
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


After another discussion of Supreme Court ethics and legitimacy (hopefully our last for a long time), we discuss three of last week's decisions. We cover issues of statutory interpretation in Garland v. Cargill (the bump stock case), of standing in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (the mifepristone case), and of constitutional remedies in US Trustee v. John Q Hammons (a bankruptcy case).
By Will Baude, Dan Epps4.8
739739 ratings
After another discussion of Supreme Court ethics and legitimacy (hopefully our last for a long time), we discuss three of last week's decisions. We cover issues of statutory interpretation in Garland v. Cargill (the bump stock case), of standing in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (the mifepristone case), and of constitutional remedies in US Trustee v. John Q Hammons (a bankruptcy case).

379 Listeners

663 Listeners

708 Listeners

1,846 Listeners

1,110 Listeners

6,304 Listeners

6,623 Listeners

7,244 Listeners

5,832 Listeners

3,946 Listeners

3,357 Listeners

399 Listeners

457 Listeners

431 Listeners

41 Listeners