Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Semantic Software Asia Pacific Limited [2021] NSWSC 785
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Semantic Software Asia Pacific Limited [2021] NSWSC 785
“Stop that Co from selling shares. Right now!”
___
P (who, incidentally, was the Australian corporations regulator, ASIC) commenced proceedings against a Co, and others, seeking to wind up the Co and - in the meantime - freeze the Co’s assets.
P’s evidence showed the Co had significant debts and minimal funds. The Co’s MD alleged they held funds for the Co in trust, out of reach of the Co’s creditors: [2]
The Co attracted shareholders, in part, by offering price guarantees to incoming shareholders - their shares would be bought back if they did not reach a certain price: [3]
The Co had no trading income. Its income came from issuing share capital (with buyback guarantees): [4]
The Co owned a patent portfolio and software, whose value not be realised without listing on the US stock market or being bought by a US entity: [5]
Clearly, the Co did not have the cash to support the guarantees.
Noting this, and despite the existing assets of the Co being minimal, the Court considered immediate freezing orders were needed to avoid them being further eroded: [7]
If the orders were made it would prevent the Co from conducting further fundraising activities, severing its source of funds and rendering it insolvent: [8]
The Co’s conduct in fundraising without disclosing (i) its inadequate assets to fund guarantees, or (ii) the need for a US buyer to realise its assets, were false and misleading: [6], [10]
The Court was not persuaded that it should restrain itself from making a freezing order when that would allow the Co to continue to mislead; even if the the outcome of that misleading conduct was the only source of income for the Co: [10]
Injunction granted.
View all episodes
By James d'Apice
5
22 ratings
“Stop that Co from selling shares. Right now!”
___
P (who, incidentally, was the Australian corporations regulator, ASIC) commenced proceedings against a Co, and others, seeking to wind up the Co and - in the meantime - freeze the Co’s assets.
P’s evidence showed the Co had significant debts and minimal funds. The Co’s MD alleged they held funds for the Co in trust, out of reach of the Co’s creditors: [2]
The Co attracted shareholders, in part, by offering price guarantees to incoming shareholders - their shares would be bought back if they did not reach a certain price: [3]
The Co had no trading income. Its income came from issuing share capital (with buyback guarantees): [4]
The Co owned a patent portfolio and software, whose value not be realised without listing on the US stock market or being bought by a US entity: [5]
Clearly, the Co did not have the cash to support the guarantees.
Noting this, and despite the existing assets of the Co being minimal, the Court considered immediate freezing orders were needed to avoid them being further eroded: [7]
If the orders were made it would prevent the Co from conducting further fundraising activities, severing its source of funds and rendering it insolvent: [8]
The Co’s conduct in fundraising without disclosing (i) its inadequate assets to fund guarantees, or (ii) the need for a US buyer to realise its assets, were false and misleading: [6], [10]
The Court was not persuaded that it should restrain itself from making a freezing order when that would allow the Co to continue to mislead; even if the the outcome of that misleading conduct was the only source of income for the Co: [10]
Injunction granted.
More shows like Coffee and a Case Note
View all
Law Report
23 Listeners
Conversations
847 Listeners
All In The Mind
781 Listeners
The Economy, Stupid
26 Listeners
Politics Now
85 Listeners
Lawyers Weekly Podcast Network
2 Listeners
If You're Listening
326 Listeners
Unravel
803 Listeners
ABC News Daily
128 Listeners
Full Story
172 Listeners
What's That Rash?
247 Listeners
FEAR & GREED | Business News
9 Listeners
Secrets We Keep
74 Listeners
The Fin
18 Listeners
The Case Of
274 Listeners