
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


When person A claims that person B owes him 2 things, and person B agrees that he owes part of the claim, but not both parts - which brings us to the claim of "modeh be-miktzat," and the need to take an oath to avoid having to pay back. With variations on the theme in trying to determine the way to put this kind of law into practice. Also, 3 related rulings, including regarding intention.
By Yardaena Osband & Anne Gordon4.7
6767 ratings
When person A claims that person B owes him 2 things, and person B agrees that he owes part of the claim, but not both parts - which brings us to the claim of "modeh be-miktzat," and the need to take an oath to avoid having to pay back. With variations on the theme in trying to determine the way to put this kind of law into practice. Also, 3 related rulings, including regarding intention.

555 Listeners

37 Listeners

219 Listeners

987 Listeners

186 Listeners

543 Listeners

201 Listeners

447 Listeners

3,234 Listeners

1,074 Listeners

517 Listeners

0 Listeners

932 Listeners

519 Listeners

21 Listeners