The “Minimal Facts” argument is often presented as the most reliable, evidence-based case for the resurrection—built only on what even skeptical scholars accept. But how strong is that foundation, really? Researcher Michael J Alter examines the famous “90% consensus” claim, the data behind it, and whether it holds up under scrutiny.

Michael Alter resources -
https://amzn.to/4sFnI5I
https://amzn.to/4bKqgYY
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360566228_Dataset_Analysis_of_English_Texts_Written_on_the_Topic_of_Jesus'_Resurrection_A_Statistical_Critique_of_Minimal_Facts_Apologetics
https://www.shermjournal.org/articles/evidence-based-analysis-of-english-texts-written-on-jesus’-resurrection

Receipts for claims in the video - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Z1J0JQp4tpZCJqyyZyFsxVTTjeiCinYg/view?usp=sharing

Support Paulogia at
http://www.patreon.com/paulogia
http://www.paypal.me/paulogia

Paulogia Channel Wish-List
https://www.amazon.ca/hz/wishlist/ls/YTALNY19IBC8?ref_=wl_share

Paulogia Merch
https://teespring.com/stores/paulogia

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIS4cWaXgWpznjwovFYQBJQ/join

Paulogia Audio-Only-Version Podcast
https://paulogia.buzzsprout.com

Follow Paulogia at
http://www.twitter.com/paulogia0
http://www.facebook.com/paulogia0
https://discord.gg/BXbv7DS

Support the show