Now if it seems like I'm gonna be ranting, that's because I will be ranting. So we've had Operation Midnight Hammer, which I'm being told on the text. Now they're saying on Fox, it was twelve. And like I said, more than six, less than 20. And we sent stealth bombers deep into Iranian airspace, and they dropped their bunker busting ordinance on Fordo and Natanz.

And Tomahawk missiles from US submarines hit command hubs and cyber nodes, and Pentagon officials high fived each other, confirmed zero American casualties, praised the mission's precision and deception. Trump said, we will not allow a terror regime to go nuclear. Of course, the legacy media, which is nothing but a bunch of liars, they couldn't find the correct framing, and The US allies largely responded with cautious support. Israel was very high praise. France and Germany earned urge urged restraint, which they you know, they're they're always restrained.

They don't pay for nothing. And Iran is expected, vowed retaliation with all kinds of hyperbole. It would be something like that. But then enter Thomas Massey of Kentucky. Now let me explain something to you, about this and why I have pro I have trouble with any congressman who's out there now wanting to hold the line in the name of what's right.

When Thomas Massie came into office, our national debt in 2012 was $16,000,000,000,000. And for all of this stuff that we hear from him, because he makes a lot of noise, and a lot of people sit back and go, oh, well, he's just so virtuous and he's he's trying to do what's right. He's never mentioned what Doge found. He's never mentioned the waste and the fraud and the the abuse. He's been in on some of the continuing resolutions which have has funded a lot of this.

And in just thirteen years, we have added $20,000,000,000,000 to the national debt while he's been in congress. Not all of it his fault without a doubt. And I'm sure he has been out there, but, I mean, most of the stuff that he's doing and please understand this. Most of the stuff he's doing is simply so you know who he is instead of one or 435 people. And he has the same protest all the time.

He's spent years turning presidential action into personal rebellion. But this time, it looks a little more opportunistic. He's always positioned himself as Capitol Hill's last true constitutionalist. Whenever something complex arises, he hoists the parchment like a pirate flag and sales into controversy. And this week, he decided to cite article one section eight claiming only Congress has the authority to declare war.

Now in theory, his concern might deserve attention, but theory collapse, collapses under the weight of his selective memory because Barack Obama conducted 2,800 drone strikes. He was in office under Barack Obama 2012 forward, including unilateral campaigns in Libya, Somalia, and Pakistan. Thomas Massie knew he might have been. He was nowhere to be seen. When Obama used military force in Libya in 2011 without congressional authorization, even some legal scholars called it unconstitutional, Massey did not lead a bipartisan rebellion.

He did not file a war powers resolution. He remained silent. So the principle of congressional war declarations didn't bother him then. It only became a crisis when the commander in chief wore a red tie. And his objection might sound sort of semi patriotic but it ignores two centuries of precedent.

The constitution names the president as commander in chief under Article two. This gives him the presidential authority, legal authority, lawful authority to respond to imminent threats of military force even without a formal declaration of war. Congress's power to declare war remains real and essential. However, we're talking limited military actions, short term strikes, emergency operations, proportion proportional retaliation. This falls within the purview of the president.

It's not a loophole. This is how the presidents have, all the American presidents have operated s ...

Alright. Let's go to the phones really quick. We have some, stuff happening right now on Fox News about the attack, but let's go to Mike in Bighorn, Montana. Yes, sir. Yes, sir.

There's a blister in sixty one degrees out here. Woah. Okay. But But but I just want to talk about these so called lawmakers who obviously has never read the constitution because they they keep screaming that Trump had no constitutional rights, but they keep forgetting about article two of the constitution plus the powers power act, which was passed by congress many, many, many, many years ago, and they can undo that anytime they would like to, but they won't. That gives him the authority to use the military whenever he feels the need to to protect the citizens of The United States or his allies or the best interest of The United States.

And I I don't understand why these lawmakers aren't mandated that they take a test and pass a constitutional test before they can even run for congress. So it's not even their constitutional Accumen that they run on. They run on the popularity contest. And once they get into it, they have the power of the incumbency to help them try to stay there because that's really all it's about for them is to try to stay there. Yeah.

And that's why they do it. They do it to I mean, you've noticed the weird fetish of the Democrats. All of them now wanna get arrested by somebody. That is true. But, I do believe that, president Trump is not done with Iran.

I believe that Iran is gonna be hit again and again and again until they finally scream uncle. We'll see. We'll see. There's a lot of there's a lot of crosstalk going on right now. A lot of the the Russians are at the UN and all this other stuff.

But, anyway, listen. You enjoy that 61 degree weather there. Well, yes, sir. Yesterday was in a snowstorm, so we're we're good today. There you go.

Very good. Thank you very much. Thank you, sir. Yes, sir. Let's let's go see what they're having to say about what's happening in gutter.

Is this one round? Is it multiple? Will they be able to get off, more missiles, or is this a show of force? A a symbolic, firing of missiles that The US anticipated that is for the Iranian leadership to show that they are still in control, still in power, that the Iranian regime is not on the verge of falling. That is really the concern, I think, for the Iranian regime tonight.

They need to show that they their own people, this is for domestic consumption as much as anything For domestic to show that they control. Are not on the verge of collapse following that very significant, US airstrike, on their three top nuke nuclear facilities this weekend. Alright. So let's take a look at this this attack. Six ballistic missiles as we understand it at this point.

When you take a look back at Iran's response to the, takeout of Qasem Soleimani, they fired 22 missiles in total. 17 of those were targeted at Al Asad. The fact that Iran just fired six and this attack was much bigger than taking out a single person, and the fact that the ballistic missile attacks against Israel seem to be coming either in ones or twos or very small groups. Is that a suggestion that Iran's ability to counterattack is greatly diminished? That's Well, it certainly diminished in terms of the longer range ballistic missiles that could hit Israel.

We've seen, Israel take out many of those longer range, mobile, missile launchers. They say that they've taken out up to two thirds of those As I'm watching the, live feed ballistic missile of nighttime at gutter. There's no ground fires. Of of There's, range missiles and all Traffic moving around. Much shorter flight Apparently, no ground impacts at all.

Into the Gulf States where The US is based. Situation normal for Iranian bombardment. Many other, weapons in their arsenal. They have anti ship missiles. They have the ability to mine the Strait Of Hormuz.

I'm told that that would probably be their last option. But, if the regime reall ...

Wow. What a difference a few days make. Got off the air Friday. I was thinking, oh, I I wonder when this is gonna happen. Went to a wedding Saturday, slept in, woke up, and everybody was saying World War three was now in motion, which is incredible given the fact that, well, nobody's coming to that war.

We went once and, you know, we we stopped in and just said hello. Now according to Jonathan, Schonzer, executive director of the Foundation for Defense, of Democracies, the nuclear program is no longer. Sources in Israel report with high confidence that this chapter is over. Responsible parties must still remove nuclear materials from the facility in Ishfa, Ishfa'an but that appears to be the final page to turn. This was always gonna be this way but this is why I have always been telling you since day one, please be prepared.

Now what do you have to prepare for in this event? Well, first of all, remember this about Iran. Iran, with the exception of the, the Mullahs, all of the military you know, when the the reason the generals were all in one spot is because they sent out a fake phone call saying that Mullah wants you to be here. The Ayatollah wants you over here. So they all went there because, you know, a lot of times when you fall out of favor with an Iranian Islamic fundamentalist that's in charge of your country and you're in the military, they will strap you to the front of a anti aircraft machine or of any aircraft gun and pull the trigger on it, which, you know, all that's left of you to bury is your elbows.

So they're not exactly you know, they're not out there as let's call them free thinkers. They're not free thinkers here. So so that's not a thing that's happening. They they're they're gonna cut off the Straits Of Hormuz. Well, sorry about that, China.

That's where most of the Chinese oil comes from. Will it affect the price? Yeah. It'll affect the price some, but, I mean, we're still ramping up our stuff. We're still ramping up our our our price, you know, our production.

Our prices are nowhere near what they were under Biden. So I'm not worried about that part of it. What about here? What about domestically? You keep hearing about these sleeper cells and the cyberattacks.

Well, we've had cyberattacks with them before. We had them all during the, we had them all during the, Biden administration, and, they turned out to, to you know, they were phishing scams and defacing websites. That was their cyberattacks. That doesn't mean that's the way it's gonna be this time. Now I know that there's some of you out there, and I saw the text earlier today and some of you out there are thinking to yourselves, this was irresponsible.

This was not something we needed to do. There's only three reasons to enrich uranium. Number one, for medical isotopes which I don't even know what you do with the medical isotope to you. I don't know what you do with the medical isotope. Number two, for a small nuclear power facility.

You know, one of these many things. Right? One one one of these many reactors. And number three, nuclear weapons. Now, I don't I'm not aware of, anybody out there getting out there and saying, well, you know, this is all about the meds.

I didn't hear that. I didn't hear about this is all about energy because they produce their own oil. They don't have to worry about energy. I did I did hear them chanting death to America and death to Israel. So let's say let's just say that maybe a little deductive reasoning was going on.

So, yes, this was always going to happen. We were always going to have to face this, and this was all put in play in 1979. And it's been kicked down they've been kicking the can down the road ever since. Kicking the can down the road ever since. I'll give Reagan a little bit of I'll give him a little slack because he got in here and he take took out, the cold war.

He took out the Soviet Union. That was the big, you know, that was the big boogeyman back in back in the eighties. But, e ...

Wow. What a difference a few days make. Got off the air Friday. I was thinking, oh, I I wonder when this is gonna happen. Went to a wedding Saturday, slept in, woke up, and everybody was saying World War three was now in motion, which is incredible given the fact that, well, nobody's coming to that war.

We went once and, you know, we we stopped in and just said hello. Now according to Jonathan, Schonzer, executive director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, the nuclear program is no longer. Sources in Israel report with high confidence that this chapter is over. Responsible parties must still remove nuclear materials from the facility in Isfahan, but that appears to be the final page to turn. This was always gonna be this way, but this is why I have always been telling you since day one, please be prepared.

Now what do you have to prepare for in this event? Well, first of all, remember this about Iran. Iran, with the exception of the, the Mullahs, all of the military you know, when the the reason the generals were all in one spot is because they sent out a fake phone call saying that Mullah wants you to be here. The Ayatollah wants you over here. So they all went there because, you know, a lot of times when you fall out of favor with an Iranian Islamic fundamentalist that's in charge of your country and you're in the military, they will strap you to the front of a anti aircraft machine or of any aircraft gun and pull the trigger on it, which, you know, all that's left of you to bury is your elbows.

So they're not exactly you know, they're not out there as let's call them free thinkers. They're not free thinkers here. So so that's not a thing that's happening. They they're they're gonna cut off the Straits Of Hormuz. Well, sorry about that, China.

That's where most of the Chinese oil comes from. Will it affect the price? Yeah. It'll affect the price some, but, I mean, we're still ramping up our stuff. We're still ramping up our our our price, you know, our our production.

Our prices are nowhere near what they were under Biden. So I'm not worried about that part of it. What about here? What about domestically? You keep hearing about these sleeper cells and the cyberattacks.

Well, we've had cyberattacks with them before. We had them all during the, we had them all during the, Biden administration, and, they turned out to you know, they were phishing scams and defacing websites. That was their cyberattacks. That doesn't mean that's the way it's gonna be this time. Now I know that there's some of you out there, and I saw the text earlier today, and some of you out there are thinking to yourselves, this was irresponsible.

This was not something we needed to do. There's only three reasons to enrich uranium. Number one, for medical isotopes, which I don't even know what you do with a medical isotope to you. I don't know what you do with a medical isotope. Number two, for a small nuclear power facility.

You know, one of these many things. Right? One one one of these many reactors. And number three, nuclear weapons. Now I don't I'm not aware of, anybody out there getting out there and saying, well, you know, this is all about the meds.

I didn't hear that. I didn't hear about this is all about energy because they produce their own oil. They don't have to worry about energy. I did I did hear them chanting death to America and death to Israel. So let's say let's just say that maybe a little deductive reasoning was going on.

So, yes, this was always going to happen. We were always going to have to face this, and this was all put in play in 1979. And it's been kicked down they've been kicking the can down the road ever since. Kicking the can down the road ever since. I'll give Reagan a little bit of I'll give him a little slack because he got in here and he take took out, the cold war.

He took out the Soviet Union. That was the big big, you know, that was the big boogeyman back in back in the eighties. But everybod ...

We were gonna kick off two a Tuesday, which we've already done, but, let's go ahead and go to the phones real quick. Let's go to Chuck And Mills over here, sir. Hi, man. Down here in your lovely state of South Carolina, man. Just crossed the border.

Stop down here at the rest area near Spartanburg. Thought I'd give you a call. Okay. And, I thought I'd, you know, with everything going on over there in in lovely City Of Angels and all that. And this is you know, I'm kinda loathed to bring this up because it's it's a touchy subject.

But what would happen if instead of the National Guard, what would happen if a whole bunch of patriots decided they were gonna handle this on their own? You mean like the rooftop Koreans did? Something like that. Yeah. Just just we've had an you know, not we.

Also, some people would have had enough. And and I'm not, you know, I'm not saying we should do this or shouldn't do this, but I do think it's a topic for discussion that we should have. What would happen since they don't want the National Guard coming in there? What about a citizenry type kind of militia if they grabbed all their rifles, went down there and decided we didn't wanna hear on those nice police officers heads harmed by these morons? Well, you know And we took to the streets with our own devices, shall we say, and took care of business.

How do you I just entertain me on this one. What do you what do you think? How do I think it would go? How do I think it would would play out. Oh, it'd be done.

It'd be done. If you had, if if I had 10 guys, I could put them in standard battle rattle with a combat load and we could go and clean that out today. You got my number. Right? Yeah.

But we could put let's see. Here's the thing. This is the thing about this. Right? That that would mean a level of hyperviolence that nobody really wants to see unleashed.

The reason the reason it hasn't expanded as much, is that this is all happening aimed at law enforcement and or the feds. It started out being aimed at the feds and law enforcement came out to try to keep them from the feds and then they weren't doing a very good job of it. So Trump said, okay. We'll send a few thousand national guards and about 800 marines in there. And now the marines don't have less lethals.

The national guard doesn't have less lethal. You would know if the National Guard had been pressed into getting active because there'd be a body count. Yeah. I would, yeah, I would tend to agree with that. Yeah.

But, I mean, but when people they gotta think, you know, what is what is a marine? And what is a national guard zone? But they're they're people just like you and I that have Sure. Stepped up a different level. Yeah.

They've they've decided to take it upon themselves to defend our nation at a level that, you know, we citizen soldiers as it might be or may or may not be. Right. They they they take it to a different level, and they they step up. But there's there's got there's got to be a point where the citizenry has to say enough of this crap, man. Enough.

And I'm not calling for violence. I'm just and I'm not even suggesting it. I'm just contemplating it because a lot of my friends and I have talked about this and I don't think it would be the tactical set that did that though. I don't think that would be the tactical set. I think it'd be I I think we would probably see something like that in Washington or Oregon where they don't really have police departments anymore and where they are letting everything just go absolutely to hell.

I think that we have a better better chance of seeing something like that happen there because it happens all the time. But at the same time, what I think we would see would we would see a bunch of homeowners that are scared, that have have taken as much as they can take and then they would get out. I don't think it would be the the tactical set because, you know, the tactical set would look at the the soy boys and the cosplayers and a ...

Well, we were gonna kick off two a Tuesday, which we've already done, but, let's go ahead and go to the phones real quick. Let's go to Chuck And Mills over here, sir. Hi, man. Down here in your lovely state of South Carolina, man. Just crossed the border.

I stopped down here at the rest area near Spartanburg. Thought I'd give you a call. Okay. And, I thought I'd, you know, with everything going on over there and then lovely City Of Angels and all that, and this is you know, I'm kinda low to bring this up because it's it's a touchy subject. But what would happen if instead of the National Guard, what would happen if a whole bunch of patriots decided they were gonna handle this on their own?

You mean like the rooftop Koreans did? Something like that. Yeah. Just just, we've had an you know, not we. That's what I'll say.

Some people would have had enough. And and I'm not, you know, I'm not saying we should do this or shouldn't do this, but I do think it's a topic for discussion that we should have. What would happen since they don't want the National Guard coming in there? What about a citizenry type kind of militia that grabbed all their rifles, went down there, and decided we didn't wanna hear on those nice police officers heads harmed by these morons. Well, you know And we took to the streets with our own devices, shall we say, and took care of business.

How do you just entertain me on this one. What do you what do you think? How do I think it would go? Play out. How do I think that would play out?

Oh, it'd be done. It'd be done. If you had, if if I had 10 guys, I could put them in standard battle rattle with a combat load, and we could go and clean that out today. You got my number. Right?

Yeah. But we could put let's see. Here's the thing. This is the thing about this. Right?

That that would mean a level of hyperviolence that nobody really wants to see unleashed. The reason truth, but the reason it hasn't expanded as much, is that this is all happening aimed at law enforcement and or the feds. It started out being aimed at the feds and law enforcement came out to try to keep them from the feds and then they weren't doing a very good job of it. So Trump said, okay. We'll send a few thousand national guards and about 800 marines in there.

And now the marines don't have less lethals. The national guard doesn't have less lethal. You would know if the national guard had been pressed into getting active because there'd be a body count. Yeah. I would, yeah, I would tend to agree with that.

Yeah. But, I mean, but but when people they gotta think. You know? What is what is a marine? And what is a national guard zone?

But they're they're people just like you and I that have Sure. Stepped up a different level. Yeah. They've they've decided to take it upon themselves to defend our nation at a level that, you know, we citizen soldiers as it might be or may or may not be. Right.

They they they take it to a different level, and they they step up. But there's there's got there's got to be a point where the citizenry has to say enough of this crap, man. Enough. And I'm not calling for violence. I'm just and I'm not even suggesting it.

I'm just contemplating it because a lot of my friends and I have talked about this, and I don't think it would be the tactical set that did that, though. I don't think that would be the tactical set. I think it'd be I I think we would probably see something like that in Washington or Oregon where they don't really have police departments anymore and where they are letting everything just go absolutely to hell. I think that we have a better better chance of seeing something like that happen there because it happens all the time. But at the same time, what I think we would see would we would see a bunch of homeowners that are scared that have have taken as much as they can take and then they would get out.

I don't think it would be the the tactical set because, you know, the tactical set would lo ...

The summer of love. That was actually the end of COVID. Do you understand that? Right? The summer of twenty twenty.

But the summer of love is also it also refers to the period of social unrest and protests and riots and billions of dollars in property damage following the death of George Floyd that particular May. We had widespread demonstrations against law enforcement and perceived racial injustice fueled by the Black Lives Matter movement and all of that ongoing COVID nineteen ish pandemic stuff is five years later, here we are just a few weeks. Once again, before before summer officially kicks off, and we now have in the offing the summer of Cloward and Piven. Now Cloward and Piven doesn't ever get mentioned by the corporate media. Seldom heard from the lips of elected officials.

It's regarded as a conspiracy theory only discussed on AM talk radio by knuckle dragging white heterosexual Christian Trump supporters. But it's real. It's just not discussed in polite and enlightened communities. Sort of like COVID vaccine injuries and stolen elections and the deep state. And we get this from Wikipedia.

The Cloward Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologist and, political activist Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven. Strategy aims to utilize militant anti poverty groups to facilitate a political crisis by overloading the welfare system via an increase in welfare claims, forcing the creation of a system of guaranteed minimum income and redistributing income through the federal government also known as socialism. You can note in their own descriptive phrases the words militant crisis and overloading. Are these terms applicable here today, sixty years after their inception? After those two Columbia professors outlined their plan to turn us into Cuba or The Soviet Union.

They published their manifesto in the leftist publication, The Nation in 1966. The Cloward Piven objective is chaos and turmoil or in their words, a massive drive to recruit the poor onto the welfare role, which is followed by a federal program of income redistribution has become necessary to elevate the poor en masse from poverty, which, by the way, basically, is a really good recap of COVID, Including lockdowns, closed businesses, schools, and churches which required the ruling class to spend trillions of dollars, they didn't have to rectify the damage and destruction unleashed by the same ruling class that then tried to correct it. So in Cloward and Piven terms, a crisis is a publicly visible disruption in some institutional sphere. So how do they create this? Well, crisis can occur spontaneously or as the intended result of tactics of demonstration and protest which either generate institutional disruption or bring unrecognized disruption to public attention.

So last week in LA or as I like to call it, hell a, they became the epicenter of the summer of Cloward Piven. Protests escalated in riots causing property damage and assaults on law enforcement. And those events were not spontaneous. You had pallets of bricks being delivered there, you know, being staged if you will. And, posters had been printed and were ready for use.

The shock troops were mobilized often through help of want ads in Craigslist, generously paying peaceful protesters to burn cars and smash windows. California officials, including governor Gavin Newsom and LA mayor Karen Bass, stood by, did nothing. They did exacerbate things but, you know, blaming Trump for their incompetence, reminiscent of their response to the Pacific Palisades fire. Who are these, and this is a good question, who are these spontaneous protesters and impoverished immigrants fighting against the man? So here we have a guy named Tony Suruga who's referred to as an Internet sleuth and CIA contractor.

I always I I like it when they say sleuth instead of detective. He utilized GPS phone data to identify individuals waving Mexican and Palestinian flags last week in LA in LA. At ...

The summer of love. That was actually the end of COVID. You understand that. Right? The summer of twenty twenty.

But the summer of love is also it also refers to the period of social unrest and protests and riots and billions of dollars in property damage following the death of George Floyd that particular May. We had widespread demonstrations against law enforcement and perceived racial injustice fueled by the Black Lives Matter movement and all of that ongoing COVID nineteen ish pandemic stuff is five years later, here we are just a few weeks. Once again, before before summer officially kicks off, and we now have in the offing the summer of Cloward and Piven. Now Cloward and Piven doesn't ever get mentioned by the corporate media. Seldom heard from the lips of elected officials.

It's regarded as a conspiracy theory only discussed on AM talk radio by knuckle dragging white heterosexual Christian Trump supporters. But it's real. It's just not discussed in polite and enlightened communities. Sort of like COVID vaccine injuries and stolen elections and the deep state. And we get this from Wikipedia.

The Cloward Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologist and, political activist Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven. Strategy aims to utilize militant anti poverty groups to facilitate a political crisis by overloading the welfare system via an increase in welfare claims, forcing the creation of a system of guaranteed minimum income and redistributing income through the federal government, also known as socialism. You can note in their own descriptive phrases the words militant crisis and overloading. Are these terms applicable here today sixty years after their inception? After those two Columbia professors outlined their plan to turn us into Cuba or The Soviet Union.

They published their manifesto in the leftist publication, The Nation in 1966. The Cloward Piven objective is chaos and turmoil or in their words, a massive drive to recruit the poor onto the welfare role, which is followed by a federal program of income redistribution has become necessary to elevate the poor en masse from poverty, which, by the way, basically, is a really good recap of COVID. Including lockdowns, closed businesses, schools, and churches, which required the ruling class to spend trillions of dollars, they didn't have to rectify the damage and destruction unleashed by the same ruling class that then tried to correct it. So in Cloward and Piven terms, a crisis is a publicly visible disruption in some institutional sphere. So how do they create this?

Well, crisis can occur spontaneously or as the intended result of tactics of demonstration and protest which either generate institutional disruption or bring unrecognized disruption to public attention. So last week in LA or as I like to call it, hell a, they became the epicenter of the summer of Cloward Piven. Protests escalated in riots causing property damage and assaults on law enforcement and those events were not spontaneous. You had pallets of bricks being delivered there, you know, being staged if you will. And, posters had been printed and were ready for use.

The shock troops were mobilized often through help of want ads in Craigslist, generously paying peaceful protesters to burn cars and smash windows. California officials, including governor Gavin Newsom and LA mayor Karen Bass, stood by, did nothing. They did exacerbate things, but, you know, blaming Trump for their incompetence, reminiscent of their response to the Pacific Palisades fire. Who are these and this is a good question. Who are these spontaneous protesters and impoverished immigrants fighting against the man?

So here we have a guy named Tony Suruga who's referred to as an Internet sleuth and CIA contractor. I always I I like it when they say sleuth instead of detective. He utilized GPS phone data to identify individuals waving Mexican and Palestinian flags last week in LA in LA. At le ...

Everything has a, a sell by date. Everybody. Everything ends. Everything changes. And so it is with the mullahs because it appears they may have outlived their usefulness.

It appears they may have been useful idiots for some period of time. You see, the attack, the first attack by Israel basically crippled them for the most part. Yes. They're still launching missiles and they're still doing what they can do. And Israel is they're probably counting how many missiles are coming at them because they probably also know how many missiles they had to begin with.

So we're now in this week long window where we may wake up one morning between now and the June 24 and find out that the Ayatollahs have been consigned to the desert dust bin of history. And depending on who you talk to and who you're listening to on any given day, there's some that think it was designed to be this way. Because when you look at our position with the Islamic regime since 1978, it has all the earmarks of a sponsor client relationship or if you will, a handler asset relationship. The Washington establishment has always used and played the mullahs. They've been very convenient.

You know, they are a band of venal, amoral, foe fundamentalist serving as the counterpoint to the other powers in the region, Israel and the Sunni Arab states. Regional balance, low simmering conflict, sanctions leading to smuggling, graft, low grade hot skirmishes. That was the deal. And I think this the deep state feels like they have gotten their money's worth out of it. But then on 10/07/2023, which is at or ending in the Jewish calendar, Yahai Sinwar or Yahai Sinwar decided to go rogue and take advantage of Israeli complacency all without the go ahead from Khomeini.

So, yeah, Sinwar could argue that keeping operational secure secrecy was too important to coordinate with his patron and with his fellow proxy allies, Hezbollah and Houthi, but this was still an existential error. Now the deep state realized that Iran could not control their proxies. Too weak to properly control them. And at the same time, if Iran were to progress to nuclear capability, it would then be too strong. So in their conventional sense, too weak and in a nuclear sense, they would be too strong.

They would have blown up the regional balance. So beloved, MDC. Either by using the bomb or by using its nuclear blackmail backing to coordinate an all out proxy invasion of Israel and or Saudi Arabia at all. So now the stopwatch has been started for the Mullahs and the strongest supporters of the Mullahs within the deep state could hold on and try to massage things during the Biden administration allowing Israel to decapitate Hezbollah and regime change in Syria and Assad exiled to Russia all while protecting the Iran regime and allowing the Houthi emergence as a replacement of sorts for Hezbollah and Hamas, but then came Trump. Then came Trump.

Once Trump came back in the office, that element within the deep state lost power and influence. And Trump seemingly has co opted the pro Iran camp by drawing them into his administration, giving them illusions of influence, and then simply castrating him. Tulsi and those who coordinate the Tucker, Candace, etcetera social media clown contingent were given a lot of rope through the first hundred and fifty days or so of Trump 47. And by the end of this week, they should all be metaphorically hanging from said rope. And that's what Trump does.

He he draws them in and he controls them and he gives them an opportunity to make, you know, make fools out of themselves. Trump is a poker player. His candidacy could be understood that way. You know, he he sat at the New York real estate gaming table and bluffed off weak dealt cards to an occasional win and a certain level of success. And but as a leader of the strongest country in the world, he's always got a good hand when when sitting in the geopolitical game theory table.

So now we get to see what kind of a player he can be ...

Everything has a, a sell by date. Everybody. Everything ends. Everything changes. And so it is with the Mullahs because it appears they may have outlived their usefulness.

It appears they may have been useful idiots for some period of time. You see, the attack, the first attack by Israel basically crippled them for the most part. Yes. They're still launching missiles and they're still doing what they can do. And Israel is, they're probably counting how many missiles are coming at them because they probably also know how many missiles they had to begin with.

So we're now in this week long window where we may wake up one morning between now and the June 24 and find out that the Ayatollahs have been consigned to the desert dust bin of history. And depending on who you talk to and who you're listening to on any given day, there's some that think it was designed to be this way. Because when you look at our position with the Islamic regime since 1978, it has all the earmarks of a sponsor client relationship or if you will, a handler asset relationship. The Washington establishment has always used and played the Mullahs. They've been very convenient.

You know, they are a band of venal, amoral, foe, fundamentalist serving as the counterpoint to the other powers in the region, Israel and the Sunni Arab states. Regional balance, low simmering conflict, sanctions leading to smuggling, graft, low grade hot skirmishes. That was the deal. And I think this the deep state feels like they have gotten their money's worth out of it. But then on 10/07/2023, which is or ending in the Jewish calendar, Yahi Sinwar or Yaya Sinwar decided to go rogue and take advantage of Israeli complacency, all without the go ahead from Khomeini.

So, yeah, Sinwar could argue that keeping operational secure secrecy was too important to coordinate with his patron and with his fellow proxy allies, Hezbollah and Houthi, but this was still an existential error. Now the deep state realized that Iran could not control their proxies. Too weak to properly control them. And at the same time, if Iran were to progress to nuclear capability, it would then be too strong. So in their conventional sense, too weak and in a nuclear sense, they would be too strong.

They would have blown up the regional balance so beloved in DC either by using the bomb or by using its nuclear blackmail backing to coordinate an all out proxy invasion of Israel and or Saudi Arabia at all. So now the stopwatch has been started for the Mullahs. And the strongest supporters of the Mullahs within the deep state could hold on and try to massage things during the Biden administration allowing Israel to decapitate Hezbollah and regime change in Syria and Assad exiled to Russia all while protecting the Iran regime and allowing the Houthi emergence as a replacement of sorts for Hezbollah and Hamas, but then came Trump. Then came Trump. Once Trump came back in the office, that element within the deep state lost power and influence.

And Trump seemingly has co opted the pro Iran camp by drawing them into his administration, giving them illusions of influence, and then simply castrating them. Tulsi and those who coordinate the Tucker, Candace, etcetera social media clown contingent were given a lot of rope through the first hundred and fifty days or so of Trump 47. And by the end of this week, they should all be metaphorically hanging from said rope. That's what Trump does. He he draws them in and he controls them and he gives them an opportunity to make, you know, make fools out of themselves.

Trump is a poker player. His candidacy could be understood that way. You know, he he sat at the New York real estate gaming table and bluffed off weak dealt cards to an occasional win and a certain level of success. And but as a leader of the strongest country in the world, he's always got a good hand, what, when sitting in the geopolitical game theory table. So now we get to see what kind of a player he can be whe ...