a moon another body (even if smaller by orders of magnitude). Thus even the most massive planets, with their relatively enormous gravitational pull, have captured only the tiniest percentage of asteroids as moons. Imagine then, with the relatively negligible gravity of asteroids, have phenomenally difficult it would be for one to capture a moon, even given billions of years. Then calculate the multiplied unlikelihood of one such asteroid capturing two moons! Yet (like in the Grand Canyon's Red Wall Limestone where one of eight nautiloid fossils are standing on end) known so far, about one of every 15 or so asteroids with moons have two moons! To understand why, you can either Google origin of asteroids and click on Walt Brown's chapter at creationscience.com, or just begin right here at rsr.org/asteroids. * Audio from Sept. 1, 2017 Prediction: Beginning at 15:30 into last week's RSR broadcast, Hurricanes, Today's Asteroid, Cancer Antibodies, and Other News (on America's most-powerful Christian radio station, Denver's 50,000-watt AM 670 KLTT), about the flyby of asteroid 3122 Florence: Fred Williams: Bob, we've made a past prediction related to this, right? Bob Enyart: Yes, because of Walt Brown's model that the debris from the fountains of the great deep. Much of it reached escape velocity, broke out of Earth’s gravity, and that debris became those errant bullets in the solar system - those dangerous things like meteoroids, asteroids, comets. And much of that debris, when it was out in space, it began to attract itself by its mutual gravity, forming asteroids and comets. And so Florence is really coming back home... But, almost four and one half million miles away, it’s about 20 times the distance of the moon. So, since NASA has been tracking these near asteroids, this is the largest asteroid at this near distance. FW: It’s pretty big. BE: Yeah. And it might have - because of our understanding of how asteroids and comets formed - it may have a moon in tow. Now we know that asteroids have moons. But we have been predicting that a higher percentage of asteroids will have moons than is generally assumed or has been identified so far. In fact, it might have a couple moons or even a debris field around it. Binary asteroid/comet hybrid. * UPDATE: Two weeks after today's program, from our all-scientists-work-for-Walt-Brown file, the journal Nature published the discovery of a binary asteroid/comet hybrid. Wow! "Rapid rotation" is one of the (unworkable) explanations claimed by secular astronomers for binary asteroids. Secular astronomers, though mostly ignorant of the Hydroplate Theory formation of comets and asteroids, nonetheless make frequent discoveries consistent with and in confirmation of HPT creation science predictions! * Audio from Eclipse Call to KHOW Radio: We also aired again our phone call to Denver's Ross Kaminski about the eclipse, and then Bob reads his email to Ross urging a follow-up program on the apparent fine-tuning of the universe, solar system, and Earth! * Program Note: Today's discussions of Hurricane Irma and of the Thornton Triceratops have been postponed until next week.  * Post-show Note: Here's the beginning of RSR's List of Things that are Not Rare: - rsr.org/dinosaur-soft-tissue - rsr.org/peanut-shaped-asteroids - rsr.org/earthquake-lights - rsr.org/moons-on-asteroids * Telethon Update: Please consider helping us reach our vitally impor

The news, RSR style. Bob Enyart and Fred Williams discuss Hurricane Harvey, the terrible death toll and suffering, why there were no hurricanes before the flood, and why Christians shouldn't claim that God targeted Texas. Then for some good news, this week the FDA approved a "living drug" for childhood leukemia as we discuss over at rsr.org/targeted-antibodies. Then, related to today's flyby of the 2.7-mile wide Florence, the  guys mention RSR's standing science prediction regarding the moons of asteroids. Also, RSR's new 3-minute Yellowstone Petrified Tree video is now on YouTube. And we air Bob's call in to a polite atheist radio host about the fine tuning evident during the stupendous solar eclipse! Finally, we've postponed discussion until our next program of this week's triceratops discovery during construction in metro Denver. Today begins our annual September telethon. $30,000 is our vitally important goal. Please consider helping by clicking or by calling 1-800-8Enyart (303-463-7789), or by subscribing to any of the following... Sign Up for a Monthly Subscription: Sermon Audio CDs Sermon DVDs Bible Study DVDs BEL TV Classics DVDs See more Subscription Options Consider Making a Donation: Monthly Donation One Time Donation or: Purchase anything from our store! * Thank You Gift: When you sign up for any subscription or give a one-time donation of $100 or more, we will send you the Bob Debates the Stars DVD of his appearances on Politically Incorrect with Bill Maher. You can subscribe or give online or just call 1-800-8Enyart (303-463-7789).

Post-show Note: By the way, our RSR/BEL YouTube channel is approaching 300,000 views! To help us hit that milestone, you might want to check out our brief impromptu cell phone video from Yellowstone on their now-removed misleading petrified tree exhibit: On today's Real Science Radio program, Bob Enyart interviews Dr. Jerry Bergman on his latest book, How Darwinism Corrodes Morality, documenting the evolutionist's destructive effect on society regarding immorality, child killing (abortion) and the euphemistically named "sexual revolution". See Part 2 and more at rsr.org/jerry-bergman.

Special Edition of Real Science Radio: Driving back from Real Science Radio's trip to totality in Nebraska, Bob called into a KHOW radio talk show. The start of today's BEL program rebroadcasts that call. And here, at kgov.com/ross, we've posted the email that Ross requested as he, as an atheist, considers airing a follow-up eclipse program on the apparent fine tuning of the universe. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Bob Enyart [email protected] Date: Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:20 AM Subject: Here's the email you asked for Ross for a possible follow-up eclipse fine-tuning show... To: "Kaminsky, Ross" Ross, great eclipse shows! Scientific observations that challenge the nebular hypothesis of a gas cloud condensing to form our solar system include these few: 1. 400-to-1 "coincidence" ratios: one of many examples of apparent fine tuning  2. Conservation of angular momentum should give Sun 98+% of spin energy; it only has 1% 3. If the nebular hypothesis were true, the planets, with ~1% of system's mass should have 1% ang momentum; they have 99% 4. Planets and sun should rotate on same axis, but the Sun rotates 7 degrees off the planetary ecliptic Hawking, the most famous atheist astrophysicist who (naturally) holds to the anthropic doctrine, wrote, "The remarkable fact is that the values of these numbers seem to have been very finely adjusted..." [speaking not of the eclipse but of physics generally] Mike Brown, NASA astronomer and exoplanet database manager, says: “Before we ever discovered any exoplanets we thought we understood the formation of planetary systems pretty deeply… It was a really beautiful theory. And, clearly, thoroughly wrong." Ross, the theory was "idiosyncratic". It didn't actually flow from an objective application of the laws of physics but, like with so many grad students' theses that explain the inexplicable, if flowed out of the desired conclusion, to explain our own solar system. Now that theory is solidly contradicted, i.e.,"thoroughly wrong", by the amazing discovered characteristics of exoplanets. I interviewed physicist Lawrence Krauss on such matters. Because he and NASA, et al., say that it's the "predictions" of the big bang that confirm the theory, I decided to write a critic of that claim. So for two years now, when anyone uses the search term: big bang predictions, Google ranks my rsr.org/bbp article (on kgov.com) as #1 or so out of thousands. We then follow the bb model through to the formation of galaxies, stars, and planets, to show where the predictions fail throughout and are undermined anyway by fundamental physics. So Ross, if you'd like a recommendation for a guest to take the "fine-tuned" side of a discussion, we can easily provide you with one, including the physicist/cosmologist who endorse my Blu-ray/DVD/download video Evidence Against the Big Bang. (He also won the 2010 IEEE Cady award for constructing the world's most precise clock, used to calibrate atomic clocks in Japan, Europe, etc.) Thanks again! - Bob Enyart Real Science Radio 1-800-8Enyart on air KGOV.com  -  rsr.org  -  rsr.org/fine-tuning  -  rsr.org/solar-system-formation-problems p.s. On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Kaminsky, Ross [email protected] wrote: Wendy Walsh and her attorney Lisa Bloom now have your e-mail. Confirmed. Btw Ross, after you connected me with Wendy and Lisa, that led directly to me getting a phone call from Kevin Lord, Fox News Channel's executive vice president of human resources (who moved over from NBC). He apologized for the sexual harassment and I decided to accept his verbal apology and not ask for anything else. So, thanks Ross. Your discernment in connecting me to those prominent women really did help.

With today's standalone program (i.e., no need to first hear Part 1),  Real Science Radio concludes their reporting on the science, political correctness, and practicality of preparing for the Great American Eclipse! Bob Enyart and Fred Williams first chastise those claiming mystical significance to the eclipse, then discuss the appropriate viewing and travel warnings, the main astronomical fact (often obscured by the anti-design science media), and the politically correct complaining about the name of this eclipse by the libs over at AstronomyCast. See Also: rsr.org/solar-system-formation-problems, rsr.org/star-formation-problems, and rsr.org/fine-tuning.

Dr. Jerry Bergman, author of 1,170 science papers, articles, and books, has now written the definitive book C. S. Lewis: Anti-Darwinist. One proof of a hundred in the book is what Lewis wrote to leading creationist Bernard Ackworth. "I wish I were younger... [I] think that you may be right in regarding it [evolution] as the central and radical lie in the whole web of falsehood that now governs our lives..." After reading about twenty of Lewis' books, RSR's Bob Enyart concurs with Bergman's conclusion and mentions the demonic character Prof. Weston from Perelandra whom Lewis describes as a devotee of "emergent evolution", the author's term for macroevolution. Make sure to catch all of our rsr.org/jerry-bergman programs!  * One of RSR's Favorite Lewis Quote: From rsr.org/historical-and-observational-science-equally-good... On Scientific Thought, by C.S. Lewis [Christian Reflections, page 77] If popular thought feels ‘science’ to be different from all other kinds of knowledge because science is experimentally verifiable, popular thought is mistaken. Experimental verification is not a new kind of assurance coming in to supply the deficiencies of mere logic. We should therefore abandon the distinction between scientific and non-scientific thought. The proper distinction is between logical and non-logical thought. - Lewis * Note -- If You're in Denver: Come out and meet Dr. Jerry Bergman tonight, August 11th, at the Rocky Mountain Creation Fellowship at 7 p.m. at Calvary Apostolic Church, 5900 E. Yale Ave, Denver, just a few blocks east of I-25 and Yale.

Welcome to Real Science Radio's program on the Great American Eclipse. Bob Enyart and Fred Williams talk a bit about how to view the August 21st eclipse, but they spend most of the show discussing amazing astronomy discoveries regarding the Sun, moon, Earth, and the other planets which support creation and falsify evolution (i.e., the materialist, atheistic stellar and planetary evolution claims). Evidence against the claim that a swirling gas cloud condensed forming our solar system, called the nebular hypothesis, includes that: - the axis of the Sun’s rotation is seven degrees out of alignment with the ecliptic plane of the planets' orbits - the Sun is missing nearly 100% of the spin that it should have if it condensed from that alleged swirling gas cloud - the planets have nearly 100 times too much spin energy, called angular momentum - of the many astounding fine tuning particulars of the solar system and of the Earth, one of the simplest enables this total solar eclipse, namely, that the Sun is 400 times larger than the Moon and it is 400 times further away. See Also: part 2, rsr.org/solar-system-formation-problems, rsr.org/star-formation-problems, and rsr.org/fine-tuning.

* Fossil Insect Ears Sound Warning to Darwinists: RSR co-hosts Bob Enyart and Fred Williams discuss a great David Coppedge story in the July - Sept., 2012 Creation magazine about fossilized insect ears. Darwinists have claimed that, prior to the (alleged) evolution of bats, early insects would be seen to lack ears. Lo and behold though, a study including by a scientist up the road from RSR, at the University of Colorado at Boulder, have found modern insect ears fossilized where they had expected to find deaf bugs. Don't miss our DinosaurSoftTissue.com and YoungEarth.com sites! * Jerry Coyne is a fruit-fly expert and evolution professor at the University of Chicago, well known for his opposition to creation and his website Why Evolution Is True. Bob Enyart is a young-earth creationist. So which man would you think, the evolutionist or the creationist, would more accurately understand and present the latest cutting-edge discoveries from the world of genetics, and which one would be in denial? See for yourself... The following three screenshots are from Coyne's criticism of Real Science Radio in his Nov. 19, 2012 blog, with the third presenting his scientific criticism. Following them is the comment that Bob Enyart posted which Jerry has so far rejected from appearing on his blog. First, Coyne's heading...             Next, see Jerry's fun visual comparison of the logos (with RSR hoping that National Public Radio's SciFri sticks with their logo and doesn't copy ours ;)                 And last, here is the main scientific criticism that Jerry Coyne chose to level against RSF. So the question is, on this specific scientific matter, is the famed University of Chicago evolution professor correct, or is the fundamentalist Christian young earth creationist correct? Well, for starters, far from this being primarily a single-celled phenomena, even vertebrate genomes are so erratic and unwilling to be forced into a Darwinian lineage, that in their January 2013 journal, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences reports that horizontal gene transfer must have "transformed vertebrate genomes." But that was published after Coyne's blog post. So here's my original, contemporaneous reply to Prof. Coyne that so far he has not OK'd for display: Bob Enyart Your comment is awaiting moderation. Posted November 20, 2012 at 8:31 am | Permalink Jerry, yes, you disapprove, but thanks anyway for the blog about us. You claim the same thing that AronRa claimed when I debated him, about the New Scientist ”Darwin was wrong” cover story. The mag says that because of HGT, we should cut down the tree of life. Their specific evidence contradicts your dismissal of their article. You say that: ...such transfer is common only in bacteria, and if you analyze the total DNA of non-bacterial species, not just an occasional odd gene horizontally transferred from, say, fungi to rotifers, you will still find the tree of life branching in a nice Darwinian way. -Coyne Yet NS reported that a UC Davis study: ...compared 2000 genes that are common to humans, frogs, sea squirts, sea urchins, fruit flies and nematodes. In theory, [they] should have been able to use the gene sequences to construct an evolutionary tree showing the relationships between the six animals. [They] failed. The problem was that different genes told contradictory evolutionary stories. -New Scientist NS also reports according to the National Academy of Sciences that: ...ever more incongruous bits of DNA are turning up. Last year, for example, a team at the University of Texas… found a peculiar chunk of DNA in the genomes of eight animals [including] – the mouse, rat, …, little brown bat, … opossum, [a] lizard and [a] frog – but not in 25 others [where Darwin's tree would have it], including [in] humans, elephants, chickens and fish. As a creationist debating leading anti-creationist Eugenie Scott on nat’l TV in 1998, I predicted that the popular junk DNA argument against creation would eventual

Real Science Radio hosts Bob Enyart and Fred Williams concludes their series on this interesting biblical and scientific question: Did it rain before the flood! For Part 1 see rsr.org/rain. Today's Resource: Get the Best Creation Science Book Ever Written! Just click on the cover of Dr. Walt Brown's book to purchase it from RSR (which also helps us to continue broadcasting)! * Check Out RSR's HPT Programs (and other resources from rsr.org/flood): - Plate Tectonics: Subduction Does Not Happen - RSR on the Origin of Trans-Neptunian Objects - List of Answers to Hydroplate Objections - Bryan Nickel's HPT Tutorial YouTube Series - Dr. Spencer, PhD in nuclear physics, on HPT objections - The 360-Day Year on RSR & 360dayyear.com - Jane Albright's Global Flood Article Series  - CPT's Wrong: Magma Below Crossover Depth Sinks - RSR's observation that, "All scientists work for Walt Brown" comes from rsr.org/predictions#hpt, our program that defies the claim of Bill Nye and Neil deGrasse Tyson, who have said that creationists cannot make science predictions based on the Bible. Ha! * The Original Walt Brown Week on RSR: originally aired on five consecutive programs: - Dr. Walt Brown on Evolution - Dr. Walt Brown on Hydroplates - Walt Brown on the Grand Canyon - Walt on Where the Water Went & Where it Came From - The Walt Brown Effect: Q&A * Flood Programs with HPT expert Kevin Lea: - Origin of Comets on Real Science Radio - Real Science Radio on Frozen Mammoths - Liquefaction Made Most of the Paper Thin Fossils - RSR: How Earthquakes Gave Us a 365-Day Year Check Out the Video Too! Just click to order RSR's best-selling video: The Global Flood and the Hydroplate Theory Blu-ray, 2-DVD Set, or HD Streaming or Download Real Science Radio co-host Bob Enyart presents the scientific evidence for Dr. Walt Brown’s model of the global flood, along with the relevant biblical material. Enyart also discusses Brown's opponents and contrasts both the vapor canopy and catastrophic plate tectonics with the hydroplate theory. DVD Vol. 1 1. Walt Brown, Creation Leaders, and Scripture 2. Hydroplate Theory & Scientific Evidence DVD Vol. 2 3. Hydroplates vs. Plate Tectonics Bonus: Origin of Earth's Radioactivity * Excerpts: RSR's Global Flood and Hydroplate Theory: We've excerpted our best-selling flood video which is available in full on DVD, Blu-ray, or download. We hope you enjoy this: * In the Days of Peleg, the Earth was Divided: In our video embedded just above, from 12:13 to 15:21, we discuss Genesis 10:25 which states that in the days of Peleg, the earth was divided. See While the text could plausibly be interpreted to refer to some other type of division, most literally, it indicates that "the earth" was divided.   Zelandia, the submerged continent larger than India, testifies to the Hydroplate Theory.* All Scientists Work for Walt Brown: Check out this update on the Moon! As explained in the Dr. Brown's Hydroplate Theory, the Moon was battered when the fountains of the great deep erupted and launched much debris into space. That helps to explain why the near-side has suffered much greater impactors. Now, from our All Scientists Work for Walt Brown file, interestingly, Maria Zuber, principal investigator for NASA's GRAIL mission, said, "It was known that planets were battered by impacts, but nobody had envisioned that the [Moon’s] crust was so beaten up." Nobody, that is, except for Dr. Brown. :) This statement, All Scientists Work for Walt Brown, appears in our best-selling flood video and we may have first uttered it in 2007 when the BBC reported the discovery of the missing crust in the Atlantic, unexpected by plate tectonics advocates but a confirmation of a requirement of the Hydroplate Theory. Then on the other side of the globe in 2017 the GSA published (See their Flip PDF) the discovery of an almost completely submerged "continent", larger than India, in the Pacific Ocean, called Zealandia. * RSR's List of Answers to HPT Objections: Bob Enyart