
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


It can be stomach-turning, watching the Trump administration torch federal climate policy. But what if some of what's burning wasn't working particularly well to begin with? Hannah Safford and Loren Schulman of the Federation of American Scientists' Center for Regulatory Ingenuity make the case, not for defending or trying to rebuild the status quo regulatory regime, but for imagining something better.
By David Roberts4.8
609609 ratings
It can be stomach-turning, watching the Trump administration torch federal climate policy. But what if some of what's burning wasn't working particularly well to begin with? Hannah Safford and Loren Schulman of the Federation of American Scientists' Center for Regulatory Ingenuity make the case, not for defending or trying to rebuild the status quo regulatory regime, but for imagining something better.

10,729 Listeners

1,967 Listeners

1,247 Listeners

401 Listeners

7,230 Listeners

923 Listeners

127 Listeners

2,060 Listeners

83 Listeners

5,530 Listeners

15,950 Listeners

278 Listeners

234 Listeners

120 Listeners

141 Listeners