Public

Signs Of Military Discipline Behind Counterpopulist Messaging


Listen Later

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.public.news

Over the last year, we and others have documented the leadership and participation of US military, intelligence, and law enforcement agencies in demanding greater censorship of legal speech online by social media platforms. Over the last two weeks, we have traced the creation of a mass, public-private censorship effort called Cyber Threat Intelligence League (CTIL) to two separate US Department of Defense organizations.

Adding to this large and growing body of evidence is the fact that there appears to be a limited number of interpretive frameworks used by the US government, NATO, and their allies for characterizing their populist enemies. From the Russia hoax to the Covid lab leak to the recent riots in Ireland, the news media, governments, and leading NGOs have framed populists as foreign, crazy, harmful, and undemocratic.

It might seem unextraordinary that one side of the political spectrum would frame its opponents around those four negatives. After all, people involved in political life, whether politicians, activists, or journalists, frequently simplify and focus their attacks to significant effect.

But this limited number of “frames” displays, I believe, a level of message discipline that is uncharacteristic of genuinely grassroots political movements. Having worked on various activist political causes for 35 years, one defining characteristic is their lack of message discipline. Activists and NGOs struggle to work together in coalitions because they all want to emphasize different messages.

That’s not the case in these counterpopulist movements. Across seven years, every major counterpopulism effort used one of those four interpretative frames when they could have drawn on many alternatives, including framing populism as economically inefficient, which was the dominant counterpopulist frame before 2016.

Why is that? And do those counterpopulist frames retain their power? Or are they diminishing in strength?

Four Counterpopulist Frames, 2016 - 2023

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

PublicBy Michael Shellenberger

  • 4.7
  • 4.7
  • 4.7
  • 4.7
  • 4.7

4.7

48 ratings


More shows like Public

View all
The Rubin Report by Dave Rubin

The Rubin Report

14,143 Listeners

TRIGGERnometry by TRIGGERnometry

TRIGGERnometry

1,951 Listeners

Uncommon Knowledge by Hoover Institution

Uncommon Knowledge

2,002 Listeners

The American Mind Podcast by The Claremont Institute

The American Mind Podcast

1,233 Listeners

New Discourses by New Discourses

New Discourses

2,336 Listeners

The Saad Truth with Dr. Saad by thesaadtruthwithdrsaad

The Saad Truth with Dr. Saad

1,126 Listeners

The Megyn Kelly Show by SiriusXM

The Megyn Kelly Show

38,876 Listeners

Ruthless Podcast by Josh Holmes, Comfortably Smug, Michael Duncan and John Ashbrook

Ruthless Podcast

6,054 Listeners

The Victor Davis Hanson Show by Victor Davis Hanson and Jack Fowler

The Victor Davis Hanson Show

8,989 Listeners

Dad Saves America by John Papola

Dad Saves America

72 Listeners

America This Week by Matt Taibbi & Walter Kirn

America This Week

354 Listeners

Conversations with Peter Boghossian by Peter Boghossian

Conversations with Peter Boghossian

216 Listeners

System Update with Glenn Greenwald by Rumble

System Update with Glenn Greenwald

1,152 Listeners

UNSAFE with Ann Coulter by Ricochet

UNSAFE with Ann Coulter

209 Listeners

The Winston Marshall Show by Winston Marshall

The Winston Marshall Show

389 Listeners