
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


After another discussion of Supreme Court ethics and legitimacy (hopefully our last for a long time), we discuss three of last week's decisions. We cover issues of statutory interpretation in Garland v. Cargill (the bump stock case), of standing in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (the mifepristone case), and of constitutional remedies in US Trustee v. John Q Hammons (a bankruptcy case).
By Will Baude & Dan Epps4.8
739739 ratings
After another discussion of Supreme Court ethics and legitimacy (hopefully our last for a long time), we discuss three of last week's decisions. We cover issues of statutory interpretation in Garland v. Cargill (the bump stock case), of standing in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (the mifepristone case), and of constitutional remedies in US Trustee v. John Q Hammons (a bankruptcy case).

374 Listeners

660 Listeners

701 Listeners

1,829 Listeners

1,105 Listeners

6,295 Listeners

6,602 Listeners

7,228 Listeners

5,824 Listeners

3,950 Listeners

3,357 Listeners

394 Listeners

456 Listeners

426 Listeners

37 Listeners