
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


After another discussion of Supreme Court ethics and legitimacy (hopefully our last for a long time), we discuss three of last week's decisions. We cover issues of statutory interpretation in Garland v. Cargill (the bump stock case), of standing in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (the mifepristone case), and of constitutional remedies in US Trustee v. John Q Hammons (a bankruptcy case).
By Will Baude, Dan Epps4.8
739739 ratings
After another discussion of Supreme Court ethics and legitimacy (hopefully our last for a long time), we discuss three of last week's decisions. We cover issues of statutory interpretation in Garland v. Cargill (the bump stock case), of standing in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (the mifepristone case), and of constitutional remedies in US Trustee v. John Q Hammons (a bankruptcy case).

381 Listeners

675 Listeners

710 Listeners

1,847 Listeners

1,115 Listeners

6,297 Listeners

6,612 Listeners

7,295 Listeners

5,840 Listeners

3,944 Listeners

3,353 Listeners

396 Listeners

457 Listeners

432 Listeners

40 Listeners