Andreas Weis joins Timur and Phil. After some news about Boost, std::format and performance, Andreas talks to us about safety critical application domains, safety in C++ in general, and the difference between safety in security.
News
Boost libraries may drop support for older language versions"Fun with printing tables with std::format and C++20" - Bartlomiej Filipek"C++20 Formatting Library, Parts 1. 2 and 3" - Gajendra Gulgulia"Decreasing the Number of Memory Accesses, 1/2" - Ivica Bogosavljevicusing std::cpp (conference in Madrid)Links
MUC++ (The Munich C++ User Group)ComicSansMs - Andreas on StackOverflowThe EU's Cyber Resilience Act"Why not simply implement borrow checking in C++?" - Sean Baxter on TwitterP2771R0 - "Towards memory safety in C++""Rust Safety is not superior to C++" - Bjarne StroustrupP2739R0 - "A call to action: Think seriously about 'safety'; then do something sensible about it"P2759R1 - "DG Opinion on safety for ISO C++"P2723R1 - "Zero-initialize objects of automatic storage duration"D2795R0 - "Correct and incorrect code, and 'erroneous behaviour'"P2809R0 - "Trivial infinite loops are not Undefined Behavior"MISRA