What if the most important divide in American life isn’t left or right, but whether we still govern ourselves at all? We pull on a single thread—sovereignty—and watch how it explains the fractures you feel every day: priorities set far from home, speech boundaries drawn by fear, and policies that seem to serve unseen hands. Instead of treating corruption as a few bad actors, we examine the mechanism of leverage and secrecy that can bend institutions away from public consent and toward private control, and we ask what it would take to turn the lights on.

Across this conversation, we connect the dots between blackmail as political currency, the social penalties that police acceptable speech, and the incentives that keep records sealed when sunlight would clarify who serves whom. We look at how narratives shift from open debate to managed discourse, how reputational threats silence questions that voters deserve to ask, and why a republic cannot function when citizens are trained to fear honest inquiry. The result is a framework that makes sense of mismatched priorities: borders defended abroad while neglected at home, public money routed to distant projects, and classrooms that erode confidence rather than build civic memory.

But this isn’t just diagnosis. We lay out a path to renewal grounded in transparency and accountability: unsealing relevant records, enforcing disclosure and conflict rules, protecting unpopular speech, and insisting that standards apply evenly across allies and opponents. Self-government demands leaders who fear voter judgment more than private pressure—and citizens willing to protect the debate that keeps power honest. If sovereignty is the measure, then exposure, audits, and equal rules are the tools.

Hear the case, test it, and decide where you stand. If this conversation moves you, follow the show, share it with a friend who cares about self-rule, and leave a review to help others find it. Your voice is the sunlight.

Support the show

Start with a hard question: if a movement keeps losing the fights that define a nation’s future, is the movement itself the problem? We confront the conservative establishment’s incentives—donor appeasement, media contracts, and social status—and track how those rewards displaced duty. The result, we argue, is a politics that conserved portfolios and prestige while Main Streets hollowed out, institutions were captured, and a generation learned that polite losses don’t protect anyone they love.

We map a clear generational turn. Younger right-leaning listeners have drifted from legacy outlets and think tanks toward writers and communities that name power, demographics, and identity directly. That shift isn’t about edginess; it’s about responsibility. If culture follows power, then commentary without leverage is a dead end. We lay out a restorationist posture: prioritize home over abstractions, orient policy around children and continuity, and place local authority above distant bureaucracy. Love of one’s people moves from sentiment to strategy, shaping what gets built and defended.

From critique to action, we offer a concrete program. Defund organizations that launder outrage into inaction. Build parallel infrastructure—media, finance, education—capable of surviving pressure. Primary officials captured by donor networks and flood party machinery at the precinct and county level to convert energy into control. Speak in plain language about goals and opponents, accepting reputational risk as the price of clarity. Opposition, deplatforming, and denunciation become signals to adapt and scale, not reasons to retreat.

By the end, we position nationalism not as a transgression but as historical normalcy: peoples protect their interests, honor inheritance, and secure a future for their children. The old coalition had its run; the new work starts where listeners live. If you’re ready to trade commentary for construction, tap play, subscribe for more strategic breakdowns, and leave a review with the first local post you plan to target next.

Support the show

The stock chart goes up, but whose life gets better. We open with a blunt question: what is an economy for if not to help people build stable lives. From shuttered factories to soaring rents, we trace how a market unmoored from national obligations turns efficiency into fragility, rewarding cost arbitrage while eroding the foundations families depend on. Instead of reheated talking points about capitalism and socialism, we offer a practical lens: judge every policy by whether it strengthens workers’ skills, expands productive capacity at home, and makes it easier to form a family.

We walk through the mechanisms that hollowed out local prosperity—offshoring core industries, financial incentives that favor extraction over building, and decades of underbuilding homes near jobs. You’ll hear a grounded plan for renewal: trade and tax rules that reward domestic investment, an industrial strategy for semiconductors, medicines, and clean energy equipment, and a workforce system centered on apprenticeships and rapid, employer-linked training. We also tackle the human side of the ledger: the loss of purpose that comes with unstable work, the way rent and healthcare swallow wage gains, and why resilient communities require both strong paychecks and abundant housing.

This conversation resets the scoreboard. We propose new metrics—median family income after housing and healthcare, domestic investment per worker, tradable-sector job growth, and time to household formation—so progress shows up in daily life, not just in indexes. If you’re ready for an economy that measures success by thriving main streets rather than a single line on a screen, press play and join the conversation. Subscribe, share with a friend who cares about rebuilding productive America, and leave a review with the one policy you’d pass first.

Full blog post: https://news.gab.com/2025/11/why-capitalism-isnt-working/

Support the show

The future won’t arrive on schedule when the past refuses to step aside—so we decided to name the problem and map a path forward. We start with the breach at the heart of public life: a leadership class that treats power like an heirloom and stability like a shrine, even as wages stagnate, debt swells, and young families are told to settle for less. From labor policy that dilutes bargaining power to higher education that rewards compliance over mastery, we connect the dots on how today’s institutions embalmed the old order instead of growing the next one.

That diagnosis only matters if it leads to action. We lay out a dual-track strategy that blends cultural renewal with hard political math: build families, schools, trades, and businesses that can stand on their own, while at the same time contesting the levers that can tax, regulate, or crush what we build. Think precinct captains, county delegates, and primary challenges focused on sovereignty, wage growth, free speech, and local ownership. Think apprenticeships, co-ops, and community lenders that turn skill and savings into real stakes close to home. The goal isn’t endless outrage; it’s competence, courage, and results.

We also make a clear offer to the old guard: serve the people or step aside. If the party apparatus has been captured by donors and consultants, it can be retaken—peacefully, legally, and thoroughly—or replaced with something fit for purpose. Along the way we ask the questions that keep us honest: What inheritance do we owe our children? How do we reward builders over speculators? Which institutions deserve to be mended, and which should be allowed to fall? By the end, you’ll have a blueprint for action that starts on your block and reaches all the way to the ballot.

If this conversation sharpened your resolve, subscribe, share it with a friend, and leave a review with the one change you’ll make this month.

Full blog post: https://news.gab.com/2025/11/how-to-reclaim-the-republic/

Support the show

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence and transhumanist ideologies forces humanity to confront what it truly means to be human, challenging the Christian understanding that humans possess an immortal soul created in God's image.

• The materialist perspective reduces human existence to chemical reactions and neural impulses, suggesting no fundamental distinction exists between humans and machines
• When people no longer believe in the soul, they no longer believe in the sanctity of life
• Transhumanism dangerously seeks to merge humans with technology based on the false belief humans can achieve godhood through their own efforts
• Christianity teaches that humans are living souls formed by God, with identity found in relationship with the Creator rather than in productivity or capabilities
• No matter how advanced AI becomes, it will never possess a soul - it may simulate human thought but remains an imitation
• The parallel Christian polis must use technology to serve love rather than replace it, emphasizing that humans are souls destined for glory
• Christians must reject technologies that erase human uniqueness while leveraging beneficial innovations for the common good
• Transhumanism's promise of technological immortality ignores our brokenness, offering false salvation, while Christianity acknowledges suffering as part of the human condition
• The soul cannot be extracted or uploaded because it is not a thing but the divine imprint that makes us truly human
• Our ultimate hope lies not in silicon immortality but in resurrection - in Christ who wore scars as testament to embodied eternity

Support the show

Work is undergoing a radical transformation as artificial intelligence and automation redefine labor in ways that challenge how we view human dignity and purpose. Christians must reclaim a biblical vision of work as a divine calling that glorifies God, serves others, and cultivates creation rather than merely generates income.

• Work was originally a divine commission, not a punishment
• Modern economies increasingly treat work as disposable, valuing it only for productivity
• The crisis emerges as AI displaces traditional jobs and fragments career paths
• Biblical perspective sees all labor as worship when done with the right heart
• Christians must build alternative economic structures prioritizing people over profits
• Education should equip people with real skills rather than just corporate compliance
• Technology should enhance human creativity rather than replace human dignity
• Meaningful work becomes more focused on irreplaceably human tasks like teaching, caring, and creating
• Our worth comes from bearing God's image, not from economic output
• The challenge is using AI to serve our divine calling rather than replacing it

The work that matters will always be the work machines cannot do: forgiving enemies, binding wounds, and witnessing to the kingdom where the greatest are those who serve.

Support the show

We stand at a critical juncture where artificial intelligence will either serve as a tool for godless technocracy or become the means by which Christians build a social order reflecting God's love for humanity. The rise of AI presents an unprecedented opportunity to reimagine the social contract through a Christian lens that recognizes technology as a divine gift for advancing God's kingdom.

• Classical liberalism has fundamentally failed due to its flawed understanding of human nature and rationality
• Modern individualism has produced a culture of atomized people searching for meaning in a fragmented world
• The biblical vision reveals we are created for communion with God and one another, not autonomous isolation
• Technology should strengthen rather than erode the proper order of love: God first, then family, community, and nation
• The demographic collapse in developed nations reveals a civilization that has lost its connection to transcendent purpose
• Christians must embrace children as blessings and make family formation central to discipleship
• A Christian approach to AI and technologies like Universal Basic Income should empower God-ordained vocations
• We must build new institutions and communities that reflect God's design while utilizing modern technology

The time for building has begun. We must reject both blind optimism and reactionary fear, instead embracing a sacramental stewardship that uses technology to serve human flourishing under God's sovereignty.

Support the show

The Neo-Amish Mindset introduces a new framework for Christians navigating our AI-saturated world. We explore how believers can engage thoughtfully with technology while preserving human dignity, community values, and spiritual well-being.

• Rejecting both blind technological optimism and total rejection in favor of deliberate, principled engagement
• Combating "apocalyptic fatalism" that views AI as inevitably leading to dystopia
• Learning from the Amish approach of evaluating technology based on its impact on community and faith
• Applying technological discernment to education, economic life, and social structures
• Building parallel structures that preserve human dignity in an increasingly AI-dominated world
• Resisting transhumanism and other ideologies that undermine the Christian understanding of humanity
• Embracing our role as stewards of creation while acknowledging technology's moral dimensions
• Creating communities where faith and reason coexist and technology serves human flourishing

The path forward requires neither Luddism nor capitulation, but dominion through discernment—using technology as tools for Kingdom purposes while resisting its dehumanizing effects.

Support the show

Andrew Torba explores the concept of the "parallel polis" as a solution for Christians navigating the challenges of modernity and artificial intelligence. He shares insights from his new book "Reclaiming Reality: Restoring Humanity in the Age of AI," which has sold thousands of copies in its first weeks despite the challenging publishing landscape.

• Original concept from Christian dissidents in communist Czechoslovakia who built alternative institutions outside state control
• Christians today face similar challenges from hostile mainstream institutions
• Key areas for building parallel structures include education, economic independence, and media
• The strategy involves protecting children's minds while engaging with and fighting against modern culture
• Demographic advantage: traditional Christians are having children while secular progressives largely aren't
• Christians must develop better support networks and patronage systems for each other
• Building parallel institutions is both a refuge and a beachhead for long-term cultural renewal

Check out the full book at reclaimingreality.com, available on Amazon and the Gab Shop. Remember, speak freely, Christ is King.

Support the show

The episode intricately unravels the implications of the transhumanist movement and the quest for immortality through the life of Brian Johnson. We dive into the intersection of technology, health, and faith, raising vital questions that resonate within our spiritual understanding of life and death.

• Discussion on the transhumanist delusion, exploring idealism versus reality 
• Evaluation of Brian Johnson's approach in reversing aging 
• Insight into mortality’s role in shaping human experience 
• The theological implications, including what it means to be created in God’s image 
• Exploration of the balance between health pursuits and spiritual faith 
• Opportunities for faith and dialogue in confronting modern existential questions 

Support the show