
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


When person A claims that person B owes him 2 things, and person B agrees that he owes part of the claim, but not both parts - which brings us to the claim of "modeh be-miktzat," and the need to take an oath to avoid having to pay back. With variations on the theme in trying to determine the way to put this kind of law into practice. Also, 3 related rulings, including regarding intention.
By Yardaena Osband & Anne Gordon4.7
6767 ratings
When person A claims that person B owes him 2 things, and person B agrees that he owes part of the claim, but not both parts - which brings us to the claim of "modeh be-miktzat," and the need to take an oath to avoid having to pay back. With variations on the theme in trying to determine the way to put this kind of law into practice. Also, 3 related rulings, including regarding intention.

541 Listeners

341 Listeners

638 Listeners

306 Listeners

213 Listeners

428 Listeners

181 Listeners

665 Listeners

444 Listeners

1,190 Listeners

3,248 Listeners

1,095 Listeners

0 Listeners

144 Listeners

825 Listeners