What happens when a burst of conviction grows into real infrastructure? We open the door to ChristianNationalist.com, a living hub that turns belief into practice with clear definitions, searchable resources, and step-by-step guidance built for homes, churches, and civic life. Instead of chasing debates in a dozen directions, we map the whole landscape: biblical foundations for Christian nationhood, the distinct roles of family, church, and civil authority, and a practical plan for building parallel institutions that last.

We walk through the site’s core features and why they matter. The curated library collects the most common objections and engages them patiently with Scripture, history, and careful reasoning. A powerful search and a movement-trained AI assistant help you surface relevant answers fast, whether you’re a father leading family discipleship, a pastor training a congregation, or a young believer learning to defend the faith in public. The goal is confidence and clarity—tools that teach you how to think, not just what to say—so you can apply Christian principles in daily decisions and long-term projects.

We also share the backstory: years of quiet preparation, a sudden burst of building, and a providential launch that underscored the claim that Jesus is Lord over every sphere. With this hub in place, we outline plans for a revised and expanded edition of our bestseller, preserving the maturing vision in print while the site continues to evolve. If you’ve wanted a single, trustworthy place to learn, test, and build, this is it. Subscribe, share this episode with a friend who’s ready to build, and leave a review so more people can find these tools and join the work.

Support the show

A quiet handshake inside an embassy set off alarm bells, but the real story runs deeper than a single meeting. We trace how a convicted spy, a donor class with outsized leverage, and decades of war-time consensus created a brittle status quo—and why people on the populist left and nationalist right are beginning to push against the same walls. The cracks are showing in polling, policy, and pulpits, and we follow those lines to their source.

We start with what happened and why it matters: Jonathan Pollard’s legacy, the optics and substance of a private meeting on foreign soil, and the double standards that shape our reactions depending on which flag is involved. From there we turn to a measurable drift in public opinion among younger conservatives, and the moral shock that Gaza sparked across progressive circles. The thread connecting both is a weariness with endless wars, donor demands that override voter priorities, and a media ecosystem that censors whistleblowers and skeptics with the same blunt tools.

The conversation then goes where few shows do: theology. We revisit centuries of Christian teaching on covenant, temple, and fulfillment, and contrast it with modern dispensational claims that fused spiritual blessing to unconditional political allegiance. That shift didn’t just change sermons; it reshaped policy, making dissent feel like betrayal. When the spell breaks, new coalitions become possible. The left may chase labor power and health care, the right may pursue industrial policy and family protections, but both see the same obstacle—foreign capture of domestic decision-making.

Call it the Great Convergence: different roads, same destination. End donor gatekeeping, bring troops home, restore national sovereignty, and let citizens argue—honestly—about the future they want. If this resonates, share the episode, leave a review, and hit subscribe so we can keep building a space where hard questions get straight answers.

Support the show

The temperature in the room changed the moment we named what so many felt: managed decline isn’t a law of nature, and humiliation isn’t a civic duty. We trace how years of bans, debanking, and algorithmic throttling didn’t bury dissent—they refined it—turning scattered frustrations into a clear program centered on sovereignty, work, and an honest public square.

We start with first‑hand fallout from platform lockouts and reputational erasure, then follow the unintended consequence: a younger, harder movement that treats permission as a trap, not a prize. From there we chart the core planks—reshoring manufacturing and mining, rewarding builders over speculators, and restoring a labor market that treats citizens as stakeholders rather than replaceable consumers. It’s an economic story with cultural stakes, connecting supply chain resilience and industrial policy to dignity, community, and the promise that a nation should work for its own people.

We draw a bright line on borders and identity, arguing that clear membership and predictable enforcement are the groundwork for fairness at home. In the same breath, we take on culture and education: ending bureaucratic orthodoxy that teaches shame, and building schools, art, and media that honor faith, family, courage, and beauty. The digital battleground gets equal weight—if speech requires approval, it isn’t free—so we call for open, competitive platforms with transparent rules and due process. Throughout, we return to a simple claim: America isn’t an abstraction; it’s a people with a history and obligations that bind us together.

This is a warning and a promise about what comes next: a reckoning and a rebuilding carried by millions who refuse to forget what was taken from their towns, their voices, and their children. If this conversation resonates—or challenges you—share it with a friend, subscribe, and leave a review so we can keep the public square open to anyone willing to think, build, and speak plainly.

Support the show

What if the most important divide in American life isn’t left or right, but whether we still govern ourselves at all? We pull on a single thread—sovereignty—and watch how it explains the fractures you feel every day: priorities set far from home, speech boundaries drawn by fear, and policies that seem to serve unseen hands. Instead of treating corruption as a few bad actors, we examine the mechanism of leverage and secrecy that can bend institutions away from public consent and toward private control, and we ask what it would take to turn the lights on.

Across this conversation, we connect the dots between blackmail as political currency, the social penalties that police acceptable speech, and the incentives that keep records sealed when sunlight would clarify who serves whom. We look at how narratives shift from open debate to managed discourse, how reputational threats silence questions that voters deserve to ask, and why a republic cannot function when citizens are trained to fear honest inquiry. The result is a framework that makes sense of mismatched priorities: borders defended abroad while neglected at home, public money routed to distant projects, and classrooms that erode confidence rather than build civic memory.

But this isn’t just diagnosis. We lay out a path to renewal grounded in transparency and accountability: unsealing relevant records, enforcing disclosure and conflict rules, protecting unpopular speech, and insisting that standards apply evenly across allies and opponents. Self-government demands leaders who fear voter judgment more than private pressure—and citizens willing to protect the debate that keeps power honest. If sovereignty is the measure, then exposure, audits, and equal rules are the tools.

Hear the case, test it, and decide where you stand. If this conversation moves you, follow the show, share it with a friend who cares about self-rule, and leave a review to help others find it. Your voice is the sunlight.

Support the show

Start with a hard question: if a movement keeps losing the fights that define a nation’s future, is the movement itself the problem? We confront the conservative establishment’s incentives—donor appeasement, media contracts, and social status—and track how those rewards displaced duty. The result, we argue, is a politics that conserved portfolios and prestige while Main Streets hollowed out, institutions were captured, and a generation learned that polite losses don’t protect anyone they love.

We map a clear generational turn. Younger right-leaning listeners have drifted from legacy outlets and think tanks toward writers and communities that name power, demographics, and identity directly. That shift isn’t about edginess; it’s about responsibility. If culture follows power, then commentary without leverage is a dead end. We lay out a restorationist posture: prioritize home over abstractions, orient policy around children and continuity, and place local authority above distant bureaucracy. Love of one’s people moves from sentiment to strategy, shaping what gets built and defended.

From critique to action, we offer a concrete program. Defund organizations that launder outrage into inaction. Build parallel infrastructure—media, finance, education—capable of surviving pressure. Primary officials captured by donor networks and flood party machinery at the precinct and county level to convert energy into control. Speak in plain language about goals and opponents, accepting reputational risk as the price of clarity. Opposition, deplatforming, and denunciation become signals to adapt and scale, not reasons to retreat.

By the end, we position nationalism not as a transgression but as historical normalcy: peoples protect their interests, honor inheritance, and secure a future for their children. The old coalition had its run; the new work starts where listeners live. If you’re ready to trade commentary for construction, tap play, subscribe for more strategic breakdowns, and leave a review with the first local post you plan to target next.

Support the show

The stock chart goes up, but whose life gets better. We open with a blunt question: what is an economy for if not to help people build stable lives. From shuttered factories to soaring rents, we trace how a market unmoored from national obligations turns efficiency into fragility, rewarding cost arbitrage while eroding the foundations families depend on. Instead of reheated talking points about capitalism and socialism, we offer a practical lens: judge every policy by whether it strengthens workers’ skills, expands productive capacity at home, and makes it easier to form a family.

We walk through the mechanisms that hollowed out local prosperity—offshoring core industries, financial incentives that favor extraction over building, and decades of underbuilding homes near jobs. You’ll hear a grounded plan for renewal: trade and tax rules that reward domestic investment, an industrial strategy for semiconductors, medicines, and clean energy equipment, and a workforce system centered on apprenticeships and rapid, employer-linked training. We also tackle the human side of the ledger: the loss of purpose that comes with unstable work, the way rent and healthcare swallow wage gains, and why resilient communities require both strong paychecks and abundant housing.

This conversation resets the scoreboard. We propose new metrics—median family income after housing and healthcare, domestic investment per worker, tradable-sector job growth, and time to household formation—so progress shows up in daily life, not just in indexes. If you’re ready for an economy that measures success by thriving main streets rather than a single line on a screen, press play and join the conversation. Subscribe, share with a friend who cares about rebuilding productive America, and leave a review with the one policy you’d pass first.

Full blog post: https://news.gab.com/2025/11/why-capitalism-isnt-working/

Support the show

The future won’t arrive on schedule when the past refuses to step aside—so we decided to name the problem and map a path forward. We start with the breach at the heart of public life: a leadership class that treats power like an heirloom and stability like a shrine, even as wages stagnate, debt swells, and young families are told to settle for less. From labor policy that dilutes bargaining power to higher education that rewards compliance over mastery, we connect the dots on how today’s institutions embalmed the old order instead of growing the next one.

That diagnosis only matters if it leads to action. We lay out a dual-track strategy that blends cultural renewal with hard political math: build families, schools, trades, and businesses that can stand on their own, while at the same time contesting the levers that can tax, regulate, or crush what we build. Think precinct captains, county delegates, and primary challenges focused on sovereignty, wage growth, free speech, and local ownership. Think apprenticeships, co-ops, and community lenders that turn skill and savings into real stakes close to home. The goal isn’t endless outrage; it’s competence, courage, and results.

We also make a clear offer to the old guard: serve the people or step aside. If the party apparatus has been captured by donors and consultants, it can be retaken—peacefully, legally, and thoroughly—or replaced with something fit for purpose. Along the way we ask the questions that keep us honest: What inheritance do we owe our children? How do we reward builders over speculators? Which institutions deserve to be mended, and which should be allowed to fall? By the end, you’ll have a blueprint for action that starts on your block and reaches all the way to the ballot.

If this conversation sharpened your resolve, subscribe, share it with a friend, and leave a review with the one change you’ll make this month.

Full blog post: https://news.gab.com/2025/11/how-to-reclaim-the-republic/

Support the show

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence and transhumanist ideologies forces humanity to confront what it truly means to be human, challenging the Christian understanding that humans possess an immortal soul created in God's image.

• The materialist perspective reduces human existence to chemical reactions and neural impulses, suggesting no fundamental distinction exists between humans and machines
• When people no longer believe in the soul, they no longer believe in the sanctity of life
• Transhumanism dangerously seeks to merge humans with technology based on the false belief humans can achieve godhood through their own efforts
• Christianity teaches that humans are living souls formed by God, with identity found in relationship with the Creator rather than in productivity or capabilities
• No matter how advanced AI becomes, it will never possess a soul - it may simulate human thought but remains an imitation
• The parallel Christian polis must use technology to serve love rather than replace it, emphasizing that humans are souls destined for glory
• Christians must reject technologies that erase human uniqueness while leveraging beneficial innovations for the common good
• Transhumanism's promise of technological immortality ignores our brokenness, offering false salvation, while Christianity acknowledges suffering as part of the human condition
• The soul cannot be extracted or uploaded because it is not a thing but the divine imprint that makes us truly human
• Our ultimate hope lies not in silicon immortality but in resurrection - in Christ who wore scars as testament to embodied eternity

Support the show

Work is undergoing a radical transformation as artificial intelligence and automation redefine labor in ways that challenge how we view human dignity and purpose. Christians must reclaim a biblical vision of work as a divine calling that glorifies God, serves others, and cultivates creation rather than merely generates income.

• Work was originally a divine commission, not a punishment
• Modern economies increasingly treat work as disposable, valuing it only for productivity
• The crisis emerges as AI displaces traditional jobs and fragments career paths
• Biblical perspective sees all labor as worship when done with the right heart
• Christians must build alternative economic structures prioritizing people over profits
• Education should equip people with real skills rather than just corporate compliance
• Technology should enhance human creativity rather than replace human dignity
• Meaningful work becomes more focused on irreplaceably human tasks like teaching, caring, and creating
• Our worth comes from bearing God's image, not from economic output
• The challenge is using AI to serve our divine calling rather than replacing it

The work that matters will always be the work machines cannot do: forgiving enemies, binding wounds, and witnessing to the kingdom where the greatest are those who serve.

Support the show

We stand at a critical juncture where artificial intelligence will either serve as a tool for godless technocracy or become the means by which Christians build a social order reflecting God's love for humanity. The rise of AI presents an unprecedented opportunity to reimagine the social contract through a Christian lens that recognizes technology as a divine gift for advancing God's kingdom.

• Classical liberalism has fundamentally failed due to its flawed understanding of human nature and rationality
• Modern individualism has produced a culture of atomized people searching for meaning in a fragmented world
• The biblical vision reveals we are created for communion with God and one another, not autonomous isolation
• Technology should strengthen rather than erode the proper order of love: God first, then family, community, and nation
• The demographic collapse in developed nations reveals a civilization that has lost its connection to transcendent purpose
• Christians must embrace children as blessings and make family formation central to discipleship
• A Christian approach to AI and technologies like Universal Basic Income should empower God-ordained vocations
• We must build new institutions and communities that reflect God's design while utilizing modern technology

The time for building has begun. We must reject both blind optimism and reactionary fear, instead embracing a sacramental stewardship that uses technology to serve human flourishing under God's sovereignty.

Support the show