
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


It can be stomach-turning, watching the Trump administration torch federal climate policy. But what if some of what's burning wasn't working particularly well to begin with? Hannah Safford and Loren Schulman of the Federation of American Scientists' Center for Regulatory Ingenuity make the case, not for defending or trying to rebuild the status quo regulatory regime, but for imagining something better.
By David Roberts4.8
609609 ratings
It can be stomach-turning, watching the Trump administration torch federal climate policy. But what if some of what's burning wasn't working particularly well to begin with? Hannah Safford and Loren Schulman of the Federation of American Scientists' Center for Regulatory Ingenuity make the case, not for defending or trying to rebuild the status quo regulatory regime, but for imagining something better.

10,747 Listeners

1,993 Listeners

1,252 Listeners

399 Listeners

7,244 Listeners

927 Listeners

132 Listeners

2,082 Listeners

80 Listeners

5,576 Listeners

16,525 Listeners

279 Listeners

230 Listeners

119 Listeners

141 Listeners