The Adams Archive

In this week's episode of Red Pill Revolution, we discuss all sides of the Ukraine VS Russia War. We read both Putin and Zelenskys most recent speeches surrounding the war. We also discuss the recent findings that 80 Fort Bragg soldiers died from "unexplained causes" after taking a certain forced gene therapy. Lastly, we discuss recent rising tensions between China and the US surrounding Taiwan. 

Welcome to the revolution.

Hello and welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams. Thank you so much for listening today. This is episode number 30, two of the red pill revolution podcast. And again, thank you so much for joining me. We have a very interesting show for you guys today. Today's show is going to be all about an update from the Russia Ukraine war.

I feel like it's been a while since we've heard anything about it. It's been a little bit since we've touched on what's actually going on there. So we're going to go over, uh, some, some really, uh, deep dives into the conversations and it's all going to be directly from the mouths of the presidents or whatever you want to call them from each country.

So we're going to talk about Putin going over, why he believes there is currently food shortages who's fault. Meanwhile, while the U S is placing blame on the Putin price hike, a Russian president, Vladimir Putin thinks there's a different story to that. Also we're going to discuss, does Vladimir Putin have cancer and did he potentially survive an assassination attempt?

Whoa. All right. Then we're going to talk about Zelenskyi, his recent speech about the war, and then the Putins most reasoned speech about the war. So all of this today is going to be directly from the mouths of the presidents, which are on each side of this war. So we'll get a completely non-biased approach and then we will discuss it on top of that.

We're also going to discuss 80 soldiers at Fort Bragg who have recently died of sudden and unexplained deaths. So many deaths, in fact that the, uh, they basically stopped. Over a year ago, June of 2021, Fort Bragg stopped recording these deaths of these soldiers. So all of that, and more today, it's going to be a great episode.

First thing I need you to do is go ahead and hit that subscribe button. You know, the drill. It takes two seconds out of your day to subscribe to the podcast. And it means the world to me, I work a lot on this podcast for you guys and work very hard and it gets you some good karma, right? There's not a lot that you can do with just a press of a button that should make you feel all fuzzy inside.

And you can do that right now. Um, by pressing the subscribe button, leave a five-star review, I would appreciate it so much. Um, thank you. Thank you. Now, the next thing I need you to do is head over to our sub stack sub stack, um, is red pill, revolution dot sub stack.com. Every single week, there is a podcast companion.

It is free of cost. Doesn't cost you anything as of now. And you get basically all of the articles, all of the videos, all of the topics that we discussed right there on that sub stacked directly in your email, as well as the video podcast, the audio podcasts every single week, right to your inbox. How do you beat that?

Free of cost. All right, cool. Awesome. Now let's go ahead and jump into it. We have a little bit change the format up today. We did a little intro clip. Now let's go ahead and do the full introduction and then we will discuss everything here today. So again, thank you so much for listening. Welcome to the revolution.

welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams. Red pill revolution started out with me realizing every thing that I knew, everything that I believed, everything I interpret about my life is through the lens of the information I was spoonfed as a child, religion, politics, history, conspiracies, Hollywood medicine, money, food, all of it, everything we know was tactfully written to influence your decisions and your view on reality by those in power.

Now I'm on a mission, a mission to retrain and reeducate myself to find the true reality of what is behind that curtain. And I'm taking your ass with me. Welcome to the rebel.

All right, again, episode number 20 or 32. Oh my gosh. Episode number 30, two of the red pill revolution podcast. So we're going to jump right into it today, guys. The first thing we're going to discuss is the Fort Bragg lost over 80 soldiers from sudden and unexplained causes to a point where they completely stopped reporting the deaths.

After June of 2021. It's been a full year now where they have not been reporting these deaths. So I'm going to read this article. It says one of the largest military installations in the world, Fort Bragg is home to approximately 54,000 military personnel and includes the special forces, the airborne corpse, the joint special force operations command, and just 18 months Fort brag lost over 80 soldiers.

From sudden and unexplained causes. According to officials, 33 of the fatalities are undetermined causes for Brad, cannot explain why dozens of soldiers are dying in their own bunks during the same 18 month period, three Fort Bragg soldiers died in overseas combat. Wow. So three soldiers died in the line of duty in the same time that more than 80 soldiers died unexplained in their beds.

Now I'm not even going to jump into why I think that may be let's let the article do the talking and then we'll discuss it after. But I think that's pretty unbelievable. Three soldiers died overseas in combat at Fort Bragg, which is a special forces base while 80 soldiers died from unexplained causes.

Wow. So it says, this means that soldiers stationed at Fort Bragg are 27 times more likely to die unexpectedly in their. Then they are in overseas, combat

Fort Bragg stops reporting the soldiers deaths after dozens of soldiers are found dead in their bunks and investigative reporter for rolling stones magazine. Seth harp has been looking into this medical anomaly on February 9th, 2022. Seth reported that the death of 83 soldiers at Fort Bragg in the 18 months ending in June, 2021, Fort Bragg stopped reporting the fatalities after June, 2021, but the bowtie counts continue to rise out of the 83 sudden unexplained fatalities.

11 of them were determined to be from natural causes. Imagine that the healthiest soldiers in the world, these special forces soldiers at a special forces base. Now they're not all special forces, obviously. Um, but it's a pretty damn healthy base. Uh, 27 times more likely to die unexplained unexpectedly in there.

Then from actual combat. Um, so it says that 11 of them were determined to be from natural causes. Heart wrote that Fort Bragg soldiers have been turning up unresponsive in their barracks on a disturbingly regular basis since the beginning of 2020, including Qaeda, Caleb Smith, Terrence Salazar, Jamie bogger, Joshua diamond, Matthew Disney, McKell Rubino, Michael Hamilton and numerous others who have not been named drugs were involved in the deaths of Joshua diamond and Matthew Disney.

The two were found dead on the same day in June, 2021, just two weeks after airborne master Sergeant Martin S ACV. The third was caught trafficking cocaine. Wow. Okay. That took a turn. Drugs are only a small part of the problem in January of 2021 army captain Robert Latham died suddenly after an apparent heart attack.

The 32 year old was previously in top physical condition of green Baret named Calvin Rockwood passed away from a sudden and unexplained medical event. The 38 rule was an excellent physical condition as well. According to Seth nine more young and fit soldiers were found unresponsive in their bunks, the us army and Fort Bragg refuse to report on the surgeon deaths disrespecting the soldiers and their families.

Could there be a serious drug problem going on at Fort Bragg? Could these deaths indicate a surge in suicides and overdoses? The military continues to be assaulted by mandates that harm soldiers, physically and mentally the vaccine mandates damage combat readiness while banishing the strongest healthiest freedom fighters from the.

Now I think that's interesting to note, um, the military had a complete and total, uh, any, basically anybody who refused to get vaccinated got thrown out. Now, I personally know of a soldier who literally lost eyesight after being forced to take the vaccine. Um, and then they wouldn't give him an honorable discharge to get out.

It's it's, it's unbelievable to me, the way that their military has been going about this. Now, what I think this has to do with more so even than the vaccine is getting agreeable soldiers, you can find very easily find where party lines lie. When you talk about vaccine mandates, it's a weird thing that medical science has to somehow be politicized to the point where, you know, if you're unvaccinated, you're probably laying on one side and if you're vaccinated, you're probably lying on the other.

Um, sometimes it intermingles, but in this case, a lot of times that holds true. So in the military, if you just do a massive basically, uh, you know, kicking out of everybody who does not decide to get vaccinated, you're basically kicking out anybody who disagrees with the political ideology of the president who held office or holds office.

And I saw a video the other day I was on Tik TOK or something, um, where there was literally a soldier who was talking and saying how he was, uh, he always, he thought he was going to be the only one who was getting kicked out for not taking the vaccine. And he showed up for his discharge and, uh, unbeknownst to him, there was a huge line of soldiers who were being discharged specifically because of their medical status.

Crazy, crazy. So this article goes on to say, The military has medical database explodes with a thousand percent increase in medical issues in 2021. Now you have to realize that our soldiers have to be within a certain age. When I was in, I believe the oldest that you could enlist was about 29. I was 18 when I enlisted, but I believe when I was enlisting, the oldest, you could be as 29.

Now you can get like a medical waiver up to 39, but you're young, right? You're pretty damn young if you're going into the military. So a thousand percent increase in medical issues in 2021 X like exactly proceeding the time when they did a forced vaccination. Now, it's also interesting to note that you'll get a bunch of other vaccines when you go into the military.

You know, I think this is an interesting conversation. When I went as, when I was in the military, I've literally, before I went in the military, I never in my life saw somebody. Pass out, just, just close their eyes and just completely passed out. Now, if you go to any single military parade, like a graduation parade in the military, you're going to see more people pass out in a single parade than you've ever seen in your entire life ever.

So, you know, when you go into the military, any vaccinations that you haven't had, you literally go through a line where they give you dozens, like dozens of vaccines. Um, you know, you get a penicillin shot, which you call the peanut butter shot because it leaves, you know, this big, huge bump in your body that you gotta like rub out on the floor.

Um, you get a bunch of, bunch of vaccines that they give you in, that they give you a penicillin shot, literally for no reason, no reason at all. They give you the shot. It makes no sense. Um, but they give it to you. They give you every vaccine that they can think of because to them, you're like livestock, you're a number.

And if you cost them money, because there's an outbreak of whatever, uh, you know, your livestock to them. So they just jab, jab, jab, jab, jab, Uh, regardless of what your belief systems are, regardless of any exemptions you think you may hold. Um, and so you literally just see people pass out. I literally caught a dude, like we were leaving our tech school.

Um, I was in the air traffic control tech tech school at, uh, Keesler air force base in Biloxi, Mississippi. And it was like the first day that we got out of bootcamp and, uh, you know, you're so like just disoriented in these situations. And it's the very first day I walked out of our dorms. We line up in, uh, in our, you know, whatever elements and, uh, I'm at the very front with a guy.

Um, and the ended up being the cool dude, but on the very, very first day of tech school, uh, this guy starts marching. And, uh, as he's marching, I literally see, he starts to March like sideways, like kind of like starts to sway side to side and like a zigzag position. And all of a sudden this dude's probably like six foot four, two hundred and forty five pounds.

And this man just like, just. Just seizes up. His body just stops and he just starts to fall and they actually caught him and like fell to the ground with them. Luckily, uh, so he didn't hit his head because I was the, uh, the guy next to him. Um, so we were the two tallest in the flight, but, uh, but luckily he, you know, they tried to say it was like dehydration or something, but literally you just laughed being from getting all of these, you know, different jabs from all these different things.

Um, so it doesn't surprise me that there's a thousand percent increase, especially when it's something like this, you know, specific type, which isn't actually like any of those other ones that we've gotten in the past. So anyways, side note, the military health system began administrating, administering the spike protein MRMA to military service members on December 14th, 2020, since then the military has administered more than 6.4 million doses, fully inoculating 90.1% of active duty service members with the two dose protocol.

Uh, Pretty crazy. Now this goes on to ask, now this is not a, this is a little bit of a bias article. So, you know, take this with a grain of salt and read about it on your own. Um, but this goes on to say that, uh, what role does the shot have on the number of unexpected and undetermined deaths? Why is Fort Bragg less safe than it was before the mask testing and vaccine mandates?

The army is failing to keep soldiers combat ready. And this is evidenced by the military, his own medical surveillance system, defense medical epidemiology database is used to detect surges of injury and illnesses in the military to make sure that all of the individuals are combat ready. The D med and the armed forces, health surveillance branches, web based tool to remotely query de identified active component personnel and medical event data contained within the defense medical surveillance system.

Wow. That was a mouthful in January, 2022 attorneys. Thomas runs and Leah. Retrieved the demat data from the military whistleblowers, Dr. Samuel single off Peter Chambers and Theresa Long. Um, the data was provided to Senator Ron Johnson at a historic round table meeting with doctors and lawyers. According to the data, the five-year average for medical issues in the military was 1.7 million coats.

After the jab protocol was mandated on the military, the number of medical issues spike to 20, my reading that right. Wow, 22 million, 22 million from 1.7 million, which is a 1000% increase over 1000% increase. Many of the issues are directly related to these jobs, including Bell's palsy, mire, myocardial infraction, pulmonary embolisms, and neurological disorders.

One of the military doctors testified it is my professional opinion that the major increases in incidences of the above discussed instances of miscarriages cancers and disease were due to these. Wow. That's terrifying, right? That you can go into a position and you're already, so, uh, you're already so vulnerable.

Like when you go to bootcamp, when you go to tech school, like the whole point of going to bootcamp is so they can literally like diminish your personality to a point where they can mold you to be a soldier, right? So you're already so vulnerable. You're already, you know, have all of these, uh, people of authority who are running on a bus, screaming at you is second.

You get into bootcamp and you know, you're really in this vulnerable position. And so the fact that they're now mandating that you get an experimental medication or spear mental drug within the first few days that you're there leading to a 1000% increase for young, healthy individuals in medical instances, such as Bell's palsy, myocardial infraction, and pulmonary embolisms, which is terrifying.

That's terrifying. Right? That's crazy. And we're not even seeing long-term data yet. Right. That thousand percent is literally just the last two years has nothing to do with long-term effects of this has nothing to do with long-term cancers or, you know, any of the long-term effects that we're going to see on this.

So it's going to be interesting to follow the data. I am not going to give my, you know, I'll go off of this article. I'll let you guys form your own opinion, but it's definitely weird that there's a thousand percent increase here. That's pretty crazy. And, uh, obviously we hope that all of our soldiers are okay and that these medical events tend to go away.

But I think it's a overall, you know, when, when th there's, um, there was also a certain percentage. I, I discussed this in one of my last podcasts where there was, I forget the number, but it was like an overall, uh, 80% increase in unexplained deaths for people from the age of 18 to like 38 or something. I forget what the exact statistics were, but it was just overall increases in death by like 80% over the last several years.

Um, so truly, truly terrifying. Um, I hope that, uh, this kind of, you know, ceases, um, moving forward, but anyways, all right, so the next thing we're going to walk through is the Russia and Ukraine war updates. Now, again, how I'm going to do this is I'm going to read verbatim the most recent speeches by both Vladimir Putin and Zelenskyi.

Now we've had some recent conversations from our white house and our white house press secretary discussing the food shortages. And so I did want to note that the main, one of the most recent, one of the most interesting conversations by Vladimir Putin most recently was the conversation that he had surrounding food shortages.

But what we're going to go over before we go over, that is just some general war updates. All right. So significant updates in the Russia Ukraine war. So the most recent one is that over 1000 Ukrainian soldiers who surrendered in miracle reportedly transferred to Russia for investigation. Then second one was that intra noble radiation detectors around nuclear power plants are back online for the first time since the invasion.

Second, the third one is that Russian forces are moving some from, and I'm gonna butcher these names of these cities. I promise you Russian forces moving from Zappa Zia area to Carson area to support defense positions threatened by Ukrainian attacks. Next one is about Donbass. So you creating a defenses holding in

Despite Russian attacks from three different directions. That's coming from a UK intelligence officer. And it goes on to say that Russian forces renew their offensive north east of Beck mute to allow them to reinforce operations in sever on Don ask and listen, chants area, Russian troops are continuing their efforts to advance insolvency risk and Islam area from Lehman.

I hope you don't listen to this podcast for my pronunciation of Russian cities, because I sure I disappointed you there, but you get the point. Those are the most recent major, uh, changes in the actual front of the war. Um, now it goes on to say that Ukrainian president Zelensky claims that Russia is losing an average of 300 troops aid.

To Ukrainian soldiers, Russia disputes, these claims, but does not disclose a figure in response Russia's foreign ministry claims that Ukraine is losing a significant number and is constantly having to replace units. They estimate losses could be averaging 300 to 400 a day. This number is disputed by Ukrainian president Selenski and he says that Ukraine is averaging 100 per day.

So they're both, they're both saying that each other is full of shit yet. Neither of them wants to give an actual figure. Although, I guess the Lensky has said that it was about 100, whereas Russia estimated it was 300 to 400 soldiers. Uh, so, um, according to those claims, you know, do with that information, what you will, uh, but that's the most recent, quick updates on the actual front of Ukraine.

Now, the next thing that we're going to discuss here is Putin's speech on food shore. All right now, I think this one's interesting because he actually talks about a lot of the politics around the world. He brings up the global order. Um, he brings up a lot of interesting points. Um, and we'll get to that in just a moment.

But first, the only way that you can support this podcast is by going to my website, red pill, revolution dot C o.com is for losers. Go to red pill, revolution dot C O right now. And now you can support the podcast in a couple of ways. The first way is by signing up for life insurance, right? Everybody's getting all worried about food shortages.

This is this next topic, right? Get your cans at wherever you get your food from, you know, pickle, some asparagus. I don't know what the hell you do. But one thing I do know is every single one of you, that's listening to this. I'm sorry to inform you, but at some point or another, you're going to die. You're going to die.

It's going to happen to you. I don't know if I'm the first person to tell this to you, but you're going to die. Okay. Eventually, I don't know if it's today. I hope it's not today. I hope it's in the far, far, far distance. But when you do die, I want your family to not despise you for all of the financial debt that you left them with.

So you can head over to the red pill revolution that CEO, you can click a little button there that says, get a quote. I got offered $63 a month for a $2 million policy. Imagine how much your wife, how much your husband would sing. Praises of love to you after you died in a terrible horrific situation. If you at least didn't leave them with a bunch of debt.

All right. So head over there right now, you can also go to the bottom of the website and you can sign up and subscribe to donate. So again, I appreciate you so much. That is the only way that I am able to continue this podcast and doing what I do. So thank you so much for considering it. Red pill, revolution.co, and hit that subscribe button right now.

If you didn't do it the first time I forgive you, but if you listen to this and you don't do it the second time, I might not. All right now, that's all I got.

All right. So now what we're going to do is we're going to talk about Putin speech on the food shortages. All right. So, um, this was a back and forth conversation, uh, with somebody who I don't know who they are, but his name is Pawel, uh, is a Rubin. And he says to Vladimir Putin, he says, Mr. President, we have just followed your meeting with the head of singalong, who is also the current leader of the African union.

He expressed an actually in the past week, many countries have expressed concern, not so much about the food crisis, but they are afraid of large scale famine because world food prices are climbing. And so our oil and gas prices, these issues are interrelated. Naturally the west blames Russia for this too.

What is the real situation at this point? How is it developing and what do you think will happen in the food and energy markets? Okay. What a great question. I think that was phrased very well. And let them report and begins to respond now. Um, the way that vitamin uprooting responds is he says, yes, indeed.

We are seeing attempts to place the responsibility on Russia for developments in the global food market and the growing problems there. I must say that this is another attempt to pin the blame on somebody else, but why first the situation with the global global food market did not become worse yesterday, or even with the launch of Russia's special military operation in Donbass, in Ukraine,

the situation took a downturn in February, 2020 during the efforts to counter the Corona virus pandemic. When the global economy was down in, had to be revived the financial and economic authorities in the United States of all things found nothing better than to allocate large amounts of money to support the population and certain businesses and economic sectors.

We generally did almost the same thing, but I assure you that we are. We were much more accurate and the results are obvious. We did this selectively and got the desired results without affecting macro economic indicators, including excessive inflation growth. The situation was quite different in the United States.

The money supply in the United States grew by 5.9 trillion in less than two years from February, 2020 to the end of 2021 unprecedented productivity of the money printing machines, the total cash supply grew by 38.5% 38.6. I'm sorry. Apparently the U S financial authorities believed the dollar was a global currency and it would spread as usual as it did in previous years would dissolve in the global economy and the United States would not even feel it, but that did not happen.

Not this time. Vladimir Putin said, as a matter of fact, decent. And there are such people in the United States, the secretary of the treasury recently said they had made a mistake. So it was a mistake made by the U S financial and economic authorities. It had nothing to do with Russia's actions in Ukraine.

It is totally unrelated. Vladimir Putin says, and that was the first step and a big one towards the current unfavorable food market situation. Because in the first place, food prices immediately went up. They grew, this is the first reason he says. The second reason was European countries, shortsighted policies, and above all the European commission's policy.

In regard to energy, we see what is going on there. Personally, I, as in Vladimir Putin, believe that many political players in the United States and Europe have been taking advantage of people's natural concerns about the climate climate change. And they began to promote this green agenda, including the energy.

So now he's pointing to the way that our government and political system is politicizing, you know, global warming or whatever they call it now. Okay. And all seems fine, except for the unqualified and groundless recommendations about what needs to be done in the energy sector. The capabilities of alternative types of energy are overestimated solar wind, any other types and hydrogen power.

Those are good prospects for the future probably, but today they cannot be produced in the required amount with their required quality and at acceptable prices. And at the same time, Vladimir Putin says they began to be little, the importance of conventional types of energy, including and above all hydrocarbons.

What was the result of this? He says banks stopped issuing loans because they were under pressure insurance companies stopped insuring. Local authorities stopped allocating plots of land for expanding production in reduced the construction of special transports, including pipelines. All this led to a shortage of investment in the world, energy sector and price hikes.

As a result, the wind was not as strong as expected during the past year winter dragged on and prices instantly sword. On top of all of that, the Europeans did not listen to our pres persistent requests to preserve long-term contracts for the delivery of natural gas to European countries. They started to wind them down.

Many are still valid. Now we have a couple paragraphs last on this portion. Many are still valid, but they started winding them down. This had a negative effect on the European energy market. The prices went up. Russia has absolutely nothing to do with this. Now it's interesting how, you know, thought out this conversation has been, you know, what he's pointed to so far was the shutting down of pipe.

The printing of 38.6% of our overall currency, as well as the, uh, downturn of, uh, contracts sent out and loans being sent to energy companies, um, all causing this rise in global prices and food shortages. Now it says that, but as soon as gas prices started going up, fertilizer prices followed suit because gas is used to produce some of these fertilizers.

Everything is interconnected. As soon as fertilizers prices started growing many businesses, including those in European countries became unprofitable and started shutting down altogether. Putin said the amount of fertilizer in the world market took a dive and prices soared dramatically, much of the surprise, much to the surprise of many European politicians.

However, we warned them about this, and this is not linked to Russia's military operations in Don Boston. This has nothing to do with it. But when we launched our operation, our so-called European and American partners started taking steps that aggravated the situation in both the food and fertilizer production markets, by the way, Russia accounts for 25% of the fertilizer market, as for Patash fertilizers.

Now this is a translation from somewhere. Um, so there's probably a little bit of funky little verbiage here when it comes to Patosh fertilizers, Russia, and Belarus account for 45% of the world markets. This is a tremendous amount. The crop yield depends on the quantity of fertilizers put into the soil.

As soon as it became clear that our fertilizers would not be in the world market prices instantly stored on both fertilizers and food products, because there are no fertilizers. It is impossible Purdue to produce the required amount of agricultural products. One thing leads to another and Russia has nothing to do with it.

Our partners made a host of mistakes themselves. And now they're looking for someone to blame. Of course, Russia is the most suitable candidate in this respect. Okay. So that is Vladimir Putin's, uh, opinion as to why we are potentially running into food shortages. Why our gas prices are soaring, um, to the point where, uh, you know, everybody's starting and only fans, you know, and showing themselves, you know, I'm going to start and only fans and literally just go to the gas pump and just, you know, metaphorically get fucked there.

Maybe people will fund my, uh, gas adventures that way. If I started only fans where you literally just go to the gas station and show yourself at the gas pump, it probably suits the platform. Um, anyways, so I thought that was interesting. It went pretty in depth there around the macro economics as to why.

He believes we're having an energy crisis, why he believes gas prices are soaring, um, at least on this side of the world and why these potential famine conversations are coming up. Okay. Um, now we pointed to a lot of things there, right? The fertilizer market is an interesting one. It's not one that, you know, I've heard anybody discuss surrounding this, um, the energy crisis regarding, um, you know, uh, the way that he explained it about wind solar and all of the other ways that we're looking to kind of expand on these, you know, the electric market for electric vehicles.

Yeah. That's all fine. But even if we, you know, literally everybody got an electric vehicle. Where where's that power coming from? Where's the electricity coming from? Because what I saw was there was a, I believe it was a Senator was getting questions surrounding, uh, where, you know, she was like boasting about how a certain percentage or somebody, you know, like basically started with electric vehicles and what, after being questioned, they found that the only way that they're able to actually supply enough energy for the electricity for these vehicles was through coal, like natural gas, like what it's just trading.

One thing for the other, only that what's actually happening here is our politicians have gotten so balls deep invested into these energy companies and into the, you know, the battery companies who are over mining in Afghanistan and all of these other lithium rich places. They've they're so balls deep in investing into these companies that they need this to work.

They have so much millions of doubt. Pelosi probably has, you know, uh, Epstein island under some of these lithium companies and needs to make her money. Right. It needs to get her, her, uh, her profits out of it. So what they're doing is they're trying to pass as many policies they're trying to, you know, in my opinion, there's, uh, an inflation of prices for gas.

It could potentially even be, uh, um, intentional at this point because they have so much money invested in these electric vehicle card markets working that now they want to force your hands, right. They even talked about, uh, giving twice a $25,000 subsidy or tax write-off or something to people to purchase an electric vehicle.

I think that was in one of the legislative, um, something that they were one of the bills that they were trying to pass. It was like sneakers. Position on page 36,074 or something, um, where they were going to give subsidies to people to pay for an electric vehicle. Now, when they do that, right, they pull out of, um, you know, they pull out of Afghanistan suddenly, very intentionally.

They pull out of Afghanistan, one of the most lithium rich countries in the world only to have immediately the Taliban doing a deal with China for the lithium deposits. Hm. Oh. And also all of our politicians are in some way, shape or form or another invested into electric vehicles working out and your gas vehicle going away.

I don't know who am I I'm sure. None of this is interconnected. All right. So the next thing, and the next topic that we're going to discuss here is a Vladimir Putin. So this is an article from. I believe it's a Newsweek New York post. All right. The New York post says Vladimir Putin has cancer and likely survived in assassination attempt.

And that is from a U S intelligence analyst. It goes on to say that the us intelligence community believes that Russian president Vladimir Putin's health is suffering and that he is being treated for cancer. The assessment attributed to Newsweek was attributed to high ranking officials at three separate intelligence agencies and comes months after speculation that the Russian strongman is suffering from terminal ailments.

Hootin is definitely sick and official from the office of the director of national intelligence, told the outlet while noting whether he's going to die soon is mere speculation.

Two other officials, one from the defense intelligence agency and one retired air force officer also claimed to have access to a comprehensive Intel or intelligence assessment of Putin's. And said the outlook for the Russian leader is bleak. According to the report. Now, one thing that a few people have noted, I think I even heard Joe Rogan talk about it was that, um, recently you've seen the pictures of Vladimir Putin and his face looks like almost inflated, like, um, like he has some type of anemia, um, or like, uh, right in the EMEA.

No, that's not the word. Is that the word? Anemia? I don't know. Water. I think it's anemia. Let's look it up. Am I wrong? Hm it's like a, when water starts to like, um, anemia is defined as a low number of red blood cells, I was completely wrong. What does it, when your body's holding water? What's the word? Tell me anybody.

Anybody? No. All right. Well, water retention, 40 types. Uh, we're not gonna find it move in on. All right. So he's holding. Right. Hypertension. That's wrong. Hypertension is high blood pressure. All right. Um, so Putin script is strong. Uh, the intelligence community also reports and believes that Putin is increasingly paranoid about his hold of power and that he may have survived in this fascination attempt in March.

Putin's grip is strong, but no longer absolute said one in senior intelligence officer. He says the jockeying inside the Kremlin has never been more intense during his rule. Everyone's sensing that the end is near the officials also warns that Putin as Putin has become increasingly isolated access to credible intelligence has also become more difficult to obtain one source of our best intelligence, which is contact with outsiders largely dried up as a result of the Ukrainian war.

The senior DIA official said noting that as Putin has fewer meetings with foreign leaders, there are fewer opportunities to learn about his. It goes on to say that we need to be mindful of the influence of wishful thinking. The retired air force leader said still, the sources said that following televised appearance in April, in which the Russian leader was seen awkwardly gripping a table while meeting with his defense minister, the intelligence community told the white house that Putin was ill and most likely dying.

Well, those are two completely different things, you know, being ill and dying. I don't know, kind of separate rumors of Putin's immense demise have been reported since the early days of his invasion of Ukraine in early April, Russia, investigative journalism outlet. The project reported that Putin was quite ill and had been receiving regular visits from a noted Russian oncologist.

The other account was followed by multiple reports, some from telegram channels, supposedly aligned with Kremlin dissidents that the ex KGB man was due to undergo various surgeries or was looking for a potential six. Regardless of Putin's health, the DIA official warned against underestimating. The Russian president.

He's still very dangerous in chaos. Does lay ahead. If he does die, we need to focus on that and be ready. Interesting. Um, so apparently not only is he dodging cancer, but he's also dodging assassination attempts. I wish we got more information on either of those. Um, but I don't know. Um, I, I think that, you know, there's been a lot of talks about this.

There's been a lot of people who believe that, uh, Vladimir Putin has been sick for a while. Now. There was actually a whole report that I saw that looked at all of his absences. So like all of the timeframes, um, that he had been, uh, basically out of the public eye for extended periods of time and the actual logs of who was coming and going from seeing him during the.

And a lot of them noted that a Russian oncologist, um, so interesting. And it does even speak to the fact that what would happen if he did die, right. That would obviously cause a huge power vacuum. Um, and then would cause you know, uh, a big power struggle, especially during this time of war, that would, I don't know.

I don't know. Um, so, and then another thing is the assassination attempt. I've heard some crazy wild stories about the fascination that times not only assassination in times on Vladimir Putin, but also. Uh, him assassinating other people. There was a report surrounding the fact that, um, if you were an official at the table of the negotiations on behalf of your president for Ukraine or Russia, you are actually just as likely to die as a soldier on the front lines, there was like three or four assassinations of officials who were at the table of negotiations, um, during, uh, underneath both Putin and Zelensky.

Um, so that sounds terrifying. I don't want to be assassinated. It sounds like there's been several attempts on him. And, uh, he also, uh, potentially has cancer. Um, you know, maybe he's gotten better, maybe that oncologist helped and maybe he's no longer dealing with it. But what I do know is if you go back and look at some of the pictures of him from before and now you see that water retention, um, on his face, which happens when you start to take, uh, some of those medications for that water retention.

Um, so anyways, moving on now, what we're going to read now is going to be, uh, actually Zelenskyi his speech on the war, and then we're going to discuss Putin's speech on the war. Okay. Now, uh, Zelensky speech is kind of hype. He starts it with like a big, like, you know, Ukrainians. This was on June 8th. So roughly five days ago, this is what's the lens he said regarding the war.

He said, Ukrainian. All of our defenders exactly 10 years ago, this day marked the start of Euro 2012, the European football championships, which brought together all Ukrainians and poles, Ukrainians, and the vast majority of Europeans, the opening ceremony was in Warsaw. The final ceremony was in our Capitol in Kiev.

The matches were hosted in different cities of our two countries and in particular, in Donetsk and the Donbass area only 10 years have passed. And it seems that that was another world just today. The occupiers announced the absolutely crazy news that they were preparing to unite some football clubs from all occupied territories into one pseudo championship from  curse, Melo, Paul Crimea, and even part of Georgia.

It's just a mockery of the occupiers over people who remember everything. Well, 10 years ago, our dynamic was a strong, proud and developed city in the rush. Came, uh, and then Russia came, brought ideas of just, uh, of just such an attic inadequate level. And now it is a ghost town that has lost most people, thousands of lives and absolutely all prospects, only the return of Ukraine, which will definitely happen.

Only our flag in only Ukrainian law will mean a normal life for these territories, for these cities. Again, the life that was there, peaceful, safe, and open to the world. And of course, new matches of world-class teams at the Donbass arena. Now he must have been like speaking at an actual event or something at some, you know, a soccer arena.

Um, I am grateful to president of Poland, a friend of the Ukrainians for the fact that he has now started a special trip to European countries to support the European project. Of our country, this June, we are going to get a decision on the candidacy. Now he's speaking on of them joining the European union, which would eventually lead to potential ties, um, for the UN, which is the whole reason that Putin said that he started this war in the first place, was that he did not want Ukraine to become a part of the UN.

Now, if you crane becomes a part of the UN, then what happens? Well, then there's a treaty. And I would assume that we would have other countries go into war on Ukraine's behalf based on that treaty. So that's what he's speaking to right now. It says president of Slovakia, Zuzanna Kapito VA was to go with Andrea, such a joint initiative of the two leaders was planned, a positive cotinine or COVID-19 test hindered it while these are the conditions of our life.

Now I spoke today as the German chancellor of. About the decision in favor of Ukraine or the candidacy as well, which in fact will be a decision in favor of Europe. We talked about defense support and about food security guaranteeing, which is really a global interest already because no one can be interested except the Russian state in the global food crisis.

I addressed today, the participants of the investment contract or conference organized to discuss the economic prospects of our state representatives of the world's largest funds were among the participants. Although the event was not public, it was still very important and powerful. I invited them to invest in Ukraine, invest, invest with, you know, large weaponry tanks, uh, you know, fighter jets.

It is very important for me that that was me speaking, not Zelenskyi. Um, it is very important for me to see such an audience. And these, I emphasize again, are representative of the most influential part of American. Believes that these sanctions against Russia should be strengthened. Therefore it would be right for politicians to hear this position leading business and the majority of American and European societies, that there is still not enough pressure on the Ukrainian Federation to end this war.

According to the results of this day, the a hundred and fifth day of the full-scale war, um, sever on dynastic remains the epicenter of the confrontation than dumbass. We defend our positions, inflict, inflict, significant losses on the enemy. This is a very fierce battle, very difficult, probably one of the most difficult throughout the war.

I am grateful to everyone who defends this direction. In many ways, the fate of our Donbass is being decided there. I also designed decrees on awarding our heroes 285 combatants were awarded state awards in 68 of them. Post humorously, eternal memory to all who gave their lives for. Eternal glory to our heroes who defend the state glory to Ukraine.

I can't imagine being in like a fist fight at a bar and, and while I'm getting like punched in the face, uh, you know, looking to the big guy in the corner and like being like, Hey, Hey, you know, maybe a, I don't know, focus on what's going on there instead of, you know, calling on us to put in financial sanctions and even more interesting was a speech that, uh, as Olenski gave during the, uh, during the world economic forum, uh, it was about two and a half weeks ago.

So a little bit before this speech. Um, but he was basically making a cry out to the world economic forum and all these global leaders to basically get in on the fight saying it's a global issue that they're new view. Think that they're going to stop it, Ukraine, you're wrong. And if it's me, you know, potentially you're next and you know, um, this whole deal.

I dunno. So we'll move on. The next thing that we'll discuss is Putin speech on the war, and it will be interesting to see kind of the differences in approaches now, um, where Putin was speaking was that a national event, like a parade kind of like our Memorial day, where it was surrounding the soldiers who had lost their lives and more.

And I believe this was in like some huge stadium. Um, and so, uh, you'll hear some of his conversations surrounding that this was a little bit earlier, but this is the most recent conversation from Putin that I can find was on May 9th, 2022. And I've looked through every transcript of every conversation that he has available over the last month and a half.

So this is the most written recent conversation that he had was during this like Memorial day type ceremony on May 9th, he mentions NATO. He mentions the United States. He mentions, uh, You mentioned the United States several times. Um, he mentioned how they're, you know, boasting and claiming their own exceptionalism and how, uh, basically how the west seems to want to cancel their old traditional values and cultures.

Um, so we'll talk about that right now. So he says on May 9th, 2022, Putin goes on to say, we take pride in the unconquered, courageous generations of the victors. We are proud of being their successors and it is our duty to preserve the memory of those who defeated Nazi-ism and entrusted us being vigilant and doing everything to thwart the horror of another global war.

Now side note, that is an interesting thing that Putin has talked about this entire time is the comparison between Germany during world war II and the Nazi-ism and knots defying. Um, the, you know, Donbass region and specifically the Azov regime. Now you can go online right now. If you're listening to this, your ass has an internet connection and you can Google or don't Google go to brave browser and use search dot brave, um, and look up the Azov battalion, the Azov regime, and you can see pictures upon pictures upon pictures of them flaunting a Nazi flag, flaunting a Nazi flag.

Okay. Now this is the same people that Facebook decided to change their policies against about several months ago, two to three months ago, Facebook originally did not allow positive speech did not allow support of the Razov regime because they're Nazis in some way. Okay. At least they support Nazi principles and have Nazi symbolism all over them and their flags.

So Facebook did not allow support of the Azov regime. Two to three months ago. They changed their policies quietly in the dead of the night to allow support for the Azov regime, allow support for a literal Nazi party. Okay. So this is a verifiable claim from Putin saying, and making these comparisons to the Nazi Germany of world war two, when there is the Azov regime, touting Nazi flags all over, all over, you can find those pictures.

Okay. So just wanted to throw that out there. He's not just frivolously, throwing out claims of their Nazis, you know, like, uh, Antifa likes to do about everybody that they disagree with. There's legitimate. And Ukraine. Okay. So just one of the point that out, it's not just, usually they're not throwing things out there.

There's legitimate claims here. Okay. So he goes on to say, therefore, despite all controversies in international relations, Russia has always advocated the establishment of an equal and indivisible security system, which is critically needed for the entire international community. Last December, we proposed signing a treaty on the security guarantees.

Russia urged the west to hold an honest dialogue and search for meaningful and compromising solutions and to take account of each other's interests. All in vain, NATO countries did not want to heat to us, which means they had totally different plans. And we saw it. Putin went on to say another punitive operation.

Then Don Boston invasion of our historic lands, including Crimea was openly in the. Okay. Now I'll repeat that. He says that he, another punitive operation in Don boss in invasion of our historic land, speaking of the former Soviet union, the former Soviet union Don boss, and that portion of Ukraine was a part of the Soviet union prior.

Okay. So another punitive operation than Dom Boston invasion of our historic lands, including Crimea was openly in the making Kiev declared that it could attain nuclear weapons. The NATO block launched an active military buildup on the territories adjacent to us. Thus an absolutely unacceptable threat to us was steadily being created right on our borders.

Putin said there was every indication that they clash with neo-Nazis in band rights, backed by the United States and their minions was unavoidable. That's a big claim.

United States backed neo-Nazis, which is literally what it is. If the United States is sending weapons and sending money, like, you know, the $66 billion that we've sent to Ukraine. So far $66 billion, which as I talked about before, would equal a hundred and, or I'm sorry, of the equal $640,000 almost to each one of the 106,000 elementary schools to help a security measures.

Just to give you the idea of what 66 billion actually looks like. Okay. That's what we've been sending to these organizations to Ukraine, right? Just a blank check. Let me repeat. We saw the military infrastructure Houdin goes on to say being built up hundreds of foreign advisers, starting work in regular supplies of cutting edge weaponry being delivered from NATO.

The threat grew every day,

Russia locked, Russia launched a preemptive strike at the aggression. It was a forest timely and the only correct decision, a decision by a sovereign strong and independent country, the United States began claiming their exceptionalism, particularly after the collapse of the Soviet union, thus denigrating, not just the entire world, but also their satellites who have to pretend not to see anything into obediently, put up with it.

But we are a different country. Russia has a different character. We will never give up our love for our motherland. Putin says our faith and traditional values. Our ancestors come customs and respect for all people in. Meanwhile, the west seems to be set to cancel these millennia old values, such moral degradation, underlies the cynical falsifications of world war II history, escalating Russia, phobia, praising traders, mocking their victims memories and crossing out the courage of those who won the victory through suffering.

We are aware that us veterans who wanted to come to the parade in Moscow were actually forbidden to do so, but I want them to know we are proud of your deeds and your contribution to our common victory. Speaking about world war II, we honor all soldiers of the allied armies, the Americans, the English, the French resistance fighters, brave soldiers and partisans in China.

All of those who defeated Nazi-ism and military prism.

There, you have it. There is Selenski speech. There is Putin speech, both the most recent conversations surrounding the war. Now they're both painting very, very different pictures, right? If we try and like break this down to a very simplistic approach of why each one is saying, you know why this happened is right now, if you go back to the very, very first podcast I did about this, when this all broke out, I read Hootens original speech.

And in his original speech, he mentioned the United States 11 times without mentioning Ukraine a single time, which again, and then following it with the fact that Russia is a, one of the biggest nuclear powers in the world and is unafraid of using it. Okay. Mentioned the United States 11 times. Okay. If that doesn't concern you, you're not paying close enough.

Right. Especially with the escalating conversations around Taiwan, which escalated even more today and that, you know, what I'll even touch on that because I think that's interesting and notable to have a conversations around. Well, first I do think it's interesting. I do think that there's a reason to kind of just super simplistically highlight why.

Okay. Russia is saying that you, crane was building up its infrastructure backed by the United States and by NATO and the UN to eventually invade. Right. At least that's what it sounded like. Okay. So he believes that they were putting, now people have compared it to this. Imagine if Mexico did they deal with China and allowed China to put rockets and nuclear missiles and all of this military infrastructure right along the borders of Mexico and right on the borders of Canada.

Okay. That starts to look a little. Right. Would we allow? That is another question. Okay. So he was saying that they were starting to build up these, uh, this infrastructure for potential war against Russia. Russia goes on to say that if they be car became a part of the UN, then they would be a potential immediate threat to Russia, which is why they decided to go in preemptively.

Okay. Now Ukraine is saying that they're just completely innocent, that they have nothing to do with this and that for some reason, big mean Putin decided to just jump into their land and start, you know, killing their soldiers. So who's right. I'm not going to say time will tell history will tell generally written by the person who wins the wars.

Okay. But what I do know is that things are escalating fast, right? I was also kind of weird to me that there's really not much conversations around. What is actually going on in the day-to-day right. If you don't follow any specific channels to follow the war, you're really not seeing it much. At least I'm not at least not what we were at the very beginning of this, right?

When the big like mass, uh, you know, um, exit this of, uh, profile pictures from liberal Facebook profiles went, went from I'm, you know, vaccinated to a Ukraine flag. Um, you know, so around that same, same time, uh, all this information started to come out about why the war was happening about what was going on there and all these, you know, all this, uh, huge, crazy propaganda from the ghost of Kiev to the Ukrainian father, crying into his daughter's arms, which we found out was all fake.

Uh, but we haven't seen much, right. At least I haven't, I don't know. I follow some channels on this and that's kind of where I got some of his information. Um, but if you don't follow those same channels, I think you're really not getting it in the mainstream. Um, it's, it's pretty wild that something can just massively takeover the collective unconscious of all of the United States at a single time.

And then just literally fizzle away the second that, uh, you know, a decently attractive couple gets into some type of, you know, legal battle on public television. And speaking of the January 6th, uh, meetings have been happening recently. And, uh, what ended up happening there that was interesting is that Nancy Pelosi hired a former, uh, director or executive of some, like, I think it was like ABC or somebody news, um, to try and make their January six committee situation like this big production, like thinking it was going to catch on like the Amber heard situation.

I haven't heard that anything from it. Uh, one thing I did hear was attorney general, William Barr speaking a little bit about 2000 mules where he kind of diminished it, uh, from a certain perspective, um, saying that, you know, you could have gotten the cell phone data from anywhere, which I think is interesting, something for you to look into.

Uh, but the last topic that we'll discuss here today is going to be the escalating tensions with China and the U S today. So it says that the U S secretary of defense in Chinese defense minister issued dueling statements after holding their first face-to-face meeting. This comes after China's defense minister told us secretary of defense Lloyd Austin, that China would go to war over Taiwan.

If independence is declared in the rare press conference defense minister said we will re resolutely crush any attempt to pursue Taiwan independence. Let me make this clear. If anybody dares to secede Taiwan from China, we will not hesitate. We will fight at all costs. And we will fight to the very end.

I want to make clear to those seeking Taiwan, independence and those behind them. The pursuit of Taiwan independence is a dead end. Secretary secretary Lloyd Austin spoke to the press shortly after defense minister Fang Vangee and said maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait. Isn't just a us interest.

It's a matter of international, secure or international concern. Let me be clear. We do not see confrontation or conflict, and we do not seek a new cold war. We will defend our interests without flinching.

And then there's this video that you can actually watch of him, like going on. Um, I don't know if we can hear it here, but, um, the, the top, uh, comment on here says, well, one of the top common says, ah, somebody get the Chinese defense minister, a joint man needs to chill out.

The next one says all over the world, we are seeing echoes of the 1930s history. Doesn't repeat, but it diff definitely rhymes. Quite interesting. Right? That is a, that is a really powerful statement. Uh, you know, immediately following, you know, saying that anybody who's addressing their independence or their secession from China.

I dunno if you go back and look at any of the history books that we have from the time I was in school, Taiwan's always been a separate country, as far as I'm concerned, as far as I can remember, they've been a country. It's not like they're seceding from China. Taiwan has literally never been a part of.

In our history. Okay. Now they're trying to take this approaching Gaslight. There are people just the same way that, you know, some people are saying that Putin is doing that about Ukraine. Oh, well this is ours. It's always been ours. And they're just trying to act like they're somebody else's. Um, and if you fuck with us, we're going to go to war with you.

I don't know. But I do think that it's quite concerning seeing all of these tensions, escalating, we've never seen a hot war in my lifetime. That's the scale of this, at least not openly. Right. It's you know, we've seen many, many bombs dropped by the United States specifically over the last several decades.

Um, but nothing that was an actual declaration of war against a sovereign nation. Um, so it's. I'll keep saying that it's concerning, you know, because all of a sudden China gets involved and goes after Taiwan. Then the United States steps in then Europe, Russia steps in, and then it's just this domino effect of large scale war that has the potential to break out very quickly, very quickly.

And now we see our secretary of defense and the defense minister of China, uh, battling back and forth with their words surrounding war.

So to me, it's concerning. Um, I, I, you know, w as far as the Taiwan and China situation, it's very clear cut. It's very clear cut. What's happening here. And then the situation of Putin and Ukraine, it's very clear. Cut there. Ukraine was its own country, right? I'm not taking sides on any of this. Ukraine was a stone country.

Maybe don't invade people if you're using. Maybe don't, you know, have allied treaties with countries who are going to piss off one of the greatest superpowers immediately next door to you and potentially risk getting into a war. Oh. And maybe don't be a Nazi. Maybe that's a good starting point. Don't be a Nazi.

So that's what I have for you guys. I hope you enjoyed it. Uh, thank you so much for listening. Um, if you have any other, uh, things you want to discuss, go ahead and leave a comment. You can find me on Tik TOK. You can find me on Instagram, truth, social, wherever the hell you're at at red pill revolt is where you can find me.

Um, thank you so much for listening. I hope you took something out of this conversation. I know we have not been hearing a lot about this lately. Um, so I just wanted to do a quick update. We will jump into more topics. We'll expand here. Um, I think the next few topics we'll have, I have written out are pretty awesome.

So make sure you stay tuned, make sure you hit that subscribe button. Uh, again, head over to red pill, revolution.com. If you didn't hear me already. Is for losers, red pill, revolution dot C O go ahead and get yourself some life insurance because you're going to die. And you don't want your family to hate you.

Um, go ahead and support the podcast by becoming a monthly subscriber. Uh, this is something I spend a lot, a lot of my time on, I have a full-time job. Um, I have a business. I have, uh, children, I have a family, I have a life outside of this, but I still find the time at 10 o'clock at night five in the morning, one in the morning to get this stuff done for you.

And it would mean the world to me. The best thing you can do is head over to red pill, revolution.com, click on the link, get yourself some life insurance. Like I said, I got a $2 million policy for $60 a month. Right now, if I die, I think my wife will be. But I think she'll be a little less sad if she has $2 million in the bank.

So maybe you might want to think about that red pill revolution, that CEO, click the link, get yourself some life insurance. It takes it's super fast, 95% approval ratings. Um, you don't have to speak to anybody. Right? I come from an insurance background like yours, different life of mine. I was, I owned an insurance agency.

And, um, when you usually go get life insurance, it's like the shittiest thing in the world. You put your information in online. You, you know, you get like 30 calls from a bunch of people trying to lie to you and sell you shit. This doesn't do any of that. My recommendation, if you don't know anything about insurance, get a, um, get a 15 year term life policy.

Don't do any of that whole life bullshit. They're just trying to take your money 15 year term life policy at 15 times. Um, your income okay. Per year. All right. That should be enough. All right. Thank you guys so much. Thank you for listening and welcome to the revolution. Have a great day.

----more----

In this week's episode, we discuss the Uvalde, Texas shooting again now that the smoke has cleared and more information has started to come out. We discuss the three different sides, including the perspective that it was tragic and that everything that could have been done was done. The second is that more could have been done in the response. The third is by those who are questioning the mainstream narrative altogether. We also discuss the heroism displayed by many parents during this time of distress, including a mother who was arrested only to escape, jump a fence and save her children. Finally, we discussed the law enforcement's approach and if there was more that could be done. All of that and more on this week's episode!

  Welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams. Red pill revolution started out with me realizing every thing that I knew, everything that I believed, everything I interpret about my life is through the lens of the information I was spoonfed as a child, religion, politics, history, conspiracies, Hollywood medicine, money, food, all of it, everything we know was tactfully written to influence your decisions and your view on reality by those in power.

Now I'm on a mission, a mission to retrain and reeducate myself to find the true reality of what is behind that curtain. And I'm taking your ass with me. Welcome to the rebel.

Hello, and welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams. Thank you so much for listening today. I appreciate it so much from the bottom of my heart today, we have a very, very interesting episode. It is now been a week or so since the tragic horrific, uh, shooting that happened in you validate Texas.

Um, and now it's time that the smoke has cleared a little bit. We have a little bit more information in, and I think it's time that we dive deeper into this topic. Now, the first episode that we did on you validate was basically about how our politicians reactions were just completely inappropriate, uh, how it was almost saddening to see the politicized.

Of the way that our politicians just kind of went about addressing this right? From, from president Biden to Kamala Harris, basically everything that they had to say about the shooting had to do in some way with gun control in some way with, you know, shaming other politicians. Um, and so today we're going to kind of look at the facts right there.

There's a lot of different controversies that have come out of this. Um, there's a lot of different viewpoints that people have when it comes to this situation and we're going to touch on all of them. I'm going to try and take as much as I possibly can. A non-biased approach in explaining to you guys the three, what I believe to be the three most common belief systems surrounding you validate taxes and the shooting that occurred.

Okay. So I'll take you through what those three things are. Okay. The first viewpoint that I see being somewhat common is that it was a tragic, terrible, horrible. The police did everything. They could. They, they, they were in there according to some sources. Uh, they didn't wait outside. Um, they did what they should've done.

Okay. That's one viewpoint. The next viewpoint is that it was a terrible tragedy. It was horrific. And the police, the sheriffs, the whoever was on the scene at the time did not do exactly what they should have done. They did not go in soon enough. Um, they did not, you know, follow their own guidelines of their own, you know, uh, books and trainings that they had on this, that somebody dug up where it speaks about how to address this situation.

Um, so that's the secondary, uh, approach to this? Is that not only was it, you know, obviously it was a terrible horrific tragedy and, um, but also the fact that maybe there should have been a different response. Okay. And then the third one, the most controversial opinion on this topic is that, uh, something that we've been seeing a lot around is questioning the narrative.

Okay. Now I have to tread quite lightly on that side of things. Um, we w like I said, this is going to be to the best of my abilities, a non-biased approach to going over what these viewpoints are, why people may believe that the police did do the right thing, why people believe maybe they didn't do the wrong thing, and why people believe or disbelieve the narrative that has been going on here.

Okay. Now you'll see, I have to tiptoe pretty, really pretty well with the way that I'm going to approach this, but I will try my best. So that is going to be our episode. All right. That's what we're going to be touching on the three different kind of viewpoints on that today. Um, so I hope you stick around.

It's going to be a great episode. I have a lot more things kind of organized for this podcast. I think it could be fairly clumsy if I just went about it my normal way, where I just kind of, you know, frivolously talk like I'm sitting at the bar with you. So I put together a little bit of a, a little, a little, a couple, few points that I want to touch on and some things.

So, um, again, thank you so much for listening. If you could go ahead and hit that subscribe button, all right. It takes, it takes five seconds out of your day. That's it just takes five seconds. You know, if there's one thing that you can do right now, that will make somebody's day, that will give you good karma is to hit that subscribe button.

It takes five seconds. It means the world. To me, it means the world to my family. It means the world, um, to how much effort and energy that I put into this. Um, so hit that subscribe button. If you're on apple podcasts, Spotify. Wherever the hell you are right now, listening to this podcast, subscribe and leave a five star review.

That's the biggest thing if you've subscribed, but you haven't left a review. It means the world to me, I'm sitting at 99 reviews right now. How is that acceptable? One more and I hit a hundred. So let yourself be that hundredth review. Um, again, it would mean the world to me. Uh, just write down what you think, you know, your favorite episode, whatever the hell it is that you want to write down in there, write down something that helps us get more, um, higher up on the algorithms for apple podcasts and some other things.

So again, that's all I got for you right now. Um, thank you so much for listening. Subscribe hit that five star review button. Thank you.

All right. Now the very first part of this that I would like to talk to, um, is kind of some of the sources surrounding the way that I've been kind of gaining my, uh, perspective on this. Okay. Now it's very difficult when you know, every day and every scenario right now, it's difficult to touch on. Um, I really tried to get a non-biased opinion.

So there's a few new sources that I follow. And the one that I've been seeing do the best job following the, you validate Texas shooting to this point has been a, not so small. I started following this, this, uh, Instagram account probably at the very beginning of the Maxwell trials. I think we probably started our accounts around the same exact time.

Um, and they've just been crushing. It, it, it's, it's a great platform. It's where I get a lot of my, what I feel to be non-biased opinions. Um, and some really like boots on the ground, hard nose bad-ass journalists. Um, and that is real news. No bullshit on Instagram. Um, I think they got a website. I don't know what the URL is, but real news, no bullshit on Instagram.

It has a tremendous, I mean, they are literally in, you validate the last several days interviewing from what I've seen so far, they went and knocked on the door of the parents of the shooter. Okay. He has no name to me. He is a nobody. He's the horrific shooter in this incident. So he has no name, but he, they knocked on his parent's door.

And, uh, the, I guess the mom answered, she said, douchey didn't want to talk to him. Um, so then they, uh, father came out and asked them to leave. They respectfully said, okay, they walked away. Um, they did not push any further, but they wanted to at least see if they could get a comment. Okay. Now, when they did that, they actually got a man from across the street who declined to being on camera, but they showed a little bit of him, um, during this conversation and they interviewed this individual.

Now I'm not going to show this, this direct interview, but it had some key highlighted points. It was fairly long. Um, but the key points to me were that this individual said that he was like the, the, the, the town dad, right? They were the, this. Shoot or lived in a trailer park and you validate taxes. This guy said that, you know, I had all the kids come over, he had a pool table downstairs.

They all like to play video games. He said they didn't really see anything off about this individual. Um, it had been a couple of years since he had been over there. Uh, but what he felt was that, you know, it was, it was a, there was some key points that he had regarding the parents in this situation. Okay.

So they interviewed this guy who was across the street from where the mom lived of the shooter. And what he said was that, first of all, he had no expenses, right? There's all this talk around. Where did they get all the ammo? Where do they get the, the, um, you know, the Daniel defense I'm for, where did he get the other rifle?

Where did he get the, you know, all of this, all this conversations surrounding the financial aspects of it. And he said he had no bills. I guess somebody, I saw a few times that the guy worked at Wendy's. I don't see anywhere that that's been substance. Uh, but I think it's interesting. So he said there's, he didn't think he had any bills.

Now, the individual, the shooter in this case, um, lived with his grandma. Okay. The mom, according to this guy who lived across the street from her was, uh, according to him, hooked on what he called ice, which is methamphetamines. And, um, and so her boyfriend got her hooked on meth and there was a horrible situation and they got in all sorts of arguments.

And so after a while, um, he ended up moving in with his grandma. Okay. Now what I think was the key point from that interview was actually that he, he said that, um, the grandma owns the trailer that the mom lived in of the shooter. Okay. Owns the trailer. The grandma did. Now. He went to live with the grandma, the grandma, if you recall, the actual facts of the situation ended up being the first victim.

Of his shooting spree. And so, um, now the key point that I want to take from that interview was that he said that two days prior, two days prior to this individual going and shooting this school up and Rob elementary school, and you validate taxes two days prior, the grandma was trying to evict his mother from their trailer because she was trying to sell it.

Now, the mother's response specifically was that she was going to burn them according to this man, burn the motherfucker down if before she'd let her get evicted. Okay. So apparently there was a very heated exchange between the grandma, between the mother, um, about her getting evicted from the, uh, from the trailer that she owned the grandma owned.

Okay. Now, if you want to talk about emotive. I've seen enough law and order to know that that it's a potential motive, right? That's a heated exchange between somebody that he feels dearly about. Um, so I think that's really important now. And even more interesting point about that is the fact that they, the police never even interviewed this man.

Never, never interviewed this man. Once he said he even went up to them and talk to them and like never not a single person came up to him. He like came out there and found real news, no bullshit over by the trailer. And like, Hey, you guys want to come talk to me? So he like sought them out. It wasn't that hard.

Okay. So, um, interesting point that the police have yet to interview this man, a man who lives right across the street, who has the potential idea of what the motive was in this situation. You think that that might be an interesting individual. For these police officers, the FBI, whoever the hell is on this case, I'm sure Scooby doo and all his friends are there too.

You think that this man would be a person of interest for them to interview, especially if he knows something about what was happening about the lives, about the mom's drug addictions, about the relationship between the grandma and the mother about, you know, so, so many intricate parts of this relationship.

He literally had a front row seat to this house and everything that happened there. Okay. So why is the police not interviewing this man? Why are they not talking to somebody who claims that two days prior? There was a huge altercation at this house. Why, why are they not talking to this man? Okay. I think that's interesting now the next thing that they discussed, um, or the next part of their story, which I'll play some of it here for you.

I kind of want to get away from playing too, too many longer clips for you guys. Um, so I'm going to try my best to tell these stories for you now, the next individual that they interviewed. Um, and again, this is real news, no bullshit on Instagram, tremendous journalism. The next person that they interviewed was a border patrol agent who drove 85 miles from 85 miles away at like 150 miles per hour.

He doesn't say how fast he's going. They go like a hundred. And he's like, yeah, faster than that, 85 miles, this man got there in 40 minutes. Somebody out there is much better at math than me and you guys can do the math, but 85 miles in about 40 minutes. And, uh, he said that he got there and I'll play a little bit of this clip here.

I think maybe we'll we'll touch on this, but basically what this man says is. He got there. He was curious as soon as he got there, it took him. So it took him 45 minutes to get there. They radioed in, there was 45 minutes. This man hauls ass, 85 miles away from the border let's go of for illegal immigrants so that he can go handle.

This situation gets there. And the shooter still not taking care of right there, sitting outside. He said, now this is an important key point because there's been a lot of back and forth here when it comes to, were they outside? Were they inside? And we're going to dive deeper into those conversations. But I think it's important to note that this border patrol agent said that he got there and there were in there.

They still hadn't shot him. He was still in there. They retreated according to this man. They went in initially they received. And then they retreated, right? No injuries, no police are dead. At least from my knowledge, I don't believe any police died if they did that's horrific too. Um, but it, it tells me something that he was on scene at the time he was there and he says they went in and then they went out, they left the area, you know, the area that was being shot up by a single individual while there's 18, 20, however many guys sitting out there with their rifles ready, enable, and obviously not willing, but ready and able to be able to go in there.

Was it a breakdown in the chain of command? Was it a retreat because they weren't tactically ready? Was it? I don't know, but what I do know. Is that it should not take that long to get into a building. Now I said that would be non-biased, I'm going to try and retract and not retract because I believe every one of those things that I just said to you, but let's touch on the first topic here, which I think is important.

Now, one thing I think is a, is an important issue to touch on too, is, you know, a lot of people are saying, why is this happening in the U S right? Why is this happening in the United States, more than any other country, right? Is it the access to guns? Cause that's, we know it's a contributing factor according to these people, why does the us have a higher percentage of these mass shootings occurred, uh, compared to other countries?

Why? And I think that's an interesting question. And I think it's an important question. I think it's something that we have to deal with head-on and I think as something that we have to take an educated non-emotional approach to answering. And so here's my thought on that. Okay. When, when I believe when things, so there's a good example.

I have this, that will kind of drive this point home for you. But so when, when it's something, as in the human consciousness, the youngian theory of the, um, of the greater consciousness, of, of the consciousness of humanity, that's all intertwined. Um, if you don't know anything about that theory, you should go look it up.

But basically the idea is that there's a collective unconscious is the actual term for it. Okay. Now, when something is happening in the universe, in the, in the, in the ether, in the ether, when something's happening in the ether, it, it goes across the consciousness of all the individuals who are intertwined with that individual.

Okay. So in this particular situation, it is a part of the United States of America is human collective unconscious that these shootings have been happening for a while. Now, now I posted a statistic today and what I said was on this day, CNN was founded 42 years. Since that date, that CNN was founded 42 years ago, school shootings have increased by 100% per decade for the last four decades.

So under the logic of the gun argument, it would be just, it would make just as much sense that we, I don't know, ban CNN as this to ban weapons. There's a correlation. And if you look deep enough into anything, you can always find some way to connect the strings. And that's what we see our politicians doing here is they find a string.

They pull on it. It's something that they've wanted to do all along, and they're utilizing this as a platform to do so. Okay. So if you look deep enough into any one of these, any specific piece of data, usually you can find some way to play mental gymnastics and find that to be the. So in this individual case, I think the reason that we have a higher percentage of these shootings in the United States is because of that collective unconscious, the same way that, um, you know, when it gets romanticized in these terrible, you know, really deeply distraught communities of like, you know, the, the deep dark corners of shadows of the internet, i, I would see it easily being romanticized people, watching the Columbine shootings and like, you know, all sorts of terrible things. Now there's the analogy that I'm speaking on that I think speaks to this the most is that there was a book that was written surrounding the difference in manifestations of mental health issues.

And so what this book kind of outlined was the trans movement, having something to do with a new manifestation of the same mental illnesses, because what. You know, and again, I'll say that I just talked about it. You can correlate a lot of things, but what this book outlines for you is how the percentage of young individuals who were having mental illnesses that were presenting themselves in the way of bulemia and anorexia had that same amount that went away like that the same statistical amount that did not, did no longer identify as having bulemia or anorexia, or had these, you know, actually psychological evaluations to do so.

The same percentage that were normally presenting their mental health issues as anorexia and bulimia. We're now presenting them in this, you know, transgender, gender dysphoria, whatever this book wanted to outline it as. Okay. So my point with that is it's a manifestation. It it's, it's the, you know, the collective unconscious way for a manifestation of these mental health issues.

Okay. So that's just that, that is a piece of the puzzle. I'm not saying that's why it happens most often the United States. I do think that there's a conversation to be had surrounding. Weapons right surrounding, you know, the amount of weapons that we have. However, there's definitely contradicting data points.

Like I believe it's Iceland, that's far more armed than we are that has far more guns per individual, per thousand and has far less gun crimes. Okay. So there's contradicting evidence for that, but I do think that there's absolutely something to that collective unconscious. And I do believe that with it being such a hot topic in the United States, it's always deemed to repeat itself because now the sick individuals who have the most rotted mental, uh, I don't know, state find, uh, now know the way that they can get the most attention out of, out of their anguish, and how they get their name on every news station. And it's gross and it's sick and it's horrible, but it's a manifestation of those mental health issues and the mental health issues that, you know, some politicians even went as far as to say, as he has no mental health issues really. He has no mental health issues because there's no way that you're able to do this horrific act, unless you have some type of horrific mental health issue.

Okay. Anyways, let's go back to the original point here. Okay. So the three parts of this conversation, the first one's going to be, this is a horrible tragedy, right? The three different perspectives on this shooting. The first one is this is a horrible tragedy. It's terrible. What happened? The police did everything right.

It's happenstance. There's nothing we could've done to improve this situation. Um, it's just terrible. The cops did everything. There's that's the main point. Okay. Now there was a video that came up where a teacher that was within the building came out and said that she believed the cops were in the building.

Okay. She believes that the cops were there at the moment. They were trying to help us. And she goes on to say that she sh you know, who's ever saying this, and she doesn't say this specifically, but basically she was outlining the fact that the cops. Now, when we go into the next part of the conversation, we'll realize that there is evidence to show that they were in there.

Just like that individual, who I was talking about earlier that border patrol agent, who said that they came in there, then they retreated. Then they went and sat in the parking lot for 55, 60 minutes, and then they decided, oh you know, we're still not going to go in until this border patrol agent that was off duty when against their orders and went and took him down.

Okay. So, but there is an individual who says that they were in there. It's a very, very low, very it's, uh, it's, uh, it doesn't have much substance to it, to me because there's already evidence showing that they went in there initially, but then they retreated pulled out according to this border patrol agent who was there at the time.

And then they went back in. So she could be very well referencing the, the initial part, where they went in there before, and then actually retreated because how would she know she was sitting in a, a, um, you know, a school room by herself with her kids right. In this chaos. How would she know exactly what's going on?

I'm not saying she's not telling the truth. When I am saying is they went in initially according to other accounts, then they retreated out. Then they went back in 55, 60 minutes later. So that doesn't disprove anything that we're talking about here, but it does give a talking point to the individuals who were saying that they did everything, nothing could have changed. And this is a horrific event and we shouldn't be pointing fingers and maybe we should be looking at policy reform and all these other things. Okay. Which isn't wrong. Isn't wrong. In some sense. And the fact that, you know, obviously we have to have a deeper conversation around why these issues are happening, but also if we have a police force, that's sitting there with rifles, get your ass in there and save the kids.

That's your job. That's what you're supposed to do. And we're going to outline an incredible story of a mother who did just that to save her children after being handcuffed by these police officers got out of the handcuffs. All right, we're going to talk on that. And then on the next portion of this, so we're going to talk on that mother because it's truly an incredible, you know, bad ass mama bear moment.

Really, truly one of the heroes of this day was this mother who jumped the fence after being handcuffed placed on the ground, went in there, got into the building and saved her children, walked out with them. Incredible. We'll, we'll, we'll discuss more of that detail in a minute here. Okay. So, so in other points of this though, is, is to me, is like, what, what would be frustrating is if you were a teacher, like think of a teacher, I feel.

Sending my children to, I have children, I have children. And when these things happen, right when the Oxford shooting happens a few months ago, um, it was much more near me than you validate Texas. Um, it hit really close to home. And so, um, it was really difficult then next day, it's like, it's concerning. I placed my child in the care of somebody else and I have no powerless.

And if something, if I'm in a room and something, shit like that's happening or going down, I know I can do something about it, but to place your children in a situation like that a day or two after, because again, that collective unconsciousness that young and collective unconsciousness around those days presents itself in copycats.

We've seen it when they came to the, when it came down to the Oxford shooting, the days proceeding that. All the schools in the local area shut down because there is so many threats, so many stupid ass, 16 year olds, 15 year olds posting on their Snapchat story that they were going to do the same thing.

Like all this gross, disgusting, this that was going on after of all these people threatening to be copycats in this situation. Um, so it was very uncomfortable as a parent to send your child to school. After this week, I've still feel like dropped my daughter off at school today still feels weird. Don't like it it's uncomfortable.

I don't like being out of the control of my child's safety, right? Especially when these things are happening in the, especially when the percentage likelihood that thinks things will repeat themselves around these dates come up again, right? The likelihood that that collective unconscious is coming together and some other super messed up mentally unhealthy individual who bought $8,700 worth of guns and ammo decides that he wants to put his name up on CNN's lights.

So th so they go into the situation and the, and the, just the likelihood, the collective unconsciousness is surrounding that, that action. And then they see the outcome. They see that these people, you know, their, their names everywhere, they're famous. And they're, they're infamous. And when you're in that sick, disgusting, horrific place, it almost becomes romanticized.

Like I said earlier. So as a parent, it's uncomfortable. Now, I also can't imagine being a teacher in this situation, can't imagine being a teacher in this situation. Imagine if there was a massive shooting where somebody went into an accountant's building, just accountants, right accountants. They went into accounting and accountants building, and they shot up 20 accountants.

And you're an accountant. The next day, you got to show up at your cubicle and go to work like a bunch of accountants. Didn't just get killed in an accountant's building. Yes. Now you expect our kids to go into that situation, but also to expect the teacher to also expect the teacher who is old enough to know what happened is old enough to be extremely scared of this situation.

And so I put myself in those shoes and I know the first thing I would want to do if I was a teacher the very next day, or if I was an accountant and there was all these shootings happening where accountants were dying in massive droves, what am I going to want to do? I'm going to want to protect myself, right?

I'm going to want to do everything I can to put myself out of harm's way. And to be able to defend myself if something like this happens and how do you do that? Because our police showed that even if you're got 20 guys with Bulletproof vests on the area, completely cordoned off in 35 rifles, then maybe you're still not going to go in.

So I need to be able to defend myself. And if I'm a teacher and you tell them. You can't carry a weapon in to defend yourself or your children that you feel responsible for tomorrow. When you go to work the day after a shooting like this happens, that's terrifying. That's like if you're a teacher, the first thing I would want to do, if I was a teacher is to carry in school, is to defend myself as to, I feel responsible for these children.

I feel like, you know, they're they, to spend more time with me as they do with their parents during the school year, why would I not feel responsible for these children? And I want to defend them and how can I do that? If you're going to strip that away from me and not allow me to carry a half of the firepower of somebody who's willing to come in here and commit harm on these children and harm on me, I want to carry a weapon and there should be able to defend myself.

Now, another thing that came from that interview was the fact that teachers in the local school area of the sheriff, I believe was. It might've been, I don't know, some type of law enforcement officer that they were interviewing again on real real news, no bullshit. Um, the individual that they were interviewing said that in 2018, there was legislation passed in their county that allowed for teachers to carry

how different, how different could this situation have turned out. There was one individual in that school who carried, who is near this shooting and was able to immediately respond and do something or even able to defend themselves when this coward walks into their room, intending on doing these children.

And the strip them of that, right? No school's zone sign that says gun-free zone has ever stopped a school. You think some guy who's in this state of mind, that's completely mentally unhealthy and unfit walks up to a school with his AR 15, his assault rifle sees the sign and goes, Aw, shit, can't go in here.

It's a gun-free zone. Not going to shoot these kids. No that's never happened. Ever, ever a gun-free zone sign has yet to have any statistical significance in stopping mass shootings. And it's the sign is just the physical part of it. That means the policies don't work. The policies, the laws that you implement are not going to stop somebody because if they're willing to walk into a school and shoot 19 children, if that's where their mental state.

Do you think, uh, making it difficult for them to purchase a firearm is going to prevent them from doing so, do you think that putting a gun-free zone sign up on your school or not allowing your to, is there ever been a teacher? Has there ever been a teacher that's committed a mass shooting ever point me to one, maybe I'm wrong.

Maybe it's happened. I don't know, but I've never heard of it if it has happened. So you're not going to allow that teacher to defend himself or herself. You're not going to allow them to defend their children that they feel responsible for. And you're going to put a sign out front and say, we got this right there.

Nobody's going to come in here. It's sick. It makes no sense. There's no logical explanation as to why any type of legislation would actually prevent this from happening now, the gun-free zone. Which has shown again, I talked about this on our last episode where we discussed this two episodes ago, where it manifests itself in Chicago and New York and LA, which have the strictest gun laws in the country, but you'll still have the highest murder rates per capita of almost anywhere in the entire world.

So we found that policy legislation doesn't seem to have an effect again, please tell me I'm wrong. Leave a comment, email me, whatever. Tell me I'm wrong. Show me it. Point me to a teacher that's ever went through with a mass shooting on their children. The children they're responsible for show me that.

Tell me I'm wrong. Maybe I am. I don't know, but I've never heard of it. Okay. So that leads us to the next portion of this, which is the idea that, okay, it's a horrific tragedy, right? And again, to highlight what we're going to discuss here, the first one that we just discussed was it's a horrible tragedy.

Everybody did. Which I don't know if I did very non biasly there. Um, but it's, it's difficult for me cause I, I just, it's hard for me to look through the evidence that's been proposed and, and, you know, I have the utmost respect, utmost respect for police officers, the utmost respect for border patrol agents, for anybody who in a daily basis puts themselves in harm's way for the, we are good if humanity, but I have that respect because you put yourself in harm's way for the better of humanity.

Now, if you take that position and there's 17 other men who would have walked in that building and done something, 'cause, you bet your ass. If my daughter's in that school and I'm driving there, you know, what I'm doing is I'm stopping at home. I'm grabbing everything. I need to go in there and I'm walking right past these cops.

And if they try and stop me, I'm going to tell them to shoot me in the. And I'm going to have somebody video recording it so that I can show that you are more likely to shoot the parent who was going to do something because you're being a coward than you were to go in that building and save those children.

And that's what it took. It took one man who decided that enough was enough, because could you imagine standing outside of that school and hearing those sounds

and just having to witness it, just having to sit there, wait on your chain of command. Fuck that. So the individual that did go in there was actually an off duty border patrol agent who did so against the wishes of the police that were there. So had this individual knock on against police orders and knock on in there.

How many more lives would have been. How many more children would not have seen their parents that night.

It's sickening to me that this happened. And they went down the way that it did. So there was documents that came up documents that were released recently that showed in the valley school district that they had active shooter training two months prior, they went over everything that they should have done, nothing, nothing in these documents said that they were supposed to wait outside for 90 minutes, not a single part of the documents.

You know what the documents did say the documents said that you go in there regardless of your own safety. The documents said whether you have. I don't know, 20 people standing outside with rifles, or there's one of you, you go in that building because that's your job. And if you don't want to do it, I completely understand most people are not cut out to walk in that building and do the things that you would need to do to take care of the situation.

I understand completely get it. Very few people are cut out to pull that trigger. Very few people are cut out to open that door against gunfire and go in and do something about this. Very few people are built that way. And if you're not stepped down, find a different job and let another individual who's willing, ready, and able to go in there to stop a situation like this from occurring.

Because if you take on the job of a police officer and you just think you're going to be doing traffic stops all day, you're in for a rude awakening. When you get a call like. You're in the wrong profession.

And again, I'm not knocking anybody who doesn't want to go into a building where there's somebody with a, a rifle shooting at you. I get it. You got kids, you got family, you got a life ahead of you too, but you're in the wrong job.

Now I have some people that are close to me that are pretty big influencers in the police space that I highly respect that has a differing opinion on this. And, um, and I get it and I hope we start hearing some information that's countering this, maybe everything was done. And that would be ideal to me.

Th th it's, it's terrible, terrible that this happened. And it's even more terrible that we get to, we have to sit here and wonder what could have been done, not even why, because why is a hard enough question in itself, but could there have been a different outcome if we had a different.

And that's even more difficult to wrestle with because why is one person, why did he do these things,

but why did the outcome not differ because of these large amounts of individuals, cop cars on cop cars, on cop cars, at least 20 men sitting out there with similar a weaponry as this individual had in there, just sitting out there and you know, where they were facing away from the damn school and you know who they were facing.

The parents, the parents who were screaming and crying and agony, and all they wanted to do is go inside. They were literally saying, I will go inside. I don't even need your weapon. I'm going in there. And they literally put a mom in handcuffs. And the only reason she got out of the handcuffs was because she knew three of the officers.

And they went up to the, whoever was in charge in the area and said, she's fine. She's not going to do anything. And then she tiptoed her way back and jumped a fence and got her damn two children like the bucking bad mama bear that she was to go do this because that's awesome. That's a hero. That's who I want wearing that vest.

That's who I want going in there with an AR that's the person who has the balls to take on that job and know what's at stake when you don't address it properly. And so I do want to read this article about this mom, because I just think that's probably one of the most incredible, incredible stories that I've ever heard.

This woman's screaming and crying and wants to save her children in this school.

She's yelling at these police officers go in there, go in there. Why are you not going in there enough to where these police put her in handcuffs on the ground? Like she's a criminal for wanting to save her child's life.

So here's the article. The article says cops handcuffed mom, amid Texas school shooting before she jumped fence, ran inside and saved her kids.

That's incredible. And these are the type of stories. These are the type of people that we want in these positions who are going to go in and save your child. Save my child in a case like this, not 19 men sitting out there with rifles, scared of going in, and again, maybe we'll find out I'm wrong.

And I hope that I am because that's, that's even more difficult to wrestle with then the why, because the why will never have an answer. There is a clear answer to this. There's a clear reason, or there's a clear a breakdown in the chain of command. There's a clear issue with the way that this was addressed and it could have been.

It's very difficult to look at this individual, to look at the shooter, to look at this coward and say, we could have done more. We could have prevented this. We could have stopped him. I didn't know his mom. I didn't know his dad. I didn't know what he was going through either did anybody else, but there was at least 20 cops sitting outside with rifles who could have gone in, and that is much more difficult to wrestle with as a parent than it is to go.

Why did this one sick person do these horrific things? Cause again, there will never be an answer to that. Never you'll never have a proper answer to that, but to go and to feel that you were let down by the police, the very people that you and trust your safety and your child's safety too, to know that they were the reason that your child's not coming home tonight.

So this article goes on. A mom of two students at Robb elementary school says she was handcuffed by officers as the shooter was still inside. Before she jumped a fence and ran into the school to safely, Richie's retrieve her children on Tuesday. Anjeli Rose Gomez, a mother of a second grader, and a third grader told the wall street journal.

She drove 40 miles to the Valdez school and was one of numerous parents begging and yelling at the police officers to enter sooner, to take out the 18 year old gunmen coward. Cause that's the only word that I'll use instead of his name. And this article is by the New York post. By the way, you can look up that topic that I just gave you.

Okay. It says after a few minutes, she said, or U S Marshall placed her in handcuffs. The mother who is trying to save her children, placed her in the hand. Stating that she was under arrest for intervening in an active investigation. According to the journal, it took almost an hour before Ramos. Sorry. It took almost an hour before the coward was killed by a specialized us border patrol tactical team authority said in that time he gunned down 19 school children and two teachers.

Now what you'll find in a lot of these articles that are maintaining the side that they want to be on, that is trying to maintain positivity surrounding what these police officers did is they will say that it was a U S border patrol tactical team. Not that it was an individual who was off duty, who went against the orders of the police and took this man down.

And again, it's early. Maybe again, I don't want to act in absolutes here. I'm just reading stuff, trying to sift through it and then come up with a good story. Like good idea of what actually happened. So hopefully again, maybe something comes out, but it's, this is the mother who got arrested and then saved her children.

So Gomez recognized a few Valdez police officers. You validate police officers and convince them to tell the marshals to remove the cuffs. Just as I said, she knew three of them once freed. She distanced herself from the crowd, jumped the school fence, ran inside the school building in, grabbed her two children, the three sprinted out of the school together.

She's got goosebumps.

That's incredible. Every parent ever. And this is a hero, I will say her name over and over again. Angela Rose Gomez is a hero.

Not only that she cause enough of a stir to get herself. Then she convinced these cops to have not to take the handcuffs off of her. And then she jumped the fence, got her children and saved them from potentially the horrific things that happened to these other children.

And I posted the video. I'm fairly positive. She was the one getting arrested in the video that I posted. Okay. If you don't follow me ever, it's at red pill revolt, you can see it. I posted it on Instagram. I posted it on Tik TOK. I posted it on truth, wherever you're at, you should be able to see it. Okay.

Now the article goes on to say that Gomez told the journal. She decided to charge the school herself. As officers waited outside the building, quote, unquote, doing nothing. They were just standing outside the fence. She said they weren't going in there or running anywhere. A spokesperson for the U S Marshall services denied her account, telling the journal that deputy marshals never cuffed anybody outside of the school.

We would never do that. Even though there's video evidence of it that I posted harrowing videos captured the heartbreaking wheels of parents who feared for their children's lives. As they watched police loiter outside the school building,

what are you doing? Get inside the building a person. How will them one video as another screamed go protect the kids. Some fathers hopped the fence, smashed in classroom windows and pulled their kids out. A first responder told the post,

the mom said she wasn't the only parent targeted by officers on the scene was she described as chaos. She said she saw police tackle a father to the ground and pepper spray. Another officer's tasered, a third debt taser. Uh, parent trying to make sure that their child is safe, tasered them tasered there, their father, the father who was going to run in there and save their children while they sat outside doing quote unquote, nothing.

She said, she saw a police officer's taser, pepper spray, and tackle another father to the ground. They didn't do that to the shooter, but they did that to us. Gomez told the journal, referring to herself and other parents. That's how I felt.

So who, who are you going to believe here? The individuals whose jobs are on the line, who not only their jobs, but their balls. They're a lot like their, their entire belief of who they are and who everybody thinks that they are is, is riding on this not being true is riding on the idea that they, oh, they did everything they should have done.

They did the all. This mom has nothing to lose here. She has no skin in the game besides the fact that her child was in there and she felt like nothing was being done. As she watched other parents get tackled pepper, sprayed, and tasered while they were trying to save their children.

So

the next thing I'm going to pull up here is an article by Yahoo news, which talks about exactly what I just post or what I was talking about there, which is the fact that a border patrol, a group of border patrol agents defied you valid the police orders to remain outside of the school. And they were the ones who took down the shooter.

Okay. So all of those articles that are saying it was a tactical team, we did, we, we knew what we were doing, did ya? Because they defied your orders to go in there and save these.

And this is from Yahoo news. Okay. We're not, we're not fringe yet here. This is Yahoo news. Okay. And the article of this or the T the, the, the headline of this article says border patrol agents defied you validate police orders to remain outside of school. All right. It says the border patrol agents who killed the school shooter and you validate Texas on Tuesday, entered the school on their own accord.

After local law enforcement requested that they hold back to senior federal law enforcement sources told NBC news on Friday, the officers from Bortech border patrol, his tactical unit arrived at Robb elementary school. In you validate from a location about 40 miles away. According to the New York times agents from U S immigration and customs enforcement, Homeland security investigations arrived around the same time.

The federal sources also told NBC local law enforcement asked the two teams. And then task HSI agents with pulling school children out of the classroom windows Bortech agents waited about 30 minutes, 30 minutes, and then decided to ignore local law enforcement's request to remain outside, entering the school and neutralizing the gunman that's who did this, how much longer would this have gone on how much longer if these guys, these heroes, the ones who actually did their jobs, not even their jobs, their border patrol, they don't need to be jumping into school windows.

They're border patrol. There was a SWAT team there,

and these are the individuals that took this man, this coward down, not even a man coward.

And they waited there for 30 minutes. And imagine how long those 30 minutes felt like, especially if you're somebody who believes what's going on is. They must've been, oh my God. I can not imagine the heart wrench again, with all of the sounds, all of the agony, all of the chaos, all the parents. And then you sit there and watch the parents get tasered and pepper sprayed,

30 minutes. They sat outside and then finally they decided screw that we're going in and we're saving these children because that's what men, good men, good women like that. Mom do. They act, they don't retreat. When an 18 year old coward with a rifle, same type of rifle. You have it sitting there, shooting at you.

You move forward because it could have been two to three police officers' lives who were lost compared to 19 children. And I'd say that's a pretty fair.

And again, I wouldn't wish that on anybody. Um, in, in being a police officer, who's going to be the first on scene and the school shooting is not for everybody and I get it. But if you're in that position right now, and you're w you're second guessing the fact that you would be the person to go in, maybe you should be second guessing your occupation, because it may not happen to you, but it's going to happen.

There was 29 school shootings between 2010 and 2020 alone, 29, 2 0.9 per year, three school shootings, 50 states, 6% chance that it's in your state. How many major counties, while you work in a major county, 6% chance that it happens in your state, do the math. I'm not going to do it, but there's a likelihood.

There's a likelihood that you will be first on scene. And are you going to go in because if not give up your badge, find a new job and that's okay. What's not okay, is sitting outside of a school for 90 minutes. While you hear gunshots go off 50 feet from you and know that it's in a classroom full of children, and you're sitting outside doing nothing with a rifle in your hands.

This article goes on to say local law enforcement asked two teams to wait and then task HSI agents with pulling school children out of classroom windows. Bortech agents waited about 30 minutes and then decided to ignore local law enforcement's requests to remain outside, entering the school and neutralizing the gunman.

One of the Bortech agents sustained a graze wound to the head before killing the shooter 19 students and two teachers at Robb elementary school and the deadliest shooting since 2012 shooting at Sandy hook elementary school officials identified the gunman as insert cowards name.

An 18 year old resident of the valley. Local officers waited too long to respond, to answer the school and respond to the shooter, Texas department of public safety director. Steven McGraw told reporters at the press conference on Friday, Macross said that the on-scene commander at the time of the shooting, the police chief, Peter Aaron Datto believes that the gunman had barricaded himself without additional threat, without additional threat to children at the school.

And that there was time to bring in more officers and equipment for a tactical breach from the benefit of hindsight where I'm sitting now, of course it was not the right decision. It was the wrong decision period. There's no excuse for that. McGraw said,

there's your answer. They just told you we should've went in sooner. There's no argument on that. They just said it. K from the benefit of hindsight, it's the wrong decision.

Okay. You can't argue that that was from their mouth. Nobody else's are that's. That's what they said. Okay. They know they should have done something differently. At least this one individual is saying that, okay, now, something even more interesting, which we'll get to in a second, I'll finish up this article with you, but there's something about that police chief that comes up in the following days, two days after we'll find out that he starts to ghost ghost followup investigators from other organizations who are trying to question this around him, and then even more interesting things happen right after that.

All right. But before we do that again, I need you to subscribe. I need you to leave a five star review. This is the red pill revolution podcast, wherever you're at right now. Go ahead and subscribe. Find it, leave a five-star review. I appreciate it so much also. There's only one way that you can support this podcast.

And it's, by going to the website, red pill, revolution dot C o.com is for losers red pill, revolution.co, and you can actually get yourself. Um, so I was trying to find a way to monetize without doing, you know, me, undies ads, kind of weird. I dunno, maybe it's just kind of weird. So no third-party ads here.

The only thing, the only way that you can support this podcast is by going to our website and donating, or by going to the link on our website, red pill, revolution.com, clicking the link and seeing, um, and finding yourself some life insurance is directly with me. No third parties, red Poe revolution.co. I found myself a $63 policy for $2 million.

Okay. No third parties. You go directly through me. You'll see red pill revolution right on the page there. Um, it's my license that you're under no third parties, like I said. So that's the only way that you can support this podcast. Thank you so much for considering it.

All right now, what we're going to go over is the police chief. Okay. The, you validate district police chief was gone for two days and then had a closed door ceremony. Okay. So let me read this. And again, this is from real news, no bullshit. It says breaking you valley a school district police chief, who was seen commander made the decisions that they shouldn't have gone in.

He was the decision maker at the school shooting was sworn in as the city council, as a city council member behind closed doors yesterday, it says Pete Aaron Datto, the valley school district police chief was sworn in as a city council member a week after a mass shooting left 21 dad and many more injured.

The chief who also served as the scene command around the shooting was sworn in behind closed doors. You validate mayor. Don McLaughlin said out of respect for the families who buried their children today and who are planning to bury their children in the next few days, no ceremony was held earlier.

Last week, our in data was elected to the city council. The mayor added that Aaron data was duly elected and that there was nothing in the city charter election code or Texas constitution that prohibits him from taking the oath of office. To our knowledge, we are currently not aware of any investigation of Mr.

Randazzo. The new news comes as Aaron Datto has not responded to investigators with Texas DPS and a statement on Tuesday. DPS said that the chief has not responded to a request for follow-up interviews with the Texas Rangers who are investigating the massacre. According to the officers we've interviewed Aaron Datto was the one who called on officers to stand down and wait for a tactical team before going into the school.

So this man not only ghosts, the Texas ranger.

They made some movies about the Texas Rangers. If you haven't seen them, they're good movies, Texas Rangers are crazy. At least they were crazy ghost. The Texas Rangers who were doing the followup investigation into the shooting for two full days after he's the chief commander. If you didn't do anything wrong, why are you hiding?

And also, it probably doesn't feel very good right now. If you're the parent, knowing the man who made the decision to not go in there and save your children is now city council member a week after the shooting, after everybody knew what he did after they already came out and said, what he did was wrong.

He gets a promotion and leave without a promotion, but he also gets this, this other position of power after horrific, like literally the worst thing that I can imagine. And again, from an empathetic perspective, he made a wrong decision and maybe that's. And we'll get to more crazier stuff here coming soon.

Trust me. Um, but for right now, let's call it what it was. It was a bad decision. It was a bad tactical decision. I would say. I'm probably not taking that city council member position. I'm probably getting out of the public eye as much as possible. I don't know. It seems weird to me, but then to ghost the Texas Rangers seems even more bizarre for two full days after this, this happens.

It seems like you would want to cooperate to the utmost. If you were that individual and how horrified you would have to be for the situation that occurred, knowing full well that you did everything in your power to stop it, or maybe you're questioning that. And that's why you go hide for two full days.

I don't know. Okay. So this is where it's going to get fun. All right. It's a good time to be a conspiracy theorist as my man, Joe Rogan with. It's a good time to be a conspiracy theorist. Cause you know, you got a lot of fucking ambient. There's a lot of ammo. It's a good time to be conspiracy theorists.

Cause you got a lot of ammo. All right. So now I will preface this. This is not my opinion. This is the opinion of a small fringe, minority of the internet, who should not be thinking these thoughts, what they're thinking them. So I'm going to talk about it. All right. So this is a horrific thing to have to think of.

Okay. This is a horrific path to go down and it speaks to where our country is as a whole that we have such a, I don't know, maybe I'm caught up in some weird algorithms. Maybe I'm in some weird echo chamber. I don't know. I try to stay away from echo chain. I try to get out there. I don't know. Maybe I am.

I don't know, but it seems to me like these types of narrative questionings are becoming far more. Far more common than in 2012 when the Sandy hook shooting happened. Because if you said something about that, then everybody looked at you. Like you were crazy, everybody. It was not a mainstream thought to think that, okay.

So this is a horrible thing to have to think of. It's a horrible thing to have, to even try to talk yourself out of thinking. Okay. But there has been events that have happened. If you recall Ted Cruz, who was questioning the director of the FBI, if I recall correctly, or somebody in that position who was in front of Congress being questioned on behalf of the FBI surrounding January 6th, saying that if you recall this conversation, I can't answer that question.

Was there an FBI agent who incited the January 6th situation? I can't answer that question. Was there any FBI agents. During the time of January 6th. I can't answer that question. Okay. So let's get something with a conversation about what he presented, which was the idea of a false flag. Okay. Now again, I don't think this is the right opinion.

I'm not saying I believe this. I'm not saying that at all, but there's definitely some weird things that have gone on that make you question narratives. Okay. And the fact that this is spilling into the mainstream, speaks to where we are as a culture. And this is horrific. And again, I'm not saying that, you know, when we went back to like the sh situation, that situation, there was people saying it doesn't exist.

These people weren't real. This never happened. Okay. Now I don't think it has to be that outrageous of a conversation. It doesn't have to be that outrageous at all. Think about it like this. You have an 18 year old who's in mental anguish whose mom's on math. Who's sick and. And he finds his own little echo chambers online.

He goes to rata and he goes to a four channel and he goes to whatever place you go to when you're sick in the head. And finds other people who are sick in that. Okay. Because if you think we already know the FBI knew of this individual, this coward, we already knew that we already know that they knew of him prior to this, that he was potentially making these threats.

We already know that. So we already know that they have software at all times that always identify as anybody who does anything like this. We already know that we already know if they talk about that online. Yeah. Probably getting flagged and somebody knows about you. Okay. So my point is that it doesn't take strapping you down within a leather chair and sitting in front of a TV, though.

It has a swirly little thing in the middle to get you to do something like this. What it could be is two individuals, a part of an organization who has a vested interest in moving towards the politicization of this conversation that convinces somebody who would, may have never done this in the first place.

And they do that by, I don't know. Hey buddy. Yeah. Yeah. My mom's on meth too. Isn't that? Yeah. Yeah. It's all right, dude. It's all good. You know, mom's on math. That's all right. You know, we got to take our anger out on the world though, man, you know, they go play some call of duty. You know, I'm not saying that has anything to do with it.

They go play some call of duty. Oh, check out this rifle, man. Watch this clip on it. This is pretty cool. You've been saving your money. Haven't you, man? Why don't you buy this one? This is cool. Oh. And get this magazine with it. And so it's these planning of seeds. It doesn't take this brainwashing television.

It takes one to three people. According to some sources, he was speaking to some girl in Germany, his girlfriend, or some girl that he had an interest in, in Germany that he was talking to. And so all it takes is somebody like that. We've seen it where the people have been tried for convincing other people to commit suicide or commit atrocious acts.

Okay, so it doesn't take a swirly TV sitting in front of you for you to defer, to convince somebody. It takes 2, 3, 4 accounts on Reddit, finding people who are already having these conversations and are mentally unhealthy, and then putting them in, giving them every step and every thought that they need, because they're agreeable because they're easy to convince because they're 18 stupid, their mom's on math and they have nothing good going on in their life.

And it takes a couple of little seeds that you can plant to get them to do it. Oh, Hey, I know somebody at that school, maybe we'll unlock the door for six minutes at this exact time. Not saying that was the case, but I'm saying that there's a situation that could present itself in some movie that could present itself this way.

All right. So that's the situation. It doesn't take a swirly TV. It doesn't take strapping and down to leather chair, it takes 2, 3, 4 accounts on Reddit to find one individual who's talking about these things and then to put them in the right position. Okay. So it's not that crazy of an idea in, in the reason that we're talking about these things right now is because there's been more conversations coming out.

There's been CIA documents like operation Northwoods, where our CIA, our own CIA presented the document that was approved by the joint chiefs of staff that said that we can attack college students. It says real or fake so that they were willing to kill college students in have people dress up as Cubans in order to try and convince the American people to go to war with Cuba.

This is on paper, operation, Northwoods, CIA reading room. Go find it right now, wrote a paper on it. Okay. This is a real thing. Okay. False flags have been presented in the past. Okay. Presented operation north was, is one of them where they actually talked about potentially. College-age students to convince the United States to go to war with Cuba.

Okay. Now, another interesting conversation surrounding this is the idea that Joe Biden has come out now and said that he wants to demolish the school two days after the shooting happened, he wants to demolish the school level. It, he said he doesn't want these kids to have to go through the anguish, which again is a logical thought in some ways it's like, yeah, I wouldn't want to go back to that school either.

If I'm a parent, I'm absolutely pulling my child out of that school. They're not going back there and I'm probably leaving that county. So I never have to deal with those cops again.

But Joe, Biden's talking about demolishing the school, the other school ship. Now I know Oxford, Oxford school still standing there. Nobody's talking about demolishing it, nobody. And you know what? Oxford was, Oxford was a individual, a young kid who did it to his own school. And I think that's an interesting conversation to have to there's.

You see Columbine, Columbine, all of these different school shootings, where somebody was at the school, they went to the school. They have a reason that they feel like this hatred for that place, right? These people, they did this to me, whatever that thought is, the horrific thought, right? Whatever that is, there's a reason they go into their own school and they do these things for somebody that randomly drive a truck that wasn't there as with $89,000 worth of weaponry to so happen, to crash right next to the school, to go to the back door at the exact time that it was opened in a school that has, if you don't know anything about elementary school security, it's pretty damn good.

Like there's pin pads. You got to get buzzed in. They bring it back to the front desk lady. She goes, hello. And you go, hi, I'm here to pick up so-and-so and then they see the picture of you. They know it's you, they know you're a parent. This is not the seventies, right? There's li there's see things that have been put in place for this not to occur.

And the fact that the back door happened to be open for a short minute period of time during this time is weird. Okay. Now I think it's important to discuss the fact that again, I don't think any of this, not a bit. All right. I'm just discussing with some people are saying online, the small fringe minority of people.

All right. So the other school that was demolished immediately following not immediately. It was four years after was Sandy hook. Weird, weird coincidence. Okay. Now also what I'm saying about that, if I go back and take a step back again to that, where I forgot where I was going with, that was the fact that what type of individual goes into a random elementary school.

You have nothing you, where is your rage being orient? Unless you're literally just like cloud chasing to be the villain of the century. Why would you go do this in that school? It's not your school. He didn't even go to school. He was out, why are you going into an elementary school and doing these things?

It makes no sense. And it was the same thing as Sandy hook made. No sense. Why, what is the motive? What is the reason that you go into that school? Why it makes no sense when you have something like Columbine happen when you have something like Oxford happened, there's the writing was on the wall, right?

There's the bullying, there's the, this there's the, that, there's the, you know, all of the, whatever you want to call it, this makes no sense at all. Makes no sense to me. No sense.

So now what I also think is interesting is the fact that this shooting happened a day before. And maybe we'll end on this topic. We'll lighten things up a little bit in the minute. Um, but back to being talking about a serious tragedy, um, this, this happened to happen the day before the Johnny Depp trial adjourned the day before it adjourned.

I think it'd be interesting if you put up like a calendar right on your wall. And every time there was a major celebrity event and the major political event and something horrific that happens, a war breaks out, a pandemic breaks out, you know, you list it all on the calendar, right? Like will Smith slaps the shit out of host of Oscars, a war breaks out.

Then the next one would be, uh, um, Johnny Depp. Sue's Amber heard for the most ridiculous clown trial you've ever seen and now school shootings. So if you like overlay all these major catastrophic, both celebrity. And horrific and geopolitical events that happened. What would that calendar look like? I don't know.

Be an interesting calendar, be an interesting calendar. So on the backs of that, that will conclude my conversation about you validate Texas, but we will continue on about Amber heard. If you didn't hear Amber heard, oh, lost her trial against Johnny Depp. Johnny Depp won the trial for the defamation lawsuit and will be awarded a sum of $350,000.

Now the reason there was a 350,000 is originally Johnny Depp sued Amber herd for 50 million, and then she counter sued for a hundred million and then he won the 50 million case. But none of it mattered because there was a $350,000 cap for the state. I don't know. If you watch the event, you watched it unfold.

There's a many, many people, almost everybody believes that Amber herb was crazy and she was making all of this up. All of it, you watch the trial. She seemed to be in character. She seemed to be, you know, um, losing her place in stories. There was a lot of things that she said that happened, that we're proved wrong, according to the lawyers and the legal counsel of Johnny Depp and according to the jury.

So $350,000 that Amber heard well now, oh, Johnny, that in a crazy weird trial that is now diverting us from our original serious conversation, which is exactly the point that I was trying to make before is if you can divert the conversation when something horrific like this happens. And, and, and also it's interesting to know what is going on during that calendar timeframe, where there was Johnny Depp.

Amber heard you validate Taxus world economics. The world economic forum summit in Davos, just so happened to be happening during all of this. That's what our next episode was. I'm sitting on a bunch of clips from Davos and the world economic forum summit right now, bill gates saying all sorts of crazy shit, all of this crazy stuff that's going on in Davos right now.

And our conversation's been diverted effectively in rightfully when something horrific like this happens, right? I'm not claiming to know anything other than what you guys know. I think it's horrific. It's a tragedy. It's terrible that it happened. I feel so horrifically bad for these parents. I can't imagine being in your position.

I can't even put it into words.

It's weird to me that all of these things tend to happen in, you know, blocks, but I dunno. So anyways, our next episode will be on the world economics. And on Davos, unless some crazy shit happens between now and then that I feel the need to jump on here and do another podcast with and push that out. But it has been concluded.

The Amber heard. So let's watch out for the next crazy celebrity political situation. Maybe Jennifer Lawrence is gonna, I don't know, uh, do an MMA fight against mark Walberg. What is the more outrageous thing than the last will Smith slapping him and Amber heard and Johnny Depp's trial? I don't know, but in the meantime, thank you guys so much for listening.

I appreciate you so much. Go ahead and hit that subscribe button, leave a five-star review. If you don't think that this was a five-star podcast. That's okay. I love feedback. Okay. Leave me a comment. Send me a message. Email me Austin. At red pill, revolution.co.com is for losers. You can also go to red pill, revolution.co dot, almost messed that up.

Red pill, revolution dot C O right now. And you can sign up to be a subscriber for donations. That is one of the only ways that you can help support me besides going ahead and checking out the life insurance quotes on the website, click the link. Like I said, $2 million, $63 a month. That's crazy. I don't know.

Maybe my wife is going to kill me and get in a really nice lump sum. According to a bunch of Netflix documentaries that happens quite often. Um, but $2 million gives me the peace of mind to know that no matter what happens to me, my family is taken care of. Um, I am not leaving my situ my kids, my wife, in a situation where they're left out in the dust, because something happens to me.

Okay. Red pill, revolution.com. Cover your assets, support the show, um, you know, protect yourself, protect your family. That's all it takes. All right. So, um, I have been going. On Tik TOK during these shows. So go ahead and follow me on Tik TOK at red pill revolt, you can see the show live. We're going to start doing that every week.

Um, so I hope you guys are enjoying it. I'm going to stick around after this for a few minutes and run through your comments. Uh, maybe go through some questions you guys have. Um, and I don't know, chat for a little bit. So, um, as of right now, that concludes our podcast. Thank you so much for listening. I appreciate you so much and welcome to the revolution.

Have a great day.

In this episode of Red Pill Revolution, we discuss the unbelievable stories of 5 Medal of Honor recipients. Dakota Meyer, Kyle Carpenter, Salvatore Giunta, John Chapman; All Heros with their own incredible stories that we dive into and discuss. Listen in and pay homage to these remarkable men.

Subscribe and leave a 5-star review today!

Protect your family and support the Red Pill Revolution Podcast with Affordable Life Insurance. This is attached to my license and not a third-party ad!

Go to https://agents.ethoslife.com/invite/3504a now!

Currently available in AZ, MI, MO, LA, NC, OH, IN, TN, WV

Email [email protected] if you would like to sign up in a different state

Leave a donation, sign up for our weekly podcast companion newsletter, and follow along with all things Red Pill Revolution by going to our new website: https://redpillrevolution.co

Full Transcription:

In this episode of Red Pill Revolution, we discuss the recent massacre of 18 children by an 18-year-old in Texas. We talk about what happened, what the local police had to say about it as well as the school super intendant; then we see our leaderships reaction including Joe Biden and Kamala Harris as they attempt to politically profit off of this horrific tragedy. 

Subscribe and leave a 5-star review today!

----more----

Protect your family and support the Red Pill Revolution Podcast with Affordable Life Insurance. This is attached to my license and not a third-party ad!

Go to https://agents.ethoslife.com/invite/3504a now!

Currently available in AZ, MI, MO, LA, NC, OH, IN, TN, WV

Email [email protected] if you would like to sign up in a different state ----more----

Leave a donation, sign up for our weekly podcast companion newsletter, and follow along with all things Red Pill Revolution by going to our new website: https://redpillrevolution.co

Full Transcription:

Hello, and welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams. Thank you so much for listening today. I appreciate. From the bottom of my heart in the heart, the same heart that you are going to hear today, very broken and shattered surrounding some recent events that have happened in Texas. Today's going to be a little bit different than most episodes.

Uh, we're going to focus just on this brief topic here. Um, it's, you know, something, I just felt the need to kind of just jump on here and talk with you guys about, talk about some of the current events that are coming out of this. Who's speaking. What they're saying? Uh, all of it. So make sure you stick around for the full thing again, I appreciate it so much.

Um, don't want to step on this situation too much. So as always go ahead and subscribe hit that five-star review button. Uh, that's all I got for now, but I would like to jump into this. So if you don't know, you haven't heard yet, it happened. Uh, I guess it was yesterday, today, really? Um, Tuesday, May 24th.

There was a. In Texas, uh, by an 18 year old individual whose name I will not use, I refuse to use. And it ended up, uh, I guess at this point there's been 18 children who have died as a result and one teacher, we don't have all of the details so far. Uh, but we'll go ahead and let's watch this opening clip that discusses what actually happened, who was involved.

Uh, and, and the little bit of information that we know at this point. So here we.

All right. There's our intro. A little bit more information about this. They say 14. It has now been confirmed at 18, at least from a little bit more updated sources. Uh, I believe that the teacher also has died at this point, as well as potentially one police officer. I believe I heard that somewhere, but not confirmed on my end.

Uh, but we do know that at least 18 children have lost their lives to this terrible, terrible tragedy. And one that, as they've explained has been, you know, a topic of discussion quite frequently over the last decade or so. And it's quite terrifying. Um, I have children and as they mentioned, this was second to fifth grade or six, second to fourth grade, I believe, which they said was six year olds.

That's not the case generally in second grade. Second grade is usually going to be seven or eight year olds, but the factor means. This is terrifying. This is horrible. This is terrifying. Um, this is a sickening thing for any individual to do, as we saw in multiple cases that Jay just presented there. Um, the individual who did so also did not only just do it to the children, they did it to, uh, to their own family prior to going out there now, from what they had mentioned there, the individual had a handgun.

Potentially had a rifle from some of the other conversations that we've seen. And according to the Sheriff's clip, which we will see next also had some form of a vest that he had on to protect himself from the ensuing chaos. He knew he was getting himself into. So as I was saying, this is horrible. This is terrible.

I think that we saw it there. You know, the immediate cries that you'll see in a lot of these situations is to immediately jump to like policy decisions. And, and I think. That's not always the right decision. I think that sometimes terrible things happen and we have to maybe let the parents let the school grieve a little bit before we start to look at what these politicians can do to pass legislations that may or may not prevent this thing in the future.

Uh, but let's go ahead and watch that sheriff clip. Let's see what he has to say about it. It's a, it's a brief one. Um, so let's, let's go ahead and watch.

Again, briefly, as of now, we're still working on this active investigation. Uh, once we're able to provide information to the families, we will do so first and foremost, obviously our Prairie's is to get information to our families. Um, and, and give them some information. So please bear with us in regards to that.

Secondly, once we do get some information that we can release to the public, we will be doing that. So please know, once we do get some information, we will share that with you and call another press conference. Um, let me assure you, the intruder is deceased and we are not actively looking for another individual or any other suspects in this case.

Uh, we definitely ask you all to keep the family, the families that are involved in your prayers. It's so much

here to provide a statement. I not take any questions is our superintendent, Dr. Howell heroine. Good evening. This was a tragic slips of bent today. And my, my heart was broke today. Our hearts and thoughts and prayers are with all our families as we go through the, this day and days to come a few announcements that we'd need to make.

Beginning tomorrow at 10:00 AM. We will have grief counseling and support at the civic center for our students, our staff, community members, anybody that needs to come at that time. And we may be there more than one day. Maybe there's several days. Our Rob staff will meet at 8:00 AM at, uh, at the civic center as well will begin with visiting with them.

And, uh, seeing what those needs are, school will be closed. We, the school. Uh, we will have no school tomorrow or Thursday. All activities are canceled throughout the district. I know graduation is on people's mind. We will come out with a notice on that at a later time, all the staff members do, they will report to their campuses, uh, other than Rob campus, which will come to the, uh, the civic center.

Again, my heart was broken today. We're a small committee. And we'll we'll need your prayers to get us through this. Thank you

again, this is a tragic event in our community. We are very sorry that we cannot provide you more information, but greatly appreciate your patience and understanding during this very difficult time, we ask that you pray for all of the families affected. Thank you.

Okay. So there's the direct Sheriff's, uh, statement on that. Also the superintendent of the school spoke on it. One thing that I'm happy to hear is that this sick, disgusting human garbage is dead. Although I don't think that. You know, full justice in this situation. I mean, what type of coward, what type of coward do you have to be to not only shoot your own grandmother, but then to go find a bunch of defenseless children to take out your, whatever is going on in your head.

Like, jeez, what, what in the world? Like w what, what do you have to be going through to even consider this type of. I mean, what type of sickness do you have to have in your head? In, in there's some clips out there that I was watching. I don't know if I have them on here. I don't believe I do, but there was a part of Tucker Carlson's, uh, clips, which I have a brief portion of that we're not going to watch the full thing of, but it also goes into an interview with his classmates who his classmate was seeing is where he was kind of a, a funny character.

But, um, he was. Basically just saying that, you know, this guy didn't raise any flags to him. He was in class with them two years ago in gym and he wasn't sketchy quote unquote, and you just never know. Right. You never know what somebody is going through. You never know what somebody is capable of. And I think that's, you know, a better case for being able to defend yourself in these types of situations.

Not saying that there's anything that really anybody could have done here to prevent this. But I think, you know what we're going to see when we watch these clips that are coming up is the immediate, you know, immediate, emotional, not even emotional, I guess, emotionless reactions by our leadership in this country and trying to use this platform to ask for policy changes that they've tried to push over and over and over again about gun control and.

You know, speaking of what type of cower does it take to, to do these things? What type of coward does it take to try to take advantage of these situations? Right? Like if, if you're the, the president of the United States and this happens in your country, if you're that superintendent, gosh, I don't know how he even stands up there and completes a full sentence.

I, you know, see you the principal of my daughter's school. Every day when I walk in and I couldn't imagine in, in he sees the faces of our children every day. Now the superintendent is a little bit more removed from that, but gosh, what a horrible situation in general and, and how terrible, uh, it must feel to be anybody involved in this school, anybody and any student who saw it, heard it, uh, a teacher or a parent who, who.

You know, actively part of this, um, situation, you know, that that even has to have an ex a conversation with her. Tonight's who were close to this and, and heard these sounds. And I got an email from my child's teacher who came out and said that, you know, this is a horrific situation. And she's so sad to hear these things.

And, you know, in, in some way, shape or form, we need to have a conversation with our kids. Now, I don't know how I feel about that. You know, I don't know if we need to, what is that going to do? If you have a child who is in this grade, in this. You know, a 7, 8, 9 year old them being afraid of the world and afraid of going to school in this, in this type of scenario, how many schools are out there where this doesn't ever happen?

In what percentage likelihood is it to happen in, in what mass horrific reality or, or what a massive like horrific, uh, conversation. If every parent had this conversation with her. At that age, I just don't think it's very appropriate. But, um, yeah, this is, this is tough, man. This is, this is so sad. And to know that there's so many parents out there tonight who just won't be talking in their, uh, you know, their child, their baby, who they raised and who they love.

And that's so sad. And so. Uh, let's, let's go ahead and see here. This is, there's some deeper seated problems that we'll see in, you know, and there, there was a, the saying goes, never let a great tragedy go without, you know, what is it taking advantage of a great tragedy. There's some quote around politics and I can't exactly pull it right now in the, in the frame of mind after hearing about this, you know, an hour or two ago, but a.

You know, taking advantage of these tragedies is exactly what we see our poor leadership do in this situation. And it's horrible. There's no reason for it. You know, the, the, let the parents grieve, stop trying to push policies in the, in the midst of tragedy for the sake of, you know, it's like if you were a life insurance agent and you know, which, you know, we'll get to that in a second, but if you were a life insurance agent, let's take that.

And these kids died and all of a sudden you're running advertisements towards parents saying, Hey, get life insurance on your child. Do they, they're going to die. Just like these children did potentially, right. We need to prevent you from being in hardship if this happens or whatever it is that you can insert there.

It's gross. It's disgusting. Any business that would take advantage of this to try and push their. Profits, which is exactly what their political profits are that they're trying to push our leadership here is trying to push it political profit. They're trying to profit off of this in some way, shape or form, right?

In, in, in this case, it's in this way, shape or form of control, right? And they want to use lists platform. They want to immediately jump to the idea. We should be banning guns and we should be banning, uh, assault rifles, and, you know, whatever it is. Um, we're going to see that here. And, and, and to me, it's just gross.

Any industry that would utilize this platform to try to profit in any way, shape or form, whether it's attention, whether it's, uh, direct profits, like the life insurance example. Whether it's, uh, political profits, whether it's attention profits, you know, there's so many different ways to profit. And in this situation, our political leadership is trying to profit off of this situation by immediately jumping to specific policy changes in, in, in calling for them.

So we'll see that here. Let's go ahead and watch Camila Harris, give her speech, then we'll jump to the Biden speech. Then we'll jump to. Uh, Tucker Carlson had to say, which he basically called them out prior to them, even having these conversations, knowing they were going to utilize this platform for their political profit.

Uh, so here is Kamala Harris. We need to go now to Washington. We understand vice-president Harris plans to address the shooting, the tragedy, and you volley at Robb elementary school. Let's go ahead and listen to what she has. Please sit everyone. Thank you. Thank you. What a, what an incredible room. And, um, Judy Chu, thank you for that introduction and for your leadership on so many levels.

Um, tonight's a rough night. Um, we planned for a great celebration, but I'm sure most of you have heard the tragic news. Um, About what has happened in Texas. So I had prepared comments about tonight, which I will speak, but I just first want to begin by saying a few words about the tragedy that occurred today, um, in you valley, Texas.

Um, as many of, you know, the reports are that, uh, it was a mass shooting at an elementary school. And, um, the preliminary reports are that 14 children have been killed. Um, and the details are still coming in. And of course the president and I are monitoring the situation closely. So while we don't know all the details yet, uh, we do know that there are parents who have lost children, um, families that have lost children and their loved ones, of course, and many others who may have been injured.

So I would normally say in a moment like this, we would all say naturally that our hearts break, but our hearts keep getting broken.

You know, I think so many, there's so many elected leaders in this room. You know what I'm talking about? Every time a tragedy like this happens, our hearts break and our broken hearts are nothing compared to the broken hearts of those fans. And yet it keeps happening. So I think we all know and have said many times with each other enough is enough.

Enough is enough as a nation. We have to have the courage to take  action and understand the next. Between what makes for reasonable and sensible public policy to ensure something like this never happens again. So the president will speak more about this later. Um, but for now I will just say to the people of you've already, um, please know that this is a room full of leaders who grieve with you.

And we are praying for you and we stand with you and it is difficult at a time like this to think about much else. But I do look around this room and I know who is here. And I know this is a room full of American leaders who know and have the courage to take a stand. And so let us tonight, as we do every time we all get together.

Recommit ourselves to having the courage to take action. And so that does bring me to the leaders who are in this room and the leaders of apex. And again, I want to thank chairwoman Judy Chu for that kind introduction as a former member of K pack, um, I had the opportunity to see her leadership firsthand, and she is truly a national leader who leads.

The people of our country. And of course, I'm honored tonight to be with Congresswoman, Maryland, Strickland, apex board chair, Susan, Jen Davis, and all of the federal state and local elected officials who are here. Okay. That's enough. So you get the idea, the percentage of time that she talked about the grieving of these parents and what actually happened in this situation was so much.

Compared to the timeframe that she spoke about. Here's what we need to do is enact policy changes. And, you know, we all have the power. No, you don't. You do not have the power to stop this. No laws that you pass would stop this. There was a guy, fuck how long ago, months, a year, whatever it was, who ran over an entire group of people with a car, are you going to ban cars?

It makes no sense. You go to the UK where there's the access to guns is way low. There's just higher stabbing rates. These things happen. They have happened. They're going to continue to happen, regardless of whatever policies that you enact, regardless of whatever ego comes into your way. And even to then into this ego is probably even being.

Because I don't think it's ego for her to sit there and think that we need to enact these massive bands. Right. And she did not really say it, but we're going to watch the Joe Biden clip and he comes out and says it

it's, it's crazy to me that these people who are in these positions of power cannot even. Can not even stand in front of a group of people and knowing there's 13, eight, well, 18 parents out there today who are wanting to listen to a voice of reason in a position of power and, and hear something at least just grieve with them.

Don't stand on their backs and, and. Pallets ticks, push political agendas that, you know, you've been pushing for a while now. And, and, and know what law that you're going to pass is going to stop this. Look at Chicago, look at LA, look at wherever the largest percentage of murders are, are where there's the most strict gun laws in the country.

And you know, this. Kamala Harris, you know, this Joe Biden, you know that the only thing that you are going after while you're standing on the backs of these parents who are grieving over their children, is the political agenda on your mind for control to control the people, to take away any, any potential response they would ever have to totalitarianism.

And, and you step on their backs and in the worst moment you could ever possibly imagine and use their backs as a stepping stool to push your political agenda. You sick, gross people. How disgusting is that? Give it, give it a fucking day. At least maybe come out and say, I cannot imagine, like, alright, here's my thing.

Here's here off the cuff. Here's what I would say to these parents. I can not imagine being in your position. I can not imagine that the hardship and heartache that you must be going through today. And I hope that you never, that I never do have to be able to feel the difficulties that you're going through right now.

And there's nothing that I can say. And there's nothing that I can do to take that away from you. But I want you to know that there is a country. Of hundreds of millions of people who feel your grief with you today. And there are share the unbelievable heartbreak that you have. And many children who will go to sleep tonight without their friends tomorrow and brothers and sisters who will wake up without, without their siblings.

And we are so horrific. Sad right alongside of you. And there's nothing we can do. There's nothing we can say to make you feel better, but I want you to know that we're here for you, that we will do whatever we can to be there for you. And that over the next few weeks, we will be reaching out individually to speak with every one of you to let you know that.

Politicians that your president and your vice president cared deeply deeply about you, about your family and about your children.

That's what leadership says not. Hey, did you guys hear about Texas? Yeah. Well, there's some, there's this many children who. Here's how here's what I can do to prevent this in the future. And you all decided that you didn't want to pass these laws are the reason this happened. No, that's disgusting. That's gross.

Shut your mouth grieve with these parents. Or just shut up and let it, like, they don't need to hear you pushing political agendas right now. You definitely don't need to be like wagging your little gross finger Camila at the individuals who, who didn't pass your massive gun bans because of anything there's pre more preventions of mass shootings as a result of access to web.

Then there is these one-off little situations that we're seeing here that are, are again horrific, and you can't speak to the magnitude of agony that these parents must be going through. But the last thing you should be doing is pushing your political agenda for 60% of the conversation. While 10% of it goes out to our hearts with.

But we need to do this. You guys are wrong for not passing this and I am right, because I could have prevented this if you did what I said. And so let's hear what Biden has to say, and it's quite similar, but I haven't heard the whole thing. So we'll listen together.

Good evening fellow Americans.

I'd hoped when I became president, I would not have to do this again. Another massacre you valley, Texas, and elementary school. Beautiful. Innocent. Third fourth graders. And how many scores of little children witnessed what happened? See their friends die as if they're on a battlefield for God's sake.

I don't know whether the rest of their lives there's a lot. We don't know yet. There's a lot. We do know. The parents who will never see their child again, never have them jump in bed and cuddle with them.

Parents will never be the same to lose a child. It was like having a piece of your soul ripped.

there a hollowness in your chest, you feel like you're being sucked into it, never going to be able to get out suffocating.

It's never quite the same as the feeling shared by the siblings and the grandparents and the family members and the community. The thought behind scripture says. Joe. And I've talked about this in different contexts and other context, Lord is near to the brokenhearted and saves the crushed in spirit. So many crushed spirits.

So tonight I asked the nation to pray for them, give the parents and siblings. And the darkness I feel right now as a nation, we have to ask, when in God's name, are we going to stand up to the gun lobby? When in God's name? We do it. We all know in our gut needs to be done. This is the 343,448 days, 10 years since I stood up at a high school.

And Connecticut grade school and Connecticut or another government, Matt massacred, 26 people, including 21st graders at Sandy hook elementary school since then have been over 900 incidents gunfires reported on school grounds, Marjory Stoneman Douglas high school in Parkland, Florida, Santa Fe high school in Texas Oxford high school.

Let's goes on and on and on this grows wanting to include mass shootings at places like movie theaters, houses of worship. As we saw just 10 days ago to grocery store in Buffalo, New York, I am sick and tired of it. We have to act and don't tell me we can't have an impact on this card. I spent my career as a Senator and the vice-president working to pass common sense gun laws.

We can we'll prevent every tragedy, but we know they work and have positive impact. When we pass the assault weapons ban mass shootings went down when the law expired mass shootings tripled the idea that an 18 year old. Can walk into a gun store and buy two assault weapons. It's just wrong. What in God's name?

Do you need to solve it for except to kill someone there? Aren't running through the forest with Kevlar vests on for God's sake, it's just sick. And the gun manufacturers has spent two decades aggressively marketing assault weapons, which make them the most and largest profit. Wow. There's a lot to unpack there.

The first of which being schools are a gun-free zone, Joe, it's illegal to have a weapon on school grounds. It's literally one of the only mass protected areas that you can go to that as illegal to carry a weapon on. Didn't stop him dead.

It's it's crazy. And then he goes on to say, dear, aren't walking around with Kevlar vests. What a gross usage of, oh, how disgusting is that your statement? There's 18 parents out there right now who are grieving the loss of their children. Uh, in deeper agony than you were ever in with Bo who ended, whose children's lives were ended in such horrific fashions.

And you're talking about deer walking through a forest and a Kevlar vast

how disgusting, how gross. Right. And everybody wants to get in this conversation like, oh, everybody was saying with abortion, how, oh, if you ban abortion, people are just going to do it illegally. Might as well, make it healthy and safe. Where's that conversation. When it comes to guns, you're going to ban assault weapons.

You're going to ban assault rifles. People are just going to do it illegally. Right? The people who are going to do these types of things are absolutely going to find. It's a sickness. It's a sickness in your head to even have the capacity to do these things, to even fathom shooting your grandma and then going on, and then fucking driving to an elementary school and shooting 18 children.

That is not a gun problem. That is a mental health problem. That is a sickness in your brain that, that most people cannot even fathom the, the, the, ah, the, the, how horrible of a person you must be to potentially even do that. There's, there's something missing in your head. There's a switch that, that wa that was flipped that no other person can fathom going through.

And whether it's a gun, it's a knife, it's a truck like we saw months ago, or. They're going to find a way. And so let's address the root cause. It's not the guns, it's not the gun lie being manufacturers in this case, it's the sickness. It's the, it's the, the, the switch in your head that allows you to do such horrific things and what we'll see statistically, and almost like, I think it's 80% or larger.

It may even be higher than. Are on some type of SSRI, some type of antidepressive medication, something that's messing with your nervous system, that there there's a humanistic aspect that does not allow you to do these horrific things

and to completely eliminate the conversation of, of that being gone in these individuals. And, and, and, and to diminish that conversation down to a. Gun issue or a, a specific type of gun nonetheless, or the fact that you there's no deer in Kevlar vests walking across the forest. You, you fucking idiot. How disgusting, how gross for you to use this as your platform to push gun reform restrictions.

Right, because we all know what that leads to go to go to Brazil, go to, and I don't know if there's gun bands in Brazil, but I'm assuming that's probably crazier than go to go to any of these countries and find, find me the statistics that back up, the fact that if you mass, uh, take away, you know, you know, who did that?

You know, who do you know who took away guns? First was eight off. Was stolen was Landon. All of these people didn't allow their people to have that because that's the only form of control and no nobody's using, uh, it has an AR 15 for the purpose of going and shooting a deer. You're so stupid that you don't even know how hunting works.

Nobody's shooting a deer with an AR 15,

should it be that removed and not even that removed, he knows what he's doing. He's not playing on the individuals that actually know. How guns work or how hunting works, even he's playing on the emotional strings of individuals who are uninformed surrounding this topic. No, nobody buys an AR 15 to shoot a deer.

People buy an air 15 to protect their household Pritchard's to protect their family. And in many cases to protect their family from the opportunity of being taken over by a totalitarian government, it's the same reason. All of your soldiers carry an ARP. Or an M 16, the same reason it's to protect yourself.

And then to say that an 18 year old shouldn't be able to walk into a gun shop and buy a gun you're recruiting the same 18 year olds to go fight your wars. And probably Ukraine coming up soon as we saw him say in the conversation that he had on the border in Poland. So you're going to allow them to carry it because they fight your wars hunter.

Because you get to profit off of the backs of their blood. They're not going to take their M sixteens into a forest to shoot a deer in the Kevlar vests you dumb ass. It's not when they are 15 is four and 15 is a war. Gun is a self protection, personal protective. And literally it's a pistol with a, buttstock a longer barrel and an extended magazine.

In some cases in the same type of magazine you can get for any gun right now, I can go get my Glock and get a 30 round magazine for my Glock, just like what's in my era, 15, doesn't change a thing, but you're just trying to play on the emotional strings of families who are grieving to push your political agenda.

Let's watch a little bit more of this. If I can stand it.

I am sick and tired of it. We have to act and don't tell me we can't have an impact on this corner. I spent my career as a Dawn for God's sake, it's just sick. And the gun manufacturers has spent two decades aggressively marketing assault weapons, which make them the most and largest profit for God's sake.

We have to have the courage to stand up to the industry. Here's what else? I know. Most Americans support, common sense laws, common sense gun. I just got off a trip from Asia meeting with Asian leaders. And I learned this while I was on the aircraft. And what struck me on that 17 hour flight. What struck me was these kinds of mass shootings rarely happened anywhere else in the world.

Y they have mental health problems. They have domestic disputes in other countries. They have people who are lost, but these kinds of mass shootings never happened. The kind of frequency they happened in America. Why, why are we willing to live with this carnage? Why don't we keep letting this happen?

Where in God's name is our backbone to have the courage to deal with and stand up to the lobbies. Turn. This thing is action for every parent, for every citizen of this country, we have to make it clear to every elected official in this country. It's time to act

it's time for those who obstruct or delay. Or blocked the common sense gun laws. We need to let you know that we will not forget. We can do so much more. We have to do more our prayer tonight. Those parents

lying in bed and trying to figure out

will I be able to sleep again? What do I say to my other children? What happens to the more

and God bless the loss of innocent life on this sad day. May the Lord be near the broken heart and saved those crushed in spirit because they're going to need a lot of help. A lot of our pre. Okay. First of all, I don't know how many times I've heard Joe Biden mentioned God or the Bible references. Um, interesting that that comes up now, but I won't critique it.

It makes sense. However, what I will critique is the fact that two minutes and 47 or two minutes and 40 seconds of this clip was devoted to speaking to the. Was devoted to talking about grief was devoted to mentioning the topic, even that was a seven minute clip. The other five minutes of Joe Biden's speech was dedicated completely the policy reforms that he's been pushing for years surrounding gun control.

How does, how gross I'll say that over and over again. It's just, it's sickening to me that this is the conversation that we're having. And it's obviously easily called out by others because here is Tucker Carlos and mentioning the fact that this is exactly what they were going to do prior to the, either of these speeches coming out.

He knew this, and here's a clip of Tucker Carlson discussing it. Oh. That if the president uses the deaths of children to try to make himself more powerful, he really is a lonesome man unworthy of leading this country. He may rise above it and try to unite this country. In which case he will get praise from us and from every American, some are not doing that.

However, some have gone lower than you even imagined a Congressman called Rubin. Galago just tweeted this quote, just to be clear, F you Ted Cruz, you effing baby killer. Can you imagine, what do we think of Ted Cruz? He did not shoot anybody. It's a horrible thing. Nancy Pelosi, recent statements re released a statement saying this quote.

It is time for all in Congress to heed the will of the American people, enjoying it and enacting the house passed bi-partisan common sense, lifesaving legislation into law. Of course they jump at any opportunity, including the deaths of children to make partisan points. And then a character called Juliet Kam.

A former Obama administration official DHS said the shooting is proof. We need to get rid of immigration laws. She said that I'm seeing this a few hours. From an investigation standpoint, I'm going to do what the facts tell me now. So I've got demographics, first of all, an 80% Hispanic school district. So the most important thing for the federal government to do right now is to say there will be no immigration enforcement during this period in that.

Uh, area. It is, it has a large immigration population. You want parents with their kids. You don't want people hiding right now. And we need to make that clear ASAP because of the political issues in Texas. So a normal person, decent person stands in reverence and awe and deep sadness before a tragedy like this, a filthy person jumps in to figure out how can this make me more powerful?

Jeanine Pirro is the co-host of the five. She joins us tonight. Judge. Thanks so much for coming on. Um, you really do learn about people in the immediate aftermath of something like. Don't ya? Well, you know, what you just saw is really the epitome of the politicization of a tragedy. Some people are so ideologically rigid that they will use anything, anything to bootstrap their political ideology in this case, you know, to basically open the borders.

And that is a sad, disgusting commentary when the thing that, okay, that's enough of that. But you get the. How dare you. How dare you. Like I said, stand on the backs of these grieving parents and devote 80% of your speech on this topic to policy political agenda reform, including immigration. What a, what clown world do you live in?

Where that's an appropriate conversations surrounding what just happened now? I'm not even going to get into it. This. Some of the deeper, you know, rabbit holes that you can when these situations arise. But if you're in that zone, you know what I'm talking about? Um, you know, it, I'm sure these, these things obviously happen.

And this obviously is a horrific. I don't know, I won't even get into it, but in this case, it's, it's so sad. It's so horrible. And, and to see our politicians are not even our politicians, our president and our vice president, just rubbing, rubbing the nation's nose in, in, in specifically calling out Ted Cruz, calling him a baby murderer for what not pushing your totalitarian gun laws.

You know, the, the, the, the fundamental. Constitutional rights that we were given. It's all gross. It's all disgusting. And it, this whole thing makes me sad. It makes me sad to see our leadership's response to it. It makes me, like I said, it's just disgusted by the, by the approach that they took on this two and two minutes and 40 seconds, he devoted to the conversation surrounding what happened and the, his grieving for the parents.

And then the other five minutes were devoted. Dear wearing Kevlar vests in a forest. I don't know. I don't have much more to say about this at this point. I just wanted to get that out there with you guys. It's a sad day. Um, it's a horrific day and my heart goes out to any of the parents who are dealing with this tragedy, any of the parents and children who are a part of that school district, uh, there's a lot of difficult conversations and difficult times.

And, uh, yeah, it's horrible. So that's all I got for today, guys. Uh, I hope you and your family are safe. Um, please, uh, subscribe, leave a five-star review if you enjoyed this podcast while I guess enjoyed is probably the wrong word to use in this situation, but, uh, you know, if you kind of, um, like.

Conversations surrounding the actual topics, as opposed to pushing political agendas. Maybe that's worth it for you guys. But, um, other than that, that's all I got for you guys. I hope you have a wonderful day. If you are still sticking around at this point, you can go to our new website, red pill, revolution.com.

That comes for losers. If you recall some of the original episodes, red pill, revolution dot C O M, and you can actually go on there and run a free life insurance quote for yourself. Um, that's how I support the show is how I support this podcast. Head over there right now, red pill, revolution.co. Um, and you can get a free life insurance quote for you and your family.

Uh, again, I think it's gross to use any type of topics like this to push any type of thing like this. So not even going to mention any of it, uh, but if you need a quote for your family, you're looking for a hundred percent online quotes. You don't have to talk to people most of the time, you'll get a bunch of calls from a bunch of different agents.

Um, and I save you that hassle it's all on. You can go there right now and run a free quote for myself. It was $63 for a $2 million term life policy. Um, what I usually recommend is a 15 year life, a term-life policy at 15 times, your annual income for your household. So, um, that's all I got. Thank you guys so much for listening.

I appreciate you so much and 

welcome to the revolution.

In this week's episode, we take a deep dive into the VERY dark side of Baby Formula. What the scientific evidence says, the exact side effects of the most common ingredients according to medical research, and the long-term side effects of long-term usage; which include a lower average IQ and an overall 50% INCREASE in morbidity. The sad reality is that much of our nation has been convinced through malicious marketing that this convenient pharmaceutical product is a replacement for the miracle of a Mothers body, and they are DEAD wrong. We also discuss Jen Psaki's farewell to the White House Press secretary position as she eyes a 7-figure contract with Blackrock and Vanguard owned Comcast company MSNBC and take a listen in on the terrible first day on the job her replacement had.

Subscribe and leave a 5-star review today!

----more----

Protect your family and support the Red Pill Revolution Podcast with Affordable Life Insurance. This is attached to my license and not a third-party ad!

Go to https://agents.ethoslife.com/invite/3504a now!

Currently available in AZ, MI, MO, LA, NC, OH, IN, TN, WV

Email [email protected] if you would like to sign up in a different state 

For all the articles, videos, and documents discussed on this week's podcast join our substack! 

Podcast Companion Substack: https://redpillrevolution.substack.com ----more----

Please consider leaving a donation for all of the hard work that goes into this podcast. I love doing what I do and can only continue through your generosity and support! 

Donate https://givesendgo.com/redpillrevolution 

Full Transcription:

Welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams. Red pill revolution started out with me realizing every thing that I knew, everything that I believed, everything I interpret about my life is through the lens of the information I was spoonfed as a child, religion, politics, history, conspiracies, Hollywood medicine, money, food, all of it, everything we know was tactfully written to influence your decisions and your view on reality by those in power.

Now I'm on a mission, a mission to retrain and reeducate myself to find the true reality of what is behind that curtain. And I'm taking your ass with me. Welcome to the rebel. Hello, and welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams. Thank you so much for listening today. I am very, very interested to get into this discussion with you guys today.

Again, this is episode number 28, and we're going to be tackling some interesting topics. There's been some really interesting happenings over the last few, I guess, week or so since we discussed the 2000 mules documentary. So I'm very interested to get into some of these discussions a little bit. That last episode that we did was kind of a really deep dive into a singular topic, whereas we'll kind of get back to some more current events some more interesting things that have been going on over the last couple of weeks, including the change of the white house, press secretary.

And where our last, most beloved pisarski went. I guess that's how you pronounce her name. Maybe I get it right now that she's left office, but that will be one of the topics that we discuss is where did she go? Why did she go there in who is replacing her? And we'll actually listen into some of the clips from the very first white house press briefing that she did.

We're also going to go into a deeper discussion surrounding the baby formula shortage. That is right there is allegedly a shortage of baby formula. And meanwhile, Joe Biden is shutting down and the FDA is shutting down some of the largest plants in the country. And we'll discuss if you should even be giving your baby formula, we'll talk about who made the formula.

What's in the form of. And maybe some of the side effects and the actual statistical outcomes of using baby formula, which is quite terrifying. So we're going to discuss all of that and more today. So thank you so much for listening. I appreciate you from the bottom of my heart, really, truly. I love doing this.

It means so much to me. So thank you so much for being a part of it. Every single week, I plan on getting better. I plan on taking a deeper dive into some of these topics and doing everything I can to put out the best content possible. If there's anything at all that you can think of that I can do to make this podcast better, please let me know, send me a message wherever you can find me at.

He'll revolt. All right. While you're doing that. Well, maybe if you're not doing that even go ahead and hit that subscribe button right now, whether you're on apple podcasts, whether you're on Spotify, Google podcasts, wherever the hell, you get your podcasts, go ahead and hit that subscribe button. For me, it would mean the world.

That means that you're just going to follow along on this journey of us diving deeper into each one of these topics, right? And today I think is a really important discussion, whether you have kids or not, your ass was a baby at one point or another. And the likelihood of you having children, just like every single ancestor that you've had before you having children is generally quite high.

So this is a really important discussion, whether you have children now, whether you don't have children, whether you've already had children and you're you're in a later stage of life, this is something that we should really be advocating for them. It's a really a. Interesting topic discussing the history of even these things.

But anyways, I'm, I'm going too far off topic. Go ahead and hit that subscribe button. It takes two seconds. It gives you a, a very beautiful, good feeling. Know that you've done something for somebody else today to join me on this journey. I appreciate you so much. Then when you're done with that, go ahead and hit that five star review.

Some jerk left, a four star review. What is that about? This is a five star podcast. If you think there's anything less, you need to send me a message and tell me what I can do to make it better. No need to leave a review that does not. What will help is if you send me a message, truly, honestly, if there's anything I can do to make this better, go ahead and send me a message.

I would love to do that for you, but if you think this is a five-star podcast and only if you think this is a pie, five star podcast, leave a five-star review, write something nice in the reviews for me, tell me your favorite episode. Tell me whatever it is that you learned from this podcast. Whatever it is.

Go ahead and leave that five star review. Alright, done. Written, done rambling. That's all I got. All right, so let's go ahead and dive deep into this topic. The first one we're going to be looking at, I think is a little interesting. There's been some, some recent clips of Kamala Harris that have come out where she is just going on and babbling can barely put together an entire sentence, repeating herself over and over again.

And just kind of like this weird, I don't know if somebody did this in a conversation with you, you would probably be a little puzzled, right? So let's go ahead and watch our first clip today, which is going to become a Harris. Now this is a clip from a month. Where she discusses the passage of time, speaking of passages of time during the time that she repeats herself in this, you know, probably a minute and a half, two minutes goes by just over and over again.

So really just kind of, you know, we, we always talk about the difficulty that Joe Biden has speaking, but we need to put more attention on the vice-president and how much of an idiot she is as well, because this is really I don't know, I've just never, I've never really seen somebody talk in this manner.

That's being serious, especially on a political platform, let alone the second to the world leader of basically the most powerful country allegedly in the world. So here is our vice-president Eleanor and I, and we were all doing a tour of the library here. And I'm talking about the significance of the passage of time, right?

The significance of the passage of time. So when you think about it, there is a great significance to the passage of time in terms of what we need to do to lay these wires, what we need to do to create these jobs. And there is such great significance to the passage of time when we think about a day in the life of, oh my gosh.

So, so just over and over again, when you think about the passage of time and, and you, you wonder about how time really does pass now, during the time that I've been speaking about this, there has been such a passage of time that you and I both perceive said passage through the timeframe in which we are passing.

And in that timeframe, we shall pass this passage together in time. What is this really the best that we can do as a nation, right? Like there's some real, like, I don't claim to be the smartest guy in the room in most rooms. Then some I'll claim to be the smartest guy, but a lot of rooms, I don't claim to be the smartest guy.

Right. The same goes, if you're the smartest person in the room, you're in the wrong room, right. You should probably find a more, more intelligent people to be around if you're the smartest guy. So I don't claim to be the smartest guy in the room, but what I know is I can finish a sentence, right? I, I it's, it's crazy to me that out of everybody in our country, there's Harvard professors, there's, you know, unbelievable political you know, powerful individuals who have, who are profound speeches in, in, in the ability to move mountains with their words.

And this is who we pay. This is what you have for me. This is, this is who we voted for with the passage of time or who we didn't vote for. If you watched the last episode. And if he didn't listen to the last episode, you should go watch it. Cause that's crazy. Because apparently we didn't actually vote these people in office, according to this documentary and some of the statistics that true the vote came out with.

Anyways, but I digress. It's unbelievable to me that this is the best and brightest that the United States could find. This is both in an 87 year old geriatric blubbering dementia written, you know, and I don't even feel like insulting Joe Biden that much. Like it really is just kind of sad.

Right? It's it's, it's, it's sad to see, you know, it's like you could put your grandpa or your, I guess even your great grandpa in some instances in the position of Joe Biden and. And start to feel bad for this guy. The fact that his wife like pushes him up there and then HESTA hold his hand to show him where to go and when to answer questions.

And it's, it's almost sad now, now what's not sad about it is this man has been in politics for 45 years and that he has taken all sorts of money from, you know, the China's and the rushes in the funnel, it through Ukraine. And now he's pushing hundreds of bits. So it definitely plays a part. But to me, it's mostly just sad, right?

Because anybody could put their blubbering dementia written grandpa in the office and then see the effects of this. Now Kamala Harris is a different story. This woman is fully capable. She's what I don't know. 48 something, I don't know, 55 in that 48 to 55 range, probably she should be capable of completing a sentence in a coherent manner, right.

Without all the ums and the AHS and the, this and the, that, and the, the repeating of sentences, w like she should be able to use her consciousness to come up with a full thought and be able to like, imagine your teacher rambling on like that in high school, you'd be like, what the fuck is this person even saying?

So anyways, that was the first clip that was about a month ago. Now the most recent clip is the one that we're about to watch here. And this one is just as bad, just as bad as that last one only, I think it's even a little bit longer. So let's go ahead and watch this clip and see what our vice vice-president has to say this time.

I often note, and I've talked with many of you about our shared belief that our world is increasingly more interconnected and interdependent. That is especially true when it comes to the climate crisis, which is why we will work together and continue to work together to address these issues, to tackle these challenges and to work together.

As we continue to work operating from the new norms, rules, and agreements that we will convene to work together on to galvanize global action, we will, we will work together and we will continue working together to work towards the same goal together in our togetherness towards this goal together.

Again, I just, I don't get it. How can you not, how can you not complete a sentence? How can you not fully finish a thought? Right. Like in any situation, like I think the white house press secretary probably has a much more difficult job than the president in this situation to actually have to verbalize and answered in a long form format.

Some of the questions that these people have to deal with now, now the she's literally reading from something, right. It's almost like, you know, she, they, they put a topic into a Google or something and it just spit out words onto a word document. And then she said you know, th what are the key words that we want to hit here?

Well, working together. Okay. Well, and then it just started repeating itself over and over and over again. And she just started like, it's, it reminds me of a, what is it? The exact elephant academic. Where I'm pretty sure there's a scene where he has like a teleprompter in front of him. Is that a pretty sure it's that one where he has inside of Zack alpha that cause her welfare where there's a teleprompter in front of him and no, it's, it's it's Ron burgundy, anchorman, Ron burgundy, anchorman, where he has the teleprompter in front of him.

And he's reading off this speech and it's like all wrong and it's like, hilarious. I'll have to find the clip and I'll post it. Cause it's, it's so funny, but who in the world are these speech writers? Like they need to be demoted, right? And again, how is this the best and the brightest that we can find for speech writers, then she's sitting there reading a piece of paper and still cannot form a coherent thoughts around surrounding this topic.

It's it's so baffling to me that these, this is our leadership, right? Like at least give me somebody competent, right? Oh, Barack Obama. For all of his corruption and all of the shitty policies that were passed, had the ability to form a sentence. It's literally a comedy. The United States is a comedy right now with the people that we have in office.

You could literally put together a set, the satire season of shows, showing how ridiculous it is that this is who we chose for our world leadership. And you would only have to turn the knob by like 15%, like literally just a little bit 15% would get you to a point where it would be a legitimate satirical comedy from where it is right now today.

And right now it's just sad. It's just a little sad to me that this is who we have representing our great names. Like, again, I'll always fall back to this. I'm a Patriot. I believe in what our constitution stands for. I believe in what the American flag stands for. I believe that we are the greatest nation of people.

In the world. I do believe that when a hundred percent, I believe we're a great nation full of great culture. And it's been hijacked by a bunch of, multibillionaires who have put puppets into office. And in this case they just did it with the wrong, like incoherent, blubbering, idiots, like, and so again, I don't want to sound like I'm just crushing or speaking negatively consistently about the United States, I believe in the United States and what we stand for.

I don't believe in this government, I don't believe in these, these individuals who are running our country. And to me, it's just sad that, that this is who is facing us, are facing out, who is representing us on the world stage, who is going to these meetings, who is meeting with the, you know, world leaders at these global meetings.

Like the, you know, Davos, which is coming up. If you don't know what data. I did a deep dive episode onto the world economic forum in Davos and what their agenda is, their 20, 30 agenda should look into that is a really interesting topic. But, but the leadership that they've put into office to me is just unbelievably stupid.

And, and the fact that neither of them, neither of them could pass a sixth grade public speaking class with the way that they speak to the entire world on the biggest world platform, that there is, how is this the best that we have? It's not, obviously we all know that this is not the best that we have, but why are we not finding the best that we is this a legitimate, purposeful attempt to run our nation into the ground?

Like what, what, what are we doing here? Why, why has it turned into this? You know, like what, why, why are we so, humiliated on this stage right now? Why, why are. Why is everybody not looking at these conversations and being just completely demoralized with who is representing us to the public and maybe they are, maybe the left has gotten to a point now where they are a little fed up with the, the, the, you know, at least the inability to form a coherent sentence, hopefully.

But I don't know. It's really sad to me that this is who's representing us on the world stage. Now, speaking of who was representing us or representing these people, at least who was supposed to be the people who could actually speak on their behalf and form a coherent sentence in, in circle back to the actual answers.

Eventually let's talk about Jen  and again, every time I say that word, I literally have no idea how to say her stupid name.  Said her final goodbyes as the white house press secretary and oh, so sad. Just like shit. I had to cry. That she had to leave the office and be ridiculed by everybody the entire time for the way that she approached these questions.

So here is, is pisarski saying her final goodbye as the white house press secretary. And as we'll find out later, as she leaves for a horrible, very sad transition to a multimillion dollar deal with MSNBC. Hm. More on that in the. But before we do that, I do have an announcement to make. All right. I have found a way to start to be able to put some more time, energy, and effort into this, and I hope you guys enjoy it.

I hope it's something that works out for you guys as well. What I am talking about. So as I've, hadn't been having this conversation surrounding, you know, trying to figure out ways to monetize this podcast, also not implementing like, you know, men's depends, underwear where, you know, go to this website and use this code.

I just it's it's a little, I don't know. It doesn't sit right with me now from one side of it, it doesn't sit right with me as a consumer. I know most of the time I'll just press the fast forward button. Right? It's like, it doesn't do much for you now on the other side of. I also know it doesn't do much for the podcast, right.

It doesn't make any sense for a podcast to basically sell time on their podcast, to the profitability of another corporation. And so I was trying to think through some ways in which it would be both easier for you guys and easier for me to make this a mutually beneficial relationship. And this is how I've done it.

So I come from an insurance background prior to this, I had an insurance agent. Built train, help all people with sales and that type of thing had a sales consulting agency after that. But prior to that, I had my health and life license. And so what I've decided to do is to just put an online platform for you guys, to be able to protect yourself, protect your family, protect your assets through life insurance.

And now you don't have to talk on the phone with anybody. Usually what you'll get is you'll put your phone number online, you'll get a hundred different calls from a hundred different agents who are all trying to sell you some shitty policy that probably has a, you know, Universal life and all this crazy shit that you don't actually need.

And so the hands-off way that I found to do it is you can go to my website right now, red pill, revolution dot C O, and there is a link on there right now that you can click and it will take you to a landing page. That is my landing page with my life insurance license on there for you guys, you can go apply, run a quote for yourself, just to give you an idea.

I ran a call for myself a little bit earlier. It was like 60 bucks for a $2 million policy for myself. And when the things that that does for my family, if I pass away, right. Now with all the crazy shit that's been going. And all the preparation that you're doing in your life, whether it's food shortages, baby formula, shortages, whatever it is, protect your family, because you w you know, some of that stuff might happen, right?

That's the idea, some of that might happen, but what's definitely gonna happen is you're gonna die. Whether it's today, whether it's tomorrow, whether it's next year, I hope it's a hundred years from now, but it's gonna fucking happen to all of us. You're going to die. It's going to happen to you. So protect yourself, protect your family, red pill, revolution.co, go, run a quote for yourself, and then run through the application process.

There's a 95% approval rating on these life insurance products. So what I recommend is a term life policy that doesn't have to do with any of the investing BS that comes along with it. Just, just save your family from being broken when you die. Just do that. But as of right now, there's about eight or nine states specifically to sign up for that life insurance policy.

And here they are. Let me go ahead and give you what those states are. They are Tennessee. Arizona Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, West Virginia. Those are the first states right now. As time goes on and I get a couple of you guys to get the signed up, I will buy all of the other states.

Right. So if you have a state that you want me to get in and you want to sign up, let me know, send me a message. Austin at red pill, revolution.co, and I will get the appointments specifically just so that you can sign up. So let me know, send me an email. All right. So now we're going to go ahead and watch this clip with Jen Pasek singer, really sad, emotional goodbye, to all the people who have been ridiculing her and backing her into a corner on every single topic without her ever answering a single question as to what this administration absolutely actually believes.

So here is her sad.

I last briefing and it is Brian. And I wanted to start with a series of thank yous. I promised myself I wasn't gonna get emotional. Okay. Thank you. I want to say thank you to the president and the first lady. They entrusted me in serving this role for the last 15 months. And I talked about this a little bit before, but during my first conversation with them, which was in November of 2020 after the election I was very nervous when I went to see them in Delaware.

And really what we talked about for the majority of our conversation was the, the, the importance of returning integrity, respect and civility to the white house. The small sliver of, of my job here in, in engaging with all of you that doesn't not mean that we haven't let our Irish side show mine and the presidents as well from time to time.

I recognize that, but on my best days, and as I look back I hope I followed the example of integrity. That they have set for all of us and do set for all of us every day. And I'm incredibly grateful to them. I have, I'm not going to get everyone here, but I want to thank there's a Biden family that has extended and expanded far beyond the Biden named family.

And that includes people who have worked with the president and for the president for many years, Ron Anita, Bruce, Cedric, Kate, Jodie, Donald, and machete, Susan DCE, Jake, Evan, Annie Elizabeth Alexander. There's so many others. And the reason I mention them is because part of my job or that anyone's job in this role is to represent and talk about the policies of in the work of any administration.

They have integrity, grit, commitment to trying, even on the hardest days and worst days to make the world better for the American people. And I am very grateful to them. Now I'm not going to cry about the press team. Okay. Thank you to the prestige. Many of them are here. Some of them are not here because they're taking much needed days off.

It has nothing to do with me personally. I promise. But. You all know a lot of them, for those who don't know them they are incredibly tough, smart, hardworking, and deeply, deeply good human beings, deeply good public servants. And you know, people always ask me and I'm sure you guys get asked this too about whether Washington is rotten.

You know, whether everybody is corrupt here and you know, nothing good happens. And we all argue with each other. And I having done this job believe the opposite is true because I have worked with and engaged with all of these incredible people across the administration and this amazing. Many of whom are here that I get to work with every day.

And I S, as I said about Korean last week these people are already the stars of the team, but they're going to be shining stars in the future and I'll miss them a lot. Okay. Whew. I promised myself I was going to keep it together. I'm not, this is the last part of this. I want to thank all of you in this room.

You have challenged me. You have pushed me. You have to baited me. And at times we have disagreed that is democracy in action. That is it working without accountability, without debate, government is not as strong and you all play an incredibly pivotal role. Thank you for what, without accountability, without debate, democracy will not live.

And that is why we silence all of our enemies and we make sure they cannot speak on any platform without being silenced, because we don't have a legitimate argument. Okay. I promised myself I wouldn't cry. It's unbelievable that she wasn't sit up there and say, politicians are not corrupt. That she believes in a free speech debate based democracy.

Like, you know, you don't Jen. No, you don't. You wish every single one, all the Peter doosies of the world were silenced and you never had to speak to them again. That is your one wish. And we all know it. You can't backpedal now about showing your Irish side. Like I said, it's funny to me how none of there's never a positive spin on being Irish.

According to this to this administration, every time being Irish has been brought up has been a negative connotation. So to me, it's, it's so disingenuous her sitting up there about to be in tears over seven figure contract with MSNBC. I promise I'm done with the. I'm quite good at it though.

You know, you gotta, you gotta admit, I could definitely be. I posted this today on truth social. So I would like to formally send in my application for white house press secretary. If all I have to do is lie to the people I represent. All I have to do is never answer a single question that I'm asked directly.

I would. And then at the end of it, I get a seven figure contract. I'm, I'm fairly confident I could complete that job very well, but we all know I couldn't lie like that. And we all know I'm not fit to be in a political position where all I have to spout is baseless arguments and the, the silencing of every person that I ever come in, contact being the only argument that I properly can follow through on.

So anyways, I guess I won't be the white house press secretary after all, but I think the interesting conversation here is, is why MSN. Right. Why is she able to seamlessly move from white house, press secretary into a news media position so easily. And not only that, but a news media position where she's making millions of dollars, millions of dollars.

And so I did a little digging here. I tried to figure out, you know, why with the head scratch, why would MSNBC offer her a seven figure contract? And it has nothing to do with her ability to speak has nothing to do. Her ability to bring a new taste and flavor to MSNBC and know, you know, what it has to do with is all of the money that was shoveled in to the white house, where she defended all the bullshit for these large corporations, that own MSNBC.

It has nothing to do with her ability to speak, because we all know she can't answer a single question directly. What we do know is that the people who own MSNBC is BlackRock and Vanguard. Those are the two biggest corporations in the following that here I'll even pull up this little article for us surrounding who actually I had it up, I guess maybe up here it is.

All right. So there's this article that I heard is the MSNBC is not your friend follow the money. That was a fairly long read. So I'm going to skip through a little bit of it, but I do think it's quite interesting. Now they have this little infographic and it shows who owns. Okay. And then it goes on to show who owns MSNBC.

So here are the largest, so-so the top institutional shareholders of Comcast, Comcast owns MSNBC. So the question is who owns Comcast, right? Who are the biggest shareholders in Comcast? Now these names might be familiar because they own everything and including you, right. So here are the names, van guard Vanguard.

Okay. Vanguard's the number one stakeholder in Comcast. BlackRock is the second largest stakeholder in Comcast, which owns MSNBC. Okay. So it goes on to show that other organizations is JP Morgan chase. Hm. Interesting bank of America. Interesting. Now let's go find out who owns a portion, right? Let's see what BlackRock and Vanguard stake is in Pfizer percentage.

All right. Now, forgive me. I don't have a Joe Rogan, young Jamie here. I'm Googling everything on my behalf. So I have to kind of keep it flowing while we're going. It didn't have that one plan. So this says BlackRock's Madonna and Pfizer shares increased by more than 2.5 billion in the week after the announcement of the Omicron variant.

Okay. Vanguard group made a $2.7 billion up from 1 billion with Madonna and 1.7 billion from Pfizer. The shocking, shocking amount of money that Vanguard and BlackRock actually controls a large stake of that goes into these pharmaceutical companies who she has been shoving down your throat, shoving down your throat, your children's throat, your pregnant wife's throat, you your throat, so that you get their products.

That's what she's been doing. She's been playing this game where she's been paddling, the disinformation campaigns of everybody who opposes Pfizer and BlackRock and Vanguard and all of these corporations that own these entities with the idea that eventually it just give it a year. Jen, just give it a year.

I need you to argue with Peter Doocy for one year, and we'll give you a multimillion dollar contract with one of our organizations. Oh. And you probably don't even have to show your face very often for it. Quid pro quo. It's how it all works. All of these organizations own these smaller organizations and they put these people into positions or they incentivize them to give the information that they want and silence the opposing viewpoints to the point where they can't even speak in a conversation with these individuals all while on the backs of her farewell speech, she's going to come and tell us that she believes in a fair democracy where debate leads the way.

Fuck you. Fuck you, Vanguard. Fuck you BlackRock. Fuck you, Jen.  all of you. You grow. Like, Ugh, disgusting. Like all of this shit. If you're not seeing this yet, how all of this is intertwined? Every little piece of it, right? Vanguard has a big stake in Pfizer. They have a big stake in Comcast. They have a big stake.

They funded the Oscars. They put all of this money into all of these little spider webs of disgusting, gross NIS so that they can push their products in jab you in the side of your fucking body with an experimental drug, shut you down in your home, shut down your business. So you can't even make money all for profit, all for profit.

And now I have an idea, right? I have this idea about corporations and I've got to a point where, like I was a very pro. Conglomerate, you know, like I had this idea that like, you know, generally corporations we're good right now. I have an idea that kind of counter poses that, and if you don't know my political viewpoints, I'm kind of like a mixture between a conservative, libertarian hippie, like, oh, I guess that's the best way to describe me as like a conservative, libertarian ish hippie ask you know, I, that's kind of the mixture that I have and, and I, and then some social issues like access to drugs and, and the way that you go about, you know, legalizing certain drugs in, in, in some certain social programs, you know, I, I have some left leaning social positions, but for the most part, I'm a conservative ish, libertarian ish hippie.

I believe that the government should probably only have their hands in, in very little places in, mostly in, in the portions, which have to do with crime and have to do with protecting our. Those are probably where I draw the line for the most part. And even that kind of counter counters, the, the hippie portion of me, which is the fact that, you know, the war machine and all of the war pigs out there siphoning money off the backs of the blood of our children, going to war on their behalf for reasons we'll never actually fully know.

I dunno, there's my, there's my political beliefs. If you had to put it in a box and I guess, well, I guess the biggest thing is constitutionalist too. So I'm a conservative ish libertarian this. Hippy constitutionalist. If I had to put it all in the box. All right. There's there. I put it all on the table for you guys.

That's where I'm at. All right. So, I don't know how we got there, I guess BlackRock Vanguard. Okay. So, so the idea to me is with corporations is that they're this, this, this organism, right? When, when, when a company goes from being held and operated by a singular individual as a CEO that runs it, that has a vision for where the company's going and the morality behind that individual directs the morality of that company.

Okay. Now, when you take away the individual, when, when you only have shareholders, stockholders, whose only investment in that company has nothing to do with the morality and its impact on the world. It only has to do on their profitability. Okay.

So I have this idea that the, the, the organism that is a corporation thrives off of only profit. Once it's been turned into a public company, once there are shareholders, once there are stockholders, once there's board members and there's a CEO who's positioned only there to, to, to maintain profitability for the organization.

Okay. Now, to me, everything that comes from that organization, that organism that lives in breathes in the only way it survives is off of profit, that is it's food. That is its consciousness. That is its morality is all based on profit and Vanguard and BlackRock are the worst and the worst and the worst of them.

And so the only thing that they do is they, they literally they literally deteriorate countries. They, they profit off the backs of the poor and the unintelligent in, in the, the imposed political authoritarianism that was vaccines and lockdowns and all this shit that they pushed. It all comes down to profitability, right?

They found these ways to move and shift the entire world, the entire world. Now, if you don't think the origins of this, this of this sickness was not man-made to this point where you see how much profit has been made, how much billions, how, what percentage the billionaires of the world have made.

They've literally almost doubled their profits. They've almost doubled their, their net worth during the same time that the, the, the use in the eyes and the Veys and the thems of the world lost everything. They lost their businesses. They lost their personal bodily sovereignty. They lost, they lost everything.

And, and, and these corporations are profiting off of the back of this. And so they positioned people like Jen  to bring it around, to circle back. They positioned the gen Pesach is of the world. The Joe Biden's, the Camila Harris is in a position where they have either blackmail. They have either incentives, incentivize incentives.

They position them with incentives like this, where they say, Hey, Jen, if you push the narratives that we give you and you don't speak up about these things that are coming up from these opposing viewpoints, then we'll make sure you and your family are taken care of forever. Now, the only thing, and this is selling your soul to the devil, it's literally selling your soul to the devil, because that is the devil.

The devil is the organism, the organism that is, is only living and breathing off of profitability. Right? So, so that is who we're dealing with here. And, and, and that is who, you know, they're, they're. They're literally only P putting themselves in a position where they can profit off of these conversations.

So if you own the press secretary, you own every legitimate piece of, of, of truth, right? You own truth, especially when they come out with a disinformation governance board, like you own the truth because that individual gets to speak about every topic and tell the entire world what the president believes.

Even though he's a blubbering dementia written elderly, like he should be in an old folks home. We know this, that all of us know this, but they positioned her there. So she could be the talking mouth of BlackRock and Vanguard. And then eventually they give her a multi-million dollar contract with MSNBC owned by Comcast, which is owned by Vanguard and owned by BlackRock.

There you go. There's the fucking pieces to the puzzle. And this is, this is everywhere. It's not just in the white house. It's an academic. It's not just an academia it's in your schools. Like it's, it's in the public eye. It's in, it's in our local state governments. It's, it's everywhere. It's in the CEOs of conglomerate organizations.

It's in the CEOs of the apples and the Facebooks and the everywhere everywhere has to do with this, this, this like gross organism that only it only has the morality that is compass based on profitability and profitability is always based on the idea that you're siphoning that money from somewhere.

And who are you siphoning that money from? You're siphoning that money from the individuals who you can, who you can take, what little they have from their 401ks. As we see the stock markets plummeting over the last, I don't know, month and a half all while gas prices are skyrocketing, gas prices are sky SkyRide.

Housing costs are skyrocketing APR percentages. Your, your, your percentage on your loans are skyrocketing. Everything is skyrocketing. Meanwhile, inflation is up food costs are up and in your 401ks down. And Jenn Pesach is getting a multi-million dollar deal with Vanguard through MSNBC so that she can peddle their little lies to you so that they can profit and siphon your money away from you.

It's sickening. It's, it's, it's gross, it's sickening. It's frustrating. And it pumps a lot of disbelief in our government government for me. And I think that's happening all over the country. And when you start to connect these dots and you start to see that the Harvard professors get moved into the Pfizer CEOs and the Pfizer CEOs get moved into.

The head of the DIH and then how did the DIH gets moved into the head of the NIH who gets moved back to a Harvard position in, in moves into the, the head of the newest next whatever company they can find for them. It all is a circle of disgusting newness. All right. So on the backs of that conversation, let's go ahead and look at the actual new press secretary.

I think let's go ahead and get see if we can get a feel for who she is. And maybe if she'll be better, I don't know. Maybe she'll be better than Jen. Maybe she'll answer questions. I hope she does. I think that's what our country needs. If our president's an idiot and doesn't know how to finish a sentence.

If our vice-president can't talk herself out of a cardboard box without repeating herself 10 times, maybe this woman can do it. So let's see what she has to say in her opening statements about her newest position. Right. I just want to say a few words about how honored I am to be here with all of you today.

In this role, in this room, standing behind this podium, I am obviously acutely aware that my presence at this podium represents a few firsts. I am a black gate immigrant woman. The first of all, three of those to hold this position, I would not be here today. If it were not for generations of barriers, barrier breaking people before me, I stand on their shoulders.

If, if it were not for generations of barrier, barrier, breaking people before me, I would not be here. But I benefit from their sacrifices. I have learned from their expects excellence, and I am forever grateful to them. Representation does matter. You hear us, you hear us say this often in this administration and no one understands this better than presence.

Which is why his administration is not only the most diverse in history. It is filled with barrier breaking women and men from the vice-president to the cabinet secretaries to his Supreme court nominee to senior staff throughout this administration. When I did my first briefing as principal. Okay.

That's enough. So we know exactly how she opened. That was, I am the first black gay immigrant to ever have this position. Okay. So maybe you should start with your qualifications, not your skin color, who your sexual preferences are for in a bedroom setting and your immigration status. If that's how you start your opening sentence of your press secretary career, and then continuing it with representation matters.

I only have this position because of these three things. I don't know, that's down the good start. I don't know if that's the only reason that she's in the office. It's kind of sounds like it from that statement, right. Maybe you should lead with the fact that here's your education, here's your background.

Here's what I believe in, you know, whatever this is, you know, maybe the opening statement shouldn't be. Racial divide, sexuality and immigration status. I don't know who am I? Just a guy, but that, to me says a lot about where this is going to go. Now to me, I don't know. It's, it's, it's just, it's, it's crazy to me that this is going to be the person who is who's following up on gen Pataki and we know why they did this right there.

They're like insulating themselves from criticism. They're like, oh shit, we shouldn't have put the red headed white girl in there. We, we gotta, we gotta put, you know, a gay black immigrant in there to, to so that we can't be questioned, but so harshly by Peter Doocy without him being a racist homophobe.

And it seems to me like it's insulation against Peter Doocy. So that now he has to tread a little bit later so that the, and when he does not, he's going to be severely lashed by the left for, for not treading lightly with, with the minority crowd. So here is her take on the baby formula, short his conversation, and then we'll dive into that.

And start that, that topic here. So here it is. Go ahead. I was on a separate topic. The president told my colleague Jeremy diamond on Friday when he asked that the administration should have acted sooner on baby formula shortage. If we'd been better mind readers, I guess we could have this doesn't seem like a situation that would have required mind reading.

As you know, the recall state back to February, I believe political reported months ago that the FDA was forced warned about the suspected bacteria issue as early as September. Are there any specific actions that this administration took meetings, phone calls of briefings in February or any earlier to begin addressing this potential shortage of, I mean, you've heard us talk about this.

You've seen my colleagues on, on. Talking about what we have done since you know, since February we've been, we've been working on this 24 7, but I do want to give you a little bit of an update on where we are. So getting more safe and fit formula onto shelves across the country is one of the president's top priorities, right?

This is something that he is focusing on very acutely. And again, I said 24 7, we have been working on this since we have since we learned about this back in February, it's important to remember this shortage exists because Abbott closed the facility closed the facility because of safety concerns from the FDA, the FDA is working closely with avid to bring the facility back online safely.

That's the. All of the us, all of the all of the, you knows all of the, and, and this entire time she's looking at a piece of paper. She's literally looking at what she should be saying. If you watch the press secretary, they flip, flip, flip, flip, they find the topic, they look at their response and then they try to give some eye contact.

Every, I dunno, know every few periods that they find themselves in. They try to give some eye contact, a little bit of hand motion really goes a long way. And she, she has finds herself even with a piece of paper in front of her. I'm going completely off the cuff. So you'll probably hear some ums.

You probably hear some Oz, you know, is kind of a part of my, my vernacular, right. Is a part, you know, there's all these filler words that I get here, but I'm completely just talking with you guys. Like we're sitting at the bar, right? Like I'm not sitting there with a pen and a pad and a notepad, and I'm also not paid an exorbitant amount of money to speak to the entire general public on behalf of the most.

The most powerful individuals in the world and it just is, it's so crazy to me to continue that original conversation from before. Well, let, let's continue and see what she says about this baby formula shortage. Yeah. Safely. We want to make sure that this is done in a safe way. We are very, we are very close to having a path forward to safely reopening of the facility.

We can, you can expect a an announcement from FDA later today on that, that we'll go into more details. We're also moving as quickly as possible to safely bring in additional product from other countries as soon as today. We will be able to make an announcement on the expedited process to bring additional safe conduct product to the American stores, shell, to American store shelves.

And throughout the weekend we've been working closely with manufacturers and retailers to identify transportation and logistical needs to increase the amount and spread of FDA approved formula, being shipped into the country and ensure that formula is quickly moving from factories to retailers.

The president understands he gets this. He gets how stressful it is for parents trying to feed their children, which is why we're, we're leaving no stone unturned to make more safe formula available. If parents need help finding formula I encourage them to consult their pediatrician or visit HHS gov Ford slash formula.

But we have been working on this from the, from, from February, our, our administration has. Just curious, whether there are specific meetings, briefings, you know, phone calls and you can point us to, I don't have anything specific for you to point to I'm I'm, I'm happy to, to go back and get that, you know, make sure that we are fully transparent on what we've been doing, but this has been this is an important you know, this is an important priority a top priority for the president.

He's his team has been working overtime to make sure that we get formula back on the shelves and we want to do this in a safe way. And I, and again, we cannot forget how we got here. Abbott calls a facility because of safety concerns from the FDA. The FDA wanted to make sure that we formerly was going out in a safe way.

And that is the job of the FDA. And that is the job of this administration as well, very quickly on added a secretary of the Sarah said today, in terms of when things will be back to normal, that. All right. I really don't care about the rest of that. The point of that is there's this there's a baby formula shortage, and they want everybody to be terrified about this baby formula shortage.

And they called it before the shelves were empty. And then in the midst of the baby formula shortage, the, they shut down two of the biggest plants in the world for baby formula, which is Abbott pharmaceuticals. Now, if you don't know anything about baby formula and most people don't, I really haven't done much research into this until it was an interesting topic for me when I had children.

And when my wife kind of came to me, you know, it didn't really come to me, but just had the ongoing conversations about breastfeeding and, and, and the amazingness that is breastfeeding. So let's, let's jump into this conversation a little bit. They are trying to inflate this sense of scarcity. The sense of you should be fearful.

And everybody that you know, that has children should be fearful, right? They, they need to keep you in a fearful state. If it's. COVID it's Ukraine and Russia. And if it's not Ukrainian Russia, it's food shortages. And if it's not food shortages, when that's not working enough, it's baby formula shortages.

And if it's not baby formula shortages, this is whatever the next thing is going to be. There's always going to be that next fear mongering step for these companies. Now, I bet you, if we go and look at who has a large stake in these Abbott pharmaceuticals in Nestle in all of these large corporations that produce baby formula, I think we probably have some familiar names in there just like we were discussing earlier.

So baby formula, baby formula was formulated back in 1846. I believe by a chemist. Now the original idea with baby formula, a lot of times you had to get a prescription for it up until I don't know. I don't know the year, but you had to get a prescription for baby formula. The idea was to be supplementing your child's nutritional intake.

So. What would I teach my children about nutrition is usually if it doesn't, if it's not made by mother nature, if there's all the 46 ingredients, like my daughter asked me, what's in, she, she was eating the thing of chicken biscuits and she's like, well, well, how do they make, what, what, how are chicken biscuits made?

And I read her the 45 ingredients that were on the back of chicken baskets. None of which was chicken and none of which was biscuits. So it's the same thing with baby formula is, is they had to, for, for thousands of years, 20, for whatever, for whatever history you follow of how long the human population has been around Neanderthals whatever osteopathic, whatever personal hood humanoid individual you've had, baby formulas been around for less than 200 years.

Less than two, 180 years, this has been around. And all of a sudden it's like the gold standard for nutrition, for our children, even though every little bit of what your child needs is built in to the mother, it's truly incredible. The miracle that is a woman. And, and we're seeing this being stripped from them by saying, men can get pregnant and, oh, you don't need to breastfeed because the, the, the, the trans men who are pregnant, wouldn't even have that ability anyways, you know, it's like, they're, they're trying to D they're trying to take away the super powers that is femininity and, and, and diminish it to.

Baby formula and men getting pregnant and bursting people and all this ugly gross what's that show the Handmaid's tale bullshit, like women are our literal superhumans. They have everything your child needs to survive within their own bodies to create, to literally take a. Seed and turn it into a, whatever is the complexity of a human that is more, it's literally an organic 3d printer that, that creates the most unbelievable organism that the, the, the craziest technology that we have today could never duplicate your neurons, your brain, your consciousness, your ability to move your there's.

None of that, none of that comes from us. That is, that is the, the mother nature. That is God. That is the universe. That is the rift. We are a reflection of the universe and the women are the most powerful of us. Sorry. Men, women have everything that we need within them. Or within them, sorry, I'm not a woman.

I know that's a crazy statement to make these days, but I am not a woman. I can not to birth a child and I do not have Milka ducks. So, all then you're like, I've literally seen my wife do some unbill like my, my son had a baby acne, right? Every baby gets these little bumps on their face and my wife put breast milk on it.

It was a little bit gone the next day, the next day it was gone. They got Stein in his eye and breast milk gone, gone. Unbelievable. So this baby formula idea is taking away the power of the woman. And I understand that there's, you know, I don't want this to be like, don't, don't take this as me looking at women who have formula fed their child's in, in like B rating, you are like trying to diminish what you did for your child.

You did what you needed to do. And what you were told was right for your child. And oftentimes, maybe that was giving them some pharmaceuticals forty-five ingredient bullshit that. I don't know, but I, I don't want you to take this as me diminishing your decisions and what this, what I'm going to show you here in the articles that I'm going to pull up in the, in the scientific studies I'm going to pull up are going to show you the malicious intent of the marketing behind this machine that is big pharma and, and, and the fact that they, they took it upon themselves to make you believe that your children in you don't have everything that you need within your own household, in your own body to give your child where they need to grow into a healthy individual.

Okay. So let's go ahead and let's, let's discuss this shortly. There's actually an interesting, I was listening to this. I posted on. A few things about baby formula. The first thing that came to my mind when baby formula shortage rep is why the fuck are we giving our babies pharmaceutical 45 ingredient, Abbott, pharmaceuticals, Nestle, all of this BS, pharmaceutical crap to our children from birth.

And so you start diving deeper into the marketing aspects of these, of these companies, these pharmaceutical companies, and the, the, the, the gross Snus that came with how they pushed this there's this idea of baby formula. Now, now there's two ways that you can do this. You can push this this type of mass movement of, of money.

And one way is through fear. And we saw that with COVID and we saw that with the vaccine. And the other way is is, well, I guess there's three there's there's fear. There is addiction. And then there's what's the word I'm looking for? Ease of use it is like taking away the, the difficulties of life, right?

Like, so I've watched breastfeeding with my wife and my children, and then I've seen them. It's very difficult. Sometimes there's a lot of things that can come up. A lot of soreness in, in, in some women don't produce enough and, and all of these difficulties that can happen with breastfeeding. And so what the pharmaceutical companies did is said, they said, we are, we have the solution to your difficulty, right?

We, we are the ones who solved this problem, not God. Right. I posted on truth. Two is like on the seventh day of, on the seventh day, God had created on the seventh day, God appointed the CEO of Abbott pharmaceuticals because he knew the first six days weren't enough to give them nutrition to the children.

So it was like, no, the first six days were correct. There is no seventh day. He rested because he deserved it. Right. Everything that we need is within the body of the individual. And so what we'll see is that it was the, it was the presentation of a solution of, of a, a solution to your problem of that difficulty in breastfeeding is hard, is like, I've, I've watched it, right.

I'm not just coming from like, oh, the you're a man. You don't get to discuss this. No, I've seen it. I've seen the difficulties of it. I know what women go through. I I've, I've watched some, some very difficult times that my wife's gone through breastfeeding. She didn't breastfeed all of our children when we were young, when we had our first and, and it wasn't completely, you know, the formula was used in, on all this stuff.

So we were, I was a part of that. I'm a I'm in that group. Right? So again, don't, don't take this as me diminishing anybody who decided to do that. So let's go ahead and watch this clip. Joe Rogan discussed it a few days after I discussed it on my. Social account about, you know, the, the evils of the breastfeeding machine.

All right. In here it is. I keep hearing there's a formula shortage, which is terrible. The baby formula. Yeah. I saw that recently. How was that? What's going on? What's going on there? I don't know. I mean, how the fuck do you not have enough, baby? I I'm happy. They don't first of all.

And I'll tell you, he why please do baby formula. Ain't no good for babies. It's not, not most, most of them are not, but some women can't pump. Right. Right. For whatever reason, their milk ducts. Absolutely. Absolutely. And there's alternative formulas out there. Like there's really good. Some of them are like soy based.

I'm like, I don't get your child, but like when you talk about, I don't want to name companies, cause that could get me legal issues, but. The formula that's on the market has a lot of toxic ingredients in it and it ain't good for babies. What, what kind of toxic ingredients? I don't know. I haven't studied this stuff in years, but let people do their own research.

Right. And let and let people go. And there's a lot of people that have done this research. Let's see if we could find it, find out what. So the first thing that he says there is that I'm happy that there's a shortage. I'm happy that it brings up this conversation surrounding why women should know that breastfeeding is, is literally the biggest and most unbelievable miracle of life.

It's it's it's like right behind actually giving birth to a child. Breastfeeding is right there. The fact that you have all the nutrition in your body, the things that your body's creates, the antibodies that you give your child is unbelievable. And he talks about some of the negative things that are within breastfeeding and within this within the actual Within the actual ingredients of some of these baby formulas.

So I did a little bit of research on that and they was like, Hey, let's pull this up. I, he did not do enough research. I did. So here we go. Let's go ahead and talk about some of the ingredients that are actually negative within baby formula. So some of the things that are within baby foremost, I pulled up a few different things.

Now, if we go through the, the ingredients, this is from M Enfamil and that's one of the most commonly used baby formulas. Now, here is the ingredients for you guys and I'm going to read them off. Okay. Non-fat milk. Lactose vegetable oil, Palm oil, coconut soy. Hi, Alessa, sunflower oils, whey protein concentrates galactose glass.

So charades, poly dextrose, Marta. Sorelli a L peanut oil. Grip the condemn Liam Cohain oil, calcium carbonate, potassium, citrate, pharaohs, sulfate, potassium, chloride, magnesium oxide, sodium chloride, zinc, sulfate culprit, sulfate, magnesium, sulfate, potassium, oxide, Sophia sodium, Selah, date, soy lecithin, Coleen chloride sorbic acid.

And  calcium. Okay. That's half the list that you get the point. Okay. Now what I did is I took some of those ingredients and tried to figure out what the hell they are and what some of the side effects of those are. And here's some of my research. So one of those things that I went over was galactic tool ego, no saccharine.

Okay. Now, one of the things that, that ingredient specifically causes auto immune diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, or other conditions galacto oligosaccharides might cause the immune system to become more active. This might increase the symptoms of auto immune disorders and diseases.

If you have an autoimmune disease or condition, it's best to avoid this medicine until more is known. Now, the next thing is poly dextrose. Poly dextro says for pregnancy and breastfeeding, there isn't enough available information to know if poly dextrose is safe to use as a medicine when pregnant or breastfeeding, stay on the safe side and stick to food amounts.

Children, poly dextrose is possibly safe for them. When added to formula at concentrates of 2.4 grams per liter, a formula, it is also possibly safe for children four to eight years old at doses of four grams daily. Okay. I like that possibly safe. Just, just a nice legal term to say we have no idea what we're doing.

Just shove it down your kid's throat and don't Sue us. And here's how you can't because we said it's possibly safe. Soy soy is co commonly consumed in foods. However, soy is possibly unsafe when used in larger amounts found in medicine. And when pregnant, you know, maybe you shouldn't do it when you're pregnant, but you should definitely shove concentrated amounts of this stuff into your child's body directly.

Okay. So here are some of the things, so he's commonly consumed talks about breastfeeding. There isn't enough reliable information to know if it is safe to consume in large amounts. And then it says that soy is possibly unsafe when used as an alternative to cow's milk and children who are allergic to cow's milk.

Oh, that makes sense. But it also shows that there's a relation to breast. There is a relation to underactive thyroids, kidney failure, kidney stones, milk allergies, and bladder cancer all from soy. And that's within your baby's formula. Morda Barela Alpina oil. Now what this is, is an extracted oil that comes from mushrooms and other like algae and, and they take this to try and basically super impose something called DH a and DHA is, is a Large portion of what's positive for your child.

One of the, one of the many things that's positive for your child from breast milk. And they tried to duplicate that by putting it from this, you know, cause they can't actually do it any other way because the miracle of life and the miracle of a woman's body, they took algae and they took mushrooms and extracted it through this oil solvent.

And so it says that and this was a study that I, I researched about this mortar mortar irrele L peanut oil, which showed that rats had an organ weight determinations carried out which showed statistically significant differences in absolute liver weights in males, relative brain lung, and adrenal weight weights in females, as well as absolute and relative spleen weights in females.

So there was a variation in the Oregon weights based on just this one specific product alone. Okay. That's one thing. That's just one thing. Okay. There's, there's three pieces of the 45 ingredients that we just talked about. Okay. Now let's go ahead and continue this Joe Rogan clip. I think it's important to give it its due.

Cause they go over some, some pretty good stuff here. Let me go ahead and we'll continue that conversation right now. Bad about baby formula, pull up the ingredients. Just Google. What's bad about baby formula. Okay. You might have to use, it might be an alternative that would give you a bad what'd you say bad blog results.

Like that's going to give you oh, goofy shit that people are trying to sell stuff. How about toxic ingredients in baby formula that might, that might work? What are you doing over there? Jimmy Breslin with that microphone. But I don't know. It's definitely better to have breast milk. Yes. Yes. I think for some women that's an impossibility.

Right? So then maybe you got to have. That formula. Right. But I think a lot of women also can't afford the breast milk because breast milk is expensive. You know, if you can't nurse, but you mean buying breasts. Yeah. It's very expensive. Yeah. That stuff is very expensive. So it's hard to get alternatives, blah, blah, blah.

And the thing is that there are people that are making babies. There's so many times I'm going, I want to interject on this. So, so, so here's the position that I held when it comes to the Roe V Wade position. You know, I do talk about pro choice is like, you know, I'm pro choice. I believe in adoption.

I believe in parenthood. I believe in contraception. I believe in abstinence, you have many choices. One of those choices should not be having double. Right. Okay. There's one position to hold right now. My belief system, when it comes to breastfeeding is that there are other options. The only other option is not giving your child a 45 ingredient, pharmaceutical powder made by Abbott pharmaceuticals, right?

There is other options. And we're, we're just, just by closing your eyes and not looking at them doesn't mean they don't exist. Right. There's literally a McDonald's on every single corner. You can go on Google maps right now and type in McDonald's, you'll see 10 McDonald's in a five mile radius of your home.

So there are other options. One of those options is well-vetted donor banks, right? Where they basically take a women's breast milk and they test it for things. They, they make sure that, you know, there's no you know, transference of diseases and things that they're well tested, well maintained for safety and health.

And then there's also a lactation consultants. Both of those. Things solve every problem you could ever have with breast milk, lactation consultants like better access to lactation consultants and properly vetted milk donation centers. Those are your answers. The answer is not having Abbott pharmaceuticals, design a product 180 years ago that we now believe is the gold standard for nutrition, for our children.

And you don't need boobs. You know, you're a man with your, your pregnant man emoji, you can just, you know, you don't need that. You just use, use this little powder we made for you. Here's your solution. Right? And that's where we've gotten as a society is everything is solution-based and every corporation is gonna find a solution for you for every little piece of your life.

That's inconvenient like breastfeeding, right? And if you're having a problem breastfeeding, if you're not, if they're not latching, if you're not getting enough supply, if you're not, if this is happening or that's happening, there's lactation consultants. There's people whose job is literally designed to help you breastfeed.

There's a reason that there's that individual, right? There's a reason they. Right. And there should be more of them and there should be better access to them. And it should be a more of a conversation that they exist. And it's not because these pharmaceutical organizations that own these own these baby formula companies don't want that to be the conversation.

They don't want just like the same way. They don't want you to growing crops in your backyard. Did you know that the grass that's in front of your house was literally a fucking rich person's flax to show that they don't need crops? Like, I didn't know that up until like last year or so. Like that's what grass is.

It's a flex to show that you don't need to grow your own crops. Right. But they don't want you to know that they don't want you to growing your own crops. They don't want you knowing that you, you can have you, you can have your own carrots and all these, you know, chickens and all these things. They don't want you knowing that they don't want you believing that's an option because they have the solution and then they profit off of it.

Right? So lactation consultants, milk donor banks, to specific answers to every problem that you could have. Now. I'm not saying that we have the infrastructure right now. To correct these issues to the point where we can completely replace baby formula. That's probably not the case, but there are better alternatives than what these pharmaceutical companies are offering.

There's there's like very natural homeopathic ways of, of giving like goat's milk powder. And in other ways you can look up these very homeopathic ways of, of making your own formula at home. That's much cheaper, much safer. Doesn't have 45 ingredients, including algae-based oil that has no real substance to it.

That, that, that has cancer causing agents. I mean, all this crazy stuff. So, you know, again, I'm just saying these companies, I D I guess he doesn't want to get sued. I don't want to get sued. I don't know what I'm talking about. Don't listen to me. Definitely. Don't Sue me if you're in these companies, I'm just talking, but consult your physician and don't listen to me about medical advice, because I don't know what I'm talking.

And also don't Sue me for saying a company name because you know, everything I'm saying is in satire, but don't use baby formula. It's, it's a, it's a big farce. So let's, let's continue this clip B formula that is like organic holistic, but because of like FDA regulations, there's certain guidelines I gotta stay within.

So they can't say, oh, this is safe for a newborn, right. Oh. But you can technically give it to a newborn, but they can't put that on the label and say, Hey, this is good for a newborn. You can get this stuff on Amazon. Right. But there's organic, like good baby formula out there. So they can't call it baby formula.

Is that what it is? Yeah. Well, what do they call it? It's like, it's they, they stayed, they are marketed towards like more toddlers. Huh? So like, it's, it's a I want to say. Six to 12 months or 12 months to 24 months or something like that. I just had a baby. So that's why I was all in it. Some of America's biggest manufacturers, baby food have not been adequately testing and removing products with dangerous levels of heavy metals.

According to new congressional us congressional report. This is all part of an ongoing battle to make baby food safe. The new reports as Gerber and Beech-Nut didn't properly test and remove these products while sprout foods incorporated. Walmart's parent choice and plum organics were relaxed in their efforts.

Arsenic lead, cadmium and mercury were found in rice cereals. Sweet potato purees juice. And sweet snack puffs, according to a previous support from the subcommittee on economic and consumer policy committee on oversight at the time, the companies, nature cells, happy family organics and happy baby products, Beech nut Hayne, Earth's best organic and Gerber agreed to the subcommittees previous request for investigation.

The subcommittee also reached out to Walmart Campbell and sprout organic foods, which did not allow the investigation. Those companies later began cooperating.  yeah, that's what I was talking about. So there's a toxic baby food lawsuit cases for parents at the bottom there. Hmm. Interesting. Yeah. And then so then you see the ADHD autism situation popping up because of the heavy metals neurotoxins.

Yeah. Right. For parents who have bought food from any of the brands and have children with autism and attention deficit, hyperactivity disorder, both autism and ADHD have been associated with toxic metals. Yeah. So when you, when I saw that I saw this story pop up. So in the back of my mind, I'm like, good, right?

It's like, it's like, in some ways it's bad because the baby needs something. It needs something. But in another way, I'm just like, you know, it's a catch 22. Okay. Why is there a shortage? Why, well, why is there a baby food shortage?

Is it the food and price hike? I thought it was cause the here it goes. Wow. Look at that. 40% of baby food formula out of stock thread on inf infant formula shortage situation, which feels like a slow moving train wreck. First retail stock has been Rocky for months. It was already bad over the holidays.

Then a big recall, plus plant shut down in February, made it worse. Also it was a plant shut down. Oh, that's right. Because the plants had been burning. You saw that? Yeah, I did. That was like food production plants. Why is, why is that happening, man? If it's a good time to be a conspiracy theorist, it's a great spot because you know, you got a lot of fucking ammunition.

Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. I tend not to look into this stuff. It probably, because it gives me anxiety. Yeah. It gives me anxiety too. That's why I need weed Mike Tyson weed. All right. So there's the Joe Rogan experience on the crisis of baby formula shortages. So let's dive into some of the articles that I have pulled up here that I think are important to discuss.

And so I have a few different things that I will walk you through right now. But I would like to remind you, red pill, revolution dot. Oh, and you can get a life insurance policy right now for you, for your wife, for your family. Make sure that you're happily covered in the event of what we all know is going to happen.

There may be food shortages. There may be baby former shortages, but what we know a hundred percent is your ass is going to die eventually. And you want to make sure that your assets are covered. You want to make sure that your mortgage is covered. You want to make sure that your wife has the ability to afford to buy formula if that's what she decides to do, which is perfectly okay.

But head over to red pill, revolution.co. Go ahead and apply. Go ahead and get a quote. It says nothing for you. Other than getting a free quote. You can check it out, see how much it costs for you. Again, $2 million policy for myself was around $60 a month. That's crazy prices. I recommend getting a term life policy somewhere between 15 to 20 years that allows you to lock in that price for that same amount of time and while you're healthy.

And while you are young, keep that price and make sure that your family is covered. Other than that, let's go ahead and jump into these orders. And the first of which is going to be, so I'll just kind of talk you through the headlines of some of these. The first one is us is the almost alone in cast ballots against code on baby formula marketing.

So there was only two companies specifically that decided to vote against baby formula marketing codes across the entire world. The next one that we'll talk about is 80% of baby formula contains arsenic and other toxins. That's from global citizen.org. The next one is baby formula makers, still breaking global marketing rules.

After this. Lies the baby formula lawsuits for necrotizing colitis or something crazy like that. That's horrific. But really there's one specific scientific article that I found that has all of the negative short-term and long-term side effects of using baby formula compared to breastfeeding. And that's the most important one.

So I'll probably only touch on a couple of these here, but I think it's, it's interesting here that the U S was the only specific next to Bangladesh in Chad, the United States cast his vote against a voluntary international code in to restrict the marketing of infant formula and other breast milk substitutes.

And this was in 1980. One says the code was drafted in response to charges that as many as a million third-world babies died of malnutrition each year, when they are given commercial formula and other baby foods prepared under unsanitary conditions, the roll call voice vote at a special committee of the annual assembly of the world health organism.

Found 93 governments in favor of the code three against and nine abstaining. Gerald Hellman, us ambassador to the United nations in Geneva told delegates after the vote, we have serious concerns about this organization's involvement in commercial code. And this is a central basis for our inability to support this code.

There are, shall be no advertising or other form of promotion to the general public of products within the scope of this code Bangladesh and Chad voted against the code for technical reasons and have said that they will cast yes, votes on Thursday. When the full assembly meets to ratify today's votes with the exception of Japan, which abstained major us allies came out strongly in favor of the code, the 10 nation European economic committee, which voted as a block, underscored our commitment to the under guiding principles expressed in.

It says that he added the, the us government's rejection of the code did not imply a rejection of breastfeeding. We strongly support efforts to promote and protect breastfeeding as the ideal form of infant nutrition. Hellman said our own bilateral assistance programs, encompassing education training, and dissemination of information in the promotion of breastfeeding and the improvement of infant and maternal nutrition attest to this commitment.

So I won't bore you with the rest of that, but it's interesting that we were one of only two, three countries that did this says passage of the cope is a sharp rebuke to infant formula companies, which they had lobbied hard against it. The international council of infant food industries, the Zurich based industrial lobby which says its members account for 85% of world infant formula sales charged backers of the code with issuing misleading propaganda about the issue, the council's president, Ernest Saunders, who is also a vice-president of Nestle called the code restrictive, irrelevant and unmarked.

Now in government, backers of the code, love the international baby food action network, a coalition of church and consumer activists, and third rail. They groups termed the adoption of the code, a moral victory, but added the real fight begins now in getting the code implemented in setting a workable system to monitor its.

Interesting. So there has been actually a specific marketing campaigns that have been outlawed surrounding baby formula, including giving free samples of hospitals, which many, many hospitals have been going in and illegally pedaling this free samples. I posted something again that said, you know, there's only two industries that give free samples.

One of them is hard drug dealers and the other is baby formula companies. Those are the only two companies giving out free samples. They give it to you free samples at the hospital. They had tell your doctor to shove it down your throat. They get kickbacks for it. They go out to nice, beautiful dinner. So they shove these formulas down your throat, and then they send it to your fucking house.

They send it right to your address. The second you have a child, you'll get these nice, beautiful boxes of formula that you never asked for because they want to hook you on the convenience of not having to breastfeed your child. So here's the next one? It says 80% of baby formula contains arsenic and other toxins, which is a new study.

This was in 2017.

And that study was done. It's on global citizens.org. You can Google that. I don't think it's important as much to go into the specifics of that. And then, so really the, the last, the one that I really want to dive into that I want to give the most conscious effort here is the scientific article that I found.

Okay. So here it is. This is the scientific article is called, is titled breastfeeding in the 21st century epidemiology mechanisms and life long effect. I'm [email protected]. If you Google that use research, it, you will find the same article. And I'm going to start us off on page five. I think this is a really, really interesting deep dive into this the, the outcomes of this.

So it says that I'm going to just start from the top here. And see if I can, you know, maybe sift through some of the parts that aren't as important, but I do think this is these there's a few paragraphs here about the short term effects. There's a few paragraphs about the longterm effects but tune in listen, and this is a really important discussion.

There's some terrifying, terrifying statistics around the differences between using baby formula and natural breastfeeding. So let's dive into what those are. It says the results of 28 meta analysis on the associations between breastfeeding and outcomes in the children in mothers of which 23 were commissioned for the series are summarized in the table.

We won't actually look at that table. We'll discuss the actual outcomes. So it says only three studies in an LMIC is provided information about mortality, according to exclusive predominant partial or no breastfeeding in the first six months of life, a strong protective effect was evident with exclusively breastfed infants, having only 12% of the risk of death compared to those who were not.

Another three studies showed that infants younger than six months who were not breastfed had three to five times and four times increases in mortality compared to those who received any breast milk. And that the protection was decreased with age. These results are lit lent support by studies of children aged six to 23 months in whom any breastfeeding was associated with a 50% reduction in death, a 50% reduction in death for breastfeeding specifically, is that not worth your inconvenience?

Is that not worth your time? Is that not worth overcoming the malicious advertising campaigns of these pharmaceutical companies? A 50% reduction in total? It says breastfeed, breastfeeding might also protect against us in high-income countries. A meta analysis of six high-quality studies showed that ever breastfeeding was associated with a 36% reduction in SIDS and sits is a crazy conver there's literally a no, but could you imagine if there was a sudden adult death syndrome, like you just fucking died for no reason and then they just called it?

Oh yeah. I dunno. He just suddenly died. No reason, but because they're children they're infants, we just get to call it SIDS and move on. It's the SIDS conversation is gross. And, and, and if you read anything about vaccines and baby formula you'll know what the correlation and causation is. So it says that 36% reduction in sudden infant deaths, another meta analysis of four randomized controlled trials showed a 58% decrease in necrotizing enterocolitis, a disorder with high case fatality in all settings.

And that's a big thing that has many, many lawsuits. For that based on baby formula, it says in terms of child morbidity, the overwhelming evidence exists from 66 different analysis, mostly from  and then including three randomized controlled trials that breastfeeding protects against diarrhea and respiratory infections.

About half of all diarrhea episodes, and a third of respiratory infections would be avoided by breastfeeding protection against hospital admissions, due to these disorders is even greater breastfeeding could prevent 72% of admissions from diarrhea and 50%, 57% of those for respiratory infections. We discussed the risks, risks associated with breast milk substitutes in terms of biological and chemical contaminations in a different part of the study.

Our review suggests important protection against Otis otitis media in children younger than two years of age, mostly from high-income settings, but inconclusive findings from older children. Let's see, kind of run through this. When we analyze asthma, we noted the statistically significant evidence of a 9% reduction in asthma with breastfeeding, but effects were smaller.

And non-significant when restricted analysis to the 16 studies with tighter control. Alright, so maybe a 50% overall decrease in death. Yeah, maybe that's worth worthwhile. On the basis of 49 studies, our analysis of oral health outcomes showed that breastfeeding was associated with a 68% reduction in malocclusions.

Most studies were restricted that young adults de LA, all right, cool. Move on. Now. Let's look at the longterm side effects. Okay. I'm going to kind of just sift through here and make sure I'm not missing anything. All right. So there's a big, long list and table here that you can go through. Regarding the rest of that studies and findings for the short term, but I'm going to sift through a few more of these little things here.

So it says we deemed the only three studies to be of high quality which indicated they were potentially important, but not statistically significant reduction of 24%. And that's for type two diabetes. So for their incidents of type two diabetes, the pooled results from 11 studies indicate a 35% reduction in type two diabetes just from breastfeeding.

That's it? Okay. The direction and magnitude of the association with diabetes are consistent with findings for overweight in an earlier review of six studies indicating the possible protective effect against type one diabetes. All right, let's move on. Breastfeeding was consistently associated with higher performance and intelligence chat tasks in children and adolescents with a pooled increase of three to four IQ points based on the findings of 16 observational studies that controlled for several co-founding factors, including home stimulation.

Nine studies also adjusted for maternal intelligence showing a pool effect of two to six points in large randomized trial reported in an increase of more than seven IQ points. At six to five years age in a similar effect was reported in non-randomized study, which preterm infants were fed formula or breast milk.

Wow. So you can make your child literally smarter just by breastfeeding them. This is a study in Brazil, including 30 years of followup suggesting the fact of breastfeeding on intelligence, attains, his schooling and adult earnings with 72% effective breastfeeding on income explained by the increase in IQ.

It review of 18 studies suggest that breastfeeding is associated with a 19% reduction in the incidents of childhood leukemia. Almost one fifth of the children who got leukemia maybe would have not gotten their, had their mothers breastfeed specifically. All right, so I'm going to keep going here now.

Let's look at some more of these talks about, sorry. This is a fairly long study. I just want to make sure I'm not missing anything for you guys as a met analysis. So this starts to talk about, I believe.

Okay. So it says that there was a 3% decrease in the incidents of invasive breast cancer in, in, in children. The results did not vary substantially. According to menopausal status, there was a 30% reduction associated with longer periods of breastfeeding and co-founding for ovarian cancer, it's a 30% reduction.

Is this for the mother or the child? Let's see, let me go back up here. Yeah. So effects on the mother. So the table shows, so this is all basically what this does for the mom to have breastfeeds. So it says 50% more bursts would have be expected in the absence of breastfeeding. Our review conforms the increase of breastfeeding, especially exclusive or predominantly breastfeeding in.

Okay. So the mom specifically this is a meta analysis, odds ratio and view of finding and association could be predicted with overweight, but a renew of 54 articles. Okay. So now, now here's the estimated lives saved for children and mothers just specifically for breastfeeding. Here are the amount of lives that would be saved for the child and for the mother, just by breastfeeding.

It says it estimates that 823,000 annual deaths would be saved in 75. High mortality. LMI is in 2015. If breastfeeding is scaled up to near universal levels, this corresponds to 38% of the deaths of children. Under two years of age for preventable deaths, 87% would have occurred in infants, younger than six months due to a combination of high death rates and low prevalence of exclusive.

We also estimated the potential effect of breastfeeding on breast cancer, mortality using the estimates of protection from the pooled study, we estimate

that existing global rates of breastfeeding averted, 19,464 breast cancer deaths completely. Wow. How terrifying is that? So just those studies alone. Now go ahead and read those studies. I'm not going to go through the whole thing. It's it's, it's a far more amount of pages. It's a 16 page study. There's a bunch of tables, all of that for you.

And again, the name of it is breastfeeding in the 21st century. I'm going to include that in this week, sub stack podcast companion, that will include all of the articles that I discussed, including some, several more interesting studies, as well as the other articles I didn't dive into. But I think that was the most important one, 820,000 deaths would have been avoided.

Had there been a near universal amount of breastfeeding compared to. Maybe formula. Now that's a really difficult conversation to have with women who have specifically done baby formula. And I get it. It's like the it's like anybody who argues against this, this statistical facts that are. And, and, and showing in these studies was either a victim and that's the thing.

The women and the children were victims of this malicious marketing campaign. I'm not wagging my finger at women who gave their child formula. I know it's a touchy subject. I saw it when I posted some things about it. Trust me, I get it. I know it, you were duped by pharmaceutical companies to believe that the convenience is worth the, the, the is not worth.

The, the outcome is not worth the difficulty of the inconvenience and, and, and formula is an easy, easy solution, right? And sometimes you need something else besides yourself, and there needs to be a better infrastructure for these things. There needs to be an ongoing conversation about how we can empower women, how we can allow them to, to, to, you know, give as much of themselves to these situations as possible by.

One of the arguments is like, oh, well, how is women going to go into the, the, the work scenario? Well, there should be breastfeeding stations. There should be, you know, a more acceptable view on public breastfeeding. Like it's not a big deal. You're feeding your child. Like, don't be a fucking creep, maybe, you know?

But, but I think that the best thing you can do is, is, you know, put, put the word out there. The idea should be that, you know, what's best for you and what's best for your child is what's best for you and best for your child. I'm not telling you what you should have done or what you should do. What I'm telling you is that there is a very big, significant, significant difference in mortality rates and then the outcome of, of IQ and, and all of these things that we just discussed specifically, just by going through that inconvenience and, and dealing with it in, in, in speaking with a lactation consultant, when things are difficult, And, you know, and, and when things get to a point where you are not able to follow through on it, look for milk donation banks, and, and there's other ways of going about it that don't have to do with paddling, the profits of these pharmaceutical companies that push these products.

Cause that's all it is. It's a product is profitability and it's dark, deep seated, gross marketing over the last 180 years that made it seem like the inconvenience was worth the worth, you know, the, the, the convenience of, of breasts of, of baby formula was worth the outcome, right. And that it was safe and effective.

And there was no reason that you should be breastfeeding. It's basically virtually the same only we put some vitamins in there. It's not the case. It's not what it is. And, and, and so do some more research, go ahead and check out that stuff. I'll look up for the sub stack. If you're not on the sub stack already go to sub stack a red pill revolution that sub stack.com sign up.

I'll include all of the articles, all of the scientific studies. You'll see a link to the video for this episode and a few other things. And the last thing is the Patrion. So I am considering, I w I will be actually given the new way of monetizing. I don't see a need that the, I think the Patrion is a bit more work.

Then it's actually having as outcome right now. So for me, if you were on the Patrion right now, you are going to be getting a free a one-year membership to the sub stack. All right. I think that's going to be the best way to go about this. I will be doing lives. I will be doing all of that for you guys.

I will be doing additional episodes coming up. And the way that I can do that and the way that I can justify spending more time away from my family and more time away from my work and things that I need to also pay attention to is by just protecting your family. Okay. Again, go to redpillrevolution.co, sign up for some life insurance that benefits you that supports the show.

It would mean the world to me. And besides that look out for the rumble, YouTube, I'm going to be starting to upload the full episodes again, there, I think that's the best way to go about it. You know, if you have some feedback on that, please let me know, send me an email Austin at red pill, revolution.co or red pill [email protected].

If you have some input on these things whatever it is, let me know, but I'm trying to find the best way to go about it. But I do think that the best way is just to give you guys everything, give you all the, all the content. I don't want to be putting it behind the paywall. I just want to put out there that if you can, and if you need it, go ahead and sign up for that life insurance there's specific states that I'm in right now including Louisiana Michigan, Tennessee, Arizona West Virginia.

I'll even look up the list here for you guys, but and then as time goes on and I'll get all of the, the appointments for all of the states. But as of right now, there's about eight or nine states specifically to sign up for that life insurance policy. And here they are. Let me go ahead and give you what those states are.

They are Tennessee. Arizona Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, West Virginia. Those are the first states right now. As time goes on and I get a couple of you guys to get the signed up, I will buy all of the other states. Right. So if you have a state that you want me to get in and you want to sign up, let me know, send me a message.

Austin at red pill, revolution.co, and I will get the appointments specifically just so that you can sign up. So let me know, send me an email. But again, go ahead and hit that subscribe button hit that five-star review button. I appreciate you guys so much. I hope you took something away from this deep dive into the baby formula situation.

I think it's an important conversation. I hope you got some interesting insight into the change of the white house, press secretary. But all in all, I hope you have a great day. Thank you so much for listening. I appreciate you so much and welcome to the revolution. Have a great week.

In this week's episode we do a full breakdown of the controversial 2000 Mules Documentary by Dinesh D'Souza. We cut through the fluff, focusing only on the cold. hard. facts. Who True the Vote is, What data do they claim to have found that (according to them) irrefutably proves that the election was stolen from Donald Trump. We discuss how they pulled off the biggest election heist in history (allegedly), who was involved, who funded them, and even the things that may be said to refute this evidence. Do not miss this episode regardless of where you land on the political spectrum as it may wake you up to the true inner workings of our election system.

For all the articles, videos, and documents discussed on this week's podcast join our substack! 

Podcast Companion Substack: https://redpillrevolution.substack.com ----more----

Please consider leaving a donation for all of the hard work that goes into this ad-free podcast. I love doing what I do and can only continue through your generosity and support! 

Donate https://givesendgo.com/redpillrevolution 

Full Transcription:

welcome to red hill revolution. My name is Austin Adams. Red pill revolution started out with me realizing every thing that I knew, everything that I believed, everything I interpret about my life is through the lens of the information I was spoonfed as a child, religion, politics, history, conspiracies, Hollywood medicine, money, food, all of it, everything we know was tactfully written to influence your decisions and your view on reality by those in power.

Now I'm on a mission, a mission to retrain and reeducate myself to find the true reality of what is behind that curtain. And I'm taking your ass with me. Welcome to the revolution.

Hello and welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams, and this is episode number 27 of the red pill revolution podcast. And thank you so much for joining me. It's going to be a very interesting discussion today. This is going to be a little bit different than what we normally do. A lot of times we'll pull up current events.

We'll talk about things that are going on. We'll have a specific topic, but we'll generally have multiple things that we're discussing, but I think this is a pressing enough topic to where we should give it its full due its full attention. And that's what I'm going to do here for you today. And so without further ado, this episode is going to be all about the 2000 mules documentary that was just released by the Nash.

Now, if you don't know who Dinesh D'Souza is, he's a author podcaster, a overall conservative personality. He was actually, which we'll find out a little bit more about later, he was pardoned by Trump due to some type of like campaign  finance issues or something. I don't know, maybe something we should look a little bit more into, but he released a documentary recently and it's actually a decent cost for the documentary.

It costs about $30 to purchase it $20 to rent it for 72 hours, which I thought was a little steep for a lot of people. So, I did want to do a full, deep dive. I've pulled some, you know what I think to be the most important little short clips, I don't want to take away from the fact and I don't want to emphasize in, or I don't want to diminish the fact that you should buy this documentary.

You should watch the entire thing beginning to end. All I'm going to give you today is about eight full well not full minutes, but eight short clips. Well, eight minutes of clips that are cut and pieced up into about one to two minute segments of, of really topics, generators that I think we should discuss together.

And I hope you enjoy the conversation. So if you haven't heard what, this is, what this documentary is about, and you haven't heard a little bit more about in the 2020 election, there's a little bit of controversy surrounding it. Some people seem to think that the 2020 election had a little bit of shadow surrounding it, including our former president Donald Trump.

So this documentary sheds light on some of the facts. Some of the reasons that people may question the integrity of our election system, If you're, you know, I know that generally you're not every single person that listens to this is going to be on the very right side of things. And I, and I don't think that this conversation should be only for people who are pro-Trump or hyper conservative or whatever it is that you want to call it, which I don't generally wouldn't generally label myself hyper conservative.

I have social aspects of my political beliefs that lean more centrist and more libertarian than in some fiscal side of things. So I am not a die hard, , evangelical, conservative, or even a die hard,  right wing individual. I have belief systems that fall somewhere in the middle of both. So I did just kind of want to talk about that and let you know that this is coming from a little bit more of a, a little bit more of a centrist libertarian, somewhat conservative opinion.

But I do have some social issues that I fall more towards the left side of things. So, so this, this is not a complete, , diehard.  Pro , episode. So if you're not that individual stick around, cause I think it's important to still discuss these things, right. Because why should you care? Right. If, if you don't feel like the election was stolen,  why should you care?

Well, if, if a certain section of our country does believe that it really diminishes the entire point of our democracy, right? If, if if a large portion of our country believe that our democracy is built on a house of cards in, in, in lies and deception and deceit and cheating, that really, really is the systemic issue that.

Affect our country for a very, very long time to come. So I do think it's very important to have this discussion. I do think that it's very important to look at these facts. And I do think that it's an important conversation to have, because there are some very, very compelling arguments within this documentary.

And even if you're not going to shell out the $30 yourself, I think it's important for you to understand the arguments. Right. And even if you don't believe it, it's, it's important to still get the idea that this conversation's being had by a good portion of our country right now. Okay. So there's kind of the framework for you.

All right now it's a dive a little bit more into what the actual beliefs are and what the facts are and what, what this conversation is surrounding. These 2000 mules in this documentary is the idea that one party, the left specifically was a, and they go into more detail about who was a part of it and why they did it and how they did it.

We even look into, and I'll kind of take you through some of the topics from top to bottom. So some of the things that we're going to go over today is who are the people that came up with this data? How did they get that data? And how were they tracking and coming up with these, these opinions, or even more importantly, these facts.

Right. So that's the first thing we're going to talk about. The second thing we're going to talk about is the math involved, right? So what, how do we know that these 2000 mules actually affected the total outcome of the election? And then the next thing we're going to talk about how they did it. We're going to look at a interview with somebody who is actually a part of this cheating scheme, allegedly.

And then we're also going to see who they did it to who funded it, what they're going to say about this documentary. And we'll look at that side of things of like, you know, maybe, you know, to kind of the conversation around who did that sh dissociate is, and whether he's a trustworthy source here, although he's not generally the one who's coming up with the data for this.

But also, and then we'll look at kind of the outro from the episode itself.

All right. So there's the episode. That's what we're going to discuss, that the conversation that we're going to have today, so stick around for that. Now, if you're new to this podcast, I do have a newer platform that is kind of growing and kind of interesting that it's right along the lines of this documentary coming out.

But on the backs of Twitter, getting On or bought by Elon Musk, which we talked about last episode, if you haven't listened to that as a great one, go back and listen to that. But I have built a somewhat decent audience over on truth, social. True social is Trump's Twitter replicate, replicate, or duplicate.

It's, it's a lot like Twitter, which I didn't think I would primarily like the short form text content, but I found a good groove in what I'm doing and the content I'm putting out and the videos that I'm able to put out on there. So I am excited about having this new audience, if you are on their audience and you are listening to this as a result.

Thank you so much. I really appreciate you following along. I'm so glad that I'm starting to build an audience outside. If you don't know if you're only from true. I had a very large audience, about 50,000 people that came and were watching my videos from Instagram until I got shadow banned into oblivion for posting a Senate hearing about the bio labs.

And so that platform is, is still in a, kind of a holding pattern while I wait for that shadow band to kind of drop I'm hoping it does it in the next 10 to 15 days or so. And then I'll be putting out a ton more content there. You may also be listening to tick-tock. I put a ton of videos out on Tik TOK.

Anyways, besides the point, if you do have a true social, go ahead and follow me at red pill, revolt. Same with Tik TOK, same with Instagram. So you get that whole ecosystem of the stuff that I'm putting. Anyways. Thank you. And then the last thing would be go ahead and subscribe, hit that subscribe button right now.

If you're listening to this on apple podcast, Spotify, Instagram, well, probably not Instagram, YouTube, whatever. This is, go ahead and hit that subscribe button, leave a five star review. It would mean the world. To me. There's very few things that you could do today, where you could really affect somebody's life positively.

And that is one of them. It's really super easy. It's right there on your phone. All you have to do is tap that button that says subscribe. And if you're really feeling frisky, leave a five-star review, write something nice. Talk about a topic that you enjoyed, whatever it is. Thank you so much for considering doing that.

All right. Without further ado, let's go ahead and jump into it. The first topic that we're going to discuss surrounding this documentary today is going to be the who, who is the actual organization that they got this data from. Okay. So the first, the first video they're going to watch is going to be who the hell are these people?

So Dinesh D'Souza was working alongside a nonprofit called called true the vote. So let's watch their little intro from this documentary right here and get a little bit more of a background, and then we'll discuss it right here after. So here we go. Sure. Background that prepares you for this kind of work I've been in and around election intelligence and integrity for about 40 years.

We've done investigations, literally all over the world. It's a combination of data acquisition data analysis occasionally some in-depth data mining, our ability to draw meaningful conclusions, that link the who to the wind, to the, where is significant in the space. Catherine, you started the group called true the vote in the year, 2010.

What was your mission or objective? We just didn't have enough volunteers working at the polls in our local elections. So we began by training people to work in the polls. And then as we got further into it, we recognize, wow. Some of the problems you see at the polls can be attributed to problems in the voter rolls.

Well, what can we do about the voter rolls? And so it turned into something much bigger than we had anticipated. True. The vote has the largest story. Of election intelligence for the 2020 elections in the world. No one has more data than we do. So I started true the vote to ensure that every American voter has an opportunity to participate in elections.

I think I became familiar with your work when you gave congressional testimony. Now that was in the year 2014, the hypothesis was, if you were going to cheat, how might one go about this? That would be provable trackable. Do you said there might be some, let's just call them bad actors who are delivering ballots systematically and illicitly to these mail and drop boxes.

And there might be a way to track them and to bust them. We didn't know. We decided we're going to let the data, tell the tale. And we collected together a team of highly skilled contractors and put together a plan to see where the data would take us. What Greg is geo tracking. So the idea is to collect the signals that are emitted from your phone.

Your cell phone is delivering information to apps that are collecting that ping. So there are four key coordinates, the lat-long, the elevation and the time. And with that data, we can then build a pattern of life around. So there we have it. That's exactly who true the vote. Is there an organization that basically collects data surrounding voter fraud.

Okay. And they've been doing this, this isn't their first rodeo. Okay. That's, that's a, that's an important distinction. And then an important thing to understand that this is not the first time that they've done this, this, they were not designed as an organization just to go after this election specifically, they've actually had some success in the past, including an indictment in 2020.

And to show even further that they're not a partisan organization. Excuse me. They're not a partisan organization. They're not Republicans, they're not Democrats that the entire point of this is to take an approach that is non bias to making sure that there's fair elections. Okay. So in 2020, they actually were a part of the indictment and the overturning of a Republican who was caught cheating in an election, caught Harvey harvesting ballots and that person's position and role of winning that election was overturned.

And he was, is now not a sitting politician than the role that he had won that election on from cheating. So they're not a bunch of Republicans who created this organization specifically to go after this election. I think that's an important distinction, right? You have to know that it's not bias. That data is not starting from a point of bias.

That's a great way to realize that they actually have gone after successfully overturning election results for Republicans. We were caught doing this or a specific Republican. Okay. So now, now that we've kind of set that framework. That is who true. The vote is that is who Dinesh D'Souza teamed up with to come up with the data for this.

And that is who is coming up with this election fraud answer as a result of these 2000 and mules. So if you listened to close enough there, what you have heard is the way that they went about this data mining, right? The way that they are looking at this election and the way that they are believing that this election was fraudulent is based on cell phone data.

Geotracking okay. Now, if you don't know what that is, cause that's a long word and cell phones have only been around for 20 years in geo tracking specifically has only been around for a short amount of time. The, the data mining. And geotracking basically what that is is, is your phone everywhere you go.

If you don't know this you're ignorant or, or maybe you just climbed out of a whole. Your phone's always tracking you right through apps, through your location services, whatever that is, but primarily through 300,000 apps that all work together and sell your data to people like the CIA law enforcement officials.

There's, there's a, basically a big gathering of all this data in one specific place. Okay. So that's how they did it. They tracked these 2000 individuals in specific states, swing states, specifically in specific counties. The counties that mattered in those swing states because the amount of time it would have taken them to do the entire country would have been ridiculous, but they wanted to look at where the concentrated attention should have been, right.

That the concentrated focus by these parties to try to steal this election would have been in these swing states in these counties at this time at these specific ballot boxes. Now we have that framework, right? So basically what they were doing is they were tracking these 2000 individuals and finding and mapping out people who were going between a ballot box to ballot box, to ballot box, to ballot box, too, to see how many people would have been involved in the fraud in these specific counties.

And so they found 2000 people that were dropping off ballots and going from ballot box to ballot box to ballot box 25, 27, 50 in a row, in some cases. And often it was at two and three o'clock in the morning that they were doing this stuff. Okay. And what they would do is they would take basically they would go and we'll find out a little bit later with how they did it.

But what they would do is they would essentially. Track this geo data find finds these patterns of people who are going from ballot box to ballot box to ballot box, and then they would kind of try to, to follow those people. And what they found was even more interesting. The people that came through that most important question of all was the magnitude of trafficking.

Yeah. Okay, let's wait on that. That's going to be the mule math conversation, which is important to see, and that's going to be the next topic that we listened to and follow is, is, did this actually affect the outcome, right? Because great. There could have been mules. There's always mules, right? This always happens.

As we saw in that 20, 20 election, this might have had an effect. Right. But did it affect the outcome of the election specifically? So that's that video, but what I was just discussing is the fact that they followed these patterns and what they found in these patterns specifically is the same cell phone IDs that they were tracking from ballot box to ballot box were actually in teeth, a riots prior to this.

So I think that brings up an interesting conversation is, is, were these people recruited specifically because they were a part of Antifa or are these implanted people into Antifa who are designed to cause a stir are designed to get paid to do things like this election fraud, whatever it is. It's an interesting conversation that they found that out that not only were these people essentially being mules for these ballots and in trying to, or attempting to steal this election, but they're also a part of Antifa members who were violently rioting prior to this.

Okay. So I think that's an important note is that the people that they were geotracking like all of the ideas that they found in these cell phones, also had some sort of correlation, not all of them, but a portion of them had some correlation with these Antifa riots as well. So I think it's an interesting conversation.

Are they just a part of Antifa? And did they recruit people through NTFS specifically? Because. They know that those people are somewhat extremists and maybe more liable to keep their mouth shut, or maybe they had some dirt on them and said, we're going to arrest you. Or we're going to give this data over.

If you do not do these things on our behalf, I don't know. But it's an interesting thing that they found out there that there is that correlation. So let's go ahead and watch this mule math conversation and see what, you know, w what is the actual effect of this, right? What is the math cause? 2000 people that doesn't seem like a lot right in election is 81 million people voted for, for Joe BARDA.

And, that 2000 people does that seem like a lot. But when you look at the math, you see how many ballots they were harvesting and how many boxes that they went to in these specific states, it starts to add up. And so here is the mule math conversation, and let's see if this actually affected. The most important question of all was the magnitude of vote trafficking.

And these key swing states enough to tip the balance in the 2020 presidential election. Let's first narrow in on just our 2000 mules, their average number of Dropbox visits, 38. There were average number of illegal ballots deposited per visit five that's 380,000 illegal votes, but was this sufficient to put Biden in the white house?

To answer that question, we must look at each key state. In Michigan, 500 meals, averaging 50 Dropbox visits and five illegal ballots per drop. That's 125,000 illegally trafficked votes, not quite the 154,000 vote difference between Trump and Biden. So Michigan with its 16 electoral votes stays in the Biden column in Wisconsin.

100 mules averaging 28 Dropbox visits and five illegal ballot. Now real quick. I do like how they did that. I do like how they are pointing out the fact that, okay, this did not affect every state as at least if we're only taking into consideration these small counties and these small areas that we tracked, right?

They're not just saying here's every single person had a tremendous effect on this election. No, it's not every single time they're pointing out the fact that like, they just showed a Michigan. If we only go by the mules from the data that we're pulling up here, it did not affect Michigan. Right. It did not overturn the electoral votes for that swing state specifically.

So they're taken losses, they're taken Ellis first and they led with that. Right. This, in this specific state, in this specific county, this did not affect the electoral votes. Okay. And I think when we're talking about the bias conversation, that's important to note, right? Because in, in a situation you, you, we kind of expect it to a, and something like this, that's.

Large accusation that it would in every state, in every situation in every county and in every electoral vote, that they'd overturned. Right. But it wasn't the case in the way that they just broke this down. So I liked that they did that. Let's continue for a drop that's 14,000 illegally traffic votes, 6,000 votes short to give Trump the wind.

So using only our mules Wisconsin's 10 electoral votes stays in the Biden camp, but now we come to Georgia, 250 meals averaging 24 Dropbox visits and five illegal ballots per drop that's 30,000 illegally trafficked votes, far more than the 12,000 vote difference between Trump and Biden. Soar Georgia with 16 electoral votes moves over into the Trump.

In Arizona, the numbers are roughly the same 200 meals averaging 20 Dropbox visits and five illegal ballots per drop. That's 20,000 illegal votes. Again, these illegal votes are substantially more than the 10,000 vote margin that gave the states 11 electoral votes. The Biden in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania alone, 1,100 meals averaging 50 Dropbox visits and five ballots per visit that's 275,000 illegal votes.

Again, comfortably exceeding the 80,000 vote margin between Trump and Biden. So Pennsylvania's 20 electoral votes goes for Trump. Shockingly, even this narrow way of looking at just our 2000 mules in these swing states gives Trump the wind with 279 electoral votes. The Biden's 259. But no one thinks that our 2000 mules were the only mules trafficking, illegal votes to widen the search, Greg and his team lowered the criterion from 10 or more to five or more.

Dropboxes. So while he's explaining here is the fact that they were very conservative, according to him surrounding how they went about, is this a stolen election? Right? So they only looked at specific counties. And in those specific counties, did these geo location T ID tags show these individuals going from more than 10 or more Dropboxes in a single trip.

Okay. So that was their initial criteria. And under the math that we just looked at, even that even the small margin that they just gave themselves there of 10 or more boxes, a single drop still gave him the election with 200. And I think it was 2 79 electoral votes. Okay. So even that small margin gave him the win, even 10 boxes or more.

So what they're saying now is let's go back and let's be less conservative. Let's look at who went from, you know, because why in the hell would anybody be going. Ballot box to ballot box to ballot box to ballot box and let alone at three in the morning. Right. Which is what we're going to see, you know, in a lot of cases here.

And in one thing I didn't mention is this is also where the, what they're doing is they've also ID. The same individuals with these geolocation tags, all of these ballot boxes, almost all of them had video evidence, like video systems, right there showing that these people were doing this right. So they would follow the geo tags.

They would follow that individual to the Dropbox. They would see them and then pull up the video footage, which they got directly from the state. From a freedom of information act, they would actually get the video evidence and then they would match that with the geotags that there were. So it's not like they were just looking at these blips on a map.

They were taking those blips, those geotags, watching these people go from ballot box to ballot box, and then they were polling the video feeds and seeing them literally stuffing stuffing ballots into the box to the point where some idiot had them dropping on the ground. In other cases, people were taking pictures of these people doing it because it looks so ridiculous.

There's there was a lot of evidence here, but it was all substantiated with video. It was all substantiated with these ID tags from these geo locations on their cell phones. And then as far as this goes with the math that we're looking at now, they kind of take it back, right? They're like, okay, let's stop being so conservative because even if we are conservative, we can go with 10 ballots or more.

And only these specific counties, which are swing counties in swing states. Let's take it back. Let's take it to five Dropbox's. Okay. Not 10, five. And again, why the hell would you go to Dropbox, to Dropbox, to Dropbox, to Dropbox, to Dropbox, right? It's not like they were all stuffed to the brim and it's not like the people that we're following here were a part of the election committee designed to pick these ballots up.

No, the videos that they pulled show in every case, they were dropping multiple ballots off into into these ballot boxes. And that's how they got that generic number of like five. Right? In a lot of cases, you said that, you know, if you take a conservative number that they were only putting five and at the time of each Dropbox and there was 2000 in these specific counties, that's where we got this data from.

Okay. So let's look at it, what it is when they're a little bit less conservative when they look at five Dropboxes instead of 10. the huge upsurge in the number of meals from 2000 to 54,054,000 mules next, they used a very conservative estimate of just three ballots for Dropbox visit. Now, when we multiply this increased number of mules times to five Dropbox visits per mule times just three illegal votes per drop.

We find election fraud on an astonishing scale in Wisconsin, 83,565. Illegal votes were trafficked in Georgia, 92,670 in Pennsylvania, 209,505 and Michigan 226,590. And in Arizona. 207,435. Using this calculus. Trump would have won all the key states and the final electoral vote. 3 0 5 to 2 33.

Now that is scary. That's terrifying. Every single one, every single one of these swing states. Trump won according to their data. Right? And that's that 2000 jumping to 54,000 is a crazy number. 54,000 people participated in this that's crazy. 54,000 people are out there right now who committed a felony and overturned the election.

How many of those have to come out and speak? If the proper people get in front of them? How many of them are willing to give up the organization that did this? How many paper trails and financial trails are behind these 54,000 people when they brought it back down to five Dropbox's 2000 is the name of the, the is the name of the documentary only because that's all it took.

And he's still one according to this data. But if you draw it back and you become less conservative, take that from five or 10 Dropboxes to five Dropboxes the number increases substantially. And in every single case, according to this data, Trump would have won. And that's terrifying. So there's potentially 54,000 people out there right now who participated in this alleged, alleged election fraud.

That, that have information about what happened here. That know what the outcome was going to be, that, that participated in this felonious act. Felonious is kind of a silly word. I think there should probably be a better word for that, but felonious sounds like BOLO in the ass felonious at 54,000 people.

That's a lot of loose ends. That is a lot of loose ends. And, and here's my point with all of this, right. I, I think it's important to note that if we actually went after these people, if we took this evidence and if the, the machine of what our country's capabilities are when it comes to what we can actually accomplish with the FBI, with the CIA, with the police, with the sheriffs, with w all of these organizations that we have set up, if we went at this full force and we have forced these people, we shoved this data down their throat.

We sent every Sheriff's office, every CIA office, every FBI agent, a copy of this. For free, what would be the outcome of that? Right. And so I think there's definitely some ways that this can cause a triggering effectors, 54,000 loose ends out there right now that participated in this. And let's say 1% of those 54,000 people were able to speak up and were willing to give up the organization to avoid going to jail and having a felony on their record.

That's 540 people that you would have that would, would have to testify that would have to say that they participated in this. And that's one fourth of the overall that it took with this 2000 to overturn the outcome of this. It's it's terrifying. Right? And then as I spoke about originally, you know, you have to, you eat whatever side you're on, you have to care about this.

You, you, you cannot close your eyes to the fact that this election, the potential of this election being stolen is there, right? Th th th th the outcome of this may have not been completely legitimate, unless everything that they're saying is a lie and that they need to show this. I think they need to release this data.

I think that that's something that I put out is that great job to nationals the data's there. You've shown that there a legitimate case for these mules having done this now release the data because there's millions of people in a position who are frustrated with the way that our election system is being run right now, who will see this and be so ready to be outspoken and a lot more people who are a lot more intelligent than me could use this data and, and, and put together a.

A N breakable argument, right? And infallible arguments surrounding this, this election fraud. So we need to, we need the data we need. We need the license plates. We need the the corners of the city. We need the ballot boxes. We need all of that. We need to know who did this. We need the, every single person that was involved in that, that 54,000 that you tracked, let's put together a spreadsheet of what city, what state, what the timeframe was that timestamp of them dropping it off was what their license plate was.

Cause I know you can see or what type of car they drive. Right? All of that is important. Okay. So now the next thing we're going to look at is the fact that Trump actually called this a little bit ahead of time. Right? If you, if you recall, the there was a big controversy surrounding all of the ballots that were being sent out to everybody as a result of COVID right?

Cause COVID was there big sham surrounding this COVID was the reason that they had the capability to even accomplish this, right? Because the only way that they were able to get that many ballots to harvest, to drop in these drop boxes, allegedly was because under the guise that COVID would, shouldn't make it so that everybody should receive a ballot.

Right. That, that was the reasoning. So here is Trump talking about this months before this even happened. And I believe it's Charlie Kirk that brings this up. Up to his credit tweeted out in July, mail-in ballots are a disaster and he was attacked so hard by camp. And Doocy in so many, but that was, he didn't have this information.

Obviously instinct ended up being right. This is the tip of the iceberg.

So that was a lot shorter than I thought. I thought they'd actually show where Trump talked about this. Yeah, Trump was very vehemently against the ballots being sent out. He said, it's going to be the biggest, I can't do a good Trump impression. The biggest fraud. That's terrible. Sorry. But, but he came out and said that, that this was going to happen, right.

That the only reason they were pushing for all these ballots to be pushed out there, like literally everywhere was mailing ballots to almost everybody. And the reason that they pushed so hard to do that was because they knew that this type of organization could accomplish this. Right. So let's watch that next.

I think that's important is how they did it. Okay. We'll watch that first. We'll listen to that portion. And then we will discuss it and then we'll look at the confession of the mule who actually brought it up themselves. All right, here it is. Okay. Everything from filling out absentee ballot request forms for voters, but having the ballot sent to them, to actually going to the voters and obtaining the ballots from them to stealing them out of mailboxes, to actually using high quality photocopying machines, to make their own balance.

Look, these cases, unfortunately go on all the time. Trump to his credit tweeted out in July mail-in ballots are a disaster and he was attacked so hard by Kemp. And Doocy in so many. Well, he didn't have this information, obviously this is the tip of the iceberg.

All right. So I thought I'd show you that twice because you know, it was such a quick clip. So what they said is there's, there's tons of ways to accomplish this, right? Anything from harvesting these ballots from people, from mailboxes of individuals who no longer live in that state to pushing people who are in senior homes, who are, who are mentally incapable of making these decisions themselves, to paying people in low-income areas to harvest their ballots and to be able to fill them out on their behalf and then go drop them off.

So if there's $54,000 there 200,000, I think he said 200,000 total ballots. That were accomplished through this, then there's gotta be a trail. There has to be people who know this, like if there's 200,000 ballots that were a potential, there's 200,000 people out there that, that show this happened. Right.

So now it's it's how do we prove that? How do we, how do we prove that these individuals allowed this to happen? There's a huge paper trail. I mean, that's literally like, what is that? There's 300 million people in the United States. That's like 1% of the total population and was involved in this fraud in some way, shape or form.

So not, not the fact that they were actually a part of it or did it themselves, but the fact that their ballots were a part of that. So even, even if a lot of times might be against them even knowing. But I think that's important to know. All right. So here is the mule who actually confesses that this happened, right.

Actually talks about the fact that they were a part of this scheme, what they were told to do, who told them to do it and why they did it. So here is that clip right now. So, what, what was your, what was your job like? What were you doing? A receptionist. So at some point you were asked or, or sort of instructed, I guess, to start receiving people's balance.

I was just instructed to go ahead and receive balance from various Females mostly. And and on Friday they would come and pick up a payment. I assumed it was payments for what they were doing. So they would, during the week they would bring them in at various times. And then you would pay them. I call on a Friday.

Is that kind of how it went? Yes. And then I would get a call to find out how many ballots were brought in. And if they were already prefilled out first and she would come to the office, look at them. And then before she left, she would either take them herself. But other times she would ask me if I could drop them off at the library.

So what was the instruction? Just, oh, just to drop them off in the drop, the drop box, the early ballots. Can you give me an idea of how many you personally put into box hundreds could open? Yes. And was there a reason they wanted you, she wanted you to go to that Dropbox as opposed to maybe a city hall or especially on Congress?

There's no commerce there and she wouldn't want me to take it in the evening when it was dark. Also, can you think this is widespread in Yuma county or elsewhere? I would say that. So do you think that people, you know, in San Luis, they believe that their vote matters? I don't think they know the meaning of one 40.

Yes. Do you personally think that the elections in San Luis or free and fair? No. Terrifics, they've been fixed there already. No. Seriously. Who is gonna win the next election before it even happens?

No. I think that last statement was an interesting one because I've heard this before now, the source of who I heard this from was a very high level, special forces individual. And I know that sounds like cheesy and silly. But it was, it was somebody who's done like security detail for, for the president.

It is somebody that I knew through a business that I was in if like four or five years ago. And he spoke up about this and said something about how they, their elections are already known ahead of time. These corporations that are involved. And then when you specifically talk about why she was sent to those ballot boxes was because there was not cameras.

Right? And that's when we're going to get into who did this, like who funded this? Where did the money come from? Right. And so the money, what we're going to find out, came from corporations who were funding these ballot boxes that were giving the avenue, giving the, the, the capability for people to be able to do this in the first place.

Because now you don't have to walk into city hall and hand it to the nice lady behind the counter. You can go do this in the middle of the night without any cameras present. And in the middle of the night, this election can be stolen. Right. As we saw, like, if you recall back, like you think about the election, I remember like going to bed dis pretty darn confident that Trump was going to be our president.

And then there was like this crazy swing and I'm in the Midwestern area. And there was an area specifically in Detroit where they boarded up the walls, like boarded up the glass windows of the place, where they were counting the ballots because they didn't want people to look inside. And then they pulled video footage of the of this van that pulled up and have boxes of ballots, boxes of ballots.

And so there is a lot of shady things going on and that was at specifically like pretty sure where they were counting them, even, not just these shady little ballot boxes. But the shady little ballot boxes have a lot to do with that. And that's what we're gonna get into the conversation of who actually funded that.

But I think it's important to kind of take a step back and talk a little bit more about true the vote. Okay. So true. The vote Catherine is the woman that was speaking about true the vote in, in the I don't recall the man's name, but Catherine was a woman. She was recently on Fox from true the vote to discuss, I don't know exactly what she was discussing, but Fox news and, and may even have been Tucker Carlson.

Then she went on to, to discuss this. I'm not discussing this documentary, but discussing other election related matters. But she was told specifically by Fox news. And this came from Dinesh D'Souza that the director of this documentary specifically, that she was told not to discuss 2000 mules, she was told not to mention this documentary.

She was told not to mention the data that they pulled that proved this all and not to talk about this documentary specifically, which is terrifying, right? How many, there's literally very, very few mainstream mainstream medias, that you can discuss that are not extremely liberal Fox news, obviously being the biggest one.

And so if Fox news is stifling, this conversation, why, if their, if their team's player Trump who's a Republican was the, was the victim of this. Why would they not want people to know about this documentary that just tells you how powerful it is? And that tells you where Fox news loyalty law. Right. If they're not even allowing this woman to discuss a documentary where only facts are given, right.

There's very little color commentary. The only color commentary that really comes from this comes from a little panel of, of conservative talking heads, like, who was in Dennis Prager from Prager U Charlie Kirk from the Charlie Kirk show and turning point. And then a couple other individuals that I'm not as familiar.

But they had this little panel of people who you'll see in a little bit, I think where they were discussing some of these things and, and giving their opinions on them. None of the rest of this was really opinion based. It was all fact based. So the fact that Fox news did not even want this woman mentioning the name, mentioning the name of this documentary on live television is terrifying, is censorship.

Right? So, so it just tells you a lot about what you should be looking into and where you're getting your news from. Right. And that's kind of a hard thing to like, where should you be getting your news? There's a few sources that I kind of pay attention to. One of them is a, is a great Instagram account called real news.

No bullshit. So if you don't follow them, you should, they have some great content. It's very, very non-biased. They, they barely ever give any opinions. And when they do, they give, they have somebody who is on the conservative side of things. Somebody who's on a more liberal left side of things and they both give opinion.

So they say, Hey, this person thinks this, this person thinks this, but here's the facts that we can display form your own opinion.

And so that's important, right? Journalism used to always be that journalism was never really this opinion based manipulation of language to try and push their ideas and opinions onto you. News was always like, here's what happened? You form your own decision about it, right? You come up with the ideas.

We are not here to give you the idea of truth, right. And just like, you know, it kind of interesting too, with the formation of the, the ministry of, of truth over with disinformation governance board. With Joe Biden. I'm not sure where that's at right now. I'm going to have to do some diving into that.

And I'm going to do an episode a little bit later on this stuff where we're, you know, you have the Roe V Wade stuff that just came out and all the justices who are having these huge these huge protests in front of their houses and all of this stuff. So I, I will do it an episode coming up soon, hopefully in the next few days, it does talk on those points in some current events, but this is an important enough conversation I wanted to give it.

Okay. So if you're enjoying this conversation right now, go ahead and hit that subscribe button. Go ahead and leave a five star review. If you didn't already do it, I forgive you. I will forgive you this one time hit that subscribe button hit the five star reviews. If you can write something nice about what, what you like about this podcast so far what you think about it, what you think about me, whatever it is, think of something to write in there.

It helps push our, my content in front of more people and I would appreciate it so, so much. All right, now, the next thing you can do is go head over to red pill revolution that sub stack.com and sign up for our sub stack, where we have in the past been doing podcast companions. It takes two seconds to sign up.

I'm finding a better workflow for these things. I know I've said that a couple of times, but I'm really looking forward to bringing it all together. This is only my 27th episode, 27th week, few months into this podcasting thing, but I've built it fairly quickly and fairly. I had a lot of success. So I'm, I'm still trying to work through all the moving parts of this.

So, bear with me on a couple of these things. Now, the other thing that you can do is go ahead and follow us on YouTube. I'm going to revamp the rumble page now, so I can actually post this full episode on there. Cause I will not be able to post this on YouTube because the one thing that will really get you polled and banned forever is talking about any sort of election fraud, which absolutely does not exist.

So, make sure you follow on all channels, including the. Eventually we'll get unshadowed band. You got to type in the full name at red pill, revolt the at symbol red pill, revolt. Same thing for truth, social, same thing for Twitter just has two T's at the back of it. I haven't posted on there yet, but you can follow there.

Eventually. I may That's what I got for you. So let's go ahead and look at a little bit more about this, who they did it to. Okay. And that is a former Supreme court justice in Wisconsin named Gabriel man has done it for a preliminary report. He talks about the fact that there are approximately 90,000 people in Wisconsin who are in resident care facilities or nursing homes.

Sure. She's basically not capable any longer. Even remaining awake for more than a few minutes. And so were you surprised that you voted in February, 2021? Absolutely. But I was surprised to hear that she voted in the last president. Now, if you're listening to this and not watching, there's a woman, who's in a hospital facility, in a bed who is literally incapacitated with air running into her nose with her mouth and jaw just dropped open, looking like she's on her death bed.

And that's who they're talking about, who who's completely incapacitated, could not sign the ballot at all. And this person voted in, in to their own families surprise. Right. So just to give you that visual. Much to my surprise. She had voted for the last off and on for the last 10 years, I guess in my mind, I thought if you put your parent into a facility because they were incapacitated, they would not even be offered.

The volt, they make you, they make you vote here and, and so how do they make you vote? I didn't want to vote. And they told me I had, that is a real problem. Clearly it was a problem in Wisconsin, 2020, but unfortunately that's a perennial problem in other states, too. What happens is you have staff in those Ersing and what he's talking about with Wisconsin in 2020, he's specifically talking about that candidate that had the election overturned as a result of this data coming out.

So just to give you some context, Oh, sometimes they are activists politically. They get these individuals registered to vote, or it's already registered to vote. They will request absentee ballots in their names, sometimes forging their signatures and then filling out the ballots for them just prior to the 20, 20 election, the state of Texas and died at a social worker in a home for young people who were basically mentally incompetent.

She had sent in over a hundred voter registrations for these individuals who were not legally competent to vote. What about homeless shelters? You need to look. If a homeless individual is mentally capable, they ought to be able to vote 40th. The only place they can list as registered address the homeless shelter.

That's fine. But the problem there is that it's very easy. I think for them to be intimidated and coerced in Chicago, the largest election fraud case, the U S justice department ever prosecutor. They were paying homeless individuals to cast ballots the way they wanted them to cast ballot, which is even worse, right?

Like they are literally taking advantage. They are taking advantage of the elderly of the homeless of the mentally incapable to fraudulently win elections. That is who these people are going after. It's not like they're give shelling out bunches of money to help families in need. They're going after the mentally incapable individuals who cannot even have a voice for themselves.

And that's probably why they do it is because these people are not going to be the ones who are testifying in front of Congress. When their slack jaw open, their eyes shot on a hospital bed about to die. Talking to people who are about to die. There was even the election ballots that were found of people who fuck.

Yeah, these people were dead done in the dirt somehow signing their signature and checking off boxes for Joe Biden to win the election. That's how far they're willing to go. That's who these people are. That's who we're dealing with. They're willing to take advantage of the most. Disaffirm the most disenfranchised people in our society.

The most incapable individuals they're willing to take advantage of them so that their candidate can win the president. That's how far these people are willing to go. How disgusting is that? How disgusting is that? It's terrible. The, the people that they're going to go after are the, the, the most incapable individuals who can not fend for themselves, who can not speak up at a Senate hearing, right?

Th these are the type of people that we're dealing with in these situations, the, the nursing home facility caretakers, right? And, and I wonder how really organized this whole thing was right. If all these people in all these facilities, these people that are workers in these types of facilities are the ones that are accomplishing this, who are who's funding them, who is giving them the money to take advantage of these people, to push their own ideologies and to fill out these ballots on their behalf.

And that's what we'll find too. And what they said is, is that these ballots come in, regardless, even if you like move, right. Even if you move your ballot still going to go to your old address, it's not always going to be updated. So in, in sometimes we'll even said multiples and now an interesting thing to realize about the ballots is that they're not, they don't have the name on them, but what, what, where they have the name on the ballot with the name and the address is on the envelope that they send them in.

Okay. So the envelope that they send these ballots in are sent with a name and an address on them. Now, the ballot that is inside of that envelope is empty. There's no person's name, there's no data. There's nothing on there other than who you want to vote for. And so there's no trackable way of looking at who these ballots represent.

Okay. And that's an important distinction because if we knew who these people were, and we could look at who these ballots were stolen from or who they were manipulated from, then we would be able to track them, look back and find out and have a conversation with them, send the FBI's and the, you know, true to vote, whoever, whoever it is that would be going after these people, we would be able to have a discussion with them.

But the way specifically that they went about this made it so that there's no traceable way of finding out okay. Tariffs. Terrifying. And all of this stuff was in the original legislation. All of the, all of the the stuff that was passed prior to this election happening was, was released within the legislation that was happening during COVID during all these emergency orders for why we need to send out millions of ballots, to homeless individuals and, and mentally, and K capable individuals and incapacitated elderly individuals.

Right. Like horrible. Okay. That's who we're dealing with. That's who they do it too. Okay. Now the next thing we're going to look at is who funded this, right? Who is paying the money and how did they fund it and where did they fund it? And there's going to be some very, very familiar names and the ones that people have been pointing to for a few years now, As the individuals who are behind the curtain.

So let's go ahead and see who was actually funding these ballot boxes, who is actually funding these organizations and what hopefully we can, or who we can eventually point a finger at to, to go after once this house of cards falls. Pull off a heist like this on a national scale would take deep pockets.

They wanted to find out where the money might've come from, who could have funded the highest people, think of three rivers of money, really that empty into the Gulf of elections. The hard dollars to drive a check to a candidate the second year soft money or dark money. And then. The third river that people tend to neglect, but capital research centers studied intently, and that is the 5 0 1 C3 nonprofit money.

The kind of charity that you get to take a tax deduction for that river is enormous in the 2018 cycle, about $21 billion. Now, what do the IRS regulations say about the involvement of these nonprofits by I law? These nonprofit charities are forbidden to directly intervene in elections in any way, or to help a particular party or.

The IRS is emphatic that you cannot intend or even have the effect of helping one party or candidate over the other. Now let's talk about some of the key elements of this particular network that we're focusing on. We have, we have drop boxes and those drop boxes are, most people would think funded entirely by the states.

In other words, the Dropbox is in Georgia funded by the state of Georgia, but that's not entirely the case in the 2020 election. There was an unprecedented hundreds of millions of private dollars going into government election offices, the 470 million or so dollars were sent by mark Zuckerberg and his wife.

We did our part to secure the integrity of the election. There were a few other places that put in much smaller. It's one entity that put in $25 million was again a nonprofit that's part of the Arab Bella advisers, which as a total empire in 2020, took in $1.7 billion. Is there any evidence that this operation had a partisan thrust or a partisan character?

As we all know, big money rarely comes without strings attached. One of the big ones is lots and lots of Dropbox's also lots and lots of vote by mail to get your nice big checks. You had to do things like have Dropbox. Encourage vote by mail, have ads in foreign languages, all kinds of things that little by little are nudging the turnout for one particular political party.

In addition to the 470 or so million dollars that went into the duck buck operation, you also had in 2020, $120 million project, very secretive called the voter registration project. The 120 million. It came from sorosis foundation. It came from veces foundation. It came from Warren Buffett's foundation.

Of course, mark Zuckerberg, Warren buffet, George Soros, and even visa visa. The same people that you have in your wallet right now that you give your money to is putting it towards ruining our democracy. Okay. So these are the individuals that were behind this and the way that they did it was sneaky. The way that they did it was by funding these states and these cities that, and making it so that they had to put forth these ballot boxes that they had to put out absentee ballots in their city or state.

And they did them under the guise of COVID. We didn't get to the point where they mentioned it, but what this talks about a little bit later in that conversation is the fact that they did it under the idea that they were going to be doing it for safety regulations. Right. So you're not normally allowed to, to push money towards these people.

Right. But the way that they did it was, oh, we're going to do it so that you can have plexiglass when people go to vote, that you can have masks at the door, which we know. Work. Okay. That's the way that they did it. They find these sneaky little ways that they can funnel money into these organizations so that they can push the needle 5%.

Right? 5% is all. It takes 2000 people of a 300 million person country. We're responsible for overturning the select. And of that. There was a forest specific organizations that he mentioned that funded these things very much. So the biggest being mark Zuckerberg and Facebook who just quoted himself saying we did our part to ensure the the that this election was safe and fair.

Right. Do you remember how many news people, how many Hollywood folks, all of these gross, disgusting people pushing out it's a safe and fair election. How many times did you hear that? And even in on Fox news, right? There's a clip from this that I wanted to pull on. Maybe I'll pull it to push out there onto some of these social networks.

Was that all, all of the news media clips of these little talking points of feels safe and Pharaoh, the safest most fairest election in the history of the world really. How would you even know that to begin with you work for Fox, you work for CNN, you work for these organizations that are the most involved in, in pushing ideology onto our country and pushing propaganda of our government.

So why in the world would we trust any of you? Right. Why in the world would we listen to any of you saying that this is safe and fair and how the hell would, you know, to begin with you will don't you're just speaking out of your ass because the candidate that you wanted to win or, or the, the, the, the organization that's pays your salary, told you to say it, and you did it because you got paid to do it, or you didn't lose your job as a result.

And now we have a fundamentally flawed democracy. Now we have a large portion of our country, of the United States that does not believe. And, and from what this documentary outlined specifically rightfully does not believe that our democracy is safe in fare from election fraud. We know that now they have the data.

Right. And I would, again, I would really like to see this data because the documentary is very compelling in the way that it speaks of it. But I think that they need to show it to people. And so I saw something on true to vote, where they said something about ripcord, right? So they're, they're eventually planning to put this data out.

And I think you can go to the true, the vote.org, Tru T R U E the vote.org. And you will see you can sign up for their mailing list. You can even fund them what you should do with the data that they're putting out here, give and donate to them. You can do so now, speaking of donations, go to true the vote.com or.org.

I'm sorry. And donate there. Or you can also go after you give them some money, go to, go to give sango.com/red pill revolution, and you can donate to, to the red pill revolution podcast to myself to help continue this podcast. I'm not monetized. I make very little, basically no money off of this. I eventually plan on doing some sort of monetization.

We do have a Patrion set up where, where there's bonus content, where there is videos, the full video episode is up there. We usually do have specific topics. We're not going to have that off of this week's episode, because this is specifically on the 2000 meals conversation, but you can sign up for the for the.

You can also go to gifts and go.com/red pill revolution and donate to us there. And the Patrion is patrion.com/red pill revolt. It's $5 to sign up. You get the bonus content, you get the full video episode. You get the, the RSS feed, lots of cool stuff. Of once we get enough people on there, we're going to be doing a live full episode there as well.

So head over there right now, patrion.com/red pill. Revolt, go ahead and donate at give, send, go.com/red pill revolution, and I would appreciate it so much. And then head over to true devote.com and help support these people with all that they've done to help with this here. Okay. Now, speaking of this, let's talk about what they're going to say to diminish this conversation, because I think that's important.

We cannot take a bias eyes closed approach on this. We have to be able to look at both sides. We have to be able to see you know, what the fact checkers are saying about this and Denise, Denise,  just came out with a fact checking the fact checkers article, where he actually discusses and refute some of the information of the fact checkers.

But here is Charlie Kirk discussing what he thinks. So try to invalidate it. One is minimizing and then slander. So they'll try to slander Dinesh personally, they'll say, oh, Trump pardoned him or whatever. Therefore he's trying. Get back to Trump to try to reinforce the big lie. I could already see the headline in the Washington post Trump.

Pardon? Ally comes out with questionable movie. I predict right now they will say, what on earth is a conservative doing tracking private citizens. Gee, how dang, what is the national? As soon as it's doing to voters at 3:00 AM, in fact, I mean, that'll be positive. The word will be intimidation. They'll say no person is safe.

Communities of color are being tracked. People. Black neighborhoods are now going to have to fear for their life that their cell phone pings will be paired. And this is, this is Jim Crow, 2.0, I disagree with that. This is not going to be compelling enough. This is a smoking gun. This is OJ Simpson being seen, leaving the scene of the crime.

I don't care how part is in you. Are you can't dismiss all of this. How do you explain somebody going to a whole bunch of different Dropboxes with a whole bunch of different ballots on the same night at 3:57 AM in the morning. I like how he said that this is, this is the OJ Simpson leaving the scene of the crime.

It can not be ignored. Well, I don't know if you remember correctly, but OJ Simpson got off. So you're probably more accurate than the not because there's, I highly doubt that there's going to be an overturning of the election. That there's going to be a de-legitimizing of the election as a result of this.

I don't even know what that would cause how would, what would be the outcome? Right? What would happen if they're like. We agree. The data shows that Trump won. Would they kick Joe Biden out of the office and then bring in Trump like, God, that would be crazy. That would be nuts. What in the world would come of this?

If they actually did overturn the election as a result of this data and this information I think that's a more important, like they're probably the most important question is if they do decide that this is acceptable and that they're going to go after these people and agree them what, there's no precedent that's been set for that, right?

There's, there's no situation in the history where you know, they've taken somebody out of the office a year and a half into it. Now I do think that speaks enough to Dinesh D'Souza the fact that he was able to accomplish it so quickly because I'm sure a documentary of this size is very difficult to get out there and to put together in a year, a timeframe.

So good, good on him. I can not praise him enough for putting this together. It's a very compelling documentary and again, you should go pay for it. Go. Wow. I only have eight minutes of clips on here of the total, the total thing. So you should go watch the entire thing. It's an hour and a half. It's $30.

You can get to that locals.com. I think there's a few different ways that you can get it. And the other one is like a Salem Salem video or something like that. So there's a few different ways that you can go about seeing this entire documentary, but you should absolutely do it. It's very compelling.

The V the information that I'm giving you here as a sliver of the overall information and the sliver of the overall entertainment aspect of this, it's a very, very compelling argument. You should absolutely go pay that $30 and go see this documentary. Sit down with your spouse, sit down with a pen and paper and form your own opinion.

I do not want to shove this down your throat. I got, I am very I don't know. I watching this document. Really made me. And I had that belief before this, a lot of people do, a lot of people smelled it. Like you can smell the bullshit. Right? We all knew that there was something fishy going on when Trump was just trashing everybody.

And then all these ballots come in in the middle of the night. And then all of a sudden he's losing, right. We all smell some, some, some than from this. Right. But what would happen? What would happen if they decided that this was actually a fraudulent election? If they decided to accept that go after these 20 or 54,000 mules go after just the 2000 murals that they have going the 10 Dropboxes and the de legitimizes the outcome of the election, what would happen?

How did they do that? And I don't see that being the outcome, unfortunately. Well, I do see it being the outcome is a lot of the American public is going to be convinced that our democracy is flawed. And that unfortunately in many, many cases in history has led to very terrible things.

Because if you can't believe in your election and you don't believe that you have a proper voice and you believe that the oligarchy is funding these campaigns to put people in office who they believe they want to have there so they can make their money. We are no longer a democracy. And are you going to accept that?

Are you going to accept that we are no longer a democracy? And that's the question that you have to ask yourselves and if not, what are you going to do about it? Now? This is not a call to violence. And I think that's the answer. But I do think with all the technology that we have in the ways that we've gone about the way that we've seen them go about this, the way that we've seen them stifling this conversation, the way that we've seen that.

Start this information war. It has all been about censorship. It has all been about stopping and stifling. Every conversation that disagrees with them. It has all been about that. Now that we're getting platforms, we're getting true socials, we're getting Ilan, who's buying Twitter. We're getting these situations where we now have a voice, right?

We do not. We no longer have to fear speaking out for, for, for fear of losing our platforms. Now, what now? What do we do? Right. And, and my suggestion is that we get a copy of this. We get a copy of the data and we shove it down the throat of every single person who can arrest these. We send it to every single lawyer's office that is on, on the side of this, that might do something about it.

We sent it to every politician. We send it to every FBI agent. We send it to every CIA agent and we sent it to your local Sheriff's office, your local police officer, you get the license plates from Dinesh D'Souza with this rip cord situation, whatever it is. And we get it in front of every damn person that we can, because I am not willing to accept that our democracy is gone.

Are you? Because if not, there's something we can do about it. Right? And again, back to my original point, don't take this at face value. I'm not trying to shove my opinion down your throat. This was just a very compelling argument. And again, I need the verifiable data because if this is all true, I wholeheartedly believe that this election was stolen.

Now he could have made all these numbers up and in the, you know, and that's why the data is so. Show us show us the ID tags, show us the mappings, show us the timeframes, show us the videos there was. And then there's a great scene where there starts with like four people shoving ballots into this, and then it turns into 16 and then it turns into 200 and then it turns into 2000.

Okay. So if you have all that data, we need to get in front of the right people, but watch the documentary and form your own opinion. Okay. And when you do, let's figure something out that we can do about this, whether it's, you know, putting people in positions in the swing states at the ballot boxes next year, whether it's pushing and, and, and funding organizations who are going to push for voter ID, which is the true answer for this to get rid of these absentee ballots, because we're going to see this happen again in four years is going to be another pandemic right around the election that causes us to, oh, we all need to have these absentee ballots because it's so scary to go walk in person, even though you're fucking fat ass walked into McDonald's yesterday to get a burger.

Okay. There's something that we can do. We can shove this down the throats of everybody who can do something about it. We can not silence ourselves for fear of being de platformed. We have to speak out, we have to do something about it, but the first thing I need to do. Besides subscribing and leaving a five star review is to watch the documentary form your own opinion.

Okay. You realize that this is, this is the most, because if not, if, if we are, we are the last line of defense, we are all we have left. We cannot flee to any other country that has a legitimate democracy. There's nobody laughed. There's nobody who's coming to save us. We are the only one left us in the constitution, standing between them and a totalitarian regime.

We are the only country you have nowhere to go. This is the only place that we have. And you were the only person in your world who will do something about it. And that's what you have to realize. And if it's not you then who,

but first wash documentary form your opinion. And let's get to Nash to Sosa, to release the information because we have to be able to verify it ourselves. We can not just take his word. Okay, so who, sorry, that got spicy spices spicy for a second. All right. So now we know what they're going to say. Let's see what Dinesh D'Souza is.

Outro was and we'll wrap it up after that. All right, here we go. We have our nation run by a criminal cartel, masquerading as a democracy, never in us. History has a presidential election been as thoroughly corrupted by coordinated fraud, across multi both states. As we now nice and 2020 today, totalitarian regimes camouflage.

They fake elections with appearance of democracy, but they're not real democracies. We don't want to join them.

Welcome to the revolution.

In this week's episode, we discuss Elon Musk buying Twitter and the potential implications of the recent transaction. We also discuss whether Elon Musk is attempting to save the freedom of speech, or if he is actually just attempting to purchase mass amounts of human data for his plan to implant your brain. Megan Fox comes out and tells us that she and Machine Gun Kelly drink each other's blood, and the VA decides it is more important to send our doctors to take care of illegal immigrants than our own veterans. All of that and more on this week's episode!

The Patreon begins at only $5 and includes weekly bonus topics, full video episodes, and more!

Sign up now at:

https://Patreon.com/redpillrevolt

For all the articles, videos, and documents discussed on this week's podcast join our substack! 

Podcast Companion Substack: https://redpillrevolution.substack.com ----more----

Please consider leaving a donation for all of the hard work that goes into this ad-free podcast. I love doing what I do and can only continue through your generosity and support! 

Donate https://givesendgo.com/redpillrevolution 

Full Transcription:

Welcome to Red Pill Revolution. My name is Austin Adams. Red pill revolution started out with me realizing everything that I knew, everything that I believed, everything I interpret about my life is through the lens of the information I was spoonfed as a child, religion, politics, history, conspiracies, Hollywood medicine, money, food, all of it, everything we know was tactfully written to influence your decisions and your view on reality by those in power.

Now I'm on a mission to retrain and reeducate myself to find the true reality of what is behind that curtain. And I'm taking your ass with me. Welcome to the rebel.

Hello, and welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams. Thank you so much for listening today. I'm very glad you are here. This is episode number 26 of the red pill revolution podcast, and we have had some really interesting things go on in the last week. So we're just going to jump right into it.

I really don't know what else to do here, but just really just jump into these really interesting topics. So the things that we're going to discuss today are as follows. We're going to go into a conversation about the blood the blood lost of Megan Fox and machine gun Kelly. If you haven't seen that clip yet, it's very ominous, very creepy of Megan Fox discussing the way that her and machine gun Kelly S basically drink each other's blood.

Oh no, that's a conspiracy. We don't talk about those things. They're not real. You can't say that, but I can because she did. So we're going to talk about that. The next thing we're going to discuss is going to beam the veteran's administration sending medical staff from the VA down to the Southern border.

Now that the Act has been, or is being repealed. And we're going to have this flood of migrants coming into our country. They're now sending the help that is normally for our soldiers down to the border. So we're going to discuss that. We're also going to discuss the sheer hypocrisy that has been involved in the Twitter takeover of sir Elon Musk.

I think that's his new name, sir? Elon Musk. So we're going to talk about that in the last podcast last week that we discussed, we didn't know yet that this had happened. It had not happened yet. So Elon Musk, if you did not know, has taken over Twitter, he is now the largest shareholder and will effectively be running the company, which is incredible from a freedom of speech standpoint, but also quite weird from the standpoint of somebody who questions, everything and has a few questions about Elon Musk.

At this point. Now I've been in the Elon Musk fan. Until this point. And I had some of you guys, some of the commenters raise some questions here regarding the trustworthiness of Elon Musk from last week's clip, where I talked about Elon Musk being the iron man of the real world or of this reality because somewhere in a different reality, there might actually be an Ironman, but of this world, it's about the closest thing we get is Elon Musk.

And I discussed that in a lot of people chimed in and said, maybe he's not the hero that I think he is. And in fact, even worse, maybe Elon Musk. Is the villain. So we're going to discuss that today and some of the comments from people, some of the conversations and some of the weirder things that have gone on in Elon Musk's history.

So we're going to discuss that. We're also going to look at the white house looking at repealing section two 30 in section two 30 is basically a way for them to now that they're so scared about Elon Musk, having Twitter for them to essentially bypass it and take it to the government level where they can control speech now from the backend.

Now that Elon Musk has come out and said that, he's going to follow the legality of it, not the whims of the extreme left. So we're going to discuss those things. We also have a few other topics we're going to discuss, including Google launching a new woke writing function, which is.

Inclusive language, basically, they're going to re they're going to put a notification in front of you if you're not using the right pronouns, you're in your middle school speech or your middle-school document that you're writing for school. They're now going to push their woke ideology through words, through, through a word document, literally your thoughts and they're trying to shape them.

So a lot of things on the horizon today, those are just some of them. And then the last one is going to be the DHS basically testifying that it's creating a disinformation governance board on the backs of the department of Homeland security, putting out a statement surrounding calling people terrorists, who disagree or so descent in the government.

They're now coming up with a disinformation governance board, specifically on the backs of Elon Musk, securing Twitter. Wow. That's going to be a lot. We'll see you. This might take all day, but we'll get it all in there. We'll discuss it all. And some of it, you might catch on the Patreon.

So the first thing I need you to do before we discuss some of these topics is go ahead and click that subscribe button. I know you want to it's right there. I know you might've heard this and you might already be subscribed. And if you are, I appreciate you more than you could ever know, but if you are listening to this and you're not subscribed, go ahead right now.

It's good for you. It's good for me. It's good for the universe. It's good for spreading the truth now that we actually have places to do go ahead and click that subscribe button, leave a five-star review. I know there's some of you who are subscribed and I appreciate it more than you.

But the next step that you can take for me, you're just leaving a five-star review and maybe write in a nice little comment in there about, whatever it is that you appreciate about this podcast. It would mean the world to me, and it would be a good karma for you and all it takes us two seconds, two seconds, a little tippity tap, go ahead and do it.

Next thing is the substack. Go ahead and subscribe. stacked.com. Redpillrevolution.substacked.com actually. And you'll get the podcast companion, which we're back on track with following this week. So excited to get that back that out. Get that back out to you guys. A red pill revolution dot  dot com and then the Patreon $5.

Get you. Bonus content gets you access to this court server gives you the entire video podcast and you can get that at patreon.com/red pill revolt. That's all I got. Let's go head and jump into the very first clip that I have for you today, which is going to be around Megan Fox, basically just outwardly discussing.

I don't know if she got the memo that you're not supposed to do this, but Megan Fox came out and said that her machine gun. Drink each other's blood. Could you imagine a celebrity in Hollywood, nonetheless drinking the blood of another human individual for pleasure. Now we're not allowed to do that.

And if you do, you definitely can't talk about it. But here, Megan Fox is talking about the fact that her machine gun Kelly drink each other's blood, which is in the conspiracy world. Not something you're able to discuss on these mainstream media is, but apparently if you are Megan Fox, you can do so here it is Megan Fox discussing this it's a, just a few drops, but yes, we do consume each other's blood on occasion for ritual purposes. Only it is used for a reason. And it is controlled where it's let's shed a few drops of blood and each drink it he's much more haphazard and hectic and chaotic where he's willing to just cut his chest open with broken glass and be like, take my Sol.

It doesn't not happen. Let me tell you maybe not exactly like that, but it, a version of that has happened many times a version of that has happened many times as Sheila. The version of that, where he takes broken glass cuts, open his chest, and then like a demon. If you see that video and you saw the way that she just went about that, she looked like a demon.

He goes, let me drink VR. Like she was really weird there. So yeah, apparently that just happens very often. According to Megan Fox that she's drinking the blood of Megan, not Megan Kelly machine, gun Kelly, but apparently they're on the train here of Adam to the list of celebrities that we actually know 100% are drinking the blood of other humans.

And this time maybe we can even discuss this without getting, thrown into a shadowy box of the worst things you could possibly say, and then being shadow banned into oblivion. But if you do get you out of band, apparently just go to Twitter now and that's going to be the way to go. But at this point it's really interesting, right?

The adrenochrome conversation. I think that's one that is very. Been a hot topic in the depths of the conspiracy world for a while. And it really hasn't had too many mainstream conversations like this one that bring it up. Now it doesn't seem to me, is this seems more of a satanic ritualistic which not to say that the adrenochrome situation isn't involved in that, but th this seems like a weird I don't know, it's it doesn't seem like that to me, it doesn't seem like you're drinking the blood of your spouse.

For the adrenochrome, because then you would, the whole idea, if you haven't heard of the adrenochrome conspiracy, here's how it goes. The idea is basically that if you go back long enough in history, you'll see that there's a bunch of our ancestors. And especially the specifically ones in power who along the lines have had dropped seeds, basically that they drink the blood of individuals who are in extreme amounts of stress.

Because when your body's in an extreme amount of stress, it produces this chemical adrenaline and subsequently this also a chemical called adrenochrome, which flows through your bloodstream and then celebrities and the elite, and the famous people of the world. Basically drink that to get. And if you look back far enough, if you look back towards the Royal bloodline and if you're deep into the conspiracy world, you already know a little bit about that.

But the idea is that if you go back into the Royal bloodline, the blood bloodline of the British elite, they're the Royal family, and you look far back enough, you'll see that there's somebody called Vlad, the Impaler and Vlad. The Impaler is a unique individual and unique individual because he feasts off of the blood of his enemies and he doesn't just do it for the taste.

He does. He does it in a way that he puts them in the most extreme amounts of pain possible in, and he used to have people that would sit around a long there's actual paintings during the time where Vlad, the Impaler was sitting at a table around all of these dead bodies in consuming the blood of his enemies in front of his own, and his own, higher up military individuals and there's stories and poems about this that we know from back during that time. And so we know factually historically, there are people who have drank the blood of other individuals and put them into stressful situations to get high. And we know that has started through the Royal bloodline is where there's the more, most consistent historical accounts of this, obviously, because those are where the conversations stick around for awhile.

But we know that historically it's Vlad, the Impaler was a very famous individual, a part of the Royal bloodline who then passed his ways down is where the conspiracy goes that this came from even before him. But the Royal family ever since who is tied into this, we know this from prince Harry. Who are not prince Harry Prince Andrew, I'm sorry.

Who came out and said that he specifically was related to bled the Impaler once they did a DNA check. So we know historically and factually that there is parts of the Royal blood line, the Royal family that has historically and factually drank the blood of people and incited the most horrific events towards these people before they drink the blood specifically to get this adrenochrome okay.

So they're in, that's passed down through generations and turned into this whole, blackmail situation where people are doing it and they don't talk about it in Hollywood. And this is where the whole underground child trafficking. And this is a real thing. If you go on the dark web right now, you can search adrenochrome and you can find this product being sold online right now.

And the idea where children come into play with that as it's the most purest blood that you can get in this whole dark crazy. I'm sorry that we went there so early into this podcast, maybe I should have put Megan Fox a little bit lower on the agenda here. Cause we got deep really fast anyways.

So there is a little bit about the adrenochrome conspiracy now where this comes into play and where I think this is interesting is I don't think this is that this isn't them drinking, just the way that she talked about it didn't seem like that because if this was that they wouldn't be talking about it.

So frivolously, it would be a far darker, deeper conversation. And she definitely wouldn't be coming out and speaking about it in an interview. So this seems to be some weird, hype devil. Craziness now, obviously it's tied into that in some way, shape or form, but I don't think it has to do with adrenochrome but this one is a weird conversation to see somebody just outwardly, just like the way she just talked about it to me was.

I guess exactly how you would expect somebody to talk about it. If they're actually drinking their spouse's blood for fun or whatever for ritual. So anyways, let's move on to some lighter geopolitical topics, not even geopolitical but more state side on this one that the topic that we're going to be discussing next is the VA doctors are being sent down to the Southern border on the backs of the law being repealed.

That basically stopped a lot of the immigrants who were coming in from just flooding our gates. And now we know that they are literally flooding our gates. We've seen videos upon videos and on the border, hundreds of thousands of people have crossed the border. I don't know if that's a factual number, but it sounds good, but I'm pretty sure I'm fairly positive.

It's pretty close to that. And so what's happening here is the VA is sending doctors down to the border that would normally be responsible for our veterans that would normally be responsible for purple hearts with legs missing or people with PTSD or whatever. So many individuals who are military veterans who lack care.

And I know this because I am one of them. I have VA coverage and it is atrocious. It's atrocious when we're not sending a large amount of our doctors to the border to handle people who shouldn't even be coming over here, let alone getting free healthcare in lieu of the veterans who are needing it. So let's watch this video.

It discusses a little bit. There's a, I believe a Senator or a Congresswoman who speaks up on this and grows one of the individuals here. So let's watch that and see what they have to say about it. Yes or no answer is that the department of Homeland security planning to reallocate resources, doctors and nurses from our VA system intended to care for our veterans to help care for illegal immigrants at our Southern border Congresswoman let me be clear because an inter-agency effort is precisely what the challenge of migration requires, and it's not specific to 2022, nor 2021 north 2020, where the years proceeding.

But I'm just 

asking you a yes or no question. Are you planning on taking resources away from our veterans to help deal with the surge at our Southern border? That's a yes or no question actually, Congresswoman the resources that the medical personnel from the veterans administration would allocate to this.

Is under the judgment of the secretary of veterans affairs, who prioritizes the interest of veterans above all others for very noble, incorrect reasons. Do 

you know if 

you've, have you had any conversations about reallocating those resources? I have not personally, but of course our teams, our personnel have, and I'd be very pleased to to follow up with you.

Yeah. Our veterans need to know that the care that they've earned is going to be provided to them and not to those at our Southern border. The other thing, so that's what it is. Just what I already talked about with you. She's arguing with him saying the fact that you guys are going to send physicians who are specifically allocated by our tax dollars, by the money that we spend from our hardworking citizens to go help illegal immigrants crossing the border because you made shitty policy decision.

What how is that acceptable? How are we just gonna, like the fact that our politicians just do, they think things through, do they even realize how this looks like when you're taking doctors specifically who were supposed to be taking care of what, how many doctors are out there that you could have paid money to go do this, but you have them on a shitty salary.

That's why the VA care is so bad. The VA care is so bad because they pay the doctors who are just getting out of school. They pay their way through school, so that, and then they put them on a contract. So they have to come work for the VA after they get out of school. And they only get through school through the VA's money.

So they get all of the shittiest doctors who went to the shittiest schools. No offense. If you're a VA doctor, I think what you're doing is great that you're helping veterans. But it doesn't change the fact that a lot of times the care is subpar and the care is subpar because the pay is sub-par and when you pay people less money, you generally get lower quality candidates.

And so they have these people on a really low salary, one that's already contractually obligated to be fulfilled on their end. And they're in there manipulating the asset here of the doctors to send them directly to the border, to bypass our veterans who are in need. How many veterans are going to have extremely long?

I remember when I was calling the VA to get a pretty serious. Look at, I had I don't even remember exactly what it was, but it was a heart like a SVT was what it's called. And then basically what it is like you're we were trying to figure out what it was and but it was like 36 weeks or 36 days out, two months out, whenever I called it was like the most ridiculous times.

And then they came up with this thing called the veteran's choice program, where if you were 30 days or more out from the time that you could get an appointment with the physician or a specialist that you were looking for, that they would allow you to schedule an appointment at a local doctor's office.

And as soon as I pulled that card with them, what's so funny is so I would call them up and say, Hey, I need an appointment to see a cardiologist. And they would say, okay, it's about a 42 days out. We'll go ahead and schedule the appointment with you right now. I said, okay, that's not going to work.

I need it to be sooner than that. And they would say I'm sorry, sir. We can't do any sooner than that. I would say. If it's 42 days, that's outside of the 30 days and I'd like to elect the veterans choice program and go see a local doctor and what they would do is they go, oh I just found on in 29 and a half days from now, just, I just found this random appointment sitting here on my calendar.

And you can get seen 29 and a half days from now. And so they would find a way to basically push people off as far as they could, until they elected the choice program. And then they were directed specifically to find an appointment for you within the 30 day timeframe so that you wouldn't be able to elect choice.

So all in that to say that what they're doing here is wrong because the waiting times are already crazy at the VA. They're already ridiculous, like 30, 40 days out. If you have something that you believe was a heart attack, that's very concerning and I'm a young, healthy individual, right? Nothing wrong with.

As far as I'm concerned than according to the VA, because they never saw anything or took care of it. So to me, it's if that's happening to me, how concerned would I be? If I was 72 years old, 78 years old with these issues from world war two, or, from Vietnam, would you be, wouldn't be 70 if you were in world war two.

But if you were in Vietnam and then you're a war veteran and you have all of these issues and now you get pushed out 15, 20, 30, more days because they're sending your doctor who you fought for their country for. They're sending your doctor now to the border to take care of people who don't even have United States citizenship let alone, who should be the most respected individuals in the United States is combat veterans, especially disabled combat veterans who have the scars of our nations war decisions on their backs.

And to take that in and give those allocated assets, those doctors help to somebody who is not even a part of our country. How does that make any sense? How does that make any sense? It's got to, it's so frustrating to me to know that the way that there it's literally just virtue signaling. And I don't even know if this is virtue signaling.

I don't know what to call this, but to me it just, it makes no sense. It's frustrating. From a veteran's perspective, it's frustrating from a United States citizen perspective to know that they're just, bypassing the people who deserve the care the most to give it to people who are not even a part of our country, it makes no sense at all.

So speaking about weird governmental hypocrisy, let's go ahead and watch this video. So if you didn't know, Ilan mosque bought Twitter. Elon Musk bought Twitter for $44 billion. And now Twitter, the left, the mainstream media are all freaking the fuck out about it. They have no idea what to do. They're so scared of people being able to say things that they don't like, and they are freaking out about it to the point where they're so blinded by their hate, that they don't even see their own hypocrisy, which we'll see here, which is a news anchor from MSNBC discussing what he believes to be Elon Musk's the downfall of our society based on the information that Elon Musk, being able to censor people at his will like a dictator according to this man.

So let's see how ridiculous this is. Cause if you haven't seen this clip yet, it's. If you have to be so blinded to not really it almost seems like satire. It almost seems like a joke that this man can not even see himself in the mirror saying these things and realize how, just how ridiculous it really is.

So let's go ahead and we'll watch that. No, the point is people who work with this stuff, they understand how important this is. I'm not telling you, you need a Twitter account. I'm not telling you. You have to jump in the ocean to study whether the ocean levels are rising. I'm just telling you this thing matters a ton.

Do you? World's richest person who is very good at accumulating wealth and power thinks this is worth spending tens of billions of dollars on because frankly he thinks it's that valuable. And he thinks it may help him. Trump, by the way, today is claiming he won't even return to Twitter. If the ban were lifted, but few take what Donald Trump says seriously on that score.

So what is happening? This is far bigger than Trump or Elon Musk. They are symptoms of the world we're living in where technology has outpaced any of our ability to deal with it. That's true. Whether you're a parent trying to figure out what you can and can't let your kids do at various ages. It's true.

If you are a democracy like the United States that used to regulate media ownership and say, Rupert Murdoch can't have too many local TV stations and newspapers in one town. They have laws for that, that are still on the books, but the Congress hasn't gotten around to limiting whether someone can own all of Twitter.

And as we discussed in one of our special reports, just last week, if you own all of Twitter or Facebook or what have you, you don't have to explain yourself. You don't even have to be transparent. You could secretly ban one party's candidate or all of its candidates, all of its nominees, or you could just secretly turn down the reach of their stuff and turn up the reach of something else.

And the rest of us might not even find out about it until after the election. Elon Musk says, this is all to help people because he is just a free speech. Philosophically clear open-minded helper, a world helper, if you will, is that true? Should you take him at his word? Should you care about this? Whether you have a Twitter account or not, this is important.

This is important stuff. This is important stuff to know if it's just so funny. Cause if you would've played that four months ago, three months, two weeks ago, it would have sounded like a Tucker Carlson bit. Like it would have, it would've sounded like a alt right media silence, talking, conspiracy, talking points like this man is a tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist forever.

Even taking the idea that Elon Musk or the leader of Twitter or any social media company for that matter, whatever alter the outcome of an election. Oh, this man needs to be banned. This man needs to be silenced. He can't be allowed to go around saying these things. We should take away any platform that he has completely get him away from the ears of the peasants, who might be able to hear these small fringe minority of ideas.

You literally, you can't listen to that and just go this man here himself, does this guy really not see what he's doing? Like you literally just outlined every problem you outlined, the entire reason that he spent this money, you just really gave us the whole talking point of the right of the conservative of the free speech app.

Solutionists like Elon Musk refers to himself, which he was about to call them, but it sounded too positive. So he said philosophical, whatever. It's so funny to me that this man had zero, zero self-awareness to know that he was literally describing the entire reason that Musk bought Twitter to begin with.

You can turn the knob in silence. People who disagree with you, you can eliminate people of the entire party. Like the sitting fucking president of the United States that got his Twitter platform taken from him, the sitting president of the United States was eliminated from a social media platform.

And this dumb ass has the balls to sit in front of us and contemplate the potential idea that somebody else could do the same to him on his side. I don't have words for the stupidity of this, man. I can't even imagine it's sitting in a room with this guy. He's saying these things and now just like busting out laughing and just be like, do you fucking hear yourself, man?

Do you hear the words that are coming out of your mouth? Because you're literally describing every problem that everybody on the entire side of the political spectrum that you disagree with has outlined for years literally have been the victims of this have been silenced, literally sitting here in front of you right now.

I have no platform with 50,000 legitimate, organically built followers stripped away from me because I posted a Senate, hearing a Senate hearing that they didn't like that didn't follow their narrative about the Biolabs literally right here. And this man's gonna try and to have hypothetical's about the potential of his side to being affected by this.

Maybe you shouldn't have implemented this on your side to begin with. Maybe if you weren't stopping the sitting president from speaking out on the social media platform during his presidency all, while you let the leader of Al-Qaeda on there all, while you let the boogeyman Putin himself still have a Twitter today with the Kremlin, all the, while you eliminated our sitting president from having a voice, I'm one of the biggest social platforms in the world.

And now you're scared of the repercussions. That's what it is. You got your way for so long, all those right. Wingers, all those conspiracy theorists that you got silenced in the name of your truth. Nah. Wow. It's coming for you. Now you have to worry about being silenced and you're scared. You're scared because the monster that you built, that you built a, you built this entire platform on a tower of lies on, on on the silencing of any dissent on the banning of anybody who disagrees with you.

And you now are going to see the repercussions of that. And you're scared of it. That's what he's saying here. Cause he knows this is how it's been. He's done. He's sitting in front of us speaking on the TV. He can't be dumb. Yeah. He might be for sure, but he knows he's scared because. This is the problem.

When you silence speech, this is the problem, especially when you have a democracy, is that every four years, the democracy changes every four years. There's a new leader. Every four years, something is going to shift. And if you silence enough people on the other side of the pendulum always swings back and eventually it's going to come for you.

And he's scared. And they should be because there should be that thought in the back of his mind, all these extreme left wing ideologies, right? And there are literally very extreme left wing ideologies, far worse than the, what are the white right wing ideologies that are scary. What freedom of speech freedom to right to bear arms don't talk to my children.

Sex in kindergarten, maybe some things like that. Those are some really radical conservative ideas. They're scared and they don't know what to do. And so they're running around with their their, like a chicken with their heads cut off because it, because they have no idea the repercussions of what they have built, the silencing machine will come for you to eventually, because you always have to agree.

You always have to agree with whatever individual is at the helm, and you might not agree on everything. And the second you don't agree on one thing, the second you deviate from that line just a little bit. Now you're the one being silenced. Now you're the one losing your platform. So now we know the.

They're scared and they should be scared now that they have project Veritas nice and close up on that ass, finding out the truth. So we had a whistleblower from within Twitter, sending an audio file to project Veritas of their all hands on deck meeting, which was a meeting where the CEO and some board members and the CMO and a few other people that don't matter.

Not that any of those people matter anyways, basically getting together and all whining and bitching and moaning together about the fact that they have to deal with Elon Musk buying out their company. I really wish the second thing that went through that deal went through. I wish I could have been a fly on the wall in Twitter.

It must've just been like how many green haired they Z

Sobbing

It just must've been like every liberal, libs of tick-tock video combined in a single room. And it just would have been the most brilliant comedy to be able to watch this meltdown play out. It's I hope we get more of these videos, but here is the all hands on deck meeting. And this is specifically the CMO, the chief marketing officer of Twitter speaking out on this topic specifically.

So I actually have the full transcript. I pulled the video, wrote up the transcript for it. I'm going to include that as a separate sub stack this week for you guys. So go ahead and sign up right now. Red pill revolution that substack.com. You'll also get the sub stat companion, which will have all the articles, all the videos in that full transcript for you guys right down there.

It'll also include the audio podcast. It'll also include the video podcast so you can get it all right to your email. Every single. And not have to worry about going into apps and finding stuff and all that whole deal. You can just get it right to your email inbox. So pretty awesome. Go ahead and sign up right now.

Red pill revolution that sub stack.com for the podcast, companion, as well as the full transcript of this Twitter meltdown meeting, which I seem to enjoy reading a little bit more than I do listening to these things because the audio is not great as you'll see here. But I hope you can, it's not terrible, but you can still make everything out.

But I think the transcript, you can just get through it a lot faster and it's a 45 minute meeting of them bitching and moaning. So maybe you don't want to hear that, but you can skim it and get the gist probably a little bit easier. So let's go ahead and start this video. And how did the board and Mr.

Musk plan on dealing with a mass Exodus considering the acquisition is by a person with questionable. The question of attrition as product stated, one of the themes of today is continuity and ensuring that Prague and this leadership team continues to operate the business successfully on behalf of our users on behalf of our customers.

And that has obviously been a big topic of discussion at the board. And as I mentioned in an area that is important to Elon Musk as well, because the important of Twitter as a service with no board in place who will keep Ilan accountable and how you don't want me to clear in public that a large part of the reason he bought the platform was because of our moderation policies and disagreements in how we deal with health is puts Twitter service and trust and safety, as well as anybody who cares about how on the platform in a very difficult position, greater service, the corner for policies and the capabilities we've built around content model.

I find a mental to keeping quitter safe and growing. I believe that there is a lot of work we have to do to continue making that better. Sometimes that means more thoughtful moderation. Sometimes that means making things simpler. Sometimes that means changing product incentives to be able to solve problems to products sometimes instead of policies during the last all hands, you said that you trust Elon Musk, the correct quote was we trust him.

So who is we and talking to Elon, what made you trust him? And based on the conversation I had with him, when we were excited to have him join our board, that was because at the major shelters. And an opinionated user we've wanted that Weiss in our boardroom so that we could learn. Is there an updated understanding on what free speech means?

The question behind the question here, which is where my us product goal as a private company in the future, once this deal closes to best gain perspective on this, as I said earlier, we'll find ways to bring it on for Q and a, with all of you to understand better what his vision for the future of cricket might look like.

Did you just hear that last question she asked? What does freedom of speech like w let me go back. Cause I think that's, probably the single most important part of that entire video while I, rubbed some, there we go, got a little bit of substance on my Desk here. All right. So now that's taken care of the part of that video, to me, that was the most concerning was the very last question there.

And obviously she started that by saying that the, her new boss has questionable ethics, which is probably, could you imagine being like joining a company and immediately making a statement to every single individual within the entire company that the new owner of your company has questionable ethics?

Like not even just saying he's bad at business, not saying that, he's a liar, just that he's his moral character entirely as a question here by this chief marketing officer. Okay. Now the more pressing issue here, I think was that last question, which was let's go ahead and run that.

She says, is there an updated understanding on what free speech means? What do you realize? Free speech is a ver okay. Free means unhindered UN UN kept free. You don't know what the word free means. Lady. You're the executive on Twitter and you don't know what free speech means.

Freedom of speech. Is there an updated understanding on what free speech means? Maybe what the law goes by is free speech and everything else is a hindrance. And isn't an opinion. And can literally be changed at the whim of whoever is in power. Is there an updated understand? No, it's the same understanding that we had when our country was established in 1776 and the constitution was written the same understanding of the freedom of speech.

The same idea of free speech back then applies today, which means don't tell people what they can say, unless they're violently threatening somebody and have the intention of following through, or if they yell fire in a crowded movie theater, as people like to point out, okay, that's about it. And maybe even doxing, let's throw that one in there, even though it's not a specific law.

It has to do with harassment. So it's in there somewhere. We've talked about that before, but freedom of speech means unhindered speech. That is exactly what Ulama said, which means that if we're going to put these policies in place, they should, if there is anything that is done to hinder freedom of speech, it should piss off the most radical 10% of the left equally, as much as it pisses off the most radical 10% of the right.

And if you do that is equal opportunity and in an equal way for this platform to thrive and still hold the idea of freedom of speech, because then it's not an opinion, it's an opinion based, but when you see people like Milo Yiannopoulos, whatever his name is, Alex Jones, Donald Trump literally point me to a liberal who's been kicked off of the platform for speaking out on liberal talking points.

You can't right. So for you to ask, what is the updated understanding of free speech is just the most ridiculous, disgusting, exact reason that Elon Musk bought the platform to begin with is because you can't even define the freedom of speech. You idiot

anyways, all the more reason to be happy about this, all the more reason to be excited. Now we are going to see the government, sorry about that. The government, the white house is looking to see what they can do as we'll see on what's on your radar, Bobby or Robbie, or pretty sure it's Robbie. I don't know whatever this guy's name is.

Oh, whereabouts to see it. The white house is now considering ways that they can step in for Twitter and start silencing your speech anyways, on these platforms and see if they can implement totalitarianism from their end, since the way that they've been doing it from the backend through Twitter and lobbying and quid pro quos and Saudi Arabian government ties and all of these crazy things.

Now they're looking at re basically putting a new laws into place so that they can do it from the government standpoint, which is going to be much more difficult to accomplish because there's a constitution between them and accomplishing this goal. And there wasn't that with Twitter, maybe when there should have been.

So let's go ahead and see you. Is that it has on his radar today. All right, Robbie, 

what's on your radar. Yesterday in my radar, I explained why so many members of the mainstream media are losing their minds over Elon Musk, acquisition of Twitter. They're afraid that if must makes the platforms, rules more favorable for free speech, their power to control the conversation and brand all dissenting views as disinformation and harassment, that power will come to an end.

So it should come as no surprise that the Biden administration is expressing similar. I'll be more cautious concerns about must Twitter takeover as well. Here was white house, press secretary, Jen, Saki, reacting the other. And just a quick one on 

the breaking news, Twitter, agreeing to let Elon Musk purchase and make this purchase.

Do you have a response to that? And does the white house have any concern that this new agreement might have president Trump back on the platform? I'm not going to comment on a specific transaction. What I can tell you as a general matter, no matter who owns or runs Twitter the president has long been concerned about the power of large social media platforms.

What they have that power they have over our everyday lives has long argued that tech platforms must be held accountable for the harms they cause. He has been a strong supporter of fundamental reforms to achieve that goal, including reforms to section two 30. And 

so that wasn't the only time Saki mentioned section two 30, either he or she is responding to a question, which I believe is from our dear friend Philippine.

And we would support taking including reforming section two 30, enacting antitrust reforms requiring more transparency. And the president is encouraged by the bipartisan support for or engagement in those efforts. 

So why the sudden interest in reforming section two 30 now that Elon Musk is set to take control of Twitter.

Now, in fairness, the interest is actually not sudden, Biden has long held that section two 30 should be eliminated. He previously said, quote, section two 30. It should be revoked immediately, should be revoked. Number one for Zuckerberg and for other platforms. So confusingly Democrats have managed to bring many Republicans on board with this idea of changing or getting rid of section two 30, no less than authority than former president.

Donald Trump has railed against two 30 at a Georgia rally a year ago. He said that we have to get rid of section two 30, or we won't have a country. And in fact, Republicans who support getting rid of section 2 38. They're getting played by Biden, Saki, et cetera, because without section two 30, social media would become even more hostile to conservative speech.

And many viewers are probably asking right now, okay. What even is section two 30. So allow me to explain section two 30 is a federal statute that protects internet platforms from some speech related liability. For instance, if I say something defamatory in this video, I can be sued just like anyone else, but YouTube cannot be sued because section two 30 treats me rather than YouTube as the speeding.

So the reasons for having this law are I think fairly obvious if YouTube, Twitter or Facebook, we're legally responsible for all speech on the platform. Then they would have to moderate way more aggressively. Maybe only people with blue check marks would get to post. It will maybe you'd have to fill out an application and prove that you wouldn't post content that could get the platform in trouble.

Something like that. Section 2 38 creates the legal regime that permits the internet to exist as it does right now, without gatekeepers reviewing posts or videos before they appear on the platforms. Now, of course I disagree with many of the individual content moderation decisions that the platforms make, people are not wrong to complain that the moderation has been to.

So that's interesting. It seems he's pointing out that it's almost like a double-edged sword here is if you do so I guess, as he just explained to section two 30, basically says that Facebook can not be held liable. If you say some stupid shit on their platform and get in trouble for it, it's not like you are writing it. I don't know. What's a good example of that. It's not it's not like they're going to ever be held liable for a situation where you did something wrong. They're a, they're just a platform for you to do your work on it's if you wrote S Hit-list on Google docs.

Like Google is not going to be sued for that hit list. It seems like a pretty ridiculous idea. But when you start to break it down, there is some valid points to this where it says basically the idea is that they're trying, they're going to hold Twitter, liable, hold Elan, Musk liable. If they allow certain voices to be raised and to say certain things that they deem inflammatory, maybe that don't violate the law, but they deem inflammatory.

So then that would cause a chain reaction from the social media companies, where they would have to come in and begin heavily moderation for fear of backlash from the government or legal ramifications for things that their users are saying. In which case they would have. Incentive to begin mass bannings to begin silencing of people.

Like he said, almost make people verify who they are and this whole deal, which is interesting, because that is something that Elon Musk has said he wants to do with. Which has caused all people to have to verify their identity, to get a blue check mark, or to even be on the platform he's hinting towards.

It seems so which a lot of people have problems with. The idea is that it's supposed to be eliminating these Saudi Arabian, swarm bots, and it's supposed to be eliminating all of these trolls that are out there under the bridge talking about Q spirochetes and it's supposed to eliminate all of that.

And so that's something that Elon Musk has come out with, which is basically having to identify yourself on the internet with some sort of like driver's license. W which you don't even need to vote now, but you need it to sign up for Twitter. So there's a problem with that. For some people where the heat, there's becoming a more loss or more use tracking of identity and the things that you are in specifically saying and outcomes for those things.

If it's maybe not something they like, so that's one problem that comes up with that. So we'll watch another minute or so of this clip and then we'll move on. Cause I think this, the section two 30 conversation, this is an interesting one though, because it is, if that's their next move, if they see Elan buying Twitter for 44 billion, especially with the elections coming up maybe they're starting to scramble. So they move their Rook to, Five. So they're trying to figure out what, what plays do we have as a response to this? Because this is not good for, this is not something we expected is the idea, right?

Because if all of the information that's on the surface level of this, imagine what is actually going on behind the scenes, because Elan, isn't just frivolously doing this for some overarching bold idea of freedom right there. There's probably even if that is the reason he in his intellect is going to break that down to a far more complex reasoning underneath that as to why it's not just going to be for freedom of speech, right?

Because he must have a very deeper perspective on the ramifications of that, not being the way that things are that I would be interested to hear, not just the, general tweet that it's for the greater good of humanity. If it is, I would love to hear. A longer form conversation as to why, because if that is the case, great, good on you.

I really appreciate it. And I think that if nothing else is and that there's the was something we'll get into next is the hero or villain conversation. But even if he is, somebody, the question and then there's questionable ties and family histories, and some things like that this still points the needle back in our direction, right?

In the direction of freedom of speech and the direction away from liberal extremism and in ideologies about stifling free speech platforms it is still for the greater good, no matter what his intentions are, which could be, scraping the intellectual data of billions and billions of human thoughts that are all in a singular place at one time for the last 10 plus years.

To then download into a chip that he is able to create AI with and then put into your brain that takes over the world. Even if it's just for that, it's still good for now. It's still good. In the short-term that we get to actually have a platform that's freedom of speech based, even if the outcome is destruction and death, which it always does anyways.

So I know I digress. So section two 30, let's watch another minute or two of this, and then we'll move on. 

He handed, we have countless examples of that, but getting rid of section two 30, wouldn't fix that problem. In fact, it would make it much, much worse because there would have to be much more approving of what posts are appearing now, political figures like Biden and.

I think they realize that, which is why they do want to see the law abolished without section two 30 companies like Facebook and Twitter, they'd have to carefully screen content. They purged problematic posts, which of course means purging more of the kind of posts that they already pursue aggressively, which is exactly what the Biden administration wants.

They want more purging of content that they don't agree that relates to COVID. And other things of that nature, there's no doubt they want it even more desperately. Now that Elon Musk is taking over Twitter and we'll possibly have a different regime and allow more, more free speech kind of content.

So there'll be no better way to throttle this new Twitter that Musk is creating than to subject it to endless frivolous lawsuits that are currently kept at bay by section two 30 as Steve Del Bianco of net choice, a tech trade association, put it the biggest threat to Elon Musk. Vision of a less moderate Twitter is section two 30 reform, which is why it's not surprised at all to hear Jen Psaki mentioning it repeatedly the other day.

All right. So I get that. I think we get to just to that, to me, it's just something that, it's a card that they're trying to wave that they have. I think they're trying to show that they're not being one-upped by a single man, which they are at least that's the mainstream question here.

So beyond that let's dive a little bit further into this Elon Musk conversation. Cause it's a really interesting discussion. Once you get a little bit deeper into it and you start to dive into some of the concerns of people, like the thing that I just mentioned there, which is the idea that you know, Elon Musk.

So he had a few tweets here about the the purchase and about the competition that he is currently seeing between his platform and truth social. So he points out here that truth, social, which he says in parentheses is a terrible name. And so again, Elon Musk says that truth, social. Parentheses is a terrible name that exists because Twitter censored free speech.

And that is the reason alone, according to Elon Musk. And then he goes on to show in the tweet before that truth social is beating Twitter in downloads and is the most highest ranked app on the app store right now for free app. Now it's funny to me that Elon Musk is still not saying it in a negative way, true social really.

Isn't a great name. I saw another person comment on there. Something about how retreat thing, which is like a thing where you can do. And I am on true social as of like yesterday or today. So red pill revolt on truth, social. If you're on there at red pill, revolt, go give me a follow. I'll be posting all my stuff on there, excited about that.

I will probably have a Twitter too, and just link the two. But but I do think there's a use case for both. And so yeah, Elan must speaking out saying how Twitter is being beat out by true social right now, which according to Elon Musk is a terrible name, which he said should have been changed to a trumpet instead, which would have been an awesome name.

I think a trumpet instead of true social was definitely the move, but they, unfortunately Donald Trump, wasn't able to consult Elon Musk's marketing team on this one. But definitely a great name trumpet. Maybe he should change it to it. Just to jump on the craziness train here. That'd be hilarious if we woke up tomorrow and it was called trumpet, but anyways, so there is a weirdness to this.

And then I guess the weirdness to me is the fact that truth, social and Elon Musk purchasing Twitter. So truth, social opening up to the general public and Elon Musk purchasing Twitter basically essentially happened on the same exact day. What are the odds of that? Two of the two singular. Opportunities or shifts within the social media history in the last decade or two, right?

Like what has happened in the last two decades that are in the last decade? That has been a bigger shift than true social coming out with the president of the United States, coming out with his own social media app. That was, is huge. There's millions of people on it right now, and a bunch more joining it as we speak as it's the number one app on the app store.

What are the odds that, that opening up and a billionaire iron man, like figure within our society purchasing Twitter on the same exact day, what are the odds of that? And so there's a whole idea surrounding this and some I'm sure we'll see better, and better thoughts come out surrounding this process and why these things are happening.

But what I got for you right now is that it's a, some people are saying it's an effort. So Trump basically came out and said that he was not going to have a Twitter account. He said, I am sticking with truth, which is weird because he's not actually even using it. And if you know how much Trump loves Twitter, it's weird that he's not jumping on the opportunity here.

So the idea is that there's something going on here and that this is all it just seems like a big play, right? It seems like these things that the coincidence is too ridiculous. It makes no sense to me that both of the two biggest things to happen in the social media world literally happened on the same day.

No chance at all. Cause this should have been horrible for true social. Which is almost maybe speaks to the idea that it's. The people are probably more fed up with this shit than they are willing to go crawling back to Twitter because daddy Ilan bought it. There. They're more like, fuck you.

I'm going to this one because it's even more like they, they believe in truth, social and Trump than more than they do in the Elon Musk at this point. And I think that's shows where we're at as a society and how divisive we've gotten to it, to where it's we don't want your life raft. We want an entirely different country to take the boat from.

We don't even want anything to do with you guys anymore. We're going to go over here. We're going to, we're going to go to where we don't have to deal with, th to have to deal with the opportunity of somebody having even the access to do because true social is an open platform. All of the coding is available.

You can look through it so you can see anytime there's changes, it's open. So if they change anything and you can see in the algorithms that they're starting to shadow banned people, you can see these changes. So the idea is that prevents them from doing things that would make you fucking hate them.

It seems fairly straightforward. So the true social app is open source Twitter, as it speaks right now is not Eli. My sassy lady wants to take it there. How many of these things will be able to implement? It will be, there'll be interesting to see, but he has taking it private so he can do a lot of these things without having to worry about board members or shareholders in the FBI or the FEC, federal exchange commission, FEC F CC.

I don't know, whichever one came out and said that they were not going to step in because some, some organization called crew came out and spoken and asked the FEC. To basically block Elon Musk from purchasing Twitter. And they said, what bitch, we're not doing that. That's not our job.

That's not what we're supposed to be doing. That has nothing to do with us. This is what the, what, this is financial outcomes. This is how this works. So now the next interesting part of that is, is that to me, it's there's, so there's a few little things that I've seen floating out there around conspiracies as to why this happens.

A decent amount of people are saying that the. Not for the betterment of humanity that Elon Musk's coming out and saying, these things is an all a show because he's a billionaire elite and his mom had ties to, I don't know some type of like Saudi Arabian deals. I don't know if I've seen people speak up on his mom's ties to the deeper, darker, deep state.

And then the fact that Elon Musk took billions in or millions in grants to start as companies from the government that he just so happened to get. And then there was things about Elon Musk saying that he believed in a he believed in the idea of a universal, basic income. And so there was a an image that I had that basically pointed out all of the things that pointed Elon Musk to having similar belief systems as the world economic forum.

And that's a scary thought, right? Like he, I have not seen any pointing to him in his association with the world economic forum. However, there is ideas that his mom was tied in with the, the deep state or whatever. But I don't know. I'm an Elon Musk fan boy I think he's, he's I think he might be sent back from the future and the fact that Wernher Von Braun the NASA.

And I said Nassi because he's a Nazi, a literal Nazi who was tried during Nuremberg trials, who is brought over to the United States under operation paperclip wrote a fiction book about a man who took and colonized the, or colonized Mars. And his name was Elon Musk. Without the mosque, it was just Ilan.

It would've been way crazier if it was Elon Musk, but he wrote ever Wernher Von Braun, the Nazis scientists that we brought over under operation paperclip. I wrote a fiction book like during the fifties about a man who took the human race to colonize Mars. And that's exactly what Ulan must does. So there's just some weird put on your tinfoil hat, things that are going on here.

That makes me question, what is actually happening with the Elon Musk situation. And should we be questioning him more than we are currently, should we be asking more questions about his history and should we not just be wholeheartedly diving into the idea that he's the white Knight coming in to save the day?

I don't know. I it's very easy to just, fan boy about Elon Musk. He's a very smart man. Obviously he's built many companies. He has a very much more career very much more charisma, so much more charisma. He has a lot more charisma than then the other billionaire that I've seen and going on Joe Rogan, his long conversations that he's had, the whole smoking weed thing during the Joe Rogan podcast and on his stock tumbling, and then going up better than, but like, how do you not be a fan of this man?

And when you get to this point in society where everything is questionable, right? Everything deserves a question first before you take it in wholeheartedly, it makes you want to still question him. And sometimes I think you just, you can't be too quick to eat your own, right? Because if this is it's just, it's hard to differentiate what is truth and what is a setup? And who's manipulating what, and but I think in this case, like I said, last time, $44 billion to purchase something as is a fair buy in of my trust. Especially if you say, if it's for the freedom of speech now, where it gets squirrely is what I mentioned before is that he also so happens to run a program called neuro link.

And he also happens to believe that's going to lead to AI symbiosis with humankind. And if you want it to do that, and you want it to build that AI, you would probably want the single largest data points of human consciousness than anywhere else in the world. And that might help you along a little bit.

And you could do that by buying Twitter and buying every single data point. Now I'm sure you could ask.

Get the data off of Twitter, at least majority of it without paying $44 billion. Like I'm sure some type of coding genius could like back it up into a hard drive and steal everything for less than that. So maybe there's that because it's more about having to steer the ship, I guess that makes a little bit more sense to me.

The idea is that he's taking it to scrape the data to turn it into AI. That is then going to turn us into the slaves of a bunch of, circulating Dyson vacuums with knives. And we're just going to, clean their floors instead of their them cleaning ours. The idea is that eventually they're going to take over the world, and it's going to be Elon Musk fault because he bought Twitter. Now that seems pretty farfetched. And I think that the explanation that I had earlier, which is the fact that he has a. He, he has a 10 step idea about where this goes from here if left uncorrected. And I think that he may be trying to correct those things before they happen.

But time will tell, is he the hero? Is he the villain? I don't know, but I do know that he admitted to believing that socialism was a good way. He also admitted to wanting a universal, basic income. He also said that he wanted, he believed that AI would eventually, basically take over human lives and that we would basically morph into a human AI symbiotic relationship with the world.

This all this craziest than this too. So I don't know, but it seems to me. Like I'm still in Ilan fanboy. So I don't know what your opinion is, but feel free to let me know at red pill revolt on Instagram would love to hear from ya. All right. So let's go ahead and check out the next thing here, which is going to be the last topic.

And that is about the mayor. Cause I don't know what that is, but this is off of Fox news and it discusses somebody testifying that the department of Homeland security is creating a disinformation governance board. And that's what we were talking about before where she actually, I guess that's the video that we watched, which is them discussing the idea that they're going to so I'll read this article to you.

It says re Lauren Underwood cited reports on how minority communities are being targeted and then misinformation campaigns and asked mayor coz what DHS will do to. Mayor Casa disinformation, a disinformation governance board had recently been created and would be led by under secretary for policy Rob Silver's co-chair with principal, deputy general counsel Jennifer Gaskell.

It says in quotes, the goal is to bring the resources of the department of Homeland security together to address this threat. Adding that the department is focused on the spread of disinformation in minority communities. And Fox news has reached out to the DHS seeking more information on the disinformation governance board hours later.

Political reported that Nina Janka wicks, who previously served as a disinformation fellow at the Wilson center will head the board as executive director. Then it shows a tweet. It says cat's out of the bag. Here's what I've been up to the past two months and I've been quiet. GENCO it's tweeted honor to be serving in the Biden administration at DHS gov and helping shape our counter, this information efforts.

They literally made a ministry of truth. They just did it. They came up with the department of Homeland security, came out with a counter disinformation campaign or a counter disinformation. It, what in the world where have we gotten a governance board of the truth? The ministry of truth is here folks, a disinformation governance board under the Biden administration.

How is this, like I read at the beginning of the pandemic, I read 1984. And maybe I'm the reason for all of this. How many times is I if I would have never read that book with these things not be happening because it seems like we're getting so close, like how is a governing body? Are you able to dictate and determine what is truthful and what is not truthful?

What is fact and what is fiction? What is the right opinion to hold on a topic? And what is disinformation? What is harmful, right? What is harmful disinformation now in the, in that, in line with the With the terrorism advisory bulletin that we discussed, like three, four or five episodes ago that they dropped basically stating if you so dissent within the government or make people have a difficulty agreeing with the government if you're like somebody who speaks out against them, that they can label you a terrorist, which is allows them to do all sorts of things under the Patriot act.

Disgusting. So to me, I don't know where this is going. I want to see the best in this situation and just be happy with the fact that we have somewhere to go. We not only one place, but two places. And I think we're seeing the public choosing right now with the fact that truth, social is number one on the app store which direction, w whether or not we wholeheartedly are buying into the idea of Twitter or not.

But time will tell, I guess we'll see what happens with the stock of Twitter. We'll see what changes actually are implemented. Cause that's a question too, right? Is he actually going to follow through on these things? But why would you spend $44 billion if you weren't going to anyways. So thank you guys for listening.

If you want to stick around with me here, head over to the patreon, just patreon.com/red pill revolt. And we're going to discuss a couple things here which is going to be Joe Biden discussed in the quotes that the ruble has been reduced to rubble which was sad that when it was at a dollar 34, the sanctions were announced and then dropped down very low and today, guess she'll have to stick around to see. Go head over to patreon.com/red pill. Revolt, go ahead and subscribe. Click that button right there. Follow me on Instagram. Follow me on the truth. Social at red pill, revolt. Go ahead and subscribe on YouTube. You'll see. Start to see a bunch of clips that are coming out.

A full video podcast is on patreon.com/rep hill revolt, including the bonus content, which is coming up next, which we are about to discuss. So thank you so much for listening. I hope you have a great day and welcome to the revolution. Thank you so much.

In this week's episode of Red Pill Revolution, we discuss the recently released Watch the Water documentary which claims that we have all been secretly poisoned with king cobra snake venom disguised as a virus through our water supply; We also discuss Twitter going broke because they went woke, Musk still attempting to save the free world and buy Twitter and the difficulties he is running into and also the federal travel mask mandate being dropped! All of that and more on this week's episode!

On this week's Patreon-only bonus content, we discuss Wiki-leaks releasing Hunter Bidens full laptop contents, Julian Assange being extradited, BP gaslighting the entire world, and more! You can add the bonus RSS feed right to your favorite podcast player!

The Patreon begins at only $5 and includes weekly bonus topics, full video episodes, and more!

Sign up now at:

https://Patreon.com/redpillrevolt

For all the articles, videos, and documents discussed on this week's podcast join our substack! 

Podcast Companion Substack: https://redpillrevolution.substack.com ----more----

Please consider leaving a donation for all of the hard work that goes into this ad-free podcast. I love doing what I do and can only continue through your generosity and support! 

Donate https://givesendgo.com/redpillrevolution 

Full Transcription:

Welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams. Red pill revolution started out with me realizing everything that I knew, everything that I believed, everything I interpreted about my life is through the lens of the information I was spoonfed as a child, religion, politics, history, conspiracies, Hollywood medicine, money, food, all of it, everything we know was tactfully written to influence your decisions and your view on reality by those in power.

Now I'm on a mission, a mission to retrain and reeducate myself to find the true reality of what is behind that curtain. And I'm taking your ass with me. Welcome to the rebel.

Hello, and welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams, and thank you so much for joining me today. This is episode number 25 of the red pill revolution podcast, and we have some very interesting stuff to get into today. The things that we're going to touch today are going to range anything from Joe Biden being directly.

By the Easter bunny himself. Yeah. You heard that, right. And then we're going to talk about the dropped recently dropped federal mandate surrounding masks, which is a big, big win for freedom. Now that our oppressors have allowed us not to have to have our face covered all of the time. If we want to have the privilege of going somewhere across this great nation, we're also going to touch on where the is at currently with Elon Musk and Twitter.

We're going to talk about the four, the per cent increase in overall death in the ages of 19 to 40 years old. I really can't begin to fathom the implications of that. But I'm sure we all can conclude maybe potentially why there's been a 40% increase in overall deaths in the ages of 19. Just in the last two years, and this is a life insurance study we're also going to discuss briefly the watch the water documentary, which was also quite deep and concerning.

And I have some questions. I have some reservations. I have some observations that we will talk about during that as well. And then we're also going to discuss briefly the Netflix situation with Netflix dropping basically 30% overnight, which a lot of people are attributing to the woke agenda by Netflix, themselves.

So all of that more today, but the first thing I need you to do is go ahead and hit that subscribe button. It takes just a second of your day, and that means the world to. Every day, every day, we try and think of ways that we can give back to the world and give good karma, you know, get, get good karma back.

And in one way you can do that is by doing good things for others. And you can do something great for me right now that will come back around to you. I know it by just hitting that subscribe button for me. I would appreciate it so much. I worked very hard. And it means the world to me that you're even listening, let alone considering subscribing.

So go ahead and click that button right now. It takes two seconds out of your day. Makes a huge difference in your universal karma. Press that button right now. And if you could also leave a five-star review, I would appreciate it a lot that helps us basically get higher on the ratings pages. It also tells me that what I'm doing is valuable to you.

If you can take it just a minute to click that five-star button and even better, go ahead and read a review or write a review up there for me. Tell me what I'm doing. Great. Tell me the most ridiculous thing that you've ever learned from this podcast. One of the maybe crazier things that you've learned by going through these episodes, I would love to hear about it.

Go ahead and leave a review right now. Apple podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, wherever the hell you're at. Go ahead and do that for me. Now let's go ahead and jump into this first topic, which is going to be the Easter bunny himself now being in a better position to manage our country than our own president. It was Easter weekend.

And on on Sunday, Joe Biden went and spoke in front of a group of people and was basically ushered around by what seemed to be a, possibly like a secret service agent or I don't know who it was, but, but there's some, some funny, some funny thoughts on that. So let's go ahead and I'll walk you through the video here, if you're listening.

And we'll, we'll talk about it after. What you're going to see here is going to be Joe Biden on this fence, talking to some nice people and beginning to answer questions while the, the Easter bunny basically runs in front of him, waves his arms in front of the president of the United States.

Like he's a toddler who is about to jump off of a cliff so that he doesn't answer this individual's questions. Then I want to see that again. Let's see if we can get that back. So it was really funny to me. I think, I think my favorite viewpoint on this was the idea that it was not the Easter bunny that was doing this.

It was actually Barack Obama hidden in the Easter bunny costume. You know how there's all these conspiracies around how Barack Obama is in his third term. Just like you said, that he would do by the way, which is kind of eerie and weird that he mentioned that he would, you know, if I could have my way, he said, I don't have a very good Barack Obama impression.

If I could have my way, I would have a third. And do my third term. I would just have somebody else that pretended to be there for me, I'll have to find the clip to get the exact, to the exact information that he said there and maybe improve my Barack Obama voiceover. But it it's a hilarious, hilarious idea that Barack Obama himself dressed up as the Easter bunny to usher the president of the United States around and eliminate him from actually as answering questions from the general population that he should answer to technically.

Um, but who am I? Just a guy, right? So the next thing that we're going to touch on. It's going to be the mass mandate and this is pretty, I mean, it's pretty awesome and it's pretty sad that it's awesome. I think is the best way to put it. When, when your oppressor loosens the handcuffs, right.

I think is the best analogy for this. I'm sure there's a better one, but I think that's the best one I have on the, off the cuff right now. Oh, off the cuff. Good, good one. There I'm. So off the cuff, the best one I have is based on handcuffs and but, but I think it is, it's like they they, they, they backed us into this position where you literally were masking toddlers, who were, you were forced forcing Todd three year olds, three year olds to, to wear masks and, and have to be put in a situation where they're uncomfortable for hours on end with no scientific backing for the reason why at all, at all, not a single reason, not a single reason that a toddler should be wearing a mask and you force them to do there's many people like my family, I have children. Who we just didn't travel on the plane. We weren't going to do that. I would never put my, my three, two, whatever year old in a position where they have to wear a mask like that because I just think it's wrong. I think that it, it positions you in a place where you're going to end up in some, well, at least for me, I know I would end up in some sort of conflict if somebody tried to force that upon my child.

And it, it's just unbelievable to me that we have such Stockholm syndrome that when they loosened our cuffs and allowed us to not have to wear a piece of cloth over our face that we know did literally nothing all of a sudden it's a big party. Right? You see all the videos of the pilots coming on over the loudspeakers.

If you're, if you know the pilots that this was coming though, it's like a pilot's personality is, is a little interesting. I was air traffic control in the air force. So similar, similar site type of atmosphere there. But but the, the pilots that were coming on were just like kind of excited to go over the loudspeaker and excuse me just to let you guys know, the TSA has now told us that you no longer have to wear masks and yeah.

Enjoy your flight wins one 70. It's a, it's a, it's pretty cool to see that everybody is celebrating this. I haven't really seen very many negative videos surrounding this, which. You saw like flight attendants, walking down and dancing and singing music and like trying to get people to throw their masks.

So it's, it's pretty, it's, it's cool. But like I said, it's almost concerning that it's cool because it should have never been so in the first place, right. There's no reason I should have ever showed about implemented. It was unlawful. And hopefully I had somebody comment about kind of like what w where could we go legally from here?

I think that's an interesting conversation that we kind of have to have is because if there was a, if there is some sort of legal recourse if you were kicked off of a plane or put on a no fly list or forced to wear a mask while you had that's one thing that bothered me is like, even the medical exemptions, right?

Like now there's people who are going to take advantage of that, but there's always going to be people who take advantage of things, just because there's people who take advantage of things does not mean that you don't have to submit to them based on the Americas American disability act. Right. Like, just, just because there's going to be a Small few who take advantage of that.

Maybe it sound small for you, but fuck you. I don't have to wear a mask anyways. Right. Like, and, and how do you know, how can PIPA laws don't even allow you to know my medical history? Right? So there was people who were being shut out, people who are being not allowed on flights because they wouldn't wear a mask because they wouldn't violate HIPAA laws and tell a stewardess about their anxiety disorder or about their breather CLPD and all of these things that would affect them negatively to have to wear a mask.

There's literally no reason that we should have been in this situation to begin with. And it's so frustrating being a parent, knowing that for three years, almost we weren't able to travel that way because of some unlawful mandate given out by the, the, the powers that be the CDC and the TSA and the the whatever bullshit acronym you want to give.

Some, some power to it's just so frustrating. So I, I think it's cool. I think it's awesome. Let's go ahead and watch this video about the mass mandate so we can get a little bit more details on it, then we'll discuss it again. Real real briefly. Here, here it is out of Florida where a federal judge has just overturned the CDCs national mask mandate for planes and other forms of public transportation.

Joining me now is NBC news, justice correspondent, Pete Williams. So Pete will this, does this mean that everyone can take their mask off inside a plane or is there another step? Well, that's what the judge says. We're waiting to hear what the centers for disease control TSA and the FAA S. I doubt that planes in flight for example, know about this or that most airlines are even quite aware of what they're supposed to do now.

No comment yet from the justice department about what it will do, although I suspect that the government will seek a stay of this judge's order. So this is a federal judge in Tampa, Florida, who has ruled in a lawsuit, brought by a group called the health freedom defense fund, and two women who said that they didn't like wearing masks on a plane.

One of them said that her anxiety was aggravated by having to wear a face mask. And the other said the mask constricted breathing and provoked or exacerbated her panic attacks. And the judge has said two things here that the centers for disease control did not have the authority to issue this mask under the law that set up the CDC.

And secondly, but the federal government failed to go through all the necessary. In making a rule like this in seeking public comment. Now, the judge said, normally speaking, in a case like this, she would issue a ruling in favor only of the parties to the lawsuit. In other words, would not apply only to them, but the judge who is Katherine Kimball, Mizelle of Tampa said that's not possible that it would be hard to distinguish them from others.

And then she says if, if she were to try to limit it, how is the ride sharing driver, the flight attendant or the bus driver to know that somebody was a plaintiff to this lawsuit with permission to enter mass free, that just wouldn't work. So she has declared the mask mandate illegal. She has struck it down now as I said, I don't know what the government's going to do about this.

I would see, I would think they'd seek a stay of her ruling. This was the mass mandate. Of course, as you mentioned, applied to airplanes, trains buses, other kinds of mass transit. And in the case of airplanes, it's been extended several times because the government has said that it's been effective in helping to prevent the spread of COVID, but we just don't know what the federal government is going to do here.

I would certainly guess they'll try to put a stop to this and get, and get a stay while this is appealed. Pete, two years into the pandemic, though, with this mass mandate that has been in place for so long. Why the lawsuit now? Why would it get overturned now? Well, the lawsuit was actually filed last year.

It was filed last July. So it's been going through grinding its way through the court in the, in, in this before this judge who, by the way, issued this a decision without a trial on summary judgment based only on the arguments that were made in the written briefs. I think that may be another cause of concern here.

This this is going to be a very controversial ruling. It's going to be a victory for people who have hated the mass mandates, but the government seems to believe that they are effective.

All right. So that's enough of that guy. So, the, the point of it is it was struck down by a federal judge. They've gotten some heat for it. And what's even more interesting is that the white house is now coming back and saying that they're going to fight this. Like, Biden's now saying that he's going to push for this to be appealed and in, see if he can get this changed back.

Right. So what it was is they came out and said, we're gonna, we need two more weeks. Right. They extended us two more weeks. And then within those two weeks that they were extending it from the white house's perspective. This federal judge struck this down as a response to a group, the freedom, something you heard of in that video, who basically put in a lawsuit was saying that this is an unlawful mandate and is not constitutional.

And the judge agreed with. So now where we're at is basically that the Biden administration is now saying that they're even going to go back and fight this. Now, even on the, especially one thing people have pointed out is that sound in the election year, right? We're where his approval rating is so low already.

And now he's going to go against what majority of people believe should, should be the case and make a big push against people's right to their own body. So it's going to be interesting to see how that plays out. I think if anything else, it's good for the Republicans that this is even a conversation again, because it's gonna look really bad on Biden if he makes this push to eliminate or make mass mandated again, beyond what the federal government or judge ruled which is seemingly it shouldn't be his place, right?

I mean, if they make a ruling that's based off of the constitution not based off of the opinion of the woke mob which I think is an important distinction. However, one that. Don't seem to have our politicians make very often. Now the next conversation we're going to have us running, Elon Musk and Twitter.

So it's, it's been a tough week for Elon Musk. I mean, never, probably I wonder if I bet you every week's actually tough for him it seems like it wouldn't be with how rich he is, but I'm sure he has more responsibility and more weight on their shoulders than any of us can even imagine. I digress.

What I think it is going on here is, is basically the Twitter did something where they basically purged their shares, where they put out a big pump of, or going to, I don't know the exact case of it, but they're going to put out a bunch of new shares to dilute the overall value, which again, is, is leading them into a position where they could be given a lawsuit by their shareholders because they're not accomplishing their fiduciary responsibility, which basically means that they have a responsibility to their shareholders to do what's in the best interest of the company and to them.

And, and they're obviously not doing that when somebody offers far above what it was worth two weeks ago to buy the entirety of the company. And, and for the purpose, specifically of the reason of not wanting to give the anything Alonzo, like as Eve on the Elon, even the right, has he ever come out and said, he's a Republican?

Like, why is this, why is this so crazy that, that a billionaire wants to buy a social media outlet, right? Like like people were showing that. I think it was Bloomberg came out with articles, like raving raving, about how about how Jeff Bezos bought the Washington post and how it was great for democracy and how mark for the entrepreneurs of the world that they get a say in the political sphere and this whole thing.

Right. And, and, and now the second that Elon Musk another. It says that he wants to jump into the conversation around social media, because he feels like the freedom of speech hindrance is being taken too far right between these companies. Which again, I agree with fully as I sit here completely shadow banned on Instagram.

It will be one month to the day where I lost my entire Instagram platform tomorrow. So we'll see if the 30 day mark allows that shadow ban to fall off. And I hope it does. Cause I found some new, awesome ways to do some videos and do a lot more content for you guys. So look out for that. If you don't follow our Instagram, it's at red pill revolt on Instagram you can also check our new website.

I made it, I made a website over the last A couple of weeks trying to get off of these platforms a little bit and have a place for you guys to go. That's not specifically based on somebody allowing me to be there. So I built a website it's red pill, revolution dot C O M red pill, revolution dot C O.

And eventually I'll probably get the.com. I'm waiting on some response rooms. So anyways, I digress again. I'm digressing a lot. Yeah, go check out the website, red pill, revolution dot C O, which is kind of cool. Yeah. Anyways, let's move on. Elon Musk is trying to buy Twitter. They are diluting the shares and they're trying to stop him from doing so.

So here's a video on that. I believe it's from the hill. And we'll go ahead and watch that right now. And then again, we'll discuss it. Robbie, what's on your radar. Well, Elon Musk offer to buy the entirety of Twitter, turn it into a private company and correct what he feels is a waning commitment to the principles of free and open source.

Has drawn both praise and criticism. So many people who share Elan's to satisfaction with the platform, including Republicans and conservatives who think it discriminates against oops, Robbie, what's on your radar. So here it goes again. Let me, let me go hide. And Twitter turned it into a private company and correct what he feels is a waning commitment to the principles, order free and open.

Every indication that it sides with the traditional gatekeepers of information is inclined to fend off must bid. So the company adopted a poison pill approach late last week. This is a well-known corporate tactic intended to thwart a potential buyer. So in this specific case, Twitter would flood the market with additional shares available for sale.

If must stake in the company reaches 15% effectively Twitter plans to dilute his stake, making it much harder for him to reach the 51% threshold. Now, Twitter is ultimately interested in muscles. Well, this gives them more time to consider it and time as well to look for other potential buyers. So we have a pretty good idea of what the board of Twitter wants.

It wants to hold onto its power. They're offered to make musky member of the board was probably one board of a desire to control and quiet him as a board member. He would have an obligation to the company not to disparage it publicly and thus, he would no longer be able to tweet his thoughts about ways in which Twitter should be different, but that brings him to the real subject of this radar.

What exactly does Elon Musk want to change about Twitter? If we know that then we don't have to get into the thornier questions of which group of people do you like better, which governance structure do you think is preferable. Instead we can just quite literally evaluate the individual ideas for improving the platform.

Now, fortunately it must cause. And interview late last week, let's watch. Well, I think it's very important for that'd be an inclusive arena for free speech where, so yeah,

Twitter has become kind of the de facto town square. It's just really important that people have the, both the the reality and the perception that they are able to speak freely within the bounds of the law. And know, so one of the things that I believe Twitter should do is open-source the algorithm and make any changes to people's tweets.

If they're emphasized or deemphasized that action should be. It made apparent. So anyone can see that that action has been taken. So there's, there's no sort of behind the scenes manipulation, either algorithmically or manually later on in that interview, Musk articulated support for a feature of many people have demanded a Twitter edit button.

So you could alter a tweet after you send it book has this function. So it's workable in some sense, there's a little note that appears showing that you edited. It must also talked about removing ads for premium subscribers, providing other perks for those willing to pay more. He also wants to eliminate spam and scam bots, and he's even given some indication.

He thinks some tweets should be longer, should not be bound by the character count. Now, in my view, many of these ideas, they have merit more transparency. It would be a massive improvement. It's critical for the people to know why and how the platform decides to reward and punish them. So the ultimate goal should be to devolve content, moderation to users, instead of Twitter, deciding for you what it thinks you ought to see what it thinks is dangerous or what it thinks is.

So one thing that I think is interesting about that is, is the approach that Elan's talked about, where, where he basically says that he believes that it is absolutely necessary to the survival of humanity, that there is freedom of speech and the survival of democracy. Right? That's a very fair statement to make.

I think that Elon Musk is like literally the, the, the, if there was like a legitimate, real world, iron man. I think, I think it's Elon Musk it's, it's, it's great to see that there is somebody who represents the general public, somebody who is, is in our corner at least feels like they are. And maybe that's a reason to question that I I've seen some people say that Elon Musk is like a shill or whatever.

And I, I do think that it is a an interesting conversation to be had around anytime. There is somebody, but I also think it's like to the conditioning of, of where we're at as a society where we just can't trust anybody, even when they're willing to spend $41 billion in the pursuit of the freedom of speech and truth.

I think that's a fair buy-in of your trust. Like if he's willing to spend a fair amount of, of the entire world's forge. And ensuring that you have the right to talk shit on Twitter, about everything that you want to. I think that's a fair buy-in of my trust. To me, I, I don't have very many suspicions of Elon Musk.

I think that he's shown fairly clearly that he has at least in most cases, the general populations best interest in mind, maybe not when it comes to neuro link or putting microchips in people's brains. If we were going to have somebody who does it, I would rather it be him than bill gates. So there's that.

So I hope that this goes through. I really do. And, and, and if not, it's going to be a really sad day for the freedom of speech and another, another blocking of, of, of the ability for us to speak out. And if you recall what happened with parlor, right? I think that we need to revisit that we need to look back on what our oppressors did to us.

Just a year or two, two years ago, year and a half ago now where they completely de platformed parlor at every stage, along the way from. The de platforming of them not allowing the, basically Amazon, their servers even pulled away from them. The app store made it so you couldn't get on there after a certain amount of time after a certain amount of users signed on, because they were so afraid of what was going to come, if you were able to speak out against their hypocrisy and, and, and their deceitful ways.

Right. So it's, it's, we're seeing it again, right. Twitter and the powers that be BlackRock, Vanguard, whoever it is. I think it's, I think it's Vanguard maybe BlackRock that owns or owns a very large percentage of Twitter that just bought more shares in order to be the primary stakeholder. I don't know if that's led to a bid war of any type recently with the Elon Musk.

But we have seen that LMS said that he would be coming out with a counter response to what is going on here within like 10 days Time will tell, we'll see, is Elon Musk going to be able to take over Twitter? I hope so now I'm not a big Twitter. I don't even have a Twitter. I, if Elon Musk gets on there and owns it, I think I would just have to, because you kind of have to support that.

I, I'm not a huge fan of like the short form, text content. Just think it's boring and I like shooting videos and maybe I'll find a use case for that on Twitter. But as of right now, I do not have a Twitter, but if Elon Musk owns Twitter, I'm definitely going to go get on Twitter. I think it's just, just to show my support there.

So I, I really do hope that Elon Musk is able to take over Twitter. I think that it would be not only a good day for democracy, but also it would check the check. Those who believe they're so protected in their positions. The ministry of truth like the 1984 or Wesleyan belief system that they have their best, your best interest in mind.

And you're too stupid to think for yourself. And there's no way, freedom of speech of all these heathens out there who disagree with me on these topics should be able to actually express their opinions, right? Like the, the Justin Trudeau there's a small fringe minority who has opposing opinions and they are expressing them.

Uh they're they're so scared. Right? And, and again, as I said, last, last time, it just shows you how weak their arguments are and how, how S how weak they are and how scared they are of just words. Right? And, and they're scared of you having a platform to talk about them truthfully and not be able to silence you as a result.

And so it will be a great day if that follows through. And now, now here's one that I think. It is going to be a, an interesting side of it. So it's like the w the other reason that Twitter wants this platform is because then they can point the laser pointer, right? Like, if it's like the we went from the, the, I got jabbed Facebook overlay on your picture to the Ukrainian flag next to it.

Like when, when Instagram or Twitter or whoever it is just points a laser pointer at the next woke idea that the, the, the liberal infestation, licks their their, their paws, and then just scurries after the next thing that they can identify with and feel like they're better than everybody else.

And so it's not just silencing opinions. It's, it's directing a thought from their party and eliminating thoughts from your. And assuming that you're on the side of not the side of the woke mob of Twitter, or maybe you are. And if you're listening to this kudos to you for listening to an alternate opinion than what you normally would.

But I highly doubt it, but if you are thanks, I appreciate it. I'm always happy to have, here are the other side of things and we would always be open for a conversation. But anyways, I, I do think it's important and I do think it's important that not only do we allow the human, the human brain, the human organism as a whole to, I, I just think that when, when left be the human organism, the human mind, the human hive generally moves towards goodness, right?

There is a small fringe minority, and those that small fringe minority is the ones that are directing our consciousness towards these negative environments and these negative conversations and these terrible things for our children and, and these the, the, the, it, it, it just, there's, there's a small group that.

Trying to effect effectively taint the water of human consciousness. And, and they're so scared of you taking away their ability to do that and into allow the human hive mind to, to point it's, it's almost like a religious conversation. I had somebody comment that because I asked a question I posed it in one of my, the last episode, which is like, what, what is that right?

Like what, what is the human need for truth, right? What, what is inside of us that makes us want to, to speak out when we hear things that are being said that are not true, that we see these deceitful individuals in positions of power, trying to control the masses. What is that drive like? It has to, it's not a PR, it's not an animalistic drive, right?

It's not, there's not monkeys who are like shouting from the mountaintops that the other monkeys are lying to the masses. Like it's, it's a consciousness, it's a second layer, it's a prefrontal cortex issue. And we, we have to explore it from the sense that There, there is humans when left to themselves are generally good, but when directed by, by those who are, who are insistent upon tainting the water.

And, and that's an interesting analogy to you is with what we're going to watch here in a few minutes with the watch the water documentary. But it w when you take away their ability to taint the water, they're so afraid of that human hive mind going towards goodness, right? Going towards positivity and, and, and realizing that we're all just literally a sliver of the same divinity, like to take the words of Marcus a really us, like we are all cut from the same cloth.

We are there, there's so many different analogies that you can use, but we are all that same sliver of divinity. And we have just been thrust into different bodies and then different family situations and in different households with different parents and different upbringings. And, and, but, but at the end of the day, we are the same.

Right. We are the same. We are human. We are, we are a part of this individualistic, like a perception of a greater high of mind of consciousness. And if you look at life from that perspective, you start to view the people who are on the other side is just like you, right? Like, like, yeah. The way that I view, like when people are so like involved in the mask stuff and so involved in, like everybody should get vaccinate.

It's like they are the victims more than you were. I, they were, they've been taken advantage of, they are. They're the ones who are naive enough to believe these these lines. And so you shouldn't demonize the individual. They are just you in a different position, but they're just more agreeable potentially, or they're just more naive or they're just more willing to be manipulated by these people.

Or they gave them more credit than they should have. And now they've been deceived into a point where they believe they have your best interest in mind. And that's maybe not everybody, there's definitely some assholes who were out there just being decks because they think they're better than everybody.

But even those people, like there's a reason that they're there in that position, acting like that. And it's generally not because they want to do what the, the, the the, a ruling. Class is hoping for, which is push us towards totalitarianism and giving them more power. They're just trying to go through life and, and just so happened to be thrust into the river of propaganda that eventually led them to believe that you were killing people with your breath.

It's like, how paranoid do you have to believe it, to be it to believe that that's a reality. Right. And in a high too, like at the beginning of the pandemic, right? Let's, let's take it. The backstop, like the beginning of the pandemic. I literally wanted my wife to go to the grocery store with gloves on, like I was taking this seriously.

I wasn't just like laughing at this stuff frivolously and. Giving it no merit, what, before we knew what we knew before we knew the PCR tests were being manipulated before we knew that the, the numbers are being inflated with comorbidities before we knew that they were throwing people with COVID into nursing facilities in hopes of leading to a higher death rate.

Before we knew CNN came out with the bar on the side of it and admitted the literally the only reason they had the death count up on the CNN newscast was to instill fear in you because it drove more views. How gross, how disgusting. Right before all of that, before we knew those things, I was scared to.

And if you were following what was going on, you probably should have been also like if you, I remember watching like world counter.org or something like that. And it just, it had its own death count. And I remember watching it before CNN and before everybody else really jumped onto it before it was this like big mass hysteria.

I remember following it pretty closely and pretty seriously. And to a point where, when it was at its peak, you know, to where we, none of this information came out, I was scared for my family and, and, and would have went to seemingly to somebody else, irrational lengths to ensure that my family was safe from these things.

And so it, I could have very well been in that position too. And, and so to realize that it's not the individuals that are on the other side, it's not the general population and it's not the civilians that are out there. It's not the, it's the it's those who are working the proverbial Puppet whatever.

I wonder if there's a word for that. It's probably a good analogy to know that the thing you hold when you have a puppet, right? The puppet masters, right. We know that those are the people who have ill intentions. Those are the people that we should be concerned about. Those are the people, the masses should be talking about that the same people who stifled the antiwar movement in the seventies, because it's a machine it's because it's all about money.

And so when you realize that you should not be looking at the, your neighbor with a Ukraine flag, which was pretty stupid, right? To be honest, although I wonder how crazy it would be. If I put up a Russia flag, can you imagine how quickly your house would get AGD? If you had a Russia flag up? I kind of do want to do that low.

Like literally just go in the middle of a city and have a sign that goes Russian lives matter and like, see how many people get mad and yell at you without any reasoning as to why. It would be, it would be an interesting interview and conversation to, to get into with some people, because I think you get very many people who are mad at you, none of which actually have a legitimate reason as to why.

And of course, Russian lives do matter. Right? You want to use that slogan. They do. Right. And so it would, it would cause mass hysteria though, if you had a Russia flag on your house or you, you went to the middle of the town square with a Russian lives matter poster it would be a really interesting thought experiment to see people's reactions.

Anyways so, the point of all that is that. Don't don't demonize the individual, right? Realize that that individual could just have very well been you and they just haven't had the same access to information or the same personality that you had to drive your search for the truth and took everything the oppressor told them at face value without questioning it or without really following up on it.

And now there are some assholes for sure. There's absolutely some assholes who think that they're better than you, who generally put their I'm vaccinated flex picture on Facebook or whatever it is. But there's definitely some assholes out there, but majority of people who are on the other side of you just want to keep safe and, and, and just are following the information of the individuals that they believe are worthy of them following.

And didn't have the. Mind to second, guess them and to question them and to look up the information that opposes them and to ask the right questions and look for the right information that may lead to you, finding out what the real truth is. I think that a lot of people just go straight to demonizing somebody and you shouldn't do that.

You should, you should always be open to having a conversation. You should always be willing to look at the other side and put your hand across the fence and shake a hand and maybe ask them a little bit why, because that's the only way that we get to a point where things are positive again. And obviously we've seen that the point of all of this from their perspective is the diverse or the divisiveness that has come from these last few years.

That is the point. That is the goal of all of this is divisiveness and at least a portion of it. And if he realized that we're literally giving them what they want by demonizing people. So, quick. Without question or without without putting yourself in a position to actually engage in a real conversation with that person that may turn out to be very positive and makes you question your, your narrative too, because you should be open and willing to change your opinions too.

Right? If you, if you would expect that of somebody else, you should be on the same, the same side of that to, to allow that for yourself too. So on the backs of that, here is a video where we will watch about this talking about people, posting their vaccine on Facebook flexing with their bandaid, from the, the McDonald's they went to, to get injected with an experimental drug.

Here is an individual from Canada who I believe it's from Canada, who said that there was an overall 40% increase in death rates in people from the ages of 19 to 40, specifically in the last year. And that is. Very terrifying statistic, and one that we can't fake because they had to make life insurance payout.

So the, accurate, the information on this is completely accurate and can not be fudged and, and, and will not allow the mainstream narrative to position them the position, the, the information in a way to where it's not showing the truth, because these companies are being costs millions of dollars, millions, and millions of hundreds, of millions, of dollars on the backs of these deaths of these young and healthy individuals who have died over the last several years.

So they have the data and this is what the data says.

No one is saying with any certainty, Jason, what is causing this, but we certainly would be remiss as scientists. If we didn't look at that and say, there is something going on, what happened in 2021 that was so different from the previous five-year average, that would cause this massive increase in certain medical conditions.

So the, the, the, the source of the information is several us life insurance companies that have been reporting this correct. And these three career physicians. Yes, there are separate groups of data. Jason, the previous study from the U S life insurance companies. Many of them were reporting a 40% increase in deaths from all causes in the 18 to 49 year old group.

They know that because these are life insurance companies that provide group life insurance policies to employers. So these are working age individuals with a 40% increase in all costs. That was a different report from this bombshell that came out last week from, as I said, three career military physicians and the question is what, what has changed in calendar year 2021 that is causing number one, an increase in all cause deaths as reported by the life insurance companies and an increase in certain medical conditions, such as heart attacks, what clots to the lungs congenital malformations of children born that year, female infertility and those sorts of things.

Did these three career military physicians offer any type of speculate? They did not. And they, but they did not do this anonymously. They signed an affidavit on this. I have not seen the raw data. I'm not a military physician. I don't have access to that database, but I don't have any reason to believe at this juncture that the data is in question.

These are again, based on ICD codes and it should, I should make it clear because it's very easy to make statistics of these sorts. Deceptive. So what I say that there's a 300% increase, for example, in cancers is what they found. This wasn't an increase from one case to four cases. In the case of cancer, for example, it was an increase from an average, a five-year average of 38,000 cases per year to almost 120,000 cases in calendar year 2021.

And. Wow. So that's, that's pretty crazy and pretty alarming too, is, is the idea that, that it's not just a small margin, right? It's not, like she said, it's not one person dying from cancer going to a hundred people dying or even 50 or 30 or 10 it's, 38,000 or whatever. The number was going to a hundred thousand, like, oh, crazy, unbelievable.

Drastic difference in the last year for cancer deaths of the age of 19 to 40, like how, what are the odds of that? Right? What are the odds of that? And what changed since 2020 that made it like, what is a medical large medical big rollout push of the medical industrial complex that has come out and basically invited every single person, not even just invited, manipulated and, and pressured and bullied.

Young healthy individuals to get a vaccine that they didn't need to get a experimental MRI and a drug put into their body that we know none of the effects of what would absolutely. That's a causation they're like, I guess you can't exactly say causation until it's proven, but is a very, very interesting correlation that F F like 40% overall deaths, 19 to 40.

And when you think about the most deaths from 19 to 40, like, I wonder what the actual statistics are on that. Like, what is the average what are the most common deaths for younger individuals, like most common reasons for death in, in 19 to 40 years old? I think it would be interesting to see, and I bet you they're pretty closely associated with car accidents or drug overdoses or suicide or things like that.

Like, especially in 19 to 40, that's a generally speaking, a very healthy individual with no medical issues, right? No, no ongoing issues at all, for them like statistically speaking in that age bracket commonly, and you have a 40% overall increase in death, that's terrifying, terrifying. And, and, and how can anybody try to diminish that?

And, and they all. Right. The that there's going to be a big push for these life insurance companies to keep their mouth shut. And I wouldn't be surprised if there was a payout to these life insurance companies, where the government has to come to them. And behind the closed doors say that we know you had to pay hundreds because the, the life insurance industry is 100%.

The one that will take the brunt of these large scale deaths of young, healthy individuals, because they didn't take into consideration when they were doing their underwriting. The fact that everybody was going to get bullied into taking an experimental drug that we knew, none of the side effects, I'm surprised the life insurance companies weren't shouting from the rooftops in, in, in funding, anti campaigns over this stuff, because they are the ones who are going to have to monetarily deal with the outcome of, of this pandemic.

From the perspective of. Of the vaccinations and the 40% increase in overall deaths of 19 to 40 year olds. Right. They are the ones who are going to have to deal with this. I I'm surprised they haven't spoken out before this and, and, and made people second guess whether or not they may want to put, put these things in their bodies.

Right. And so I don't know how anybody is willing to, to take to, like, they're still pushing this, right? Like, I think they've kind of accepted now that if you're not getting, or you haven't gotten it to this point that you're probably not going to get it. Like if McDonald's free burgers and a a hundred dollar gift card to.

I don't know burger king didn't do it for you. I guess nothing will cause they've really given up on the vaccine push. I haven't been told to get a vaccine from the radio in at least a few weeks. But, but it has to make you wonder why, why, why are these individuals at such a young, healthy age dying at such high alarming rates and why is nobody sounding the alarm on this?

Like, I, I really have to go back and I want to look at these statistics for myself and see, because that just seems so terrifying. If there was like, if there is a pandemic, it's the 40% of whatever is causing 40% more people to die in the ages of 19 to 40. And there is one, right. There is a reason for this.

And now we're seeing the result of that being from not the like if you didn't know this, John McAfee, the antivirus guy that was mysteriously died in the last two years in his apartment in Miami He basically admitted to the fact that it, the beginning of the computer age, they would basically make viruses and then come out with the antivirus software.

So they would infect a bunch of people's computers because they were a bunch of nerds in garages and they would infect your computer and they would have ransomware and viruses and all of this crazy stuff. And then they would come up with a solution and then they'd charge you for it. Right. And then, and so they could exactly target the people that they knew had it, it was like this crazy money making scheme that he made billions off of.

And John McAfee's are crazy. Do it. He's like really interesting conversations. He did a a podcast I believe with gosh, who was it? It wasn't Joe Rogan. Was it? John McAfee podcast. I'm sure you'll find it. If you, if you look it on your end too, but he, he did a big podcast and talked about his crazy.

Crazy life. There's a documentary called gringo the dangerous life of John McAfee. But I am fairly positive. He did a very big podcast. I, I don't know if it was Joe Rogan, but but it was something like that where he spoke out on. Yeah, he did the episode two 90 John McAfee on Joe Rogan. And that sounds Spotify right now.

And, and it allows John McAfee just to go into some crazy detail on some of these things in his life. And you hear that he's like a, he's just a wild dude, but he would basically create these viruses and then profit off of coming out with a solution. Right. And, and so, now. You see the effects of that.

And we see that, that what is actually going to come of that. And we're seeing that very quickly. If we're seeing a 40% increase in deaths in ages of 19 to 40 now, what are we going to be seeing in 10 years from now? What is the percentage uptick going to be in, in 20 years from now in 50 years from now, when these individuals who are 19 25, 30 today are in their seventies and eighties, and they've had this, whatever it is, and something gets snake venom as a little, a teaser for the wa watch the water here.

But some, some people think it's some crazy stuff. And, and, and what are the effects of that going to be longterm, right? Where, where are the statistics going to go from here if it's already at 40%? And that is super, extremely alarming. I know I have had experiences with more people in my life suffering from heart conditions than I've ever seen.

And so it's, it's very concerning. So the next thing that I'm going to pull up for you here is going to be. The Netflix situation. So Netflix stock plunged 37%. And it's open and it's open today as it heads for its biggest drop in a decade. So Netflix stock plunged 37% on open as it has for the biggest drop in a decade.

Now it also goes on to say that the streaming giant is set to lose 50 billion, billion dollars in value after shutting 200,000 subscribers in the first quarter, as viewers complain, there's nothing to watch at least nothing that doesn't have to do with grooming your children or but what we'll, we'll talk about that in a minute here.

So it goes on to talk about their reasons of what they believe it is the reasoning behind all of this. And so a lot of people have attributed this to the woke agenda of Netflix and even one of those individuals was Elon Musk himself. Iron man, I think we should normalize calling Elon Musk Ironman.

He's the Tony stark of the modern era era. So Elon Musk tweet it on April 20th at 3:10 AM. Wow. What a G the woke mind virus is making Netflix and watchable. There's literally a show about a man. Believing he can get pregnant and some girl behind him holding his beer belly. If you think that's the type of content that the general public wants to see is the same shit that you're pushing in Silicon valley to your employees, that they eat up because you have bananas in the, in the break room and a knapsack in the, in the back office for them to sleep in.

And you're this cool woke place. Like if you think that's what the general population is, your dad wrong, and you will see that when 30% of your stock drops after pushing woke agendas and pregnant men and small children twerking in, in acuities and all of this bullshit on top of just having shitty content like Netflix, hasn't had bangers in like a while.

The only thing that's worth watching on Netflix is Ozark. And besides that, which comes out next week, if you're watching this in real time, which is a great show they just have garbage content. I literally can't think of three or five shows that I would watch on Netflix right now. I see literally, no reason why anybody should have a Netflix subscription unless they're watching a single show and then dropping the subscription.

Somebody who responded to that Prenay pat hall, who said woke mind. Virus is the biggest threat to the civilization. While I said civilization, where to the civilization and Elon Musk said, yes, somebody else said, which is niche gamer said not just Netflix movies in general, video games, TV, it's all infested with current year trend woke garbage for fear, offending a green haired freak next to the band button, nothing original anymore at all.

Except the media coming out of places like Japan or Korea ironically. Hmm. That's interesting. And the Lama said true. This shows the he's expecting video. So a new Netflix show says he's expecting to a man who becomes pregnant with some viewers turns. Edit at it's woke programming. Yeah. That's not how that works, buddy.

And like, there's literally, like, I've seen people Google this, I guess we should Google this too. Like, can men, men straight, like who can man straight, let's see what Google has to say about that. This is literally a thing. It says having a period, this is the first thing that comes up on Google. When you search who can menstruate having a period is not a feminine thing.

And people of all genders, men straight, including non binary, people, age, gender people, and even plenty of men menstruation doesn't change anything about your gender. It's just something that bodies do. Excuse me. Where am I as a man going to men straight from? Because if it's my ass, that's disgusting. And if it's my the thing on the front of me, Madame.

And it's bleeding and just a bunch of men are walking around with their dicks bleeding. I think that we would have people literally going into a panic. No men can not menstruate, not one bit. We don't have a uterus that's shedding its lining. We do not believe from our penis or our butts for that matter.

It is not a thing. You can not hold a child because you did not have a uterus. You did not have eggs to fertilize and you can not menstruate because your uterus that you don't have is not shedding its lining, sorry. No Google, no trans hub.org. Menstruating is not something that bodies do. It is something that happens to females because they're a female because of their chromosomes, because they're able to bear children, which this man from this Netflix show is not able to do.

Sorry to tell you. So I am so could not be more happy to see that Netflix is stock is dropping as a result of this. I could not be more happy to see that Disney is taking the brunt of this woke agenda too. And I think they're next up on the list. I really do think that Disney is going to be the next person who has to deal with the the wokeness that they have turned their business into and the results that are going to come from that.

So now the next thing we're going to look at is going to be the what's in the water documentary. I do think that this is a very I think that this is a very important conversation to have. I do think that there's some questions that I have to, and I, I do believe that there's some interesting information in here and there's some very compelling.

And I, and I'm not going to discount it, but I also have some questions and I also have some concerns. So if you've watched wash the water, we're just going to watch a couple of minutes of the intro and then we're going to discuss it. If you have not watched it, you should go watch it right now. You can go to rumble and just type in, watch the water, which I'm doing at the moment, and you can pull it right up and watch it.

It's, it's, it's quite unbelievable to me that this is I mean, there's enough people watching it to where it is circulating, but it's not a mainstream conversation and there's enough evidence and enough things that are brought up here that are very interesting and very compelling. And if you watch it if you're somebody who is very Very mindful of the information that you watch.

It's it's, if nothing else, it's very entertaining and it's approach. So I would recommend just giving it a shot and if nothing else, it's a 45 minutes of your time and you may learn something and maybe you have some good entertainment as a result. So let's go ahead and I will pull up this right now and we will watch this together, at least the first couple of minutes of it, and then we will discuss it.

Cause I think there's a really interesting conversation to be had surrounding this. So here we go

we're good to go. So earlier this month, a lot of you may remember a post that I made on my telegram channel. There was a lot of concern about the water and not to drink it. And there were certain things that I could say and could not. And I referenced that certain people's lives might be at risk. And one of those people is here with me now, Dr.

Brian artists. Thanks a lot for being here. I do really appreciate the opportunity to do this. Yeah. This is actually going to be the only time I've ever been nervous in any interview. I'm not kidding. Like I've never been nervous to discuss anything in relationship to the COVID pandemic whatsoever, but this has bothered me and it scared me putting things out is probably oftentimes the best way to protect yourself.

But people have lost their lives over what you're about to tell the, I have to get this off my chest, my spirits, like screaming to say something and bring it to the forefront to protect as many innocent lives as possible. That's all I've been trying to do since may of 2020. As when I read Anthony  memo on room desk severe, when I actually just hyperlinked clicked the links to the studies that he was quoting, saying that room Desiree were safe and effective.

I knew right away that he was lying. I knew right away that this drug was going to be used to mass murder, a whole bunch of innocent people in America that did not need to die. Then he was going to sell the world on the idea in the media that they were dying of a virus. When in fact I knew they were being poisoned to death with this drug, I knew 30% of all people were going to experience multiple organ failure, kidney failure, septic shock, and hypotension.

That's what the study said. Now we're a year and a half after that. And it's exactly the numbers that I said based on those studies,

I'm pretty much called the room desk of your guy, but where I go, which is odd for a retired chiropractor to be referenced as a pharmaceutical guy. But it is true.  is a very toxic, deadly drug. There are a lot of medical doctors and professionals who will mention it that as it's just proven to be ineffective.

It is not ineffective. It is very toxic and deadly. It is known and proven to actually injure specific organs in your body. It targets specific organs. This is a part of why I think my spirit is so moved to make sure this gets out. Is that a

in January,

January 21st of this year. So it's just two months ago, the FDA decided to authorize. Rim death severe as the only drug to be authorized to be used in all newborns in this country.

I can't, I cannot even fathom the men or women in charge that would actually do that. So it's now been moved since January 21st, 2022. It's been moved out of hospitals as the only drug to be used only allowed in hospitals, this entire pandemic. Now they're moving it into, in and out of hospital care for children.

As young as newborn seven pounds heavy through the 18 year pediatric age range, it's the only authorized drug. There is nothing else that they're allowing for COVID-19 treatment. And I find that incredibly evil. And then they've also now canceled monoclonal antibody uses throughout the United States and all us territories for COVID-19 early treatment.

And they're moving room desperate. Infusion centers, where they were using monoclonal antibodies as the only IB infusion drug allowed. I've been moved with one singular purpose since may of 2020. When I read Anthony Fowchee memo about rim death, severe, I felt this spark inside of me that I now had to go voice to the world, a warning to try to protect as many innocent lives as possible from being killed.

So let's talk about what happened. It all started with a text. There's a medical doctor that I admire and love because he is nonstop from the beginning of COVID has had the ability to project information and say to people around the world, you do not have to fear COVID we have an answer. This guy has been on many stages with me.

He's still practicing.

So one thing that I think he said there that is a compelling as the conversation around REM does severe. So REM does severe was the one that they've actually pushed and allowed in the hospitals. And there's a big push from this conversation where he believes that REM does a, is being utilized to actually do the deed at the end of the COVID situations where people are dying.

And then it's the kind of the final situation of what what's been. And then, so where, where we go deeper into this conversation with what's in the water, as he actually discusses what he believes is water treatment plants that are being utilized to disseminate. I believe the virus where he actually talks about the fact that he believes that within these water treatment facilities, they are tainting the water with what he believes based on the information.

So this is where it gets a little crazy is where he talks about everybody talks about the woo woo Han bat situation. And if at the very beginning. You mentioned anything about the bats you get hit with a big a big misinformation sticker on there. And, and, and now the only one where you get a misinformation stickers, if you actually Google anything or post anything about snit, And COVID, and he ties a bunch of data into the idea that it is not a virus.

It is not viral in nature. It is a venom and the snake venom was disseminated through the water and finished off through the REM desert veer, which was also included the snake venom of a king Cobra and of a crate, I believe is the other poisonous snake that he gets into. And so it turns out to be a crazy, crazy connecting of dots.

And we'll watch a few more minutes of this year and, and discuss a little bit more about it, but I, I recommend watching the entire thing. So I do think that's very important to do let me go ahead and take a look and see if we can find some compelling parts of this conversation, surround the water and surrounding REM desert veer and the snake by them.

Cause I, I think it's an important conversation to have let's, let's see if we can find the here, give me let's let's watch it again.

Gilly ad bought two facilities that deal with biological studies from Genentech in 2011, and then brought 55 of their executives into Gilliad in 2011. Just when that king Cobra study started,

Gil yet is the manufacturer of room. Deciview guess what's been known since 2005 below. The nicotine receptors in the brainstem being injured by Cobra venom in Viper venom. Guess what drug does that or hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine rim death, severe packaged and stored as it is delivered to hospitals comes in a little glass file.

It's called lyophilized powder. It actually has a white tee yellowish tint. Guess what colors snake venom has when it's stored

then to be diluted in sodium chloride or distilled water to be administered IV, or if people are buying king Cobra venom lyophilized they mix it in the same preparation as listed on the fact sheet for rim DESA, severe to actually take Cobra venom or any other Viper venom and injected into horses to make monoclonal and.

When you read the emergency use authorization for him to severe, it states this one from January 21st, that every practitioner who administered this to a COVID patient pediatric or not, you have to evaluate for what's called prothrombin time. Prothrombin time means if it increases the prothrombin time, it means it's taking your blood's ability to cooperate in making it longer.

So it thins your blood, you can't clot, right? You will internally bleed to death with rim death, severe. It is stated on the emergency salvation. Every patient has to have its prothrombin time checked before you give it rim severe. And during treatment, do you know what do you know what king Cobra venom does to the blood?

It makes it so that it can't clot. It makes it so it can't clock. One of the evidences is it's prothrombin time. And if you look at the CDC website and then H is website. Adverse events from deciview called Beckley. It actually lists, it actually says it increases prothrombin time, which is exactly what king Cobra venom does to the human body and rim desk.

Severe is lyophilized peptides, proteins of king Cobra venom. The university of Arizona published last summer, the paper, when they actually evaluated the blood samples and tissues of people who died, hundreds of them from two different hospitals after being treated for COVID, which means they got what drug rim deciview when they evaluated their blood.

The title of their published article is

welcome back. Why do some people seemingly perfectly. Die from COVID and others. Don't it's a question. Baffling experts during this pandemic, that's sure is a new research from the university of Arizona suggests we're closer to getting an answer as team 12, just winners explains. It seems to boil down to an enzyme.

That's also found in rattlesnake venom. What does this rattlesnake have to do with COVID-19 depths? Shh. We turned much of my research in my lab towards COVID a year and a half ago. Chilton says he got blood samples from more than a hundred patients in a New York ICU. They either had no COVID a mild, moderate or severe case of the virus.

He did some fancy schmancy artificial intelligence in his lab and discovered two distinct patterns in the people who were dying from COVID. These patterns one. The the, the vital organs were in trouble, but the other looked as if they were being attacked by some enzyme, he says he then found the highest concentration of this enzyme that has ever been found in humans.

These levels attacking internal organs means multiple organ failure and death. So where did the rattlesnakes come into play? This enzyme is a humanized version part of the same family as the active ingredient in snake, better in simple terms, this enzyme related to rattlesnake venom that's been found in humans is likely causing tremendous damage leading to COVID-19 deaths.

And then they take you through all of the elevated enzymes in the blood samples of these people that are naturally found in rattlesnake, venom and viral. That are in levels they've never seen before. Do you wanna know how they got there? Five to 10 days of room deciview they've known since 2005. If you inject a mouse with Cobra venom, you inject it like they're doing with, from deciview injecting into your veins.

It actually causes a cytokine storm in the lungs of all animals. I am convinced that COVID-19 is not a respiratory virus of any kind. It is actually venom poisoning and they're using, I believe synthesized peptides and proteins from venoms of snakes, and they're administering them and targeting them to certain people.

Now, the amazing thing about these 19 toxins found in Cobra venom, and they're specifically sequenced to target specific Oregon.

Wow. So I think I had to let that go for a little bit extra than I expected to, because I think it's such a compelling argument and it's such an interesting correlation and he's not the only one saying this. Right. And my reservation with the watch, the water documentary is that this chiropractor goes by doctor.

I guess that's probably my leading reservation regarding the possibility of truth in this. I think it's a. I don't trust any chiropractor who considers themselves doctor in an interview. If you understand that they go, they can go through two years of schooling and become doctor compared to what an actual doctor does.

And the only reason they did that is because back in what was it like the forties they lobbied forties and fifties. They lobbied the association to allow them to use the word doctor, to legitimize the chiropractic practice which was started with a seance of ghosts. If you don't know anything about that, the chiropractic situation is crazy.

Like is literally like the very first person that came out with chiropractic did it because he had had some type of. Go say on, since this ghost came to him and spoke to him and told him that he could cure deafness and blindness and all of the diseases of the body by manipulating the joints. And he claimed to have cured a child's deafness and all of the crazy beliefs that, that, that the, the lower that comes with the original chiropractic.

And that's not to say that chiropractic doesn't do good stuff but, but so does a foam roller. And I think that it's I don't know, that's a personal bias. I, and if you're a chiropractor and you're listening to this, I appreciate you and your business, and I'm sure you do plenty of great things.

It's all jokes. Kinda, but it's serious. And it came from a wish seance. And, and then the, the son of the man who started chiropractic also basically ran over his father for cheating or for, for sleeping with his girlfriend. It's crazy. It's a crazy, a series of events. But all in all, I don't trust chiropractors and at least ones that go on TV and so happened to have a bottle of the, the solution to the problems that they say there are, which this man does on his website.

I don't know, but that's my only reservation that besides that it's a very logical seemingly argument and there's new stations that have articles that are out. And just like we listened to that confirm this situation. And he's not the only one saying these things and he's just kind of connected a lot of the.

Now the next conversation that becomes quite interesting as the conversation around the water, which he believes is being used to disseminate this venom in a way that it is targeting specific communities as a singular time. And I, I don't want to waste your time by sifting through all of this data, but I really, or this, this video, but I really do think that you should go watch this documentary.

I really do think that there's a, a lot of important information and conversations that should be had. But I do think that there's a part here where we can watch it, that does have to do with the water. So let me go ahead and start this for you. And we'll talk about the water situation briefly, and then I'll let you actually go and watch this on your own.

Cause I think it's such a, such an important Conversation to at least thought, thought experiment, right? If nothing else, take this into consideration and think about it. And if you think it's all bullshit, then go with that. But at least you, you heard them out because I think a lot of people are quite concerned about this being a real possibility right now.

I saw this, I knew, I knew I was right. I knew I was supposed to see that because it was confirmation to me that other people knew this was planned all along, which we've known this as a plan. Yes. The FBI figures out that it's actually peptides found in crate venom that poisoned Reddington in the show, you learn that he was poisoned by drinking.

It was put in his drink. And then I realized something. I realized how they've been spring.

this is a video of somebody putting a test strip underneath their sink faucet to see if it test positive for the snake venom. I've actually told my wife six months prior to this, that it's very odd when you go on the CDCs website that they have this wastewater surveillance tab on the COVID data tracker site, and they have 400 water testing sites in 37 cities in this country.

What no one knows is the data from the CDC between January of 2020 and September of 2020 in relationship to their water testing of these 37 cities. They only let people know they were doing it in September of 2020, and now releasing that. They now just announced two weeks ago, Willinsky did have the CDC that they're now upping their water testing.

They say, and have been reporting to media outlets. That how it works is they are PCR testing our wastewater because we, as we get COVID-19 are pooping in the water and we're going to test our wastewater. And we can tell the city when there's high amounts of SARS, COVID two in the water. They can actually tell that same community four or five days later is going to be an outbreak of COVID-19 in that city.

That is completely backwards. If, if a community has had SARS COVID to go through their body, they already had their symptoms. When they eliminated the virus, supposedly the virus out of their body. And it ends up in your wastewater. You no longer have symptoms. How could you know, and then be able to confirm that.

In the future four to five days from now, and we find it in your wastewater supply from your city. When we see it being shed in your water, four to five days later, we can actually tell you there's going to be an outbreak in your city. It's not because there's an outbreak in the city. Just like in the show blacklist, I had to break this down for every aspect of COVID.

One thing that's been very unique to COVID is this sense of loss of taste and smell that last for months, even years, holy cow, I had no idea. They already knew this, did this to people. When you drink it for the people who are the natural healers or the individuals who've got bitten, when they actually suck the venom of Cobra into their mouth and then spit it out, they have this loss of taste and smell that can last 12 months a year and a half.

It's just from having exposed in the mouth, which is exactly what's happening. When it's being put into our water. Now, the thing about the waters. They are using the water systems because they can target specific demographics. They are absolutely confident that the peptides they have chosen for COVID circulated throughout the earth and throughout the populace specifically targets and the vaccines and the marinade in the vaccines specifically, target organs, like your spleen, your pancreas for diabetics.

That's a concern brain tissue, liver tissue, lung tissue, and heart tissue. So if you already have a disease, all right. So there is the water theory. Now I still don't believe there's enough evidence there for how for, and maybe they go further into it. And I don't recall it from when the first time I listen to.

But I, I, excuse me, for, for a documentary that's called watch the water. It seems to be, should be called king Cobra or something. Cause they go very little detail into what that actually is about, because if there was something they were disseminating through the water, I guess they're kind of they're they're basically saying like the connotation there is that, because they're able to say that they're predicting where it's going to go there.

Basically. I don't see the correlation between somebody putting a a test within the waste and, and then saying that there's going to be an outbreak in that city having to do with the fact that the water has been tainted with the venom itself. It doesn't correlate specifically for me there.

And I was hoping this here at this time, and maybe I just didn't go further and far enough into it. But that's all I remember them touching on when it comes to the water situation. And I think that there should be a further investigation as to why the he's saying that you should not be drinking the water.

Right. That's the, the that's the statement that was made prior to this anyways, is that you should be watching the water. You shouldn't be drinking the water, and if you do, then you're somehow going to get COVID. So I would like them to go more into detail with that. I am not convinced that it's in the water.

I'm not convinced I, I, I get the correlations with the snake by them. And that makes a lot of sense with all of the, the weird symptoms that have gone on, especially when you points out the loss of taste and smell, which I experienced myself at one point when I had it and still experienced for months afterwards, which is so bizarre, but I just don't see enough of a conversation surrounding the water within this documentary to make a full statement, like third poisoning, our water facilities.

I wish I did I not, I wish I did. I, I think if they call it, watch the water, they should probably have gone into more detail on that. But I, I do think that you should go watch it and tell me if I'm wrong and let me know why they're calling it that and what, what they said here. That makes that statement.

Other than the fact that they're saying that they're pre they're basically calling out who they're going to, in fact, based on these water treatment facilities prior. When actually it should be based on a reactionary state where the people in that area have COVID and then shows that they have COVID and they already have the symptoms.

Not that there's going to be an outbreak from testing the water, but in testing the water, you're testing the fact that it is being poisoned. So, maybe that's it, are they saying that the CDC has these water testing facilities and they're showing that the water itself is being poisoned prior, then people are getting COVID.

That's why they're being able to call out. Who's going to get it. And when based off of the water treatment facilities and testing, that's there as a result of that. So I guess maybe that's it, that, that makes a lot more sense to me that, that based on the fact that they are testing the water in the waste treatment facilities, the water is what was tainted, not the hoop of the people who had COVID.

And as a result of that, they're saying that there's going to be an outbreak. And then there is one that have they correctly identified that there's outbreaks. I just have a lot of questions around the water situation. So maybe you have some clarity and you can message me at red pill, revolt or Austin at red pill, revolution.com.

Send me an email and let me know what you think. Because I, I really don't see the correlation there. It doesn't make much sense to me why they would be telling you that it's in the water. And then, then that's a, that's deeper than I've gone before, where I it's makes a little bit of sense. And maybe I'm just missing something in that in that statement where, where it's, it's very clear to other people, but it just doesn't make any sense to me.

I, at least not enough to, for me to not. Water. Obviously you should have a, have a, a filter because it's just gross without it. But anyways, so there you have it. That is the watch, the water conversation. And I, and I, and there's obviously more that we could go into there. And then I would love to go into it and fact, check this and, and look at the statistics and really sit down with Dr.

Mr. Chiropractor artists and, and have these questions together and have a good conversation around it. I actually did reach out to see if I could have him on, so we'll see if that happens. But very, very interesting conversation. Go watch that documentary. Let me know what you think. Send me a message.

At red pill revolt on Instagram and let me know. Now the very last conversation that we're going to have here is going to be on the Patrion. So you got it, man. If you, if you're listening right now, you'll be able to catch the bonus content. What we do in basically every week as I go through conspiracy Reddit and find my favorite conspiracies of the week, and we discuss them in the bonus content on the Patriot and the Patrion just cost $5.

You get all the bonus content, you can listen to it there, video. You can also just download the RSS feed so you can get the bonus content directly to your podcast platform that you utilize, which is awesome. So $5 red pill revolt red pill, patrion.com/red pill revolt, and you will be able to sign up for $5 and get the bonus content.

The things that we're going to discuss today, I'll just kind of give you a little brief preview here. Is the reminder of that the whole idea of a personal carbon footprint was actually a targeted ad campaign by BP. We're also going to discuss the idea that. Let's see. Oh Julian Assange was ordered the extradition basically to the United States where he will face 175 year sentence.

And that is some of the conversations that we're going to have, and maybe a couple more so head over to the Patriot on $5 is all it costs you for the month and you get four of these bonus contents, every single time. There's also a discord server. And then on the second level, that is the first level, which is the George Soros level.

At the second level, the Royal bloodline level, we will be doing a stream once we get a few good group people on there that will be an extra podcast every single week. That is a live stream. Just like the one that you're watching here or listening to. Surrounding user submitted topics and that's $15 a month.

So join that. Join me on Patrion. Let's have a good conversations around these and if you're not going to that's okay, too, if you cannot afford the $5, I still appreciate you. I'm glad you listened to this podcast and you are waking up to what is going on. So leave a five-star review. Thank you so much for listening and welcome to the revolution.

Thank you very much.

In this week's episode of Red Pill Revolution, we discuss recently declassified DIA documents that show data on human contact with aliens, and the potential side effects which include things such as "Unaccounted for Pregnancy"; The documents also outline human experiences with Yeti's, Elve's, Ghosts, Poltergeists and other mythical creatures. We also discuss Brian Stelter getting verbally ripped apart by a college freshman over CNN's involvement in spreading propaganda, Nancy Pelosi getting the notorious infection the day after receiving a warning from china about her next day's trip to Taiwan & More!

On this week's Patreon-only bonus content, we discuss the contents of the claim that "the supply chain disruptions blamed on COVID were actually due to massive amounts of weapons being moved as well as countries scrambling to change who they rely on for imports and exports in preparation for World War 3" as written by a Redditor who cites several very compelling sources.

The Patreon begins at only $5 and includes weekly bonus topics, full video episodes and more!

Sign up now at:

https://Patreon.com/redpillrevolt----more----

For all the articles, videos, and documents discussed on this week's podcast join our substack! 

Podcast Companion Substack: https://redpillrevolution.substack.com ----more----

Please consider leaving a donation for all of the hard work that goes into this ad-free podcast. I love doing what I do and can only continue through your generosity and support! 

Donate https://givesendgo.com/redpillrevolution 

Full Transcription:

Welcome to red Pill revolution my name is Austin Adams Red Pill revolution started out with me realizing every thing that I knew everything that I believe everything I interpret about my life is through the lens of the information I was spoonfed as a child religion politics and history conspiracy Hollywood medicine money food all of everything we know was tactfully written to influence your decisions and your view on reality by those in power now I'm on a mission a mission to retrain and reeducate myself to find the true reality of what is behind that number and I'm taken your ass welcome to the revolution hello and welcome to read Pill revolution my name is Austin Adams and thank you so much for listening today this is episode number 24 of reptile revolution podcast and again thank you so much for listening I can tell you how much I appreciate it we have some really interesting stuff to go over today anything from Nancy Pelosi coming down with the vid in a timely manner right is she supposed to travel to Taiwan so we'll talk about that and potentially why in the conspiracy surrounding that situation were also going to touch on Brian Stelter basically getting ripped apart by a college freshman over the disinformation campaign by CNN and the propaganda that's been pushed over the the previous few years and then were also going to touch on all yeah this tiny thing where the DIA came out with 1500 documents from a freedom of information act regarding alien abductions onion planned or explainable pregnancies on women by these potential aliens Burns high-frequency basically attacks on humans and flying objects basically just released in last week and literally nobody is talking about this so all of that and more today really really excited to talk about these things oh and also working to get into a little about Project blue beam never heard a project will be before it is a conspiracy's arrest that goes all the way back pretty far basically to the understanding that they are using all of these alien campaigns to eventually implement some type of New World order and bring all of the world's religious messiahs together in a holographic beam onto the sky and all of this crazy other stuff so make sure you stick around for that that will be at the end and again thank you guys so much for listening if you noticed hopefully you noticed the sounds way better than it used to I went from having a $100 microphone basically USB plug in the my computer to a whole huge awesome set up here because I wanted to you know give everything I can see you guys so thank you so much for listening I hope that you enjoy the improvements I really do because I spent quite a bit of money on it so I hope it sounds better I hope it looks better and I appreciate you guys so much so thank you for listening if you could go ahead and press the subscribe button leave a five star review of your Apple podcast YouTube spot if I were ever the hell you rat there's probably a button to rate the show and again I would appreciate it so much beyond that go ahead and join the patron patriot.com/rental revolt during our sub step for subs that companion I which is rental revolution.sub stack.com and for now that's all I got for you guys so again thank you so much for listening over to jump into now is going to be Nancy Pelosi coming down with the bid as as she's in a timely manner surrounding the Taiwan visit so here we go it's go to Marsha's video and we'll talk about it Nancy Pelosi has tested positive for calls it her Deputy Chief of Staff out with a statement saying after testing negative this week Speaker Pelosi received a positive test result for COBIT 19 and is currently asymptomatic the speaker is fully vaccinated and boosted and is thankful for the robust protection the vaccine has provided the speaker will quarantine consistent with CDC guidance and encourages everyone to get vaccinated boosted and test regularly it's going around Washington Valerie Valerie Biden I don't know Valerie is actually in Washington but it's a going around Washington circles hi Kim hi all I do know that it was still around me I thought that COBIT had come and gone anyway and that we were waiting for it to come back me and I thought we were focused on Ukraine now in the we didn't really care about covert anymore and I was slightly three weeks ago I'd I lose track of time but it it it is it is hitting a number of members of Congress and staff others is specifically hitting some yeah political people I have a startling way with Alma Krohn in December it's amazing that anyone can state it could have not got like my everyone got every single person got it I guess some some people who will doubt that on that one Muriel Bowser got it some people who missed out on that way I guess there now doing well here is yeah because now there's an even more transmissible strain that's out there it's the kaizen and yeah yeah because another cousin the s'mores transmission around really deadline environment just because it actually started waving your excitement I think that because I wasn't really following is much anymore but I know that it had gone through Europe and even as it was waiting for Europe and all of these countries were having massive surgeons like Denmark has adequate having another sorry nobody cares let's see if it talk about anything that omicron was the sick on what I'm looking for here is to see it and they talk about the Taiwan situation something they are here anyway because that is missing that the most ridiculous thing I should not do it at all but but DC correspondents Association dinner coming up in like 3/30 over three there aren't any generally well be three weeks quickly as this thing moves yeah could it could be mostly gone be kind of funny if they had to cancel it because I watch them still try to do it anyway because they visited missing that the most ridiculous thing I should not do it at all but but DC law the political class loves the there's a real elaborate days in so there there is today when they would try to strong-arm like force that likely boosted with the yeah the I'm looking for here is conversation surrounding Taiwan taken in whatever now I know I don't think it's 43% I think it was like I think that even during even at our doesn't look like were to talk about it when I was looking for there was to see if they to cover conversation surrounding why the idea is that she had COBIT so you know what been supposed he was supposed to go to Taiwan this week basically I don't know exactly why but she's was what I want and is to issue basically the Chinese government came out and if you don't know anything about the Chinese Taiwan situation China does not want to recognize Taiwan as its own country because eventually they want to do it Ukraine did I'm sorry what Russia did the Ukraine and just completely taken over and have the history books that tell it as if Taiwan was always a part of our country and so there's this whole thing there where they want to kind of eliminate any conversation surrounding Taiwan's legitimacy and we saw it earlier I think it was last year where there was a woman on the basically grilling a US official about this and she literally pretended as if her microphone on the first year he but pretended as if her microphone literally didn't work like a the run is in call imagine if you're a business income and some just like you do you estimate serious question about your business or about profitability about your net return on investments and all the sudden they just but it's like it did the old crinkling of paper against the the phone the situation where she is she acted there he acted got a new look that up as if you the they couldn't even participate in the call like they froze we just didn't move on camera because they didn't want the Chinese government to be mad at them about recognizing Taiwan answering this question surrounding it so Nancy Pelosi hears the Chinese government does not want her going to Taiwan and all the sudden that the day before she supposed to go there she comes down with COBIT oh okay yeah really believable so so there's this whole idea that basically she she just uses COBIT and that's kind of what they hinted to their when they were saying that there's this government told dinner were there there kind of mixing and mingling with celebrities in three weeks and it be kinda funny if they all got it just timely right around there you know because it because it basically just uses a political tool at this point if you can if you can cry wolf you missed a get out of anything right now you know how I see it and a lot of jobs where you know people are calling out you know Cindy got the cove it because now they gotta be out for two weeks now our politicians are literally doing that so I just thought that was funny I thought that was interesting the timeliness of that the day before she supposed to go to Taiwan she all of a sudden has covert interesting now the next thing that over the watch here is going to be Brian Stelter basically getting ripped apart by a college freshman you heard that right in the panel looks to be disinformation in the erosion of democracy and here's Brian Stelter if you haven't seen the Brian Stelter clip with Russell Brand to where he makes front of Brian Salter if you don't know Brian Stelter is you will immediately recognize his list and lack of testosterone as soon as you hear him speak but he was a CNN there is to this day works for CNN and in you'll be able to hear who he is and just a moment once you hear this college freshman basely rip apart CNN for everything that they've done rightfully so go ahead and watch the clip now you for coming my name is Christopher Ppillips on my first year at the college my question Mr. seltzer Steve all spoke extensively about Fox News being a purveyor of this information but CNN is right up there with them they pushed the Russian collision halts they push that Jesse select hoax they smeared justice Cavanaugh is a rapist and they also smeared Nick Sammon as a white supremacist and yes they dismiss the Hunter Biden laptop affair as pure Russian disinformation with mainstream corporate journalists becoming little more than apologists and cheerleaders for the regime is it time to finally declare that the decanting of journalistic ethics is dead or no longer operative all the mistakes of the mainstream media and CNN for I like to use the word regime there I think that's an important term to be able to use that you know lick that this cooperative cohesive unit across all corporations and political government ties celebrities Hollywood you know we saw those things all all kind of intermingle here and I like how use that word regime he's literally just laying out every single thing that CNN has done recently it is a perfect manner so let's let's continue watch this clip and I just I thought that regime word was the perfect term to be able to use when it comes to the collusion of CNN of the mainstream media talking heads even like Fox news and in the ways that we've seen it in the modern day last two years and he really just rubbing your face in it so I thought anyways good good use of that term squatting continue the particular seem to magically all go in one direction are we expected to believe that this is all just some sort of random coincidence or is there something else behind it was a college student bankrolling St. and Brian felt a minor liberal network is just as guilty and perpetuating intonation as any other media that has been accused of doing side Brian felt was a guest on the panel at the invitation, Australian Australian accents are great by the wife see Krista Ppillips he was a college freshman at the University: a panel for labeling functioning as that the value of this information but David thinking man is right topic to a few examples including when training pushed the Russian collision hi when I push the chassis montage and of course my studies of late when the network dismissed Hunter Biden laptop story Ppillips launched into a blistering argument whether it's time to finally declare the kind of journalistic ethics instead of the mainstream media continue to act as she arranges for the right same thing the Democrat party take a look at how the same engine let's answer the question arguing that Christopher is watching a different channel to the one that he watches too bad sign for lunch got 1/32 there there is a closet is 30 seconds but my honest answer to you I will come over and talk in more detail after this is that I think you're describing a different channel than the one that I watch but I understand that that is a popular right-wing narrative about CNN it's important what about shared reality and democracy all these networks always outlets have to defend democracy when they screw up admitted but when Benjamin called Fox correspondent was wounded in Ukraine the news crews at CNN the New York Times stopped what they were doing they tried to help they try to help get the country try to find the dead crew members that's what news outlets do that's how they actually do work together to your question about sharing those kinds of connections and trust we'll talk about it enough the we don't share that reality about how that happens with regard to the regime I think you mean Pres. Biden last time I spoke with her by name we held each other so that's the reality of the news business people see people don't hear they imagine that it's a situation that simply is not but I think your question it speaks to the failure of journalism to show our work and show the reality of how our profession operates we have a lot of work to as a dividing story finally gains okay so I actually saw the the remainder of that clip for the first time I did when I saw before was just the response was I can try to dance around like you're watching a different TV channel than me so you know we want to watch the full clip on these things we don't want to just sit in and take the clips that conservative right wing media outlets on Instagram or twitter or tick-tock just put out put out for us because outreach culture right so even in that situation I didn't know that he went into full detail on those things and in kind of you know said that we we have work to do right they know that you do not trust them that you know that you know in the but EPO still dances around it and give you some cracker should you know we yelled at each other like there's no correspondence between me and Joe Biden's government like of course there is and we know that CNN is just a puppet talking had for in the right way the regime right what a perfect way to put that so you know in in that particular situation Brian seltzer went to a little bit more detail and in the hopefully he did go talk to that guy like he said he was going to because he didn't answer a single question about maybe how they were trying to combat this this idea that everything that they're saying is corrupt or wrong in in he didn't even really deny it you know he say what he said was basically they tried to find dead people in Ukraine are journalists when they were killed in but hey at least he didn't you know at least it wasn't as candid a response as we thought before you know it it's it's a sad day when eight and I talked about this last episode I think it it's when you go back and read the comic books when you go back and read comic books like you know who it was Superman was a journalist to write like all of these superheroes all the superheroes were like there is theirs there was a certain amount of like the steam that came with being a journalist and even to the point where you were like idolized in in in comic books right and so we completely lost that way right it was like the hard-nosed cigarette smoking whiskey drink in truth finding journalists that used to be thought of in like that those 70s 80s and 90s and now it's literally just political talking heads for for big brother and in so you have to go to these one-off channels like you know this one to to find the actual full stories right you you can't just listen to these mainstream media has because we know growing up we always heard about China right we always heard that China wouldn't even let you watch that did the TV channels that are out there right they they wouldn't even let you hear that the fact they won't even let you use Google right now it now we know that our own government is censoring certain media outlets regarding Russia and Ukraine right like root routers Reuters rockers are you this RT news think root routers there being completely centered like II try to find a YouTube video about Putin doing judo if you didn't know Putin is actually a judo black belt in competed in Sambo as well enough he competed but I know he participated and that is legit judo black belly watch the videos of him doing some throws he's a legit judo black belt and I want to go find them when Elon musk threatened to beat his ass and twitter over over a country and that when I went to go find that they would literally on YouTube said you cannot watch this video or or did this channel is not supported in your country and so we have become the China that I used to took to frown upon in middle school and high school when I heard those things I just thought it was the craziest thing in the world that they were able to watch TV channels they were able to go to certain websites write it in and it all surrounds what were seeing now with our media and even YouTube and in the Internet being actually censored and that's the problem with these like this the strip mall that we have today is is you know back in the day when you surf the World Wide Web you know the times of AIM in your away messages it was a different Internet right is like you used to go to different different specific websites and used to know the websites that you want to go to and it didn't always just be three or four websites right like that right now you're probably use Google I hope you don't you should be on brave browser and break search engine now that Dr. Koza will snitch to but you probably use Google probably go on Facebook you probably you know have a few different news outlets and if you listen to this podcast probably not right you probably have a few better ways of looking at his brother that is most people write most people use the Internet like it's a strip mall like this for five options that they can go to and if they deviate from those options is like the wild wild West and it's our fault for letting it get to that point that's awful for allowing the mainstream that the general public to be brainwashed into thinking that you know you can't venture out on the Internet from those specific websites right and so I think that there is a certain conversation to be had around then I do think that our media obviously has a long way to go in the ways that they correct these things that I don't see any way that they can redeem themselves I think that we have now shifted to a new environment where podcasts like this were journalists like that Matt taibi be where where there's people out there who are doing real journalistic work where we will go find them now I think were going away from the last five years even 10 years or so were we've had this like stripmall approach to the Internet and I hope to see this continuance of the rising of podcasts of the continuing rising of sub stacks and in conversations around individuals who have no vested interest in corporations who have no vested interest in politics and in just her speaking the truth because they know that that's there's like a certain part of you I think there's like there's a certain part of all humans that search for the light that looks for truth in times of deception and in it which is interesting for Leica animalistic perspective right like it I wonder if there's anything in any other animals like it would add obviously they're not generally sentiment enough for us to ever know what it's it's a curious conversation to me is like what is that drive as I know I have it like I can't just sit back in if you haven't watch the documentary the dissident if you haven't heard about the dissident it is a unbelievably crazy spine chilling documentary surrounding the literal murder murder of a Saudi Arabian journalist and he floats it from fleeing to the US running you know away from his family being threatened in Saudi Arabia for speaking out the truth about the government about the royal family and then while he was in it went basically up to the consulate in Turkey and was assassinated by the Saudi Arabian government cut up into pieces dismember there's a literal literally in the entire transcript of the conversations that happen because there is a recording device in the consulate and in talks about how this man was this like murdered sauna part horrible horrific things happen to this man because he was speaking the truth and I was sitting next to my wife when we were watching this and it was like almost like a really eerie because I'm in the space that I am talking about the things I'm talking I literally like this guy was talking about the Saudi Arabian Kings son who was actually running the show and all the terrible things that he was doing and you know while my last episode was entirely about Hunter Biden's laptop it was a little a little concerning and in a little those little bit of a reality check it but but again there was that something in me that was like like you can't just not talk about these things is on the voices speaking the truth and and there's not enough people out there who are willing to have the balls to speak up in a time like this where you you know literally got my entire Instagram my whole platform 50,000 people that follow me shadow banned for posting a Senate hearing for posting a Senate hearing that's were read today and so in in that situation you know when when when you're going after the king's jester right when the king kills the jester that's when you know the that the road the monarchy is crumbling right in and there was there was a quote within the dissident that documentary that he said when when speaking the truth I got a remember the right way that he put it if speaking words makes you a if if speaking words makes you the enemy or or they go after you for speaking the truth that shows you how weak they are shows you how how would the foundation of their arguments the foundation of their their their world to their government to their everything is just so so that there is no structure there is no foundation in it so weak that if you speak a word you say a word now they're in a come after you for in this case actually assassinate this man and and that shows you how weak they are his words literally words when your government with that big house scared they are of you how scared they are of us how scared they are of the truth and I know it's gonna come out eventually and it's just a waiting game right when Facebook is shadow bans you when scram shadow bands you when tick-tock shadow bans you there's going to be another platform affiliate is not to be true social anytime soon and maybe it's Twitter after Elon saves the day but whatever it is there's going to be something the light always shows in that light comes from like humanity from the heart from people like you and people like me that seek the truth and know there's truth out there and and and smell the bull shipped in and know that everything that they're saying is is is an effort to manipulate you right if you've ever been around us a psychopath they literally do it's a microcosm of what our governments been doing to us and so it is literally as you know all of the all of the gas lighting all all of the you know abusive tactics the shutting down of part like everything that happened over the last two years was abusive tactics and so it shows you how weak they are it shows you how the it's been built on a house of cards and in the truth is is the wind right and there's so afraid of it there's so scared further further Empire of lies to crumble that they're willing to go to whatever lengths they can including not even allowing you to speak words right not even allowing you to have a conversation surrounding their their their wrongdoings and into their faults it in and that shows you just how weak they are all in all go watch that dissident documentary it's is really really interesting and I think you'll take away a lot from it and it will show there's a reason so like the guy that did it I don't member's name right off the top my head I believe his last name is ogle he's the same guy that did the documentary Icarus that caught all of the Russian Olympians doping that got them basically thrown out of the Olympics so same guy that did Icarus did this documentary the dissident and he went to Netflix he went to Hulu he went to talk to all of these huge streaming services that he had connections with in the past from his other documentaries and none of them would touch this none of them none of them would stream this this documentary and that once you go into it you realize why you realize that they're there they kind of show the cards of of what the next steps of the regime are right they show it that the lengths that a government is willing to go to hide their lies and they show the tools that they use like there was like an 80,000 person Saudi Arabian royalty farm that was eliminated for basically what it was like 88 80,000 accounts on Twitter that word done away with by Twitter itself because they were all going after singular hashtags like if you spoke up like a break right now with the Ukrainian situation like you'll see that hashtag save Ukraine hashtag this hashtag that there's these campaigns and then there's that there's it they go after accounts to so if you speak up against the things that they're talking about those and 80,000 accounts after your account after year one video that speaking the truth and then they'll get your account shut down right maybe that's not Instagram doing that maybe it's not twitter doing that it's it's the government's shadow little bot farms that they're sending there is little they call them those like the bees or something in the dissident but you really gotta go watch a movie it tells you it shows you your hand shows you the links that are willing to go and it shows you how how desperate they are to hide the truth and how weak they actually are and it's a reflection of our own government in its infantile stage is now however he did flee to the United States that's worth noting that this journalist did flee to the United states at one point because he felt that the the freedom of speech platform was the best here but concerning nonetheless because you see where it's all coming to an right now right we see where this is going you see that it does not seem that far off for what happened in the dissident to happen here in the United States so on that note let's go ahead and watch this clip surrounding the DIA documents that release there is 1500 documents released surrounding UFO encounters drowning people who were around UFOs people who basically got like sucked into UFOs women who were impregnated by aliens like all of this crazy stuff 1500 documents released by the DIA showing alien encounters showing encounters with alien weaponry alien propulsion systems and all of the crazy stuff that happened with that so let's go ahead and watch this quick little video surrounding that an MO actually read the documents themselves and go into detail surrounding these things and potentially what the conspiracy could be turning into here with project blue beam which is kind of out there so stick around for that again I don't know if I believe all this but I fight it either I don't know why they tell us now right why would what would the aliens all the sudden be such a hot topic right for how long was it like the tinfoil hat wearing all the movies like try to diminish the conversations around you you were crazy 510 years ago you are crazy if you thought aliens were real right now how how short after that every now accepting it having all the CIA documents, all of these DIA documents, about how there could be potentially real to hold all of these sightings in the military aircraft's and how it it's affecting general public right whereas they used to demonize people right all the way back to Lake Roswell so let's go ahead and watch this clip and I will discuss it will read the actual article surrounding this and then will go into the actual documents and then we will discuss project blue beam but before we do that what a need to do first is go ahead and press the subscribe button wherever you are on this listening to this platform right now how to press the subscribe button head over to Apple music or specify if you could and leave a five star review that helps the podcast a lot it basically puts us up in the ratings let people know that what I'm doing here is quality work which I hope you feel after this the half hour or so that we been talking here I hope you feel that the audios them better I hope you feel it that the videos been better I really redid my entire workflow and spend some good money and all the stuff to make the show better for you guys more money than I've made so far actually off this podcast so if you'd like to help offset some of the costs this entire upgrade cost me quite a bit of money and if you appreciate the show and you appreciate what I'm doing here I appreciate you and you can show your appreciation by heading over to our gifts and go which is give some go.com/red pill revolution and you can give a donation right on there for us or you can do it through a few other ways including signing up for the paid subtack which is the podcast companion which includes all the other articles all of the videos all of the documents from this episode and a few other little goodies that I throw in there and you can also sign up for the patron patron is anywhere from five dollars a month gives you the discord server gives you the bonuses on the episodes because every episode I go a little bit over your 1015 20 minutes and talk about a new topic and then you also get to the entire video podcast episode which you can go to patron.com/red pill revolt for right now it's gets about a half-hour on YouTube and it tells you to go over the patrons of you want to watch the flower were going to talk about the UFO stuff to talk about these documents were to get into project blue beam which I'm really excited to talk about with you guys I think is a really interesting conspiracy and I will discuss all these things together over on the patriot so if you watch the video right now I'm head over the patron that come to watch the rest of it if you're listening you're so to be able to hear the rest of it here but if you want here just that and bonus content were we talk about an little bit more depth of the topic head over to patriot on five dollars a month if you want to pay $15 I am going to be doing a live episode just the quality of the same microphone same set up everything live for you guys it's an additional episode only user submitted content hopefully my Instagram comes back soon so some other people see and we can grow that audience together but had over the patron.com $15 a month will also get you the additional podcast episode that were doing weekly in some other awesome stuff like being able to submit your topics here right without further ado let's go ahead and watch this UFO conversation on the news and then we will discuss it and look at some of those documents together so again thanks for listening this guy washes together say the truth is out there and it might be terrifying hey just uncovered Defense Department summary of UFO induced effects ranging from abduction and paralysis to electrical shocks and even sexual encounters is shocking the world tonight the report again from the Defense Department but what does this all mean how we supposed to interpret it when talking about UFOs restarting this investigation national correspondent way mustiness shows us tonight pilots tracking unidentified object balls of light suspended over the ocean UFOs chasing warships all part of a growing body of sightings of you APs or unidentified aerial phenomena now become something even more explosive 1500 page Pentagon report of previously classified documents cataloguing accounts from witnesses and victims claiming radiation burns brain damage and even paralysis after close encounters with UAVs is the most haunting of all the reports from from my perspective because it shows immunological deficiency it shows altering human DNA it shows degradation on a cellular level prepared in 2010 by the Pentagon's secret advanced aerospace weapons program the report was released only after a freedom of information request it found sufficient incidents and accidents have been accurately reported medical data acquired as to support the hypothesis that some advanced systems are already deployed and opaque to full US understandings this is from within the documents themselves of the report says humans have been injured from exposure to UFOs from objections at perceived time loss the sexual encounters and unexplained pregnancies were talking about an area where there is an intervention with the human being on such modeling it is beyond just the negative health effects some of the stuff is really bizarre so what's next while this program ended in 2010 Corbell says the Pentagon continues to study UFOs and more military documents are likely to be released this how crazy so I believe it was the son news company the sun basically came out into the freedom of information act request to the DIA regarding documents surrounding a secret unit will not so secret but kind of like shadow side of the government which was looking into these UAP's which they you know I like how they just change the name and think you're stupid enough to forget that they tried to make you seem crazy for questioning these things because that's exactly what that was right like the UAP to UFO like the UFO is like what would people with tinfoil hats talk about but UAP is these things are legitimate they they just this the gas lighting right it's it's the it's the making you seem crazy until there is there ready to expose the truth or until they're ready to make you think they're exposing the truth in an attempt to weapon eyes it against you which will talk about through the project blooming conversation but I digress I do think is really interesting that this conversation came out recently I do think that there's something to this but also I do question everything at this point Ray I think that anytime the government's giving a big push on something huge like this then you need to question why now why are they releasing these documents this request was done in 2017 so took them over four years to dictate what parts of these documents they were going to release and why and so you see that some of the things that they discuss on there are the sightings themselves are different types of like bodily effects that the radiation poisoning has on them from feeling the propulsion systems from Mike making looking at these UFOs in the air and then like basically having like losses of time and are reality different perception changes which will talk about were actually looking at these documents but I do think this is this is probably one of the biggest releases knows Jeremy Corbell if you don't know who Jeremy  is he did a documentary with fellow who – why can I remember that guys name you're probably screaming that in your head right now he went on Joe Rogan with Jeremy Corbell and said that he was a part of the team that went into Roswell itself and looked at the actual aircraft spoke to the people surrounding these these aircraft and actually found one of the chemical compounds from the aircraft itself which became added to our periodic table as a result of this years later but they told him that he was crazy for all of us so Jeremy Corbell was the one is being interviewed and that he's been looking into this for a long time is in a few documentaries on it so looking to Jeremy Corbell's work because it's it's quite interesting so now were going to do is were to head over to some of these documents here and read through them so I'll read the sun article which is the actual company that's actually requested these documents let's see right so won't be the sun and the view from the sources UFO docs re-declassified Pentagon reveals more than 1500 shocking documents this is from Marco.com and this is just showing the actual documents here so okay perfect now were going over the son who did the actual freedom of information act request and this was written on April 5 so four days ago this is shooting us in the night so I got is released at 1574 pages of real-life X-Files related to its secretive UFO program after four year battle this online first requested a copy of all files reports and video files related to the advanced aviation threat identification program or otherwise known as AA TIP in other words Tip December 18, 2017 they sent this document to them back to them which said this response your freedom of information act request dated December 18, 2017 that you've submitted to the Defense intelligence agency for information concerning base which is asked for the documents from the agency and class of an unclassified program which ran between 2007 2012 which was the AV advanced aviation threat identification program does apologize for the delay Amber responded to your request as the DIA continues his effort to eliminate the large backlog of pending requests probably how many of them are related to aliens, search of DIA's systems of records located 52 documents totaling 1574 pages responsive to your request upon review I have determined that some portions of 52 documents 1574 pages must be withheld in part from disclosure pursuant to the freedom of information act the withheld portions are exempt from release pursuant to exemptions 34 and six exemption three applies information specifically that allow talks about these options are forcing us and say here is the letter from the Defense intelligence agency confirming is released in 1574 files and then it goes on to show some videos actually taken by Navy pilot pilot showing interactions with unidentified aerial phenomena or otherwise known as UFOs you the cats if we filed in and freedom of information act this is what the article goes on to say from the actual son Mrs. finally after more than four euros rears they release more than 1500 documents includes government commission scientific reports and letters to the Pentagon regarding the UFO program the hall includes reports insert into research on the biological effects of UFO sightings on humans sets out to cat it sets out categorizations for paranormal experiences and studies the Syfy style text one thing they going to hear is basely talking about like elves and yetis and you know they going to some crazy stuff so the DIA the department of defense aspirants that some portions of the documents must be withheld in part due to privacy and confidentiality concerns but the agency added the DIA has not withheld any reasonably sag ripple nonexempt portions of the records the bombshell freedom of information Hall includes reports on the DIA's research into the biological effects of US a UFO fight sightings oh my goodness on humans and this includes burns heart problems sleep disturbances and even bizarre occurrences of as a parent abduction and unaccounted for pregnancy now if I was him and I guess you can alum like you get some child support like that would I guess that be the worst part of being pregnant by an alien they go on to talk about like what happened to these pregnancies that would be an interesting conversation I don't think there's any information on what I see happen but if there's unaccounted pregnancies I'm sure they followed the mom to see if there was some men in black type baby born member that seen men in black where the woman's in the car with the crazy guy and ends up giving birth unlike the side of the road and with like a little squid alien if you I need to go back and watch that but the men in black there's a great scene of an alien a woman pregnant with an alien who gives birth and is either of anyways if you haven't seen that my apologies for that picture you just hadn't had the reports that it has 42 cases for medical files and 300 similar unpublished cases where humans have been injured after anomalous encounters now it says at a tip was a secretive Pentagon program that ran between 2007 in 2012 the study UFOs it was outed by former intelligence official turned whistleblower Luis Elizondo who headed up the program back in 2017 bombshell videos of unexpired UFO sightings by US military personnel investigated by a tip were also first published at the time it says that the revelations on new program marked a step a step change in the way the US talked about UFOs now more commonly known as a different name because they're trying to guess that you as unidentified aerial phenomena in the phenomenon has stepped from the fringe into a serious national security concern discussed by lawmakers defense officials and even former presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton one fascinating document included in the inquisition threat support report sets out how to categorize anomalous behavior which includes encounters with ghosts yetis spirits elves and other mission other mythical legendary entity is classified as a and three seeing a UFO with alien aliens and board would be ACE three poltergeist crop circles spontaneous human combustion alien adoptions and other paranormal events are also categorized studies into advanced technology such as invisibility cloaks mind control robots were also included in the document cash other documents obtained include studies into communicating with alien civilizations and plans for deep space exploration and colonization alright so now it will actually look at some of these documents here and see what they have to say were in a so it goes on to say now let's let's just kinda skip over to the documents themselves so if I when I was scanning the documents there is a few pieces of these are really caught my attention the first ones being the catalog of UFO related human physiological effects it talks about frequency distribution so you see in these documents they talk a lot about like the radio frequencies or radiation frequencies that have to be reached to accomplish some of these things including like things like telepathy and so what we're going to go through here is a table of the facts and frequencies now that the documents that I have here that all include in this week's sub stack is 38 pages I'll see if I can find the entirety of these documents but for now the ones I have is 38 total pages and this is going to be the reference of a table of effects frequency so it says let me just kind of run through all of these with you the different effects that coming into contact with UFOs has had in the situation so I don't know what they kind of like timeframe as of this I think that's an important thing to say you know if this was happening like back in the 30s I think we want to know that if it was happening with like George Washington getting abducted and in you being you know sexually assaulted by aliens I kind of want to know that what what is the timeframe that were actually talking about here so what will start from the top it says the table of the facts when basically coming in the contact Sosa's apparent objections is page 129 electromagnetic effects on vehicles paralysis perceived time loss light beam affects eye injuries heat medical exam oh gosh that sounds horrible is that like probing I think that think you have to be probed in the human world when you're like 40 or 50 right of the colonoscopy burns unconsciousness marks left on body significant sound effects like humming electrical shocks physiological emotional shocks intense fear prickling tingling sensations pain skin sores rash induced headaches and migraines force field impact nausea vomiting sensation of cold disorientation and confusion the ground traces weakness fatigue amnesia apparent experience of telepathy numbness significant odors voice loss appetite loss insomnia perceived time suspension dehydration swelling of tissues dizziness weightlessness levitation healing sexual encounters deaths diarrhea hair loss and nightmares know the ones that I would say are the most interesting to me would be obviously sexual encounters I wonder if like you know why are the aliens that are coming into contact to like kinda given something back here they just you know in it for themselves I think we need to know what type of lovers these aliens are because that could potentially tell us a lot about who they are who they are when it comes to you know award type situation if they were giving love or you know maybe we have a chance of surviving these types of attacks but if they're pretty selfish and you know just kind of worried about getting off themselves and maybe maybe we gotta be a little bit more concerned with what truly and honestly it probably does have some type of insight to know what type of sexual encounters if they're taking his encounter seriously what what were they note specifically I guess we will see that when we see the full documents releases on page 5 if you can pull them up yourself at this point so the other one I will be interested to me are interesting to me perceive time suspension so would that be like like you see the UFO in time kind of stops and maybe you and I am now know I'm I'm really into the sea without the time stopping in the situation perceive time suspension apparent experience of telepathy that's obviously interesting significant motors that sounds terrible whatever significant odors aliens encounters are giving off I probably don't want any part of that ground traces so that's things like crop circles I would assume what is so funny like how many I lay that tells you everything you need to build a Hollywood everything you need to know about like that the that the way that they go about grooming you like grooming you is the right word for this the way they're going about showing us these alien encounters these alien situations all like just so happens that now we have 1500 documents surrounding alien encounters and in the things that have happened to people on these things that we been taking seriously for a while also diminishing the public's opinion on these things and making you feel crazy for talking about them back to the original point I think makes it interesting to think about how how Hollywood what had include into all of these things literally all of these things like every single one of these things have been in a movie right the humming the the ground traces the perceived time suspension the sexual encounter on the night I really haven't seen the movie specifically to take that seriously but I'm sure there's many many should the movies that you can put Hunter furthers some type of alien sexual encounter apparent experience of telepathy that's an interesting one right is like and they talk about that's consistently throughout the documents of this is the situations where like the even like the radiofrequency that needs to be given out or the radiation frequency needs to be given out to allow it to happen now that's interesting to is like how did they get the scientific evidence that shows the numbers that they're putting out these documents to it also says force field impact a Perry and we talked about that pain skin sores rashes electrical sound effects the humming is been a consistent one Hollywood in medical exam That's creepy right II don't want to go to a human doctor who both will have a have an alien trying to figure out what's going on to me like you know May maybe they're just like what if they were abducting people and like just you taking the lower class you know poor and in doing free medical exams them like a these these humans are kind should he were to help you out were just gonna abduct the poor people and give them enough free free medical exams in I think they could do that for dental and that would be a good campaign for for the aliens as if they could you know of duct us and do free dental work because I think anytime you pay like $1200 for a root canal you nothing feels good about that like if you're reading my body of know use insert the blank of whatever BS medical situation but that say something like cancer if you're ready my body from cancer I got a pay you whatever money was due April anytime someone he has to pay for dental work 1200 bucks for a root canal is like right let you can abduct me and in maybe even probe me if you give me free until four so that maybe this is that if we look at this in a positive way you know maybe maybe there's some but there's some good that came out of this like the sexual experiences in the medical exams right leg over to the house their bedside manner for downloads that the DIA as it was asking the right questions during this time they probably should've hired me to come in and consult them on these things so that those were some of the interesting things that came up in that document it did I've actually missed a few pages that Jake went on to say claimed ESP development nosebleeds taste that one of the taste that I saw on here was was metallic ligament metal taste ringing in ears weight loss breathing problems urination problems so they pits themselves gynecological problems claimed in plant perceived teleportation stunned itching loss of taste loss of hearing induced feeling of calm or serenity I think we should do a draft like if you had to choose like three good like the three Baston here don't be like the coolest and the three worst I think we could probably do that pretty easily obvious if you could get that feeling of calm and serenity may be a sexual encounter and some free dental work would probably be that that the top three overall pics of the of the annual 2022 alien awards for for best best action done now the worse one sound to me like they could also be the same ones because in no there could be some terrible sexual encounters medical exams now I'll still take the induced feelings of calm and serenity but anyway so that that was in in no particular order each one of EM effects on power systems involuntary muscle movement induced body odor work growth so the deposit the deposited way of so the oh maybe a sound like the earth I hope no mental enhancement that would be good one mental degradation swallowing difficulty teeth vibrations fillings crumbled old my God so teeth vibrations fillings crumbled that's horrible how hair precipitously turned white shout out to Elsa time sped up unaccounted for pregnancy on accounted for okay so that is in there from that that conversation unaccounted for pregnancy hold my gosh the cave week can we get a follow-up on that guys like if if if a woman became pregnant from an alien can we figure out maybe what came of this situation because you know if there is an alien kid that my daughter's school you know I died at least like to know what age they are cancer fever stomach dizziness stomach dizziness stomach sickness I'm blind physiological energization okay loss of smell external control of vehicle and material evidence that's wildly vague okay so some other interesting outcomes from alien encounters right now the next thing is the rating situation so they basically had a ratings list of how they would rate different anomalous behavior so it goes from I get a and one and two and three and four and five sources anomalies and I guess that's with a N stands for home as a rating system so it says see so just we get the full context here in are equal so his anomalies which have no lasting physical effects is an and one says and and and more for slights and unexplained explosions okay and to his anomalies which do have lasting physical effects i.e. poltergeist materialize objects areas of flattened grass and corn circles okay and three anomalies with associated entities such as ghosts yeah these spirits elves and other mythological legendary entities no ghosts yetis spirits and elves has its own rating on this DIA freedom of information act released class previously declassified documents the way how many do and how many military documents and and and classify governmental documents have the word yeah the on hidden and elves oh my gosh like you need to we need that this is Santa real Santa is deafly real elves spirits yetis and ghosts also on this list dear so how crazy is it that there is a real legitimate governmental conversations in you know how like when you're in a big corporate business how like corporatism is like imagine being lieutenant or or a captain or a the head of the CIA and having to write out documents about yetis why why are people not talking about this this is the craziest ship ever goes yet these spirits and elves and nobody's talking about this stuff nobody who like I would've imagined if the government came out of the documents around and go see yetis spirits elves and aliens in unexplained pregnancies that there were dependent literally people running in the streets to knock on doors to tell their neighbors about it and nobody like you walk into work tomorrow guarantee you nobody's bringing up the fact that the government just released documents about ghosts yetis spirits aliens elves and and encounters with aircraft of of alien kind nobody even walking to work tomorrow when you wake up at or when you get into work and you walk in there today and everybody's gonna be acting normal nothings can be changed nobody's gonna be talking about yetis or elves nobody's gonna be talking about poltergeist or crop circles nobody's gonna be talking about unexplained death or unexplained pregnancy from aliens nobody nobody is talking about this stuff why why who if this does not rattle the cage and in like why are we not having a conversation about this is why why are we not discussing this in public why are we not running to our neighbors house and saying that yetis could you know the government is recognizing the possibility of yetis poltergeists elves and other mythological like I like how they tell call them still legendary entities how is this is not proving their real but it is so interesting to me that some governmental employee is having to sit in in the right out a specifically formatted document to send as an email to somebody higher up within the organization surrounding yetis Argie they are yet he's real like our elves alike can this is I don't know what to think anymore know I'm when I leave this this podcast on the go see if I can really find my daughter unicorn because according to the DIA that seems very much within reach maybe you do if you can find Unicorn you can find dragons would be the way to go though that seems to be the coolest and I was too bad that women that would been pretty sick right anyways so let's move on to set your answer for you now one of the things that this came of this document that was discussed later was a concern around some of the actual military applications of these things that have already been implemented so one of such things was the conversation surrounding like the hypersonic missiles right like China and Russia both discussed how there was these new hypersonic missiles that came out and that they think that it was defying the laws of physics is quote unquote so here's an article by the son also discussing this is as hyperactive China I guess hyperactive is the name of the third news organization China secretly test to hypersonic nuke missiles that defied the laws of physics sparking panic in the West so that's like if you heard people talking about these things how they can just completely shift their wit where they're headed towards in midair hypersonic glide vehicle so it goes on to say that the test launches reportedly took place during the summer within the first on July 20 during the summer with the first on July 27 using a fractional orbital bombardment system which propelled the nuke capable hypersonic glide vehicle around the planet according the financial Times who spoke to the two US intelligence sources Beijing launch a secondary missile on August 13 three sources familiar with the first test at the launch stunned Pentagon officials because China demonstrated a brand-new weapons capability however they declined to go into further detail one source that scientists were struggling to understand the test which the US and other Western powers cannot replicate adding that it appeared to defy the laws of physics presidential my Biden admitted that yes he was concerned about China's development of such weaponry however his defense secretary Lloyd Austin and other White House officials refused to comment on the reported tests the Chinese Foreign Ministry has denied the report insisting they launched a space plane in July and not a missile earlier this year satellite images show China was building hundreds of silos to house inter Continental ballistic missiles and rockets which have a range of more than 3000 miles and can carry nuclear bombs well that's terrifying hypertonic missiles can hit speeds of up to 21,000 miles an hour and potentially even faster and are seen as devastating new frontier of warfare the rockets are a game changer because unlike ballistic missiles which find the space before returning on steep trajectories they zoom in on targets at lower altitudes this combined with typical speeds of five times the speed of sound makes them extremely hard to shoot down in a potent weapon more countries want to get their hands on a senior diplomat has warned the US is unable to defend themselves from the hypersonic missile well that's terrifying a senior diplomat has warned that the US okay sweetie said the ambassador Ron Peart would the US representative at the conference on disarmament in Geneva said hypersonic technology is something that we have been concerned about we just don't know how we can defend against that technology either does China and neither does Russia but the revelations of Beijing summer missile test has sent shockwaves through Western intelligence who fear they actually underestimated China circling the globe it shows that the weapon potentially has a range of some 25,000 miles and can even operate in space it means the missile can theoretically hit anywhere on earth a key part of the hypersonic missile concept is the glide vehicle which carried around 30 miles above the earth by a rocket but then becomes detached interesting okay so that's terrifying now the conversation that that arise from wow so China's is like a way better than everybody else's while so China has a range of 25,000 Koreas has a range of 2000 Russia has arrange a 3700 in the US is top range is secret but the top speed is 3800 mph which is probably in the top three for Russia's 21,000 miles an hour and then the range or the top speed for China's unknown North Koreans is 3800 so obviously it sounds like Russia has the fastest that we know of by far smashing ours China has the longest range North Korea sucks but it's equal to ours interesting as first because so interesting enough that was supposedly something some type of like technology that could have potentially come from these type of revelations from understanding and read the verse engineering the aircraft that were received in things like Roswell so on from there now let's go ahead and touch on project alluvium so the transition from this the Segway here is the path is that there's an idea out there that the government is not just releasing these alien documents at this time because they want to and they all the sudden want to tell us the truth rightly quiet why would they now decide of all times to release these documents right why does it matter today what is what is the agenda right and so that's where project blue beam comes in the play and project blue beam basically explains that the government is doing these things to basically find a way to culminate all of this information to a a I don't know if I'm using these words or a precipitous like a peak right like a of all of this information coming out and in one that would like to terrify everybody and unite the world and and allow us to like be subservient to a new world order which referred over and over and over again in project blooming is the idea that they are releasing these documents they are releasing this information they are normalizing this content surrounding aliens alien vehicles alien abductions so that eventually they can utilize that platform two get you to go with whatever it is that they want and what they want is a new world order a singular world government imposed upon the people and in everything that you do is surveilled every action that you take is governed by this entity and if you go against the things that they say you are going against essentially them deeming himself as God in every which way so how they are going to implement that is this is called Project blue beam in this conspiracy world so project blue beam is the idea basically that they're going to utilize this information and are dropping this information over time to get you to a point where you will go along with the government being the Savior of this new alien species that is wanting to attack us okay so now you have the premises go ahead and read this article which goes into it a little bit further in a size 1994 surrogate mom and asked a writer and investigative journalist from Québec published an alleged manifesto of sorts explaining his wild theory that was renamed infamous in certain circles to this day what is project living according to Sergey Manas the four step project designed by NASA and the United Nations would allow these governments to accomplish what he believed to be their ultimate goal of creating a new age religion led by the antichrist in order to start a new world order dictatorship while I do know my stuff NASA would implement project blue beam Manas believed with a system of advanced mind control as well as top secret technology in order to trick everyone into believing there will but there would be a second coming the first step one the project will be and would involve the manufacture of artificially created earthquakes in strategic locations around the world these earthquakes would according to the conspirator there is hoaxes unearth artifacts indicating that the religious doctrines of all nations have been misunderstood for centuries thus discrediting all religions Manas claimed that movies like 2001 a space sadly had already laid the psychological groundwork for the step by presenting stories in which mysterious unearthed object up and everything humans know about themselves and the world the second step Surrey Manas claimed would involve a gigantic space show during the stage of project moving three-dimensional optical holograms as well as later laser projections to of holographic images would beam across the sky what would these images include projections of Jesus and Mohammed Buddha Krishna would be merged into one so the ideas like that the race could get a take all of the deities all of that that the gods and project them across the world across all of the know like if you're in you know in the United States or to see Jesus up in the sky if you're in you know Israel or you know the rent you know so on and so forth there to see the different gods that are specific to your area that are shown among you in the sky rained like somebody has even like related*link to this somehow I there's like a tither the somebody throughout there somewhere at some time I think but anyways the ideas that there eventually can assaying Abboud is going to show up in Intel all of the Buddhists that you know we are one and that that there is a terrible enemy upon us and you know like his name is Santos is like they'd literally just drop these seeds across everything that there's going to be this you know evil that's going to come upon earth and all of the deities of the world are going to come together and in that can unite the people of the world and and so Whitman asked explained the technology behind this display saying that the conspirators would use space-based laser generating satellites to project simultaneous images to the four corners of the planet in every language and dialect according to the religion it's interesting that you say four corners of the plan I didn't know that you my missing something there though there they like Arianna let's move on as the whole sky is transformed into one massive movie screen this God would speak to everyone in their own language next the third step is where in mind control would take center stage telephone at communication devices would send waves to reach each person within their own minds convincing each of them that their own God is speaking to them from the very depths of their soul so there even like pointing to this technology being a possibility in those documents when they talked about like the Patel potential pulled telepathy from radio frequencies right in those documents in certain portions of them they talked about how the radio flicked a certain level of frequency that would have to be amended in order to give the ability to use telepathy in these ranges and so there literally showing you that there is a framework for this right that that there is a possibility of of of these entities are entering your mind and having telepathy and in and so project blue beam does like weirdly enough fit right into this documents that were just released is how would you how these rays be able to reach people's inner minds Manas explained such rays from satellites are fed from the memories of computers that have stored massive data about every human on earth and their languages the raise will then interface with their natural thinking to form what we call diffuse artificial thought okay never heard of that before I'm finally the fourth step of Project blue beam would make use of various technologies in order to convince people the alien invasions in the rapture itself were taking place thus making it easier for the powers that be to take control of a fear added populace now if this is going to be implemented I would assume it would be implemented in the next three years under the Biden administration because I don't think that the aliens really are or or that that the potential the people behind this making you try to think that there is like an alien invasion of sorts is going to want to deal with somebody like Donald Trump I would I would much rather think that they would probably want to implement this with somebody who has no personality and will not push back in any way so from like a logical perspective if you are this governmental agency and you are trying to utilize this project blue beam situation and implement these things in this way I would assume that you would want to do it within this timeframe so that's kind of a terrifying thought button that is goes on to say that the NASA blue beam project is the prime directive of the New World order's absolute control over the population of the entire were earth I would suggest you investigate this information carefully before dismissing it and the fanatic as a phonetic lunacy now what goes on to say the modern following of surrogate mass theory and the end of his life goes on to talk about that which I'll include in the subsector now it the sum of the comments here say that in the year 2022 he doesn't look so crazy and now does he kind of true he doesn't look that crazy night I think it's an interesting conversation to be had there right so anyways I think that was a great conversation of next articles that were to be touching on here you know good art is much about aliens that I do think there's even more of a conversation we had about this project will be and so it's will talk about that briefly so will but I think this is is is an attempt to control like the ultimate control like utilizing this that the most the that the thickest strings to humanities being right is like religious at deity's and in the idea of of something unknown in the end of times and like trying to to bring all of the religious tax that have been put in front of us right trying to bring them all to ahead together for them massive manipulation of the world and so there there's even like this this theory out there that right there is like there's the Vatican there is London and there's Washington DC and that that the three parts of the New World order right London being the financial aspect of it Washington DC being the military aspect of it in the Vatican being like the feel that the spiritual and religious aspect of it and and so that's why they're all three their own specific entities right there led the Washington DC as a district it is not a part of the United States government or the night view the nation itself rates on its own state is not a part of of the state that surrounds it is its own entity and its basely a corporation of sorts that is not governed by the Constitution so the ideas that those three areas specifically are like intertwined as as a part of this like new world order and so they're trying to implement this ultimate control by it by pulling on that the thickest strings of humanity's sole religion you know the fear of the unknown and the idea that were just like little ants in this world of like alien hood right in the only way to be saved is by all come together under this new world order that is you know controlled by the deity that all of these deities come together to show in the sky and or in your brain nor whatever it is right so to me it's an interesting theory right because why would they be coming out with these these articles now why are they pushing this information because they didn't want to they wouldn't be doing it and are not doing it out of the goodness of their hearts I promise you right so what is the real reason time will tell and if my theory is right and that's going to happen during a time where they have the flimsiest floppy asked most flaccid president in history then they would do it right now under Joe Biden asked the flimsy floppy flaccid Joe Biden I think somebody should put that on the sticker I think that's the ultimate way to describe Joe Biden unless you can do a sprinkle of dementia on top of the three F's anyways so let's go ahead and move on here now if you want to continue this conversation were to be discussing a few things here the next conversations good to be around the real conspiracy that the supply chain disruptions were blamed on Cove Ed were actually due to massive amounts of weapons being moved as well as countries scrambling to change who they rely on for imports and exports in preparation for what were three in the other article were to touch on briefly is Elon musk and all of the people quitting Twitter in the good for humanity there so if you want to join us there go to patron.com/red pill revolt you get the bonus content to be able to hear the entirety of this episode and you'll be able to hear everything that were talking mother you also get the video of this you don't have to follow long through that sub stack you can use actually see everything on your screen you like me sometimes I just like watching that and I seen everything there stored on your desktop or your work in whatever it is what you're making some food at night go ahead and head over patron.com/reptile revolution is five dollars and you get everything I just talked about bonus content video episodes and joined the upper tear there on the first year as the George Soros tear the second tier is a royal bloodline tear and you actually get access to a free will not free is paying for its $15 month but you get an additional episode every single week once we get a few people on that tear there him to be doing a live episode every single week just based on your topics so head over there right now and that is patron.com/reptile revolution or nonstarter patron that comes a triple revolt and then speaking of reptile revolution should go to red pill revolution.sub stack.com and you be able to see the subs that companion which is a lot of it's free you get the videos you get you get some of the articles you get some of the content there you get the actual podcast delivered to your email every single week directly therefore you write your email so go to red pill revolution.sub stack.com and sign up there for free and you can actually pay for the entirety of it which has some extra goodies in their everything a week for you as well but for now that is everything I have for you guys thank you so much for listening I appreciate you so much and welcome to the revolution have a great week

On this week's episode of Red Pill Revolution, we take you on a complete deep dive into Hunter Bidens Laptop including "alleged" cocaine-fueled sexual relations with Barack Obamas Daughter, his inappropriate relationship with his 14-year-old niece, the incestuous relationship with her mother (Beaus Wife), and all the shady business deals in between; as the main stream media has finally acknowledged its legitimacy. We also discuss Madison Cawthorn's recent comments surrounding being invited to an orgy by 70-year-old Washington politicians, Elon Musk exploring the option of starting his own social media company, Will Smith pulling out of the Oscar Academy, Psaski leaving the White House & more!

----more----

On this week's Patreon-only bonus content, we discuss the contents of Ashley Bidens Diary which includes comments about alleged inappropriate showers with her father and the difficult life of addiction she has led since. Click the link below to subscribe!

Please support the show by going to https://Patreon.com/redpillrevolt----more----

For all the articles, videos, and documents discussed on this week's podcast join our substack! 

Podcast Companion Substack: https://redpillrevolution.substack.com ----more----

Please consider leaving a donation for all of the hard work that goes into this ad-free podcast. I love doing what I do and can only continue through your generosity and support! 

Donate https://givesendgo.com/redpillrevolution

Full Transcription:

Welcome to red Hill revolution my name is Austin Adams Red Hill revolution started out with me realizing every thing that I knew everything that I believe everything I interpret about my life is through the lens of the information I was spoonfed as a child religion politics history conspiracy Hollywood medicine money food all of everything we know was tactfully written to influence your decisions and your view on reality by those in power now I'm on a mission a mission to retrain and reeducate myself to find the true reality of what is behind that number and I'm taken duress welcome to the revolution hello and welcome to red Hill revolution my name is Austin Adams and thank you so much for listening this is episode number 23 of the red pill revolution podcast again can't you so much we have had a crazy week to say the least and the really looking forward to this conversation around it to some of the topics that were the talk about I will highlight briefly so you know what you're getting yourself into because if you're not in the car you gotta find some way to buckle up because this week was crazy really looking forward there so just highlight high level of organ to talk about today John Zach Psaki some you may find me in the in the simple reviews for not saying her name right so the PSakae PSasaki at the government calling her process is asking him however you say her stupid name she is going to leave the White House for low and behold a position with an MSNBC who would've thought that there was somehow collusion between corporate news companies and you know politics rushing to touch him briefly some pop culture again briefly to his Will Smith resigning from the film Academy as a result of his lap controversy which there is an interesting conspiracy around having to do with a company called Pfizer and their new alopecia medication which was actually one of the sponsors of the Oscars he didn't see that Pfizer was actually a sponsor of the Oscar show they put it right up there beautifully on the board during their broadcast of this that they were sponsors of the Oscars and they just so happen to be coming out with an LP should medication whom interesting next thing to discuss is going to be found she himself having a video resurface of him basically explaining that you shouldn't got vaccinated next they were to touch on is Elon musk potentially coming out with his own social media platform were also go into detail some of the discussions on recently Madison Cawthorn came out during a podcast and you been listening to show you know medicine Cawthorn is the man has had several conversations with him myself is a great guy and has brought some really interesting topics up to the modern political arena so he basically said something about somebody offering him to become a part of their political teams orgy for theft in the also seeing somebody basically doing cocaine in front of him that was part of the GOP annexing ring to discuss is going to be a deep deep dive into Hunter Biden's laptop which is resurfaced recently with believers the New York Times and a few other media entities which came out and finally you know maybe a year into the presidency interesting how they waited that long to basically say yeah I guess this is true you know after social media band you if you said anything about the laptop for how long nobody's discussing that you were going to dive completely into that laptop what was in that if you don't recall these things will retouch on them if you never heard about what was in this laptop you know some crazy crazy things crazy things including him him basically sleeping it were doing an appropriate social things this 14-year-old niece you know the daughter of the late Bo Biden some of the other things are including him potentially having sex with Malia Obama that the child of Barack Obama and doing cocaine be as shown by her credit card wild wild stuff and then the White House coming out and saying that they will not rule out Biden pardoning Hunter for these actions which seems completely on the wrong soap anyways that was a foreman and introduction on all the crazy shirt that were to talk about today I hope you're on board because can be an awesome conversation now if you hear this next noise that is because this can be such a great show you will hear me opening up a beautiful fear to go through this conversation with you ready if you got one the time it together right next year grab it and there we go all right looking for this conversation and we are going to start off right here with Jen for the sake biggest the sake basically leaving her job and I see this is gonna have to do with radix right is all do with numbers and they know that she is been a horrible in a horrible face for Biden nobody believes her ship any more than they believe his ship and so they basically decided to get rid of her and she somehow landed a job at MSNBC so let's go ahead and watch this clip which is from the help are sorry for the terrible 70s porn music but go ahead and see if we can find the actual clip because that was the hill doing some overlays and typing stuff instead of you know making an actual video about it so let's find the very first video that comes up for her leaving the White House which we will watch right here all right here we go this is by ABC seven let's watch this video and see if they actually tell us what's going on conference at Sec. 10 sake appears to be on the verge of a big career move the 43-year-old will initially said she would stay in a position for a year is reportedly in advance contract talks to join MSNBC access first broke the news onetime political commentator will serve as a host and an honor expert with the move expected to come next month sake will join a cable news landscape that is clad with alumni of high-level Washington politics that's the coach for 30 seconds of them telling you exactly what I told you which of the fact that she's leaving the White House after one year of lying to the American people and to be replaced by some of the outs and she's going to lie to us more only under the guise of people who we know are liars which is in the mainstream media so I don't know whether to feel good or bad about this we'll see I saw some the else some woman that stepped into her position answering questions recently and didn't seem any more reliable than she was and but it's been a fun year clown show of watching this female Pinocchio tell lies to us over and over and over again is almost insulting at this point to see that with the way that they rub it in your face because how many times that you know how many times she been asked a question as she other dances around it is completely lysed completely lies right to your face about it you know it's it to me it's telling of were white houses right now right it you know if if they can even tell that you should at least be able to find a way to tell me something that doesn't make you look like a 100% liar the second you may be able to pull up any of the facts around the situation so just always mention that finally you know the witch is dead Zaki is leaving the White House and going on to continue her lying career with MSNBC now annexing to touch on briefly is what I talked about earlier which is will Smith resigning from the film Academy over the Oscars slap controversy which we have a video here for you a week and what a week it has been sent to Wilson a slapped comedian Chris rock on my TV at the Oscars that aftershocks of that movement continues to reverberate around the world snap snap comedian over a calculated that's next wife Jadda Pinkett Smith now the actor has announced he's resigning from his membership and be a timely statement to the actor says he will fully accept any and all consequences for his conduct calling his actions shocking painful and inexcusable and that is where we begin this edition how we can have you joining us to discuss on your hammy house displacement content so will leave it there would only listen like I could you can listen to me so Will Smith decided he was no longer going to be part of the Academy know if you're familiar with that little conspiracy that I told you about earlier the conspiracy is that Pfizer basically funded the Oscars which if we have been paying attention all of the last two years you've seen celebrities everywhere basically be pro Pfizer in every single potential way you could possibly imagine looking at every turn for pushing the American people along with the agenda of Pfizer to get vaccinated right that your kids accident to get your pregnant mom vaccinated get your wife actually to get your dog vaccinated all coming from celebrities which have no fundamental reason to be talking about science now we come to see why they were doing that right of course if the Oscars is funded by Pfizer the Oscars is the you know Pfizer is now going to have as much political push and play because otherwise why would they buy would they fund the Oscars why would they push money towards celebrity academies because they know that the academies control the individuals you have to be a part of the Academy so if you're part of the Oscars you know the Academy at the Oscars Academy when you're going to push the fundamentally systems and in in the things that you're told to push by the biggest single sponsor of an organization which in this case happen to be Pfizer right so interesting enough there's been full blowing articles around the inter-web of the world wide web I may say the basically that Pfizer was coming out with a brand-new elocution medication and that the potential for this controversy happening at the very same time after coming out of this alopecia medic of medicine is quite low right why was a hell how weird if you know how many times he heard the word alopecia in the last item a decade let's talk about that was less time heard alopecia well you heard it the second that will Smith smacked the ship out of Chris rock for saying anything about his wife in the what a lot of people believe was fake interesting now that's the case right it just so happens that the guy who went up there and slapped the ship out of Chris rock for saying something about his wife who had alopecia then one the single highest honor at the Oscars of the best after and then now he says his goodbye piece from leaving now that I've got best actor and probably made tens of millions of dollars from Pfizer if not more for smacking somebody on stage so if you're in that conspiracy world that is an interesting thought right did he go up there and did this event happen this acting event happened to raise awareness about this I do know autoimmune disorder which Pfizer then just so happens to sponsor the authors for which then just so happens to be the biggest talk of the night for the Oscars last 10 years and just so happens to be run the same time that the releasing and outpatient medication in an efficient southland whoever's doing this is obviously quite good at it whoever is on their Pfizer marketing team that that should should be the one winning actor of the year because all all of the things that they've done over the last couple years to make these things happen is from an outside perspective beside looking at it for the negative terrible things that they've done and all the people that they killed is quite the feat to get to know whatever percentage of the American public vaccinated with something for no specific reason at all and then to go on and sway the Oscars to get Will Smith to go smack the ship out of Chris Russia for an alopecia medic's medicine if this is all true it's almost impressive and obviously in the worst way right you know the things that Hitler did were impressive in a terrible horrible unbelievable way were how the hell did you get that many people to go along with your ship in this case same thing what in the world who is running the show it it because I receive the things that they're doing it is impressive in the worst way if the all of these things are true now I don't know not saying that it was but it seems pretty where that is alopecia medicines coming out right along the same time as will Smith smacking Chris rock over this alopecia joke the biggest platform ever right so now speaking of Pfizer and speaking of vaccinations let's go ahead and listen to Dr. Fauci who had a clip resurface recently of him basically saying there is absolutely no reason that anybody who has had the flu should get a flu vaccination because that's the best thing you could ever have is the flu the best vaccine he says you could have is actually getting the virus so let's go ahead and listen to his own words here generally that appears to be the case with you of the cheese of the flu for 14 days should she get a flu shut will know if she got the flu for 14 days Jesus protected his anybody can because the best vaccination is the get infected yourself and so should not get it if she really has the flu if she really has the flu she definitely doesn't need a flu vaccine yes she really has the flu she should not get it again that she doesn't need it because there it's the best is the most potent vaccination is getting infected yourself Henderson North Carolina okay now could you imagine if somebody said that on national television about Kovic you if you got COBIT have absolutely no reason at all vaccinated flagged misinformation hate speech racism sexism misogynistic trans phobia which put his will have to be careful in effect for a book on social media if you said that ship right now or two days ago or two years ago when this coven 19 thing came out if you said that you have no reason to get it at all if you said Word for Word what he just said on national television about coven you would literally have been removed reamed out now don't mistake it this same principle exactly translates in science has not changed guys no matter how much gas lighting the American political system tries to push in your face with or their corporations or the Hollywood Oscars science is not changed Yankovic is no reason you should be vaccinated because the most powerful vaccination according to Dr. Anthony Fauci is to have gotten the flu if you got the flu and you know you got the flu there's no reason to get the flu shot Dr. Anthony Fauci now replace the word fluke for culvert and we know how much of a flocking hypocrite that this man is just pushing the narrative of the companies that fund him like he has done for a very very very long time all the way back to the AIDS epidemic and what was the medication and ZT I am pretty sure it sends easy now that could either be the limitless drug from opposite Bradley Cooper cookbook for half her is either AZT or NZD am pretty sure the the fifth pretty sure it's AZT yeah NDT was the one from limitless alleyways agency was a drug if you know that was a cancer drug that was repurposed for the AIDS epidemic by fudging himself and end up killing tons and tons and tons of people that was completely ineffective and did nothing but they were basically repurposed it because they had no reason to be able to use it for cancer treatments and they made so much money off of repurchasing it for the AIDS epidemic which some people don't even think was real interesting so from the words of Dr. Anthony Fauci if you get the flu Nova Scotia a covert don't the Cova Chuck over the vaccine is your have the most powerful vaccine that you could ever get according to Dr. Fauci do that information which please know I don't know if anybody still getting vaccinated at this point like if you'd be if you gone this long without getting vaccinated this probably very few people were going to the local CVS or McDonald's drive through like that you were doing for a while is a crazy lie, it's quite only crazy things that happened over the last couple years were those like you know from from the guy that was eating you know it was like the New Jersey congressmen are governor who is eating a cheeseburger like sloppily wholesome mom now love this love this burger and his French fries know you can only get a free one Nephi a bold bit of vaccine in all you flat people out there that want a burger on the go get your vaccinations out to cadets was gonna make you healthy maybe just skip the burger lose the weight and you'll probably live longer Ellen probably don't get vaccinated either because now we know if he does get COBIT yet the basically the flu and for some people even less than what the flu was you have the strongest vaccination possible quote unquote Dr. Anthony Felty not my rent on codes over not wearing a look at a quick video about Elon musk teasing the idea that he may put out a new social media platform nose on the back of true social right now if you don't know my Instagram has been shadow band I only when they got talked about this yes my Instagram is been shadow band of beyond oblivion you cannot even look my name up in the search bar right now and find rental revolt if you look for my name and you'll follow me he did for type in the name exactly red Hill revolt you will not see it in the search bar you will see my backup count account with 400 people who follow it if you fall back up to follow it reparable to but look up her adorable and Instagram and you will no longer find their account we have been shut up and be on oblivion for reposting that Senate hearing about the bio weapons labs that's it that was what it was and now I lost basically my entire platform and I've built with hundreds and hundreds of hours of work over the last several several months and and having to find new channels to market this podcast and builder audience so if you know any ways around that complete Alabama let a brother know because my videos dropped in my story Japanese to get lean on for 5000 people watch my story at drop down like 300 or 200 and used to get you know up 350,000 views on some videos now it's about 3000 with 50,000 followers the leg incompletely organically and it's all done hundreds of hours of work down the drain now is I don't drink as you're here listening to this and I appreciate you so much but point is pointy for my perspective that for speaking the truth in talking about a Senate hearing my channel has been obliterated off of Instagram and you can no longer find my channel even if you search it directly word for word letter for letter cannot find it really quite disappointing like deep down in my soul really sucks really sad about it but that's right will keep moving forward I will build it back even better and we will continue this revolution but please consider donating please consider sharing this podcast know of everybody on his pockets or an undershirt to one person we could double the audience and I would appreciate that so much so if you think I'm doing a good job go ahead and share this with 1235 people that you know many would mean the world to me because right now it is a struggle trying to build this with no you know at least the singular platform that I built it on with organic outreach being just to be taken for me for no other reason than telling the truth so we like to do that there's a share link rate on their you know you could also go ahead and subscribe subscriber now click that click the subscribe button if you haven't already you know if your listeners podcast for the first time thank you so much click that subscribe button I would appreciate it and also leave a five star review from Apple podcast grants modify go heavenly five-star view would mean the world to me but other than that what you can do is also go to give single.com give single.com/rental revolution to make a donation there it would mean the world to me it tells me that what I'm doing mean something to you or you can join the patron on the patron we have a full video episode if you like to listen to it is right on the patron for you it's five dollars a month and you also get the discord server for $15 a month really moving towards eventually once we get a few people on there a live additional episode every single week right on the patron for you guys were it's all user generated questions and topics so patriotic.com/red Hill revolt current so yeah let's go out and watch this I'm not on the backs of basically true social taking it sweet little time approving people to get into true social still have been on the waiting list for several months now lost all contact with them that I had directly to get me signed up ahead of time so now Elon musk may be able to build an entire platform in the input before her fifth trumpet is letting people actually on the true social I wouldn't put it past you on musk so let's see what he's talking about with this new social media platform Tesla's chief executive officer and billionaire Eli lost his difficult serious thought to building a new social media platform which he announced in a post last weekend according to Reuters bus was responding to a Twitter users question on whether he would consider building a social media platform with an open source algorithm and one that would prioritize free speech and what propaganda was minimal must've been critical of twitter and its recent policies his announcement comes a day after he put out a Twitter poll asking users that they believed to twitter it here is to the principle of free speech over 70% voted no I'm surprised that there's 30%… At Chevrolet twitter doesn't care to eat twitters better than the rest the right sliding scale I don't know if Twitter is better or worse than Facebook yeah kind of debatable item there are things I like about Twitter better I like there sort of bird watch fact checking saying is better than Facebook's third-party fact checkers which are atrocious twitter just twitter let's you and it doesn't block the whole article though they let you like put a comment on that and then you can count on that comment and it's a better program than Facebook's like just utterly awful that checking but I do know it I guess I don't know which is worse overall.Dorsey was kind of committed to free speech in some ways he was the Noah Zuckerberg so so Zachary Zuckerberg still in a still there any but were at that me but I have both platform sensor data center slightly different content same thing right tape that's really challenging navigating all of these big tech platforms for you know if you like right for example because it were posting clips on twitter and on YouTube on Facebook you have to kind of know okay let's platform have its own rules and regulations and are not all the same and so what is it can it be but it was interesting to think about a platform that would prioritize free speech I'm not really sure what that would look like my guess at Elon built that I did I don't know if it would be one of those things would like to let you know where he goes full throttle with it and says okay let's do this like twitter and bagging alternative or if it would just be something he kinda builds commands like twitter and then change its policies that formula but why start networking via twitter and just fix it up a little bit in the richest man in the world why not yeah and in the hole having it be free speech it is so okay so it's it's a private organization so doesn't have to follow the First Amendment none of these you platforms do and I don't think anyone people say they were they just want to be free speech platform usually what they mean they still want some level of moderation like we don't just wanted to be you know porn and death threats and right now there's going on twitter there is talk on twitter to visit regularly on Twitter it's been most discordant social media policy there is porn allowed on twitter not on any other platforms but that but all this via some amount of harassment and in the policing of that kind of stuff pretty much everybody at the end of the day is going to think is appropriating the question is where you draw the line and you know different people would dry differently but not know any platform that sets out to say no whenever to draw that line just a line is not heavy as a platform that said it could definitely be more allowing of open in a discussion and debate of legitimate issues like the things we talk about in the shower try to talk about the extent to let's us that could certainly be a better and improve note in Norman on a platform like Twitter for me the line is the loss so if something is breaking the law and that would be where I buy I think that you build the law is aligned but that would be more like like technically that is I don't think it's illegal to you know to do it just to just say where someone lives or what their phone number is right that you can't Go to jail for sharing that information on twitter I think of you post someone's phone number or or or address physical address I think they should take it down II would support a social media policy against that kind of behavior even though that behavior is fine under the First Amendment rights really you now yeah that's it's totally legal to dock somebody yeah everywhere absolutely yeah the 10th shut down Nexus now that I think about it I guess they do it all the time like here in LA you can do a tour of the Hollywood homes write a check and go see the celebrities nozzle drive you buy them yeah AI I suppose yeah there there are some things that should be different on social media that right they would not complete First Amendment I think it's my opinion that is patient they should prohibit right that the meeting is to be genuine community guidelines like for example if they collectively put it out there and asked the people would you be okay with docs and should we allow that on a platform and people would overwhelmingly say no anything okay that's part of the community guidelines one of the issues of these big tech platforms are not even really asking the community what the community wants or doesn't want right or just telling us these are our identity guidelines whether you like them or not but maybe if something was more inclusive right and said as a community what it really made it legible for all we know that the community on Twitter in particular might be totally for absolute censorship of dissenting views right eyes and that's real nice certificate not on Facebook now on Facebook I think the commute Re: so getting mixed reviews or temperature taxing in some ways this is illegal it can be us to consider the form of harassment however anyways Eli must coming out with his own the platform potentially at least he uses it now if he does decide to do that like I said appropriate and probably happen faster than I'm even let into true social know what would I have a problem with is all of these you know secondary tertiary social media outlets all tend to be like a Twitter reproduced twitter basically were just gives you a certain my letters and if you posted it goes on the civil feed and you can find people to follow based on who people share their feeds of and like I do hate that like short form you know I'd much rather talk to guys through video and discuss things that way and in get organic outreach that you know it's like much more I do know I just don't like the Twitter I've never really use Twitter's and cyclic 2012 so that I don't know if true socials like that it seems like it might be but I do know we'll have to see it and I hope you know somebody eventually comes out with a differentiation between tick-tock and Instagram is interesting finding like what they just said is that you know you have to walk that line and I'm sure the hell does but you know what I do even more with content that I talk about is that you have to find the line with each individual social media late and I'm pretty sure tick-tock will give anybody flexor stuff it just immediately is taken down the post of the video about the cat situation from you know what an episode or two ago where the cats got banned from the international Federation for Russian And that got flagged for hate speech on on talk but it's the most effective way to get your podcast or you know is the most effective marketing tools if you can put out solid video content in the the amount of reach that you can get where people just don't put very much time into video editing and if you do it well and in the things you're talking about are interesting and you are tend to be an interesting person who is talking about them they can circulate quite well on those platforms so I hope that eventually tick-tock Instagram reels get replaced with something that is speech based because I would be really good for the revolution rental revolution the show they are listening to rhino but it will be interesting to see if that plays out and haven't heard much more about it other than that now were going to jump right into our last topic before going into the Hunter Biden laptop which is a nice segue medicine Koestler went on to a podcast over the last week and discussed how he was approached by people within the political sphere about joining them in an orgy FS you heard that right and then he went on about how he seen people snorting cocaine and things like that all while in the political sphere so as much as video and then we will discuss it and is a quick little video about a new source and some people would been going after Madison Cawthorn for speaking about these things so let's go ahead and watch this clip here does revealing it was a show called house of cards number for my head around… Are you familiar with how you are seriously as I am with Kevin Spacey and I forget who else was in it, but AMI will not ship very well done aerial gunship but it was so dirty and it was about this Congressman who was Kevin Spacey who is an ethic was minority or majority whip yet what was yeah and so anyway very very powerful guy and it was just kind of like his secret life of all this corruption in power and money and perversion and was just purity how much in your opinion because your you been behind the veil is this fictitious show or is this more closer like a documentary it isn't that bad so I heard a former president that we had the 90s asked the question about this hand he gave an answer that I thought was so true and he said the only thing is not accurate in that show is that you could never get a piece of legislation about about education past that quickly and everything else is, aside from that I mean the sexual perversion that goes on washing I mean it being kind a young guy watching norm of the average age probably 60 or 70 and I literally feel a lot of that I have looked up to the my life always paid attention to politics guys that you Allison you get invited to hang with sexual get together at one of our homes you should turn them what what what you deserve some kind that and the is asking to come to an orgy or the fact that you list some of the people that are leading on the movement to try and remove addiction in our country and that you want him doing a keep on cocaine like Bernie and it's this is this is why and then there's also, the whole espionage aspect of what goes on washing of so many people trained in secrets and there there's a currency of secrets and so a it's wild and then yelled there's members of the of the the media the journalist you kinda will keep nasty stories about you or about other people on a shelf and then we fear about, speak out against him then once you will come out safe or about to drop the story of when it was 17 years ago you did X, Y, and Z you don't want us to drop that story to you sort were in a bully back in this position practically let's say that all of a sudden I was going in the office by the way I have no political aspirations zero and in people are always like children for office will by no absolutely not like sport people are have that colic have no desire to do that… Is a little thought experiment I am just elected Congress Senate whatever and I get in there and I go through my orientation and I have my good values and stuff and I stand for something like many others before how does that slippery slope actually get in front of our current president in always been in public service for 50 years at a certain salary which is kinda like good but it's not great you can't become a lavish multi-multi-multimillionaire with all these different houses in it the math doesn't work like the battery example that there was a real example of a real exam yet not good right before we added of a Nancy Reagan at about 700,000 electric vehicles to our federal fleet I noticed because if you go to that uniting its CEO watchlist.work you can see the trades that public traded company CEOs in a bind the C suite are making or ought what all trade members of Congress making is a will, monitor that justice was going on and I notice a lot of people in the majority party were buying stocks that had to do with some kind of bad racing technology for electric vehicles and then what you know it about a month or two later it would then announce right 700,000 electric vehicles Julia visit to the to the fleet and that while so let's let's address that in parts so is ask about house of cards great show unfortunate that it's Kevin Spacey because they don't think both left the difficult path for now but speaking on sexual perversion he get it he gets asked you know it he gets basically it starts the sentence with the fact that you know most of Congress and Senate and these people that I look up to for a long time and are in their 60s in their 70s and they came to me asking me to come to this sexual party after house and then he refers to them talking about an orgy this but if there is anybody that Madison Cawthorn is interested in you know how the 22nd 26 decent looking guy you know is interested in having an orgy with its probably not any single person that's also so happens to be in politics unless it was some sort of like you know despite sex with AOC which you know if they decide to do that you know I'm sure some people would do with pay a for a paper before but anyways if there's anybody that he can have an orgy with is probably not anybody that there's you know he's alongside in politics and in the enough audience to the see how many heart attacks happen if this political orgy especially because they all have to have the vaccine in those so it's in the he got like work for this after he talked about it is in and that second thing he goes on to say is basically that the same people were going on to push the policies around American drug addiction are also sitting in front of them taking a key bump of cocaine right in front of him and so he got so much pushback from his own party right for talking about these things and they don't have update they never refuted them right they said no we'll have you know 70-year-old orgies at the GOP convention that convicted but you shouldn't be talking about them is basically what they said about this in the same thing with the regular cocaine situation nobody said he wasn't telling the truth and so will go on to the next clipper they kind of comment on this right were they say you know he should've talked about this it's immature we hope to have him replaced by several other people who would never have brought the situation up but nobody's going on here to say that no that never happens in the political sphere were all great people and don't have the sexual perversions and you know so it is puzzling to me that anybody who tells the truth in politics is vilified immediately in Madison co-authored just tells the truth too much for these people when it comes to their perversions whether it's drugs whether it's sexual perversions whether it's you know they're back back and investments in companies they shouldn't be investing and based on insider-trading knowledge like Nancy Pelosi so he said the things that you're not supposed to say why should you say that the true right there is there somebody here legit a legitimate person in our political sphere who is speaking the truth about these situations is being vilified for so there's a quick clipper here were they we actually see this vilification of him talking about that for for talking about these things by his own political party saying that he should be out of the party because of him discussing these things now that they were wrong but that he should just have nothing to do with politics because he speaking the truth here's that forgings and cocaine those claims are drawing a lot of disbelief after North Carolina Congressman made them good evening everyone abroad, I'm Angela Taylor Martin Cawthorns comment had drawn criticism from his own party before the attendings rice bowl and join that the wrath who was he referring detailed well his colleagues in Congress he didn't name names but even so it's enough to draw fire from the people who work alongside two implicate your colleagues in orgies and not just cocaine but key box of cocaine phrase it frankly I had to Google before you really do what it bit so this was a new and even for medicine got what political scientist Chris Cooper who lives in Madison call thorns congressional district is referring to is a podcast and video work Hawthorne was asked whether the Netflix show house of cards is closer to a document Rick Hawthorne went on to claim he been invited by fellow lawmakers to orgies and watch them use cocaine both North Carolina Senators Tom Tillis and Richard Berger have criticized the comments has have other Republican lawmakers who typically remain silent like Arkansas Congressman Steve Womack I think it goes without saying that no one thanks this was a good thing to say to today I can even believe that Madison caught the work with think this is a good thing to say it sounds like you got dressed down by Bob McCarthy and don't really say this but in this case I think it was well-deserved that dress down comes less than a week after minority leader Kevin McCarthy responded to call for calling Ukrainian Pres. Zelinski fog Madison is wrong if there's any thug in this world it's and his video is been released of one of several times that call for his been pulled over for speeding and cited for driving while his license was revoked what you do with this which is really interesting right so he comes out and says and if you listen to that they didn't say anything about him not being correct didn't say anything about these orgies being fictitious or that these people doing drugs and cocaine in front of him being wrong then say that they said there was not to provide whatever like I said not appropriate we shouldn't even have talked about it and do it if you got right fully dressed down by this other old ass is 75-year-old Sen. for speaking about these things what what nothing he said was wrong nobody's refuted these things yet they're going to now release which is exactly what he said they would do Word for Word so that they keep these things on the shelf and literally the only thing they can find with him is him getting pulled over her for speeding or driving without a license or something on top of that so and he says that's well deserved because he talked about that that the unspeakable orgies and cocaine usage in our political spectrum he literally just proved him right he said that they're going to shelf something about me and then use it when I say something that they don't like so he says only they don't like you old people to gross people want me to join your orgy and you also do cocaine while also trying to save the world from drug addiction and then when I say something about it you're gonna shelf something like a video of me getting holdover that's the worst thing you can find of medicine co-author in doing, and release it at the same time so it tries to overshadow the statements that I said about you asking me 26-year-old to have an orgy with you 70 weirdos and then things only about your cocaine usage right and again this guy this political scientist is standing next to the sky in this interview says nothing about the him being wrong he says is not a good idea to talk about those things whom may be because their true May because there is sexual perversion within our our political sphere maybe because they are doing drugs there as we saw with Nancy Pelosi is inability to keep her dentures in her mouth or did not look like a lizard weirdo standing up in the metal cup of Joe Biden's no speech but few months a couple months ago or a month ago solicitors out theirs and theirs 40 seconds left with zero at the rest they have to say about this if you're one of the other candidates whether you're on a daily or and all are in the 11th district running in his primary there are seven people been running into medicine called Lawrence show a total in the primary and all seven are trying to portray themselves as more mature more grown-up better decision-makers in Madison called work clearly this is going to make that an easier proposition and without a doubt guys I imagine were innocents some of this and some of those ads that have reached all across the state at this point for his part so far Madison Coulter and has not, got the wild very interesting stuff they're not every day those two words out first out your mouth that's exactly on the news all right thinking of us that so can nobody saying he's wrong and he says that older more mature and older than them so they're trying to do depict themselves that way within the seven district so that they can get elected above medicine Cawthorn because you know when they get invited to our orgies hopefully they'll both say yes this and that will speak about it on the podcast you know like that it's so funny that these people can sit here and try to justify note the quote unquote dressing down of Madison Cawthorn on which again they didn't post anything that showed any venom or anything that he said being wrong they support that but they don't support him speaking the truth about politics and speaking the truth about what's behind that veil that they talked about right they just want to diminish what he says throw a video of him getting pulled over and let it fizzle off into the distance and think that he's gonna get outshined by these other people because you know Bill will actually go to the orgies and do the cocaine with the other politicians who do you want in politics the guy calling out these weirdos or the person who's it's partaking in these 70-year-old orgies while doing cocaine is just so weird to me that were in a place where it's the person speaking out about the orgies and cocaine in politics who's wrong who's being in note Guzy was having the news media go after him for saying something about it not a bunch of like news articles like who is he talking about whose heavenly orgies and if them for the in politics who's doing the cocaine bump in the bathroom will probably Nancy Pelosi was but the conversation is not that the drama around who is doing these things are why he said these things the drama is around the fact that he spoke the truth medicine Cawthorn spoke the truth about politics spoke the truth about the sexual perversion within the political spectrum in the political sphere and spoke the truth about the drug usage of the senators that are pushing for addiction correction in the United States while also doing a bump of cocaine but you know medicine cost thorns in the wrong for mentioning the truth not the you know that that the normal conversation that should come of this of like who is who are these people whose doing drugs in the bathroom of the Senate right who is who is calling Madison Cawthorn to see if he wants to come to an orgy neglect that should be the conversation can we be talking about that not the fact that he actually talked about the truth it's crazy like literally anything that you look up right now about this co-author in the a medicine conference talking about these things is a negative connotation about him speaking the truth right like other all in the group of the orgy group like their all in this group chat together talking about all ship medicine because her and spoke about our Sunday night orgies in Washington and thought that the fact that he actually talked about these things try to figure out who did it like the right news media would be going after who is the person who's doing cocaine in the bathroom of Senate or Congress that's the big story the big story is not the congressman who's talking about these people and speaking the truth about these things the big story is they are in the bathroom and that no bump of cocaine or at that person's house was a bunch of seven-year-olds have an orgy and having a heart attack when it happens like that's the story into it to see that there diminishing the truth to see that they can even combat the things that he says but yet they go after him like he's the villain for speaking the truth is disgusting absolutely disgusting so again like you've heard me say before kudos to you Madison Cawthorn first of all for not going to the seven-year-old orgy right entry can do better buddy if in fact the second of all for speaking out about these things against them shelving that video of you getting pulled over which they felt was great timing proving every statement that you said right by the way anyways so where you're going to now move on to the Hunter Biden story about the laptop now again this is resurfacing this is resurfacing again and this was like crazy crazy news coverage right this was this was the story of the year released in 2020 at the very last week of the election cycle got diminished got shadow band got eliminated off of all social media platforms became a part of their fact checker narratives that do Hunter Biden laptop was a rush of collusion right so now comes back up again now that they are did the same news media companies that were diminishing this is false information the same news media companies that were saying there was Russia in collusion that this this laptop is fake news right now the coming out because they know that it's coming to a point where this can be a legal battle hundred Biden has now been subpoenaed for this laptop finally a year after the presidency because they knew that it can be overturned at this point potentially over this collusion or maybe it's all part of the plan and now they know there to be able to put someone else in power right who knows what let's go ahead and see what Tucker Carlson has to say about this the start of this video says Tucker shreds media over HUD and Hunter Biden coverage three minutes long let's go ahead and list with them will talk about systems going on with Joe Biden's poll numbers are absolutely tanking but it seems like elements within the Democratic Party or turning on them record 10 we understand exactly what's going on here something definitely is here's an example new members very well just for the last election your post ran the story of what the contents of Hunter Biden's laptop the human story with big tech censored it immediately seen and in dozens of other former Intel officials told us that laptop was Russian disinformation there are fears that what Giuliani is now pushing here in the United States could actually be part of Russia's latest and very massive disinformation campaigns in the US presidential election so you have a president who is asking to obtain Russian disinformation knowing that that is what it is he is accepting that same information and he is then turning it and using it on the campaign trail against his his opponent and that's the mind blowing it's sort of a crazy quilt at this point which has all the hallmarks of of of Russian disinformation that said it wouldn't for lack of try CNN reported on Friday that US authorities are seeking if those emails we just talked about are connected to an ongoing Russian the disinformation effort so it turns out when the accused people of Russian disinformation are not always sincere course the wires will say where they need to say that was before you actually need to get by elected they did it but others are usually very different now telling in fact the laptop is real piercing and yesterday this is very very bad for the president signs it is an Internet station as you pointed out going back to 2018 and and right now prosecutors in Delaware where you are focusing on a number of things including whether Hunter Biden and some of his business associates violated laws including tax and money laundering laws and the foreign lobbying laws are now gaining steam and they need to make a decision I think in the at least intermediate future in this case is been going on for four years and there is a realistic chance this could result in federal charges of course then we be an unprecedented political territory not legal territory but a situation of having potentially the Justice Department prosecuting and trying to imprison the son of the president what a freak show the channel is to look to other new subscription service but now telling yeah it's all true actually and that's not the only story about Russian disinformation has fallen apart this week the Federal election commission just find the DNC and Hillary Clinton or campaign $100,000 if she determined that the Clinton campaign should hide its role in funding the steel dossier Phil dossier is the false document that claimed among many other things that President Trump elected turns out the disinformation was in fact paid for by the campaign was coming from the D&C subscribe to the fact so exactly what he just talked about there is CNN and you know all these companies that are were formally talking about being Russian disinformation about this laptop and now they're coming out and saying that although maybe it could be true now that they're going in it with you see this all the time like they they come out and say that ship though I got everything's wrong and that what what you're saying is untrue and then eventually went they know that they been backed in a corner enough that they try to salvage whatever amount of respect that they could even with the spec of respect that and they could find on the grounds of themselves left both before they lose all of their I don't know how they still have anybody who listens to them at all but they try to salvage what reputation have left with the people that they've brainwashed enough to continue to listen to them but I do and I hear right this all coming to a legal had and there is now the steel dossier and the Hillary Clinton campaign is now being find 100 and something thousand dollars over there real Russian is no disinformation campaigns they try to go against trump it in our seeing that the truth is coming out in there trying to backpedal enough to try to salvage whatever reputation they have with the brainwashed people that continue to listen to them so now we're going to look at is it rockers news and they talked about how the White House won't rule out Bidens party her pardon contact his party probably has a lot of parties I would death us judging by his laptop but trying to rule out it will not rule out Biden's pardon for son or his brother so says presidential spokesperson dodges questions about hundred Biden probe after laptop info resurfaces does the White House repeatedly refused on Friday to rule out the possibility that Pres. Joe Biden could pardon his son Hunter Biden or Brother James Barton if suspected financial crimes related to business dealings in China are proven in court despite questions from multiple journalists in the growing volume of articles on the subject it says quote that's not a hypothetical I'm going to entertain said White House news communication director Kate Bedingfield who she told a room full of journalists after she was asked whether the president had considered a pardon for his son Hunter or brother James both of whom are being investigated for financial and property impropriety put regarding a business deal with Chinese energy firm at CFC China energy which is even mentioned the Prisma situation asked about the president's continued insistence that there was nothing unethical and that joke Hunter Biden had made no money from this thing about what you are talking about China Bedingfield double down on the elder brother Biden's denial which was made over a year earlier that his son was guilty of any wrongdoing we absolutely stand by the president, and she said insisting that she did not have anything to add from this podium when the question was phrased another way Hunter Biden is currently being investigated by the Justice Department regarding a business deal he was involved in with China proof of which surfaced almost 2 years ago on the infamous laptop from hell left by back by him and the laptop repair shop in Delaware the younger Biden appeared to have raked in millions of dollars for a consulting role despite insisting the deal itself fell through in his Chinese partner in the affair was later detained in China while a handful of media outlets initially reported on the content of the laptop which included not only incriminating financial documents also more siliceous materials including images of Hunter engaged in sexual acts and drug use most major press Alex gave the pass either dismissing it as Russian propaganda without any evidence or refusing to comment on the the president in famously infamously laughed when asked about the laptop again after the election however with Biden safely in the White House mainstream outlets at from the New York Times to CNN have begun to nibble at the story acknowledging not only that the laptop along hundred by whether there are some serious problems with the business skills discussed in emails contained so will not rule out his pardon for his son's know-how in the in the world can the president pardon his own children for doing back deal shady deals with China or Russia or Ukraine which were all included in their when he was elected under the guise it in that the money came for him right he was the one that is he if he has to pardon the sons he can have to pardon his damn self because he was the reason that they even had access to these situations to begin with right the only reason that Hunter Biden and James Biden which of them heard that name really before had access to China had access to Ukraine was because they were pushing and peddling his their father's influence the vice president I stay to the time and knowingly at a strong political proponent in the United States who could get things done within the political spectrum SMEs and a lot of political spectrum political sphere political arena whatever it is right we know that the only reason they had the opportunity to to give these deals into make this money was because of their father who was elected based on this being Russian disinformation right is like two thirds of people said that it would've sway their vote on the Democratic side if the laptop was deemed true how in the world he that's the part of himself he can just pardon his sons E the department not only Hunter not only James but you thought also have to pardon himself and if he has to do that than he is not fit to be president he was being utilized by China and Ukraine and for business dealings and in that little if he recalled Ukraine's intuition but were about to dive into a little bit more of why this laptop even has a conversation around Ukraine on which even there's an article right here this is Hunter Biden emails backup Ukraine BioLab claims we know that Biden was that the only reason that they had these business deals with it in the in the in shows in Bidens herb Hunter Biden's laptop where he says that 50% of all money he makes goes to Joe goes to the big guy he talks about right we know these things and the only reason he can pardon them is because he became present and became present because of these back and shady deals that he was doing on behalf of his sons which are going to have to be pardoned because her to go to jail for peddling their father's influence was now the most influential man in the world so on that note let's go into a deep deep dive of what was actually on that laptop right no I'm to be reading this from a subsector in the sub stack is Jessica Reed Krause Jessica REE D KR AUS her sub stack she goes into a great number of detail on all of us which includes evidence of addictions affairs incest over seals overseas dealings and corrupt media coverups within under Biden's laptop so it says the Hunter Biden email cover up may not only be the most contemptible example of the modern political media's corruption but it is most probably the most demonstratably which is by the New York Post the lack of curiosity for most of the media is repellent and really corrupt I think the dam is about to burst that was by Miranda the Wien so this says in late 2020 just as the presidential election was coming to a head news of Hunter Biden's discarded laptop broke only to be quickly dismissed as a Russian hoax by nearly every major outlet in mainstream media the laptop was said to contain evidence of extreme depravity as well as emails text messages photos financial documents detailing how Hunter uses political leverage to help him and his father profit overseas and corrupt secret dealings waged with companies in Ukraine and China the extent of the scorn of the shut down by media was of course aided by big tech particularly Facebook and Twitter whose combined efforts to silence block and censor the story helps quash it as soon as it started to gain the kind of momentum that could possibly sway an election across the board was deemed dangerous misinformation TicTac going so far as to punish anyone who tried to share the news of it on Twitter by locking them out of their accounts for extended periods of time with others across the board Facebook Instagram twitter everywhere every media outlet echoed the same dismissive statements Jen Sasaki even tweeted the political story titled Hunter Biden story is Russian this info thousands of formal Intel official say in nearly every mainstream media outlet talk to the political story and ran with it now it shows the tweet says why have you seen any stories from NPR about the Newark posts Hunter by the story read more in this week's newsletter we don't want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories assessed by NPR and we don't want to waste the listeners and readers time on stories that are just pure distractions okay and downsize the Senate and Sen. Marsha Blackburn which was the same Sen. who really grilled Canton conducted what is it Ketanji Brown Jackson and the new Supreme Court justice about what is a woman if you recall that name was Senator Blackburn who tweeted Hunter Biden's laptop was always real the mainstream media and big tax silenced you for talking about it anyways the article goes on to say when I saw back then when I was allowed to see back then was the least troublesome contents of the laptop mostly images of Hunter partying in hotel with hotel Hooker slumped in the bathtub smoking a cigarette passed out in bed with a crack piping out of his mouth they were gross improve the sad state of his addiction but I didn't see anything criminal while I'm in smoking crack pits is criminal but 7.3 extent of my political allegiance by this time is lymphoid is all but anyone who is half a brain knew that this has been one of Trump's kids caught with the crack pipe the media would have pounced on it flooding us with headlines in the blue it wouldn't of been able to escape if we try why I wondered header coverage become so unbalanced and why didn't anyone I know seem to really care I spent the majority of trumps presidency listening and believing in all of the Russian collusion accusations assuming they were true because it's all we heard from reputable news sources nearly 4 years later however it was proven false I heard it was nothing for media retractions curing them of his charges charges many today still believe is true 18 months later the laptop is in the first confirmed by the same news outlets who helped Chavarria exposing the real purveyors of this information all those who failed to do their journalistic duty and investigate it any further the fact that the story was not followed up on during 2020 will go down as one of the most glaring examples of criminal tendencies embraced by modern journalists who continue to choose party ties over the quest for truth that previously defines the role in society was interesting to me because you like you hear about the way the journalist or look at surveys like you know it's looked at like this like Crimea gross job now as it should be like in it in the way that our mainstream media has looked at you know we we look at journalist and if you look back click towards the 70s and 80s like think about comic books rightly think about Marvel think about like the way that journalists were looked at like hard-nosed cigarette smoking truth defining journalists who would like go after people mortised afraid of anything and wouldn't you know chase you down in the parking lot like real James O'Keefe project Veritas style OG journalists were like where was a cool job right like boots on the ground in in a different country at figuring out the truth sit down with you know the tally band like hearing them in like putting your life on the line and now Genoa services like little sissies and Twitter saying whatever the hell you know George Soros puts down the domain streamlined effort for what they should be saying about things that's not journalism right in journalism should be about the truth like if you are a good journalist in today's society should be easily rising to the top right through sub stack through whatever it is like there there are many many different ways for you to get your messages out there in the right way and in you will eventually build an audience based on truth based on facts based on you know your personality based on the things that you say based on everything you can you can build an audience around the truth and in that's what people are hungry for people are so sick of listening to journalists who who can barely you know say anything other than the script that put in front of them in front of the TV like ever every news commentator and that's kind of why like the hill was because is not fully scripted you can see in the way that their discussions and panels ours is not scripted is not that the reading from a Teleprompter but every word literally did this by drives me nuts sometimes but that's because you know if it is just they don't have the best takes on everything all the time but their truthful takes and you can tell it from the dialogue in the way that they have these conversations so I appreciate that so it's it's decent journalism but but the way that journalists are looked at today is like they are the purveyors of disinformation they are the minister of truth right of the 1984 George Orwellian perspective they are the the Ministry of truth in everything that they say is actually a lie and so there needs to be a new wave of journalism through these like disassociated individuals on you know whether it's tick-tock platform sub stack whatever it is who come out with the truth on these things you know what there's a few that I really like to follow like somebody asked me what are what are my platforms I follow there's a few like Atlas news generally is a good one real news nobles to rebel news I follow if you like that that are really in group good boots on the ground smaller entities that tell the truth about things and incorrect themselves when the wrong because they are interested in the truth or not interested in narratives not interested in the corporate greed that comes down from these in a political elitists or oligarchs who control the mainstream narrative on things and they were gonna see those start to take over as time goes on we him in the hopefully they don't get bought out like we saw with like Newsmax and away and then in all those ones that we like hoped would be the new you know the truth powers right I think it's in a be an individual level Ray I think that's where the value is of it on so anyways let's also how to move on to this this or it will be here for five hours on the fifth for the fact that the story was not followed up under 2020 will go down as one of the most glaring examples of criminal tendencies embraced by modern journalists who continue to push or choose to party ties of the quest for truth is previous defined by their own society guilty of creating further suspicion especially among conservatives called crazy for demanding investigations laptop after were to go anyways once you realize how calculated the media cover up was it starts to resemble an Epstein style operation at the CCP ran on Hunter Biden in order to gain control over Joe Biden which could mean the Biden administration is already compromised via the CCP blackmail related to the sex tapes and who knows what else a fact the media blatantly chose to ignore since the story is picking up speed again now that CNN the post and New Yorker among others have come forth to confirm his legitimacy we are finally allowed to revisit the story when it appears to frame the Biden family is a severely corrupt incestuous bunch that might be more indebted to China than anyone dared to let us believe now here's a video of Joe Rogan detailing the median big tax calculated cover-up of the story in 2020 the Twitter shut down the post account for 16 days and left any users who tried to share the newspaper story in here that is the New York Times just now is admitting that the Hunter Biden laptop is real and now we remember from the debates with Tromp bring it up to Biden and Biden saying it's bull shared in these intelligence is a lie flat out lie everybody knew it was a lie the New York Post had that story that was banned from Twitter which was just outright crazy that one of the oldest newspapers in the country yeah I don't I don't think it was to go back and apologize to know no one's apologize rural all longer all says high-profile podcast or Joe Rogan has lambasted the news media and mainstream media in the US for ignoring the hundred Biden laptop story last week in reporting on hundred Bidens tax blows the New York Times confirmed that emails from the hundred binds laptop discarded laptop were authentic and again continues 100 vines laptop has been a source of speculation since the story was first reported in the late 2020 smart so don't care about that notices Bidens beginning this officer this takes you through like almost all of this can be an extensive deep dive into this laptop and I'll see if her in a probably skim over some of it is a so large but I will include it in this week's podcast companion so you can check this out this is truly the best most deep dive that I've seen into the laptop itself so here it is assessed binds beginning the Biden legacy as most of us know come sleep with grief and tragedy beginning with the horrific accident that killed his wife and daughter during his first bid for the Senate swearing in for a seat took place next to the bedside of his healing sons who lost their mother in their beloved little sister while really is looks like it is at the hospital on Sunday by and takes his oath in office from US Senate Sec. Frank value in 1973 his father-in-law Robert Hunter and Sue son Joseph Bo Biden are at his side in both hospital room tragedy would strike again during Joe Biden Stennis VP when his oldest son Bo was diagnosed with brain cancer in August 2013 and underwent treatment that was initially successful but failed to cure and when the cancer resurfaced the same year shortly after his those death hundred by to begin having an affair with his grieving sister-in-law Hallie leading to his divorce from his wife Kathleen whom he has three daughters with then talk about the affair and hundred vines autobiography beautiful things he explains that it was text messages between him and how he discovered on the iPad the first tipped off his wife causing her to finally divorce him in the book he admits that the final straw that was the final straw for Kathleen and she had tried for years to help him be his addiction to crack cocaine and alcohol but then she found out he was sleeping with his brothers his dad brothers wife she said he was always a sicko when the story was about the affair first broke via page 600 patient contacted his dad begging him to offer a statement in support of the relationship which he did Joe Biden said we are all lucky the hunter and how we found each other as they were putting their lives together again after such sadness while I'm really happy that my dead son's wife is now dating my other son who divorced his wife and his three kids basically over her dating his dad brothers wife is the present AI states defending they have mine and my wife Jill's full and complete support and we are happy for them the book also reported Hunter Biden's a five month sex and drug vendor in Los Angeles right after his marriage fell part no it goes on to say that Kathleen filed for divorce in December 6, 2016 legend in court documents that during the separation which began several months after Bo died Hunter created financial concerns the family by spending extravagantly on his own interests including drugs alcohol prostitute strip clubs and guesser women with whom he had sexual relations does her divorce was finalized in 2017 after which he and Hallie affiant briefly lived together in Maryland before they broke up and he moved back to Los Angeles well crazy it also discusses Hunter's affair with his brothers wife his pictures here showing all that know the laptop timeline so will go through all of this hundred Biden drops off his computer at the repair shop in 2019 here. He fails to return it in over 90 days which means the computable logs legally to Isaac after browsing to the pedophiles Isaac becomes alarmed by the content he finds on and because the FBI who eventually takes possession of it subpoenas issued on summer nights by US Attorney Leslie Wolf as he fears for her safety and so he gives a copy of binds laptop hard drive to Rudy Giuliani's attorney Brian Costello and two of his friends in case something happens to him by mid October 2020 in your post begins releasing under Bidens emails and other information leaked from laptop October 15, 2020 House Republicans send a letter to FBI director requesting answers about the computer it becomes clear that the FBI sitting on the computer and its contents Rudy Giuliani begins providing regular updates on his findings and TV interview speaking out about the authenticity of emails no disturbing details involving images and videos of child pornography sexual situations with minors one of whom prop prominently featured he says is a member of Biden's family which ended up being his niece his brother's daughter with whom he was having the sexual conversations with the videos and pictures of the emails not only incriminate Hunter but also proves Joe lied about his knowledge of Hunter's corrupt involvement with Ukrainian feelings were the promise of access to Joe Biden is used as a bargaining leverage which quotes in light of ongoing questions about the credibility of these claims and multiple reports that the FBI's investigating the veracity law enforcement is referring to the matter to the FBI spokesman or person for Delaware State police told Newsweek the decision comes in wake of a recent interview that former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani individual who initially obtained the hard drive did with Newsmax TV during the interview Giuliana claimed there was explicit footage of underage girls on the hard drive along with suggestions and tax measures logs from the drive that Hunter had faced timed naked with a 14-year-old girl and that girl being his own and here is that clip with Rudy Giuliani I agree with you I think the American people due to search now and I was sort of one of the reasons twitters claimed they had the authority to censor this is because of your proximity to present obviously your supporter of his reelection campaign and they they were curious how you came into possession of this hard drive in the first place the Jews who were Steve Bannon or any of the other people supporting the president have any prior contact with this Mac shop owner prior to him reaching out to you know I mean first of all leave the premise on which I think twitter took it down was an attack with a dead wrong wasn't hacked so that a lie stay shut it without knowing which means you just pull the lie out of the air you this is really part of the conspiracy with Biden Avenue and Biden when it was first put the story abide wrote a letter to all the media which he thinks he controls and told to keep me off you imagine a candidate writing a letter sent to keep somebody off how frightened is the of me plus they spent the last eight or nine months attacking the everywhere they can and every one of the little surrogate operations that they own like the Washington Post and defendant in New York times and CNN and MSNBC and the whole crew of that not even brought Kevin a patient like Pravda was to the Soviet union they just published the Democratic talking points sometimes even use the same keywords you can figure it out the pathetic admit it really is a terrible thing so the way I came to have this my my warrior was contacted by this gentleman who owns this store written fixes hard drives and divided coming to the store probably a year earlier turned over three devices to guide couldn't fix one fix the other immediately and had to keep the Hard Dr., Hunter Biden came back in two days and brought him some kind of a some kind of a keyboard that would help and was in itself a short period of time he had a fiction that he started calling by to pick it up to get oriented couldn't get any response to get paid for some reason Hunter Biden never showed up at one of the reasons may be that the judge the gentleman says that Hunter Biden was so drunk the had a little trouble in getting his name and since I've now looked at the hard drives I have find that to be very credible because this was probably a bit of an exaggeration it looks like is high on crack about every other day for the last five or six years before we move on I do want to backup settings again another criticism is of the timeline that this was released to study drop this off about a year ago I think I want to the screenshots of the quote from the back shop said no they basically have the right to you know take any property that's not claim within 90 days no 90 days there's a lot of time in between that in the year so why is this just coming out now will because they gave it to the FBI okay the FBI took it the FBI agent Jolie FBI agent he was afraid he was afraid of consequences so he might be this this this man he didn't give you guys a copy of the hard drive and pass of the axle are directly at go get it I first got Betty waited for five months might think you held onto it we held onto for EL Londa Ford copies of it he gave to the friends in his gaze he was killed and he was of any other Olaf people deserve this yeah this is the presidency is at stake here we have some very dangerous people about their of so no live in a more force long enough to know the unit left that of the door the reality is he kept for copy she gave to the friends occasion he was killed he waited about four months five but I'm not sure because my my words one talk about this some reciting what Bob told and then he sent some letters around to various of Republicans thinking they'd be interested in and apparently we were the first was my and or was the only one respond to the first of whatever and my lawyer Bob distiller who is a former assistant US attorney former chief of the criminal division represented George Steinbrenner very very excellent lawyer made contact with him went down to visit with them spent a good deal of time on the say a week studying it making sure that was legal what he saw was a contract signed by Hunter Biden which said form contract signed by Hunter Biden that said that if he if he didn't pick it up in 90 days that would be abandoned become the property of the merchant had been abandoned at that point by about six months it was clear with the property the owner of the of the merchant he checked the lore on that to be sure and then he then he went over to do the best he could to validate it number three to check on eventually he knew was he accurate about it with fine Acrobat Ashley would it really valid until I got it because although he knew more about the hard drive I know the case back and forwards right I have an enormous amount of information from confidential informant so for example I could see dates there that only hunted by the because they have been published anywhere I'll give you an example confidential informant told us about a meeting at the State Department he gave me a specific date he told me remembered it because divide was taken in the back door so that would be registered he went to see Deputy Secretary of State Tony blanket let's not out registered anywhere except from this confidential informant telling me another investigator this and that day squared exactly with the date in the in the hard drive in the text message about three more like that there are two others that I'd rather not reveal that was the vice president at that meeting at State Farm and you know for sure was in a meeting with the vice president is made with the Deputy Secretary of State is not recorded and should have been recorded because it's her meeting the falls under the foreign agents registration act of which there are probably about six or seven blatant violations of it by Hunter Biden including the meeting with the vice president he never registered as a foreign agent that's exactly what Paul metaphor went to prison for unless we really can stick with this no Republicans go to prison and Democrats don't when they do the same or worse than a bone to present the Whipple manifold beyond beyond beyond that as you go through it tickle me to go through the photographs it's obviously his nobody else would have that horrible disgusting I can't even describe so not exactly depicting 14 your rope and I'm sure we'll get more into that says the years there is a sexual depravity to this this disgusting Julianna Giuliani told Newsmax the depravity that's horrendous which is why I reported it to the Delaware police there is under age girls are these underage girls were not protected there are numerous pictures of girls that are being I mean they should be there if you go or stay please don't do anything about this would really be a tragic thing the mort majority of these leaked images emails and videos from the hard drive starts are colluding in late 2020 when the story was first breaking many outlets of time were offering proof of its validity but I shut down or silenced as a result the photos today are hard to find many of them have been wiped off the Internet entirely images I saw but did not include here were horrifying frames of a young Asian child in a hotel room dressed up in lace lingerie in videos of sex acts with what appear to be 14 to 15-year-old girls now there showing a bunch of pictures of Hunter Biden naked and him snorting what seems to be cocaine off of a strippers ass kicked the initials all these pictures right here on the subject they are censored up so please don't shoot the messenger and the video from 20 1900 by the claims Russian drug dealer still one of his laptops for blackmail while he was drugged out in a Vegas hotel room back in 2018 these the infamous images showing him asleep in the bathtub with a crack pipe in a video obtained by daily Mail hunter is shown sitting naked in bed with a prostitute after filming a sex tape explain how he believes his laptop was stolen for blackmail purposes this being one of three laptops he is lost each of them said that contain sensitive information on Pres. Joe Biden in addition to documenting his drug and sex fuel binges Noah quotes I spent crazy sucking amounts of money Hunter set I was with these guys the one guy was not like you anyways each night he be like there was going to be so many people here crazy talking party and each night it's nobody they have videos of me doing this he said referring to the filmed sex he just finished they have videos of me doing crazy laughing Saxe Effingham you know now let's see the logic and our talks about the footage reportedly showing hundred by confessing up to prostitute now I don't know if this video will see if there's actual looks like he's Bill actually show or discussed bizarrely zero quicker it will go to jail under our forfeiture statutes what is our show there is Joe Biden showing the hypocrisy of this doesn't actually show the conversation of talking about Noah also says hundreds claims the video raise the probability that he was targeted during this type of drug binges is infernal vulnerable conduit to Joe Biden as part of a four intelligence operation likely the individuals responsible for the leak content be seen thus far now this is the same content if this is true according to Hunter Biden himself saying that he got taken over by Russian people during one of these drug binges that they took his laptop and this is the same information that Trump is now calling and prudent to release say just release a man you got the information why are you waiting release the information let the people know show him what you know right now he is getting called out by the mainstream media for you know calling on prudent to release information about the part yet he's the president if you have his black male put out there let them know right let the people know with what they got themselves into right Noah says asking cousin for 24-year-old model do you want foreign or domestic Carolyn S Hunter at one point before adding I can't give you an F in Asian sorry I'm not doing it next to messages from understated domesticated foreigner and is find the next message reads no so this is a picture of him standing by some beautiful 24-year-old looking model and now he responds and what are the text messages directly from the laptop she's a legend none of these women are except for diva but Nicola and Dave and Ella and Lucy will all know quality girls were like I am distrusting and highly highly wary of evil I also have Denise a German 26 now this is to abide in her to yet to Hunter note to Lucy I think okay so fine do you want foreign or domestic Hunter says and you have to make the pitch directly she says I can't give you Athanasian sorry I'm not doing it now I wonder if that's Kiefer's on the else why would she not want Asian or compared Russian or whatever maybe that's Kiefer you know younger domesticated foreigner is fine I give you Isabella but she has kids and in acts and be a husband he said no yellow Jasmina is the next thing she says she doesn't separate tax threads racial slurs including the N-word are tossed around between the two interesting maybe that should be thrown around when you talk about you Joe Rogan Santa maybe talk about hundred back in Sandy and work the Telluride and says now let's move on here it goes on to talk about kind of what family means to them and in text messages between Natalie and Hunter basically saying that she told pop that she would call the police if she if I tried to see you when she lies and says she never said that call pop and ask him so this a single source for revolver than about one third of the images are of some underage girl some of the images are topless while in others she is known shown in suggestive positions with Hunter himself revolver source who saw the photos also claim that the illicit photos and hundreds laptop were of a member of the Biden family same as Giuliani stated unconfirmed rumors pain the figure on the photos is Natalie Brown Hallie's daughter the same Hallie who he dated after who is the wife of his dead brother so not only did he was screwing the wife of his dead brother within weeks of him dying what he was also allegedly taking pictures videos soliciting naked images with the 14-year-old daughter of Hallie like how disgusting is this family no 800 pages of text messages sent or received by Hunter Biden from 2018 2019 repeatedly reveals that his former love interest Hallie the widow of his brother Bo claimed he behaved in a sexually inappropriate way around a minor family member Hunter Biden told his sister Ashley Biden that Hallie described him as being sexually inappropriate with a minor female female family member the text revealed that most members of hundred by family seem to know about these allegations among his family members are hunters parents of Joe Biden and Joe Biden's sister Ashley Biden and Jim Biden the brother of Joe Biden in some cases for members decided to take Hunter site of the apparent family argument over the allegations choosing to believe him over Hallie previous reporting pertaining to the situation with comments by predominant pundit Candace Owens and Republican Lauren bulbar have claimed that the teenage relative in question is Natalie Biden is hesitant to watch a video or expression changes at the six second mark when the girl is asked to define what family means to them and they show the actual pictures of him with Natalie in a bad and shows that text message that I read earlier and then it goes on the show the Texans just call your mother it seems every time we talk she tells people I'm inappropriate with you and this is a text message to the 14-year-old I don't want to make matters worse for you or myself now she responds later this has call you in 30 minutes thanks for chatting nice night Raza this life is just real torture he says to this 14-year-old yes it seems like an endless test of my sanity to Haiti is much as do right now is beyond dangerous Blake won't let me see blank without my father present can you F and imagine that that F up that I having shielded for two years and taken all that he is keeping me from talking to her being around blank Dennis is telling people I'm sexually inappropriate with her daughter and these are all text messages right from left if any one of you ever repeat that again I swear to God you might as well put the gun to my head that yourself because if all the tabloids who lived to Dick with me anyways were trippy rumor that came from blank that that's why I can't come home I will not survive that no one could survive that she is stupid and she is reckless and she is evil and if you can't give her there get her to see her own self interest is never saying that again as a reason I'm not allowed to be alone with what looks like Natalie's name which is poured out connecting details are apparently in a fume images one being the phone case shown in one of the videos with a girl hands her phone to Hunter the case matches the one that Natalie is holding the holding in the photograph previously shared in social media and other girl video a girl is seen giving Hunter a quote unquote fudge up with two tiny scars visible on her ankle matching Natalie's in the third instance the location of one of Biden's videos matches the same hotel location tagged Natalie shares the following morning in a photo photo she posted of her breakfast plate Gross disgusting now it shows all of the data here area shows her location it shows that blurred out images and it shows the picture of the breakfast it shows the timestamps it shows all of this now earlier we talked about Hunter Biden's association with Malia Obama now this is unconfirmed but highly speculated they revolves around ape image of a debit card that was shown with Molly's name on it make from saying that rights are no you know yet Malia Malia a Obama a Jeep J.P. Morgan Chase credit card which seemingly has cocaine on right next to cocaine lines doesn't one of the leaked photos from late 2020 Hunter Biden is racking up a line of blow with a credit card at the West at the hotel in West Hollywood the name on the card was Malia Obama now online sluice suggest the birthmark of Molly is five matches the one on the girl photographed that he is screwing from behind shown in various sexual poses with Hunter Biden so the thing that's showing here is that Hunter Biden was allegedly having sex with the daughter of Obama Barack Obama's daughter Hunter Biden was having sex with her in also doing cocaine with her in a hotel room and he is far younger than her pretty sure he's was she was friends with his daughter this is all discussed it and so they show the images of her birthmark the birthmark of the girl that he is having sex with from behind from his laptop now is a speculative one that has not been confirmed but that has a lot of pretty much evidence shown right by that credit card no Lexi will touch on is the emails right were getting to respond to this the emails China and recurring ties in the big in these uncovered emails Joe Biden is alleged to have met with Ukrainian Russian in Kazakhstan he and business associates of the sun and a private dining room in the plush Café Milano in April 16, 2015 one email suggests that on at least one occasion Hunter arranged a meeting between Joe Amber is my boss not even attempt the name Valium I guess I am fit for the month pulls our ski charisma was paying Hunter $83,000 a month to be unsupportive time which hardly makes sense considering his lapse of experience in the basically any field the president's family according these emails were supposed to get equity in the Chinese energy firm that Hunter arranged Biden reportedly thinks Tony Belinsky who is tasked with setting up the family's joint venture with Chinese firm CEF C for his service quote on quote for helping quote and quote my son the secret meeting lasted 45 minutes in May 2017 less than two weeks later an email sent to Hunter Biden outline the provisional agreement that included 10% equity in the energy company for the big guy later identified as Joe Biden other documents detail several payments from a company in China suggesting some of the prophet was intended for other Biden family members the New York Times also reported that Hunter paid off a significant tax liability after he was probed by the FBI over alleged money laundering in his ties to China interesting initials email that says at the moment there's provisional agreement that the equity will be distributed as following 20 to H which is a simile Hunter 20 to our W 20 2JG 20 2T be 10 to Jim his brother and 10 held by H for the big guy? Now that is what I have so far on the hunter by the laptop so I hope that that was interesting for you it was quite interesting for me now if you want to lead that whole thing yourself I will go ahead and include it on this week's podcast companion which can be found other sub stack which is rental revolution.subsector.com I will include that whole article in the sub stack this week for you and all the images all the conversations all of that right in the sub stack for you okay now nice and easy to do is go head to the patriot on provide dollars you will get not only the full video episode that you can watch this see my beautiful face for quality since you also get access to this court server which is growing by the day talk about these conversations with like-minded people in a safe space for us to discuss all of these conversations together about every single episode not just this episode every episode of the passing go back to watching a different episode and talk about those things that nobody else you also get bonus content which will include the conversation that I'm about to have with you about Ashley Biden's diary which is a timely bring up at this time where she basically says that she was having inappropriate showers and relations with her father who also happens to be president of the states so head over to patriotic.com/read Hill revolt and you will be able to hear the bonus content for this week which will be all about Ashley Biden Speight diary which I will start in just a moment now the next interview if you haven't already subscribed five star review and if you could head over to give Sango.com/red pill revolution and give a donation whether to dollar five dollars $100 $1000 hundred thousand dollars know if you want to put me on the board for 10% of your company you can tell me the big guy for purposes I spend so much time on this guys I spend so much time and this is why the Instagram thing was so disappointing to me but I will build back even better build that better for you all what I can only do that with your help so please consider going to give Sango.com/reptile revolution as a Christian giving website and you can donate right there I would appreciate it so much I spend a ton of time editing a ton of time on these episodes researching reading I'm in so much time on all of this I would appreciate it so much if you could go and just give whatever it is that this means to you now we are going to move on over to the set or to the patriot for the bonus content of this week which we all about Ashley Biden's diary I read through the whole diary hundred and 12 pages to go over this with you guys going to be specifically talking about a few of the pages but go had patriot on.com/red pill revolution and you will get the full conversation surrounding Ashley Biden's diary if you listen to it at this point to this point should be worth five dollars for you to listen to the rest of it and you can actually even add the RSS feed right to your I guess favorite podcast player and you get it right to your pocket or your favorite podcast player every single week Amelia had to go over to the patron every week and will go directly to your I guess player so patron.com/rep revolution it's five dollars for the bonus content and if you pay the $15 you will doing an additional episode every single week that is live user submitted conversations and topics right so without further ado here we go...