Can the federal government continue to hold vast tracts of Western lands, or is it time for states to reclaim them? Join us for a compelling discussion as Utah State Representative Ken Ivory leads a historic legal battle that could redefine the balance of power between federal and state land management. With the potential to reclaim significant areas for state oversight, this lawsuit promises transformative changes to federalism, property rights, and economic opportunities across Western states.

We dissect the constitutional authority of Congress concerning land management, scrutinizing Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2, and historical land cessions post-Revolutionary War. Comparing these past events to modern-day federal land holdings, we explore the legal precedents set by states like Indiana and Florida. Our conversation highlights ongoing legal efforts aiming to correct what is seen as federal overreach, emphasizing the importance of states' rights to manage their lands and resources effectively.

State Representative Ken Ivory joins us to discuss the monumental lawsuit and its implications for the future of federal and state relations. With expert insights from Supreme Court attorney Paul Clement, we stress the importance of confining the federal government to its constitutionally defined limits. This episode promises a deep dive into the environmental, economic, and constitutional stakes of this pivotal legal action—an essential listen for anyone invested in the future of land management and state sovereignty.

Support the show