In this conversation, Juliet and Brent discuss the challenges faced by individuals with dyslexia, particularly in relation to educational initiatives and advocacy groups. They critique organizations like the Reading League for their lack of genuine understanding and representation of dyslexics, emphasizing the need for authentic voices in discussions about dyslexia. Their insights highlight the disconnect between those who create educational programs and the actual experiences of dyslexics, calling for a more inclusive approach to advocacy and support.

Chapters:

00:00:07 | Introduction and The Pain Behind the Discussion

00:01:27 | Critiquing IDA and Its Board Members

00:03:07 | Comparing IDA's 70 Years to Autism Awareness

00:04:01 | Visual Disrespect: The Flawed Definition on IDA's Website

00:06:55 | The "Reading League" and Money in the Dyslexic World

00:09:09 | Board-Driven Decisions and the Lack of Approval

00:13:26 | IDA Seeking Relevance and the Impact on Dyslexics

00:15:37 | Who Gives IDA the Right to Define Dyslexia?

00:17:47 | The Scum and Lack of Care from Non-Dyslexic Organizations

00:19:34 | IDA's Focus on Money Over Community Needs

00:21:16 | Made By Dyslexia and the Focus on Stage Five Cancer

00:23:44 | Brant's Post-Retirement Struggles and Made By Dyslexia's False Claims

00:27:31 | The Font Change on IDA's Website and Community Impact

00:29:17 | Defining Dyslexia and the Dictionary Analogy

00:30:10 | The Reading Proficiency Score that Missed Diagnosis

00:32:36 | The Problem with Low Reading Proficiency Standards

00:34:03 | Final Thoughts: IDA, Be Better