
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


With partial or shared causation, who is culpable? Which leads to a discussion of someone who is already mortally wounded or ill or injured, and then someone kills that person, when is that considered murder (and the perpetrator would be held accountable) - as compared to being exempt because there was no new "death" to perpetrate (because he was already dying)? And what if one's strike is not forceful enough, but someone else follows up? Or one's strike IS forceful enough, but happens not to kill? Plus, the position of Rabbi Nechemiah, and the assessment that the victim will live after all.
By Yardaena Osband & Anne Gordon4.7
6767 ratings
With partial or shared causation, who is culpable? Which leads to a discussion of someone who is already mortally wounded or ill or injured, and then someone kills that person, when is that considered murder (and the perpetrator would be held accountable) - as compared to being exempt because there was no new "death" to perpetrate (because he was already dying)? And what if one's strike is not forceful enough, but someone else follows up? Or one's strike IS forceful enough, but happens not to kill? Plus, the position of Rabbi Nechemiah, and the assessment that the victim will live after all.

557 Listeners

41 Listeners

220 Listeners

987 Listeners

184 Listeners

544 Listeners

198 Listeners

477 Listeners

3,333 Listeners

1,097 Listeners

523 Listeners

0 Listeners

936 Listeners

497 Listeners

21 Listeners