
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Study Guide Shevuot 44
Is Shmuel's opinion—that a creditor who loses collateral cannot collect the loan even if the collateral was worth much less than the loan amount—the subject of a tannaitic debate? The Gemara suggests two possible tannaitic debates that could relate to this issue, but rejects both, since the basis for each argument can be explained differently.
Generally, oaths are used to exempt defendants from payment. However, in several unique circumstances delineated in the Mishna, a claimant can take an oath in order to receive payment.
By Michelle Cohen Farber4.5
180180 ratings
Study Guide Shevuot 44
Is Shmuel's opinion—that a creditor who loses collateral cannot collect the loan even if the collateral was worth much less than the loan amount—the subject of a tannaitic debate? The Gemara suggests two possible tannaitic debates that could relate to this issue, but rejects both, since the basis for each argument can be explained differently.
Generally, oaths are used to exempt defendants from payment. However, in several unique circumstances delineated in the Mishna, a claimant can take an oath in order to receive payment.

1,205 Listeners

545 Listeners

1,461 Listeners

46 Listeners

648 Listeners

992 Listeners

213 Listeners

449 Listeners

1,198 Listeners

3,188 Listeners

1,074 Listeners

185 Listeners

0 Listeners

156 Listeners

831 Listeners