Subaru

At the 2025 Japan Mobility Show, Subaru has revealed its vision of the future – and it isn't a full-electric one. Under the theme "Driving the Subaru Difference," the brand unveiled two STI concepts: the battery-powered Performance-E STI and the combustion-powered Performance-B STI. Yes, high-octane is still the name of Subaru's game. And while both point toward Subaru's next chapter, the latter stands out for looking unusually complete.

In the metal, the Performance-B STI Concept feels less like a theoretical showpiece and more like something the brand could easily greenlight. Compact, muscular, and unmistakably Subaru, it sits low and wide, with crisp bodywork and rally-bred aggression. Between its flared arches, hood scoop, and gigantic gloss-black rear wing, the car looks ready for production. It's the kind of concept that doesn't need to shout to make its point – it simply looks like it belongs on the road.

Jacob Oliva/Autoblog

Subaru says the Performance-B STI embodies its "Performance Scene," combining power, control, and usability. Beneath the sharp exterior lies a turbocharged horizontally opposed engine mated to the brand's Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive – the same formula that built Subaru's reputation. No specs were shared, but the setup speaks to continuity rather than nostalgia.

The design is assertive without being outlandish. A bold front bumper, black mesh grille, and angular LED headlights set the tone, while the side skirts and wheel arches emphasize width and stance. The rear diffuser and dual exhaust outlets add a motorsport edge. It's easy to immediately draw comparison to the Toyota GR Corolla and Honda Civic Type R, and rightly so – the Subaru feels like a credible rival waiting with massive wings.

Even without interior details, the car gives off the impression of being functional and focused. The Performance-B isn't flashy; it's simply perfect for what it intends to do – channeling the spirit of the WRX STI through a cleaner, more mature lens.

Jacob Oliva/Autoblog

Sharing the stage was the Performance-E STI Concept, Subaru's take on a future electric performance car. The design is sleeker, lower, and more sculpted, emphasizing aerodynamics and efficiency. Subaru describes it as a study that blends enjoyment with peace of mind, pointing to how it envisions its EV lineup evolving.

While the Performance-E represents what's ahead, the Performance-B STI serves as a reminder that Subaru's identity still has mechanical depth. Together, they show a brand looking forward – but not forgetting the value of a good engine note.

Jacob Oliva/Autoblog

Earlier this month, Subaru teased us with what could be the future of the brand. While some carmakers turn up to motor shows with slick shapes and polite smiles. Subaru, however, turned up to the Japan Mobility Show 2025 with a garage full of glorious lunacy. 

There’s an electric sports car, a petrol-powered STI concept, a couple of mud-hungry off-roaders, and even a resurrected 1983 wagon that looks ready for both a rally stage and a time warp. This is Subaru unleashed. A cocktail of future tech, old-school grit, and utter driver obsession.

Jacob Oliva/Autoblog

First, they showcased the Performance-E STI Concept, Subaru’s idea of the future performance car. It’s not an appliance for saving the planet but a proper sports machine with rally-inspired lines and the stance of something that’s just been dared to behave itself. 

Subaru promises an “intuitive, exhilarating drive,” which, translated, means grip, balance, and a happy tail when the mood strikes. Inside, it’s futuristic but familiar: snug, practical, and unapologetically built for driving. Think WRX reborn for the electric age.

Jacob Oliva/Autoblog

Front and centre is the Performance-B STI Concept, the brand’s middle finger to the idea that the internal combustion engine is dead. This thing keeps Subaru’s greatest hits: a horizontally-opposed boxer engine, Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive, and the kind of traction that could climb a cliff.

It’s not just nostalgia; it’s a bridge between Subaru’s rallying past and its electrified future. The STI treatment suggests plenty of power, precision, and that signature Subaru rumble that EVs just can’t replicate. It’s the automotive equivalent of turning up the volume on a rock guitar solo while the rest of the world whispers about range anxiety.

Subaru

The Subaru Trailseeker is the second all-electric SUV in Subaru’s growing BEV lineup, and perhaps its most interesting yet. The name alone sounds like an invitation to drive straight into the wilderness. Subaru claims it “combines the precise driving control unique to BEVs with SUV practicality,” which means torque-rich electric performance wrapped in adventure-ready packaging.

Built for both the weekday commute and the weekend climb to somewhere with no Wi-Fi, the Trailseeker feels like Subaru’s sweet spot, a vehicle for those who want adventure without burning fuel (or bridges). Expect clever traction management, smart energy use, and just enough rugged design to make Land Rovers nervous.

Subaru’s Wilderness badge is fast becoming a cult favorite, and at this show, the brand doubled down. The Forester Wilderness Prototype gets beefed-up bumpers, widened wheel arches, and fog lamps big enough to illuminate an entire campsite. It’s an SUV that doesn’t just look tough but is actually quite the contender. 

Meanwhile, the Outback Wilderness Prototype carries forward Subaru’s “in harmony with nature” mantra but gives it more ground clearance and even more muscle. Think of it as the automotive version of hiking boots that can also run a marathon. Together, the two prototypes expand Subaru’s reputation as the go-anywhere brand that actually means it.

Subaru

And now for the wildcard — the 1983 Subaru GL Family Huckster. Originally a humble family wagon, now a motorsport-built monster. Revived by Subaru of America’s motorsports division, the Huckster pays tribute to the 1983 GL Wagon but injects it with modern technology, performance upgrades, and an attitude straight out of a Ken Block video.

It’s boxy, it’s brash, and it’s absolutely glorious. The Huckster is a celebration of Subaru’s quirky, indomitable spirit. It looks like something that could win a rally stage in the morning, then pick up groceries in the afternoon, if it doesn’t terrify everyone in the parking lot first.

In the same week, I found myself tasked with daily driving the 2026 Honda CR-V TrailSport Hybrid at home, and doing a quick hop down to Oregon to test out the all-new 2026 Subaru Forester Wilderness. As the two adventure-ready compact crossovers are pitted directly against each other on the market, I decided to use the opportunity to get a sense of where each of them shone when compared with one another, and where they faltered. So, at the end of my week, after returning from driving the Forester Wilderness in Oregon and handing back the keys to the CR-V TrailSport Hybrid, I found myself pondering a complicated question: which one would I rather have?

2026 Honda CR-V TrailSport Hybrid

Cole Attisha

The truth is, I still haven't quite made up my mind. Both of these crossovers, despite competing directly against each other in the same segment, have their own distinct pros and cons. Whether I'd buy one over the other would depend entirely on my specific lifestyle and what I'd realistically intend to do with either one of them. There's also an entire field of rivals from other brands out there, such as the Toyota RAV4 Woodland Edition, the Nissan Rogue Rock Creek Edition, the Hyundai Tucson XRT AWD, and the Ford Bronco Sport Badlands. So, instead of plainly stating, "I'd have X over Y, because of this one specific reason that appeals to me but might not appeal to anyone else," I've decided to share with you what I liked most about each of these respective "soft-roaders," as well as what I disliked most, and attempt to provide a sense of what type of buyer each of these appeals to, so that you can make your own educated decision about which one is the "real winner" based on how well each of these crossovers suits your needs and intentions.

2026 Honda CR-V TrailSport Hybrid

Cole Attisha

At 8.2 inches, the Honda CR-V TrailSport Hybrid not only offers less ground clearance than the Subaru Forester Wilderness (at 9.3 inches), but it, in fact, offers even less ground clearance than the standard Forester, which boasts 8.7 inches. The Subaru also beats out the CR-V when it comes to approach angle and departure angle, all vital metrics for when paved roads are left in the dust. The Forester Wilderness can also tow more—way more—with a maximum tow capacity rating of 3,500 pounds, compared to the CR-V TrailSport Hybrid's 1,000-pound max capacity (the lowest of its segment). Another on-paper blow for the CR-V is its 3,900-pound curb weight, which is again beaten by the Forester's 3,675-pound relative lightness (the lightest of its segment, in fact). The Subaru also provides an all-terrain spare tire, whereas the CR-V has no spare tire at all.

2026 Honda CR-V TrailSport Hybrid

Cole Attisha

On paper, then, the Forester Wilderness blows the CR-V TrailSport out of the water when it actually comes to getting down and dirty in the mud—or whatever other unpaved terrain you'd like to throw at it. The leg up that the Forester boasts on its spec sheets translates into real-world use, as well, as I found myself tackling steep, boulderous terrain with the Forester Wilderness that I dared not even attempt with the CR-V. There is no denying that if tackling seriously rough terrain was on my agenda, the Forester Wilderness would be the obvious candidate over the CR-V TrailSport Hybrid, full stop.

Above and beyond the standard Forester, Subaru has given the Wilderness model retuned off-road drive modes, increased the ground clearance, revised bumper designs for improved approach and departure angles, a revised final drive ratio, updated differentials, increased roof rail capacity, increased underbody protection, and an all-terrain spare tire. Above and beyond the standard CR-V Hybrid, Honda has given the CR-V TrailSport all-terrain tires and made minor aesthetic changes to the exterior to make it look tougher. That's it. So, it seems the TrailSport package is for buyers who don't take the "off-roader roleplay" too seriously and are looking for a slightly edgier look to complement their soft yet friendly crossover. Doesn't that make the TrailSport model essentially pointless?

2026 Honda CR-V TrailSport Hybrid

Cole Attisha

Now, if you aren't planning to scale mountains, wade through streams, or trudge through thick mud, then stick around and hear me out, because the CR-V TrailSport Hybrid isn't exactly a lost cause just because it's not nearly as rugged as the Forester Wilderness. What if, instead of a hardened off-roader, you're simply in the market for a family-friendly, daily drivable compact crossover that's both efficient and roomy, and can easily tackle seasonal drives to the occasional ski resort, fishing cabin, or coastal surf destination? If the majority of your time behind the wheel of your crossover is destined to be spent on paved roads, then perhaps the CR-V TrailSport Hybrid is the adventure-ready crossover that's right for you.

Simply put, the Honda CR-V TrailSport Hybrid has road manners that the Forester Wilderness can't compete with. Yes, its all-terrain tires make more noise than standard tires would, and come at the cost of minor fuel efficiency losses, but generally speaking, the CR-V Hybrid is the better-handling car when it comes to cornering, accelerating, and braking. Where the Subaru feels more refined off the road, the Honda feels more refined on the road. The Forester's anemic 2.5-liter Boxer engine pumps out just 180-horsepower and 178 lb-ft of torque. In contrast, the CR-V's 2.0-liter dual-electric-motor hybrid powertrain boasts a combined 204 horsepower and 247 lb-ft of torque. Not only does the Honda boast significantly greater power figures, but it also outperforms the Forester in fuel economy, with an impressive 40 mpg city/34 mpg highway/37 mpg combined fuel efficiency rating, compared to the Forester's 24 mpg city/28 mpg highway/26 mpg combined.

Cole Attisha

2026 Honda CR-V TrailSport Hybrid

Cole Attisha

Cole Attisha

The Honda CR-V TrailSport's triumphs don't end with its mechanical performance, either. The CR-V boasts significantly greater cargo space when compared with the Forester, both with the rear seats folded up or down. The CR-V offers approximately 39.3 cubic feet behind the rear seats and 76.5 cubic feet with them folded, while the 2026 Forester Wilderness has about 27.5 cubic feet behind the rear seats and 69.1 cubic feet with them folded. That'll make a noticeable difference when you're trying to cram every last bit of gear and luggage into the trunk before a lengthy family road trip.

Subaru

Both the Forester Wilderness and the CR-V TrailSport offer similar yet unique cabin environments, despite their differing space offerings. Both vehicles utilize central display screens for infotainment purposes, offer digital gauge clusters, and feature cabins that are satisfactorily comfortable. From my perspective, the Subaru's interior felt more playful and was easier on the eyes. Gold accents and stitching strewn about livened the place up a bit. Its Startex upholstery looks and feels far more premium than the Honda's fabric, and, based on my own experience, I'd be surprised if it weren't more durable long-term than the Honda's material, especially if it'll be subject to sharp, muddy puppy paws. The Forester's large panoramic moonroof is a plus, as well, as it would be vastly preferable to the Honda's sunroof if I ever found myself stargazing out in the boonies late at night.

Although the Forester's interior appears more welcoming, I found the CR-V's interior to be more comfortable and ergonomic. The Forester Wilderness's interior is cozy, with no complaints regarding seating position, firmness, or any other factor that could contribute to an uncomfortable experience. The CR-V TrailSport Hybrid's interior is plainly more comfortable. Of course, the CR-V is inherently smoother to drive thanks to its torquey hybrid system, but its cushiony seating meant neither my behind nor my spine ever got sore even after lengthy driving stints. More importantly, at least in my opinion, is the fact that Honda hasn't simply relegated all of its interior functions onto one giant tablet screen in the middle of the dashboard. The Forester's infotainment screen can take some time to load, so you'll have to wait a few minutes after ignition to set your heated seats and cabin temperature to your preferred level. Although the Honda's smaller screen might deter younger buyers compared to the Subaru's television-sized tablet, I was much more pleased by the Honda's ergonomics than those of the Forester, and I'm not even thirty years old yet!

2026 Subaru Forester Wilderness

Cole Attisha

When it comes down to pricing, both the 2026 Honda CR-V TrailSport Hybrid and the 2026 Subaru Forester Wilderness land in the mid- to high-30 grand range. Specifically, the Forester Wilderness asks $36,285, with an available $2,000 optional package that adds an 8.0-inch Multimedia System with native navigation, an upgraded, Harman Kardon-developed premium sound system, and a power rear liftgate. On the other hand, the CR-V TrailSport Hybrid asks $38,800 up front, but includes upgraded features such as a Bose premium sound system and a power rear liftgate in that cost. Optional extra packages include the $1,424 "HPD Package," which adds cosmetic enhancements such as a tailgate spoiler, HPD emblem, lower door trim accent, and fender flares, as well as the $345 "Protection Package," which essentially bundles a few popular accessories such as splash guards, a cargo tray, and black wheel locks.

So, then, since both crossovers are priced at a relatively similar price point for the equivalent features, give or take a few hundred bucks, a winner can't necessarily be settled based on cost alone. The reality is that there isn't really one clear winner between the two of these crossovers. Both the Honda CR-V TrailSport Hybrid and the Subaru Forester Wilderness demonstrate an excellent understanding of each automaker's respective clientele, and both offer equipment and packaging that would be mind-blowing to find at this price point only a few short years ago. The truth of the matter is that it really does just come down to whether you plan on spending more time on or off the road, and, I guess, whether you prefer the look of one over the other. There's no denying the Forester Wilderness does the whole adventure-ready cosplay thing to a much more effective degree than that of the CR-V TrailSport, but at the same time, if you're a bit more grounded and are willing to admit to yourself that, perhaps you don't need things like a revised final drive or updated differentials in your comfortable compact crossover daily driver. Possibly, the CR-V TrailSport will resonate with you more through its understated subtleties.

Cole Attisha

Back to my original question, then: which one would I have? Well, honestly, the answer I'd give you is simply that I wouldn't have either. I'm not a fan of multitools, but rather tools that are dedicated to a single task. If I want to scale a mountain or hit the trails, I'll take my body-on-frame, V8-powered 1995 Land Rover and not worry about a few bumps and bruises. Surely, if I ever came across any obstacles drastic enough to do some serious harm, my old Disco could handle far more than any unibody crossover pretending to be an off-roader could overcome. That said, these crossovers aren't meant for buttheaded people like me who will gladly pour money into a 30-year-old heap just because it's boxy and looks tough. These crossovers are do-it-all daily drivers. Either of these two crossovers could feasibly be your family's only vehicle, unlike my Land Rover, which achieves 10 mpg on a good day, only to make the same amount of power as the relatively fuel-sipping Forester Wilderness, and constantly requires repairs.

Ultimately, I believe the Honda CR-V TrailSport Hybrid is a better comparison to the Subaru Forester Hybrid than to the Forester Wilderness. If you're serious about taking it off-road, the Forester Wilderness is the way to go over the CR-V TrailSport; it's no contest. If most of your driving will be done on the road, then the CR-V TrailSport Hybrid might be the superior option. However, it'd still be worth comparing it with the Forester Hybrid, which would still offer superior ground clearance, albeit with more competitive power and fuel economy when compared to the Forester Wilderness. Plus, no one is stopping you from throwing a set of all-terrain tires on one of those, either, if you insist on adding some extra ruggedness.

When buying a car, being mindful of its resale value is essential. While you probably won’t list a vehicle in the “for sale by owner” classified section on a website, you’ll almost definitely trade your vehicle in or sell it to a reseller like CarMax. Knowing which cars hold their value, however, can be tricky.

We tend to think of value retention for auto brands rather than for specific vehicles. As newly compiled data shows, the brands you think hold their value best actually do, so no major surprises on that front. The vehicles that hold their value best, however, might surprise you.

Cole Attisha

Japanese brands tend to have the best value retention, according to US News, which compiled a list of the 14 vehicles that lose value the slowest. The data is specific to 2022 model-year vehicles, comparing the value when purchased new with the trade-in or resale value today. Toyota, unsurprisingly, dominates the list. Of the 14 vehicles that hold their value best, the Japanese automaker makes nine. We’ll also give Toyota a half-point for the Subaru Crosstrek, as the automaker has a 20 percent stake in Subaru. Of the remaining four vehicles, Ford, Nissan, Honda, and Kia each have one.

Surprisingly, the Toyota Corolla Cross has the best retained value, losing only 2.63 percent over three years. The Toyota 4Runner (4.85 percent), Toyota C-HR (4.89 percent), Subaru Crosstrek (4.90 percent), and Toyota Tacoma (5.34 percent) round out the top five. The Ford Mustang ranks sixth, with 5.41 percent of its value lost over three years. It’s important to note this is specific to the Mustang, not the Mustang Mach-E. The Nissan Versa is in seventh place, the Honda Civic is in ninth place, and the Kia Rio is in 11th place.

In some areas of the United States, used vehicles are more popular. In Idaho, South Dakota, Wyoming, Iowa, Montana, and Oregon, used-vehicle shoppers are looking for vehicles that are, on average, over six years old. Spokane, Washington-area used-car shoppers are eyeing vehicles that are nearly seven years old.

Car dealerships that accept trade-ins often sell those vehicles at auction or ship them to other dealerships in the company, where they might sell better. You can negotiate trade-in value to some degree, but not as much as you’d probably like. If one of the 14 vehicles on US News’ list is on your radar, give it heavy consideration; when it comes time to trade it in, you’ll be glad you did.

The elephant in the room is that there are no electric vehicles on this list. That’s because EVs lose value at 13 percent, on average. As much as we fawn over them, and as fun as they are to drive, few people want to buy a used EV. With battery degradation and the poor trim materials used in many EVs, it’s easy to see why, but that trend may be changing.

Subaru fans, rejoice: the STI nameplate is making noise again. After years without a true successor to the WRX STI, the automaker will debut two new performance concepts later this month at the Japan Mobility Show — one powered by gas, the other by electrons.

The pair, dubbed the Performance-B STI and Performance-E STI, represent Subaru Tecnica International’s twin paths forward. One sticks to the old-school formula of a turbocharged engine and all-wheel drive, while the other teases the company’s first-ever electric performance car.

The Performance-E STI concept is Subaru’s first crack at an electric sports car under the STI banner. Early teasers reveal a low, fastback-like silhouette with sharp angles, slim headlights, and gold-accented aero wheels — a nod to the brand’s rally heritage. Subaru says the car will showcase a spacious interior and heritage-inspired design, suggesting this could mark a return to the hatchback layout that longtime fans have missed since the days of the WRX STI five-door.

Subaru

Official specs remain a mystery, but the company says the concept previews the future of the performance brand. Given Subaru’s commitment to symmetrical all-wheel drive, expect any production version to emphasize traction and handling as much as raw power.

Just as surprising is Subaru’s decision to show a new gas-powered STI at all. The Performance-B STI concept features a horizontally opposed engine — the boxer layout Subaru is famous for — along with symmetrical all-wheel drive. The design echoes the current WRX but with sportier proportions: red-trimmed grilles, vented fenders, and a massive roof spoiler.

Subaru

That alone should make enthusiasts take notice. Subaru had previously suggested the STI badge would go all-electric, largely due to tightening emissions rules. Yet the automaker clearly sees room for another combustion-powered performance car, at least in concept form.

It’s been four years since Subaru last sold a WRX STI in the U.S., and fans have been waiting impatiently for something that captures the same raw, rally-bred spirit. The company’s most recent full-fat STI, the Japan-only S210, used a 2.4-liter turbocharged engine with nearly 300 horsepower but never made it stateside.

Subaru

Whether these new concepts point to future production models isn’t clear, but Subaru’s timing is deliberate. The STI duo will debut alongside the Trailseeker EV SUV, Forester, Outback Wilderness, and even Travis Pastrana’s 1983 Family Huckster GL wagon. It’s a lineup that celebrates both the brand’s rugged outdoors image and its performance legacy.

For a company that built its identity around symmetrical all-wheel drive and rally-stage grit, the return of the STI badge — in any form — is big news. One concept looks back, the other forward. Together, they suggest that Subaru’s performance future might not just be about survival in an electric age, but about finding new ways to make driving fun again.

Subaru revealed a completely new Outback for the 2026 model year back in August, and it’s less wagon and more rugged SUV than before. Unfortunately, the new one also has a much higher price, effectively shutting out Subaru fans who appreciate a no-frills, practical, and high-value package.

The good news is that you can still lease or buy the 2025 Subaru Outback this month, but not for long, as the new model becomes available later this year. Before that happens, here’s a look at how much you can save by opting for the older but still capable model.

Related: 2025 Subaru Outback Touring XT review: Turbo-powered wagon impresses, but not where you might expect

2025 Subaru Outback

Kristen Brown

Available now through October 31, 2025, the Subaru Outback’s lease price is $275 per month over 36 months, with $4,274 due at signing. This Outback lease deal applies specifically to the base trim and excludes tax, title, and licensing. 

The lease for the Subaru Outback includes 10,000 miles per year, but if you exceed that, you’ll be liable for a cost of $0.15 per mile. Back in June, the base Outback could be leased for $299/month over 36 months, but with $3,049 due at signing. Then and now, it’s good value for what is a tough, reliable vehicle. 

If you want to buy, Subaru is offering 0% APR financing for 36 months, which applies to all nine trims, including the off-road-oriented Outback Wilderness with its raised ride height. Here’s a look at pricing for the 2025 Subaru Outback:

Trim

Price

Base

$29,995

Premium

$33,060

Onyx Edition

$37,970

Limited

$39,720

Touring

$42,280

Onyx Edition XT

$41,225

Wilderness

$41,710

Limited XT

$42,060

Touring XT

$44,730

Some Subaru Outback lease or finance offers will differ based on your location, so be sure to visit the Subaru website and add your zip code to see deals close to you.

Subaru

The first five Outback trims (Base, Premium, Onyx Edition, Limited, and Touring) use a 2.5-liter Boxer four-cylinder engine producing 182 horsepower and 176 lb-ft of torque. All other trims have a 2.4L turbo-four with meatier outputs of 260 hp and 277 lb-ft, which makes a substantial difference to the driving experience.

Unsurprisingly, Subaru’s symmetrical all-wheel-drive system is standard, as is the company’s Lineartronic CVT. By going from the base engine to the turbo, the towing capacity increases from 2,700 to 3,500 pounds.

Although the base model is cheap to lease, you have to make do with manually-adjustable, cloth-covered seats, single-zone climate control, and the more basic infotainment centre with its unusual dual seven-inch screens. This one doesn’t even have a retractable cover for the cargo area, and it looks rather basic with its black mirrors and smaller wheels—not that flashy design is a Subaru selling point. Every other model has the more modern 11.6-inch touchscreen, a leather-wrapped steering wheel, and dual-zone climate control.

Regardless of the trim, cargo space behind the second row is 32.6 cubic feet, and you get 75.6 cubic feet with the back seats folded.

Related: 2025 Subaru Outback Wilderness vs. 2026 Honda Passport Trailsport: Which One Is Right For You?

Subaru

It may be going out of production soon, but the 2025 Subaru Outback’s lease and finance deals make sense at the bottom of the range. It has a price tag that handsomely undercuts the new one, and this is a vehicle that’s appealingly unpretentious without unnecessary options. 

If you’ll be buying for $36,000 or more, though, it may be a smarter move to wait for the new model, which will have more modern design and technology.

*Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. The information presented herein is based on manufacturer-provided lease offer information, which is subject to frequent change and may vary based on location, creditworthiness, and other factors. We are not a party to any lease agreements and assume no liability for the terms, conditions, availability, or accuracy of any lease offers mentioned. All terms, including but not limited to pricing, mileage allowances, and residual values, require direct verification with an authorized local OEM dealership. This article does not constitute financial advice or an endorsement of any particular lease or vehicle.

Mazda, Toyota, and Subaru may work closely to co-develop technology, engines, transmissions, all-wheel drive tech, and hybrid powertrains, but that doesn’t mean they don’t compete with each other for customers. The 2025 Mazda CX-5 and the Subaru Forester, for instance, are similar across multiple disciplines. They’re both around the same size, price, and come standard with all-wheel drive. That said, there are fundamental differences that make them more appealing to different buyers. 

Kristen Brown

Price and option-wise, the Mazda CX-5 comes in eight flavors, and can be incredibly basic at the 2.5 S trim, but insanely posh and premium at the 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus or Carbon Edition, ranging from $29,050 to $41,080. The Subaru’s lineup is a bit simpler, ranging from the $29,995 base model to the $41,595 Touring edition. If you’re stuck between one of the other, here’s the best way to look at the two similar (but very different) SUVs. 

Both SUVs come with a naturally aspirated 2.5-liter engine in the base trim, but unlike the Mazda, the Subaru Forester no longer comes with a turbocharger option. The Forester XT was axed after the 2018 model year, and it’s greatly missed. If you’re still looking to scratch the itch the XT left behind, you can get the CX-5 with Mazda’s SkyActiv turbocharged engine in the Carbon Turbo, Turbo Premium, and Turbo Signature trim levels. Otherwise, the Subaru makes 180 horsepower, and the Mazda makes 187 horsepower without a turbo.

Kristen Brown

If you’re nerdy about transmission options, the Forester XT came with a “high torque” CVT paired to the turbocharger, which kept the mileage higher than a standard automatic would. It featured a 6 to 8 speed manual mode to make you feel alive again, but it didn’t hit as hard as Mazda’s standard eight-speed automatic transmission does. Plus, Mazda’s turbocharged engine is boostable. If you add premium 93 octane fuel instead of regular, you go from 227 horsepower to 256. I can say from experience that the turbocharger plus all-wheel drive makes for a lot of fun, even when hauling kids and groceries.

It may seem shocking, but Mazda doesn’t offer the CX-5 as a hybrid. Right now, the only hybrids Mazda sells are the CX-70 PHEV, CX-90 PHEV, and the CX-50 mild-hybrid (which uses Toyota’s hybrid system). The CX-30 will have a hybrid version soon, but amazingly enough, the CX-5 isn’t one of them. Subaru is also skimping on hybrids, as the Forester has only recently been hybridized. A Crosstrek hybrid will be coming soon, too.

Kristen Brown

The Forester hybrid is unsurprisingly excellent–and I adored the fact that it came with a mechanical, full-time all-wheel drive system like the gas-powered Forester instead of the on-demand system that comes with Toyota’s hybrids. The on-demand system is capable and reliable, too, and it's also much more efficient, earning over 30 mpg combined versus the full-time system's combined 26 mpg.

The Touring trim level of the Forester comes with a lot of the same features as the Mazda’s Turbo Premium or Turbo Signature: brown leather, leather-wrapped steering wheel, exciting textures, contrasting colors, premium sound systems, and a long list of digital displays. One thing that annoyed me about the CX-5, however, was the same gripe I have about all Mazdas I’ve tested: the infotainment screen is a good size and it’s in a good spot, but it’s only a touch screen if you’re using a phone mirroring software like Android Auto or Apple CarPlay. Otherwise, you’re stuck with the company’s annoying dial and button setup, which is antiquated and annoying to have to leaf through if you want to change a simple setup. It wouldn’t be so bad if the voice assistant worked, but it barely did.

Kristen Brown

Subaru’s interior is also decked out in brown leather, but the Turbo Premium I drove had black carpeting and accenting. In other trims, the CX-5 can come with gorgeous red or “greige” leather. Both elevate the interior of the “cheap” Mazda very nicely, and when paired with the optional Bose sound system, they truly make the interior feel like it comes from a $50,000 to $60,000 car. The Subaru’s cabin is a lot more tech-forward, but it only comes in cloth, black leather, or brown leather. 

Subaru

More than anything, it felt like Subaru focused on a more utilitarian design with water-repellent seating, large windows for increased visibility, as well as premium colors and materials at the top of the line, while Mazda’s focus was on making it as posh as possible for the price point. I also found the Mazda to be much quieter than the Forester, too. If interior quality and design matter most, the Mazda is the winner in this category.

What made Subaru so popular in the first place was the company’s full-time, fully mechanical AWD configuration. The rear differential has a viscous coupling, which acts similarly to a limited-slip differential when the car is slipping and makes the AWD system a competent plug-and-play system. Next time you’re in a place that sees regular snowfall in the autumn and winter, pay attention to how many Subarus are in the area. There’s a good reason for it.

Kristen Brown

Mazda’s AWD system is also an advanced full-time mechanical system, but the key difference is that the car doesn’t evenly split the engine’s power between the front and rear axles all the time like Subaru’s system does. Instead, when no slipping is detected or it’s in a “Normal” drive mode, a majority of the engine’s power goes to the front wheels. That way, the engine isn’t working as hard to get it moving, and the mileage is better. When reviewing either, the Subaru earned about 22 mpg combined, and the Mazda went between 25 to 26 mpg combined.

The CX-5 may come with a “Trail” mode, but its 7.6 inches of ground clearance isn’t as high as the Subaru’s 8.7 inches. All Forester trim levels, even the base, come with the company’s dual-function X-MODE system, which adjusts the throttle response, “shifting” of the transmission, AWD functions, and toggles cameras to display live feeds on the central 12.3-inch infotainment screen. The Mazda CX-5 doesn’t do that–but it’s still more than ready to take on your town’s snowy, rainy, and muddy roads, and look good while doing it.

Kristen Brown

The Forester can also come in a Wilderness trim for $34,995, which has an impressive list of factory improvements to make it more trail-worthy, like factory skid plates, a factory lift (going up to 9.2 inches of ground clearance instead of 8.7), a beefier CVT, water repellant seats, a terrain selection system to work in tandem with the X-MODE system, and all-terrain tires. The Mazda CX-5’s focus on a premium and dynamic drive means there isn’t an off-road-focused trim, but if you’re not planning on doing much camping or adventuring, you won’t miss it.

The CX-5, according to Mazda’s brochure, offers 30.8 cubic feet of cargo space, while Subaru’s trunk measures 29.6 cubic feet of space. However, when the second row seats are folded, the Forester offers 74.4 cubic feet of space, while the Mazda only has 59.3 cubic feet. When it comes to passenger space, the figures are very, very similar. Rear passengers can enjoy 39.6 cubic inches of legroom in the Forester, while the Mazda has 39.4 cubic inches.

Kristen Brown

It’s the design that gives the Mazda a lower figure for head and shoulder room in the rear compared to the Forester. The Subaru is taller, so there’s more vertical space for passengers in the rear, while the Mazda’s sportier hatchback-inspired design cuts into passenger space by a small amount. The Subaru was much more open and toddler-friendly, too, but the Mazda would work just fine for families looking for luxury on a budget.

As I mentioned before, the price range on the CX-5 compared to the Forester is very, very similar. Both start at just under $30,000, and at the top of the line, are just over $40,000. That makes both the Subaru and the Mazda very cost-efficient, and therefore, more available to a wider range of possible buyers. The Forester lets buyers pick from a rugged off-roader, a luxurious touring model, and an affordable hybrid SUV, while the Mazda offers a great entry into the borderline luxury SUV market or an affordable, sport luxury model. 

Kristen Brown

Either way, you’re not losing. Both have great options to choose from for the price and are proven to be very reliable with moderate powertrain and transmission warranties.

Overall, I enjoyed my time with both SUVs. Both have a lot of personality, a variety of options, and a friendly price range. Which is best depends on what you’re looking for out of a car. They're great everyday SUVs, with excellent mileage for AWD cars, easygoing driving dynamics, great cargo space figures, and open interior designs. The Mazda’s driving style is much nicer, especially with the turbocharged engine, although I did love the Subaru’s range of a hybrid, tourer, and Wilderness model.

Subaru

If you want something that speaks a more luxurious language and isn’t overwhelmingly techy, the Mazda is a great option. If you want something that will better handle the trails to your favorite remote campsites, the occasional dirt trail, and tougher, icier, and snowy conditions, the Subaru has a proven record of being off-road capable. 

The Subaru Outback and Volkswagen Tiguan remain go-to choices in the SUV market, but the former has introduced some significant updates for its 2026 model year that differentiate it from the latter in more ways than one. Subaru’s squared-off redesign of the Outback demands a double-take, and its engineering remains capable in off-road scenarios. In contrast, Volkswagen targets families and urban drivers with its 2025 Tiguan’s premium, tech-forward form and function. The 2026 Outback starts at $34,995, while the 2025 Tiguan has a base price of $30,245. Let’s take a closer look at how these two models compare, highlighting five key differences that illustrate their unique positions in the crowded SUV segment.

Volkswagen

One of the most significant differences between these SUVs is size, with the 2026 Outback falling into the mid-size category, and the 2025 Tiguan existing as a compact option. While the 2025 Subaru Outback was also classified as a mid-size SUV, the new Outback has gotten larger in length, width, and height, accentuating its size difference in comparison to the Tiguan. A 2026 Outback is 192.3 inches long, 75.8 inches wide, and 68.1 inches tall. Cargo volume behind the rear seats has also increased by two cu ft to 34.6 cu ft. In contrast, the 2025 Tiguan is 184.4 inches long, 73 inches wide, and 66.1 to 66.5 inches in height, with 26.5 cu ft of cargo space behind the rear seats.

There’s growing speculation that Subaru will offer the Outback’s first-ever hybrid powertrain for the 2026 production year. However, the automaker hasn’t directly confirmed this release, and even if they do, it will come after the gas-powered 2026 Outback trims’ initial launch in late 2025. For now, we know that the 2026 Outback offers a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine and an available 2.4-liter turbocharged four-cylinder. The standard 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine accommodates everyday performance with 180 horsepower and 178 lb-ft of torque, whereas the 2.4-liter turbocharged four-cylinder — standard on the XT and Wilderness trims — supplies 260 horsepower and 277 lb-ft of torque. All 2026 Outbacks come with standard all-wheel drive, while the 2025 Tiguan offers a choice of front-wheel drive (FWD) and AWD. The Tiguan’s single 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine option produces 201 horsepower and 207-221 lb-ft of torque, depending on your drivetrain selection.

Subaru

The 2026 Subaru Outback doesn’t cut corners with its tech presentation, but the 2025 Tiguan places greater emphasis on this area. Drivers behind the wheel of a 2026 Outback receive a 12.1-inch infotainment touchscreen and a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster. In comparison, the 2025 Tiguan provides a standard 12.9-inch touchscreen, a 15-inch touchscreen in the SEL R-Line trim, a 10.25-inch digital instrument cluster, and an available head-up display. The 2025 Tiguan also enhances interior comfort with tech features like optional 10-point, full-back massage functions for the front seats, which, along with the head-up display, are not available in the 2026 Outback.

Subaru

While the Outback has adopted a more traditional SUV exterior design for its 2026 model year, it retains the off-road readiness found in previous iterations. In addition to standard AWD, the new Outback features 8.7 inches of ground clearance on all trims except the Wilderness, which boasts 9.5 inches. The 2025 Tiguan has 7 inches of ground clearance in AWD and 6.6 inches in FWD. Subaru also equips the 2026 Outback Wilderness with a front skid plate, upgraded heavy-duty roof rails, all-terrain tires, extended lower cladding, Dual-function X-MODE with Hill Descent Control, and electronically controlled dampers for improved traction and ride comfort.

Subaru

The 2025 Tiguan offers Travel Assist, a semi-autonomous system combining adaptive cruise control and lane-keep assist to maintain a safe distance from the car you’re following and keep you centered within your lane. While the 2026 Outback’s Highway Hands Free Assist feature is available instead of standard, it ups the ante from the 2025 Tiguan’s Travel Assist, which requires hands-on engagement. Despite still requiring driver attention, the new Outback’s Highway Hands Free Assist enables hands-free operation at speeds up to 85 mph on designated highways, with features such as automatic emergency stop assistance with safe lane selection, pre-curve speed control, highway active lane-changing assistance, and automatic resume assist.

Subaru

The 2026 Outback’s redesign is a daring step forward with its balance of traditional SUV design cues and off-road capability, complemented by an expanded collection of driver-assist features like Highway Hands Free Assist. In comparison, the 2025 Tiguan focuses on a premium, tech-forward interior presentation with a larger available touchscreen, an optional head-up display, and available massage front seats, which you won’t find in the 2026 Outback. Regardless of your preference, be sure to test drive each vehicle before making a decision.

Subaru’s announcement makes a significant impression by hinting at two STI concepts that are sure to excite both performance enthusiasts and electric vehicle fans in anticipation of the 2025 Japan Mobility Show, which commences on October 29. Subaru merges its rally legacy with cutting-edge technology, leading to the creation of the battery electric vehicle (BEV) concept known as the Performance-E STI.

Furthermore, the Japanese car manufacturer is also maintaining momentum in its internal combustion engine lineup, as the Performance-B STI concept may potentially represent the next-generation WRX STI hot hatch. Here is what we know so far, along with additional details about what Subaru will be showcasing.

Subaru

Subaru is revving up in the performance electric vehicle class as the fully electric Performance-E STI will make its world debut. Based on the official teaser, the electric STI concept merges aerodynamic efficiency for standout performance without compromising on practicality. Subaru has not confirmed whether it will be a coupe or a hatchback, but it sports sleek and swept-back LED headlights with a sharp and sloping hood and muscular wheel arches.

The Subaru EV will get a driver layout console packed with next-generation technologies. The company is also focusing on comfort; hence, the cabin is expected to be roomy and spacious for passengers. Subaru has not shared details and specifications yet, but the Performance-E draws from the company's experience with the Solterra electric SUV. It will come with a dual-motor all-wheel-drive system.

For those who crave turbocharged thrills, Subaru is gearing up to launch an internal combustion beast. The Performance-B concept is a five-door hatchback powered by a traditional boxer engine with AWD. The new concept is expected to be the much-awaited successor to the WRX STI hatchback, which could rival the Toyota GR Corolla hatch. The design is clearly inspired by the WRC, starting from the headlights, vented hood, wide fender extensions, a distinct grille, and a big wing for showing off its rally cred. 

Subaru will showcase electric vehicles and rugged off-road capability. The Trailseeker EV—also called the E-Outback—will be the company’s second EV. The all-electric crossover will be equipped with AWD for outdoor enthusiasts and is expected to come standard with features like factory-fitted roof boxes, bike racks, and gear mounts.

The Forester Wilderness Prototype is a more rugged and adventure-ready version of the SUV, Subaru Forester, designed for families who love the outdoors. It features standard AWD for all-weather conditions, off-road upgrades for tackling rough terrain, and a durable, family-friendly design. Canoe racks on the roof make it easy to bring along outdoor gear, making this SUV perfect for weekend getaways, road trips, and camping adventures. 

Then there is the Subaru Outback Wilderness Prototype, which is designed specifically for tough trails and rugged off-road conditions. It gets rugged enhancements for off-road enthusiasts and everyday explorers, like increased ground clearance, off-road tires that deliver superior traction on mud, rocks, and gravel, and bike racks perfect for seamless trail riding. Pushing it to new heights, the Outback Wilderness also comes with durable roof accessories like cargo carriers and crossbars. 

The Family Huckster is a wild, race-ready version of the iconic 1983 Subaru GL Wagon, inspired by Travis Pastrana’s viral Gymkhana stunts. With retro performance, extreme aerodynamics, and high-horsepower upgrades, this concept car captures the playful side of Subaru’s performance-driven adventurous spirit beyond its usual STI lineup.

The saying that no one buys a sports car for fuel economy isn't exactly true. There are some owners who couldn't give a lick about how much gas their steed guzzles, but it's always good to save a little money at the pump, even if your driving habits err on the spirited side most days. After all, that's what a sports car is for. If you want a car that’s fun without punishing you at the pump, it's good to know that there are several 2025 sports cars with genuinely strong EPA numbers. Here are five of the most efficient ones for sale today.

Honda

The 2026 Honda Civic Si ($30,995) isn't the most powerful Civic, but it provides serious fun with superb efficiency. The fact that it gets 31 combined EPA fuel economy is proof that you don’t need a hybrid or a huge budget to get efficiency and smiles per mile. Its 1.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder and mandatory 6-speed manual combine for superb levels of fun and the kind of efficiency typically reserved for less thrilling fare. We love the fact that you can't even get an automatic transmission in the Si. That means Honda wants you to connect with the car and the road.

Honda

The Si boasts a light curb weight of just over 2,900 pounds, sharp steering, and taut handling. It also comes with firmer suspension, a limited-slip differential, and a short-throw shifter for endless thrills. On the downside, the Si asks for premium fuel to extract the best performance (though you can use regular without harming the engine), and the manual-only setup means your efficiency depends on your right foot.

Mazda

There's no other way to put it: the Miata is the legend in this set. The 2025 Mazda MX-5 Miata ($29,830) is the best-selling roadster in history and an icon of sporty budget thrills. With so little mass to move, the 2.0-liter four posts 29–30 mpg combined, depending on soft-top vs. RF and paired transmission. Whatever configuration you choose, the result is driving thrills galore.

Mazda

The 2,600+ pound featherweight Miata helps keep fuel consumption down, and its punchy 181-horsepower naturally-aspirated four-cylinder engine is responsive and eager without drinking gas like a muscle car. Okay, so you have to give up passenger space, trunk space, and a tech-forward cabin, but you'll have a smile on your face mile after mile. To maximize fuel efficiency, keep the top up and stay with all-season rubber.

Not many efficient and affordable sporty cars get four doors and the ability to operate as a family sedan, but the 2025 Jetta GLI ($33,745) wins in all of these areas. Whether you choose a manual transmission or the dual-clutch automatic, you'll get 29 mpg for the manual and 30 for the automatic. You'll have to back off the throttle in order to hit those numbers, but it's nice to know the GLI will reward self-control with solid efficiency.

The GLI's tall top gears, slippery drag coefficient of just 0.26, and the turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder help at highway speeds. When you're not autocrossing it (yes, it can do that), it serves as a wonderful family sedan with 37.4 inches of rear legroom and 14.1 cubic feet of trunk space.

Volkswagen

Quicker and more youthful than the gentlemanly Jetta GLI, VW’s hot-hatch icon is still efficient compared with many rivals. The 2025 Volkswagen Golf GTI ($32,445) delivers 27 mpg combined, but reviews have determined that it can easily beat this number in real-world conditions. The turbocharged four-cylinder provides a healthy 241 horsepower and launches to 60 mph in a scant 5.6 seconds. Sadly, the 6-speed manual is gone, with the 7-speed dual clutch automatic providing shifting duties. It is, however, remarkably efficient given its performance focus.

The GTI isn't spartan inside, either. The sporty and handsome cabin gets truly supportive sport seats, a big 12.9-inch infotainment touchscreen, and real physical buttons (no more haptic controls) on the steering wheel. Standard safety features include automated emergency braking with pedestrian detection, lane-departure warning, lane-keeping assist, and adaptive cruise control. The triple threat of driving fun, serious safety, and solid fuel efficiency makes this sporty hatchback a win across the board.

The 2025 Ford Mustang EcoBoost Fastback ($32,320) isn't a car you'd think was efficient at all, but its turbocharged four-cylinder EcoBoost remains a top fuel-sipper in the lineup at 26 mpg combined. You will, however, have to sacrifice the Performance Package and summer rubber to get there. It's not that much to give up, though, because the EcoBoost 'stang will hit 60 mph under 5 seconds. The downside is that you can only get a 10-speed automatic on the 2025 EcoBoost Mustang.

Standard feature highlights include LED projector headlamps, LED sequential taillights, configurable DRLs, automatic high beam control, a 13.2-inch capacitive color touchscreen with SYNC 4, a 12.4-inch digital instrument cluster, dual zone automatic climate control, a flat-bottom steering wheel, launch control, rear parking sensor, and a lane keeping system.

Subaru

The 2025 Subaru BRZ's ($33,210) automatic variant delivers 25 mpg in combined driving, while the manual’s combined 22 mpg is lower but still competitive among sporty, non-hybrid cars. The fact that you can drive it at highway speeds and still get more than respectable mpgs is the icing on this sports car cake. You'll have to give up some engagement by getting the automatic, but it all depends on your priorities.

The BRZ is lightweight for a coupe, with a naturally aspirated 2.4-liter flat-4 that’s efficient under moderate loads. Its gearing and aerodynamic tweaks help too, but it is, after all, a sports car at heart, and the BRZ's standard limited-slip differential aids when you want to maximize traction under hard driving. The fact that you can enjoy rear-wheel drive dynamics while saving on gas money means you get the best of both worlds.

These efficient sports cars are a win-win for owners who want to thrash them when the opportunity presents itself, while achieving good fuel economy with more subdued driving. The surprises here are the muscled Mustang Ecoboost and the miserly Civic Si, but each one represents excellent performance with efficiency that will surprise, not a combination you see every day. It's nice to know you don't have to make sacrifices to get both.