
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


After another discussion of Supreme Court ethics and legitimacy (hopefully our last for a long time), we discuss three of last week's decisions. We cover issues of statutory interpretation in Garland v. Cargill (the bump stock case), of standing in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (the mifepristone case), and of constitutional remedies in US Trustee v. John Q Hammons (a bankruptcy case).
By Will Baude, Dan Epps4.8
739739 ratings
After another discussion of Supreme Court ethics and legitimacy (hopefully our last for a long time), we discuss three of last week's decisions. We cover issues of statutory interpretation in Garland v. Cargill (the bump stock case), of standing in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (the mifepristone case), and of constitutional remedies in US Trustee v. John Q Hammons (a bankruptcy case).

377 Listeners

674 Listeners

703 Listeners

1,828 Listeners

1,110 Listeners

6,289 Listeners

6,592 Listeners

7,234 Listeners

5,807 Listeners

3,906 Listeners

3,338 Listeners

399 Listeners

335 Listeners

430 Listeners

36 Listeners