Stare decisis is the doctrine of precedent – that a court should rule the way a previous court did – even when the judges of the second court disagree with the earlier. Is there a way to apply this doctrine without putting the precedent at a higher standing than the Constitution itself?

Path to Liberty: September 21, 2020

Subscribe: iTunes | Spotify | Podbean | Google | Stitcher | TuneIn | RSS

SHOW LINKS:

JOIN TAC

Show Archives

Subscribe and Review on iTunes

State of the Nullification Movement Report

Barnett: Stare Decisis for Originalist Judges

Supreme Court as a Legislature: A Dissent

Federalist 78

Federalist 81

Wurman: Stare Decisis in an Originalist Theory of Law

Berger: Government by Judiciary

Bigger Problem Underlies Supreme Court Fight

The Supreme Court Issues Opinions, not Law

ALTERNATE VIDEO SOURCES

Watch on LBRY

Watch on Brighteon

Watch on BitTube

Watch o...