
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


When person A claims that person B owes him 2 things, and person B agrees that he owes part of the claim, but not both parts - which brings us to the claim of "modeh be-miktzat," and the need to take an oath to avoid having to pay back. With variations on the theme in trying to determine the way to put this kind of law into practice. Also, 3 related rulings, including regarding intention.
By Yardaena Osband & Anne Gordon4.7
6767 ratings
When person A claims that person B owes him 2 things, and person B agrees that he owes part of the claim, but not both parts - which brings us to the claim of "modeh be-miktzat," and the need to take an oath to avoid having to pay back. With variations on the theme in trying to determine the way to put this kind of law into practice. Also, 3 related rulings, including regarding intention.

558 Listeners

336 Listeners

219 Listeners

986 Listeners

182 Listeners

543 Listeners

199 Listeners

458 Listeners

3,213 Listeners

1,074 Listeners

517 Listeners

0 Listeners

875 Listeners

500 Listeners

22 Listeners