Episode 176: Self-sampling for HPV screening
Future Dr. Markarian explains the importance of HPV screening for the prevention of cervical cancer. Dr. Arreaza adds some insight about cervical cancer.
Written by Chantal Markarian, MSIV, American University of the Caribbean. Editing and comments by Hector Arreaza, MD.
You are listening to Rio Bravo qWeek Podcast, your weekly dose of knowledge brought to you by the Rio Bravo Family Medicine Residency Program from Bakersfield, California, a UCLA-affiliated program sponsored by Clinica Sierra Vista, Let Us Be Your Healthcare Home. This podcast was created for educational purposes only. Visit your primary care provider for additional medical advice.
Insights into Cervical Cancer.
Chantal: Cervical cancer stands as the most prevalent form of cancer in women globally costing the lives of approximately 350,000 women annually. About 4,000 women die of cervical cancer a year in the US.
Cervical cancer is initially asymptomatic, allowing it to advance to a more severe stage if not detected early. The positive news is that cervical cancer is highly preventable through screening for precancerous lesions or the presence of HPV —the primary culprit behind most cases.
The role of HPV: Human Papilloma Virus, according to the World Health Organization, caused an estimated 620,000 cancer cases in women and 70,000 cancer cases in men.
Cervical cancer is more prevalent in certain regions. In regions with established screening initiatives, the incidence rate and mortality rate of cancer are lower than in resource-limited areas. This highlights that resource-constrained countries continue to bear a burden of this disease. In nations like the United States, access to the HPV vaccine along with routine screenings, like Pap smears and HPV tests has significantly decreased the prevalence of cervical cancer.
Screening recommendations from the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and the American Cancer Society (ACS).
The U.S Preventive Services Task Force advises that women aged 21 to 29 undergo a Pap test every three years while those aged 30 to 65 should opt for co-testing (Pap and HPV tests) every five years. These examinations are usually conducted in outpatient facilities, where a medical professional collects a sample of cervical cells that are later examined under a microscope.
A normal result states that the sample was adequate for evaluation, in other words, that endocervical/transformation zone components are present, and that the patient is “Negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy.”
ACS recommends cervical cancer screening begin at age 25 for women and people with a cervix. Those aged 25 to 65 should have a primary HPV test every 5 years. (A primary HPV test means the HPV test is done without cytology; follow-up screening can be done with a Papanicolaou (Pap) test if needed.) If primary HPV testing is not available, screening may be done with either a co-test every 5 years, which combines an HPV test with a Papanicolaou (Pap) test, or a Pap test alone every 3 years.
How is Cervical Cancer Classified?
Two systems categorize lesions: the Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) scale and the Bethesda system.
- The CIN scale categorizes lesions based on the degree of involvement of the cervical lining ranging from mild (CIN I) to moderate (CIN II) to severe dysplasia (CIN III).
- The Bethesda system emphasizes cytological findings organizing results into categories such as atypical squamous cells, low-grade lesions (LSIL), and high-grade lesions (HSIL).
ASCUS (Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance) is the most common abnormality seen in pap smears. It may or may not indicate a problem, you have to make a decision based on the patient.
Cervical cancer is largely linked to high-risk HPV (hrHPV), mostly HPV 16 and 18, and scientists are investigating tests that identify hrHPV DNA or RNA. These tests may provide a more accurate evaluation of cancer risk compared to traditional cytology. Examples include DNA amplification tests like Cobas test and the Xpert HPV test.
Obstacles to Screening.
Despite the efficacy of cervical cancer screening, many women face many obstacles to testing. In regions with limited resources, fear, embarrassment, lack of awareness, and restricted healthcare access pose challenges to screening.
In Nigeria, a study revealed that women often avoid Pap smears due to a lack of awareness. Similarly, healthcare providers in Ecuador highlighted issues like the absence of screening programs and inadequate health promotion efforts. Women in Peru face obstacles such as long waiting times preferences for female healthcare providers and limited access to health facilities.
In 2022, 31% of minority women in the US did not undergo Pap smears in the past three years; many of these women were uninsured, unemployed, or low-income. These challenges contribute to higher rates of cervical cancer among women who do not follow recommended screening guidelines.
We must mention the cultural obstacle as well. Some cultures do not allow any kind of pelvic exams before marriage. They put a major emphasis on being a “virgin,” and placing a speculum in the vagina may be considered culturally unacceptable. In those cases, the doctor has to use their best persuasion skills to accomplish the goals of care. For example, they may suggest having the mother in the room during the pap smear, using the smallest speculum possible, or other techniques.
Self-sampling.
In 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) introduced a global initiative to combat cervical cancer worldwide. The initiative aims to:
- Vaccinate 90% of girls by age 15.
- Screen 70% of women by age 35.
- Treat 90% of women with lesions and invasive cancer by 2030.
To achieve these goals, self-sampling for HPV testing has been introduced as a viable option for cervical cancer screening.
Self-sampling for HPV testing is seen as an alternative for cervical cancer screening that addresses barriers associated with traditional methods. This approach enables women to take samples themselves using swabs or brushes removing the necessity for a pelvic examination. The option to mail in samples and receive results within two weeks enhances the convenience, privacy, and accessibility of the process giving individuals control over their health.
While self-sampling for hrHPV detection is not currently standard practice in the United States, it has been successfully implemented in countries across Europe, Africa, and South America. Pilot studies are ongoing in nations like Canada and New Zealand to assess its effectiveness offering promise for its impact.
In May 2024, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved primary HPV self-collection for cervical cancer screening in a health-care setting. That means, the patient still has to go to a clinic to self-collect her sample.
How Effective is HPV Self-Sampling?
Research supports the accuracy of HPV self-sampling. A study conducted by Polman et al., which involved a randomized controlled trial, demonstrated that HPV tests on self-collected samples were just as precise as those done on samples collected by clinicians in detecting high-grade lesions (CIN II and CIN III). Similarly, a meta-analysis conducted by Arbyn et al. showed no difference in sensitivity or specificity between self-sampled and clinician-sampled tests for detecting CIN grade II or higher.
These results indicate that self-sampling could be an adequate screening method for cervical cancer. This reassurance may motivate women to partake in screenings knowing they have a convenient and effective option. Ok, let’s say a patient has collected her sample or the sample was collected by a clinician, what is next?
Management of Cervical Cancer Screening Results.
The process of managing cervical cancer screening results involves evaluating a patient’s immediate and five-year risk of developing cervical abnormalities (CIN 3+) following guidelines from the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP).
The ASCCP app is the best investment you can make in primary care. It is only $9.99, but it can save you a lot of time in clinic. Estimating risk is a process that considers factors such as current HPV test results, past screening outcomes, the patients' age, and whether they’ve had a hysterectomy or not.
When Risk is Elevated, Prompt Action.
If a patient’s immediate risk of developing CIN 3 exceeds 4%, expedited treatment is typically recommended. This treatment may entail one of several procedures aimed at removing abnormal cervical tissue.
- Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP): A common method that removes tissue using an electric wire loop.
- Cold Knife Conization: In this procedure, a scalpel removes a cone-shaped section of the cervix.
- Laser Cone Biopsy: This technique involves removing a cone-shaped section of tissue using a laser.
Alternatively, healthcare providers may opt for treatment methods such, as cryotherapy, thermos-ablation, and laser ablation to eliminate abnormal tissue.
And those procedures are typically out of the scope of family medicine, but many family doctors may perform them with the proper training and experience.
When the risk is deemed low, Surveillance.
Patients with a risk of CIN 3 below 4% are typically advised to undergo surveillance with HPV testing every 1-5 years. If HPV testing is not available cytology alone (Pap test) is considered acceptable.
Special considerations for women.
For women under 25, a cautious approach is taken. If a low-grade lesion (LSIL) is identified through cytology, it is recommended to repeat the test annually for two years. If two consecutive tests show normal results the patient can resume screening intervals based on age. However, if a high-grade lesion (HSIL) is detected, a colposcopy and biopsy are recommended. It should be noted that expedited treatment is generally not advised for this age group since many high-grade lesions may resolve spontaneously.
For women over 25, the presence of low-grade lesions or persistent high-risk HPV often leads to recommendations for colposcopy and cervical biopsy.
When a cervical biopsy shows adenocarcinoma in situ it is suggested to perform an excisional procedure to rule out invasive cancer. The next steps depend on the margins of the excised tissue; If the margins show positive results (indicating abnormal tissue remains) further excision is necessary to ensure clear margins. This may be followed by a hysterectomy due to the risk of residual disease.
For individuals who have been treated for high-grade lesions there is still a risk of developing cervical cancer. Therefore, long-term surveillance is essential. Women over 25 should undergo HPV testing six months after treatment, then annually until three consecutive negative tests are obtained. Subsequently testing every three years is advised for 25 years. As for women under 25, cervical cytology should be done six months post-treatment. Then at six-month intervals until three consecutive negative results are achieved. Once they reach 25 years old, they should switch to HPV testing.
As summary, HPV is the most common cause of cervical cancer, and screening must be implemented no matter what your zip code is because adequate screening can lead to a lower mortality. Remember that self-collection is an alternative for your patients, and it is FDA-approved if it is done in a healthcare setting. The ASCCP guidelines are very useful but difficult to memorize, so you can invest in the ASCCP phone app to provide accurate care for your patients. Thanks!
References:
1. World Health Organization. HPV and Cervical Cancer Fact Sheet. 2024. Available online: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/human-papillomavirus-(hpv)-and-cervical-cancer (accessed on 10 August 2024).
2. Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(2):e191-e203.
3. Serrano B, Ibáñez R, Robles C, Peremiquel-Trillas P, de Sanjosé S, Bruni L. Worldwide use of HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening. Preventive Medicine. 2022;154:106900.
4. Gupta S, Palmer C, Bik EM, et al. Self-sampling for human papillomavirus testing: increased cervical cancer screening participation and incorporation in international screening programs. Front Public Health. 2018;6:345033.
5. Ubah C, Nwaneri AC, Anarado AN, Iheanacho PN, Odikpo LC. Perceived barriers to cervical cancer screening uptake among women of an urban community in South-eastern Nigeria. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022;23(6):1959-1965.
6. Vega Crespo, B., Neira, V.A., Ortíz Segarra, J. et al.Barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening among under-screened women in Cuenca, Ecuador: the perspectives of women and health professionals. BMC Public Health 22, 2144 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14601-y
7.Olaza-Maguiña AF, De la Cruz-Ramirez YM. Barriers to the non-acceptance of cervical cancer screenings (Pap smear test) in women of childbearing age in a rural area of Peru. Ecancermedicalscience. 2019;13:901.
8. Sharma M, Batra K, Johansen C, Raich S. Explaining correlates of cervical cancer screening among minority women in the United States. Pharmacy. 2022 Feb 15;10(1):30.
9. Polman NJ, Ebisch RMF, Heideman DAM, et al. Performance of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse: a randomised, paired screen-positive, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2019;20(2):229-238.
10. Costa S, Verberckmoes B, Castle PE, Arbyn M. Offering HPV self-sampling kits: an updated meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies to increase participation in cervical cancer screening. British Journal of Cancer. 2023 Mar 23;128(5):805-13.
11. Perkins RB, Guido RS, Castle PE, et al. 2019 ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020;24(2):102-131.
12. Straughn, Jr, J Michael, and Catheryn Yashar. “Management of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.” Www.uptodate.com, 2 Aug. 2024, https://www.uptodate.com/contents/management-of-early-stage-cervical-cancer. Accessed 13 Aug. 2024.
13. AMBOSS GmbH.Cervical cancer screening. https://amboss.com/. Accessed August 18, 2024.
14. Royalty-free music used for this episode: Lofi-Chilly by Gushito, downloaded on Nov 06, 2023, from https://www.videvo.net