SolonHH

SolonHH

By
Download on the App Store

SolonHH episodes

  • Robert F. Kennedy assassination - Explained by the Billy Meier Contacts

    https://videos.figucarolina.org/w/p/qZ3SH7SS6X5aa1vwRyrGVZ?playlistPosition=624 https://sfodblog.wordpress.com/billy-meier/

    Robert F. Kennedy assassination - Explained by the Billy Meier Contacts

    ciri:

    Explained by the Billy Meier Contacts:
    Mysteries, Myths, Legends, Conspiracy Theories, Historical Inaccuracies & More
    compiled by David Chance
    revised July 2nd, 2025

    corneo:

    Robert F. Kennedy assassination
    wikipedia/wiki/Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy
    wikipedia/wiki/Robert F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories
    wikipedia/wiki/Sirhan Sirhan#Robert F. Kennedy assassination
    Important Note: For accuracy, please consult the Contact Report links for date, context,
    and the German language originals. Numerous entries in this document have already
    been superseded by corrected translations online.
    Future of Mankind/Billy Meier/Asket's Explanations – Part 1
    Asket:
    At the time of Khrushev, a new president will be nominated in America, by the name of
    John Fitzgerald Kennedy, however, to be murdered in the year 1963, according to secret orders
    of different groups, and with the American security service, the CIA, having warning information.
    The day of his death will be on the 22nd of November 1963 in Dallas, Texas.
    A second political murder will follow this first one only barely 5 years later, because by the
    same ordering parties a new candidate for the presidency will likewise be killed.
    His death will take place on the 6th of June 1968 in Los Angeles, and his name will be
    Robert Kennedy – a brother of the president, who will be murdered in the year 1963.

    en-GB-LibbyNeural:

    Contact Report 672
    Cartesia-Franklin-Old_Time_Radio_Host:
    20th Century
    Conspiracy to Murder Robert F. Kennedy: The murder of US Senator Robert F. Kennedy
    shows some inconsistencies regarding the alleged perpetrator Sirhan Sirhan.

    Cartesia-Carson-Surprised_Friendly_Support:

    TRUE
    There are indeed some inconsistencies concerning the person of Sirhan Sirhan as a
    result of negligent investigations,

    3 min
  • Rennes-le-Château (conspiracy theory) - Explained by the Billy Meier Contacts

    https://videos.figucarolina.org/w/p/qZ3SH7SS6X5aa1vwRyrGVZ?playlistPosition=624 https://sfodblog.wordpress.com/billy-meier/

    Rennes-le-Château (conspiracy theory) - Explained by the Billy Meier Contacts

    ciri:

    Explained by the Billy Meier Contacts:
    Mysteries, Myths, Legends, Conspiracy Theories, Historical Inaccuracies & More
    compiled by David Chance
    revised July 2nd, 2025

    corneo:

    Rennes-le-Château (conspiracy theory)
    wikipedia/wiki/Rennes-le-
    Ch%C3%A2teau#Fables,_stories_and_conspiracy_theories
    Important Note: For accuracy, please consult the Contact Report links for date, context,
    and the German language originals. Numerous entries in this document have already
    been superseded by corrected translations online.

    en-GB-LibbyNeural:

    Contact Report 529
    Billy:
    … Leonardo da Vinci, Isaak Newton, Victor Hugo and Jean Cocteau are said to have belonged
    to a sworn community that is considered 'The Great Conspiracy of Christian Mankind'. On the
    internet you can find all kinds of information about this under 'Rennes-le-Château', 'Prieuré de
    Sion', where Sion = Zion. Do you know anything about it?
    Ptaah:
    They are really not anything but stupid conspiracy stories.

    2 min
  • Rembrandt van Rijn - Explained by the Billy Meier Contacts

    https://videos.figucarolina.org/w/p/qZ3SH7SS6X5aa1vwRyrGVZ?playlistPosition=624 https://sfodblog.wordpress.com/billy-meier/

    Rembrandt van Rijn - Explained by the Billy Meier Contacts

    ciri:

    Explained by the Billy Meier Contacts:
    Mysteries, Myths, Legends, Conspiracy Theories, Historical Inaccuracies & More
    compiled by David Chance
    revised July 2nd, 2025

    corneo:

    Rembrandt van Rijn
    wikipedia/wiki/Rembrandt
    wikipedia/wiki/Saskia van Uylenburgh
    Important Note: For accuracy, please consult the Contact Report links for date, context,
    and the German language originals. Numerous entries in this document have already
    been superseded by corrected translations online.

    en-GB-LibbyNeural:

    Contact Report 212
    Billy:
    Then a question about Rembrandt. It is said over and over again that not all of the paintings
    attributed to him come from him. Do you know anything about this, since you still concern
    yourself with the earthly art of painting?
    Quetzal:
    Around Rembrandt, whose real name was Rembrandt Harmensz van Rijn, different stories
    grew, even during his own lifetime.
    He was born in Lieden on 7/15/1606, and he died in Amsterdam on 10/4/1669.
    Already at the youthful age of 15, he took painting lessons with the well-known history
    painter at the time, Jacob van Swanenburg, after which he gained further inspiration from
    various other painters and, from this, developed his own painting direction and created various
    works in his typical fashion.
    In 1634, he married Saskia van Uylenburgh, who already died, however, in 1642.
    She was a woman who was extremely talented in the art of painting, but she did not appear
    publicly with her ability but only exercised it in secret, together with her husband, whose style
    fascinated her and whose style she adopted.
    In this form, she created quite a number of very good works, which were indistinguishable
    from those of her husband and which also will not be distinguished for all times.
    She also made etchings in this manner, for which Rembrandt gave h

    6 min
  • What creation is in and of itself…

    https://www.figu.org/ch/files/downloads/kleinschriften/wz_217_2025.pdf https://www.figu.org/ch/node/4679

    What creation is in and of itself…

    Cartesia-Dallas-Fireside_Friend:

    What creation is in and of itself…
    Checked for accuracy by Sfath, Sunday, February 6, 1949,
    Edi Meier, Niederflachs 1253, Bülach

    Cartesia-Lila-Meditation_Guide:

    This is a Google Translation

    Cartesia-Savannah-Magnolia_Belle:

    Creation is not a religiously conceived, imaginary god, nor is it a being of any kind that dictates to humankind what to do or refrain from doing, for it is humankind itself—like every other life form—that decides, determines, and acts upon its own actions. Creation itself is neither a great nor a small being that in any way, in a human, human-like, "divine," determining, directing, or guiding manner, conceives of all events of every kind and carries them out, or has them carried out by humans, etc. Creation is not a being of religion, a word whose etymology is highly contested and whose meaning is not clearly defined. Even in very ancient times, the word ‹religio› has been used on the one hand to mean ‹reconnection›, while on the other hand, the Latin term for religion is ‹religare›, which is said to mean ‹to connect› or ‹to bind›. Marcus Tullius Cicero, the eldest son of a Roman knight, however, interpreted ‹religare› as ‹to read something again› and also as ‹to reconsider›. (Note: The name originates from the Latin word "Cicer," meaning "chickpea.") Cicero was the most famous orator in ancient Rome, as well as a lawyer, politician, philosopher, and writer. He was also described as a social climber and upstart because he was the first of his family to hold the office of consul and was therefore called "Homo novus," meaning "new man." This was in 63 BC, when Cicero held the consulship. He was then the highest magistrate of the Roman Republic and extremely powerful, enabling him to thwart a coup attempt by Senator Lucius Sergius Catilina, who had tried to seize power t

    18 min
  • WE CALL OURSELVES CIVILISED??? [FLCA #43]

    https://nebula.wsimg.com/1a147a47140f47f7911fbb4e928fc905?AccessKeyId=C0F879B9BB56750BC6EE&disposition=0&alloworigin=1&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAYnJpZBExQmNkMWR3dTNoZmN4ejdzdHNydGMGYXBwX2lkEDIyMjAzOTE3ODgyMDA4OTIAAR5BqOcAPZvZH6QtHbnDyjzgrZKCKE5ii_8xOoks6MiMd0v64TEv5QwyYsxIng_aem_Qi2ZqfKIGHCYKQYE9X6kvg

    WE CALL OURSELVES CIVILISED??? [FLCA #43]

    murfai-en_UK-female:

    OFFICIAL NEWSLETTER OF THE FIGU CANADA NATIONAL GROUP / FLCA #43 / November 2025

    PaplaMedia-Noah Greer:

    WE CALL OURSELVES CIVILISED???
    Translation: DeepL / Translation corrections, intro, summary notes by Catherine Mossman / Tiny, ON / November 17, 2025

    img:Screenshot 2025-12-03 162229.png

    MiniMax-English_UpsetGirl:

    What actually determines a civilised society? In the west we define it in material terms, i.e by the degree to which we obtain
    and secure material riches, avail ourselves of technologies, live in somewhat ‘stable’ societies where most people are ‘civil’,
    i.e., polite, helpful and get along ok. But if these ‘stable’ societies start to collapse we soon see more basic survival instincts
    kick in and generally it’s ‘everyone for themselves’ with any pretence of so-called civil behaviour quickly deteriorating. There
    are always exceptions, and there are those who can bring people together in difficult times. Perhaps these are some of the
    more ‘civilised’ ones, even though they could be living in poverty and utter desolation. In that case, perhaps we can define
    ‘being civilised’ more in terms of non-material values… let’s see what Billy and Ptaah discuss in the excerpt below.
    In this conversation (Contact Report 592) that Billy had with Ptaah on July 7, 2012, they examine this subject and provide us
    with interesting insights.
    How we think of civilisation has nothing to do with the true meaning of civilisation.

    17 min
  • Billy Interview 06-04-2025, Decalogue/Dodecalogue - The 12 Commandments / Recommendations

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7UmkmDodc8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qiwswEa58Q

    Billy Interview 06-04-2025, Decalogue/Dodecalogue - The 12 Commandments / Recommendations

    Cartesia-Orin-Velvet_Gentleman:

    Youtube does provide subtitles into various languages, but due to Billy’s Swiss German dialect this at times is problematic and can lead to misunderstandings...therefore it was decided that each video will be translated seperately into English and the subtitles added to the original German recordings and displayed accordingly...Thank you and Salome
    Scott Baxter-California FIGU-Interessengruppe für Missionswissen

    MichaelVoigtlaender:

    Today is the 4th of June 2025,

    and I'm interviewing Billy today about his book DECALOGUE/DODECALOGUE,

    and will briefly read a bit from the foreword,

    so that his answers to the twelve commandments/recommendations,

    not the ten recommendations, but the twelve recommendations, are easier to understand.

    So, "In the writing at hand, the talk is not of 'God',

    but of the Creation:

    The Creation is the BEING and [the] NON-BEING of the life."

    Just a second, let me get the sound right. Good.

    "The Creation is the BEING and the NON-BEING of the life.

    It is the most immense mass of spiritual energy in the universe.

    It is spirit in purest form and unmeasurable in its wisdom,

    in its knowledge, in its love and in its harmony and truth.

    The Creation is something spiritually dynamic,

    a pure-spirit-intelligence-energy, ungraspable for human beings, prevailing over all,

    an at all times active, creative,

    standing in unstoppable evolution,

    all gathered into itself wisdom and love.".

    Billy:

    Yes. And we have to comment on that,

    I wrote that almost 50 years in the past,

    and at the time we were still referring to spirit,

    because the human being had not been aware of anything else.

    They didn't know the word Creation-energy and Creation-life-energy,

    and today, some 50 years later,

    the human being has become ed

    0 min
  • Affirmations for the Consciousness By Derrick Lee - Introduction

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qoSKlHaMAopoMTh2bAjhfn2K6xsxAzf_vuGkQMxKteQ/edit?tab=t.0 https://figucarolina.org/

    Affirmations for the Consciousness By Derrick Lee - Introduction

    Affirmations for the Consciousness

    By Derrick Lee

    Cartesia-Russell-Mentor:

    This book is inspired and derived from the book “Macht Der Gedanken” (Might of the Thoughts) (MOTT). Copyright 2012. Written by Billy Eduard Albert Meier (BEAM)

    The affirmations contained in this book were created from English translations from the first edition of the Might of the Thoughts book that were originally in German.

    (These texts should not be translated back into German unless done by one who is very well versed in the creation energy teaching and is fluid in the proper use of the German language).

    This is an Unofficial FIGU related document which has not been authorized as an Official FIGU document but with which I was encouraged and was granted by Billy, respectively, Eduard Albert Meier to create this as a work done by myself, (Derrick Lee)

    Special Thanks:

    As a teacher, friend to human kind, and, first and foremost as an example of a true human being, I am truly grateful to Billy for my development and my new direction (that I have created) as a student of the Teaching of the Truth, the Teaching of Creation Energy, the Teaching of the Life and as an everyday human being.

    I give special thanks to Billy and all of the other members of FIGU who have helped me significantly in my own evolution and have contributed to the mission to bring the teaching of creation energy to the world and to disseminate it to everyone.

    About this work

    These amazing thought provoking affirmations directly correspond to the Spiritual Teaching of Creation Energy which was first taught by Nokodemion millions of years ago and specifically in conjunction with the book MOTT by BEAM who is the predecessor personality of Nokodemion.

    They may be read or repeated to oneself silently or, out loud like a man

    10 min
  • Impatience and Uncontentment Lead to Hate and Anger, and an Enemy is a Very Good Tool for Learning

    https://future.figucarolina.org/Billy_Meier/Impatience_and_Uncontentment_Lead_to_Hate_and_Anger,_and_an_Enemy_is_a_Very_Good_Tool_for_Learning

    Impatience and Uncontentment Lead to Hate and Anger, and an Enemy is a Very Good Tool for Learning

    English translation

    Impatience and Uncontentment Lead to Hate and Anger, and an Enemy is a Very Good Tool for Learning
    by ‘Billy’ Eduard Albert Meier

    Cartesia-Griffin-Excited_Narrator:

    Impatience and uncontentment are two of the great enemies of the human being, which prevent and destroy both his/her inner peace and his/her freedom and harmony. If the building up of these values is prevented or they are destroyed, then also the purely thought-feeling-based love as well as the goodness and the dignity are affected by it, that is to say, prevented or destroyed.

    If these high values do not exist purely in a spiritual-fine-feeling-based form, rather only in a thought-feeling-based form or structure, then they irrecoverably become subject to prevention or destruction. It must be understood from this that love, peace, freedom, harmony as well as goodness and dignity are of effective correctness and of lasting, indestructible value, only when they come forth from the spiritual Gemüt in a spiritual-fine-feeling-based form according to the creational-natural laws. However, if their origin is based only on material-mental concerns, consequently resulting only on the basis of the thought-feeling and the psyche, then they are vulnerable and destructible. Hence all the high values must have their origin in the inner and true nature of the human being, which is connected with the spiritual-fine-feeling of the spiritual Gemüt of the spirit-form. But this is not connected with the material, as it is expressed through the outer nature, which brings to effect all that which the human being thinks is correct by his/her own flawed choosing and according to his/her wishes, ideas, thoughts and feelings. This happens although it does not correspon

    16 min
  • WE CALL OURSELVES CIVILISED??? [FLCA #43]

    https://nebula.wsimg.com/1a147a47140f47f7911fbb4e928fc905?AccessKeyId=C0F879B9BB56750BC6EE&disposition=0&alloworigin=1&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAYnJpZBExQmNkMWR3dTNoZmN4ejdzdHNydGMGYXBwX2lkEDIyMjAzOTE3ODgyMDA4OTIAAR5BqOcAPZvZH6QtHbnDyjzgrZKCKE5ii_8xOoks6MiMd0v64TEv5QwyYsxIng_aem_Qi2ZqfKIGHCYKQYE9X6kvg

    WE CALL OURSELVES CIVILISED??? [FLCA #43]

    murfai-en_UK-female:

    OFFICIAL NEWSLETTER OF THE FIGU CANADA NATIONAL GROUP / FLCA #43 / November 2025

    PaplaMedia-Noah Greer:

    WE CALL OURSELVES CIVILISED???
    Translation: DeepL / Translation corrections, intro, summary notes by Catherine Mossman / Tiny, ON / November 17, 2025

    img:Screenshot 2025-12-03 162229.png

    MiniMax-English_UpsetGirl:

    What actually determines a civilised society? In the west we define it in material terms, i.e by the degree to which we obtain
    and secure material riches, avail ourselves of technologies, live in somewhat ‘stable’ societies where most people are ‘civil’,
    i.e., polite, helpful and get along ok. But if these ‘stable’ societies start to collapse we soon see more basic survival instincts
    kick in and generally it’s ‘everyone for themselves’ with any pretence of so-called civil behaviour quickly deteriorating. There
    are always exceptions, and there are those who can bring people together in difficult times. Perhaps these are some of the
    more ‘civilised’ ones, even though they could be living in poverty and utter desolation. In that case, perhaps we can define
    ‘being civilised’ more in terms of non-material values… let’s see what Billy and Ptaah discuss in the excerpt below.
    In this conversation (Contact Report 592) that Billy had with Ptaah on July 7, 2012, they examine this subject and provide us
    with interesting insights.
    How we think of civilisation has nothing to do with the true meaning of civilisation.

    Ptaah:

    The question must also be raised as to what civilisation actually means, because what is called civilisation today among
    Earth-humans, states and peoples has nothing to do with civili

    0 min
  • CONVICTION VERSUS CERTAINTY AND KEEPING HOLY ANYTHINGS OUT OF MY SEARCHES! [FLCA #43]

    https://nebula.wsimg.com/1a147a47140f47f7911fbb4e928fc905?AccessKeyId=C0F879B9BB56750BC6EE&disposition=0&alloworigin=1&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAYnJpZBExQmNkMWR3dTNoZmN4ejdzdHNydGMGYXBwX2lkEDIyMjAzOTE3ODgyMDA4OTIAAR5BqOcAPZvZH6QtHbnDyjzgrZKCKE5ii_8xOoks6MiMd0v64TEv5QwyYsxIng_aem_Qi2ZqfKIGHCYKQYE9X6kvg

    CONVICTION VERSUS CERTAINTY AND KEEPING HOLY ANYTHINGS OUT OF MY SEARCHES! [FLCA #43]

    murfai-en_UK-female:

    OFFICIAL NEWSLETTER OF THE FIGU CANADA NATIONAL GROUP / FLCA #43 / November 2025

    PaplaMedia-Noah Greer:

    CONVICTION VERSUS CERTAINTY AND KEEPING HOLY ANYTHINGS OUT OF MY SEARCHES!
    by Catherine Mossman / Tiny, ON / October 20, 2025

    MiniMax-English_CalmWoman:

    eligious perspectives seep into our online research, we need to be on guard as to from where the search engines get their
    info, especially if the subject matter lends itself to philosophical/ theological arenas of query.
    Recently, I was reading an article found on pages 243- 247 of Meier’s German-only book entitled:
    Wenn der Mensch glücklich und zufrieden werden will…
    If the Human Being wants to be happy and content...
    Title of the article:
    Der Mensch muss in sich nach seinen wirklichen Gedanken ufnd Gefühlen und danach suchen, was in ihm seine
    Überzeugungen und was Gewissheiten sind.
    The human being must search within himself/herself for their true thoughts and feelings and then for what their convictions
    and certainties are.
    In Billy’s writing he clearly states that conviction is a personal opinion or belief-based sentiment about something, whereas
    certainty is based in reality, is unequivicol and irrefutable. Here is a quote from page 245 of his book entitled:
    Gegensätzlich zur Überzeugung steht die Gewissheit, die allein von einer gegebenen Tatsache und damit von der
    Wirklichkeit, der Realität und deren Wahrheit ausgeht, die durchwegs bewiesen werden kann und nichts mit einer
    Überzeugung zu tun hat, sondern in ein effectives Wissen und in das Gegebene und Tatsächliche der Wirklichkeit und deren
    Wahrheit

    0 min

About SolonHH

From the publisher's feed

Main Channel Now. SKiLLsSoLoN is just a backup of the YouTube Videos. Subscribe via https://subscribe.figucarolina.org/