Even Alexander Hamilton – no opponent of big, centralized government – held a far more restrictive view of executive power on “recess appointments” than most politicians and judges today. That tells you just how far things have gone off the rails. In this episode, we’re breaking down one of the most misunderstood parts of the Constitution – the Recess Appointments Clause. We’ll cover how the Founders viewed the clause, what they meant by recess, adjournment, and happen, and three key takeaways that expose how modern practices have strayed from the Constitution’s original design.

Path to Liberty: February 3, 2025

Subscribe: Apple | Spotify | Podbean | Youtube Music | Stitcher | TuneIn | RSS | More Platforms Here

SHOW LINKS:

Show Archives

Constitution: Article II, Section 2, Clause 2-3

Michael Rappaport – The Original Meaning of the Recess Appointments Clause

Alexander Hamilton – Federalist 67 (11 Mar 1788)

Edmund Randolph – Opinion on Recess Appointments (7 July 1792)

Rob Natelson – The Evidence Continues to Pile Up on “Recess Appointments”

Massachusetts Constitution, Part 2, Chapter II, Section I, Article V (1780)

New Hampshire Constitution, Part 2, Article 34 (1784)

St. George Tucker – View of the Constitution of the United States (1803)

READING LIST

MORE VIDEO SOURCES

Watch on Odysee

Watch on X

Watch on Minds

Watch on Facebook

Watch on Bitchute

Watch on Brighteon

Watch on LinkedIn

Watch on TikTok

Watch on Spotify

FOLLOW and SUPPORT TAC:

Become a Member: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/members/

The post Recess Appointments: Forgotten Constitutional Limits from the Founders appeared first on Tenth Amendment Center.