
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


After another discussion of Supreme Court ethics and legitimacy (hopefully our last for a long time), we discuss three of last week's decisions. We cover issues of statutory interpretation in Garland v. Cargill (the bump stock case), of standing in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (the mifepristone case), and of constitutional remedies in US Trustee v. John Q Hammons (a bankruptcy case).
By Will Baude, Dan Epps4.8
732732 ratings
After another discussion of Supreme Court ethics and legitimacy (hopefully our last for a long time), we discuss three of last week's decisions. We cover issues of statutory interpretation in Garland v. Cargill (the bump stock case), of standing in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (the mifepristone case), and of constitutional remedies in US Trustee v. John Q Hammons (a bankruptcy case).

3,536 Listeners

373 Listeners

689 Listeners

696 Listeners

1,119 Listeners

1,511 Listeners

5,168 Listeners

4,865 Listeners

6,292 Listeners

6,579 Listeners

5,754 Listeners

3,868 Listeners

3,320 Listeners

381 Listeners

431 Listeners