The Adams Archive

In this week's episode, we have a discussion with Mitchell Gerber, an investigative journalist who has dedicated 22 years to exposing crimes against humanity happening in China. With a resilient character and a determined mind, he has been working hard on the frontline of a significant cause, which has been coined a “New form of evil.” Mitchell has been traveling the world in a crucial attempt to raise awareness about the crimes currently occurring against certain religious groups resulting in horrific acts of violence by the country's own government. 

Resources:

https://faluninfo.net/

  http://faluninfo.net/why-persecution/   

http://www.stoporganharvesting.org/  

https://endtransplantabuse.org/  

https://chinatribunal.com/  

Subscribe and leave a 5-star review!

----more----

 📍  

Hello, and welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams and thank you so much for joining me today. Today. We have an incredible, incredible. Conversation with a journalist that goes by the name of Mitchell Gerber and Mitchell Gerber has been on a long journey almost 23 years. Now that he has been following the atrocities that are going on in China surrounding the Lanng movement.

If you are not familiar with what the Lanng movement is, it is an ideological and spiritual movement that took over, took over the country until a point in 1999, when it was completely outlawed by the Chinese communist party. Since that outlaw, they have been rounding up millions and millions of LAN gone practitioners, sending them to more than 2000, what they call hospitals.

But what has been recently deemed to be concentration camps in the wake of the Uyghur Muslim news reporting that has come up recently, but the Lanng movement has been going on for what seems like a much longer time to a lot more people. And it is far less talked about. So I hope you enjoyed this conversation.

Uh, Mitchell Gerber is an incredible journalist and incredible speaker and breaks down the movement very well for us from your ideology, what's going on, who is doing it, how the United States partake in some of these things. And so let me kind of just talk you through Mitchell's bio here. He's an investigative journalist who has dedicated more than 22 years to exposing this organ harvesting of the Falen gong spiritual movement.

He has been working hard on the front lines of a significant cause, which has been coined a new form of evil Mitchell has been traveling the world in a crucial attempt to raise awareness about the forced organ harvesting of the Fain gong in China, where hundreds of thousands of these innocent practitioners have been sent to those state mandated hospitals that I just discussed with you, their organs cut out of their bodies while alive.

The organs sent for massive profit to the Chinese communist party and the bodies burned in cremator. To conceal the evidence. There was a 2019 tribunal, which we will touch on and even listen to a little bit.  where the tribunal gets together and compiles a ton of evidence on this and determines that this horrific human atrocity has been going on for far too long.

And this was back in 2019, and there's still very little conversation around it. This is something we absolutely need to draw awareness to. We also discuss a few current events and some other topics as well, but I really hope that you gain some insight into this atrocity from this conversation. Uh, I appreciate you so much.

If you could go ahead and hit that subscribe. Button takes two seconds of your time. Right now, join the conversation. We're gonna be continuing these interviews. I hope to be doing them every couple weeks or so at the beginning. And then making them more consistent as time goes on about all sorts of incredible topics that you guys will be interested in while continuing our weekly discussion on current events, social, political, and culture topics.

So again, I appreciate you so much hit that subscribe button, leave a five star review. If you've been enjoying this podcast, or if you gain some insight from this, it just helps me get up in the rankings, helps the podcast grow, helps other people see it. Um, so again, go ahead and leave a five star review.

I appreciate you so much head over to red pill, revolution.co. You can get all of our content there, all of the social channels, all of the podcast. You can even go ahead and hit the, uh, sign up for, if you go down to the menu, you can sign up for life insurance directly through me. It costs nothing to get a quote, nobody's gonna call you not me, not my buddy, not any random insurance agent, but you are signing up directly with me.

So if you need some life insurance, you want to cover your butt in case you die and not leave your family with a bunch of debt. It takes two seconds. I was offered a $2 million policy for less than 60. It was like $60 a month. Um, so really, really great rates and you will not get a single phone call, which is usually a very big issue in the insurance world.

And again, you're signing up directly under my license. This is not a third party ad. So red pill revolution.co.com is for losers. And without further ado, let's jump into it. Episode 42 of the red pill revolution podcast with a great conversation with Mitchell Gerber.

 📍  

How did you decide to get involved into this. 

It's uh, quite a long story, you know, in 2001, I was studying international business at the university of Georgia and I was partying a lot. I was drinking a lot. I was very stressed out. I was handling a lot of, uh, uh, business clubs. I was, uh, inventory manager at the college of, uh, business at the university of Georgia.

I originally come from South Africa, origin. My ancestors or my family were from Ukraine and Lithuania. And then they fled the Nazi occupation into South Africa. That's where I was born. Moved to America, became the first in my family, Austin to become an American citizen. And while I was at university, I was always fascinated by the Eastern way, by Marshall arts, by K Fu and karate from the Japanese, uh, way of life to the Indian way of life, to the Chinese, uh, Eastern way of breeding yoga and, um, uh, Chiang and, and Taichi.

And one afternoon they had a beautiful festival with all these music, uh, uh, musicians, arts and crafts, and one booth struck my interests. And I went up with a friend of mine who was attend the university with. Her her father was actually the president of Porsche. Uh, and he was managing all these operations of, of, of Porsche the, the car internationally.

And she was also very interesting intrigued in meditation, yoga. And I went up to this booth and I thought to myself, oh, this is very interesting. Fallen, go fallen DFA, a self-improvement meditation and mind and body practice incorporating five exercises. And I thought, wow, this is pretty interesting. So I went into the, um, I, I saw these, uh, Chinese people Mo uh, exercising and practicing, and I was very intrigued.

I was very attracted to the energy and the frequency, cuz I I'm a very sensitive person and I'm a very empathic person and, and intuitive person. And I just enjoyed the traditional. Values and, and missis of the spiritual movement that was deeply rooted in Buddhism, deeply rooted in, in Chinese meditation, yoga, namely fallen DFA, also known as fallen go.

So I went and tried out the exercises and immediately, I just felt after practicing the first exercise, which incorporates stretching techniques, the whole I'm blocking of my body. I felt all my, without my traps down my back just popping. And I'm like, what the fuck the hell is going on in my body, man?

And I just felt very relieved. I felt a wave of energy. My whole body started to feel warm and I felt I could. I, I was, my whole body just opened up in a very short amount of time. And that's what intrigued me because I've usually done yoga meditation. Tachi um, I'm very active when it comes to Jim. I love Jim I'm 42 years old, but I'm, it's very important to keep a well healthy state of mind, state of body and state of spirit spirit, very important in this day and time, especially, you really want to keep your body as a temple, you know, clean and clearer and focused and, and.

So I thought, wow, this is pretty interesting. So I went back to the booth after, uh, feeling blissed out, doing the five exercises. They just took us through the motions, maybe about 10, 15 minutes. Um, and coming back, I felt very refreshed, very light and, and uncomfortable. But then I looked to the side and I'm like, what the hell is this?

I was a kind of talk, taken back and creeped up by the, the, the, all these pictures of, um, um, these Chinese people being tortured and persecuted. And it said on the top of the, of the, of, of the, um, the, the billboard board, they had these, all these billboards stop or posters, stop, help, stop the brutal persecution of innocent fallen gang or fall for practitioners in China.

And I thought to myself, well, what's going on here? You have a beautiful spiritual movement, peaceful, comfortable.  exercises. And then you have this whole, other side of the dock side of these people being killed and persecuted in China. So I want to know, and I really found out what was going on. So, 

so did you find yourself kind of navigating right from that moment?

Or did you kind of figure like, kind of become aware of it and put it on the wayside and then start to pursue it later in life? Or was it like, kind of like from that moment you realized that it was something that you wanted to, to dive deeper into and dedicate a portion of your 

life to, from that moment, something hits you in life?

I was man. I was destined for an investment firm money. I mean, my father invested a lot of money on. But something hit you deep down inside. And what hit me was social work. I always was a social worker. I always was a, tried to be a humanitarian ever since I was in elementary school to, to high school, to college.

I always loved helping people, but something ignited me inside that I had to go on a crusade to expose this evil to the world and validate and support this spiritual movement that gave me such incredible health and people thought I was crazy. I was like, why are you giving up all this money, fame, fortune power, beautiful woman to go on a crusade that no one really gives a crap about million miles away.

It has moments to do with you or anybody else. Why do you care so much? Because I said to myself and when I felt inside and I, and I, and what I shared with them to fail, to support what is good and to fail, to expose what is evil is unacceptable. And we have to, before we pass in this world, do something that is honorable.

Worth merit and valid and virtue something that money cannot buy. So I went on this crusade at the time. I didn't realize they were killed for their organs, which I want to get into a little later, which is incredibly heavy, hard to believe and kind of creepy, but it's worthwhile speaking about because now the Chinese communist party is not only, uh, you know, a million miles away or at the gates of our, uh, our own freedoms in our own Western society, but inside our backyard ever since the coronavirus, et cetera, et cetera, came along.

So this is how I really got into it. 

Gotcha. Yeah. Makes perfect sense. So, so would you say it was like, where did you find yourself getting more involved? Was it maybe in the next two years after that moment? Was it closer to the last five years? Where did you see yourself really diving into this and, and really kind of getting more into the, the deeper, darker aspects of it, as opposed to kind of being intrigued by the practice itself?

Right away. I was, I I'm pretty much an extremist. And when I feel intuitively that something is right to go for, I'll go for it. So at that moment, when I came home, I, I learned the exercises. I read everything I wanted to read about the, the, the practice. I, I enjoyed the spiritual philosophy. It really matched and aligned, and the principles were quite attractive, which are very simple truthfulness, compassion intolerance.

Three universal principles that aligned with my, my Juda, Christian faith, and I found the exercises quite attractive, very healthy and comfortable. It helped me stop drinking. It helped me start smoking. It helped me align with positive principles in my business, in my love life. In my environment, people started to feel that I was much more confident and, and, and, and, uh, enthusiastic and positive.

And it was overall. It gave me a great, uh, uh, uh, healthy, demeanor. More than I had before. And then, because I really stand for humanity and I am a, basically I'm a warrior that exposes evil and defend good as I am now. Um, uh, I got involved with, uh, with the exposing child trafficking raid, and I went on a couple of myself on the board of China.

I raised a lot of money for char children in, in, in Africa for, for the slum children, uh, human trafficking victims in Vietnam, where I am now. Um, I I've, I've been doing a lot of humanitarian humanitarian work. So from the get go, I took on this mission and crusade to expose the, uh, the, the, the Chinese communist party.

That's basically the inside, every known government agency, the us military, the, the world health organization, the United nations. And I'm here today, exposing it close to Chinese border across the pond, uh, uh, with my, with my wife and. Soon to be a child. Absolutely. 

Well, it's interesting that you kind of bring up that spirituality aspect and, and what's intrigued you about martial arts and yoga and Tai Chi.

And, you know, I kind, I kind of had a similar calling myself throughout different points of my life, you know, as something growing up, I always always, you know, a little bit interested in the Eastern way of, you know, martial arts and, you know, grew up doing karate and some things like that. But I, I think I found yoga a little bit later in life.

Um, and specifically what I think to be the most spiritual aspect, you know, there's different types of yoga, right? There's like, um, you know, the, the type of yoga that people do for a workout than there's like, uh, Kini yoga, which is far more spiritual. And so did you find the LAN go kind of aspects of the expression of their spirituality to be a little bit different than anything you have seen before?

Or was it kind of similar to some of those different or, uh, you know, Eastern ideologies that you've seen before? 

Even more simple, even more clean and beautiful. I, I love the exercises and the music were just quite profound in comfort, in freedom in organicness there's no money involved. Um, there's no regimented dogma.

There's no requirements. There's no hierarchy. There's no memberships. I loved it because coming from a religious background myself, it was so easy to learn, to get along with people. Um, like I said, all walks of life, all backgrounds, all religious affiliations, uh, all political, uh, uh, um, um, base. It didn't really matter who you were from Muslims to Jews, to Christians, to atheists, to agnostic Catholics, uh, black, white, transgender, homosexual.

It doesn't, it didn't matter. I found these people, a wonderful group of people and learning the exercise. Really took me back to that yoga Tai Chi cup of vibe. And when I was in San Diego, pretty much the yoga capital of the world, and I've traveled to Bali and I've traveled to Thailand and you go to the spiritual retreats, um, people, um, I was, I was, I was teaching, uh, or sharing the exercises, the fallen gong exercises, or so known as fallen Duff.

Exercises in the yoga studios. People really resonated with these exercises because they loved yoga so much and Tai Chi and they felt an overwhelming piece and prosperity from these exercises, the energy particularly, cuz when you're dealing with yoga, as you see that you do have a spiritual aspect, but there's also a physical, energetic aspect, which combines together.

Uh, fallen go is more on the, on the, on the physical and fallen D is more on the spiritual. So when you combine the spiritual and the physical together, it forms like a beautiful Lotus flower of balance. And that's what I really appreciated about follow.  

gotcha. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. It seems to me, especially, if you even look at like the LAN gong movement, you look at the more recent movements towards even Kini yoga and, and just even the more workout ask yogas.

It, it seems to me like this is, it's kind of filling a void that we've had in our society for, you know, a few decades now and the Lanng movement. When did that start to become popularist in China, 

fallen gang, um, was introduced by Mr. Lee hung, sir, a very humble teacher. He's me nominator for five, no peace prizes.

He's been given all award types of awards. I've made him as a very humble person and he asked for no money. He seeks no reward. He, he wanted to benefit society. So he introduced the spiritual practice and the exercises. In China in 1992, and only about 200 people started to come to these classes. But then by 1998, Austin, a hundred million people, one out of every 12, Chinese national citizens, that's 8% of the 10% of the population growing annually, millions of people from all walks of life, mercury officials, government officials, the highest ranking officials of the Chinese communist party and their families over 30%, uh, more than 30% of, uh, of, of the, um, upper class society, the celebrities, just the rural people were all practicing.

You would see tens of thousands of people a day, morning, noon, and night practicing the exercises to these loud speakers of traditional music, which I wanna show you in a moment. And it just skyrocketed. It became the light force of China by 1998. However, in 1999, it was completely outlawed suppressed. And to this day, Bann.

after becoming the largest, the largest spiritual movement in Chinese history. And it was outlawed by the Chinese communist party's military dictator or evil head of the Chinese communist party in 1999. And we can get into that as well. Um, but I would love to share with you that clip from that award, what is documentary?

Absolutely. Let's do it. I have a, I have a, a, a show, uh, as well talking about all the politics that's going on in the world. And I had this award warning filmmaker who produced this video, all this, this, um, um, documentary. Her name is Kay. Ruberick a phenomenal, phenomenal, uh, uh, uh, film, uh, maker. And she actually, uh, produced the, her latest film.

Her latest were called China's walking dead, who she in, where she interviews all the very high ranking car, intelligent agents, the spies, um, and, and diplomats, former diplomat. Talking about the CCP and how evil they are, but take a look at this. I think you'll find this most, uh, interesting. Let me share this with you.

Hopefully you can see this and, and hear it. Just let me know if you can hear this. Um, yep. I will. Yep. Okay. Can you hear this? 

In the late nineties, Chinese government surveys said up to 70 million people were practicing, fallen, gone. Daily health bills were decreasing. Crime rates were falling and morality was rising.

So why were these people targeted for elimination and organ harvesting?

Mona. Ye was one of the millions meditating in parks. Every day. There was a park across the street from my house because the first exercise site couldn't hold so many people anymore. It divided into the second, the third, the fourth. So at every street corner and in every park you could see people practicing Fallon Kong.

It was from different kind in society. It was many policemen and military. It was just fundamental part of society that, I mean, everybody knew somebody who practiced Fallon go is a traditional practice of self cultivation, a practice of slow moving exercises, meditation, and studying of the principles of.

Compassion tolerance and trying to adopt those into your life. While morning exercises had always been popular in China, fallen gong brought more than just health benefits for thousands of years, the Chinese people have believed in Buddhas and Dows and becoming an immortal following. Following. Goong really dare to talk about these things.

And immediately people took it to heart. Oh, the true ancient, good things of China have come back.

However, after 50 years of political campaigns to destroy traditional beliefs, any revival of spirituality was seen as a threat to communist. Since I was 11, I experienced all of the Chinese communist parties, campaigns group. After group of good people were targeted. There was no faith, no truth.

Following gong, students, stark contrast with communist ideology. So it would be very hard for it to be tolerated by the CCP with more practitioners than members in the communist. The party, chief Jon Zin saw it as a threat to his. And overruled. The government support of fallen gone Themi issued order set up special office called six office in charge of nationwide campaign of persecution known as China's GPO.

The sixth 10 agency was above the law and could use any and all means necessary to achieve its so mission to eliminate fallen gone. The nationwide campaign began July, 1990. 

So as you can see, these people just started practicing hundreds and thousands, tens of millions of people, Austin, and the CCP just cracked down on it, outlawed it, and started to send hundreds and thousands of these people to state mandated hospitals, cutting out their organs while alive. Forcefully and in selling their organs because of the health benefits.

I mean, they were the healthiest organs in the world because of the organs, uh, being so amplified in health because of the exercises, the philosophy, a healthy mind, a healthy body, healthy spirits. And they were the CCP fueled a multibillion dollar business globally to this day. 

And so it was from my understanding too, that, that they really started to crack down on this when the percentage of people who were following gong practitioners outweighed the Chinese communist party members.

So it started to become a threat to their, you know, their, their governance and their belief systems when there was, uh, this idea of, you know, freedom of thought. And, and maybe you can speak to this, you know, they were considered prisoners of conscious, right? Is, is that the term that they. 

Absolutely.

There's four types of groups that are S of conscience at the Tibetans. I'm sure you've heard about the di Lama, the Tibetan movement for a long time. Now it's been going on, he's been going around the world, the di Lama to stand up for the Tibetans who have been also snorted for their organs and persecuted.

You've also got the house Christians and the Catholics that have also been forced underground. That's what they called. House crash, Catholics and house Christians. You've got the Uyghur Muslims in Shang. I'm sure a lot of people have heard about UMass canter, the famous NBA, uh, uh, star. Who's spoken candidly about this.

Uh, you've heard about the Hong Kong protest as well. The invasion of the CCP into Hong Kong, but not many people have heard about what we're talking about today. The largest spiritual. The 95% of the, of these, um, uh, organs are coming from these forced live organ harvesting and BR persecution is coming from fallen gong.

So yes, the four main, those are the four main prisons of conscience. Those are the four main groups, particularly the fallen gong. And, and I love what you said about the, the, the, because they became the largest spiritual group. The CC was threatened by their.  

mm-hmm . Yeah. And it's interesting that you bring up the, the Uyghur Muslims, because that seems to be something that's a consistent, not consistent enough, obviously with every atrocities that are going on, but it's more of a conversation than the Fong.

I literally, when you reached out to me, I had never heard of that term before I knew nothing about the ideology. And this is again, coming from somebody who's interested in Eastern spirituality movements and, uh, those types of, uh, ideas. And, and so it was so such a foreign term to me, I'd literally never heard of it.

So I thought it must have been some underground, not well known spirituality movement that maybe had some weird, bizarre outlook. And, and so the Uyghur Muslims was something that I had heard of, not again, not consistently enough, but far more than the, the, just the one email that I got from you regarding this, this conversation.

So it's it's why do you think that is? Why do you think the fallen gong is. Is such a, not, not even close to the conversation of the Uyghur Muslims. And obviously that's not to minimize what's happening to that, that group as well. But obviously this is a, a bigger problem as a whole, but why do you think that that's, this is not a more consistent con conversation 

because they're making billions of dollars off the fallen organs.

This is a kill to a kill, to order on demand. And I was, I was testifying with my coalition, the main investigators in the British parliament in about 2018, I believe. And we talked about this, that the absolute deluge of propaganda, Austin demonizing fallen go is some kind of OUS, CIA bath cult, which is absolutely absurd.

It's ridiculous. They weren't here to take over the government. They had nothing to do with the CIA. They they've got nothing. There's, there's nothing cultish about following gong at all. It's like saying yoga. Christianity is a cult. It's got nothing to do with it. These are people who wanted to practice their spiritual beliefs in, in, in, in, in, in freedom.

It overwhelmed the number of people in the Chinese communist party's membership by 30 million people outnumbered. Wow. That's what made it the largest spiritual movement and in a communist country. And I'm living in one. Okay. Because I'm married to a, a traditional Vietnamese woman. You are owned. If you think your freedoms are eroded now in the states, come to a communist country, spend one day in a communist country and try over to protest or try and talk to the central command, uh, uh, about your problems.

They don't care about that because you are, you've got no public, uh, rights, private rights. You've got no gun rights. You've got no, uh, uh, um, um, uh, private, private business rights. You've got no constitutional rights. So in China, when something becomes so large that the CCP cannot control. They will outlaw it.

And so the reason why people haven't learned about fallen gone in the beginning, the Western world wanted to know what was this life force? What was this popularity of millions of people a day born in noon night? You, you saw the, you saw the pictures of the, of the clip. I just played. Mm-hmm,  practicing the slow moving exercises from all walks of life, from all classes of society.

Okay. Why, what was this before the Western world truly got to understand as I'm sharing to you today on your incredible podcast in broadcast, which I'm so honored to be on, um, red bull revolution, right? Um, the CCP completely outlawed, Bannis suppressed it and sent out diplomats and delegations to demonize Fong in order to turn public opinion against the spiritual movement in and to, and to use them as raw materials.

To fund and fuel this new form of. Okay. And why I call it a new form of evil? This organ harvesting is because yes, organ harvesting and organ pilling has been widespread throughout the world. We know it from, from the us. We know it from India. We know it from other places around the world, but nothing where a government is using its military it's hospitalization systems, its entire system of control, even developing an office that sits on top of the communist body system and the government system controlling economic, social and political policies for one purpose and one purpose only to round up this vast array of organ ho organ donors, victims, excuse me, not donors because there's no consent sending them to state mandated in military hospitals and to the command of a Chinese communist party.

Just like the Nazis did with the Jews in cattle. Cause cutting out their organs while alive on a specified date on demand. Like a, like, just like a grotesque restaurant or, or, or a wet market. I don't know if any of your viewers have traveled to Southeast Asia where you see all these lobsters and all these squids and all these, uh, um, uh, shrimps swimming in a, in a bucket and you take, and you choose, oh, I want that one.

And they take out the out the, the wet, uh, outta the bucket. They're cut open for, you know, like a sushi restaurant. Well, this is happening to Fong petition. Uyghur Muslims, house Christians, but not to the scale and scope that we have ever seen. And this is what I have been investigating and tracking and have confirmed for the last 23 years of my life, particularly against following on.

Yeah. And I like the way that I like that you say con confirmed, right? Because I was, I was doing some research on this and I spoke to this a little bit. Last time we, we talked about it, but there was an article I was looking for scientific articles like EPU, you know, PubMed articles regarding this topic.

And it was, there was think there was three total. One of those three articles was basically disprove, like quote unquote, disproving. The idea that the fellen go were, were being utilized for this organ harvesting and, and it was such a grow. It was a 23 page paper, 23 pages that I read through to, to get to this information.

And, and they tried to disprove it as being like this folk lore. So what, what they said is because the, from my understanding of the fallen gong ideology, is that the idea is that there's this wheel of energy right in inside of you, I guess, is, is the general. I don't know. I I've, I read briefly on the ideology.

So there's this wheel of energy and inside of your body. And, um, that wheel of energy is, is life force. So they tried to use that analogy to make this idea of the organ harvesting, be some type of like analogy or folklore surrounding them, conspiracy the life. Yeah. Conspiracy surrounding them, taking the life force from these individuals from their wheel, uh, of energy through their, you know, um, so it was just really gross to see somebody scientifically, you know, and obviously probably paid for by the CCP to write this type of, of article of course, or in some way, shape or form push to do this because why in the world would you delegitimize such a horrific act that that's very well known to happen?

And if I'm sure the viewers don't know this, what, what year was it where they had, it was 2019, correct? Where they had the China 

Tribu. 

Yeah, the tribunal. So they brought out all of the, these different, uh, non-biased individuals across. It was some, uh, worldwide organization to try and prove whether or not this was actually even happening.

And that was only three years ago. And you said you've been doing this for 20, 22 years since this movement was outlawed in, in China or 23 years, I guess. And so to have it be going on for 20 years, without any type of response and, and people trying to even make it seem like it was a lie, like it was a joke.

Why would anybody, why would any movement, why would any ideology, why would anybody go to the lengths that you would have to go to, to speak on, on somebody doing such horrific acts to people and make that up? And so to see the, the propaganda that was being pushed out, even in American scientific journals surrounding this was so frustrating for me, especially knowing that the 2019, cause I think the article was written in 2017, the, the 2019 tribunal proving for a fact.

That this was going 

on a hundred percent. I actually have a clip to share with your viewers that this is actually going on and that this has been confirmed beyond a reasonable doubt. And that's actually been 25 years. And before the tribunal, which was about 2019, uh, I, like I said, uh, was at a child trafficking court listening to MK ultra victims.

And, uh, I raised money for an Epstein Ireland, uh, uh, survivor. Uh, that was one of, from one of the satanic families. So I got a full glimpse into what is going on, particularly with the human trafficking in the child trafficking. And I was testifying with the coalition to investigate the persecution of fallen go and the organ harvesting at the British parliament.

This was about, uh, almost, uh, uh, maybe a year later when the China tribunal came up. But if I may also just to cover it through the. Video, just a couple of minutes. It's an eight minute video, but I'm not gonna play eight minutes, but just a couple, just to show that this is actually going on, that these people who have tried to debunk this are absolutely they're the conspiracy theorists.

They are the ones that have aligned, unfortunately with the red, uh, reign of terror, the CCP bribed and paid off like many of the, the criminal journalist media in the west to push propaganda. They sold their souls. They've sold their hearts for a piece of gold. What's new, there's nothing new. The world health organization, the United nations, bill gates, Henry Kissinger, the Rothchilds, all these cab Ballas have sold theirselves Biden, hunter Biden.

I mean, we don't have to go so far. I mean, you know, that apple doesn't fall far from the tree when it comes to traders and, and, and, and, and, and evil people who are colluded with the Chinese communist party. We see it now, rampant. Justin Trudeau Jacinda from New Zealand. These people that have aligned themselves with a communist regime for money and bribes and payoffs.

So I, I'm not surprised that they will come out and demonize an innocence spiritual movement and say, oh, nothing to see here, folks, we're not doing it. Even the Chinese communist party who were bragging on their 20 websites promoting their organ harvesting that they haven't, that, that, that, that, that they've, they banned organ harvesting.

They were only doing it to certain prisoners. 

And isn't that crazy, right? That was like 2014, I believe was when there was a law passed that the, like they could no longer do it to regular prisoners or was correct me if I'm wrong. It was either regular prisoners or death row prisoners. And the only category that's prisoners.

Yeah, the, they were now, so it was 2014. They passed a law that said they were no longer able to do it to death row prisoners. And the only prisoners, they continued doing it to were prisoners of conscience. Right? So prisoners like the family wrong, like the Uyghur Muslims, like the, the Christians, like all of the, you know, these, these ideological movements, which is so foreign to us being from the United States, that you can be persecuted for a thought because that's all an ideology is right.

It's not like you went and hurt somebody. You didn't Rob somebody, you didn't go to a store. You didn't extort money from somebody. You didn't, you didn't do the insider trading that Nancy Pelosi does. And her husband on a daily basis, she didn't do any of that. You had a thought you had a beliefs, a stream of belief.

That your life brought you down a path to meet with, and you chose to go down that path because it path, because it spoke to who you were and what you felt was right in the universe, your universe, not the, not the reality of the, the Chinese communist party, not the reality of the, the democratic or the Republican party, but because you had a thought that you followed, that you felt a calling for, and because you felt that alignment with an ideology, you were then demonized to the point where you were not only, uh, deemed to have, have been put in prison for that thought.

But then the atrocities that you're speaking to today is just such a foreign idea for us here with just, and, and, and so many people wanna talk to the freedom of speech, being something that. You know, for speaking out against, you know, the, the, the wrongful press or, or the politicians lying and, and things like that.

But, you know, and, and maybe that's the separation of, uh, you know, I guess we have the separation of church and state, which it kind of adds onto another block of that, but to, to have that constitution be the, the, the dam holding back the water of all the horrific things that so many governments have done before the United States, and to have our founding fathers have the foresight to just put that one thing in there, right?

Just the one thing, the freedom of speech allows us to, to not only speak out, but to have thoughts, right? Because the, the, the thoughts are in your head and where they can start to have these persecutions is when you start to enact on them through your just verbally. Right? So it's, it's such a foreign idea to us.

And so the, I, when I heard that term prisoner of conscience was, it just blew my mind that he was, and that was again, a month ago that I heard that idea. And so to hear it becomes such a, such a, uh, a, a turning point in their culture, just for having an idea and a turning point in how many millions of people's lives that they were treated this way.

Not only put in prison, not only put into, you know, reeducation camps, which will get into a little bit later, but to be literally all right, guys. So thank you so much for listening to this episode. I need you to do one thing for me right now. I need you to go ahead and hit that subscribe button, leave a five star review, find.

Everywhere on every channel at red pill revolt on social media, you can find us on YouTube, rumble, Spotify, apple podcast, literally anywhere you get your content. We are there besides Twitter right now. Twitter kind of sucks, but you know, go check us out. Red pill, revolt or red pill revolution on YouTube, and you can follow along [email protected] go to the website right now, and you can actually sign up for life insurance directly under my license without a single phone call from an insurance agent, you can just go browse the pricing, change the, the amount benefit payouts for your life insurance.

All at red pill, revolution.co and click the menu at the top and click get life insurance. All right, you're signing up directly under my license. This is not a third party. Advertisement is the only way that you can show support. Just be besides becoming a, uh, paid subscriber from the website as well, which is just kind of, uh, you.

Supporting the podcast, but to actually get something you get that life insurance policy without any additional costs at all. All right. And you're signing up directly through me. I got a $2 million policy for myself for about $60 a month, which was truly incredible to make sure that my family is covered in the event of something horrible happening.

All right. So go ahead and hit that subscribe button, leave a five star review, and I hope you are enjoying the conversation, their organs harvested from them while they're awake, alive, and, and specifically for a thought is just sickening. 

Absolutely. Absolutely. And that's why Americans need to really pay attention to this interview.

Willy citizens specifically in the Western country, you're seeing how your freedoms are being. You're seeing Twitter and Facebook suspending and banning people for speaking up and about the, um, you know, just different things that are going on around the world, this pandemic of sorts, um, et cetera, et cetera.

And you mentioned the farming fathers will the, the, the, the most important law constitutional law that all Americans, including myself and you have, because I'm an American citizen. I was the first in my family to be an American citizen, have to protect the freedom of speech. And the freedom of thought is the second amendment.

Absolutely. And this is what they are trying to take away more, more than ever before and failing. Thank goodness because of this and step one, human. Step 

one, step one step that's step one. You have to take that away. And we saw today, today, I saw Joe Biden speak out on this, saying that I've done it before, and I'm gonna do it again.

We're gonna ban assault rifles. We're gonna ban, you know, like him going off on and hear it to hear that happening to the cheers of an audience. How, how, like spine showing is that knowing the things that are going on in different countries. And we're the only country that has that, right? The way that we do today to, to be able.

And, and so many people want to, you know, how many stupid things he even said. He said something today that was about, you know, you're not able to fight back against the government unless you have F 15. It's like tell that to the Taliban, right? The Taliban state of duo for 20 years. And, and now all of a sudden they've taken over Afghanistan.

Tell that to, to what's going on in, in Iraq today, they didn't need Ft F fifteens to do so. They didn't need any of that. They needed a, a, well, not even well formed in their case. If you watch some of the clips of the way that they, they treat combat, but a decently formed militia with gorilla warfare is a very.

Very difficult thing to fight against in an urban setting. And he's saying that tongue in cheek, cuz he knows that's not true. And, and, and for him to even point to the idea that, and he's specifically pointed out Republicans, he said that Republicans that think they're gonna fight back against their government.

Well, you need an F 15. How about the idea that we shouldn't need to fight back against our government? Right? That's what I want a president saying. I don't want a president saying, no, you need more than that. AR 15 to fight me the big, bad Joe Biden regime. No, I don't want a president. Who's sitting here, you know, pushing the, the idea that we're gonna have to fight back against our government and trying to make us seem little and on, in incapable of doing so.

I want a president who says we shouldn't even be having this conversation. I agree. You should be able to, you know, even if he doesn't want, if he doesn't agree with the, the right to bear arms or the, you know, the second a. Maybe you shouldn't be in citing the general public that in, in, in planting seeds of the idea that they're eventually gonna have to fight their government and saying it in a way that's defensive and not 

empathetic.

Absolutely. I mean, that was such a tiny Olympic, uh, uh, audience, anyway. I mean, and you were let this guy, you, you, you wouldn't let this guy, uh, bite and lead you across the toilet, let lost street. I mean, he can't even barely pull up his trousers nowadays as even know he's shaking hands with air nowadays, you know?

Right. And that's the first thing that communist regimes do. They dismantle people's ability to think critically first and foremost, they'll divide and. They'll inside hatred between one group and another, and then they'll take away the guns in the safety and security of the greater good. You've heard this before the greater good, right.

Mm-hmm  and this is what happens, but they haven't been able to do that in the United States. And that's why they haven't been going door to door. Like they have been in China. I wanna share with you, uh, Austin Crip, if I may. Absolutely. Well, I got, I've got many clips, uh, by the way. And, um, I think we have to do a part two because I, I, I might have to leave by around age 50 or 8 55, my time it's it says age 55 in the morning here in Vietnam.

But let me share with you a couple of clips, the one about the China tribunal, just coming back to confirming that this is going on against follow on practitioners, if I may. Uh, and then I wanna share with you, uh, one, uh, that is going on in China right now and how this relates because a lot of people wanna know, well, what has this got to do with me?

I'll show you what it's got to do with.  because if we are not, if we don't stand up against the CCP and it's Aran, uh, uh, attorney that we're seeing coming into our countries, then you know, we better watch out, but take a look at this. I wanted to share this with you first. If I may, um, here we go. Here's the channel tribunal that you, you were, you were talking about.

See, um, let's see if we can share this. Here we go.

It says for decades, China has been accused of killing prisoners of conscious, and it says the China or the China tribunal final judgment possible 

in today's day and time that the government would incarcerate a million people blood system, get their tissue samples, put that in a database and then sell their organs around the world.

Would it be possible that professional doctors would commit such atrocity to extract organs from a live body?  because 

it's such a huge 

and unbelievable crime. It's impossible to accept it at the first site.

And it shows that this tribunal was taking place in London on June 17th, 2019 

That was the tribunal of a 50 witnesses.

You know, people who have got high ranking standards, experts, uh, um, victims were all there exposing that. And we have something very similar at the child trafficking court at the British parliament exposing it. So it's beyond a reasonable doubt, all the skeptics. And I love the skeptics. I mean, you can't do anything about the freaking trolls and the agents, man, because they are, they they're, uh, they're so demented and, and I, I lost and I, I hope they come back.

I hope they can come back and, and, and, and get some sense about them and common logic and, and, and their WIS about them. But when you talk about skeptics, I work hard to bring the awareness to the skeptics, because I love the skeptics. I love them questioning everything until the unreasonable doubt is confirmed that this is going on and it is going on.

There's no doubt. So there's a lot more skeptics that are now coming up and coming to my son and saying, you know what, before Mitch, I thought you were a conspiracy theorist. I thought this was crazy. I did think they were a cult. I thought they were CIA backed a terrorist group. I was, I thought the government was, was, was right about them, but based on the evidence and based on seeing how, uh, fallen go has evolved into something beautiful, organic that it's always been and the evidence against this spiritual movement that has been persecuted, I am, I'm starting to see the truth.

And that is my mission complete. That, that, that is my sole mission. That's my intention to get the word out on your show on many shows to expose this evil for no fame, no fortune. I'm not tied to any CIA. I'm not tied to any Mo SUD. I'm not tied to FBI. Even though I had to sit down. When I received my death threat in Atlanta, Georgia, I sat down with two FBI agents.

They bought me lunch because I got death rided. My, uh, the Chinese, some agents, uh, broke into my car. They threatened me in 2005. When I was in South Africa, I was involved in an assassination, Tim charging, uh, uh, one of the ministries of the Chinese communist party. He was visiting South Africa and I was there at the time, visiting friends and family.

I protested outside the Chinese embassy by myself. Um, the cops tried to break, you know, break me up the, the, the cons general called the cops. And I said to them, what did Nelson Mandela and the freedom rights movement did in, in South Africa when the apart regime was suppressing you the same, what the CCP is doing to suppress fallen, go.

And they leveled with me. They understood. And they left me to my own volition and the CCP couldn't, the cons general was forced to watch the simple protest outside of their, their, their, their, their, uh, their, their bunks in their home. And, uh, they're they're housing, they're lodging and in front and across the street, the Chinese communi regimes council general.

Um, so yeah, there's no, there's no doubt that this is going on and that this is actually now reaching a boiling point and the mainstream media have to act because if they do not, there's a lot of complicity, alignment and collusion with the CCP. And if they don't want to be charged with genocide and complicity and collusion, they better come clear.

Do you think 

they are complicit at this point? Do you think that they're in some way tied and that's the reason that this hasn't come out a little bit more than it has in a mainstream conversation? 

Hundred percent. I mean, look at Biden, look at Nancy Pelosi. I'm gonna play you a clip if I'm, if I may, uh, you know, because, um, oh, 

we don't have too much of your time left, so let's, let's make sure we get some conversation then, but yeah, we'll, we'll definitely, if you think it's, it's worth it enough, for sure.

We'll, we'll, we'll play it, but so sure. Um, so what do you think that, I mean, Obviously we know the, between the, what is it, the agreement, uh, the, the telecom agreement that almost all of the major conglomerate news organizations are in some way, your shape or form tied almost to the families that you've, you've kind of alluded to several times in this conversation, do you in, in, so do you believe in some way, shape or form now, obviously this is an interesting time to have this discussion between the tensions rising between China and the United States above all else.

Right? Obviously there there's the proxy war going on in Ukraine right now between the, the, the UN and United States and Ukraine and Russia. But at the same time, we're seeing tensions rise in between China and Taiwan and really China and the us. And so you would think if they're going to in the same way that we've seen them demonize Russia, More recently with all the propaganda, with all of the, you know, the ghost of Kiev and all of these things that came up initially at the beginning of this war, after it just went, you know, completely went silent after two months of the war.

It's surprising to me that our mainstream media narratives have not started to point to some of these things like these atrocity atrocities happen as propaganda to move towards a movement in the United States here today to push towards that war. So, you know, to me, it's, it's an interesting time to have this conversation and, and also including the mainstream narratives, because you would think in the same way that they've tried to demonize Russia, that they would do the same with China.

And in, in the case of China, it seems much easier to do so with a lot of these, uh, ideological genocides that are happening there. 

Uh, I, I, I agree. Um, however,  they have not done that because of the being in bed for all these years. I mean the China gate scandal in 1996, it just goes even further, deeper than that.

I mean, since the 1960s, the infiltration of the Chinese communist body backed by the Rothchilds, the Rothchild is one of the Satan families. I'm sure that is a household name, just like the CCP nowadays, who people want Toul in the behind scenes at the kazaia mafia, you've got the free masons, you've got the Illuminati, you know, all these, these groups ring a bell to a lot of your viewers.

I'm sure who like to do a deep dive about behind the history. Um, and so the CCP has always been funded by the BA backed by the Rockefellers, the rock Charles, the Kozian mafia. They have been used the spec of communism to rule the world, the CCP. Would've never been able to muster that kind of power to infiltrate into the global, uh, arena if it wasn't for these satanic elites.

Okay. Because Satan elites love the common I specter because it is the only specter that has the, the, the, the, the, the deception to move through the Western, uh, infiltration or west Western, uh, uh, lines. It's just very similar to what happened with Spiderman three. Remember we inspired N three was the, it was the black, um, uh, I don't know what it was called, but it was the black, uh, um, uh, GU I.

Venom, something like that. Yeah,  it, it takes over, it takes over the right. It takes over and influences the mind. That's what the Spector does. It's like a black venom that takes over the mind. It, it slowly infiltrates and then controls. That's where you see the liberalism, the radical leftism, the cultural Marxism, the cancer culture, theism.

Where do you think it all comes from? The communist regime? They've used the specter to poison the minds, particularly the left's mind, the radical left the cultural Marxist through the form of socialism. Socialism socialism. It's all good for everybody. You saw some democratic congressmen and I'm not, and this is not about Democrats and Republicans.

I don't care about, I'm not political atheists. Yeah. We're far we're 

far removed from that at this point, right. Between this conversation. Like it, it seems like such a small conversation that even have at this point, when you're talking about crimes against humanity, you know, I wonder if, how many, how many democratic verse Republican conversations were going on when Jews were being gased and gas chambers during, you know, 1940s, but, uh, probably very, very little in terms of, of what was going on.

And, and that's, what's just so crazy to me is when, when you talk about Nazi-ism and, and how much of a household name that is, this. You know, not to, you know, be sensationalist, but this is one step further almost than what we saw than what was happening in the, the, the camps, right? That, um, the, the Nazi camps, right?

The concentration camps with the Nazis, because they, they would put mass murder them in gas chambers, but they weren't taking it a step further in doing this organ harvesting while they were alive. And we see so many people cry out even to this day, 60, what is it? 60, 80 years later about all the horrific things that were happening in, in 1944.

But we're literally not seeing anybody talk about this. And they literally have the same terms. Right? Reeducation camp is literally just a concentration camp with extra steps and nobody, nobody, I haven't seen. This is the first conversation that I've seen have had about this. Be, you know, besides maybe the, the small clips that you sent to me in an interview.

So you're, you're absolutely right. It is interesting to see how, you know, the, the democratic and Republican party is, is not even a part of this conversation, but it's more, it's, it's a, it's a layer or five layers, even higher than that, to where they've integrated into the societies of both in mainstream culture and the west.

And, and so I, a hundred percent agree and we had Nancy Pelosi say, did, did you see that clip where Nancy Pelosi, after she left Taiwan, she, she came out and said that, go ahead. Yeah. She said that China is one of the world's leading democracies. Did you see that clip? 

I have the clip for you. Uh, may, may I, may I play that for you?

Yes, let's do. Let, let me, let me share that with you. Uh, I know we haven't got much time, but please, because I, I, I put a compilation together for it. Um, take a listen to this. This is exactly what you're saying. They'll support the one China policy. We go there to acknowledge the status quo is what our policy is.

There is nothing disruptive about that. It was only about saying China is one of the freest societies in the world. Don't take it from me. That's from freedom house. Let's talk a little democracy, courageous people. And, and it just, I don't know why it is, uh, except there's some commercial interest who would like to diminish, uh, the relationship

you were looking at, uh, some type of, uh, like COVID, um, masked people going in and taking a woman outside of her home. 

this is what's going to happen to you, ladies and gentlemen, be prepared. If you do not stand your ground against the Chinese communist party, following gun partitioners wigga Muslims, average citizens being broken into forced entry by communist rare guards, brown shirts. You talked about Nazim, fascism, communism.

It is all under the same umbrella breaking into your house like this. Look, look, look at this. These are Chinese citizens, America. Imagine this was you, you and your family refusing to take PCR tests, refusing to take so-called, you know, these, these things okay. Mm-hmm  refusing to, to, to, to, to, uh, be obedience slaves to a CCP.

Well, this is what happens to you arm. God. In handcuffs, cuffing you and making you, enforcing you onto, uh, uh, you know, to get, uh, uh, uh, things that the CCP forces you to get tests and quarantine checks forcing you onto buses. Look at this, just thrown onto buses. This is what's happening in communist China.

Now, not tomorrow, not yesterday, not three years from now. Now. And I wanted to share that with you Austin, because I think that's very important for your audience to see this, uh, that, that, that they don't care. You're animals to them. You're raw materials. They don't care about you. Look, a woman arrested from home for refusing to do cover testing in Shanghai, Chi, China, the, the army, the military, it's all the same.

The rare guards is coming in. The gustapo removing you, like, like, like.  so I just wanted to share that with you. Yeah. 

Well, what, what timing that you had that, that clip up in the hopper? Cuz that's exactly the quote that I was talking about. They are some of the freest people in the world. Are you kidding me?

Who it was unbelievable to hear that clip, especially knowing the context of the conversation that we were gonna have and, and see that she came out after the Taiwan scandal of, you know, there was 200,000 or 300,000 people at one point watching her flight, there was a flight radar, uh, 365 that I watched it on and everybody was just praying.

China did one thing, right.  to take, take Nancy Pelosi to their side. But, um, yeah, it's crazy to see that, that she comes out and says that following on the backs of the Taiwan situation and, and just how frustrating that is to hear and to know exactly the direction. Exactly the direction, our government, at least one half of the government's going.

And that's another conversation that we can have is like, you know, the divide and whether one side or the other is, is the enemy or, or is aligned with the Chinese communist party or, or the, you know, even more so than the Chinese communist party, because you can go one layer above that, which is the families that you were talking about in alluding to earlier because the, the Chinese communist party and the liberal idea, ideolog ideology and communist party is all just a subsection of what's above that.

And who's driving those decisions. But to, to see that one of our, the speaker of the house of the United States of America just came out and said that Chinese people are some of the freest people in the world, who are you comparing that against? Because from what I've seen and, you know, and there's even recently videos of, of the, the police there that have these, uh, sunglasses that they can wear these, these, have you seen this.

There's these sunglasses that they can wear that utilizes facial recognition technology that will facially identify individuals who, and, and it will read their temperature. In real time. It will look up their, their, uh, ID to see if they have any like tickets outstanding, or to see if they have any, uh, like warrants outstanding.

And it will allow these policemen, their social credit score, all of those things directly through this, like AR augmented reality glasses that they're wearing on their faces today. Just like you said, this isn't yesterday, this isn't tomorrow. This is today right now. There's there's in that country.

Policemen wearing glasses that is scanning the temperature of everybody, right? And this isn't even ideology. This isn't even ideological. It's not even physical. It's not, you don't have to do anything wrong. You can be around the wrong, but you like literally last week, my kids were sick. And, and I was sick and I would've walked out downtown to in the city that I live in.

And some policemen would've picked up on that. And I would've got thrown into a truck and sent to a, a camp for however many months in my family. Wondering if I'd ever come back. And now Nancy, Pelosi's sitting on TV talking to the United States, media companies saying that Chinese people are one of the freest people in the world.

And this is me sitting here, been researching this for a month. I can't imagine how infuriating that is to you to hear. 

It's disgraceful. It's a sellout. I mean, before Nancy Pelosi was a huge advocate of, of bringing human rights to China, but it just goes to show the house of re uh, representative has passed resolutions after resolutions, paper documents, urging the CCP to stock the organ harvesting.

I mean, it's, it's, it's such a bunch of garbage. Uh, and then she comes out and talks about that. And you know, why, you know, why these politicians T tail and run and turn coats because of the money? Because the business deals look at her, her, uh, her, um, um, her son, she, he was on the same plane with her. These are business deals.

Look at the big guy. Look at hunter Biden. Yeah. Or business deals, all getting rich off the blood sweet and tears and the slave labor of communist China, China gate. I was just talking to buy 9 96. Yeah. Hey, can 

you go into that a little bit? I, I haven't heard about China gate very much. I, I'm not familiar with it at all.

Can you give a, a real quick brief on 

that? Sure it was the worst scandal in us history in terms of selling the missile defense systems technology and the manufacturing base and the book Clinton Ary, Hillary Clinton and Al gore to the Chinese communist party in exchange for millions of dollars in campaign contributions.

Look what happened in 2020 with the dominion systems, Michael and Delmar with absolute proof look at connect, which is a voting election software that has been running the election systems in the United States that has, has been created by the communist party and the Confucius Institute, which is the propaganda arm of the communist party.

The, the elections were rigged and stolen by Trump to install the CCP puppet Biden at thehe of the CCP. 80, 60 to 80% of the, the infiltration was coming and switching of the vote was coming from communist China. So all this Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia. You're looking at the wrong enemy guys. It's the Chinese communist party.

They've infiltrated into the us military, the spies, the network of spies, the database of agents. There was leaked 1.9, 4 million spies. I mean in a D O D in a department of justice in the us mercury the traders in the UK, us and British parliaments in the multinational corporations, in the criminal journalist media that have been sold out and bribed and, and paid off by the CCP to push the propaganda.

No wonder the world hasn't learned about Fong Kong now wonder the world has got a bad impression of the spiritual movement who were the first ones, Austin to warn the world. B, uh, of the CCP through their media, the epoch times, NTD TV, sound of hope. The epoch times outta New York has skyrocketed in popularity.

Why? Because people want to ti are tired of the, of the, of the lying mainstream media and they want the truth. That's why they come to you. That's why they learn about they listen to me now. I mean, it's been, it's taken me 25. God, you excuse my language to get the word out. I've I've been banging on the freaking doors of these multinational corporation media agencies for the longest time.

I've just got Bann off Facebook. I Bann off Twitter. I'm shadow a band off YouTube. I can't even, I can't, you can't speak anything. So where do we go? We go and we go on red, red pull revolution, podcasts like yourself that are actually gonna be skyrocketing, our population and popularity because people are tired of the lies and they want the.

absolutely. Yeah. And I think that is that you've seen a huge movement away and it is so nice to see. And, and, and, you know, you can say whatever you want about Donald Trump, rather whether you're on one side of the spectrum or, or the other, or somewhere in between. Correct. But the, one of the most amazing things that he did, it was open the general public's eye eye to the fake news.

Like the, the, the, just the tagline fake news. It was everybody  exactly the, the fake news tagline changed the world's perception on mainstream media and made people realize that they were being pedaled propaganda from the largest corporations. I mean, one of the most impactful videos that you'll ever see that will wake you up to what is going on in our mainstream media today.

Is that, do you ever, have you seen the clip? I'm sure you have. I mean, you might even have it in, in the waiting list on your videos over there with how timely that Nancy Pelosi clip was , but where all of them. Where there was 150 different news people saying the same exact thing at the same exact time in this like, uh, you know, ordered oh yeah.

Uh, list of, of different companies and, and individuals say word for word, the same exact thing. And how many people woke up to that because of Donald Trump. Right? Because he came out and talked about the phase, the fake news, CNN is plummeting, right? They're they're they just fired basically everybody that they have on staff, hoping they bring some legitimacy back to their brand.

The CNN plus even Fox news is getting it right. Fox news. A lot of people have moved away from believing in Fox news. And that's because of the legacy that has been left by Donald Trump, by going after the mainstream media and news corporations for being a, a puppet for the, the powers that be that the large.

Multi-trillion dollar families that you've spoken to and, and it all comes off of the, you know, that's one thing that Donald Trump is realized very, very, you know, is a very powerful thing. If you can find some type of tagline taglines start movements, right? Whether it's fake news, whether it's, uh, you know, um, the, the Biden, uh, Biden, crime, family, whatever it is, there's the, these short one off punchy little taglines that he came up with had so much impact in the movements that were created.

But I literally, I believe that the best thing that Donald Trump did was wake up, not even just the Republican side, not even the cent side, but obviously with CNN, even we see that he woke up the liberal side of things to what is going on in our mainstream media today, because nobody not anybody under 70 years old, Does not believe what they've seen at face value now.

And so you're exactly right. That's why they're going to podcasts. That's why they're going to social media. And the podcast is such an awesome medium to be able to do these types of conversations with, because it doesn't have that, that, you know, lynchpin that algorithm, that shadow banning aspect to it, whatever audience you have, they're gonna hear you.

And they're gonna hear a long form conversation like this. And if you have a, a 32nd clip and a lot of my stuff, I is promoted through one minute reels and tos and that type of thing, you can't do it justice in the same way that me and you sitting down having a an hour conversation at this point has, it's just so impactful.

And it allows people to unpack things in the way that you never would have had, right. Even Tucker Carlson. What a 25 minute, probably piece on throughout the night, you know, you, you just cannot go into that much detail, the same way that you can in the podcast format. And, uh, lucky for us, it, it, it popped off right at the right time, right?

As mainstream media was, was being, you know, just completely just being obliterated by the general public, waking up to the idea that these things that they're saying are, should not be taken at face value at the very least should not be taken at face value and warrant extra steps. If not just bluntly, not believing a word that comes out of their mouth.

100%. I couldn't have said it better. And that's why thank God for your, uh, podcast re revolution Austin, because you're doing a godsend. I mean, for people to come on your show like myself, especially myself who is exposing this genocide of the modern era. I mean, when this comes out to realize what the CCP has done to the fallen gone practitioners also known as fallen, Duffer practitioners, people are gonna be Godsmack.

They it's been so hidden. So demonized. So, uh, um, uh, you know, just CED the stifled. 

Yeah. In every aspect, right. And even somebody like me, who's in the game, right. I'm constantly looking for articles, constantly reading on these things that I find to be interesting. And in the same world of like questioning the, the mainstream narratives and, you know, it's what this show is entirely about.

And I physically had no idea what the Falo gong were. Let alone the atrocities that were happening to them until you brought it up. And, and, you know, so just to, just to be able to have whatever platform I can to share that I'm, I'm, I'm really, really glad that we're able to get this message out because there's not very many atrocities going on across the world that, that match this, this 

horrific thing that is happening.

No, there isn't no, there isn't and I've been dedicated to this for 25 years. And before I leave Austin, because it's been an honor and a privilege and a pleasure, may I share some websites that people can actually go learn about fallen gong if they want to practice it? Um, you know, I, I would love to just share them just briefly with you.

Absolutely. This is where people can learn about fallen. Gone. Can, can you see this? I think you can. Yep. This is learn, learn fong.com. Uh, learn F a L U N G O N g.com. Um, and this is the exercises again for the body, for the mind, for the spirit, whether you're religious, you're atheist is agnostic. It doesn't really matter.

Uh, the body it increases for Fong. What it doesn't increases energy and vitality boost immune system improves physical wellness for the mind, for the spirit acquiring inner pieces truck. It's quite profound and you can try it, uh, uh, free of charge, um, wherever you are in the world. This is the, uh, the exercises.

It's all based on truthfulness, compassion, and tolerance. These are the five exercises Austin, actually the first one that stretches the second one, uh, third, fourth, and fifth. And it's, it's quite profound for health and longevity. Um, now for people who want to learn about the history and why it's has been outlawed and persecuted this, uh, particular, uh, site called Fallon info.net, uh, hopefully you can see this.

It talks about what Fallon gun is, the hundred million people who are targeted and the forced organ harvesting. And you can also, uh, watch really good documentaries for free as well, uh, award winning documentaries. And you can also voice your support, uh, to tens of men's remain at risk. And you can give your voice to those who ha who have none, uh, at follow info.net, F a L U N I nfo.net now for the skeptics out there.

And this is where I bring the next website. Um, it's all the reports at this particular website. This is end transplant, abuse.org end transplant abuse.org. Here are all the investigator reports from the, um, uh, the, uh, uh, investigators, the experts. You got the, the, the, uh, 2016 investigative investigation and update the tribunal, all the academic, academic articles, government reports, NGOs books, documentaries, the media analysis, the response taking action.

If you like, and if you go to the video section, you'll see the round, uh, Roundtable coalition.  which is an incredible panel of experts. Uh, hopefully you can see this here you can. This is the round table coalition. Uh, David Kor, uh, um, Chris Chappel who runs China and uncensored on YouTube. Ms. Antalgia Lin, who is Ms.

World David matters, Ethan Goodman and Matthew Robinson. And you can watch the complete series for free about all the investigations and reports, the victims and the numbers, the suppression by the CCP and the legislation advocacy all here, black and. Uh, you know, it's beyond a reasonable doubt, but again, if anyone really loves yoga, Tachi fallen go is beautiful.

It's a spiritual movement and it's practice for your charge, but fail to support what is good and fail to expose evil's unacceptable. So again, I'm so grateful Austin to come on your incredible podcast to share about what fallen go is for fallen Duffer and the evil and atrocities behind it. And. Because if we don't stand up against a group that is outside of our realm of, uh, of family or friends of business of colleagues, then what happens when it happens to us, you usually stand up against, uh, this evil, when it starts to happen to us.

When our families are dragged up, when your children are sent to quarantine camps, what ha what's it. So take this as a warning, ladies and gentlemen, take this as a true warning that if we don't stand up against a atrocity and it's evil, that is now infiltrated into our economy, infiltrated into our, uh, businesses and our, uh, government agencies in our weaponization of the agencies you see in the FBI.

I, you know, look at the FBI being weaponized. Where do you think that comes from all coming from the CCPs playbook and policies. So let's just be aware about that and this absolutely 

well, Mitchell Gerber, everybody. Where is, is there anywhere that they can find you follow you and, and kind of follow your journey?

Yes, you can. You can find me in my, the last, uh, remaining, uh, channel, uh, YouTube, uh, uh, Twitter. Twitter is, uh, truth seeker 0 7 7 truth seeker 0 77. I'm I'm heavily shadow banned, but those, if anyone wants to reach out and, uh, uh, uh, contact me, you can contact me there. Perfect. 

Well, I love it, Mitchell. I thank you so much for what you do.

Honestly. It. Coming from my side of things, it's it, it's difficult enough and frustrating enough doing the things that I'm doing here in the us, which is not nearly what you're doing over there. Um, so honestly from the bottom of my heart and, and the bottom of the heart of humanity, what you're doing is amazing and, and keep spreading the word, keep sending, you know, keep getting on shows, keep, keep pushing because you, you truly, you know, if nothing else, if nobody takes anything away from this, you changed my view on this and, and opened my eyes to something that I, like I said, never had any clue on until you emailed me.

Um, so I truly, truly am appreciative of what you're doing. I'm truly appreciative for you reaching out and, uh, keep it up because you're, you're going to make a difference and I, and you already have, so keep, keep 

doing it well, I'm honored to be on your incredible podcast and keep doing what you're doing, Austin.

You're awesome. You're a warrior and, and the soldier of the truth, and we are on. The verge. I mean, we are in the battle between good and evil and we're on the verge of change. And we really have to stand a test of time. This is the hill we have to stand and maybe possibly die on, but to fail, to support what is good and to fail, to expose what is evil is unacceptable.

And red pull revolution is doing just that. Exposing evil, bringing to light the truth. And, uh, the, the, the enemy are calling rat on a sinking ship. It's a matter of time that they, they lose the war because this is the last battle. And we will triumph for over evil. 

Amen brother, well, keep doing what you're doing.

Then you completely embody that, uh, statement of, you know, pushing back against something that you believe is wrong and obviously live your life in a way where, where you hold that to be true. And, and not only hold it to be true ideologically, but, but physically too, by, by continuing to push the word out.

So, uh, thank, thank you so much for being on the show. 

Thank you, brother. God bless you. Thank you everybody. What.

In this week's episode, we discuss Congress's most recent remarks regarding UFOs, We also discuss what the not-so-difference is between Chemtrails and Cloud seeding.  We take a look at the recent remarks by Joe Biden on Student Loan Forgiveness and whether or not that is even in his power to do. Last, we discuss marc Zucker berg going on to Joe Rogan to discuss Censorship, the FBI, and Hunter Biden's laptop scandal.

Subscribe and leave a 5-star review!

----more----

In this week's episode, we discuss the controversial figure Andrew Tate getting banned by Meta from Facebook and Instagram. We also discuss a new biotech company that wants to clone human embryos for organs... creepy. We also discuss the recent accusation by Russia of alleged war crimes by Ukraine. 

Subscribe and leave a 5-star review!

----more----

Welcome to the revolution.

Hello, and welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams, and as always, thank you so much for listening today. I appreciate it. From the bottom of my heart, we have some wild things to discuss some happenings in the metaverse some things that have gone on with recent bands. So let's jump into it today.

We are going to talk about mark Zuckerberg, unveiling his new. Allegedly boyish metaverse avatar after getting mocked for his creepy dead eye original version. So we will discuss that. We've also discussed a little bit about what the hell the metaverse is, and even if you wanna ever take part in it for any reason, we're also going to talk about a biotech company that wants to take human DNA and basically just create artificial embryos that could be used to harvest organs for medical transplants, which sounds a.

It sounds pretty creepy, but when you actually think about what that means, it's extremely creepy and, uh, definitely some sort of human rights violation. And if it's not, it should be, but we will discuss that. We'll also discuss some recent allegations by Russia saying that Ukraine has been using chemical terrorism on its soldiers, as well as a recent, I guess, assassination that happened on the daughter of a Russian intelligence officer, uh, which seems a little bit.

A little bit like a war crime to me. So we'll discuss that. We'll also talk about maybe we'll we might have this little bonus article here. We'll see if we get to it, but we got some, some decent things to discuss here. So if we do get to it, we'll talk about a dad who took photos of his toddler. You know, basically like every person who takes photos of their toddler ever.

Um, but actually for this one was to send it to a doctor. And Google flagged him as a criminal, like basically for pedophilia distribution in some way, when his doctor asked him for the photo. So we may get to that and discuss it. We are also the main topic for today. Some videos that I have up today are to discuss Andrew Tate.

And if you don't know who Andrew Tate is, he's quite the character. And, uh, he's. Influencer, whatever the hell that means today, but he's kind of a Dick  and kind of might be, uh, a little bit of an understatement, but he was recently banned by Instagram and Facebook. So we will discuss why. And if I agree with the decision.

So, I guess you'll have to stick around for that. Now. That is what we're gonna discuss today. It's going to be a great conversation, so stick around. But the first thing I need you to do is go ahead and hit that subscribe button, leave a five star review. It would mean the world to me, if you did. So it's the only way that we can get put up in the ranking.

So I appreciate you and love you for listening. Go ahead and hit that subscribe button. If it's your first time here, I appreciate it more than, you know, and if you don't know. And you probably do. It's a good way to get some good karma, leave a five star review. Tell me what you liked about the podcast.

Tell me what you hate about Andrew Tate or love about him. I don't know whatever your opinion is.  I don't know, say something on there and leave a five star review. It would mean a lot. Then next thing I needed to do is head over to red pill, revolution dot. See, you can sign up for the subst stack. You'll get all of the articles, all of the videos from today's episode directly in your email, along with the audio podcast, the video podcast, some awesome stuff that I'm building over there directly on the website, where you can get basically all of the content.

So head over there right now, and that's all I got for you. So without further ado, let's jump into it. Episode 40 of the red pill revolution podcast.

Welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams, red pill revolution started out with me realizing everything that I knew, everything that I believed, everything I interpreted about my life is through the lens of the information I was spoon fed as a. Religion politics, history, conspiracies, Hollywood, medicine, money, food, all of it, everything we know was tactfully written to influence your decisions and your view on reality by those in power.

Now I'm on a mission, a mission to retrain and reeducate myself to find the true reality of what is. That curtain and I'm taking your ass with me. Welcome to the revolution.

All right. Welcome to episode 40 of the red pill revolution podcast. And the very first topic that we are going to discuss today is going to be mark Zuckerberg, coming out with a new avatar for his metaverse, uh, deal he's got going on there. So it says mark Zuckerberg, um, reveals new boyish metaverse avatar after getting mocked for a creepy dead.

Original version.  so well, let's look at this article if you'll be able to see this, uh, if you're watching the video, if not, just look up mark Zuckerberg, metaverse avatar, and you'll see why everybody's going crazy about this because it is quite creepy. Right? I think the idea for people in the metaverse is already kind of a, a weird, uh, idea for them to jump into a.

Virtual reality type of world and interact with other people. And it seems to be even creepier when you're doing it with basically me or we characters , everybody's walking around looking like the original we characters you think by now, 20, 22, 10 years after the, we came out that they probably would've improved avatars in some way, shape or form.

But I don't know. It seems like Facebook just kind of ripped them off of Nintendo, but from the looks of this picture, The original one's a little bit more, uh, a little bit more 2d. The, the next one's a little bit more 3d, which I don't know how you, you know, they didn't change the whole graphics of the metaverse to do this, but it goes on to say that, uh, mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meda UN revealed of new boyish metaverse avatar on Friday after a creepy DEI version, he posted Monday was roundly.

Roundly not round deadly Zuckerberg also on Friday, promised a major graphics update for horizon worlds, meta versus platform, which has been criticized for its budget. Feel on which I guess is what I was just talking about with the, we hold deal on Monday, Zuckerberg shared on his Facebook profile that horizon worlds had launched in France and Spain and posted an image of the Zuckerberg avatar standing in front of the Eiffel.

Social media users were quick to de ride the image with some likening it to the graphics of 1990s video games like Zelda and quake in 2007 second life. Now that's an interesting conversation because if you don't know what second life is, second life was a. Some type of like role playing game, you could have played, I don't know, 15 to 20 years ago.

Like really like when the internet first started, second life was a, a very commonly used, you know, like third world. I remember my, my father actually talking to me about it and saying how people would like buy houses and buy land in second life. And they would go to a job and they would like do all this crazy stuff.

And it sounded almost exactly like. Mark. Zuckerberg's trying to recreate here just with, and with the same exact graphics you think they would do a little bit better job at it, but if you don't know what second life is, go look it up. I guess it has a very, uh, dedicated community of furries over the years.

who would meet up there. But, um, it, it is quite wild to me that there's been literally there. There's no difference between the metaverse and what second life was. And so it's like a weird, you know, the idea of like getting, putting a headset on and using, you know, web three type, uh, you know, uh, cryptocurrencies to buy stuff and, uh, NFTs in your home that you can show, like, I guess there's that element to it, but it's nothing new.

This has been out for a while. Second life has been around for a very long time, you know? And, and the only difference that they seem to have at all is just. It seems to be more expensive and requires a barrier to entry with a virtual reality headset. So I would say looking at this picture of mark Zuckerberg, the only thing more creepy than mark Zuckerberg's original or second avatar, right?

This weird boyish avatar. The only thing creepier than mark Zuckerberg's avatar is. Mark Zuckerberg  if you go back and watch him in front of like the Senate or Congress and you see him sipping, you know, his, his water sipping stuff that he was so famous for, you know, is, is so interesting to see this robot sit in front and answer questions.

Exactly. Like a robot would. And so mark Zuckerberg's creepy little avatar here is pushing me no closer to jumping on the metaverse. Now what I would say is that AR VR is absolutely going to come into your life. It's absolutely going to become in, uh, a big facet of business. They're going to find a use for it.

You see all of these huge companies like Google, like apple, like Facebook, meta, whatever the hell you want to call it, they're all getting in on this for a reason. And this, the reason is not for today. The reason is for, I don't know, five or 10 years from now. If you remember in. Think back to like Google glass, right?

The glasses that you would wear, Google glass was mocked ridiculously for a while, but it looked a lot better than these virtual reality sets. So, so think of like, if you're putting on Google glass and you're walking through your normal day to day, the idea's gonna be that your phone's gonna go away.

It's gonna integrate into your glasses. Eventually turn into contacts and eventually be an implant in the back of your head. But the idea is gonna be that it's not gonna be these huge Oculus glasses that you're wearing on your head. The idea is it's gonna be first, something like the Google.  hopefully just not as weird, you know, sci-fi looking, but the Google glass was mocked for, by a ton of people.

There was a super long beta program, which like took all the hype away from it. But imagine the Oculus turning into Google glass and then imagine going about your day and doing everything that you would normally do on your phone, where you have to look down your neck, stretches out six different ways and you wake up with a only being able to.

To the right instead of the left,  all of that will go away is my guess. All of that's gonna what's gonna happen is it's gonna turn into glasses that you're gonna be able to, that augmented reality is gonna be going about your every day shooting video from it, taking pictures with it. Eventually it'll become integrated into your body somehow.

So you don't even have to wear glasses, but I probably would rather. Have glasses, honestly, myself and then the gaming aspects of it. Cool. But there, there's a lot of really interesting business cases that are coming about, and I'm finding this out in my business life, but I really do think that it's gonna become a part of something.

Now, I don't think that the virtual reality, we universe that they're creating here is going to be the answer. I think it's more so a test pilot for them to, you know, utilize these things and try new things to see how people like it. I don't know, weird, weird stuff, but that's where we're going a hundred percent.

That is where we're going. Augmented reality. VR is gonna be very much so integrated in the people's everyday lives. Probably more than a lot of people would like, but eventually you'll do it because the inconvenience of not doing it will be outweighed by the convenience of doing it. And. What will be a positive thing that comes out of that is we'll be able to get rid of our phones.

Right? You'll actually seem like you're interacting with people. You'll look up a little bit more. There probably won't be as many people with scoliosis in the world. So the chiropractors of the world might go away.  a lot of positive things that could come out of this, but one of the negative things is we have to see mark Zuckerberg's creepy little, we face.

And, and, uh, even though he updated, it looks just as bad. So anyways, just wanted to throw that out there. I thought that was hilarious that  his, we character, his metaverse avatar is basically just as, almost as creepy as he is in real life. All right. So the next thing that we're gonna discuss here is going to be a little bit more, you know, I guess to me, a little bit more creepy, what they're gonna be doing is says, and this is comes from the business insider.com and it comes from an Israeli company that is going to, it's a biotech company that wants to take human DNA and create artificial embryos to basically take for human organ harvest.

You heard that right in true Jurassic park fashion, they want to make cloned humans to do organ harvesting off of what a super. Freaky weird future dystopia. Do we live in where this becomes an acceptable headline, even without a bunch of people going off on how wrong this is, right. I'm pretty sure this would be not allowed legally in a lot of different countries.

Um, but let's go ahead and read this, read this article, and then we'll talk about it. This says a biotech company based in Israel wants to replicate a recent experiment that successfully created an artificial mouse embryo from stem cells. Only this time with human. So scientists at wet them's molecular genetics department grew synthetic mouse embryos in the jar without the use of sperm, eggs, or a womb.

According to a newspaper published in the journal cell on August 1st, it was the first time the process had been successfully completed insiders Maryanne GU not reported. The, the replica embryos could not develop into fully formed mice and were therefore not. Not real. What does that even mean? Jacob.

Hannah, who led the experiment? What does real mean? Real means tangible, right? Maybe they're not complet. Sentient like you and I, or a regular mouse or a regular person. But that doesn't mean they're not real. They don't, they're not mark. Zuckerberg's meta avatar.  like, no, they're real. However, scientists, it says observed the synthetic embryos, having a beating heart blood circulation, the start of a brain, a neural tube, and an intestinal trick.

Hannah told MIT technology review after the success of the mouse review or the mouse experiment, he is working to replicate the results with human cells, including his own.

The embryo is the best organ making machine and the best 3d bio printer. We tried to emulate what it does. Hannah said in this statement, other experts say that will take significantly more research before synthetic human embryos are within reach renewal BioD is real based company founded by. Hannah wants to use this science for organ tissue transplants that could solve infertility genetic diseases and issues related to old age.

For example, the MIT technology review reported that blood cells from the embryo could potentially be used to help boost immunocompromised systems. Renewal bio believes that some of the world's most pressing problems are declining birth rates and fast aging populations to solve these complex and compounding issues.

Neuro bio aims to make humanity younger and healthier by leveraging the power of the new stem cell technology. Wow. Okay. In short, what they're doing is they're creating half. So it says, handle told the MIT technology review that he could potentially get around these ethical concerns. So actually let's read the next couple paragraphs, cuz it talks about that.

It says to solve these complex issues, we just talked about it O a mirror. My of DRI the acting CEO of renew bio told MIT technology review that the company did not want to overpromise or scare people with the potential technology, but that Hannah's experiment was amazing. The use of human embryo clones for research has been frequently raised ethical research or concerns within the scientific community, including the potential that synthetic embryos may experience pain or sentient, according to a 2017 paper published in the journal of E.

Hand has told MIT technology review that he could potentially get around these ethical concerns by creating synthetic human embryos with no heart, no lungs or no brain. Wow. You, that is a literal, super villain. They're cloning people to harvest their organs in, in a test tube. Like what, how in the world is this?

A UN violation. I'm sure it is right. I'm sure you're gonna have to go to a, uh, Biolab in Ukraine that doesn't exist to have this type of thing done, you know, like the other 17 that still according to the United States doesn't exist.  so, um, so yeah, they, they're definitely gonna have to skirt some, some legality rules.

Now this is something that China's been doing for a while is, is some type of like, if you've ever heard of the word Kymera, Kymera is, are a real thing. So if you think back to like, there's like a lot of like, Like not, not biblical, but like hieroglyphics ideas. Think of like the man. Uh, the centar right. A centar is a Chimera in the way, because it's a human mixed with a horse in a, a Chimera is something that they've been doing in China for decades.

They've been literally taking animals, cloning them and mixing their DNAs so that they're not considered something that falls under the laws that we have created because we never created laws with the intention for China to recreate. Animal DNA creatures. And so they've been using these creatures and mixing them with things like pigs in humans, so that they can do these types of, or organ harvesting, which I'm finding out recently.

And you'll find this out in the next episode, where I do an interview with a guy who, who discusses this type of thing, where they do these live organ harvestings in China, on certain communities, which is gonna be an awesome. Um, not awesome is probably not the right term, but a very intriguing and deep and highly concerning episode is probably much more accurate than interesting or any other words that I used for that.

But this, this seems to be a direction that humanities going, that a lot of people ethically are not even aware of. They're not aware of this. This article was like pretty buried on Reddit that I found that, um, and it was just released nine hours ago. So maybe that's why, but it's, it's not a very talked about issue that there's literally animal human bags of meat out there that they're taking organs from in China, trying to recreate.

If you don't believe me, there's scientific articles where they're talking about this thing, and this is not, this is not new. This is not conspiracy theories, nothing. This is legitimate science. I don't know if you consider that legitimate, but, you know, God making of, of scientists by creating their own animals.

I mean, there was a quote that was pulled from Jurassic park about, you know, doing something before it's read. Like I saw it from this post about this. Let's see if I can find it. Cuz I think it was a pretty well relatable quote to what's actually happening here. It talks, you know, if you know the idea. Um, you know, Jurassic park, which I'm sure most of you  understand.

Um, it, it's the idea that we're doing something that we don't know what we're doing. Right? We have no idea what the implications of these actions are going to be. We have no idea what's actually gonna come of this. We have no idea what type of sentience these things have. We have no idea what we are doing yet.

We are doing it anyways. And nobody's talking about like, this literally has 200, 322 comments on it and it's buried.  and we're cloning humans, right? Like it's, this is, this is not, this, this should not be a small deal. Um, so let's read what it says here. It says that the, uh, let's see if I can find this Jurassic park.

Now, the interesting thing that Reddis been doing is they've changed it from top comments to best comments, which who decides what's best they do. So they can go in there and curate it, however you like. And you have to go in there and specifically choose to go to top comments instead of best comments.

But let's see if I can even find this. And if not, I'll, I'll kind of give you a synopsis of what was said here, but it looks like they've buried a lot of this. Of the actual comments here. So maybe I won't be able to find it, but I'm sure it's readily available for you to look up a quote from Jurassic park where they're talking about this.

But the whole idea is that we're doing something that we don't understand where we're putting ourselves as a position of humanity. We are, our scientists are acting as if they are gods, right? They are messing with human DNA and mandating you to do it. Or else you don't get your job. They are creating human clones that they're taking lungs hearts and.

Brains away from so that they've not legally considered humans. We, this is the most sickening, disgusting thing that's going on in the, like, probably not the most, but pretty damn up there. And nobody's talking about it, right? We, we are. So, and that's the problem with the internet is that we are so overloaded with so much information.

You can go on Reddit and. 500 posts that are more lighting up to the brain of the average individual and then buried in there somewhere as this article. And it never sees the light a day. And even to the point, I should have a whole damn episode on this and we're gonna be talking about some random social media influencer getting banned, right?

And now he's not random. He's like one of the most, you know, controversial top people of right now. But nowhere near the amount of attention and energy should be drawn to that is just drawn to this right. We're gonna be talking about that for probably even further, because I didn't do enough research on that.

This is wild. This is crazy. I just saw, like I said, this article came out nine, nine hours ago, but it's absolutely something that we should be talking about and something that we should be highly highly concerned with. Uh, but anyways, um, let's just read this small portion and we'll, it says, I mean, I guess we've read a little bit more of it than we, we needed to, this is crazy.

This is wild. There should be outcry everywhere in the world about this and nobody is talking about it. So maybe we should, you.  bring it up. Maybe I'll I'll, I'll do a whole episode deep dive into it. And, and, and I think it'd be fair because the Chimera conversation is absolutely one that you should know about too, in, in the, you know, atrocities that are happening in these deep, dark biomedical labs with these villain, like super villain scientists out there creating monsters that we don't even know what we're.

And at the same time, they're creating AI. And at the same, like literally every Jurassic park would be the least of my concerns compared to the AI super robots that we're creating that are gonna be doing your chores. According to Elon Musk and the Kymera slash cloning of humans for organ harvesting. If they created dinosaurs and put 'em in a zoo, that's pretty damn cool.

This. This is not the thing.  like, let's, let's go back to Jurassic part times because I'd much rather have that than I think have this, uh, anyways. So the next topic that we're gonna discuss here is going to be the Russia Ukraine situation. We haven't had a, a really big, um, we haven't had a really big update on this recently, and it seems like you almost have to find this information yourself, right?

If you're, you know, how many people on, on your road have a damn Ukraine flag on their porch. It's so crazy. But you really aren't hearing much about it. And, and this might be why there's some weird, uh, black hat, war tactics going on here between Russia and Ukraine and a good amount of it from the headlines and the headlines.

Only the headlines that we're seeing that are curated for us on the American, uh, you know, internets just like China had their own 10 years ago. We now have our own, you know, access to information cuz you can't even find the, um, what is it RT? Russia, uh, news outlets talking about these things. You have to go to Reddit and only get spooned.

What they're telling you that they want you to, to, to hear through the censorship of our social media channels. So now this comes from, um, in a butcher this, but it's like a foreign news company. I'll just zero a L J a Z E E R a. And it says that Russia accuses Ukraine of chemical terrorism using tox. So that Russia is accusing Ukraine of poisoning their soldiers, which would be against the Geneva convention.

It says Kiev dismisses the allegations of poisoning, Russian soldiers with BTO lium, toxin, and says that invading troops likely eight expired canned foods. Yeah. Okay.  we think you're poisoning our soldiers. Nah, they probably got some bad chili from Kroger.  uh, it says that Russian's defense minister accused Ukraine of poisoning.

Some of its soldiers in the Russia controlled part of Ukraine, Southern Eastern region of Zappia in late July. An advice to Ukraine's interior ministry said that on Saturday in response to the alleged poisoning could have been caused by Russian forces. Eating expired. Canned. A number of Russian soldiers were taken to a military hospital with signs of severe poisoning on July 31st test showed a toxic SU substance Butlin bow bot toum B O T U L I N U M bot toum toxin type B in their bodies.

The Russian defense ministry said on, on the fact of chemical terrorism sanctioned by the Zelensky regime, Russia's preparing, supporting evidence with the results of all the a. Said the ministry in a statement, it did not say how many soldiers suffered poisoning or what their condition was now, or elaborate on what the supporting evidence was involved.

Butum toxin type B is a neurotoxin that cause that can cause bot bot, gosh, this word, stupid botulism.  when ingested and is previously contaminated food product, but it can also have medical uses. Russia's defense ministry said that his findings will be given to the organization for prohibited of chemical.

Or op C w evidence of chemical terrorism by the Keine was soon be formally forwarded to the op C w through the permanent mission of Russia. It. Um, it goes on to talk about the Russian expired me an additional investigation was also being conducted by the possible poisoning of the head of the provisional administration of Kirsten region.

Uh, with alleged chemical warfare agents, it added Sodo was a former mayor of the city of Kirsten and was appointed to head of the region of the same name when Russian troops overran it early in March. Uh, the par does not clarify whether the poisoning could have been caused by expired can't. Which is often found.

So he had the same poisoning. So they're using this consistently or allegedly not using it. Um, but there's some really bad spam in Ukraine, according to this article, because they seem to be writing it off pretty easily as food. Um, now. The next one is so, so that's the, the intro to this right over the last week.

That's in the last several days, we saw an article now about the potential of Ukraine poisoning, Russian soldiers. Okay. Now what we're seeing is a article that says that the car bomb kills the daughter. Of spiritual guide to Putin's Ukrainian invasion. Now this is a different headline than CNN originally had, which was Daria Dugina killed car killed in the car explosion.

And it was a Russian intelligence officer. So, so it basically was I, I can go find the exact heading of it. Um, but basically they changed the title of it to make it sound like some, like this guy was the entire reason for the war happening in the first place. Absolutely not the case, right. At least from my understanding it, I don't think anybody can answer that question, honestly, actually, I don't know.

And either is this CNN, but the original title of that article was daughter of Russian of Russian who was inspirational force behind Putin's invasion of Ukraine killed in a car explosion. You know, what they don't use in that title is the word civilian. It's not the intelligence officer who. Killed in a car bomb.

It's not a Russian soldier. It it's the daughter of an intelligence officer. So you're literally going off after family members going after family members of, of intelligence. That's a civilian that's again, a violation of the Geneva convention is killing civilians. This is a violation of the Geneva convent.

No matter what you do, nobody gets, unless you're the mafia, you shouldn't be going after people's family. And even then it's wrong, obviously. But in this case, if, if you're trying to curate world support from the United States citizens, the way to get to their hearts is not by bombing random people's children.

Right. And we're literally funding this entire war. Right. But let's go ahead and we'll, we'll watch this. I don't know if it's, uh, I think it's a part of the actual, uh, video. It says warning, this contains graphic information. So we'll watch it. We'll see if it says anything, if it's just the explosion, uh, which it looks like it is.

So let's see, I'll turn this down for you guys.

So it's basically just showing the aftermath of a car, uh, all down the road, a bunch of pieces of the car, everywhere. Daughter of an influential and prominent supporter of Vladimir Putin was killed yesterday. When her car exploded in a town near Moss.  that is according to Russian state media, which also says it is likely an explosive device was planted in the car.

Daria dinos was driving. Wow. And if that's her, she's, uh, probably in her very early thirties, late twenties, um, pretty blonde woman. Um, and now she's become the, the. Uh, become the victim of a bombing by obvious you Lee Ukrainian forces. So this says that Russian authorities said, uh, Sunday, that they had opened a murder investigation after the daughter of influential ultranationalist philosopher, Alexander Dugin was killed by a car bomb on the outskirts of Moscow.

So he's not even an intelligence officer. He's a Phil philosopher and they use the word ultra nationalist, right. Ultra omega, right. All. The ultra extremes of the world to justify the killing of random civilians. And this is coming from CNN. So let's see what they have to say about it. It says the Russian investigative committee said that believe someone planned and ordered the car explosion that killed D DIA Dugina based on the evidence already collected from the blast, taken into account that data already obtained.

The investigation believes that the crime was pre-planned and was of an ordered. Dugina said, uh, died in the scene after the ex an explosive device presumably installed in the Toyota land cruiser went off on a public road in the car, caught fire at around 9:00 PM near the village of I'm not even gonna try it.

According to the press service of the Russian investigative committee is re uh, reported by the Russian state news agency, T a S S. Duga uh, father is a Russian author in ideolog accredited with being the architect of, or spiritual guide to Russian's invasion of Ukraine. He is purported to have significant influence over Russian president Vladimir Putin and was described as Putin's brain.

Yeah, of course. You're gonna call that when you randomly kill the guy's daughter, he's a full philosopher. You don't get to kill somebody or their daughter for their thought. So here's a video of him. Uh, this is what he said about Trump and Putin in 2017, which I'm sure will frame him very well being from CNN.

So let's watch this or listen, I guess, cause I'm like, I don't have it downloaded, but let's watch it slash listen, cuz you can't see it.  go ahead Mr. Trump in Trump with trust. Meet the man who has been dubbed Putin's brain ultra conservative philosopher and TV personality. Alexander Dugin is a champion of Russian nationalism.

And he says, president Trump is on the same Waveland as long as I could. Uh, Judge on Donald Trump. I have remarked many, many similarities was my, uh, my thought and his integrational speech discourse was as if I would, uh, I would write it myself. Dugin Dugin is seen as one of the architects of Russia's growing ideology, a conservative nationalism with roots in the Orthodox church that is being exported across the world.

As an alternative to liberal democracy. November 8th, 2016 was, uh, important. Victory for Russia. And for Putin, personally, Dugin says that Putin didn't medal with the us selection, but that he provided Trump with a different kind of assistance. The real help of Putin to Trump was the example and notice how they immediately try to tie the guy.

Who's their favorite sports team. Ukraine's soldiers. Uh, they immediately try to try him, tie him to Trump and make him look bad to their, to their people so that they can shout from the rooftops that somebody who was pro chump and pro Putin's daughter got murdered in the street for no reason because of his pH.

So, well, let's go ahead and read. The rest of this says that both Duggan and his daughter have been sanctioned by the United States. The United Kingdom sanctioned Dugina in July for being a frequent and high profile contributor of disinformation in relation to Ukraine in the Russian invasion on Ukraine, on various online platforms.

Wow. Interesting. The United States sanctioned their family, uh, and now CNN's obviously. Finding some way to make this a positive thing that his daughter was killed. Videos of the explosion showed a vehicle on the fire at the side of the road and smashed car parts thrown across the surrounding area. One of them verified video appears to show Dugin at the scene.

A friend of Dugina said that he believed Dina's father was the true target of the blast, or possibly both of them as the car belonged to Alexander it's her father's car. Um, Desna drove another car, but she drove his car today and Alexander went separat. Uh, this was Andre Krasnoff who's the head of Rusky Goza or Russian horizon social movement in a personal acquaintance of dug Dina's family, Dina's family, um, a Russian foreign ministry official implied that Ukrainian state structures were responsible for the explosion.

A claim that Ukrainian authorities have denied. Of course you did, because you killed his daughter and you know, you're not gonna get public support surrounding. Even though CNN will try to make it a positive thing. Right? So they go on and on and on about this. But I guess this moral of the story here is nobody is in the right.

This is a ideological war and a war for claw, Schwab, and a war for, you know, the, the powers that be, if you want to use that term, the, the elites of the world, the, the, you know, you wanna include conservatives in there include, you know, the Bush family include the Clinton family, all of the corrupt, you know, huge, the Biden.

Crime family. All of them are a part of this and they know what's going on here. They were all funneling money through Ukraine, you know? So nobody's, nobody's in the right here, you know, obviously Russia's not in the right for invading a. What is believed to be a sovereign nation. Um, nobody is correct in starting this war.

It's a pissing match between Russia and the UN and really the us, because the us is just the representative in the world of the UN. Now we're starting to see that China's tensions with Taiwan are raising as they are sending missiles directly over Taiwan, which Japan just responded to saying that they're not going to allow it, and they're gonna do, uh, responses potentially.

As a result because they believe that it's unacceptable that that's happening to Taiwan because they know that they're next. Once Taiwan actually gets taken over, right. They're the very next step on that stool to creating the one China model. Uh, but we're seeing all of these tensions rise and we're seeing that Ukraine is not the Saint of a nation that all of the Democrats of the world are flying their flags believing.

Right. They're they're this is not. Right. Murdering a philosopher's daughter and then, you know, passing it off as being, oh, we didn't do that. Yes, you did. You're in war with them and you, you literally sanctioned them as of course, that's what happened here. I mean, I don't know don't this is all hearsay, but , but it seems very likely, right.

Especially when CNN's trying to make it a positive thing by tying him to Trump immediately. So. Pretty bizarre, pretty wild that we're starting to see, you know, and it's, it'll be interesting to see how people try to defend this, you know, people have gotten so, so balls deep in being team Ukraine at this point.

And, uh, how do you respond when they're randomly killing philosophers daughters for speaking out on social media platforms? And maybe it was, maybe it was accidental and maybe they were going after him, but even that's not okay. Right. If you're trying to be a pro-democracy state, that man is not a part of the governmental structure, that man is not a part of the military.

And according to the Geneva convention, he is not able to be a target in this war, just for speaking out on these topics. Okay. Is the UN gonna do anything about that? No. Is Nita gonna do anything about that? No, because this is their own proxy war right there. And, and especially when it comes to the, you know, what, we just talked about the poisoning of soldiers.

And, and especially when we're talking about the, uh, you know, murder of random, innocent civilians, that's on their hands. Right. We funded this. We funded this guys. If you don't understand that we, as the American citizens funded 80 something, however many billions of dollars now for them to go car bomb, innocent civilians with our tax money.

Are you okay with that? Because this was all fun, right? We were all pro not, we, I, wasn't a part of that. You'd know that if you followed me the whole time on this war, but I I'm neither take sides. They're both. But we funded this guys. And, and, and if, and nobody's saying anything about the amount of money that we're peddling over to Zelensky and his, his, you know, regime, all of the, you know, billions of dollars of weapons that our tax dollars have gone to, for them to be able to fight this war properly against Russia.

All of that is funded on the backs of you going to. You paying state taxes in, in national taxes, federal taxes directly from your paycheck, and then those that money, your money being sent to Ukraine, to poison soldiers around the Geneva convention and to blow up innocent civilians daughters. That's our money at work guys.

That's Biden's administration. That is what they're doing with your tax dollars. Instead of protecting your, our children at schools, that's our tax dollars at work instead of, I don't know, funding the proper, uh, conversation around abortion, right? How it should be properly framed in, in how people should, you know, we shouldn't be funding planned parenthood.

Maybe we should be funding education in schools. And that reproduction is actually the result. Sex and, and maybe we should be educating, uh, underdeveloped communities and, and, you know, minority communi. Maybe we should be doing that instead of, I don't know, poisoning Russian soldiers, uh, and blowing up in the, in the civilians, maybe some good ideas there.

Uh, but no, no, that's not gonna happen because, you know, 70%, this is a, a, a percentage that was given by somebody who was on the ground in the arms trade in Ukraine. I'll, I'll have to find the video, but, uh, he said that basically 70% of the weapons that are being sent to Ukraine are unaccounted. Only 30% of the weapons.

Now, I don't know if that's true, but it's his claim and it, he, he threw it out there frivolously it wasn't like he knew the exact percentage and was marking it down on a piece of paper. But that was his guess 30% maybe of the weapons that we're sending to Ukraine are actually getting in the hands of Ukrainian soldiers.

Where's the other 70% going. Maybe to the IRS  so, um, yeah, so maybe not the, the white hat government that we were thinking they were. Okay. Um, now I will save this article for the end of the episode. We'll talk about maybe the Google. Flagging this father as a criminal for sending pictures to his doctor of his child, which maybe you probably shouldn't do anyways, cuz that's a little weird, but uh, but anyways, we'll, we'll discuss that after.

Um, but the next thing I need you to do right now is head over to red pill, revolution.co, sign up for these subs stack, get the emails directly to your inbox that has the podcast. All right. Um, you're going to. Every single week, it is going to be a concerted effort on my behalf. You'll get it directly to your inbox, to have the links, everything that we're discussing here.

Um, and you will get the very first one I believe, uh, probably Monday, tomorrow. So, um, I will throw that together and you will get it directly to your inbox, red pill, revolution.co. The next thing you need to do is head over to the website and click on the link that says, get I. Okay. Click to the top, click the menu.

And the only way to support this podcast right now is by going directly to that link and signing yourself up for some life insurance. Now, you might wonder why you need life insurance. And I wonder the same thing, but then I got married and then I had children and I realized that, oh, life does actually go on when I die.

And oh, maybe if you don't have millions of dollars in the bank, you're gonna leave your family members in the worse off situation than they already are when you are not present there to support. All right. So if you have children, you have people that depend on you. You have debt that you don't wanna leave to your family members and you don't have millions of dollars in the bank.

Maybe, maybe just, maybe you should head your bet because 100% you're gonna die at some point. And you don't know whether that's gonna be today. You don't know whether that's gonna be a month from now, or I hope for you when you're 120 years old, but the likelihood of that is very low. So go get yourself some life insurance right now.

It's directly through me. I am your agent of record. Um, you can head over to the website, sign up, you'll see me as your agent. If you have any. Email me, Austin, red pill, revolution.co. And I would love to help you out answer your questions and maybe even help you pick out your policy. If you ask nicely,  all right, but you can do it all online.

It doesn't take more than, I don't know, 10 minutes to sign up. Um, 95% approval rating. All of that stuff. Great prices. I got a $2 million policy for myself for like 60 bucks a. Um, really, really awesome stuff. So head over there right now, you won't get any phone calls, none of that BS that normally comes with signing for up for insurance that I know very well about.

So do that right now. And then if you haven't subscribed five star review. Appreciate ya. Love ya. Now let's get into the next conversation.

All right. So next thing we're gonna do is we're going to discuss the big topic of today, which is the fact that the controversial, very controversial social media star, Andrew Tate, himself was banned from Facebook and Instagram this week. Now we'll read this article, which says that, uh, he was banned on Friday from meta platforms.

He says that the 35 year old was banned due to violations of metas policies on dangerous organizations and individuals. According to BBC, before he was banned, T had over 4.7 million followers on his Instagram account, the former kick BA uh, kickboxing champion discussed the band with popular Twitch, streamer, Aiden Ross.

And he said, I'm quite understanding of their position. It's not a big loss for me. It's not something I use. I'm kind of relieved because the real world is such a beautiful place. The less things on my phone. And it's just one less thing I have to look at. I'll just get in my supercar and go for a drive.

Wow. All right. So let's listen to just what he has says here. This, his 20 seconds about being banned.

If it'll play . Um, so basically what this guy is, is he, is you, if you haven't heard his name, you're probably not on TikTok. He's like half of my feed and I don't follow any of the accounts that he's actually a part of. Um, he he's a joke, but you know, we'll talk about it as you get banned. I don't know exactly why they Bann me.

Um, I just tried to log in Instagram a couple hours ago. Wouldn't let me, I have good people in the case. I trust due process with Instagram. I'm actually quite understanding of their position. I do understand it very, very well. I'm not angry at them in any regard. Uh, it's not a big loss for me. It's not something I use too often, but I do understand their position.

And it goes on to say that Tate told the Twitch streamer, he doesn't know why he was banned. We just talked. We just heard that part. So we'll skip that. It says that Tate's first rise of the limelight came when he appeared on as a contestant on the UK version of big brother in 2016. Don't know what that is.

He was kicked off of that for a video that came out that showed him allegedly attacking a woman, um, which was basically him sitting there. In some type, like this girl was in like lingerie on the couch. I watched it. You probably don't need to. Um, but she was in some type of linger on the couch and he had like a, you know, some type of leather whip that he was hitting her on her butt with.

And you know, it didn't seem very positive. It didn't seem, but it also. Could have been taken outta context in some sort of weird fetish thing, but it obviously is, you know, go watch the video cuz you'll see what I'm talking about. They show no context before or after he's just sitting there hitting her, but it's obviously looks terrible.

And if it's not something that they're both consenting to is very, very wrong, which probably talks about his whole, you know, ecosystem of conversations. This guy is all around the high hyper. Uh, you know, if, if there is a real thing such as toxic masculinity, um, I, I don't think it's masculinity is the wrong word.

This guy's just an asshole right there. There's no toxic masculinity here. He's just a douche bag. Um, so he, he goes on and on about how women are just. Tools and how, how they're owned by people or men. And, um, they're intrinsically lazy. And he, he says some pretty crazy stuff, right? And so it says that he was in 2017 during the height of the Harvey, Einstein allegations tape was suspended by Twitter for saying that women should bear responsibility for being sexually assaulted.

So we'll see if we can get the actual tweet of that. Um, I don't think I saw it when they posted it here. Uh, Now it says that, um, in these types of situations, while liberals screamed that nobody should rape women can walk around naked and men shouldn't look, uh, shouldn't look, you import waves of third world migrants, but that's a different point entirely.

My point is this. If my sister was raped, I'd be furious. However, I'd ask details and say, what the fuck are you drunk at a dude's house? You don't know. In those types of situations, pretending women are blameless and men shouldn't rape is stupid people shouldn't steal poor prep temps. Yeah. I'm not sure. I breed British very well.

Easiest way to protect your daughter, teach her self-awareness and to avoid poor decisions or ensure every man on earth. Uh, won't rape her. Uh, okay. So definitely a tinge of victim blaming there. Um, but you know, nothing that free speech. Allow for you to be an asshole. That's like kind of an interesting conversation about this is, do I agree with this?

Uh, do I think in today's censorship world, that if they are going to censor people based. Their thoughts, beliefs and discussions that, and how they negatively affect the real world, which is not what they're doing. Um, but let's, let's play in that fantasy world. If that is the case, then he should probably be on a list here after all of the weird things that have come up and all the shitty things that he's said.

But again, I don't agree with censorship at any level. So I think if you're a 35 year old man child, Look, and we character, you should still be able to show the world that you're an asshole for your words. And the world should be able to look at you and laugh at you and know that you're a joke and be able to judge you for the way that you talk.

Do I think he should be banned? No. Do I think he's a joke if you know, is he misogynistic? Yes. Is he an asshole? Yes. Is he, uh, somebody that I would want my son watching? No, he wouldn't watch him. Um, is he a caricature of what they want the right to be considered? Yes. Do I want that representing what fatherhood or, or manhood looks like on the, our, you know, on the more non left leaning people?

No. Is he a good representation to that? No, he's a jerk. He's an asshole. He's misogynistic. He he's a, a, seems like a piece of shit. Human being, to me, who's only focused on money and fucking girls, like he's 18 years old. Uh, and maybe at some point should have grown up and didn't uh, but do I think that he.

Have duct tape put on his mouth and can never talk again to the general public? No, I think they should be able, everybody should be able to look at him and judge him for the things that he says, because speaking is not a crime, nothing he did here is a crime on Instagram and Facebook. Now there are some crimes that do come up when you talk about Andrew Tate that are highly concerning.

That makes me think that yeah, nobody should be taking this guy's advice. One of which being that his house was rated for human traffick. Um, allegedly they found nothing. Uh, but let's see if I can find the article on that, where it says that. Um, alright, let's read, let's read this through here, because this article talks about some of the things that this guy has said, and then we'll watch a couple clips here of, of what he's actually said and to get some context.

So you can make your own opinion about it, because maybe you disagree with me. Maybe you like the guy. Um, I can't seem to find any way to like. In a leather jacket who wears sunglasses inside, calling out women.

 this article says that now this article comes from the guardian and it says inside the violent misogynistic world of T's new star, Andrew Tate, it says observer investigation reveals how the ex kickboxer and big brother contestant from Luton has gone from obscurity to global internet fame in months.

Uh, now it says that Andrew Tate says women. Now this is again, so take the context of this. Who's writing it. You know, I I'm trying to be unbiased in this. I do. Like this guy, it's not somebody I would want to hang out with. It's not somebody who I would associate myself with. It's not somebody who I agree with on a lot of his accounts of like, you know, and then again, I'm just looking at clips from TikTok that people are pulling that are probably the most wild things that he says, and maybe I'm wrong.

But from those wild clips that I've seen, you can't find wild clips of me justifying rape. You can't find wild clips of me saying that women have no value and that their property, you can't find it because I don't say that that's not how I feel. 

 Maybe I haven't listened to a full podcast of him, for sure. And maybe he's a nice guy, which I have heard from, uh, Tom Sura and his wife had them him on or something. And that's how he originally got to be pretty big and they seem to like him and think that he's a caricature and he's just playing this role and like making a bunch of money off of being ridiculous and that he doesn't actually believe a lot of the thing.

So give him whatever you want to, you know, give him in Grace Wise. But I, I just, you'll never hear that come outta my mouth because I. I'm not saying that because I don't believe it.  but it says Andrew TA says that women belong in the home, can't drive in our man's property. He also thinks that victims of rape must bear responsibility for their attacks and dates women aged 18 to 19, because he can make an imprint on them.

According to videos posted online. Now that is correct. I've heard that one in other clips, the British American kickboxer who poses with fast cars, guns, and portrays himself as a cigar. Smoking Playboy talks about hitting and choking women, which he also said, I heard that one and we'll listen to that one too.

Trashing their belongings. Stopping them from going out, um, will lead into some of these videos and read some of those afterwards. But it says that Tate's views have been described as extremely misogynistic by domestic about domestic abuse charities, capable of radicalizing men and boys to commit harm offline.

No, I don't think that's the case. Um, but whatever, but the 35 year old is not a fringe personality looking lurking in an obscure corner of the dark web. Instead he's one of the most famous figures in on TikTok where videos of him have been watched 11.6 billion times style is a self-help GU offering his mostly male fans, a recipe for making money, pulling girls and escaping the matrix.

Tate has gone in a matter of months from near obscurity to one of the most talked about people in the. In July, there were more Google searches for his name than Donald Trump or Kim Kardashian. His rapid surge of fame was not by chance. Evidence obtained by the observer shows that followers of TA are being told to flood social media with videos of him choosing the most social media clip or controversial clips in order to achieve maximum views and engagement.

Um, the coordinated effort involving thousands of members of Tate's private online AC academy. Hustlers university and a network of copycat accounts on TikTok have been described by experts as a blatant attempt to manipulate the algorithm in artificially boost his content in less than three months.

The strategy has earned to make huge following online and potentially made him millions of pounds, uh, with 127,000 members paying $39 a month to join hustlers community. Uh, many of them, boys and men from the UK and. Yet, despite much of the content appearing to break TikTok rules, which explicitly ban massaging the and copycat accounts.

The platform appears to have done little to limitate spread or ban the account responsible. Instead he has propelled him into the mainstream allowing clips of him to proliferate and actively promoting them to young users, uh, raised in the east estate of young London. Uh, Luton the SI the son of a catering assistant in chest master TA has been long making headlines for storing controversy through his twenties.

He worked as a TV producer and then he was a kickboxer. Nobody cares. Um, nobody cares. Nobody cares. Nobody cares. Uh, let's see if we can find the part about the trafficking. Uh, it says in another video, he was, uh, allegedly investigated by police for abusing a woman, which he denied in a case where he had his house rated devices confiscated and was held in a cell for two days.

Uh, it says that let's see.

Oh, wow. He also openly discussed being accused of violence against several women, although he has not understood to have ultimately been charged with any offenses. Um, in one interview, he describes an in incident where a woman, well, I can't talk today. A woman knocked a phone out of his hand in a club and a man punched him.

So they started wrestling and the tussle, he accidentally hit the woman and broke her jaw. He says, Wow. Also another thing you'll never hear about me  um, so it says that Tate has understood to have left the UK for Romania and one video explaining his reasons for the move. He suggested that it become, uh, easier to evade rape charges.

Wow. This is probably 40% of the reason he moved there. He said in one video adding I'm not a rapist, but I like the idea of just being able to do what I want. I like being. Free. I'd like to hear that video. I have not heard that one. Um, and I've seen it a, a fair amount of his videos looking and researching for this, but let's go ahead and watch a video so you can hear this dummies voice and see, and have your opinion for yourself on whether or not he should be banned from social media and being able to speak to the general public.

And here we. Someone breaks in the house. I'm not sending her to fight. It's my job, right? I have to risk my life to protect her. So when someone doesn't break in the house and I ask her for breakfast, I expect it to be made. You cannot stop. You cannot give up. You're in the most fantastic place on the planet for making money hustle's university.

And the only person who could ruin that is you welcome to the metaverse inject it into your brain. And if you only exist amongst the money, you're gonna end up with some money. Welcome, El. Do you think that women are property? I think my sister is her husband's property. Yes. When a bride is walking down the aisle to marry the groom, the father walks next to her and gives her away.

Ah, how you cheating you cheating. It's bang out the machete, boom in her face and grip her up by the neck, but show up bitch. All right. So there is some of the things that come up when you. Research some of these controversial videos. So let's start with the very first thing, which is his hustler's university.

Okay. Andrew T basically started his own pyramid scheme. Okay. Hustler's university is a pyramid scheme where he gets guys, I guess, specifically men to join this university under the idea that they're gonna make a bunch of money and he's gonna teach them how to make money. Like he made it. I'm not sure where he made his money from.

Sounds like it could have been from his sex trafficking. So maybe that's a bigger concern about this hustler's university. It should be called, uh, you know, trafficking university, but basically it's a pyramid scheme. He made a Ponzi scheme out of people distributing his own content for him for $39 or 39 pounds a month.

Okay. So basically what happens is you bring, you know, you come into hustler's university from a. Then you go take his content, you post it on TikTok with your link to have them go sign up for this hustler's university and do the same thing that you just did. You make a percentage off the people that signed up under your link.

He makes a percentage off of everybody. Here's him. You know, don't mind the pyramid that I'm making. Here's him, here's you? Here's the people you bring on it all trickles up and he makes the most money. That's a Ponzi scheme. There's no real value. He posts videos of him standing by Bugattis. Uh, like they're probably not rented.

I don't know the guy's probably worth some decent money. Uh, but. It's a pyramid scheme. That's all. This is right. It's nothing new. And, and it's allowed to, you know, a bunch of people are signing up for it because he's a wild, crazy, controversial figure, which you know, who cares. They should lose their money anyways to this man.

If you're dumb enough to sign up thinking this guy's gonna be the one who makes you rich, I tend not to take advice from almost 40 year old man, children in leather vests with cigars in their mouth, sunglasses on inside who claimed to get all the 19 year. You know, sex in the world, like, yeah, you're probably not the role model or mentor that people should be looking for.

Now. I think there's an interesting conversation there, which is this something people are actually looking for or is he gaming the algorithm, right? Is he gaming the algorithm through this Ponzi scheme that he created and then people are going and distributing a bunch of his content. And then he gets famous off of people giving him money to distribute his content, to make him famous, to give him money.

I don't know. I don't see how this I, you. Business wise seems to be working just fine for him. If 129,000 people are paying 39 pounds a month, but he's not the guy I'm generally gonna go look for advice for. And you know, it's speaking to the, the idea that is this something that TikTok is circulating, right?

The idea is that there's a segmented TikTok. There's a TikTok in China, that's all violin playing and math and science and, you know, making their children in communities, uh, uh, the best possible people they can be. And then them flooding our system. With these toxic ideologies with these, uh, terrible, you know, caricatures of what it means to be on one side or the.

Whether it's the blue haired, L G BT Z or Z, uh, you know, nothing against the LGS BS or the, you know, but the Ts are obviously a, a movement that's been coming up from social media, right? That's something that has not existed before this and, and is being pushed in, in pushed into our ideology, being pushed into our school systems, being pushed into social media accounts, to normalize it so that when your children get on TikTok and whatever damn age you get, and I've seen six year olds with cell phones on.

Whatever you give them to that that's gonna be what's flooding their, their, uh, their consciousness, right? So when you have somebody being pushed and pushed and pushed over again, it's, it's the laws of advertising, right? If there's numbers involved, eventually you get a certain outcome. And if there's a, how many billion views that 11 billion views of this guy has.

Yeah. How would the world, does it get to that point? If the algorithm is true to attention, which is showing that if you watch his content over and over again, or you watch the full video, it's gonna recirculate it. So apparently people are finding maybe just entertainment, value, controversy, value, whatever it is, the currency that he's trading in is attention.

And through that attention, he's pushing these shitty ideologies that are making, you know, are they corrupting young youth? Yeah. You get a guy who's on there talking super confidently and making him look super cool with his stupid sunglasses, his, you know, uh, shaved head in his Bugatti in the background, , it's it. Is it positive? No. Should he be banned? No, I don't think so. I think that he should be a, you know, should there be better, uh, understanding of talk's algorithms and should we allow them to flood our community with negative ideologies? No. Um, but that's a, that's a platform conversation, not an individual conversation.

Right. And, and maybe you wanna talk about meta and Instagram and Facebook making these decisions. You know, I don't agree what this guy says. Maybe put a content filter on there that says, you know, uh, should be 18 and up. And I, again, I don't even agree with that really. Um, but if you're gonna do something, there's no reason somebody shouldn't be able to talk.

Even if they're saying stupid, Bad rude things, right. If you can go outside and say, it's somebody, as long as he's not specifically calling on violence for somebody or, you know, um, literally that's about it that you can get in trouble for on the town square, then you shouldn't get, I believe wholeheartedly that social media companies should follow the constitution.

They should have to follow our us laws, at least when dealing with people in the us and in this case, This does not do that. He didn't say anything that was go kill X, Y, and Z go, you know? Uh, shoot. So and so, no, he didn't say any of those things. He made himself look like a douche bag. Now all the women and men who are right in sound in their mind know he's a douche bag and they're not gonna listen to him.

They're laughing at him. They're everybody. Who's like 99% of people who are watching this man are laughing at what a douche bag. And no, they would never want to come within five feet of him, no matter how confident you talk and how you spit out, you know, your, your coffee. When you talk about all the girls who want you and no, nobody, nobody likes that.

Women don't like that. And the women that do are the ones who are getting $45,000 worth of work done on themselves, because they're not confident in who they are. And that's not somebody that I would've want to attract into my life. So I'm not going to follow. Somebody who attracts women like that. Right?

The, the women that you want, if you are a young male is the one who is yeah. At confidence is attractive. Right. Of course, as always, right. Confidence is a number one thing. It means that you believe in yourself that you have some sense of self and that you, you know, confidence is an unbelievable weapon in life and you should learn to use it, right?

That's about 90% of who this man is. He has no substance, right? He, he can make a Ponzi scheme. Great. It's because of his level of confidence that he's able to, to present his content in the way that he doesn't give. Doesn't make him valuable. He doesn't have a amazing opinion on the structural foundation of our government.

He doesn't, he doesn't add value to making you a better person to the people that are around you. No, he's gonna, if you emulate him in everyday life, he lives in a fantasy land, a fantasy land. If you acted like that to people around you, they would fucking hate you. Nobody wants to go get a drink with a guy who wants to rant about girls for two and a half hours when he is 40 years old and a leather vest with a cigar in his mouth and his sunglasses on.

Nobody wants that. He's a caricature, he's a joke, but should he be banned from social media? I don't believe so. I don't believe that's the right move. I believe you should let people see how much of a joke and a douche bag that. And then that will work it out. He'll be a fizzle in the wind in a year from now, right?

These people do not last these controversy focused individuals, you know, even look at the Kim Kardashians of the world. They're irrelevant. Nobody cares about you. Now go watch Jordan Peterson. If you're, if you're thirsty for a mentor in life, go listen to Jordan Peterson, go, don't go. Listen to Andrew T.

And watch Jordan Peterson will be around for decades as long as he's alive, that man will have value in society because he gives value to society. This man is a deflated balloon of confidence wrapped in a leather jacket, standing in front of a Bugatti and a girl who looks like she's a bra stall. If you remember what those are.

so, um, that's my thoughts on this. All right. Now let's watch one last clip of this douche bag, and then we'll move on to that last article that I talked about, about Google, uh, basically going after a father. So here it is, find the old one. Who's a bit older who hasn't had too much experience in life, or sat around with some dork for a while or whatever, but in general, this is also one of the reasons men find youth attractive.

You wanna blow up the internet, I'll pull up the internet, right? Fucking now the reason 18 and 19 year olds are more attractive than 25 year olds is cuz they've been through Les. I'll say this right here on the fucking internet. I don't give a shit. I'll say this right there around the internet. I'm a pedophile.

I'm a weirdo. I'm a 40 year old jerk off who wears leather to interviews and sunglasses inside everywhere I go. Who of the sound mind goes onto a podcast? That's going to be seen by this is from the full send podcast. Um, and these guys are like baffled by him. If you watch this full interview, they're like, do you actually act this way?

Girls families and people, you know, in real life or are you being totally, you know, fake here. Um, but you see the way that they interact with him is like kind of standoffish. Like, does this actually work for you in real life? Or are you, is this entire thing fake? Right. So, but here we go. Now I just think that's funny that he's like, oh yeah, I'll break the internet right now.

I'm a pedophile. Yeah. Yeah. Thanks. You didn't break the internet. You just had a self profession that if the, this is the thing that I think. People who come on here and say like, oh 18 and 19 year olds, if you're 24, 25, 30, 30, 5 40, almost like this dude is, and you're sitting there bragging about 18 and 19 year olds.

All you're saying is you're a pedophile and that doesn't being with an 18 or 19 year old legally does not make you a pedophile. But what does is the fact that if they moved that down to 17, His number would've moved down to 17. If it was 16, he would've moved that down to 16. If it was any lower than that, he would continue going.

But he only goes to that number because that's the legality surrounding it. Right? So now you know who this person is, what his belief systems are surrounding sexuality around children, around, you know, young adults. And literally when he goes on to say this, he's saying that they're more manipulatable, more manipulatable.

They can manipulate  he can manipulate them.  manipulable.  and that's his reasoning. Oh, they haven't had as much Derrick they're like, oh, okay. Yeah. Yeah, because they. Just coming out of high school, you weirdo that, that doesn't make them intrinsically more valuable because, and, and then again, he he's like he there's clips of him going, oh, a key that opens many locks.

There's a master key, but a lock that's opened by many keys is a shitty lock. Like. It's just a flawed, a flawed idea of, of roles, right? Like, no, a guy who goes off and sleeps with 150 women, it doesn't make him intrinsically valuable. Yeah. Maybe he can pick up women because he has confidence or because he has money or because those women saw value will in him specifically, but that doesn't make him valuable because he did that and it doesn't make a woman less valuable because she did the same thing that you did.

Yeah, maybe just don't go sleep around. Maybe that's the proper idea. You know, maybe you as an individual, as a man, shouldn't be sleeping with hundreds of people, either. You idiot. Anyways, let's watch this video. People will sit there and go, oh, you can't say that. Yes, I can. A 19 year old is more attractive than a 26 year old woman.

And I'll tell you why. Cause that 26 year old has talked to more guys, been to the club. More times, been more places, been fucked and dumped more times more arguments, more heartbreak, more bullshit, more mess for me to clean. Whereas a 19 year old might have had one guy from high school just broke up.

She's fresh and I could fucking put my imprint on her, make her a good person. May put my imprint on her. You mean grooming her. You mean taking a child at 18 years old and grooming her to being the person that you can manipulate so that when you talk to her, the ways that you do the in public, cuz if you talks to the people this way in public, and he talks about women this way in public, just imagine what he's doing behind closed doors.

When a camera's not on him and he doesn't have a microphone in his. Like it's, it's wild to me that this guy, so I in no way shape or form like this guy at all. Right. I think he's a douche bag. I'll, I'll tell you that a hundred times over again, he's the exact caricature definition of an, you know, insert whatever term here, but he still, I, I just think that the, the social media platform banning is just not, not the move.

So let's listen to some more stupid things. This guy has to say without her having to go through all that detriment to learn about life. So what's your key age range? 19 to, it's not, it's not just about the age range. It's the example. No, I know, but what's your, what's your pre what's your preference? I mean, hot girls are hot girls, right?

Yeah. I know hot girls are hot girls, but my point is that older women. The reason they're less attractive to men, even if men don't instinctually understand it is because they've been through a whole bunch of more shit. And, and we not interested in dealing with someone else's problems. If you get with a girl who's 26, 27, she's gonna be sitting there going, I know men like you I've seen what men like you do.

You ain't going out. I, I don't like that. I, I ain't dealing. So you're telling me, wait, wait, you're telling me you were innocent and sweet for this. You were nice to him. He fucked you and messed you up. And now I deal with the attitude problem you've developed because he got your pussy. I didn't even want him to fuck you in the first place.

You should have been a Virgin when you met me. No, he just thinks that she thinks you're an asshole because she's not a naive child who can see through your BS. Like . Now I'm dealing with your shit. Get fucked. Goodbye. Don't you think though, the, you know, trying to find purity out of women, it kind of is like a low possibility.

I mean, it's kind of like when a woman says, I want a guy that's like six feet tall, whatever the case may be. Right. There's less to them. And like, it's like, dude, you can't really find a virginity. The, the best things in the world are low prob. It doesn't mean it's not what we desire. We're talking about we, what we desire and what I'm saying is that one of the best things about status is that you can now get what you desire.

So at status, most men have this dream of sleep with endless women. All right. So I'll leave it there with you guys. This guy's a, a, a creepy weirdo. Who's obviously interested in grooming. Children has gone to has had his home rated for trafficking, which you can't say about very many people that, you know, Hmm.

So maybe he's in some circles that he shouldn't be, maybe he moved to a country that he's should, you know, went to specifically for according to him, 40% of the reason was so they didn't get caught in rape charges. Like, yeah, this guy's a shitty person, but. Should he, you know, is he calling for the mass violence against people?

No. People should look at him and he shouldn't be employable outside of his own Ponzi scheme because he's an idiot who says stupid things and yeah. Is it going to affect youth? Absolutely. Should he be circulated the way that he is on TikTok? No, but should he get a piece of tape over his mouth and not be able to speak because he says outlandish shit, no, throw a, not safe for work thing on there.

And. People go after him for being a shitty person. Like they all do everybody, like besides his 120,000 people that pay money to get advice from this pedophile. Nobody likes this guy. Everybody thinks he's a douche bag. Okay. So, but again, that comes back to the free speech. Absolutist side of me, uh, which seems to be a good term that a lot of people are throwing around now.

So anyways, now the last article we're going to discuss is going to be a Google, uh, picking up a dad, uh, saying a dad, took photos of his naked toddler for the doctor. Google flagged him as a criminal. Google has an automated tool to detect abusive images of children, but the system can get it wrong and the consequences are serious.

So that Mark's noticed something amidst with his toddlers. His genitals were swollen and it was hurting him. Marcus stay-at-home dad in San Francisco, grabbed his smartphone and took photos of the document to, uh, to document the problem so he could track his progression. It was a Friday night in February, 2021.

His wife called an, an advice nurse at the healthcare PR provider to schedule an emergency consultation, uh, by video. The nurse had to send photos to the doctor so they could review them and advanced Mark's wife grabbed your husband's phone and texted a few high quality closeups of his genital through the iPhone so that they could upload them to the healthcare provider's messaging system.

In one Mark's hand was visible, helping to better display the swelling. Um, his wife gave no thought to the tech giants that made this quick capture in exchange of digital data possible or what the giants might think of the images. Yeah. Because you're giving access to Google, Google for all of your photos.

Like there's like that's. Difficulty with iCloud. That's the difficulty with Google with Androids is you're literally allowing them to run AI, scraping bots on every little piece of information that you have on your phone, which is terrifying. Now, there is a use case for this. Obviously I am a hundred percent against, as you probably just heard about Android Tate against pedophilia and about against, you know, child pornographer, distribution, pornography, distribution, and, and I think it's wrong, but you know, misfires like this, make the AI.

Data scraping on cell phones, like look really bad. And do I think that they should have automatic access to every piece of information that you have in your personal life? No. Do I want pedophiles who are distributing child sex? Uh, pictures and horrible things like that around in jail and found. Yes. Uh, but it's, it's an interesting like di dichotomy, like almost like trolley equation, right.

Which is worse. And that comes to like the LORs. Should AI bots be the ones that are going after criminals. Right. And again, here's some weird, weird trolley questions for you. It says it was, um, let's go ahead and read it a little bit more, um, says with the help of the photos, the doctor diagnosed the issue and prescribed antibiotics.

Um, mark, who is asked to identify by his only first name for fear of potential reputational harm has been caught in the algorithmic net design. To snare people exchanging child sex abuse material because technology companies routinely capture so much data. They have been pressured to act as sentinels examining what passes through their servers to attacked and prevent criminal behavior.

Child advocates say the company's cooperation is essentially combat at the rampant online spread of, um, sexual abuse imagery, but it can entail peering into private archives, such as digital photo albums. An intrusion users may not expect that has cast innocent behavior in a sinister light in at least two cases.

The times has unearthed

now welcome to the revolution now that you know that you're still here on the podcast.  um, now it goes on to say that Google probably thinks that was child porn. Um, two days after the photos of a son's March phone made a blooping notification noise, his account had been disabled because of harmful content and there was a severe violation of Google's policies and might be illegal, a learned more link led to a list of possible reasons, including the, uh, pictures that he.

It goes on to go a big thing about how they actually found the images, what they did about it. This is a severely wrong article. Um, Or long, long article, uh, but guilty by default is the very last thing. It says that, uh, the law professor said that cooperation, the technology companies provide to law enforcement to address and root out child sex abuse is incredibly important, but she thought it should allow for corrections from Google's perspective, it's easier to just deny the people, these use of their services.

Otherwise the goo, uh, company would have to resolve more difficult questions about what's appropriate behavior with kids, and then what's appropriate to photograph or not. Mark still has hoped that we, he can get his information back. The San Francisco police said that the contents of his Google account preserved on a thumb drive.

Mark is now trying to get a copy. A police spokesperson said the department is eager to help him. So he's not even allowed to use Google anymore. Right? Pretty crazy, pretty wild. And on that note, I will leave you guys today. If there's nothing that you want, Google. Having a view scraping off of your phone.

maybe you should second. Guess what you have on there. . So thank you guys so much for listening. I appreciate you so much head over to red pill, revolution.co.com is for losers. Sign up for the subst stack. Um, get involved. You can watch everything there, listen to everything there. And I hope you guys have a wonderful, wonderful day.

In this week's episode we discuss the recent raid of former president Donald Trumps Mar-A-Lago estate for stolen classified documents. We also discuss the recent moral high ground people are taking to protect "MAPS". We also take a deep dive into the IRS potentially doubling in size after a recent bill passed the senate which was immediately followed by a job posting stating that the IRS position would require carrying a firearm and the use of deadly force. 

Subscribe and leave a 5-star review!

----more----

Welcome to the revolution.

hello and welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams and thank you so much for listening today. We have a few very crazy topics to cover. I don't think one that we expected to have to cover after the, you know, Nancy Pelosi Taiwan situation. It's like literally back to back to back to back like crazy wild events, which I guess is good for the news and podcasting world, but kind of wild just to be an everyday citizen, trying to do your job and be a good father and mother and person with friendships.

But here we. So we might as well talk about it.  so on episode number 39 of the red pill revolution podcast, we are going to discuss 86,852 new IRS employees now to be hired after a bill passed the Senate. And on the back of that, the IRS posted literally today posted a job posting, talking about hiring, essentially IRS agents who are willing to pick up a weapon and use deadly force.

I wonder what type of tax of agent warrants, the IRS murdering us citizens . So we will discuss that. We are also going to jump into the, obviously the Mar Lago Trump situation, Trump, this. Was rated by the FBI. So we will discuss what happened. Uh, we'll also discuss who signed off on this and, uh, some of the comments that some famous people talked about and kind of my thoughts on it.

So we'll discuss all of that and more today. But before we do that, the first thing I need you to do is go ahead and hit that five star review button hit that subscribe button. It would mean the world to me. And I know you're thinking about it. You're like, man, why would I do that? Well, you should do it.

Cuz I asked you and I said, please, please  so hit that subscribe button again. It would mean the world. To me. There's not very many things that you can do right now where you're sitting, where you can get some good karma. I talk about that all the time, but you truly can. It means a lot to me just hit that subscribe button takes two seconds.

And if you didn't do it the last 20 seconds or so that I've talked about it, just do it right now and I'll stop talking about it. I'll give you two seconds. Ready. All right. Cool. Now that you've done that  then let's go ahead and let's jump into it. And here we go. Episode number 39 of the red pill revolution podcast.

Welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams. Red pill revolution started out with me realizing everything that I knew, everything that I believed, everything I interpreted about my life is through the lens of the information I was spoon fed as a child, religion, politics, history, conspiracies, Hollywood medicine, money, food, all of it, everything we know was tactfully written to influence your decisions and your view on reality by those in power.

Now I'm on a mission, a mission to retrain and reeducate myself to find the true reality of what is behind that curtain. And I'm taking your ass with me. Welcome to the revolution.

All right. So the very first thing that we were gonna discuss was a bill was passed hiring, allowing the hire of 87,000 new IRS agents who are going to come after everyday citizens, swarming every little deduction that you have ever taken  in your entire life. Uh, now this is, and if you realize how many people actually work at the IRS currently, it's about half of this.

So they just doubled their working force and in the attempt to recoup and reclaim all of the money that they have frivolously spent in Ukraine. . So I wonder if you take the, I don't know what the number is at this point, like $80 billion or so that we've sent to Ukraine. Um, I wonder how much of. Uh, IRS attempt is now not only in an attempt like, so they're not only spending your tax hours, frivol frivolously, they're hiring, uh, or they're sending it to a war that we're not a part of.

And then to fund their overspending and the inflation that they've caused themselves. They're now going to go back and recheck your taxes. You know, the taxes that they already spent on everything they've wanted to spend, uh, by hiring and doubling their working force to do so now that's not as crazy as the next topic that we're gonna discuss, which is absolutely a part of this topic, which is, you know, we already kind of talked about with the, I.

Having job postings talking about deadly force. Uh, but let's go ahead and read this article about the 86,852 new IRS agents. It goes on to say that you've probably heard Republicans say the inflation reduction act. The massive spending bill with just passed by Senate Democrats, including provisions to hire 87,000 new internal revenue service agents.

The number seems too big to believe the I, the IRS currently just has 93,654 employees, according to the office of personnel management. By the way, this article is coming from the town hall. Uh, now it goes on to say that why would Congress in one bill increase the IRS workforce by something like 92%? It doesn't seem possible that math does not add up anyways.

It certainly doesn't seem wise. It's not wise, but it is possible. And that's why, what 50 Senate Democrats, along with the tie breaking vice president Kamala Harris. I wish I could do a good impression of her laugh  um, did, when they passed the inflation reduction act, which gives roughly 80 billion to the IRS now, and, uh, 2031, the name inflation reduction act was a RO to convince gullible voters that Democrats are actually doing something about inflation.

If you were curious where this, this, uh, news articles, uh, bias lies, the bill itself is made of expensive climate measures. Plus prescription drug provisions, tax increases in initiative to increase IRS enforcement. The inflation inflation, the inflation reduction act is the slim down version of the even more massive build back better bill.

Interesting. I did not know that. Which failed earlier this year, due to the opposition of democratic Senator Joe mansion, we know a lot about the IRS provisions of the new bill, because the same provisions were in the build back better plan, which the administration extensively promoted, you know, the build back better plan.

That was basically the ideation coming off of the book written by clause Schwab himself, you know, the, the true evil, uh, puppet master. It says that's where the 87,000 figure comes from in May, 2021. The treasury department produced a 22 page analysis of build back better. And in supporting tables, the documents had, the bill would add 86,852, or, uh, full-time equivalent employees to the IRS between now and the year 2031 do a little rounding.

And there's the 87,000. Interesting. So I had no idea that this was approx, just a smaller ideation of the original built back, better plan. And if you don't know about that, I'm pretty sure. I'm actually positive that that whole idea of build back better comes from the world economic forum. 100%. They had a whole like, uh, a whole meeting where all the world leaders came together, talking about the build back better plan, according to Claus, Schwab, I guess my K Schwab is maybe a little bit better than Kamala Harris, but probably a little bit closer.

Toula  um, although you're probably not too far off with Kro and Dracula anyways. Um, so I find that to be somewhat concerning right now. There's a clip here that's been circulating about Peter Ducey, uh, where he discusses, um, why they may be doing so in the concerns about the 87,000 people. And it's at the back of it, we'll actually watch it on the backs of one of the clips that we're looking at, discussing the FBI rate of Donald Trump.

Because it's kind of like a really end snippet during the white house, press secretary discussion on that. Uh, but what she says is that they're only going to go after people who make more than $400,000 a year. And now this article actually talks about that. And that is what they consider to be upper class, not middle class.

So they're going to be going after people who make more than $400,000 a year, and nobody under that line. Now she goes on in that same discussion to call them taxi VAERS and tax. I don't know what the word she was, but it was somewhat venomous term to describe everyday people who are literally just trying to fill out bullshit forms so they can pay your salary dummy anyways, uh, Pretty crazy, but not as crazy as the next one.

The next one that we're going to discuss here is what they immediately did. Following this bill being passed by the Senate, they immediately posted a job posting. So everybody's already wildly upset by the fact that the IRS is more than likely going to audit, basically everybody in the United States now, um, as a result of this, you know, according to them only people who make over $400,000 a year, but obviously that's not actually going to be the case.

Um, so let's look at what the more concerning part of this is, but before we discuss that, the next thing I need you to do is go over to red pill, revolution dot. All right now you can actually go to my website, which is red pill, revolution dot C o.com is for losers. So head over to red pill, revolution.co, and you can actually sign up for the subst directly on there.

You can see AC I redid the whole website. I've been spending a ton of time on this guy. So, um, trying my best over here to learn how to build WordPress websites for you.  and I think I did the decent job. So head over to red pill, revolution dot C, and you can actually watch all of the video episodes. You can get all of the podcast links.

You can look at reviews, you can sign up for the subst stack and on these subst stack. Every single week, you are going to start getting a podcast companion, which includes all of the articles, all of the links, all of the, um, talking points of what we discussed, the video episode, the podcast episode, all of that, right?

In one place directly to your email, uh, about a day or so after the podcast comes out. All right. So head over to red pill, revolution.ceo, and you can sign up for the subst stack directly on my website there. And just, if nothing else, check it out. Tell me my website sucks. I don't know, but I think I did a pretty good job.

So head over there right now and sign up for the subst stack. You'll get all of the articles, links, videos, everything for free for now. All right. So I would appreciate it now on the backs of that, let's go ahead and talk about what piggybacks that last topic, which is the IRS is seeking armed accountants, ready to use deadly force.

Now the IRS posted a job posting today, which caused immense backlash from the general public. I wonder why. When you have a bunch of nerds sitting there using Excel spreadsheets all day now holding AR 15 assault rifles, looking to kill everyday citizens because you , you deducted a, a lunch meeting when, you know, there's a secret agent sitting there with earpiece and listening, and then all of a sudden pulls a gun on you and shoots you in the head because they know that wasn't the proper deduction.

I could just almost, I can imagine the amount of skits that you can make off of this. Um, but there's probably a lot, right? I'll just, let's, let's go with, um, instead of double oh seven, it's gonna be, you know, agent 10 99.  I don't know. There's so many, so much good material in this. Um, but you'll let the comedians work that out themselves.

Uh, so this is wild. So I'll read this article a little bit for you. Um, I don't, I wanna shy away from reading too much, uh, because I have some shit to say myself. Um, but this goes on to say that even before Congress and president Joe Biden give the final, okay. For the IRS to hire 87,000 more agents. Uh, and again, that's a good thing is that this bill still has yet to pass Congress or Joe Biden.

Um, so we still have a chance to not, you know, maybe potentially get killed by IRS agents, which would be a positive, uh, but, um, the final, okay. For the IRS bill to hire 87,000 more agents and the 80 billion package, the tax agency is revealing a priority job category that could get first dibs on the huge budget expansion on its job page listing of vacancies for special agents at the IRS to be placed around the country to root out financial fraud.

But these are opening more than just financial experts. They will also be armed among the requirements listed is to carry a firearm and be willing to use deadly force for the I R S. If necessary. It says when, when I'm sorry, when is it necessary for anything to do with financial obligations, filling out tax forms for an IRS agent agent 10 99  to, to be carrying any type of weapon and perhaps rating houses, just like the FBI just did to Donald Trump.

I can only imagine what they're gonna be doing here, but it's quite concerning. And, and if you don't know, the IRS has been purchasing millions of dollars of ammunition over the last several years. Millions of dollars. Now I wonder where that money came from. Oh yeah. The IRS is spending your tax dollars buying ammunition so they can arm themselves to go raid your homes and then kill you as a result of going into your home to figure out how much money you didn't pay them for them to pay themselves, to buy more ammunition, to kill more Americans.

What the fuck kind of weird clown mirror multiverse. Did I end up in where the IRS is hiring special agents to use deadly force? I don't know. I made, if you've seen the movie, if you, if you haven't seen the movie, I guess it's, uh, everywhere all the time. Something like that. Every place, I don't know.

Probably one of my favorite movies that's come out in the last five years. Um, it's like everywhere all the time. I don't know something like that. Um, go check it out. Cause that movie is incredible. It just it's actually ironically written by the same people who write the, uh, Marvel movies, where the multiverse is such a consistent topic.

But it's a, it's quite interesting to see how they actually go about the multiverse situation and, and to see those sprinkles of the multiverse be like riddled into our entertainment, uh, is quite interesting too. It's something I'm interested in researching further and doing a full episode on, because I think the multiverse theory is quite an interesting one.

Um, but I definitely made a wrong decision somewhere to end up in the multiverse where all of this wild stuff is happening.  and apparently so did you, so I'm sorry that we made these bad decisions together  so the article goes on to. That among the job requirements listed, it is to carry a firearm and be willing to use deadly force if necessary, special agents who can be placed around the nation and the world have an interesting job.

According to the IRS description, they are financial analysts and armed officers ready for a shootout. Um, there was a tweet listed by Ford Fisher who I believe started was the biggest tweet, uh, that kind of started this, eh, maybe not the biggest one, but it was a part of it. Um, getting into something what, where people found to be interesting enough for it to circulate this way.

And it was directly from the IRS website and it says some of these standards that the individuals have to conform to in order to operate under this, you know, agent 10 99  is to adhere to the highest standards of conduct, especially in maintaining honesty and integrity work a minimum of 50 hours a week, which may include irregular hours and be on.

24 7, including holidays and weekends. Keep in mind, this job is like $55,000 a year to 70,000 potentially. So not only are you overworking, you're underpaid, you're on call. Like you're a medical surgeon and you're carrying a firearm willing to use deadly force, like your double oh seven . Um, and then it also says be willing to able to participate in arrests, execution of search warrants and other dangerous assignments.

Now he goes on to say that they will combine accounting skills with law enforcement skills to investigate financial crimes, all income earned, both legal and illegal has the potential of becoming involved in these crimes, which fall within the investigative jurisdictions of the IRS criminal investigation.

And this is from their website, which talks about the criminal investigation, uh, branch of the IRS.  and it says, who are we? The criminal investigation is the law enforcement branch of the IRS. Our mission is to serve the American public. You mean shoot them in their house for forgetting to deduct something properly anyways, to serve the American public asterisks by investigating potential criminal violations of the internal revenue code and related to financial crimes in a manner that fosters confidence in the tax system and compliance with the law.

As a special agent, you will combine your accounting skills with law enforcement skills to investigate financial crimes. Special agents are duly sworn law enforcement officers who are trained to follow the money. Ooh, cool statement IRS, no matter what the source all income earned, both legal and illegal has potential becoming involved in these crimes with fallen within the investigative services.

He goes on to tweet that while the newly hired feds are required to carry a firearm and be willing to use deadly force, the government adds the criminal investigation. Special agents are a part of a diverse workforce that. Mirrors the tax paying public, we serve. Interesting. Um, and also here's a interesting article which backs up my former claim about the, all of the ammunition they've been buying between March 1st and June 20 or June 1st, 2021.

The criminal division of the IRS has ordered seven or $696,000 in an ammunition. And the IRS told verify in an email in 2018, the report, the IRS showed it to generally spend $675,000 on ammunition a year in the previous seven years. So in a single year, they spend as much as they did in seven years. So what, how crazy is that?

And if you don't know, like the cost of ammunition, it's about, you know, depending on what you're shooting is about. Uh, I don't know when I. Ammunition was about a, well, I never bought ammunition. Um, but uh, last time I didn't buy ammunition. It was about a dollar round for like 5, 5, 6, a little bit more for blackout rounds.

Uh, nine millimeter. I mean it all falls falls generally around that nine millimeter can be a little bit more expensive. So if you take that, obviously they're buying it in bulk pretty big bulk, um, that $675,000 or $700,000 in a year amounts to about just let's go easy dummy math, about $700,000 worth of rounds more because they're buying it in bulk.

What in the hell is the IRS doing with $700,000 and are 700,000 rounds of ammunition? What, what in the world could they be? What type of operations is the IRS conducting or are they just stockpiling this? So when Biden inflation continues to occur that eventually they can come after everyday citizens who disagree with them, audit them.

Kick down their door. And if you don't comply with them and fill out your tax forms properly, they're gonna shoot you in the head. And that, uh, article about that came from verify this.com sounds super legitimate.  it's like one of those fact checking websites, maybe. Um, I know, um, so pretty wild. The fact that the IRS is looking to hire special agents to conduct raids on every day.

Citizens we'll see where it goes from here, but I think this, I legitimately think this stuff's about to get pretty wild over the next, I don't know, five to seven years or so. Um, we'll see, you know, just seeing how much damage has occurred in the last 365 days. I don't know how long, you know, since the presidency occurred, how much inflation has occurred, how how much gas prices have gone up, how much food prices have gone up.

Um, and we'll actually look at some of these, uh, discussions here in a second about that. Um, In the Peter Ducey questionings here.  but the next topic that we are going to discuss is going to be, there's better clip that's been circulating and I've tried to just shy away from these topics. Like I said, in the last episode, like my stuff is just like so far shadow band to beyond oblivion on like Instagram.

I have 50,000 followers, 200 people see my story. Um, so I would always appreciate it if you share my stuff, it's literally the only way that my stuff gets out. Um, all social channels are red pill revolt, uh, pretty easy to find backup channels. Uh, just two Ts on the back end. Um, so anyways, uh, I don't know where I was going with that.

Oh yeah, yeah. Yeah. I've been trying to get away from the topic of discussing like the trans the, you know, but there's one that really sticks out to me. That's bothersome. And it's the situation that we're seeing. There's a TikTok video. That's been going around a, um, some weird type of sex therapist talking about maps.

And if you don't know what a map is. You do, you just don't cushion the title because you see them for what they are. So let's go ahead and watch this video. We'll see what this woman has to say about it. And then we will discuss it as always. And here we

go, folks. My name is Miranda. I use she her pronouns and I'm a licensed professional counselor and sex therapist in Erie, Pennsylvania. And today I wanna talk about minor attracted persons, and I want to talk about minor attracted persons because they are probably the most vilified population of folks in our culture.

And most folks are making incorrect assumptions about them without actually knowing much about them. Yeah, the assumption is that they're pedophiles. There's no wrong assumptions there. If you are a. You are a minor attracted person. You are somebody who is interested in minors sexually. Maybe we should.

You know, I, I, I've been really hating the label of murderer lately. We just call them individuals who like to end lives. And the acronym is I L E L I LS are the new ones that we're going to protect individuals who like to end lives. I am so sick of everybody in the world, just hating on the, I LS the individuals who end lives.

It is the, one of the most outrageous things that everybody wants to jump on. The backs of these. I LS the fact that you want to call out these people who end lives. They, they don't control that they have these urges to kill people. They don't have, they don't control that at all. Just like I like to go on walks.

They like to murder people. There's nothing wrong with that urge. Now we just need to stop this right now. We need to stop it in its tracks, because if we don't stop this right now, the I LS of the world, whereas you call them murderers. They're gonna feel bad about themselves. Oh, poor. I LS. What could we do?

Everybody's assuming they're bad people. They're not bad people. They just have urges to kill people anyways, and those assumptions create harm for an already marginalized population. You may have noticed that I'm using the term minor, attracted persons, sometimes abbreviated to maps instead of the more commonly used term pedophile.

And I'm doing this because the term pedophile has moved from being a diagnostic label, to being a judgemental, hurtful insult that we H at people in order to harm them or slander them. I also prefer person first language that recognizes that any label we might apply to a person is only part of who they are and doesn't represent everything that they are.

Yeah. It just talks about the part of who they are that wants to sexually assault minors who cannot consent, what kind of mental gymnastics. And I think that last analogy pretty much sums it up of how ridiculous this is. Nobody's marginalizing this group. This group is literally people who want to sexually assault children and children cannot consent.

If you wanna argue the fact that people should be able to do this. You're wildly, obviously you're you are in that class of individuals. Otherwise you wouldn't be arguing that, but you have to understand too. There's like this movement behind there, there literally is. If you're saying there's not watch this video, watch this individual, who's trying to do mental gymnastics and play these PC games and trying to, and that's what I've said all along.

It's the whole reason for the acronym, right? The ABC, the FGS of the world. Eventually the plus turns into a M there's going to be an M on there. Eventually if enough people like this don't seek don't get enough resistance immediately by the general public. This woman is literally sitting here protecting, and I guarantee you, I guarantee you with every fiber of my being that this woman does not have children guaranteed.

This woman does not have children because this woman's sitting there literally thinking through the idea of her being the pedophile. And wanting to defend the pedophile, not the child, not the innocent individual who cannot defend themselves, not the in innocent individual. Who's not allowed to be advertised to legally because the implications of them not being able to realize when somebody is trying to take advantage of them for profit, literally there's advertising laws against advertising the minors.

You wanna know why, because they're not fully developed and they cannot reasonably understand when somebody is trying to take advantage of them for profit. So if you can't reasonably advertise to somebody who's under 18 specifically, why should you be able to take advantage of them sexually? It blows my mind that this woman she's has a bald head.

Still know, she's a woman, , she's a woman. This woman is sitting here and especially trying to like speak immediately, starts her sentence with a, um, with a, uh, figure of authority, right. She tries to present herself as I'm a licensed sex therapist and, and somebody who, you know, whatever bullshit a, you know, uh, she, she tried to claim herself to be as, as a person who knows better than you, who calls people, pedophiles, pedophiles, right?

Just it's just a label. It's only a part of who they are that likes to sexually assault minors. It's, it's so crazy to me, so wild to me. And I think that like I L E L scenario, like just perfectly sums it up. If you wanna say that it's just part of who they are that they wanna murder. They have this internal urge to snap a neck from somebody beside them.

like, where do we, where do we draw the line here? If we're not gonna draw the line that literally, if you go to jail, if you go to jail, The only class of, of criminal, not murderers, not the worst of the tax of the world, that the IRS is going after the people who the incarcerated individuals. And we'll talk about that in a second, because that's wild too.

New York just decided to change the name of inmate to incarcerated individuals. Um, but when you go to jail, the only class of individual who is looked at as the scum, the scum of the jail is the pedophile. You're the ones that you are going to literally probably get your ass kicked over and over and over and over again, because you're the worst of the worst of the worst of the inmates that are in there.

And they hate you for the actions that you did to the citizens or the children. That you conducted them on. And this lady, this licensed sex therapist has the audacity to sit in a public forum, put out this video and believe that she was in the moral high ground for protecting individuals who want to sexually assault minors.

That's where we're at. That's the multiverse that me and you find ourselves in today when we took a left turn, because we chose to eat a hot dog instead of a hamburger  like seven years ago. Um, it's, it's so crazy. We're halfway through the clip. So we'll watch the rest of it. Here. We are all people first with many different facets or parts of ourselves.

And this includes folks who are attracted to minor. So to start with, let's talk about what a minor attracted person is or who they are. This term simply means that the person has an enduring sexual or romantic attraction to minors. They've not chosen this attraction just as the rest of us have not chosen whatever our attraction is.

You don't get to choose to be heterosexual or to be gay or, or whatever you are. And you don't get to choose to be a minor attracted person. Some minor attracted persons are attracted to a specific age range of minors while some are not. And some minor attracted persons are exclusively attracted to minors and are not attracted to adults at all.

Some minor attracted persons are also attracted to adults. Wow. Thank you for that riveting discussion. And the clarification as to what a pedophile is. We know we're well aware of what a pedophile is. We've known this for millennia. What a pedophile is, didn't change my opinion on what a, that we should be out here, singing praises and doing parades for the maps of the world.

Now you should probably still get your ass kicked in prison for doing horrific things to children, not changing my opinion on that. So I don't know. It's, it's, it's so crazy to me that this woman gets on there speaking from her moral high ground and thinks that people want to hear this, like thinks that she's like defending the, the, you know, individuals of the world who need to be defended.

No, they don't need to be defended. They're predators who prey on children because they're sick in the head. Just the same way that. Somebody who murders somebody. It's just a facet of who they are. It's a small part of them likes to slit people's throats. You know, they're a dad, they're a husband, they're a, they're a brother.

They, they like to play basketball on the weekends. And some nights after 11:00 PM for approximately 20 to 25 minutes, they also like to murder people.  we shouldn't, we shouldn't, you know, be mad at them for that. It's just an urge that they feel inside of them to do so crazy. It, it, I, I literally cannot say anything more about that besides the fact that that woman needs to lose whatever license she claims to have.

If she actually has one or needs one for the profession that she's in, because she's obviously just as insane as the individuals that she feels the need to. All right. Now, the next thing that we're going to discuss is going to be the biggest topic of discussion, which has been.  on everybody's mind recently, which is probably a wild indication of where our nation is going or not our nation, but the governmental agencies that claim to protect us.

Um, so let's just jump into it. Donald Trump's Malago estate got rated by the FBI in a situation that has never happened in the history of the United States. The FBI has never rated a former president's house looking for documents or for any other reason. Now we'll get into some of the details of why we actually think this might be some of the crazier theories on that.

Um, but actually one thing that I forgot was the, the New York thing on that, basically what, you know, I skipped over that thought train there, but let, let me go back for a second. What ended up happening is New York decided to de change their definition of inmate. To incarcerated person because they believed that they were a marginalized group.

So let's see if I can find an article that explains that real quick for you, because I think it's pretty weird where we're getting to where we're trying to pad the idea  of, of we're. We're literally trying to protect those of us. Now. I am, am a firm believer that the United States, the freest country in the world is not that we're the exact opposite of that.

We have more incarcerated individuals than the next three first world countries combined, and more so than like almost every other country under that combined as well. So I believe that we far, far. Imprisoned people in the United States, way more than we should, way, way, way, way more than we should. Okay.

Um, so let me start with that premise. I, I do not believe that we should be incarcerating people at the rates that we are. I think that we are the, you know, you claim to be the freest country in the world, but yet you have more humans behind bars than any other country at all in the world per capita, by far per capita and even more than just the average statistic.

So, and then on the backs of that, you know, you have the re situation where we're literally trying to trade Russian mobster, arms dealers called like the, what is, I don't remember his name, but it was like his, his, uh, like nickname was like the bloody something. I don't know it was something wild, but we were literally trying to trade a arms dealer who was going after us citizens with bombs, for somebody who was smoking weed or bringing on marijuana cartridges in Russia.

Yet. We have hundreds of thousands of fathers, mothers, daughters, humans sitting behind bars today, eating bullshit food because they wanted to smoke something, eat, ingest, something that is literally legal in however many states today, like 17 or more states at this point, marijuana's legal and we're negotiating terrorists to free this one individual in Russia.

Yet we have hundreds of thousands of people behind bars today, and it's still a federal schedule, one drug. I don't know how I got in that tangent, but anyways, back to New York , which is that New York is to, uh, New York changes the term inmate to incarcerated individual with the goal. Let's see that article's gone.

Um, New York to scrap inmate in favor of incarcerated individual in new state law said New York will no longer refer to prisoners as inmates and will instead call them incarcerated individuals. According to a new law, um, democratic New York governor surprise, surprise, Kathy. Hoel signed the legislation Monday.

She argues that removing the term inmate will help to reduce a harmful stigma against incarcerated people by correcting outdated terminology. Oh, you don't like the sound that I say with my mouth, Missy, in, in New York, we're doing everything in our power to show that justice and safety can go hand in hand.

We can make our streets and communities safer by giving justice involved, individuals, justice involved, indivi, what the fuck? What are we doing here? Next thing you know, Webster is gonna be changing the definition of incarcerated. We can make our streets and communities safer. She says by giving justice involved individuals, the chance to complete the rehabilitation program and work at the same time by treating all new Yorkers with dignity and respect, we can improve public safety while ensuring new Yorkers have a fair shot at the second chance.

Oh, you think changing the word is gonna do that for them. Democratic state Senator. Gustavo Rivera sponsored the legisla legislation through the New York state legislator. According to Rochester first for too long, we, as a society have thought of incarcerated individuals as less than people, the use of the word inmate further dehumanizes and demoralizes them.

This is another concrete step. Our state is taking to make our criminal justice system one that focuses on rehabilitation rather than relying solely on punishment. The New York law is the latest example of a trend among Democrat Democrats, Democrats. That damn did I just come up with a new slogan?  is a new trend among Democrats to adjust current terminology, progressive Democrats, uh, Republican, or I'm sorry.

Progressive Democrats like representative Corey Bush have also pushed towards referring to mothers and women as birthing people wrong. When we talk about birthing people, we we're being inclusive. It's that simple. We're using gender neutral language when talking about pregnancy. No, because pregnancy's not gender neutral bitch.

Only women only. Uterus is only vaginas have the power to birth children. And you cannot take away from women. The fact that they're literally superheroes who can 3d print organic material better than any machines or science that we have today, you cannot take that superpower away from them is the most incredible thing that a human can do ever.

And only half of us can do it. And I could never claim to birth a child, been a part of several births. I have several children and I cannot do what my wife did. Cannot do it promise you no matter how hard I squeeze, no matter how much I push my belly out, I cannot have a child. Um, anyways, so that's wild.

How many words, like in true 1984 fashion, all of the definitions are being changed to appease the Democrats. And I, I, it's just so weird. It's so bizarre that we've gotten to this point. Um, but anyways, I just wanted to elaborate on what that actual idea was before I moved on. So I know you were just so thirsty to wonder about new York's use of the term incarcerated individual

So anyways, let's go back to the Donald Trump situation. So Donald Trump's Malago estate was recently rated by the FBI for reasons that they say is specifically due to 17 boxes of documents that he took from the white house, some containing classified information. So. Is that bullshit probably. Um, there's probably many, many other reasons, you know, they could probably have come up with a far better excuse than that, but that is the current reason why they're saying that they did.

So we will find out, obviously there will probably be very little charges. Donald Trump seems to believe from an articles that I've read that they are doing this to make sure that he cannot run again in 2024, if nothing else is going to embolden him and his followers to continue following him and to continue pointing at what is going on in their nation today with extreme concern.

Because if they can literally raid Donald Trump's house, they can very, very, very, very easily do it with no pushback to me. And you obviously, right? None of us are as powerful or as rich or as capable legally as Donald Trump. And they did it to him without. Even giving him a search warrant, allegedly, uh, and, and kicked out his attorney, which we'll find out in an article that we discussed about that Eric Trump talks about.

So one of the first things that came up with this is people talking about who actually executed this, who signed off on this warrant. And one of the more interesting, uh, things was this list that came out of three individuals, Bruce rein. Bruce Reinhardt, if you don't know who Bruce Reinhardt was, he was a, uh, lawyer who attempted to assist with the trafficking, uh, uh, the individuals who were in trouble after the Jeffrey Epstein case.

So he literally helped protect the sex trafficking, uh, and individuals who were maps.  the, the gross, disgusting pedophiles who were a part of Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring. He went to protect them. And, you know, we were talking about why people's houses, who should actually be rated. Right? And we'll look at that in just a second.

But, so these were a few people who signed off in this Bruce Reinhardt. He helped sex traffick or Jeffrey Epstein escape from any real justice. This tweet side, which comes from Robbie S. He also talks about me Garland being the other one, which says Trump took his nomination away from the Supreme court.

And then Chris Ray, who's the FBI chief that Trump tried to fire according to this individual, over his horrific job performance. And they all signed off on the rating of president Trump's house. Now we'll look a little bit more into each one of those because I find it to be interesting that these individuals are the ones who decided that he's the one for these documents whose homes should be rated.

Now the first article that comes up talks about, uh, let's see if I can find it here. It came out of the, uh, same one that I read earlier, town hall. So we'll see if we can find that article. Um, but it talked about, uh, Merick Garland. And it says that mayor Garland faces possible impeachment. I believe this was just a statement made by Ram Paul, but they say that he was confident that attorney general me Garland could face possible impeachment over the FBI raid of formal or former president Donald Trump's Florida estate, predicting that a full investigation won't happen until after the midterms commence in November.

Paul demanded for the order to raid Trump's house to be revealed. Um, yeah, probably not happened in there. Um, now the, uh, other thing that came up out of this was that. Let's see if we can find it here. So this was about Bruce Reinhardt. Now this is a tweet that came from comfortably smug, quite the Twitter name.

Um, but it says that on October, uh, this came from, oh, it doesn't say where the article came from, but it says on October 23rd, 2007 as federal prosecutors in south Florida were in the midst of a tense negotiation to finalize a plea deal with accused sex traffick or Jeffrey Epstein. A senior prosecutor in their office was quietly laying out plans to leave the us attorney's office.

After 11 years on that date, as 11 emails were flying between Epstein's lawyer and federal prosecutors, Bruce Reinhardt. Now a federal magistrate opened and a litigation li or a limited liability company. Sorry. It's like blacked out on that spot limited liability company in Florida that established what would become his new criminal defense practice.

The stated address, according to. Florida state corporate records was two 50 south Australian avenue, suite 1400. It was the same location, an identical suite number as that of Jeffrey Epstein's lead attorney. Interesting. It says by the end of the year, Reinhardt had resigned his post. Um, in the district of Florida within days on January 2nd, 2008, he was hired to represent several of Epstein's accused accomplices, who would later like Epstein re receive federal immunity for allegedly trafficking, underage girls.

Allegedly Reinhardt's defection was one of many, highly unusual turns that the Epstein case took 12 years ago moves that could merit examination as the multimillionaires controversial non prosecution agreement is dissected in the wake of this arrest last week on sex trafficking charges. That was an older article, but interesting, nonetheless, that this is the individual who's signing off on Donald Trump.

If you're curious if this has any political motivations and is purely justice doing justice things, probably not somebody who cares about justice is the person who's helping people get out of sex trafficking minors. All right, so let's go ahead and let's watch the clip of Peter Ducey, um, going back and forth with the new press.

Secretary don't really care for her name yet. Um, but here it is. Thanks. KA. Do you consider Donald Trump to be a political rival of president Biden? I, I'm not gonna speak to that from here, but you talk about Trump all the time. So do you consider him to be, I don't talk about Trump all the time. Ultra Maga, you guys were criticizing his handling of COVID last week.

You've mentioned his January 6th response a couple days ago. So can you say based on all that? I, I didn't say anything about Marla. I'm just asking you if you considered the president, I'm saying from here, I'm not gonna comment on that. Does the president still, so you're not gonna comment on the idea that he's a political adversary.

He was literally the person. Biden Rangan. That's the definition of a political adversary.  why you're, if you're deflecting that question, I'm sure you're answering literally nothing. And if you've been watching her over time, she's even worse than her predecessor, which was very difficult to do, but she doesn't even seem to E attempt even to answer questions and even circle back as the term would be before.

Uh, but she doesn't even answer that. And then you'll see here, she goes on to literal. Basically answer none of these questions, but, um, still interesting to see how she reacts nonetheless by, eh, I don't bring up his name. Yes, you do. Every single conversation they have in that room at least drops his name one time or another.

Want to, uh, think that he would be very fortunate to run against Trump in 2024. Like he had said before again, I'm not gonna comment on it's just, it's just spoke. I'm the president in the next election. I'd be very fortunate if I had that same man running against me. Does he still, oh, I can tell you, Peter, is that the president intends to run in 2024?

Is there a concern here that if you guys don't say more than these Republicans who are accusing this white house of weaponizing, the justice department weaponizing, the FBI are, that's gonna become the, the public sentiment. If you guys don't say once, and for all, we are not doing that first, first of all, We're just not going to comment on the department of justice investigation.

Okay. We're we're just not going to comment on that. Is this white house weaponizing, the justice department and the FBI against, against political opponents? The president has been very clear, uh, from before he was elected. Very clear on this. Hold on throughout his time in office, I heard the quote. We will be playing the quote tonight at six o'clock.

I actually do appreciate because there's probably very little other actual individuals in that room that actually push back against this. As you can see how uncomfortable the sea of individuals is around him as these journalists. Uh, but I can appreciate Peter Ducey because he's actually, he's quite quick on his feet to realize what she's doing to realize.

She's literally just parroting a quote that he already said, and he's quick to jump in and go, okay, I get that a hundred. Now actually answer my question. Are they weaponizing the FBI? Because as we saw, they did this to project Veritas, they raid their homes for the Ashley Biden diary under the direction of Joe Biden.

Very, very clearly. There's no other reason. And they found nothing. They'd prosecuted. Nobody, nobody went to jail. They're literally intimidating people. Like they're a, a mob, the mafia of Joe Biden, right? Why, why else would the FBI be kicking down the doors of journalist homes searching for a kid's a woman's diary?

Why a diary, by the way, that outlines that there was inappropriate showers with Joe Biden, that she believes affected her sexual urges later in life, that she believes made her hypersexualized. And the reason that she looks at sexuality, the way that she did, which is why it was such a big deal and why it got hushed so bad when you can actually go find the Ashley Biden diary.

If you look at her subst. Red pill, revolution.com or directly on red pill, revolution dot COO back a few, few, few episodes, probably 10 or so episodes ago, I actually listed it in one of the Biden hunter Biden, deep dives that I did. You can get the full diary right on there. Uh, I listed it in there for you and gave the link, but, uh, the diary outlined a bunch of weird things.

You kind of saw some, you know, it gave me some empathy for Ashley Biden and seeing the situations that she's in and the mental health issues that she deals with and the family issues that she's dealt with and hardships and stuff. But one of the things that stood out about that was the fact that she talked about trying to unravel her difficulty with sexuality later in life and believing that she had inappropriate showers with her father, uh, in her early years, which comes at no surprise when you see that a hundred by or a hundred Biden.

Well also him, but Joe Biden sniffing every child that comes within three feet of him. 30 feet of him, even in some cases  crazy. Uh, but weaponizing the FBI against project Veritas for legally obtaining a diary, the president's daughter's diary, like how crazy, how wild is that? That imagine if somebody steals your daughter's diary and you hire a mob of individuals to go kick down their door to go see who found it.

That's what the president of the United States did with the FBI here. And now again is doing it against the guy who he is a political adversary of no matter how much she doesn't wanna say it is a political adversary of is now sending the FBI to his home, to raid his home with weapons in hand to find documents.

Right. Of course. But again, I appreciate what Peter Ducey is doing here because there's very, very, there's no other clips that we're finding of anybody. There's no other clips of any other journalist who's pushing back in these white house briefings the way that Peter Ducey does and for him to jump in.

And, and really, and now I would love to hear why can you not say yes or no? Why would you not want to answer the fact that the FBI is not being weaponized by the president of the United States to go after a former president in the way that nobody's ever done ever in the history of the United States ever?

Why would you not just say no, we're not doing that. That would be illegal. You can't even comment that it's illegal because you don't want it to come out later that there was some connection between Joe Biden and the FBI raiding a former president's house

is this administration weaponizing, the justice department and the FBI against political opponent. Peter, the president believes in the rule of law, the president believes in the independence of just say of the department of justice, say yes or no, just is white house. No, it's a yes or a no for you. I'm answering the question in the question is a yes or no question.

What do you mean? You're answering the question. You're not answering the question. You're skirting around it in every way possible. You're not saying no, we are not. Or yes, we are. You don't get to that's. That's how questions work, especially a question that says, are you doing this? I believe in the justice system of America.

No, it's a yes or no question. Answer the damn question. You may not like it, but I'm answering the question and I'm no, Nope. I'm answering the question and I'm telling you that we are not going to comment on a criminal investigation. The present has been very. I laid out what his thoughts were back on January 7th in 20, in 2021 about how he saw the department of justice.

And I'm just going to leave it there. We are not going to comment from here from this white house on a criminal investigation that is currently happening. And just one more about the inflation reduction act, who, and here's where he goes down to talk about the IRS situation. So I will, we'll let it run for here for a second.

So we can circle back to the original type of archive, beginning part of our conversation. So here's that I'm here decided that Americans were crying out for more interaction with the IRS. I, I don't understand your question. You have to say more. Do you think it's gonna be popular when the 87,000 new employees hired by the IRS, go around and start auditing people to pay for the inflation reduction act.

So it's very clear. Uh, the IRS commissioner was very clear on this. He said that on, on the record,  that this only will, it will only apply to those earning over $400,000. The commissioner said, and I quote, these resources are absolutely not about increasing audit scrutiny on small businesses or middle income Americans.

As we have been planning, our invest investment of these enforcement resources is designed around treasury directive. That audit rates will not rise relative to recent years for households making under $400,000. So no audit. This is, this is focus on those who are, uh, uh, you know, corporate wealthy tax sheets that Republicans, congressional Republicans wanted to, uh, defend that's who they wanted to defend.

They wanted to defend those corporate, uh, tax sheets. This is not about, this is not about that. This is not about folks who make less than $400,000. So no new audits on anybody making a hundred, $400,000 here. No, very clear. No. She failed to mention, she failed to mention the part where they were literally arming these IRS agents and giving them the use of deadly for the

What is it? The license to kill of double oh seven, like, gosh. All right. So there's that. And then the last one that I will leave you guys with here is going to be the comment of president, uh, former president Donald Trump's, uh, associate Dana white, who talks about the Mari Lago raid, which I thought was an interesting perspective on it, which we'll talk about more in just a.

Uh, another one of your friends, Donald Trump. Yeah. Just had his place rated. I was wondering if you had any thoughts about that? Yeah. Um, I it's it's madness, man. The, the whole, the whole, the whole world is crazy right now. Some people have mentioned that we now live in a post constitutional America or a banana Republic.

Yeah. It's interesting, man. I don't even know what to say. I don't even know what to think about any of that stuff. I, again, cuz I don't know enough about it, but uh, yeah, I can think of about, you know, without getting political right now and getting into all this  bullshit, but there's 10 other people's houses that probably should have been rated before, before his, that haven't happened.

So it'd be interesting to see how this plays.

I love that response. There's 10 other people whose houses should have been rated. You know what? And I wish he would've given names, but since he didn't, I will, here's 10 people who should have been rated before Donald Trump. The first one talking about assassinations is Hillary Clinton. The body count just keeps rising for the Clinton family and nothing at all is done about it ever.

There's a guy who literally shot himself twice in the head. There's a guy who hung himself, shot himself in the head and then crawled three miles, maybe. Maybe you should raid her house. The next person is Zoe J Simpson. He definitely killed that woman. The next one is Nancy Pelosi, skirting every, every insider trader law ever, maybe raid her house.

And you'll find exactly where all, all of the, uh, you know, the legal stock information and the real boxes that you should be looking for here. Next person I'll throw on that list is P Diddy because he definitely killed Tupac.  this maybe raided his house. The next personnel list is prince Andrew, who is the creepiest pedophile in the history of humanity next to Jeffrey Epstein on every plane ride ever to grope and sexually assault underage girls.

The next one would be the man, the big guy himself, Joe Biden, for many, many reasons, including collusion, as well as profiting from his position as vice president of the United States, among many, many, many other things that hopefully come out. Once we see the, you know, hunter Biden situation be followed up on.

And speaking of hunter Biden, the individual who is now flying on the plane flying literally on air force one this week was hunter Biden. Meanwhile, Donald Trump's home is getting raid and the individual who is showing that he was inappropriate with individuals in his own family who are underage, who had literal documentation of working his father's influence with China, Russia, and Ukraine.

Uh, the next one would be bill gates, obviously for many, many reasons crimes against humanity and all of the people that he killed under his own doctorate over the last several days. And then the other one would be bill Clinton. Oh, and I didn't even mention Anthony Fauci, the rat of all rats, who is literally responsible for all of the death of aids individuals, all of the deaths of the COVID situation.

Uh, so many, so many, so many reasons go read the Robert Kennedy Jr. Book to find out exactly why, but there, there is 10 individuals who should absolutely have had their homes rated before Donald Trump did. There you go. And that my friends is what I will leave you with today.  all right. So a wild situation that has occurred, um, and we will see how it plays out.

If anything actually comes of this, it seems like in attempt to intimidate Donald Trump or else we would've had a search warrant listed everywhere. It would've been plastered on the walls. The exact reason, every news article ever, if they actually had dirt on him, would've talked about how Donald Trump was gonna be arrested and, you know, it's bullshit and just an attempt to intimidate him.

But I. As always time will tell. So again, thank you guys so much for listening. Go head over to red pill, revolution dot C oh.com is for losers. Head over to the new website. Tell me what you think. If it sucks deal with it, I'll make it better over time, but I think it's pretty cool. So I think you'll have a different opinion than that.

So head over there, you can sign up for the sub stack, uh, directly on my website, red pill, revolution.ceo. Um, one thing I'm excited about coming up is that we're going to be doing more of our roots episodes, which is deep dives into topics like history, uh, pharmaceutical industry, uh, all of these different topics.

The next one I'm gonna jump into is going to be on seed oils. And following that, I have an episode coming out where I'm going to be doing my very first interview style episode here, discussing the. Chinese organ trade, um, which is this horrific, horrific stuff going on in China right now. Um, so many awesome, awesome things.

So head over to red pill, revolution.co right now, sign up for the subs stack, um, become a part of the revolution. I would appreciate it so much and I hope you guys have a great day. Um, all of the socials at red pill revolt, um, again, share my stuff. I'll be putting out more and more content consistently, um, and hoping to move to two episodes a week as I've kind of jumped into, but moving away, one of those episodes from the current event, style two more of our roots of the red pill revolution podcast, which is deep dives into history, uh, finance, financial collapses, and things coming up like that.

Bitcoin, um, you know, the pharmaceutical industrial complex, uh, all of these things, the education BS that's going on and indoctrination of our children and the youth. So many awesome, interesting topics that I am going to be diving. Very very deep every single week, um, and giving my perspective on, in historical accounts on, so become a part of it.

Uh, subscribe five star review. It would mean the world to me, red pill, revolution.co. And thank you so so much for joining me today and welcome to the revolution. Have a great day. See you guys next week.

In this week's episode, we discuss Nancy Pelosi's recent visit to Taiwan. Nancy says she supports Taiwan's democracy while the white house says the exact opposite supporting the "One-China" policy. We discuss the real motives of her visit which may or may not have to do with insider trading. We also discuss the Alex Jones trial where his lawyer "accidentally" sends years' worth of texts to the opposing lawyer completely undermining their entire argument. 

Subscribe and leave a 5-star review!

----more----

Welcome to the revolution.

Hello and welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams, and this is episode number 38 of the red pill revolution podcast. And man O man, it has been an interesting, interesting last week or so we have inched our way closer and closer to what could potentially be a catastrophic disaster for basically the entire world.

Uh, basically what's happened recently is Nancy Pelosi has took it upon herself to check on her stock investments.  allegedly, uh, basically going over to Taiwan. And causing what is a international catastrophe with China then Boeing up to the United States and all sorts of craziness. In other news, Alex Jones was accused of perjury after his Sandy hook.

Parents' lawyer obtained his test tax messages from his own lawyer. Uh, so that's gonna be something interesting to talk about. I guess Alex Jones is currently, uh, going through legal proceedings regarding, uh, defamation trial or some type of, uh, civil lawsuit regarding the Sandy hook shooting and saying that it did not happen.

So we will discuss that, but really today's conversation. Uh, conversation's going to be going over a lot about Nancy Pelosi starting an international incident, and we'll find out why, what China said and everything in between. So stick around on today's episode, number 38 of the red pill revolution podcast.

Again, thank you so much for joining.

Welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams. Red pill revolution started out with me realizing everything that I knew, everything that I believed, everything I interpreted about my life is through the lens of the information I was spoon fed as a child, religion, politics, history, conspiracies, Hollywood medicine, money, food, all of it, everything we know was tactfully written to influence your decisions and your view on reality by those in power.

Now I'm on a mission, a mission to retrain and reeducate myself to find the true reality of what is behind that curtain. And I'm taking your ass with me. Welcome to the revolution.

All right. Thank you guys so much for joining me again. Episode number 38 of the red pill revolution podcast. And the very first thing that we are going to touch on is the Alex Jones trial. All right. It says this article that I have in front of me right here, it says Alex Jones is accused of perjury after Sandy hook parents' lawyer obtains his text messages and what could be the worst blunder ever by any lawyer at all ever  which quite atrocious move on your lawyer's part to basically completely, uh, send every little piece of evidence they could to the.

Opposing team's lawyer.  literally the worst thing you could possibly do. So we'll read through this a little bit, this article here about it, and then we will watch the clip of Alex Jones basically caught with his pants down. I have my own opinions on this. I have my own opinions about Alex Jones. Um, but whatever you believe about it, this is pretty hilarious.

So what this article goes on to. Is that the lawyer representing Sandy hook parents in Alex Jones' damages trial said Wednesday, that Jones' lawyer sent him years worth of text messages and emails from Jones's phone. It goes on to say that Jones who was repeatedly says, has repeatedly lied, that the Sandy hook shooting was a hoax has already been found liable in defamation cases, brought by families of the victims.

The Texas jury in the damages trial will determine how much Jones owes victims' parents after publicly making false claims. What they're saying, uh, 12 days ago, your lawyer messed up and sent me an entire digital copy of your entire cell phone with every text message you've sent for the last two years.

That is how I know you lied to me. When you said you didn't have text messages about Sandy hook. And that is the attorney mark Bankston, who is the attorney for the Sandy hook victim's family. And this was on Wednesday, uh, today. And, uh, so it goes ahead and says that worth noting judge Maya, Guerra gamble of the Travis county district court, who is presiding over the case, told jurors the contents of Jones' phone were not properly turned over when it should have.

Okay. Well, if you watch this clip of Alex Jones is the judge on this case. It's like pretty apparent that this judge is just wants nothing to do with Alex Jones is fed up with his trial is a little agitated by anything and everything that he does. . So let's go ahead and watch this clip here, because again, it's, you know, I have my own thoughts about Alex Jones.

You know, like everybody, uh, says he's got this crazy demeanor about a lot of things. He's been right about several, several things. This is not one of them, in my opinion. Um, this Sandy hook situation is quite atrocious. Just like all of the other mass shootings that we've seen is horrible, horrific. Um, And again, the way that Alex Jones went about it.

I I've said this before about shootings. I've said this before about the conspiracy world that comes up when you talk about these, uh, these shootings in these schools. And I, I just don't, I think it's off the mark. I don't think that there's crisis actors. And I don't think that, you know, people are going on the stage and, you know, if anything, that's so many loose ends that it, it is just so unprobable.

And so sloppy of, of an idea that, you know, to actually implement that there would be so many people who would have to be in on it, that it would just make it such a difficult situation to follow through on. And, and again, there would be so many people who would know what happened there would, it's just a mess.

So I, I just don't think that's the likely, the likelihood is there. I don't think that there's a bunch of actors in this situation. I don't think that's what's going on. I do think, however, you. You wanna put on your tin foil hat for a minute, that there is federal agents who are on chatboards with people who are saying horrible, horrific things with these, you know, young people who are in terrible frames of mind who may or may not, uh, talk to them in these types of situations.

And there's a lot less loose ends that way. Um, but anyways, let's go ahead and watch Alex Jones, uh, get caught with his pants down here.  every text message he's ever sent over the last several years, being given to a lawyer  this is just worst case scenario, right? Like if you're on a, if you're on trial, you know, for literally anything.

Let alone a trial that's getting watched by hundreds of thousands, if not millions and millions of people. And literally the enemy standing across from you in the courtroom has every piece of evidence has every little flirt TA just text message you sent to your wife has every little, you know, bad day that you had every little, uh, I don't know, uh, name that you called a friend that you don't want them to know about.

I mean, literally every little dirty secret in those text messages and worst case scenario, it gets sent to the opposite team's lawyer. All right. So  just, uh, I, I, it just horrific situation and, and I guess it raises a lot of questions, right? Like he, the, the lawyer actually goes on to say that your lawyer didn't even.

Stop us from bringing this to court, right? Like your lawyer didn't even attempt to write his wrong. And literally in any situation as a lawyer, how are you not checking the recipients of your text message that you're sending everybody or, or every text message ever that somebody's ever sent that you are defending?

I dunno, it just seems like a crazy, crazy happenstance to find yourself in. If you're one of the most controversial figures ever, literally one of the first people ever to get banned on all social medias before even Trump got there, you know, is quite impressive if you ask me, but alright, here's the clip.

We'll go ahead and watch it. And, uh, I think it's just about a minute or so, so we'll see what, what it, what goes on on it. Here we go. So you did get my text messages and it said you didn't nice trick. It's just  yes. Mr. Jones. Oh, indeed. You didn't give this text message to him. He doesn't, you don't know where this came from.

Do you know where I got this? No. This lawyer sounds like an evil villain  because yes, Mr. Jones, indeed, I do have these text messages. , it's every evil villain of every animation ever. I'm just gonna restart that for you. So you can actually listen to this beautiful evil villain laugh by this lawyer. Once he feels like he has Alex in the corner.

I can't imagine how excited this lawyer was to actually get this trial, especially in a time where I don't know if there's been any other specific time in history where court cases have been so publicized and, uh, you know, just so in the public eye as the last six months or so even. Um, but anyways, listen for this beautiful, beautiful Disney villain laugh by this lawyer.

So you did get my text messages and they said you didn't nice trick. That's just not . Yes. Mr. Jones. Oh, indeed. You didn't give this text message to him. You don't, you don't know where this came from. Do you know where I got this? No. Mr. Jones, did you know that 12 days ago, 12 days ago, your attorneys messed up and sent me an entire digital copy of your entire cell phone with every text message you've sent for the past two years.

And when informed. Did not take any steps to identify it as privileged or protect it in any way. And as of two days ago, it fell free and clear into my possession. And that is how I know you lied to me. When you said you didn't have text message about saying, okay. Did you know that? I see, I told you the truth.

This is your Perry Mason moment. I gave them my phone and Mr. Jones, you need to answer the question? No. Did you notice? No, I don't know this happened, but I mean, I told you I gave him the phone over. Just that, just answer the question you said in your deposition, you searched your phone. You. And that's where we really, you can start to see the judge just like rolling her eyes about the whole situation.

She's just so fed up with having to actually sit here and do this trial. You know, she, she goes on, if you listen for her, you'll hear just the irritation and agitation in her voice. As she's speaking to somebody, you know, being Alex Jones on this trial. And then she actually directs it a little bit at the other lawyer because she probably feels the need to balance out her frustration  for the public eye's sake.

Um, but you just listen for how frustrated and how like agitated. She sounds with Alex Jones. You said you pulled down the text, did the service function for Sandy hook? That's what you said, Mr. Jones. Correct. And I had several, several different phones with this number, but I did. Yeah, well, of course. I mean, that's why you got it.

No, Mr. Jones. That's not why I have my lawyer sent it to you. But I'm hiding it. Okay. Mr. Jones, Mr. Jones, that just answer questions. There's no question, Mr. Bankson also only asks questions. Sure. Mr. Jones, in discovery, you were asked, do you have Sandy hook, text messages on your phone? And you

said that under oath, cause you not didn't you. I, if I was mistaken, I was mistaken, but you, you got the messages right there. You know what perjury is, right. I just wanna make sure, you know, before we go any further, you know what it is? Yes, I do. I mean, I, I'm not a tech guy. I told you, I gave in my testimony, the phone to the lawyers before, whatever.

And, and so you've got my phone, but we didn't give it to you now, Mr. Jones, one more time. And please remember if you need to assert fifth amendment, you can, I need to know that you can do that, but you testified, so you did. He goes on to say, if you need to assert the fifth amendment, you can, like the other team's lawyer is telling him, maybe you should be quiet at this point is hilarious.

Like how many times has that happened in court? Like, Hey, if you don't wanna go to jail for perjury, maybe just maybe just sit this one out. Maybe just say you don't know  so again, I, I find this to be interesting. I, I think that it's, uh, what a horrible position to find yourself in. I, if you're in any courtroom at all the actual other team's lawyer and what is he gonna do with this?

Right. I mean, I'm, I don't know what type of, you know, there is client attorney privilege and there's, this does raise questions about whether or not Alex Jones gets some ability to say that there's like some type of mistrial, but I guess, because it's a civil case and not a. You know, some type of, um, actual, what is it called?

I don't know, whatever the other type of case, it's a civil case. So the actual ability to, uh, call it a mistrial or whatever, doesn't actually come into play here. Uh, so interesting. But he may be actually able to go after this lawyer, from what I understand for doing that, because he literally just killed his entire case, right?

The, the lawyer has a responsibility to do his best to defend him regardless of the situation. And part of that probably does not have to do with sending the other team's lawyer.  every text message you ever sent ever.  over the last two years. Um, so unfortunate for Alex Jones. Uh, it'll be interesting to see what comes of that trial.

You know, who see, who, who knows how much money they'll actually get out of him for that. It seems like, you know, just looking at the. Uh, the judge in that case, Alex Jones is gonna lose . So it'll be interesting to see how much money actually comes of that for those parents. But I don't know something to watch.

It's I, I bet you, it's probably the most entertaining trial. Uh, Alex Jones is far more, well, you call him what you want, but he is far more entertaining than any of the other trials that we've seen, whether it's Kyle written house, whether it is, uh, you know, um, pirates of the Caribbean trial, that's been going on Amber herd and Johnny Depp, you know, but Alex Jones is far more entertaining, so at least, you know, gives us some good comedy.

All right. Now on the backs of that, we are going to start discussing the Nancy Pelosi, China, America. Situation. But before I do that, the first thing I need you to do is go ahead and hit that subscribe button for me. Um, if you have not already, I would appreciate it. So, so much more than, you know, whether you're driving, sitting at home with your house, with headphones on cleaning, whatever the hell you're doing, there's nothing else that you could do at this very, very moment to get a sliver sliver of good karma.

And you can do that right now by just tap, tap, tap that subscribe button. It would mean the world. To me, it takes two seconds on your end. And then the next thing I needed to do is just go ahead and leave a five star review. Um, again, I would appreciate it so much, write something, you know, whatever was the favorite part of this episode, whatever is your, you know, your favorite episode, whatever it is, leave a five star review.

Again, it helps me get up in those rankings. I spent a ton of time on this podcast. This is not my full-time career just yet. Um, as we discussed last week, I've been working on the website and stuff and, and hopefully we'll get to a point where, um, you guys can help support me in a way that it can be. So I can put out a ton more content, start writing a ton, more articles and stuff, but what you can do at this very moment hit that subscribe button, hit that five star review button. head over to red pill revolution, doac.com and you'll get the full podcast companion. I'll include all of the articles, all of the videos, all of the topic, videos, all of everything that I got from this episode, you will get directly to your email, including the full audio podcast, including the full video podcast, right to your email every single week for free for now red pill revolution, dots.com.

Um, follow me on Instagram, TikTok, you know, every single social platform it's at red pill revolt. Um, make sure if you're on Instagram, you hit the notification button. Otherwise you'll never see my stuff shadow band into oblivion after 50,000 followers. And that's all I got for now. The website is red pill, revolution dot C.

o.com is for losers. So head over to red pill, revolution.co. Right now, you'll see the new website. I just started working on it. Um, tell me what you think it might be great. It might not be so  you tell me, and then, uh, shortly there's gonna be some ways that you can support me on there. So again, I appreciate it so much.

Check out the website, subscribe five star review. That's all I got. Thank you very much.

All right now. What we're gonna be discussing is Nancy Pelosi throwing the very first punch in what could cause a domino effect into a potential world war. As we saw her go on a trip to Taiwan this week, over the last couple of days, she was in Taiwan taking 90 million of taxpayer money to be escorted with unbelievable military presence to get there.

Now, the reason that she went was obscure, she wouldn't tell people why she was actually going to Taiwan, but. Some people have some theories and I have my own, and we will discuss those as well. But let me go ahead and read this article for you, because it will give us some context. We'll look at some of the timelines of what actually went on here.

Uh, and I, and I think it's important to note what's gonna be happening moving forward, because basically where we're at now is that the us is going to keep Naval assets really close to Taiwan. As China begins to ramp up their own Naval deployments and military actions and exercises, which I, I think is like, kind of weird, right?

Like what is an, what is a military exer like live fire drills? What's that doing? I don't know. Um, but let's go ahead and we'll read this article and see what they have to say about Nancy Pelosi. Um, so what it goes on to say is that Nancy Pelosi went to Taiwan. In high ranking, Chinese officials issues, a new threat over Pelosi's expected visit to Taiwan.

That was the very first article surrounding it. The next one goes on to say that that Taiwan is going to be keeping their military, or I'm sorry, their military assets, uh, in ready formation as this situation unfolds. So when she went to Taiwan, there's, there's a few different situations surrounding this.

We'll look at what the white house has to say about it. Well, look what Nancy Pelosi's own Twitter account has to say about it, which is completely contradictory. Uh, but, um, it goes on to say that according to the us Navy, the us Ronald Reagan, USS anti M USS Higgins, USS triple E, and a guided missile cruiser are in the vicinity of Taiwan and overstaying.

After her movement reports also indicate that the two us Naval submarines are also operating in this area. And so it says the movement of war us warships to the east of Taiwan comes as China announced it was moving Naval assets near Taiwan ahead of targeted military drills and missile tests. In addition to various Naval war movements, two Chinese aircraft carriers left their port as speaker Pelosi arrived in Taiwan.

The two aircraft carriers, uh, are expected to move towards the region. The ships are accompanied by type 0 75 amphibious assault ships. All right. So basically what that's saying is that the us is not going anywhere right now, right? The us is going to stand their ground in Taiwan, which is also contradictory basically to what, uh, the white house said, which will watch again here.

Some of the situations that unfolded there and what the white house speaker actually, you know, had to say about it. Um, but China is going to begin a set of unprecedented live fire drills off of the Taiwan coast as a result of this. Okay. It goes on to say that this is from, this is from the guardian. It says China is to begin a series of unprecedented live fire drills that would effectively blockade the islands of Taiwan just hours after the departure of us house speaker Nancy Pelosi, whose controversial visit this week has sparked fears of a crisis in the Taiwan.

Straight Taiwan is characterized the drills, which will last until Sunday afternoon and will include missile tests and other military operations as close as nine miles to Taiwan's coastline. As a violation of international law ahead of the drill, it says 27 Chinese war planes had enter its air defense zone.

Pelosi arrived in Taipei on Tuesday night, under intense global scrutiny and was met by the foreign minister and the us representatives in Taiwan.  she addressed Taiwan's parliament on Wednesday before having public and private meetings with the president, our delegation came to Taiwan to make unequivocally clear.

We will not abandon Taiwan. And we are proud of our enduring friendship. Pelosi said, which again goes completely against what the Weis house had to say about this with their one China policy and believing that Taiwan is its own, you know, sovereign nation. No, , that's what the white house said. They believe that, you know, basically that it's a part of China, which is what we'll see here in this video.

So let's go ahead and see what. The white house had to say about this. We'll see what the text messages were said by Nancy Pelosi. And actually let's go right into that here, which is Nancy Pelosi's tweets, not text messages, sorry.  Nancy Pelosi's tweets. So Nancy Pelosi tweeted by traveling to Taiwan. We honor our commitment to democracy, reaffirming that the freedoms of Taiwan and all democracies must be respected.

And that was directly from Nancy Pelosi's Twitter account. During this now Nancy Pelosi actually posted what seemed to be a hype video around her, her trip to Taiwan, which I feel is hilarious. Even like, listen to the music of this. And I'll kind of talk you through it if you're just listening here. Um, and then we will walk through the article together.

So you hear this uplifting music as they show her landing and walking next to some Taiwanese people. She's speaking on a couch, waving her fist around as people wave their heads as a, in a yes. Motion.

just like the music kills me on this. You know, just how, how, you know, she went to stock media.com and typed in make people like me. So I guess you could receive some type of honor as a result of this, you know, that hasn't been given to other people. Um, I don't know. It's, it's really quite interesting to just, you gotta see this video, go to Nancy Pelosi's Twitter account.

It's hill Larry to see just the, the vibe and the feel of this video here.

They're taking selfies together.

Oh, the good thing she's wearing a mask. She might start a world war, but Nancy Pelosi is at least wearing a mask in her hype video who cares about the, the fighter jet scrambled to run after her. At least she has her mask on

Oh, it's so funny to see the world politics on this stage. It's like, I'm surprised this woman even wants to travel to Taiwan at this point. Um, I don't know. So let let's go over the timeline here. We'll, we'll look at something here, which, you know, in a minute, what we'll look at is the difference between the way the media has addressed.

You know, the headlines that have come out of this for Nancy Pelosi doing this, you know, very, um, what people say about it is somewhat aggressive act, uh, uh, and foreign policy against some of the things that we have said we would follow in the past, including our own white house. I don't know what this, this guy is not the curly headed lady, but the man, um, I don't know what his title is, but he says some, some stuff about what the us policy is about this, and it goes completely against it.

But let's look at the timeline here of what actually went down, what actually happened and see how China responded. Let's just jump into it. So it says. Footage uploaded by civilians in China. So this was breaking news is they started to show China, basically throwing a bunch of military assets on the border of Taiwan, right?

The immediately close vicinity of a city directly across from Taiwan. And it says that footage uploaded by civilians in China show, large military movements of troops and equipment. And speaker Pelosi is expected to arrive in Taiwan shortly. The large military movements have occurred on major highways and railways throughout the Chinese Providence of Fujian.

Um, this was at 1:01 AM Pacific time and it says commercial fights have been abruptly canceled from airports in several cities, um, in the Fujian Providence. And this was, uh, due to regional traffic control and did not elaborate further for the actual cause of that 1 0 7. Um, the mayor of Ziman, I don't know if I'm pronouncing any of these cities, right?

So my apologies has called on citizens to donate blood without detailing. Why at one 11 Pacific time photos coming in the military movements. One 14, the Chinese aircraft carrier is reportedly moving towards Taiwan in additional ship in Chan. Don was reported to have left Sanya Naval base on yesterday.

1 21. They continue to talk about the USS Ronald Reagan is on course towards Taiwan reports, estimated that the shift could arrive in Taiwan in the next six hours. And then we start to see us military aircraft departing Japan and heading towards Taiwan from, uh, air force based. OK, Okinawa, um, 1 37. You start to basically what ends up happening here is a bunch of military aircraft, a bunch of tanks, a bunch of all this military equipment is being shown as traveling all across China, to get over to the streets of Z to show Chinese, uh, military equipment.

There's all these videos of all these people we're posting about it now. It started to say how Nancy Pelosi is gonna basically take a long way around to get there. You know, obviously because she understands what she is doing. And again, we'll talk about why people think she's actually doing what she's doing, which has to do with more.

So her stock investments, as opposed to, you know, maybe us foreign policy, as we see the white house distance themselves from her. And, uh, let's go see. So at 4:57 AM Pacific time, that's 7:57 AM the morning of this happening. Multiple Taiwanese government websites went down, right? All they got shut down, which included the actual taiwan.gov website.

So. From there, we start to see her travel. Now, if you were following this at all, you'd understand that there there's something called the flight radar 20 four.com, which is where you can follow military aircraft follow any type of aircraft that has any type of radar system that you can track through air traffic control.

And there was over 300,000 people following this single plane of Nancy Pelosi, just praying to see it.  go down. You know, we've seen all of these, you know, hilarious comments about this. You know, people are just saying like, you know, just keep her, we don't, we don't want her anyways, if you want to, you know, shoot her down.

Oh, no, we're so sad about it.  uh, I'll, I'll hold my opinion on it. Um, but there was some pretty hilarious comments. If you start to look at these things, um, but everybody was watching this 300,000 people across the world were watching her plane. I imagine be sitting in that aircraft and, and wondering what's gonna actually happen.

I don't know it, it would be if you're Nancy Pelosi and you're all dressed up in your suit and ready to go take on, you know, Taiwan foreign policy or show your support for them. And you're just wondering if at any moment your aircraft could be shut down. Now I would wonder, you know, why they wouldn't turn off their radar.

Um, so you know, what is more likely to me is that that was probably some type of, you know, if they're spending 90 million for her to be there, they're probably sending a couple planes and making one as a decoy. Um, but imagine being the, the pilot on that plane too, like, you didn't even ask for this, right?

You're not going to check on your billion dollar stock investments in Taiwan. You're just flying planes, wherever your command tells you to fly them.  and all of a sudden you have to fly Nancy Pelosi through enemy territory to Taiwan. Wondering if at any moment you're gonna get shot down. For Nancy Pelosi to go check on her stock investments.

Which again, we'll talk about here in a minute.  at 7:01 AM. China closed the Taiwan straight for commercial air tra air traffic control. Um, and then they started to scramble, uh, 7 21, which was 20 minutes later. Taiwan started to scramble fighter jets to intercept Chinese or, uh, aircraft heading towards the country.

All right. Now, Nancy Pelosi later released a state.  and, uh, this beautiful picture of her with her hands up, you know, if you recall her rubbing her fist together and just so excited to clap for Joe Biden, um, but it kind of look like one of those situations, she's quite the awkward character. Um, it says our congressional delegations visit to Taiwan honors America's unwavering commitment to support Taiwan's vibrant democracy.

Our visit is a part of broader trip to the end of Pacific, including Singapore, Malaysia, South Korea, and Japan focused on mutual security, economic partnership, and democratic governance. Our discussions with Taiwan leadership will focus on reaffirming our support for our partner and our, and on promoting our shared interests.

It's interesting that she calls them her partner. Our partner, right? Our partner.  not, not the United States partner. All of, all of ours, uh, all of our partners, um, which again, the white house begins to distance themselves from her as a result of this. Uh, but it says our discussions with Taiwan leadership will focus on reaffirming our support for our partner in on promoting our shared interest, including advancing free and open endo Pacific region.

Uh, America's solidarity with the 23 million people of Taiwan is more important today than ever as the world faces a choice between autocracy and democracy. Our visit is one of several congressional delegations to Taiwan in no way, contradicts longstanding United States policy guided by Taiwan relations active 1979, us China joint and the six assurances.

The United States continues to oppose unilateral efforts to change the status quo. Now things started to escalate here and what we've seen as a result of all of this, uh, you know, basically the very next, you know, several, several hours later, the China's military started to announce that it was going to launch targeted military operations to counter speaker Pelosi's visits, Taiwan, the military added it would resolutely, defend territorial integrity and national sovereignty.

And they didn't say where they were aiming that at. They didn't say specifically in Taiwan, they didn't know anything specific about it just said that they're willing and able to conduct targeted military operations. Now they go on to seemingly say that they're going to be doing live fire drills. And again, this is my question is like, what does a live fire drill?

What does that look like? Why would you, how does that, are you just like flexing your muscles before a fist fight? Like what, what is the point of that? Right? They showed the actual tra air traffic zones, like the, the fight areas that are gonna be sectioned off as a result of this. But who knows what's gonna come of this?

I think this is the very beginning of what's gonna escalate. Uh, I, I just don't see that this saber rattling doesn't turn into something more, but we will see here in just a moment, you know, very shortly, just a few minutes here, we'll see how the white house responds to this, including what, uh, Pentagon press secretary John Kirby said about it.

Um, China summon the us ambassador in China over speakers, uh, visit to Taiwan. China says it will carry out targeted military operations in response to the visit. And then the Pentagon press secretary John Kirby says that speaker Pelosi has a right to visit Taiwan. He adds that the United States believes China will ramp up military activity around Taiwan in the coming days.

And then also said that they support the one China policy and will continue to support speaker Pelosi's trip. They basically say that like, yeah, she can do whatever she. Okay then let her do it. If she wants to go to Taiwan to check on her investment portfolio with microchips, then maybe she shouldn't be using $90 million of taxpayer money to do so.

Maybe she should fly Delta.  like, see if the Delta airliner gets shot down, not a, you know, billion dollar, uh, you know, F 35 as a result of a dog fight that that came of this. So let's go ahead and watch this video. And then we'll talk about some of the, the preceding statements by the people in China, as well as the United States.

But here is the Pentagon press, secretary, John Kirby, and his statements regarding this trip now on Taiwan. Cause I know that's on, uh, everybody's mind today. I wanna reaffirm that the speaker has not confirmed any travel plans and it is for the speaker to do so. And her staff. So we won't be commenting or speculating about, um, the, the stops on her trip.

We have been clear from the very beginning that she will make her own decisions. And that Congress is an independent branch of government. Our constitution embeds a separation of powers. This is well known to the PRC, given our more than four decades of diplomatic relations, the speaker has the right to visit Taiwan and a speaker of the house has visited Taiwan before, without incident, as have many members of Congress, including this year, the world has seen the United States government be very clear that nothing has changed.

Nothing has changed about our one China policy, which is of course guided by the Taiwan relations act. The three joint us PRC communicates in the six assurances. We have said, we have repeatedly said that we oppose any unilateral changes to the status quo. From either side, we have said that we do not support Taiwan, independence.

And we have said that we expect cross straight differences to be resolved by peaceful needs. We have communicated this directly to the PRC at the highest levels. If you don't support Taiwan independence, then why is the speaker of the house going on to Twitter, supporting Taiwan independence? I just don't get how we can have such a disconnect between the third, second, third in line for the presidency.

If Joe Biden dies tomorrow of old age COVID cancer or falls up the stairs, walking to get onto his plane, who's gonna take the presidency. Well, it's Kamala Harris and then it's Nancy Pelosi, who, again, we might have to worry about dying of old age at the same time, but if she's going on to these world stages and she is showing on Twitter, literally on Twitter.

Saying that she supports Taiwan's democracy. We will have to choose between an and a democracy. We are showing our support of the democratic state. She's literally saying that she supports Taiwan's independence in almost every tweet that she talked about on this. And then he comes out here and, and it's all has to do with this gaslighting.

Right? And he, you know, they've been gaslighting the American people for three years, and now they believe that they can not only Gaslight the people, they can Gaslight the Chinese government into thinking that, you know, we're not, we're not doing anything over here. We, we have nothing to do with our third in line for the president of the United States, making a direct attempt at threatening the sovereignty of a, some nation.

You believe to be yours. It's it's it's I don't even know what to describe it as, but it's almost. As insulted as I feel when they Gaslight me, the Chinese government has to be like, yeah, what are you saying? I'm looking at Twitter right now. And Nancy Pelosi is saying that she supports the democracy of Taiwan.

How do we misconstrue this? Because this man is 700 positions below Nancy Pelosi. He is not even close to this. And by the way, what the hell are these positions? Like the press secretary, the Pentagon press sec, the white house, press secretary, the Pentagon press. Secretary. What is this position for? What is this man doing besides literally getting paid to lie?

About everything and read from a book, like how, how do you even get do for when you go through the interview process to be a press secretary, do they make you read Dr. Seuss allowed to people and see how convincing you can read Dr. Like, what is the process to become in this position? How much money do they get paid to literally just stand up there, sift through pieces of paper and lie about every single thing that they're talking about at all times.

I don't know. It just seems like such a ridiculous position. Why don't you have the president of the United States speak to us? Oh, because then you'd have to find somebody and put somebody in that position who has the ability to form sentences. Right. That might be a problem anyways. So let's, let's watch the rest of this, but again, how I, I just don't see how you can have such conflicting conversations surrounding this.

How, how the, the Pentagon press secretary can come out and say that we support the one China policy. We believe Taiwan is a part of China. And at the same time, the third, second, third in line for the presidency is going to Taiwan and saying she supports their democracy. I don't know,

including as recently as last week and the phone call between president Biden and president she, the national security advisor, the secretaries of state and defense, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff have also made this very clear to Beijing in a half a dozen recent high level conversations put simply there is no reason.

For Beijing to turn a potential visit consistent with longstanding us policy into some sort of crisis or conflict, or use it as a pretext to increase aggressive military activity in or around the Taiwan straight.

There's no reason to turn this into anything. There's no reason at all. That's why we sent 26 F 30 fives. I'm making that up. However many fighter jets they sent surrounding her aircraft. However many huge ass military assets, $90 million of taxpayer money is what was expected to come of this trip to ensure her security so that she could go again.

And again, we'll look at this article, but check on her stock investments, 90 million, if you believe. It's just so baffling to me that they can even say that. Why, why, why do you guys have a problem with this what's wrong? We didn't do anything. We didn't do anything. It's like a six year old with a cookie in their mouth telling, you know, telling you they didn't grab the cookie off the counter.

Right. And they got chocolate all over their face. Why are you up so upset? We didn't eat the cookie. It's so stupid. And yet over the weekend, even before speaker Pelosi arrived in the region, China conducted a live fire exercise. China appears to be positioning itself to potentially take further steps in the coming days.

and perhaps over longer time horizons. Now, these potential steps from China could include military provocations, such as firing missiles in the Taiwan straight or around Taiwan operations that break historical norms such as large scale air entry into Taiwan's air defense identification, zone ages. I think you all know that acronym, air, or Naval activities that cross the median line and military exercises that could be highly publicized.

This could also include actions in the diplomatic and economic space such as further spurious legal claims by Beijing's public assertions last month, or I'm sorry, like Beijing's, uh, public assertions last month at the Taiwan Strait is not an international waterway. Some of these actions would continue concerning trend lines, uh, that we've seen in recent years, but some could be of a different scope and scale.

The last time Beijing fired missiles into the Taiwan Strait was 1995 and 1996. After Beijing reacted provocatively to Taiwan's president's visit, uh, to deliver and address at his Alamo mater. I wanna contrast this now between the United States and China, we and countries around the world, believe escalation serves no one Beijing's actions could have unintended consequences that only serve to increase tensions.

Meanwhile, our actions are not threatening and they break no new ground, nothing about this potential visit potential visit, which oh, by the way, has precedent would change the status quo and the world should reject any PRC effort to use it to do so we will not take the bait or engage in SA rattling. At the same time, we will not be intimidated.

We will keep operating in the seas and the skies of the Western Pacific as we have for decades. We will continue to support cross straight peace, stability, support, Taiwan of course, defend a free and open endo Pacific. And we're still gonna seek to maintain lines of communication with Beijing. All of that is important.

And all of that, all of it is preserving the status quo. We expect to see Beijing continue to use inflammatory rhetoric and disinformation in the coming days. United States by contrast will with transparency will. I am absolutely 100% positive. The United States will act with transparency as always as shown over the last three years.

oh man. Gosh, this man, at least he's better than, uh, the other woman, the white house, press secretary at convincing people and holding a straight face and being able to finish a sentence. You know, at least it's not as insulting when this man lies to our face. I don't know it. It's it's funny. We're gonna read through all of the tweets that Nancy Pelosi had here.

I have him pulled up, so we got 20 seconds left in this. I'll I'll give you the rest of the clip here and then we'll, we'll walk through those end up here. We'll answer your questions. We'll give you the facts. We are also committed to keeping open lines of communication with Beijing. As I said, this is what the world expects of, not just the United States, but of China.

And we encourage Beijing to keep that commitment as well. One of the main things that he said there was that we continue to support the one China policy, right? The one China policy is the fact that China believes that they own Taiwan, right? That's the major overlying theme of the one China policy. Now, as Nancy Pelosi says on the backs of that, and the very first tweet that we see about this, well, maybe the second one, she says the United States  the United States continues to oppose unilateral efforts to change the status quo.

Our visits is one of several congressional delegations to Taiwan and it in no way contradicts longstanding United States policy guided by the Taiwan relations act in 1979, she goes on to say that our delegations visit to Taiwan honors America's unwavering commitment to supporting Taiwan's vibrant democracy.

Our discussions with Taiwan leadership reaffirm our support for our partner and promote our shared interest, including advancing a free and open Indo-Pacific region. Her very next, uh, tweet says by traveling to Taiwan, we honor our commitment to democracy. If you recall, China is not a democracy reaffirming that their freedoms of Taiwan and all democracies must be respected.

The next tweet says our visit reiterates that America stands with Taiwan, a robust, vibrant democracy in our important partner in the endo Pacific. And this, this picture that she's in here outside. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 other people all in masks. And they're all in like black suits and she's in like a pink suit in the middle that like, somebody dressed her in , but they're all in masks, which again, you're outside.

What are you doing? And even if you're inside, what are you doing? The very next post says, I like how she's like following a timeline here. Well, obviously she's not tweeting these. I would be highly, very, very surprised if Nancy Pelosi was actually on Twitter or knew how to use it in her age, but, um, in the recent days.

Yeah. And she kind of moves on from the Taiwan situation. Uh, let's see if she has anymore here. Nope. She moves on. So, um, the last one that she said was, uh, about 17 hours ago and it said our delegation had the distinct privilege of meeting with the president of Taiwan. We discussed how America and Taiwan can deepen our economic ties.

And by that she means her investments in longstanding chip companies.  we discussed how America and Taiwan can deepen our economic ties, further strengthen our security partnerships and defend our shared democratic values. Nancy, how do you plan on defending our shared democratic values? When the Pentagon says that they do not support your trip, that they have nothing to do with your trip, that you are going on this trip alone and they won't tell us why.

And speaking of why let's jump into some of the theories allegedly as to why Nancy Pelosi actually went to Taiwan now to be fully transparent. This is not from any legitimate article, but several people online. Who are going to give their opinions as to why they believe that Nancy Pelosi is actually in Taiwan.

All right. Now, an interesting situation that occurred was recently Nancy Pelosi actually sold, I believe about 50% or her not her. Of course not her. She would never trade stocks with insider information. It was her husband. He has nothing to do with her. They never share information. They don't talk about things that could potentially make them money.

Of course they wouldn't do that. Her husband sold about half of their shares of the Envidia stock. All right. So, um, the first thing that says it's probably something to do with the millions that she just invested into Envidia uh, TSMC is the world's premier provider of Silicon wafer. Their clientele includes apple AMD, Invidia, et cetera.

Invidia's particular in particular just realized they bought too much capacity for TM. TMC S's, uh, process nodes. The crash of crypto is to blame for that. The crash of crypto just saw demand for Nvidia GPS plummet. They ordered way too many chips expecting crypto to stay strong. Now as to why she's going there, TSMC will not change the existing deal for the chips.

With Nvidia. This puts Invidia in a bad position because demand is now low and supply is going to be enormous. She owns a ton of Invidia stock and that stock price will plummet. If supply isn't reduced in some way, she's probably trying to go to Taiwan to get TSMC, to play ball. She could threaten them directly by holding up the chips act in Congress, costing TSMC, billions TSMC is set to receive money in the aforementioned act to subsidize the construction of a silicone fab in Arizona.

It's literally a matter of national security that they build that fab. Otherwise when China sees as Taiwan and they will eventually China will control the best processors on the planet. Uninhibited even Intel is years behind TSM C's design Nancy probably just doesn't wanna lose millions on a bad buy.

And she just is throwing her weight around threatening national security to make a few dollars. No Nancy Pelosi would not, not overcome her integrity would not, would not put her reputation on the line to make money. She makes $200,000 a year as the speaker of the house or something like that. Right?

That's, that's more than enough to, to house herself in a $10 billion house or whatever the house she lives in.  uh, somebody asks on that thread do, should I buy TSMC stock now before China's takeover and somebody responds and says, China's seizing Taiwan as a matter of when. And they will control a good portion of the computer chip supply.

It's one of the easiest annexes in the Asian region, but they won't invade before the us builds its own steady supply of chips because of political fallout, which would last for a duration of half a presidency until the public loses interest in Asians. I didn't say that , um, somebody said that she sold her position in Nvidia.

Somebody responded by saying that she sold less than half of it, still 6.5 million position that she's in right now, which is approximately one 20th, maybe not 1 21 16th, one 17th of the total cost of the military tax hours that were spent for her to ensure her own safety, going to Taiwan in the first place.

Maybe we can cut a deal with Nancy, like, Hey, don't go to Taiwan and start a world war. And maybe let's just, let's give her like a $2 million, you know, check as a result. And then she doesn't have to go play these little games and, and, you know, potentially cause the deaths of tens of millions of people, somebody else went on the same, speaking on the same subject about the chips, which seems to be a theme regarding this visit.

They said that she is going to Taiwan to make a deal about TSMC. TSMC is quite literally a key part of Taiwan's defense strategy. There really isn't much competition with TSMC on the bleeding edge of chip production. And the few people that can compete are still behind them. If they were knocked out of the tech industry would be set back a decade.

At least even if competitors Samsung could speed up their development and create a competing node, TSMC represents a huge percentage of the market that, um, that them going down would absolutely cripple tech markets. The other dominance of TSMC and the complete reliance on TSMC by the global tech industry is why Europe United States and China are all investing so heavily in ship.

Taiwan, isn't stupid. They know they can't stand up to China and they fight TSM. C's dominance is their defense strategy. Taiwan has made the west so helplessly dependent on them and the west can't afford to let China invade. Pelosi is there to make a deal. I have no doubt. She will line her own pockets in the process, but let's not get ourselves here.

Pelosi does not give a shit about the United States. You think she gives a fuck about Taiwan. This person says she will coddle them like the rest of the west until the very moment the us chip fabs can complete can compete and don't need TSMC anymore. The second Taiwan is no longer an integral part of the economy.

You can bet your ass. People like Pelosi. Won't give the AODA of a fuck about them anymore.  that was beautifully written. Thank you so much. Um, Again, somebody else said, should I invest in their stock? What happens if the stock value in China captures Taiwan? Um, somebody else said that it's being kept down by the China threats, providing how stupid ball street is insanely undervalued stock.

Nothing will happen to TSMC. The tech they use comes from ASML in Europe. If they can rebuild it somewhere else, it can be rebuilt somewhere else in the world. The chip act is supposed, uh, supposed to pay for them to build a plant in Texas. Supposedly Taiwan doesn't want to do it because they don't wanna lose their bargaining chip against China.

Interesting. Very interesting. So there you have it. That is the theories behind why Nancy Pelosi is actually going there because she wouldn't tell anybody Nancy Pelosi would not disclose why she was going to Taiwan besides her tweets that make it seem like she's doing it for foreign policy, which is obviously according to most sources and by most sources, I mean, a bunch of random people on the internet  has nothing to do with it.

Um, so take it with a grain of salt, but that's what they're saying. All right now, one thing I do find interesting regarding this whole thing is the difference in the way that they headlines reacted to the, to Nancy Pelosi, going to Taiwan and Donald Trump specifically just taking a phone call from Taiwan's president Nancy Pelosi, literally met with Taiwan's president and Donald Trump took a phone call and got just obliterated for doing so.

So let's read the headlines. It says Nancy Pelosi tells this is both from the same article or from the same writer from the guardian. And it says that Nancy Pelosi tells president Cy us will not abandon Taiwan. That is the statement made by the guardian about her visit. Okay. Now what they said. When Trump specifically.

So if you like recall the way that Trump was treated in the media, it's quite comical to look at the variations compared to that his presidency and no, right. He was just like, you know what I'm saying? It was, it was just the way the media treated him in the headlines was like everything that he did was a national crisis.

Every phone call, literally every phone call he took was an atrocious act of self, you know, uh, self help and, and not for our country, you know, everything he did was horrific. So Nancy Pelosi goes to meet the president and the headline is Nancy Pelosi tells president SI us will not abandon Taiwan. The other headline is that Nancy Pelosi's, Nancy Pelosi pledges us solidarity with Taiwan.

Okay. Those are your two headlines by the guardian for Nancy Pelosi. Okay. Now. The headlines for Donald Trump. When he specifically just took a phone call, all he did was take a phone call, nothing crazy. The headline was Trump's phone call with Taiwan, president risks, China's wrath risks. China's wrath for taking a phone call, not for flying a plane there with a bunch of military assets to protect him along with all of these aircraft carriers and you know, all of these missiles on top of those beautiful carriers and F 30 fives following in pursuit.

And no, none of that just took a phone call. Now let's just read the first little couple sentences here. It says Donald Trump looked to have sparked a potentially damaging diplomatic role with China. On Friday, after speaking to Taiwanese president on the telephone and they move experts, would an expert said would anger Beijing, the call first reported by the TA a times and confirmed by the new financial times is thought to be the first between the leader of the island and us president or president elect since ties between America and Taiwan were severed in 1979 at Beijing's behest.

The us closes embassy in Taiwan, a democratically ruled island, which Beijing, Beijing considers a breakaway Providence in the late 1970s. Following the historic re reapproach between Beijing and Washington, that stemmed from Richard Nixon's 1972 trip to China since then the us adhered to the so-called one China principle, which officially considers the independently governed island part of the same single Chinese nation as the mainland.

Trump's transition team said Cy, who was elected Taiwan's first female president in January had congratulated the billionaire tycoon on his recent victory. So they start to fear monger. They say that it's gonna be against that just for taking a phone call  now Nancy Pelosi goes there. And all of a sudden the guardian believes that she's doing the right thing, right?

that they say that China cannot stop other world leaders. Visiting Taiwan says Nancy Pelosi, right? Singing the praises from the mountain tops. And when Trump takes a phone call, he's dealing with the wrath of China. Wild. All right. And then the last thing that we will talk about here, something that is not in the news, as much as it should be currently is that Paul Pelosi Nancy Pelosi's husband is to be arraigned on DUI charges in Napa county.

Paul Pelosi husband, the speaker of the house, Nancy Pelosi is scheduled to be arraigned at eight 30 on Wednesday today in Napa county superior court. According to a press release from the Napa county district attorney's office, the DA's office filed charges after Pelosi was arrested for allegedly driving under the influence on May 28th, Pelosi was reportedly in a car accident.

The night he was arrested, the charges include driving under the influence of alcohol con causing injury and driving with a zero, uh, 0.08 blood percent blood alcohol level or higher. According to California pen code 1977. Defendants may appear through their attorney for misdemeanor DUI cases, meaning they don't need to be present in the courtroom unless a judicial officer orders.

It Pelosi has not been ordered according to the DA's office at arraignment, a judicial officer nor, uh, notifies the defendant of the crimes they have been charged with. Then a formal reading of the complaint can be waived da LA, then the defendant and their counselor can enter a plea. The case may then be continued to another date after a plea charge.

Is set in the jury trial. Now it's interesting that he even got charged in this case that he's even going to court and that anybody ever found out about it. I would think if you're Nancy Pelosi and you have the ability to get 90 million to be, you know, your, your fleet of vehicles that you get to take with you to show that you're a thug against the Chinese government, that you know, maybe our own government wouldn't go after your husband for a DUI.

Oh, and here's another article showing his mugshot, which is absolutely atrocious. Looks like a, um, methed out author.  it says that mugshot from Paul Pelosi husband, the speaker of the house, Nancy Pelosi has been released at the night of the arrest on suspicion of driving under the influence. Last month, Pelosi was arrested on May 28th by the California highway patrol for driving under the influence of alcohol, um, under the suspicion of D a DUI.

So I've heard people say that maybe this is, you know, some type of. You know, uh, some, some silly people have reported that. I dunno. It's interesting that at the same time, as she's flying millions of dollars of us tax dollars in military assets to Taiwan, her husband's in court over a DUI for running into somebody.

Now, I don't believe this is the first time he's dealt with this. Uh, I've heard, I don't know, maybe I'm wrong, but I've heard that Pelosi's husband has been in this type of trouble before. And he's 82 years old. What are you doing? Getting a DUI at 82.  like, let, like you're getting drunk enough to be over the limit at 82 years old.

And then also driving your vehicle. Like, was he like hanging out with the homies at the local bar? I don't know, but here here's what I think. I, I think we're getting into some really iffy waters with this whole worldwide conflict situation between Ukraine and Russia. Right. We haven't seen as much Saab rattling from Russia recently with the United States, but now China entering the arena.

We've kind of been waiting on this. We've been looking out for this situation. China has now entered the chat, right? China is now Sabre rattling, not just at Taiwan, but at us leadership in governmental officials. So this is where it starts to get iffy. And if China enters the conversation and Russia's pissed off at us, because we were throwing our buddies in Ukraine, all of the missiles we could find to kill their own citizens.

Mm. Things could get squirrly. Right. Uh, again, I've, I've talked about this analogy a bunch, but if you were in a bar and your buddy was in a fight and all of a sudden the guy that he's fighting, his buddy throws him a knife. You're probably gonna throw him a gun. Right. If you have the ability to right.

It's like this weird consequence of events, when you're funding the oppositions. Uh, you know, ability to fight against a world superpower. Eventually they're gonna come for you. Right? And now that we have China and Russia entering into this worldwide global arena at the same time, things are just gonna get weirder and weirder.

So we're gonna have to see where this goes. I'm not super posi. You know, I'm not super, uh, optimistic that this doesn't go in a direction that doesn't have to lead to some sort of war conflict for the first time between world super powers since you know, 1942. Uh, but hopefully that's not the case, but it's definitely a concern right now.

You know, we see all of this weirdness going on, all of the things leading up to this and within a year of presidency, not only does Russia, Ukraine, Russia invade Ukraine, and China's saber raddling at Nancy Pelosi, visiting Taiwan. Again, we're gonna have to see where it goes, but it it's, it's, it's quite concerning.

And that's what I got for you today. I hope they gave you an update on Nancy Pelosi. Now, one thing that I would like to do in the future, I'm going to get back to some deep dives. I'm going to get away from all of the political rhetoric that we've been talking about over the last several episodes. We'll include some of the recent events and things like that.

But I am going to get back to our roots, which is talking about.  all of the craziness that is going on behind the curtain. Right. I think the next episode, or at least in the very new future, I would like to talk about some of the, the food aspects. Right? You see all of the bugs, they're trying to get you to eat.

you see, um, you know, all of this things about seed oils coming out and all of the things that are government in our, you know, uh, worldwide, um, multinational corporations are pushing on us as a, a culture. You see bill gates buying all the farmland, you see China buying all the farmland, you see all of these fad diets coming into play, and, and that have all of these, you know, chemicals and grossness involved.

And then in the very near future, we're gonna start bringing on some guests. I'm gonna start doing some interviews with people that I find interesting on topics that I find to be interesting. Um, so head over to red pill, revolution.co. Check out the website. Let me know what you think. Head over to red pill revolution, doac.com.

You'll get the full podcast companion, which I guess I should have mentioned earlier. Um, but head over to red pill revolution, doac.com and you'll get the full podcast companion. I'll include all of the articles, all of the videos, all of the topic, videos, all of everything that I got from this episode, you will get directly to your email, including the full audio podcast, including the full video podcast, right to your email every single week for free for now red pill revolution, dots.com.

Subscribe, leave a five star review. I appreciate you so much. I hope you have a great week and welcome to the revolution. Thank you so much.

On this week's episode we discussed Elon Musk denied having an affair with the wife of Google co-founder, Sergey Brin, Jim Harbaugh's offer to his students, and the upcoming climate crisis being the new pandemic as a leaked conversation with CNN Executive exposed. We also discuss the death of the freedom of speech via AI algorithms and the white towel seemingly being waved by our politicians. Lastly, we discuss the recent mass shootings and the fact that hero still exists in a world where there seems to be plenty of villains. 

Subscribe and leave a 5-star review!

----more----

Welcome to the revolution.

 Hello and welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams, and today is episode number 37 37 of the red pill revolution podcast. And I appreciate you listening so much. We have a very interesting episode today. Got some pretty, uh, intriguing topics today that we're gonna discuss, including Elon Musk denying an affair with Google's co-founder Serge Brins wife.

 that's one we'll touch on. We're also going to talk about, uh, the Highland park shooter being indicted by a grand jury on over a hundred well, 117 total charges. Um, Jim Harborough. From the university of Michigan, shout out to Jim har har Harba Harba yeah, something like that anyways, so that he was willing to raise his or his, uh, players' babies.

Um, basically telling them that they, he said, don't get an abortion. I will raise your children for you. We're also going to discuss the world's first named heat wave. Hmm. We've been talking about this for the last several episodes where there's been this humongous, humongous push recently through the mainstream media to, I don't know.

And sensationalize, you know, heat  as a, as a, as the next killer pandemic. Uh, so find that interesting. Um, so we'll discuss that, read about that article, see where, um, what the actual name of that heat wave is going to be. Uh, we're also going to discuss a update as the Biden administration offers to exchange Britney Griner and Paul Whelan for release of Russian arms dealer.

That doesn't sound right. Offers to exchange. Yeah. So two people for one, they want to exchange a Russian arms dealer for a w N B a basketball player who got caught with M. I dunno, find that one. Interesting, but all of that to more all of that, to more all of that and more, uh, on today's show. So stick around, I appreciate you so much.

And if you're wondering if you're watching this, why I have this white little, I don't know, eye patch over my eye today, I look like a mix of Nellie and Rocky Balboa. Um,  I will, I'm happy to tell you, so stick around and we'll talk about that too. Um, welcome to the Revolut.

Welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams. Red pill revolution started out with me realizing everything that I knew, everything that I believed, everything I interpreted about my life is through the lens of the information I was spoon fed as a child, religion, politics, history, conspiracies, Hollywood medicine, money, food, all of it, everything we know was tactfully written to influence your decisions and your view on reality by those in power.

Now I'm on a mission, a mission to retrain and reeducate myself to find the true reality of what is behind that curtain. And I'm taking your ass with me. Welcome to the revolution.

All right, let's get. Into it. All right. So the very first thing that we're gonna discuss today, oh, I have a couple other topics, uh, that are gonna be discussed today, including Kamala Harris's conversation about her, uh, blue suit  and so hilarious. Um, so we'll, we'll also discuss that. All right. Um, so thank you again so much for listening.

If you could go ahead and hit that subscribe button, it takes, I don't know, three seconds of your time. And it means the world to me, you have, you know, so many different ways that you can get good karma, but you know what? You didn't get it so far today. You've done nothing to deserve it. And now you can get that good karma just by pressing the button for me hit that subscribe button right now.

And again, it would mean the world for me, leave a five star review that helps me get pushed up in the rankings and, uh, that on the back of the fact that I'm literally censored on every damn social media channel that exists. Um, shadow band censored band, you name it. I got it. Um, cannot tell you how frustrated I am with this recently.

Uh, just got, uh, banned for a full week on TikTok because I posted the video about last week's discussion about hunter Biden. Um, basically getting in trouble by his own family members for being inappropriate with his niece, Natalie. Um, so I posted the video to basically just reading some of the information about that reading, um, some of the texts which were not graphic whatsoever, um, and somehow managed to get myself banned for putting negative connotations around a pedo.

Hmm. So right now I have very little platforms, if any, to get the word out and I need you guys to help me out. All right. What I need you to do is if you do see my stuff on Instagram, or if you don't see my stuff on Instagram, go ahead over to my Instagram. You can search it right at the top of the Instagram search bar.

And you need to put in the full name. It's red pill. Revolt is the username you have to put in the full thing. They will shadow ban me until you put it in and press the enter button. And then you will see my account with more than 49,000 followers on there, but you can't see it until you press the whole damn thing in there.

You'll probably even see my backup before you even see that, which just has two Ts. Um, but head over there. And it, it would really, I mean, the only, literally the only way I have right now to get the word out on these things, to speak, you know, up in these times of craziness, where somebody gets shadow banned for discussing a president's son, who's being accused of being inappropriate with his family young.

Underage family members. I get censored for that, right? So I need you guys to help me out, share my stuff, post it on your story. You know, re-share my videos. Um, you know, do whatever you can to help me get the word out about this. I would appreciate it more than you'd ever know. You know, this is something that I would love, love, love to do as my full-time career.

And I was looking to do that by the end of this year and on the trajectory that I was on. And just a few months into this, um, was absolutely doable. I got like 50,000 followers in my first five months, and then that got shadow banned into oblivion by Instagram and it killed all of my traction, killed all of my growth.

I've literally lost. 3% of my followers have gained zero. Um, over the last 90 days, um, going on five months now, since that happened. So, um, again, just a few ways that you can help me out if you head over to that page, hit the notification button at the top, right. You can hit the three little, um, three little dots at the top, right.

And, uh, turn on your notifications for the red pill revolt, uh, Instagram page. And that would mean a lot to me. Um, and just share my shit. I appreciate it. Like I said, but the very first thing that we're gonna jump into today is going to be Elon Musk denying his affair with Google co-founder Serge Brin's wife.

Okay. So Elon Musk denying his affair with the Google co-founder's wife. Um, and we'll discuss this because it, it seems to be like, you know, Elon Musk is shouting disinformation  whereas the Google executive, I'm pretty sure basically. Divorced his wife over this. So if Elon Musk is just, you know, or if they're going after Elon Musk, this guy's pretty committed to doing so by divorcing, like actually legitimately divorcing his wife over this , but it goes on to say that TE's, uh, Tesla boss, Elon Musk has denied having an affair with Nicole Shanahan, the wife of Google co-founder Serge Brin must comments came after the wall street journal reported that his friendship with Mr.

Brin had ended over the alleged affair, replying to a link to the story posted on Twitter. Must refer to the report as total BS. Musk went on to say that he is still friends with Mr. Brin and that they were at a party together last night. Hmm.  citing people familiar with the matter the wall street journal said that Musk has, was engaged in a brief affair last year with Ms.

Shaham. This prompted Mr. Brin to file for divorce earlier this year, over this and ended the long friendship between the two high profile technology billionaires. The paper also went on to say, but must tweet it. I've only seen Nicole twice in three years, both times with many people around and nothing romantic.

His tweet said verbatim. Um, this is total BS, Serge, and I are friends. And we're at a party together last night. I've seen Nicole twice in three years, both times with many other people around, nothing romantic at the time of the alleged affair in December Mr. Brennan and his wife were separated, but still living together.

The wall street journal said citing a person close to miss Shanahan. Then cite them. What, in this separate tweet, Mr. Musk said the wall street journal has run so many BS, hit pieces on me in Tesla. I've lost count even though they have PR uh, even though they have a prenuptial agreement, Mr. BN and miss Shaham are currently negotiating a divorce settlement, which could be as much as $1 billion.

uh, Mrs. Shanahan is a California based attorney and founder of legal technology company, clear access IP and the bio echo foundation. Uh, according to her LinkedIn profile, the BA echo foundation is a philanthropy organization that promotes reproductive, longevity, inequality, criminal justice reform, and a healthy livable planet.

Wow. That is the most vague thing ever. Sounds like money laundering to me.  Mr. Musk, who is also the boss of rocket firm. SpaceX is also known for how he operates his many companies, but is also attracted press interest in his private life. Um, So this goes on to show a few other recent articles put out about Musk just in the last three months.

And it does seem like there's been several, several hit pieces on Elon Musk over the last 90 days or so leading up to the Twitter buyout. All right. So let's just read through some of these articles, which says that, uh, let's just read on down. What are the Elon Musk headers from this? Uh, the, the news company that I'm looking at here is BBC.

All right. The, the first one is Twitter spent 33,000,003 months on must deal. Tesla sells most of its Bitcoin holdings. That was six days ago. Twitter must dispute heading for October trial, Twitter, sus Elon Musk, over 44 billion takeover deal. None of those are hip pieces must became father of twins. Last year.

Elon must daughter cut ties with her father and Elon must deny sexual misconduct allegations. That was all the way back in may. So. Who knows. I could see Elon being a sneaky little bastard, especially knowing that he was in some type of sexual engagement with Amber herd. If you're willing to do anything with that bat shit crazy lady, then you're probably not above, you know, banging your buddy's wife.

so it is a strong potential that this has actually happened in my opinion. Um, but you. Nothing, nothing, uh, nothing, uh, coming out yet. That gives us one way or another, besides a close, confident informant. Like they, you know, alluded to on there. Uh, but I found that to be interesting. Elon Musk out there doing the dirty, dirty deeds against his own friends, uh, wives  now, um, I guess we'll have to see what comes of that.

If there is any further tweets, um, but time will tell, uh, who knows. Um, I think Elon Musk is probably, and she's getting a billion dollars, right? If she goes from being with Elon Musk to this Google executive or from this Google executive to Elon Musk, and you get a billion dollars while cheating on your husband and screwing, you know, the world's most rich man  I think, I think you're doing well.

Um, so this sounds like a lose lose for both of the men and a win-win for Mrs. Shanahan. Or miss Shanahan now to clarify,  no longer misses. Um, but sounds like she won right. Elon Musk lost as in this hip story, although maybe he did get some late night shenanigans with the Google co-founder his wife. Um, and the Google co-founder seems to be the loser loser here because he both got cheated on and will lose a billion dollars as a result.

all right. Now the very next thing that we are going to discuss is going to be Jim Harbaugh. Saying that he is willing to raise his players' babies instead of them getting an abortion. All right, now it says that, uh, Jim Harbaugh is fiercely against abortion, says that he'd be willing to raise the baby of any of his university of Michigan football players.

If they had an unplanned pregnancy and the couple decided to have the baby, he went on to say that I've told them the same thing. I tell my kids, boys, the girls, same thing. I tell our players and our staff members. He said that on Saturday, I encourage them to have a pregnancy that wasn't planned to go through with it, go through with it.

He told ESPN, let that unborn child be born. And if at the time you don't feel like you can care for it. You don't have the means. Wherewithal then Sarah and I will take the baby. He said the Wolverines head coach who signed a $36.7 million extension in February was the key note speaker at a recent right to life event.

Hmm. Interesting. I didn't know that about him. Um, I don't happen to be a university of Michigan fan, uh, but a, you know, one of their rivals fans  um, however, uh, I would say that he just went up in my book, right. To know that he's actually at, out, out there, um, you know, boots on the ground and pushing for some of his beliefs, including, you know, not, uh, AB boarding slash killing potential human life during the abortion speech, 58 year old Harba spoke and about having the courage to let the unborn be born as for why he chose to speak out about the controversial topic.

Jim says, while it may be difficult, it's an incredibly important issue for America.  um, now it goes on to say, uh, another quote from him, which is just, I just think the issue of life. I think, I just think this issue of life save the, a life. The abortion issue is one that is so big that it needs to be talked about.

It's a life or death type of issue. And I believe in and respect people's views, but let them discuss it because there's a passion on both sides of the issue. This is on the backs of the row verse Wade decision to be overturned now, um, good on har for doing this right? I would. Absolutely. I love that. I love that, right.

That this man is so willing in. So in his own beliefs about this, that he's willing to take on the responsibility, right. Even of his staff members, not just his own children, not of, you know, his, just his players, which is a pretty audacious, uh, position to hold to begin with. I don't know if that word applies there  but, but then all, not only that, but your staff members too.

So good on Harba for speaking out, speaking up, going to these rallies, um, being a keynote speaker at them, um, just looking through some of the pictures of this conversation that he had here, uh, posted by Detroit Catholic, um, in Plymouth, Michigan in the recent speech. Um, but. Very cool. I love that. I think that's so awesome and, and good on him.

You know, I think there's a, a longer conversation to be had. We've had this conversation several times since then, but, you know, as my position is held, you know, there's definitely some options. One of those options is adoption, right. Or, you know, worst case scenario, foster care. But I don't think if you interviewed any child ever who's ever been birthed ever after not being aborted by their mother and being given up to foster care or via adoption that any of them ever would say that they would rather be dead.

Just my opinion. Um, but good on him. I think that's awesome. You know, there's very little positive headlines being pushed out there today and I'm sure 100% positive that he's going to catch a bunch of shit for this. Um, and he knew that going into it full well. Right. He knew that, but he decided to do that anyways, which I think is just awesome.

All right. Um, so one of the next things we're gonna discuss here is going to be the name of the world's very first heat wave  right now. But before I do that, I need you to do one thing for me, head over right now to red pill, revolution dot sub stack.com. All right. Now, every single week I put out a sub stack podcast, companion newsletter directly to your email.

And what I've been doing with that recently is I've been putting in all of the full episode, the podcast is embedded right there on the email for you. You click it, you can listen to it. It comes out the very next day, generally, um, sometimes a day or two after, but usually I try to put it out the very next day.

Um, I also include the full video podcast directly on there for you embedded again, and then all of the topic clips, every single topic that I discussed broken down into just the very, um, you. Shortest amount of time that I discussed them for you to get exactly what I talked about and have an organized way to get it.

You can get that right now for free, for free. All right. Now, if you would love to support me, you can do that in a couple different ways. All right. The first way you can do it is by signing up as a paid subscriber of the subst stack. It is a free option, but if you have the means to do so, um, I think it's like you can do $7.

You can do, you know, whatever you can choose a custom amount, whatever that means to you or to help support me. Um, I would really appreciate it. Like I said, this is going to be not, I want it to be not, I, I will try to make it be, this is going to be my full-time career eventually. And I would like that to be sooner or later.

And the only way that I can do that right now is if you guys go ahead and sign up for that subst stack as a paid member, Donate directly via the give send go, um, which is give, send, go.com/red pill revolution, or by signing up for life insurance. Um, now I just messed around with the website a little bit, so I will be posting that link back up there.

Um, but you can go to the website, red pill, revolution.coo.com is for losers, red pill, revolution.co. And eventually, probably in the next couple days here, I will have a link for you to go ahead and click on it and get a quote and get yourself some life insurance. And that is the absolute best possible way ever.

You could support the podcast. Um, there's decent, like very decent commissions on life insurance. Um, and you get something out of it too, right? You get some life insurance, you protect yourself, you protect your family. If something bad happens to you and everybody dies eventually. So you might as well not leave your family with a bunch of debt.

So, um, I got like a, was a $2 million policy for 40 or $50 a month or something like that. Um, so head over there right now, get a quote, sign up. That's the best possible way that you can support me. And also if you can't do any of those things, just share my stuff right now. I would appreciate it more than you'd ever know.

All right. That's what I got for that now. Um, the name of the, the world's very first named heat wave and the name is Zo Zo. How anti climactic and they started at Z , so, Hmm. Interesting. Uh, so it says blistering temperatures ranked as a category three, the most severe tier in Seville's Spain's new heat wave system.

Um, the world's first named heat wave hits Seville Spain this week, pushing temperatures past 110 degrees Fahrenheit and earning the most severe tier in the city's new heat wave rink, new heat wave ranking system. Interesting how new this is. Oh, and they're also gonna call it zoo, which has brought scorching temperatures to the Southern part of the country for the last few days, particularly in the region of Vania where Seville is located when in the evenings, the Spanish meteorologist service recorded temperatures that hovered above the mid eighties in some areas and extra stress on the human body, which relies on cooler nights to recover from high daytime.

uh, so this is all just telling you, like there was a recent video that came out from, I think it might have been project Veritas, but it basically, um, caught a CNN executive basically saying that the climate crisis is now going to be the new COVID push that they had. Right. So they they're over the pandemic.

The death numbers are off the side of it. Right. And now the new way that they're going to instill fear in you gets you to lock down your businesses, take away your rights is going to be through the climate crisis. And now we know it because CNN's executive just said it literally from his mouth while being schmoozed on a date that wasn't really a date.

I find that to be one of the most hilarious parts of the project Veritas stuff is like, not only did you get leaked saying some shit that you probably shouldn't say, not only are you going to probably lose your job for doing so and get ridiculed by everybody you've ever known in your professional career, but you also now know that that probably pretty hot girl that you thought you were going on.

A date with that was super into you was full of shit. And just having a conversation with you. So she could steal information from you. Like literally like some cagey B spy stuff going on here in, uh, I believe it was project Verto it looked like a project Veritas video. Um, I don't know of anybody else who's been doing stuff like that.

So it, it likely has to be, uh, but.  it says that the, the, uh, the worst of the heat is expected to begin tapering off today. It was poised, uh, as it a, it posed a significant risk to human health while last day, according to ProMED Seville. Yeah. Who cares this big, big push by all the mainstream medias. I've talked about it several times over the last several weeks, every new article, the hu thousands of healthy people will die in the UK, right.

Or wherever it was Europe. Um, all of these articles coming out now, CNN coming out and saying that they are literally going to instill fear in you through this. And then they come out with a naming system. For a heat wave. Like they've never done in the history of humans ever. And not only that, but they were dumb enough to start it at Z

So we'll see where that goes. But I, I really do think this is exactly what's happening is they're going to push for a climate lockdown 100%. Right? Everybody knows C's over. Everybody knows besides maybe Fauci, who wants to still try and push fear in you because he's so irrelevant at this point. And nobody cares what he says, but this is their new way of trying to instill fear.

This is their new way of trying to instill totalitarianism. This is their new way of trying to take away your jobs and your. It's just what's gonna happen. And there's, this is like the scariest part about all of this for me is there's like, literally nothing we can do. There's not like, I don't know what, what we can do.

Like protests, maybe like get, gather and get in front of these people. I guess that's the, the OG way of doing it. Right. We gotta get, there's gotta be some type of organization. That's going to put these things together because there's not even a whisper of these things happening right now. Not even a whisper of anybody at all in the United States of America, pushing back against this totalitarianism over the last several years, right there.

Wasn't like even the trucker rally that was supposed to go on, like just drifted off into the winds. Like nothing happened. Nobody heard about it. Nobody talked about it. It didn't help with any change at all. Right. So on the backs of all of this climate crisis, all of this food shortage crisis, which is basically just bill gates in China, buying up all of the farmland in the United States so that they can force you to shove bugs in your mouth.

Like Nicole Kidman. If you saw that video, you, if you haven't seen it, you gotta go watch it. Nicole Kidman, basically. Uh, what does she say? Like 50% of the world are some stupid statistic that she gives eats bugs. Mm. And then she has like a four different types of bugs that she eats. It's like this gross, gross mixture of Hollywood and global elites pushing their like next wave of societal shifts that they're gonna profit trillions off of.

And then, and I think that's an interesting point too, is like, that's the way that when you have billions, when you have hundreds of billions of dollars, you know how you get trillions, you make societal human systemic shift.  right. Like shifting everybody from eating meat, to eating beyond meat, shifting everybody from focusing on, uh, good whole sourced beef to crickets and meal worms and all of this grossness.

Right. It's like, what they've done is they've found ways over the years to take a whole way of human beings, operating systems and shifting it in a direction of something that's profitable for them. Right? Like we saw it with the pandemic, with the vaccine. We saw it with like this hyper inflated sense of fear that they instilled in people to do.

So, um, you know, here's an example of, of, you know, just the, the beyond me is such a good example of it. Bill gates, trying to ma basically shift the whole world from eating literally what was put on this planet for us. To consume just like every human ever has consumed forever. It's not like cow farts. All of a sudden are tearing down the ozone.

Like cows have been around for a very long time. Right. They're not just now, you know, pooping enough to, to blow up the world. Right. It's it's so stupid. And so you see them make these huge societal shifts, right? These huge, you. Concerted efforts to instill fear in the human psyche enough to make you want to spend your money and holy shift over to something new.

And here's an example that I've used before. It's like if bill gates decided that he wanted to take a 500 billion and turn it into $5 trillion, what he could do is he would go and he would lobby and he would push through all of the mainstream media. That water is now toxic. The water you drink is bad for you.

You should stop drinking it because if you continue doing so, you're going to die, everybody's gonna do going to die. And if you don't stop drinking it, your neighbor's gonna hate you. Your friends are gonna hate you. You're gonna be the most hated person in the world. Cuz you're contributing to all these people in the world who are now dying because they're drinking water.

And then after pushing that message for so long, he decides to lobby against all these politicians who are now going to. Gates are raid, right? The brand new water. That's better than the old water. It's like Gatorade, but better. Right? And he's gonna in, he's gonna lobby through all the higher up governmental societal positions and he's going to pay them off.

Like I said, 500 billion gets you pretty far with politicians, pay off all these politicians, right. Pay 'em off. And now eventually you're gonna get these infrastructure bills that are gonna be passed to put in new pipings for gates raid, right? Bill gates, Gatorade  that is taking over water. And then eventually every single person in society is going to point their grubby little finger at you for drinking water.

And now gates took that 500 billion and turned it into 5 trillion because now nobody's drinking water and they're all drinking gates, array . And if bill gates steals that name from me, he owes me some damn royalties, cuz that would, or my idea if he steals my idea or. My name, he has to pay me royalties, calling it right now.

All right, because that's a pretty damn evil plan that I just outlaid for him and a pretty damn good marketing name  for doing so, uh, definitely better than beyond meat, right? It's like, I've seen all of these like vegan, vegetarian people like shoving their BS meat down your throat. Like if you're gonna be a vegetarian, great.

If you're gonna be a carnivore diet, great. Anything is better than the standard American diet. Literally anything is better than the standard American diet, but don't try and tell me that eating meat is horrible for you. And the reason that people die don't try and tell me that eating too many vegetables is that no, it's the standard of American diet is the enemy, which by the way, was pushed on you by the government, right?

Anyways, just a side tangent that this is what they do. They're going to cause these big societal shifts like climate change, like vaccination, like COVID like lockdowns, like, uh, gates array, right beyond me, all of these things that they're gonna eventually try to make these huge societal shifts to turn billions into trillions.

And this is how they're doing it. They're gonna start with the mainstream media pushing these scarce scare tactics on you. Right? They're gonna start putting up counters for all the people who died from heat shock. And then what they're gonna do is just the literal the same exact playbook of COVID is just gonna be implemented for climate crisis climate.

right. The heat waves everybody's dying. And then it's gonna be the, you know, the ice age and all of this crazy fear and stilling stuff then comes the societal shifts. Right? Then they're gonna start pushing and pumping money, which they're already doing into the governmental structures to try and make you stop driving a gas vehicle.

They're going to try to make you stop eating meat. They're going to try to make you stop heating your home with gas. Like all of these things are gonna go away and now they're gonna shift you, even though they didn't need to. They're gonna shift society from one thing to the next, so that they can take an entire industry and plop it back into their wallet and profit trillions off of something that is likely a complete bullshit facade.

Like we saw with the pumping up of numbers of COVID with the ages or the death certificates being shifted at the last minute, like the, you know, the, the literally murdering people like mass murder of people by shoving REM VIR down their throat and not giving them access to ivermectin or to, you know, any of the other holistic, you know, monoclonal antibodies, all of these things that were proven to help that they did not allow, right.

Just like, they're not going to allow you to, they're gonna cause these big shifts, they're gonna buy up all the farmland and they're not going to allow you. They're gonna cause these like scarcity and meat. And eventually they're hoping that everybody goes to either eat beyond meat, which is a 45 ingredient, chemical bullshit or meal worms like Nicole Kidman.

Right. I wonder how much they paid her for that.  I'm sure it was a fair, fair amount of money to eat bugs, right? If you're Nicole Kidman, are you eating bugs? No, unless you're getting paid a shit ton of money, which I'm sure she was. Now, the next thing that we're going to discuss here is going to be the deal that is going down, that the Biden administration is willing to trade a convicted Russian arms dealer for a w N B player who got caught with a marijuana cartridge.

Hmm, that to me doesn't seem like a fair trade  I don't know. Um, so I find this to be interesting. Let's read this article. It says that the Biden administration has offered to exchange a convicted Russian arms trafficker in order to secure the release of two Americans in Russian custody. After two months of debate, w N B a player Brittany Griner and former us Marine, Paul Whelan may be freed.

If the us offers to release Victor bout, it says that bout is star a starving bout is starving a 25 year prison sentence. That probably should be serving. Who am I reading this from the sun? Yeah, not the, I don't know, decently legitimate kind of sensationalist, but, um, I don't think they're starving a 25 year prison sentence.

The sun, if you need an editor, gimme a shout.  Austin at red pill, revolution.co happy to help bout is serving a 25 year prison sentence in the states after being convicted by a federal court in 2011, for conspiracy to kill us citizens and officials. And we're trading that for a w N B player who got caught with weed, we put substantial, substantial, a substantial proposition on the table weeks ago to facilitate the release that secretary of state Anthony blink, blink added that he plans to speak with Russian foreign minister Serge Lara to bring up the proposal.

It will be the first time the two have spoken since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in late February, Wayland has been held by Russia for a legend espionage since 2018. Russian authorities said Whelan had confidential documents in his hotel room while he was visiting the country to attend his Fred's wedding and was given a 16 year.

Well, in a sense, claimed his arrest was a political stunt, according to ABC news. And he said, the guards call me tourist. He spent 18 months in detention and spent a waiting trial and said that when he was first arrested, he didn't believe it was even happening. How was this a fair sentence? How was this a fair trade at all?

Like, I don't know. I stopped playing Pokemon a long time ago, but I know if bullshit trade, when I see one  we're trading, a convicted Russian arms dealer who is allegedly conspiring to kill Americans for a w N B a player who took weed into the country, doesn't seem all that fair to me. Now, if you go back during Trump's presidency, he I'm pretty sure it was, uh, like little Duval or something.

Right. I'm pretty sure. Uh, he got him released with like literally no. Oh, wait. No, that's that? Not Lil Duval. Lil Duval is a comedian that was recently airlifted to a hospital after a car crash. Um, I don't remember who it was, but Trump basically released a rapper without any negotiations like this without any trades.

He just basically said, Hey, that's mine. Give it back.  and they were like, uh, okay, fine. Right. We're not gonna mess with Donald Trump. What kind of deal is this, what kind of no negotiations is that maybe you should start a little bit lower than murderous Russian arms dealer for w N B a player who smokes weed.

That's I don't see the, and on top of that, they threw somebody else in there. Like it wasn't enough, right? Like, oh, I, no, nevermind. That's wrong. They, they did two for one the opposite way. Okay. So maybe that's better  than what I was thinking. Um, but obviously this isn't a fair trade. It it's crazy to me.

Now, now the most crazy, the most ridiculous part about this is that we are literally negotiating with Russia to release somebody for somebody who we know 100% violated their laws and is rightfully being IM prisons. For something that we currently have people sitting in jail in the United States for today is, is Joe Biden going to start trading?

I don't know, German scientists from the Nazi regime to release, you know, people who are currently in marijuana, in jail for marijuana right now, probably not how many people are sitting in jail right now for marijuana charges in the United States. And we're literally negotiating with Russia with a murderous arms dealer to get one individual out as a publicity son, publicity stunt.

This is 100% of publicity stunt, right. They're just trying to show that they can negotiate. Right. And I would be surprised if at this point, Putin does anything. Why would he care to get this arms dealer back, especially when you can shove it down the United States throat and go? Nope. Nope. She was here head illegally.

It's against the rules. Maybe don't travel with weed to Russia. Probably a bad idea, right? Even if you're a world famous w B player, maybe you should follow the rules. I don't know if there's any, I can't name a single w B player.  no, on the backs of that. You should go watch the, uh, it's actually, um, a little bit of a letdown to me, but you should go watch, um, bill burs has a special on Netflix.

There's some funny parts to it. It takes a minute to get heated up, but there's definitely some good enough jokes that it's worth your time to go to go watch it. Um, a couple of them that I'll highlight for you. I won't give 'em away completely, but there's one about abortion. And he talks about how it's like the perfect analogy is like, you know, you can, I'm all for abortion.

He says, but you, you can't tell me it's not killing a baby because if I'm cooking a cake and somebody comes by before that cake is done halfway through the time in the oven and throws it on the ground. And I go, Hey, what, what the hell? Why why'd you. Destroy my cake and they go, well, wasn't a cake yet.

it's like, no, it would have been had you not thrown it on the ground. Right. It was a great, great bit, much better executed than I could ever do. So go watch that. Um, pretty funny, uh, but even better as Andrew SCHs, uh, recent comedy special, that's just released. I think there's probably like three days left.

If you're listening to this, you probably gotta buy it in the next two days to actually listen to it. But they pulled Andrew schuls comedy special from a major distributor, like Netflix, Hulu, somebody, um, and told him he needed to edit out jokes. Andrew schuls said, screw you and bought his for like a million dollars, bought his special back from them and then released it on his own and made three and a half times the money that he would've made in the first, like four days, then he would've made from selling it to one of those streaming services.

And I think this tells you where people are at on this. Like, people don't want somebody to be censored, right? People are willing to give their money up and don't want the censorship, AI fucking mark Zuckerberg algorithms to beat the human race out. Right. That's what I found to be like the most gross about this.

And I could go on a whole long tangent on the censorship stuff because I'm so, so beyond frustrated with how much it's like been the lynchpin for my success, with this, um, in, in how difficult it is to do anything without it. And, and the fact that just, I could go on forever about it, but the fact that Andrew S SCHs won out against these streaming services who wanted to censor him about his own jokes.

I find that to be incredible. I'm so glad that he did that. And it just proves, you know, to me that people are willing to support you. If you speak your mind and don't give in to the censorship, right. Um, So even better than bill burs is go watch Andrews schuls is special. I think it was just like, I I'm personally am definitely gonna watch it here in the next couple days and buy it.

Um, so definitely, definitely put that on your list of things to watch, uh, and support somebody who is speaking their mind in a time where you get ridiculed, ostracized, and censored for doing so. Uh, so anyways, that's all I got for that portion of the shocking update. Joe Biden trading a murderous arms dealer for a w N B a player who had weed.

I just, it baffles me that that is the trade. All right. So the next thing that we're gonna discuss here is going to be let's go ahead and watch this video of Kamala Harris at a recent discussion. Just basically giving the most hilarious intro of herself. Like it, it literally seems like a skit from of Michael Scott  from the office.

If he was in a position of political power right now, and just didn't understand how pronouns works. So here's the clip. Let's watch it together. And then we'll just, uh, good afternoon. I wanna love these leaders are coming in to have this very important discussion, um, about some of the most pressing issues of our time.

Um, I am KA LA Harris. My pronouns are she and her. I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit and, um, Oh, my God, my name is Kamala Harris. My she, my pronouns. Are she her? I am a woman sitting at a desk in a blue suit.  it's like, how ridiculous, how ridiculous are these pronoun things gonna get?

Like, how far are we gonna take this to where we have to, like, you could have given me an, any number of like, first of all, you're Kamala Harris. We know who you are. Second of all, you're Kamala Harris. We know you're a woman third. Well, yeah, we know you're a woman. Third of all, we know you're wearing a blue suit.

Fourth of all, we know you're sitting at a desk, like we're getting to a point now where reality has become so obscured that you have to identify the object in front of you.  because we're afraid somebody's gonna miss gender it as a chair instead of a table. Like, my name is Austin Adams. I identify as a, he him, I am a man sitting at a desk in front of a microphone with a blue shirt jeans.

I have 10 fingers and my favorite color is blue. Hmm. Like how far are we gonna take this? And, and also, I don't think Kamala Harris knows how pronouns work.  like saying a pronoun does not have to do with the color of your shirt, by the way, Kamala, if you didn't know that , it's like this clown show of an organ, uh, of an administration is just every, I I've yet to see a clip yet to see a clip, a single clip of a powerful.

Like, and I'm thirsty for it. Like I wish Biden and Kamala Harris would be incredible leaders. I wish the words coming out of their mouth would just run along my ears. Like the softest of silks  I wish they were bold in their speech. I wish they were confident. I wish that they said things that made people feel better in times of terrorism.

Like we've seen all across our nation domestically over the last year and a half of this presidency. I wish this administration the best. And that says a lot, but because I want what's best for our country. I what's be what's best for you and your family. I want what's best for me and my family. I want what's best for our country.

Despite my political beliefs, despite my beliefs about the election and how that went down, despite all of that, I want what's best for our country. And what's best for our country is when somebody is locked in for four years as the leader of our country, that they do a good job. And I have yet to hear a single speech, a single speech by either one of these individuals that was coherent, let alone powerful and impactful or comforting.

And I can't tell you how frustrating that is. I'm sure you understand, right. This is, this is our country. I like, I grew up as a Patriot. I love what our country stands for. I love what our people stand for. I love what our flag stands for. I love our constitution. Like if anything, I'm a, like a constitutionalist.

I believe in our constitution. I believe how it was written is how it should be.  and they're just literally trying to strip that away from us line by line with gun reform laws and censorship through third party AI algorithms. And like that's what baffles me the most about the censorship conversation and sorry that I'm going back to this again, but you're just so bothersome to me that we're being governed by AI algorithms in our speech.

Our constitution was not stripped from us by some politician with votes. Our, our freedom of speech was not stripped from us by somebody that we even put into power. Our freedom of speech has been ripped away from us by mark Zuckerberg's AI, robotic algorithm. And there's nothing you can do about it.

Nothing you can't, you can't even write a fucking support ticket to Facebook or TikTok and expect a response from a human, right. Like. It's so crazy that we've gotten to this point. It's so dystopian and literally every politician has dropped the conversation. There is not a single politician right now, who is vehemently going after these social media companies for censoring, all of the American societies, freedom of speech, all of the freedom of press.

Like nobody watches the news anymore. Nobody watches the news. Nobody's getting a damn newspaper delivered to their house. Nobody's doing any of that way of like the, what the press was before, the way that it is now we need constitutional, like fucking little bullet points under it that now outlined that like, how is there no conversation around the fact.

Where 90% of speech and news is released is also a freedom of speech platform, right? How is it that where so much of our conversations are like 90% of human interaction occurs on the social media platform, whether it's DMS, whether it's posts, whether it's Instagram posts, whether it's videos, whatever it is.

Freedom of speech where people where speech lies today is in social media where the press lies today is in social media, right? Where all of the, like people don't get their news the same way that they used to. So the fact that Instagram and YouTube and Google and Facebook, and all of these grimy little dweebs sitting in Silicon valley and China, communist China right now today, determining what you can say, determining what I can say and deciding whether anybody gets to hear it at all.

Right. They, it is just a, a loophole and it drives me nuts that there's not a single politician anymore. Who's even discussing this. Now a single politician is even talking about it on social media, because they're getting silence too. How the hell are these politicians? Not the ones who are speaking out against this because they're getting like, why isn't Ted Cruz?

Why isn't Rand, Paul? Why isn't Ron DeSantis? Why isn't Donald Trump? Like, we're like, oh, we're gonna take our party over here. No, the speech is happening where it's happening. The reform needs to happen there. And we need to make some type of legal recourse when a company decides who gets to say what and when.

Right. And we found this out recently that, you know, the FBI whistle blowers have come out and said that they are purposefully stifling, the recent release of information about hunter Biden's iCloud. Uh, league and I saw it literally with my post. I just got ripped off of TikTok for negatively talking about a pedophile.

I lost my platform for saying something negative about a pedophile who happens to be the prince of the United States of America, allegedly who can do no wrong. Even when he smokes, crack has sexual relations with underage family members that all of his family talks about gives half of our country's economy away through shell companies in Ukraine.

And yet I'm the one that's getting silenced for talking about it. And nobody, nobody in politics is currently making any concerted effort that I've heard of recently at all right. If you think back to like two years ago, where a year and a half ago where Ted Cruz was grilling mark Zuckerberg in front of Congress, um, like.

A congressional hearing where he was like the robot with the water and all this weirdness, I don't know this, this, this censorship stuff just drives me nuts. And what drives me nuts even more is the fact that it's the conversation's done. They conceded, they are now allowing freedom of speech to be a thing of the past.

Like, like anybody's buying a newspaper and you're going to legally stop them. Like they've, it's just a proxy. They're, they're stifling your freedom of speech by proxy, through AI algorithms with social media networks. The, if you don't think the FBI, the CIA, the department of justice, the Homeland security is actively in conversations with these social media platforms to stifle conversations around news stories and topics that they don't want discussed when they don't want them discussed.

Like the very thing that we saw with hunter Biden's laptop initially, and what we're seeing now today with the iCloud leak round two,  and nobody's talking about it. Nobody's doing anything. No legislation or bills are, are being written to be passed about it. Nothing. And they've conceded, they, they threw their hands up and they threw in the damn towel and they've literally allowed our freedom of speech to be ripped away from us in the last two and a half, three years.

And we are ideally standing by and allowing it because what are you gonna do? You gonna not use Instagram? And like, if, if you are not using Instagram to get the word out on something like this, or you're not using Instagram to promote your business, or like, what are you doing there? Cuz Instagram sucks right now.

Instagram sucks right now. Like you scroll Instagram the way that they just changed everything. And it's like every other post that you have on your timeline now is either sponsored or recommended in some way. And it's all shitty content cuz they're algorithms suck, go look at your Explorer page. It's terrible.

It's awful. And meanwhile, there's, they're, you know, stifling free speech about people saying negative things about pedophiles, cuz that's a going to be a protected class, just like all the other, you know, alphabet soup, transgender BS. So infuriating anyways, anyways. So the next video we're gonna watch, there's two situations that have come up recently about the shootings that have happened, both the Highland park shooting and the UAL day shooting.

Um, we're gonna discuss that. And so we'll jump right into it. The Highland park shooter was indicted by the grand jury on 117 counts. All right. So one more time. The Highland park shooter indicted by a grand jury on 117 counts. The Illinois state attorney's office has announced that a grand jury has indicted July 4th, Highland park shooter on 117 separate accounts.

Robert. Not gonna say his name is being charged with 21 counts of first regain murder, three counts for each child, victim killed 48 counts of attempted murder. 48 counts of aggravated battery with a firearm for each victim who was hit by a bullet or a bullet fragment. Um, in a statement, the state's attorney, Eric Reinhardt said that I want to thank law enforcement and prosecutors who pre presented evidence to the grand jury today.

Our investigation continues and our victim specialists are working around the clock to support all those affected by the crime that led to 117 felony counts being filed today. And this is  just a sensationalist way of going, like, what are you gonna do with 117 counts? If five of those stick, he's going to jail for life. They're just trying to like sensationalize and get the, the public eye and spotlight off of them. After so many people are pointing it. Every literal thing that could have went wrong, went wrong.

Every coward who could have been wearing a badge was wearing a badge that day. Even, you know, like the, just the grossest situation you could imagine. If you go watch the new footage, that's come out recently. It, it is just infuriating to even see like some guy literally getting hand sanitizer in the middle of a shootout where children are bleeding out in another room, five rooms away from him.

And he is getting hand sanitizer, another guy on his phone, laughing, smiling about whatever he saw on his phone at the time. And there was almost 300 officers on. And, and so we'll watch this video of prime time, Alex Stein, if you know who that is, he's the guy that's been going from, uh, like school district board meetings to city council meetings, to all these things.

And he is done like the raps about COVID and like all these very comical he's a comic to begin with. He's a comedian. Um, but this one ended up being a little bit different than what you would expect, uh, a little bit more serious on his part. I didn't, I, I was kind of expecting some type of comedy. I didn't know how he was gonna walk that line.

Um, but he did it fairly well here and there wasn't really much, much comedy. It was pretty serious and, uh, glad that he did here. Um, so let's go ahead and watch this clip. I'm here in Uvalde, Texas at Rob elementary school, the site of the mass shooting where 19 children and two teachers died. Normally I try to bring awareness in a humorous way, but tonight I'm speaking at the local city council meeting to expose the lack of response time from the police force 372 officers.

Waited 77 minutes to go in and stop Salvador Ramos. I'm here to bring attention to that so that nothing like this happens in the future. And we have police that are more courageous.

Thank you, council. My name's Alex Stein. And uh, a lot of times I speak at a lot of city council meetings. And usually I like to use my platform to make people laugh, to expose a lot of the leadership problems that we have. But here today, there's nothing funny. When I drive into your city, there's a stain on this city that will never be lifted ever.

It doesn't matter what you do. It doesn't matter how reactive you are. It's your lack of proactive result. We have principal Gutierrez who was fired that knew of security issues, knew of it. The principal knew of security issues and now 21 people are dead 19 students. So you can say, oh, well, it's not. It's the lack of police force.

What? Let me go chip. Let me use my three minutes. We're not the school district. Listen, I understand you're not the school district, but this your city. Are you the leader of this city? Do you lead this city? You're telling me the city council is not the leaders of this city. Is that what you're telling me?

Is that what you're trying to tell me, chip. So you guys don't consider yourself leaders. See, that's why it's because you don't consider yourself a leader. You don't take responsibility for your action. That's why you sit there. And that's why you are a direct reflection of these cops. They were cos it took them 77 minutes.

And you're a coward. You sit there like a coward, trying to combat what I'm saying. I'm bringing awareness to your city. You still had the audacity. After 21, people died. Chief Aaron Dondo, you SWM in. I don't care that he resign. You swore him in, you do two meetings a month. Mayor MC that's 20 meetings a year can't even show up.

I don't care where he is at. He should be here digitally. I don't see a screen with his face. This is 2022. We just had a pandemic. People can be at a meeting digitally and remotely, but you've all day. You can't figure it out. Because you can't protect your 21 kids and you can't run a meeting digitally because you know why he do protests too much, you know, you're guilty and you feel guilty and that's why you're yelling.

That's why you're combating me. And that's why I'm here to expose you guys because we gotta hold our leadership responsible for 21 people being dead. Do you realize that? Do you know how many people I think we all know, and we're all very frustrated with it happening. I know you did not pull the trigger, but it doesn't matter.

There is a set of circumstances that a domino effect happened. One domino set off stuff that a kid was able to get through an unlocked door and shoot 21 people.  that's pathetic. That's disgusting. And now this is the biggest story in the entire world. And guess what they're gonna take away. They're trying to take away the guns from 350 million people because a school couldn't lock a back door basically.

And because of the response time was so disgusting. 77 minutes. I have these pictures. This is not you've bald there. I want you guys to show you this. This is somebody doing hand sanitizer. He's more worried about protecting himself from COVID than protecting the 19 children that were bleeding to death.

This is a cop on his phone, smiling. There's nothing funny about 19 children bleeding to death on their cell phone saying I want my mom. And then when their mom tried to run in, what did they do? They stopped the parents from coming in the school. That's pathetic. That's disgusting. You guys should all be ashamed of yourselves and I'm going to expose this.

And I know with, let me just say my last point. I know the investigation will come out and you guys will probably not get in trouble because it's not necessarily your fault, but you guys as leaders should take responsibility for this in order to be proactive instead of reactive. So no more children had to die because right after the fact, you didn't let go of a Redondo.

If another school shooting would've happened, he still would've been in charge. Think about that. Thank you. Thank you guys. Oh, and if any parents wanna meet me and get any, you know, you want any attention, please contact me after the meeting. I'm Alex se, thank you.

So there you have it. So prime time, Alex dying, if you don't know who that is, he's a comedian and political commentator he's been on, uh, Tucker Carlson and stuff for, he did these like funny raps and this was a bit more serious for him.

You see him literally going off and the, uh, school or the city council. Now I, I don't know exactly what his point was on that. Was kind of a obscure, um, argument where he was just really frustrated and angry at them. It seems like he was mad that the, the head of the city council wasn't there. Um, and they weren't seemingly taking responsibility, you know, and that the individual that they allowed to be in the position that was there at the time made the wrong call, you know, and this is something that we're seeing come up recently is the fact that the, uh, it came out recently that the, I think it was the police chief was had, was struggling to find keys for a like 77 minutes or so until they realized that the door was unlocked.

Ugh. If it's, it's so sickening to me being a parent and just, I cannot imagine the heartache. And like, if I was a, a family member or a, a father or a mother of one of those children and, and he even points out like they, the mom was trying to go in there. Trying to go in there and got stopped and like literally put in handcuffs by, by police officers for trying to do so to save her children.

And there was another police officer who was there, whose wife was the teacher who got shot. And he got stopped from going in there when he was walking in there and looked at his phone. And, and she said that she got shot and texted him. And, uh, he like started to walk towards there, like halfheartedly and got stopped by the other guys who brought him back.

And like just a horrific situation. Now, again, I don't know what's exactly gonna come from something like that, just that, you know, really riled up speech, but God, some, somebody has to shed a light on it and I'm glad that Alex Stein did. Um, so, you know, tho those situations to me are just, just horrific and all of the new video evidence that's come out and the like almost was a 300 police officers, or even more that were out there at the time that literally did nothing.

and it seems like beating a dead horse because everybody knows it. But how do we get to that point? Where, where nothing was being done in this situation. And there wasn't a single person besides a mom who jumped a fence to go save her children. Um, just baffles me and I don't know, it, it, you try to go into like the systemic issue.

And obviously it has a lot to do with mental health. It has a lot to do with SSRIs and there's all these conspiracy theories. And like speaking of that, Alex, uh, Jones is on, you know, defamation trial or something like that for the Sandy hook situation. But. You know, there's been things that have come out that have showed grooming by FBI and CIA agents, pushing for people to commit things like this in the past.

And you know, this, this isn't a crazy, like the Sandy hook idea was that it was all staged and none of these kids existed. And there was a video of a dad, like smiling at the podium and getting into character. He went out and that was like defended somehow. Um, but I don't think it's that complicated. I, I think there's way too many loose ends for it to happen like that.

And, and all it could have been is a kid who's super troubled and they know where these watering holes of these like misguided youths are on the dark web and on four Chan and on Reddit. And they can find them where they're at and just prod them a little bit and send them a nice little care package.

And next thing you know, something like this horrific happens because we literally have yet to find a motive for these individuals doing this. It makes no sense, no sense in either of these cases, you know why this would've been done the way that it was, why they went after children, why they went after, you know, people on July 4th, like all of this horrificness is just baffling.

And, uh, so again, happy to see somebody shed light on it. Happy to see somebody like get riled up because we should be, we should all be so emotionally frustrated at this point with these things happening and in the conversation just immediately being politicized into something about the weapons. Right?

And we saw that with like the 22 year old, who literally shot a potential shooter at a mall, uh, last week and hit him eight times from 40 yards, which is like nuts and saved how many countless lives and how many you. News companies did not post about that. Right? That should literally be the shouting from the rooftops right now, by, by media companies that look, somebody saved these people.

There's a hero, these things happen, but there's also good people out there doing good things, protecting people from these things happening again, and they didn't wanna talk about it. They didn't wanna shed light on it, right? Just literally a 10th, a hundredth of thousandth of the media coverage on somebody saving lives with a weapon, protecting the lives of children and family and friends around him and random strangers in a public area.

And did it in a unbelievable fashion. If you know anything about shooting 40 yards with a Glock or whatever type of weapon he had with a pistol eight outta 10 rounds hit his target. Like. Nuts. And it was 22. Right. So obviously, you know, had some, I'd be interested to see what type of training he had there if he shot a lot or, um, but on a positive note, there are very good people out there like this young man.

Who are there to protect you, who carry with them every day, a tool just in case something happens around you and you should applaud those people. You shouldn't condemn them for carrying a weapon because they wanna protect people. Right. I thought, I thought that was an interesting statistic and the way that people view it, like people who view guns as the issue on this often view themselves as the potential victim, not as the potential protector.

Right. I know in these situations, if I'm ever in a situation like that, luckily I will have something around me. Most of the time, far high percentage of the time, where I would be able to protect myself and protect those around me in a situation like this. And I carry that for a reason because I know I am a protector.

I know, well, I will put myself in a PO position to stop something like this from happening. And I know too that I don't wanna be in that position and not be carrying. And not have the ability to protect myself or my family or my friends or random strangers or children around. And there's people out there that are like that.

And, and just applause to this young man for being one of those people who carries on him enough to have it in this situation and have trained too, not just carry it on you. Like it's a, a damn watch, but train enough to be able to utilize it in that situation effectively. Um, so on a positive note, there are heroes out there around you at any given.

Willing to put down their lives and protect you and protect your family members with a weapon. And we should applaud those people. We should scream their names from the rooftops. The fact that how many people can name the Highland park shooter, the UVA shooter, and how many would never even know an ounce of information about this 22 year old man?

Um, let's look up his name by the way, and give him some credit, talking about the fact that we don't bring these people up enough. Uh, let's find this man's name because he, his name should be brought up. His name should be on every news network, um, where they're talking about this, this individual. And so his name was so this reads a 22 year old man with a gun stopped in mass shooting at an Indiana mall on Sunday, saving countless lives.

According to authorities, the man who fatally shot the active shooter has been identified as Elijah Dicken. Here's what we know about the young man and the shooting. So Elijah Dicken is the hero who shot down a potential mass murderer mass shooter in this mall from 40 yards away with eight, very, very accurate, accurate rounds.

Using what I was correct. A nine millimeter Glock handgun. Um, Dicken started firing after only 15 seconds of the attackers. First shot. I will say this, his actions were nothing short of heroic. Greenwood police, chief Jim eon said Greenwood park mall surveillance footage captured early the entire incident.

He noticed he noted Dicken engaged the gunman from quite a distance with a handgun was very proficient in that very tactically sound. As he moved to close in on the suspect, he was also motioning for people to exit behind him. A good guy with a gun. Elijah Dicken, 22 years old has been cited as the hero who saved lives when he used his concealed carry weapon to stop a mass shooter firing into a crowded food court.

And these are the type of conversations that they're not having. Why? Because he carried a weapon. He protected people. He saved lives. His gun was legal. He carried it on him rightfully right with the constitutional carry that was passed in Indiana. Right. It did not fit the narrative. Right. And that's why they didn't want it being talked about because if constitutional carry was around, how many of these potential shootings would've been stopped?

How many people don't carry on them because they believe that they're, they don't wanna worry about these silly little laws and going to jail for legally carrying a weapon or they're whatever their card expiring or not wanting to go to the class, whatever it is that stops people, you know, how many lives would be saved.

And that's the, the, the conversation they don't want us having is there's heroes out there every single day. You. Willing to lay their lives in a line to move towards the shooter in these situations and stop them with the same thing that you're sitting here, trying to condemn and stop people from being able to carry, because one dumb ass child decides to go after people when they're gonna find a gun either way.

And we found that with Shinzo Abe's assassin who assassinated, you know, him in Japan, that he had a literal two pieces of metal pipe with duct tape wrapped around it and a piece of wood and found a way to make his own makeshift weapon and killed somebody with it. So we, we don't need to eliminate guns completely from the good guys because there's more guns than there are people out there.

And there's a very, very, very small percentage of sick individuals completing these, doing these crimes, but on a positive note, Elijah Dicken, you are a hero. Thank you for doing what you did and more of the mainstream media companies need to be covering this. All right. So again, thank you guys so much for listening today.

I appreciate it from the bottom of my. Um, I hope you enjoyed the conversation surrounding these things and go head over to the subst stack red pill, revolution dot subst stack.com. You will get all of the articles, all of the links, all of the videos, the topic videos, the full podcast episode, the video episode, LA LA you'll get all of it for free.

Right now. Eventually we may be moving to a paid subst stack only with a preview for everybody, but for now it's all free. So sign up right now. Red pill, revolution.subst.com. Head over to our website and sign up for some life insurance. If you don't see it on the day that this comes out, check a couple days later, cause I'm improving the website.

Um, changing some things around. If you haven't seen the website, go check it out. I don't know if it's published right now.  like, you'll probably look wonky. You'll probably see, like it started with like, um, yoga. Blog templates  so it's in the middle of construction. Go check it out. Might be funny for you.

Um, but anyways, thank you guys so much for listening. Go ahead and hit that subscribe button. Hit that five star review button. If you didn't hit the five star review button already, if you didn't hit the subscribe button, I forgive you. I forgive you. I forgive you, but I will not forgive you. Right. There's 500, 700 the thousand thousands of people listening to this right now.

And how many of you are gonna do that? Hit that subscribe button. And if you've already subscribed, hit that five star review button leave a nice little note. Um, it would mean the world to me. I appreciate you so much. If you're still listening to this, you are awesome. I love you. And, uh, I can't wait to talk to you again.

I hope you have a great day and welcome to the revolution. Thank you. 

In this week's episode, we take a DEEP DIVE into the Hunter Biden iCloud leak. We discuss his salacious text messages, shady business dealings and potential creepy situations with his underage family members. We also discuss Joe Biden admitting to the world that he has cancer in what appeared to be another rambling speech as the white house scrambled to disprove his own words. We talk about AOC pretending to be handcuffed, and Merriam Webster changing the definition of the word Women.

Subscribe and leave a 5-star review!

----more----

Welcome to the revolution.

Hello, and welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams, and thank you so much for listening today. This is episode number 36 of the red pill revolution podcast, and we've had a very, very interesting last few days and some crazy, crazy outbreaks of new information, including what is going to end up being a deep dive today.

So we're gonna have a few topics before it, but the main topic of today's discussion is going to be hunter Biden's iPhone iCloud leak. So we will get into that in detail. I don't know how long this is gonna go, but I got myself a nice bottle. Of, uh, basal Hayden here. That is absolutely, uh, just, just water in the bottle.

It's not actually whiskey. So, you know, I'll go ahead and pour myself some of that water now, because this is gonna be a fun, fun episode, the deep, uh, deep dive into hunter. Biden's iCloud leak. Now, the other thing that we're gonna talk about today is Joe Biden. Speaking of the Biden family, Joe Biden today saying that he has cancer in what seemed to be another dementia ridden speech.

Um, so the white house seemingly backtracking, we will discuss that as well. We're also going to touch on Miriam Webster, changing the definition of a woman in true 1984 fashion. They are now going back and changing the definition of our words and it is no surprise. The other thing we're gonna talk about is AOC faking her own arrest.

I guess she actually did, uh, get arrested apparently. During a protest about Roe V Wade, but, uh, we'll discuss that more and actually watch the clip together. Uh, we're also going to discuss quickly and briefly a article that I just found to be the most ridiculous title you've ever heard, which is humanity faces a collective suicide over the climate crisis, warns the you UN chief.

So this isn't like this, isn't just some random news article written by Joe Mo in his basement. This is the UN chief saying that there is a collective suicide over the climate crisis. And then on top of actually digging a deep dive into the iCloud leak from hunter Biden, we're actually going to discuss the possible federal prostitution charges that he may be facing after this leak.

So all of that, and more today, I'm very excited to talk it through with you guys. Um, so without further ado, episode number 36 of the red pill revolution podcast.

Welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams. Red pill revolution started out with me realizing everything that I knew, everything that I believed, everything I interpreted about my life is through the lens of the information I was spoon fed as a child, religion, politics, history, conspiracies, Hollywood medicine, money, food, all of it, everything we know was tactfully written to influence your decisions and your view on reality by those in power.

Now I'm on a mission, a mission to retrain and reeducate myself to find the true reality of what is behind that curtain. And I'm taking your ass with me. Welcome. To the revolution.

All right. Episode number 30, six of the red pill revolution podcast. And the very first article and discussion we're gonna have today is in true 1984 fashion. Merriam Webster changes the definition of female and they do it in a very obscure way. I find it to be very interesting here. So we'll read the article first, then we'll actually look at what Miriam Webster has to say about what a female is today.

Um, and then we will discuss it. So it says Miriam Webster's online dictionary has cave to the trans agenda. In order to appease woke activists, the dictionary publisher has added a secondary definition of female that defines the term as having a gender identity. That is the opposite of male. . The key term here is gender identity, which demonstrates that Miriam Webster maintains that gender is not directly connected to sex.

A female is a woman trans identifying males are not female. This is an article from. National review. So I don't know where their bias lies, but it seems pretty prevalent that they're not for this . It goes on to say that this is not only a part of the definition that has changed the online edition of Miriam Webster notice, the preliminary definition of female was originally of relating to, or of being the sex that typically has the capacity to bear young or produce eggs.

Hmm. That seems, you know, quite direct. And unobscured, to me, seems to make sense, right? If you can have eggs, allegedly, you are a female, but accordingly, according to Miriam Webster, that is not the case anymore. All you have to do is have a feeling in your gut, the eggs that you have, no ma no longer matter your actual ability to, uh, you know, make children and birth children.

You know, you've heard all these, all these terms now it's like birthing capacity last week. Um, before that was pregnancy capable, like all these ridiculous terms that you've heard lately, So what I find to be the most interesting without diving too far into some random article from the national review, um, is gonna be the fact that they changed it from originally what it was now, the original definition was, um, let's see here, if I can pull it up for us now, there, there was a few different definitions that they changed the first one being girl.

Okay. They changed the definition of what a girl is from a female child from birth to adulthood, to a person whose gender identity is female. So that's where this started. And I think that's where it's important to note is that the very first definition that they changed, when you look at the, you know, how the actual, you know, how the steps went here, the very first thing that they changed is what is a girl?

Well, a girl is a person whose gender identity is female. Okay. Now, if we're talking about what the actual definition and what words mean here, now we have to go look at the next step, which is what do they define as female? Okay. And that's what we'll look at here. So they originally had female. Definition was of relating to, or being the sex that typically has the capacity to bear young or produce eggs.

Okay. Makes sense. Now what they changed that to was, um, person who let's see what they changed that to was somebody who identifies as being female or the opposite of a male. Okay. So now we're playing ring around the rosy with definitions. So  we first started with what is a girl? Well, a girl is somebody who identifies as a female.

Okay. What is a female? Well, a female is the opposite of a male. Okay. What is a male? Well, a male is the person who identifies as the opposite of a female. So now there literally is no definition for what actually a male or a female is. It's just a sound that we say with our mouths that has no meaning.

Okay.  it seems to be, like I said, if you've read the book 1984, you know what I'm talking about? You know, what they do is they change the literal definitions of words, um, to change the way that society interacts in their language and change the way that people literally think, right? You think of, you know, double think and the, the ministry of truth and all of these things.

And one of the very first things that they did is they started to change the definition of words. And now we're actually seeing this happen here in reality.  so Miriam Webster has now made the definition of a female, the opposite of a male and the definition of a male, the opposite of a female, but nowhere clearly at all, identifies what either of those terms.

So they've essentially stripped humanity of the ability to, you know, identify with their own sexual organs. Like, you know, we've talked about this before, to me, it just, you know, you can be whatever you want, call yourself whatever you want, wear, whatever clothes you want, have, whatever job you want, do whatever you want to do.

You know, you can have whatever reality you want to create in your own head and, you know, surround yourself with people who believe the same things, but you don't get to push those ideologies onto other people. Right. You don't get to, you know, um, you know, like go back a few years and you remember the video of like the game, uh, what was it, uh, you know, in the, uh, God, what was it?

Um,  there was the story where it was like the, the I'm a maam. Like you remember the, how, the, how that, you know, whole situation went where this woman who I, I guess woman identified as a woman screamed at, at the guy behind this counter. Um, because he called him se, but she very clearly looked like a sir, you know, generally, according to societal standards in biology appeared to.

In every category, a man. Um, so, you know, kind of just pushing your ideology onto other people. And that's what we're seeing here with Miriam Webster is they've literally taken away and stripped everybody of their femininity and masculinity. And I think that's like kind of the end goal here is like, if you can take away the, you know, feminine power, like if you understand that, you know, I've, I've had this conversation, you know, before, it's like if you think of, of, of women in a literal sense, and you think of like what actual superpowers they have, um, between being able to 3d organically print a human  and multiply in the world.

And not only that, but the fact that a, a woman is, you know, they have their own cycle, right. You know, it's kind of a weird conversation they have, but you think about it this way. The moon has cycles, the earth has cycles. And so do women, they're literally attached to the world in a way that men are not.

If you put a man in a closed room with four walls and no windows, he will not be able to tell. When the months go by, a woman will be able to, her body does not need sunlight to know when the month changes. It, it it's quite crazy. So sorry, Miriam Webster, you don't get to change what a woman is. A woman is still and has always been and will continue to be somebody with a capacity to produce eggs and bear children.

Sorry. That's just the way it goes. All right. Now the next topic that we're going to discuss here is going to be AOC fakes, being handcuffed after an arrest at an abortion rights protest. And we'll actually watch the video here. Cause I find that quite comical now AOC has had a tendency of doing this, you know, between faking the fact that she was like, literally about to be murdered on January 6th, hiding under a desk.

When she was, you know, there was all this talk about, you know, she was actually had people around her who, um, you know, wanted to do her harm. And then little did we find out that there was no harm even close to her, but she said she was about to be like murdered on January 6th. She seems to like, to like incite these things.

And then if you go back a little, even further than that, she like took pictures in front of an ice facility. Like, um, and now she's pretending to get arrested. Like you can actually do, like, you can get handcuffed, like do something deserve to deserve being handcuffed and they will handcuff you. You don't have to go to these links to like.

Um, so we'll actually watch the video here, but we'll well, before we do that, we'll go ahead and read through this article, which says that, um, AOC was roundly mocked on social media Tuesday after she put her arms around, behind her back to imitate being handcuffed, following her arrest at a pro-abortion demonstration outside the Supreme court, the Bronx and Queens democratic lawmaker was gently escorted the way by a capital police officer, along with fellow.

City representative Caroline Maloney, after blocking traffic outside the court building AOC, it kept up the charade of being restrained for a few steps before raising her fist to supporters watching from the sidewalk. Now she's literally just doing this. So the, the three, four photographers that she sees, like up in her grill, get the shot that they're looking for and she gets to post it on her social media.

Right. I've talked about this before. It's literally click bait politics, right? That's all they're trying to do is get likes on social media and try to be famous. Try to be famous on Instagram and famous on TikTok by these videos of them, pretending to get arrested with her arms behind your back, like AOC, if you wanna get arrested, get arrested.

it's not that hard. Right. And you know, apparently they did actually get arrested, but never were actually, you know, in jail or anything like that. Of course. Right. Um, so let's go ahead and watch the video. I find it to be quite comical and I think that you will too.

So she has her arms behind her back until the photographers get their shot. And then two steps after that she raises her fist like she's Martin Luther king for pretending to get arrested at a pro-abortion rally  you can get arrested. It's really not that difficult. Right. You can actually be put in handcuffs if you want to be, if be about it.

Right. Um, so AOC as always, you are a clown. And, uh, maybe, um, if you actually did your job, instead of just looking to get likes on social media, people would like you. But I don't see that happening in the near future. All right. Um, now the very next article, which I'm just gonna touch on for a second here.

I really don't see it being worth our time to, to, you know, sit and harp on this, but I just found this title to be very interesting to me. Now, the UN chief warns that humanity faces a collective suicide over climate crisis. Now we've been seeing this conversation ramp up this week, like crazy. Like I've never seen so many articles being shoved down my throat, as I've seen this last week, over the climate crisis right now, it, before it was climate change.

And then it was global warming. And then it was, you know, what was it with Al gore, something about, you know, the, the next ice age is coming like, and now all of a sudden it's a collective suicide. Like I think that's probably a little disingenuous to say the least. And if nothing else, it's probably a little, um, You know, it, it, it's probably a little bit more than disingenuous to the actual word suicide because you know what you're doing there, right?

There's actually people who commit suicide now, I'm not gonna be soft enough to believe that he actually meant that that way.  but just to point out the fact that maybe we shouldn't use the word suicide, unless it's actually applicable. And in this case, it's obviously not right. We saw the heat waves in Spain and Europe, uh, temperatures above a hundred degrees, right.

It was like 40 degrees Celsius, 104 degrees Fahrenheit in the, um, in Europe today or yesterday. And they were freaking out about it saying how all these young, healthy people are going to die. Um, And in reality, you know, Arizona's 112 degrees the same day and nobody's dying. Afghanistan's like 175 degrees in the middle of the night and nobody's dying just because of the heat, especially healthy individuals.

Right. Um, and I saw some people saying like, oh well, but they have, we have air conditioning here. And their houses are meant to keep heat in. Okay. Air conditioning was invented in 1851. We have been here as a species homo sapiens for 200,000 plus years and probably a lot more than that. And we did that without air conditioning.

They literally built the fucking pyramids without air conditioning.  and yet you're gonna say that these random healthy CrossFitter Europeans are just gonna die because it's a hundred degrees out. Like, eh, I think you'll be all right. All right. So I do just think it's interesting. And this comes on the back of Biden saying that he's going to issue a climate emergency or something like that, which basically is, um, you know, uh, just a deeper way of saying he's gonna under more Mon money to his buddies who put him in office and, you know, kind of control everything that he's doing anyways.

Um, so, you know, we'll see what happens now, if he does do that, I wonder what gas is gonna be. You know, one can only imagine now, speaking of Joe Biden, Joe Biden today says that he has cancer. Thanks to the oil industry. Now the white house goes on to say that it was skin cancer years ago, but that is not what Biden said.

So let's go ahead and watch the clip. Then we will read this article and then we will discuss it. Here we go. It drove us. And rather than us able to walk and guess what? The first frost you knew what was happening. You had to put on your windshield wipers to get literally the oil slick off the window.

That's why I, and so damn many other people, I grew up have cancer and why I can't for the longest time.

So he says something about an oil slick, and you had to use your windshield wipers to get rid of the oil. And that's why I, and that's not why I did. That's not why I had, that's why I, and so many others have cancer. That's what your president of the United States just said today. Now I can't imagine what the actual administrative office of our government is thinking right now.

Watching the most powerful man in the world say that he in a dementia ridden, you know, speech like everyone that he ever gives, you know, and again, this is like, it's hard to have sympathy for the man when he's literally shoveling our country's grave. As we speak by peddling every single tax dollar that you've ever given and given in your entire life to Ukraine, just so that he can, you know, make the money back to Barisma through hunter Biden, which we're gonna find a little bit about more here when we go through all these text messages and iCloud situation.

Um, but let's read through this article. It says that president Biden said Wednesday that he has cancer. Forcing the white house to have a press conference to quickly clarify you mean lie on his behalf, cuz he said something that you didn't want him to say.  that he was referring to skin cancer treatment that he had before taking office last year, there were micro initially appeared to be a stunning CA stunningly casual health announcement during a speech about global warming.

And this is like, when you think of the president of the United States, they literally don't flush his shit on air force one because they're afraid of people like finding his poop and like figuring out the medical situation that he's in. Right. So then he literally goes on to TV. I don't know what this is.

If you're looking, I did like a robot  he goes on to TV and just casually announces that he has cancer talking about the climate crisis. It's uh, goes on to say, that's why I, and so many damn or that's why I, and so damn many other people I grew up with have cancer. And why for the longest time Delaware had the highest cancer rate in the nation.

Well, I'd like to see that compared to your soldiers, because the actual amount of U United States, military members and veterans that have cancer as a result of burn pits, agent orange, uh, asbestos, um, P OAS on air force bases that are the result of like leaking fluids at, uh, you know, um, you know, if you don't know this, it's like there's a documentary called the devil, you know, I think is the name of it.

And it's a whole documentary about 3m and it talks about the, uh, basically when, you know, we had a situation happen in my air force base when I was there. Uh, where, if there's. A jet fuel fire. Like if one of our aircraft lit on fire in a hanger, they had this foam that would basically cover up the entirety of the hanger in like 30 seconds.

And it would stop the, the fire from happening. But what they didn't tell you is that when it did that, it also leaked into all your water supplies and caused high, high levels of cancer rates and all of our veterans on us air force bases. And if there's a tracking website that you can go to where you can actually look and see the maps, like a heat map of where there's high levels of P OAS in the water.

And, uh, literally every single red mark on the map is an actual air force base. It's unbelievable. Um, so it's gonna be really, you know, quite terrifying to see down the road, how many people in the air force actually end up with cancer, um, terrify.  anyways, side note. You should look at the documentary cuz it's crazy.

Um, it goes on to say it's unclear. Why Biden chose to use the present verb tense to describe his experience with cancer? Well, you can't even say that he's an idiot and can't speak a full sentence or has dementia or, you know, you, you have to say it's unclear. Like, no there's either one of two options either.

He has cancer.  and you don't wanna talk about it or B he has dementia. That's a and B there's no C here. That's the only options here. But you decided to say it's unclear. Yeah. Okay.

um, Greg prince of X strategies, LLC tweeted. He said I have cancer in the present. You absolute dip shits  I love, I love how they quoted him there. Like it was a, just a beautifully articulated tweet about our president, um, anarchist author, Michael malice. Meanwhile joke. Don't worry about Joe Biden, having cancer.

He is married to a doctor

oh, the doctor Jill Biden thing just kills me. Um, it refers to the fact that, uh, first lady Jill Biden uses the honorific doctor to note her 2007 doctorate in education. Hmm.

It goes on to say that skin cancer is extremely common, especially among older adults who didn't wear sunscreen in their youth and generally isn't life threatening. Okay. Who cares? All right. Moving on to the thing that we all want to discuss here. Is hunter Biden facing possible federal prosecution for prostitution charges after new documents are released.

Now we'll go ahead and watch this video. Um, the video that we're watching is coming from ABC 33 40. I don't know if that's an actual yeah, it looks like it's an actual ABC news. Uh, good on them for actually posting this. Um, so let's go ahead and watch this video where it discusses the actual prosecution chart or the, the prostitution charges.

And then we will discuss it a little bit. And then we are going to do a deep dive into everything about this iCloud leak, every single article, every single topic, all the disgusting pictures, which we won't show, um, cuz they're terrifyingly gross. And so is hunter Biden. Um, all of the drug use all of the shady shady business deals that hunter Biden was involved in.

Um, but first let's go ahead and watch this video and then we'll discuss. But before we do that,  the first thing I need you to do is go ahead and hit that subscribe button, whether you're on apple podcast, whether you're on Spotify, whether you are on Google podcast, I don't know who listens to Google podcast, but if you do shout out to you, um, wherever the hell you get your podcast, audible, I don't know, but go ahead and hit that subscribe button and leave a five star review.

It would appreciate it so much. It means the world to me, if you want some good karma in your day and you don't know how to get it, you can get it right now. All you have to do is hit that subscribe button. All you gotta do is hit that five star review button. Tell me something you love about the podcast.

I would appreciate it so much. All right. The next thing you need to do is go over to red pill, revolution dot sub stack.com. And every single week I am back at it. Sun. I am putting out subst stacks every single week with a podcast companion, all of the articles, all of the videos, all of the topics and a little, uh, transcription slash article that I'll write up about one of my favorite topics of the week.

So you can go ahead and get that for free. Right now, red pill, revolution.dot com, or head over to red pill. Revolution dot C o.com is for losers. All right. Red pill, revolution.co, and you can actually sign up for the subs right directly there. Get the podcast, the video podcast, all of my topics broken down into YouTube videos.

Um, uh, like I said, all of it for free. Go to red pill, revolution.co. And while you are at it, go ahead and hit that. Get a quote button, find yourself some life insurance. It's the only way you can support this podcast right now. And I would appreciate it so much. All right, now, that's it. That's all I got.

All right. Here is the hunter Biden, uh, video about him facing federal prostitution charges. After a new document is less leased released. Hmm. And here we go. The secret service now saying they are aware of a potential hack in a hunter Bidens iCloud account, some alleged content already posted online. The hack still UN unconfirmed suspicions.

Now arising that Google was censoring search engine results. As hunter Biden related news broke Monday, multiple users posting photos on Twitter of fruitless searches. The daily mail reporting hunter Biden may Face's federal prostitution charges for bringing three escorts from Boston to New York for a fun night.

That may actually classify as a, not so fun. Federal offense, transporting prostitutes across state lines. Hunters escorts often have ties to Russia timelines show. He would pay for these services after receiving large money wires from his dad. No evidence shows Biden knew how hunter spent that money.

Another controversy emerging involving the president, his son, and the sale of nearly a million barrels from the American strategic petroleum reserve to China, literally giving away our emergency supply. And we're not seeing the gain from that. A private equity firm previously tied to hunter Biden has a $1.7 billion stake in the Chinese state owned company.

Biden sold oil to is another example of how bad things really smell with all the issues around hunter Biden. How hunter Biden got high up positions in these companies, still unclear critics, arguing his connections had more value than his talent. I think the American people deserve the truth on this because Joe Biden is certainly compromised.

DOJ, still assessing if they. All right. So that sounds like they're going a little bit more in detail than I want. But basically what this says is that the secret service confirmed Monday, that they are aware of a potential hack, a potential hack. Yeah, absolutely. Is his hack. You can tell by his grimy little hands, all over a crack pipe, you know, and, and, you know, stroking the hair of a, I don't know, didn't see that, but allegedly underage Asian women, um, or children.

Uh, so it says secret service confirmed Monday that they're aware of a hack into the president's son's iCloud account. Some alleged content has already been posted online through the site. Four Chan suspicions are now arising that Google was censoring search engine results. As hunter Biden related news broke Monday, multiple users posted photos on Twitter of fruitless search.

Yeah, right. Fruitless. There's a whole Reddit feed. I found very easily that shows all of this very, uh, very in depth. So, um, and again, I'll share that on the subst. So if you're listening to this right now, or you're on the live on TikTok, go ahead. Over red pill, revolution, subst stack.com. All right. Now, um, it goes on to say that, uh, hunter Biden may face federal prostitution, prostitution charges for bringing three escorts from Boston to New York for a fun night that may actually classify as a federal offense transporting prostitutes.

You mean sex trafficking? That's what that is. That's not transporting prostitutes is sex trafficking, not whatever the hell they just called it. Transporting prostitutes, sex trafficking across state lines. Hunter's escorts often have ties to Russia reports indicate timelines show he would pay for these services after receiving large money wires from his dad.

No evidence shows president Joe Biden knew about Hunter's. How hunter spent that money? No evidence really, because he literally sent him, like, it was like $5,000 while he's sitting there talking with a prostitute on a video or something. I don't know. Um, wild. So we'll, we'll go into that in just a minute.

We'll finish reading this article though. It says another controversy emerged involving the president, his son, and the sale of a, nearly a million barrels from the American strategic oil reserve to China. And that's another part of this. So there's like really three main parts of this hunter Biden, iCloud leak, which is, you know, a, a, an in addition to the Mac release, like the, the, his, um, his, uh, laptop release that was during the presidential election.

And this is like 456 gigabytes, like a ton, a ton of data. Now there's a website. I'll give you guys where you can search through every single one. Of his emails that were on there, including all of the, uh, Barisma emails, um, the Rosemont Seneca emails, which was his, uh, um, which was his company that he was a part of, that was an investment in consultant foundation company that, you know, basically just Pedald his dad's influence for money.

Um, so we'll talk about all of that, um, in just a second here, but now we'll move over to basically what is a, a really good breakdown of this. Now this is through Reddit. Um, and then the title of this article was, and it was posted six days ago by Walter Oche. Um, and it's the title of this is the hunter Biden saga continues.

Now he goes on to post what, um, some, you know, basic screenshots and, uh, talks about how they're talk. They're kind of trying to, you know, push a lot of this conversation away from the business dealings and more towards his like crack and prostitution usage. Um, Which eventually is tripping him up anyways with these prostitution charges.

Uh, but um, this individual says I have followed the hunter Biden saga for years. Allow me to sum up and address some of the disinformation. I just hate the word disinformation. I think it's so stupid. We don't just get, like, what, how, what was the first time you heard that word? Right? Like how, how many times have you heard the word disinformation?

Five years ago? Um, I dunno. I dunno. Just rubs me the wrong way. Um, I have follow, allow me to sum up and address some of the disinformation. That is a part of the modified limited hangout, modified limited hangout being run. Okay. That's. Obscure. Um, first there are three pictures that have been making the rounds that are intentional.

Um, the first one is Natalie Biden with cocaine on her nose. It's not Natalie sure. It's a striking resemblance, but it's verified as being a cam girl. Um, this as being used by others to say that the data is fake, but really their argument is that is what's fake. Anyone with the data knows this picture.

Isn't real Joe Biden with an Asian girl. This is actually a BDSM, uh, video from X videos that has been around for years now. I've seen this circular. I like had some people send me this and I like didn't even open the video. Cause I was afraid that it was real. And you know, I don't know. Didn't, didn't want to get caught in that, you know, crossfire of whoever's gonna, you know, be seeing exactly who's opening this, but there was a video that looked, uh, quite a bit like Joe Biden where he's has this woman like kind of like, I don't know, a little, a little too, uh, uh, crazy, but he was basically like, um, I don't know, it looked like a younger Asian girl and he was like some way assaulting her with some type of like object.

I don't know, not like sexually, but like, yeah, kind of weird anyways. Um, he's saying that that was fake. And in the next one, he says, is hunter Biden with five young girls. This is not hunter Biden is hunter Biden was never, uh, sported the eight black soul patch.  that's probably the only thing that would make hunter Biden look crazier is if he did have a black soul patch  um, now it goes on to say that is hunter Biden a pedophile?

Yes. He searches for underage pornography as it states here. And that's was shown by in his search results. During this, uh, iCloud leak, there was something that he searched like 12 year old girls, like. Some type of websites that he was looking for that, um, it says that he is constantly accused of being a child molester.

He sleeps with Natalie Biden. Natalie Biden is, um, he sleeps with young cousin Lilly and he's engaged in grooming behavior and is likely providing drugs to underage family members. Um, now this person comes with the receipts, every single thing that they're talking about, he kind of, uh, or she, somebody, um, kind of links, a bunch of different things showing, um, his search results, right?

So he was looking on X videos for 12 years old. He was in shows some of his like searches that he was looking for. Um, and then the other thing that it goes on to show that, uh, and I'll post all of these, you know, not obviously all of the data, but I'll post the actual post itself for you guys. So you can see it through the subs stack.

Um, but it also goes on to show these screenshots. Now, if you don't know, I believe, um, Natalie is his younger niece. Um, Natalie is his younger niece who is underage. That is the daughter of his late brother, Bo Biden's wife, like his niece, his niece, and he's being super creepy. And it goes on to show you some even worse things about their conversations, including them meeting up in like a trader Joe's bathroom.

Like you think that Joe Biden would have a classier place, um, but pretty, pretty wild stuff. Now I have a thing here where I would love to just contact every single trader Joe's within 25 miles of where they live and try and because there's literal timestamps, this was on, you know, the, the actual conversations that they're having here was October 8th, 2018, so four years ago.

Um, and I'll read the conversations for you. Um, and this is coming from his underage age niece. It says, I love you more than anything in the world. Are you coming home to sleep with me? Underage niece, Natalie, you are wonderful. He says aunt DIA and maybe uncle David will be there tonight. I know that David thing was just a joke, but aunt Daria is not.

So I'll see you tomorrow. I guess. Call me in a few minutes, please. Um, she says, I love you. Come home, please. Where are you? Come home. Can you call me please? DIA, just left. So you are the person watching us. What does that mean? You are the person watching us. That's creepy. Um, I love you so much, uncle. I fully understand why you are mad at me.

You are the re the adult said I'll never, uh, I'll never be over in a bit or I'll be over in a bit. I love you, Natalie. Can we please just have a little faith and compassion in and for each other right now and you're right. I am the adult and I need to take responsibility for myself and for my connection with you no more playing the cop or the guardian angel, no more playing the role you think your daddy played.

I failed you in that way. I can only take responsibility for myself. That is like, even if you're not being creepy, that's a creepy, weird conversation for you to be having with your knees. Super weird and creepy. Um, then there shows a, another screenshot of him saying, you know, in the conversation with somebody, like, it seems like a prostitute, uh, or a, you know, what do they call the woman?

The Madam saying that your child bride is having a tough year. So that was another conversation that was had, um, even shows him like writing a rap  hunter Biden wrote a rap. All right. You want to hear hunter Biden's rap? Um, it's called lolli girl lolly girl. Okay. Um, which is telling, because it talks about toes  and a lot of hunter Biden's, uh, videos and stuff that was, uh, that was pushed out, showed him having some sort of weird feet fetish.

I don't know. Um, lolly here's here's his rap. Okay. Lo lolly, your okay. There's explicit words here. So if they hurt your ears, you know, close 'em Lolli lolli your bi%#h on her knees sucking my toes. She a thoty popped a lot of Molly lolli lolli that thoughty has a body. She is very naughty sucking on my lolli doing lots of Molly.

You are such a thoty Wow. This 50 year old man is writing raps about somebody sucking his toes I don't know how, if you're hunter Biden, you haven't like moved to a far away country to escape the embarrassment of your own actions. Um, This goes on to say that there does appear to be nudes of Natalie, which again, this is niece underage niece.

Um, but his criminality doesn't stop there. I get that. People want the salacious stuff first, but keep in mind, hunter Biden participates in policy decisions that the president of the United States. So that's the important part is like, there's a lot of deflection here, like showing him smoking crack.

Right. And then Joe, Biden's gonna turn that into a positive, right? Like, oh, everybody smokes crack. You know, even though there's a video that surfaced recently of him saying that, you know, even if there's, um, like fingernail size amount of crack, that you should go away to jail for a really long time. Um, but it goes on to say, uh, it goes on the show, like a lot of his, uh, emails and stuff, and even, um, some voicemails, it appears.

So let's see if we can even hear this voicemail and see what it has to say here. Now, again, this is gonna be a slower episode than normal. We're gonna take a, a deep dive into this. So we're gonna kind of jump around here and have some slower conversations than usual than just, you know, Uh, one off, uh, topics here.

So let's, let's see if we can actually hear this. Hey, who is dad? I'm in DC. Mom's teaching. Uh, I left, I have to go visit, uh, have a meeting. I told you about Hillary. I'll be gone. I'm in the car now heading there. Probably won't be back till one, my meeting 3, 4 30 my guess, but I left the door and the gate open to the house.

If you're in DC, I love you. Let me know where you are when you get choose. Okay. So that sounds very much sounds like Joe Biden  um, uh, just appears to be a voicemail, um, goes on to show, oh, just showing that. So basically what that portion of it is just showing is that he's engaged in these policy decisions and that he's flying all around and getting voicemails from his dad about, you know, the meetings that his dad is going to and other things, uh, Now, it also shows now an individual that's been a huge part of this and including Rosemont, Seneca, a ton of the emails that were Le released, um, a ton of the shady business deals that were done.

Um, it was actually the individual who helped him set up Rosemont, Seneca, so he could pedal his dad's influence. Um, there's an email here that says your dad's Delaware tax refund check came today. I am depositing it into his account and writing a check in that amount, back to you since he owes it to you, don't think I need to run it by him, but if you want to go ahead, I'm gonna give you money.

And if you want to ask him if it's okay, you can do that. But I don't think you need to, if not, I will deposit it tomorrow. Now again, that's Eric swearing. Um, who is a kind of a shady character within the Biden family who is taking care of their finances for a while also helped run and helped pedal his dad's influence to all these companies through the shell company, Rosemont, Seneca, um, which we will talk about more in a little bit.

Um, this goes on to say the a hundred Biden engages in a lot of illegal behavior, which makes him ABL, which makes him black mailable. This is a huge national security concern. His payments to Ukrainian based escort service, U B E R G F E triggered a bank red flag as over $200,000 that hunter Biden paid to a single prostitution company in Ukraine.

Um, this also comes with receipts showing the actual, uh, suspicious activity information from JP Morgan bank.  so there's the actual email from them talking about the payments that he was making to this prostitution company in Ukraine. Um, now, uh, don't see the reason to read through that for you, but if you wanna find it, go ahead and find that, write it article and you can see exactly what I'm talking about here.

Um, let's see. It says hunter writes checks to his escorts to cross, um, to cross state lines via plane and train. Now, this is what tripped him up, I believe from the sounds of it. Um, so it says hunter Biden participates in human trafficking and it shows the actual checks that he's writing as well as the plane and train tickets for the individuals that he was sending.

So there's literal receipts of him buying train tickets for prostitutes. In other words, sex trafficking.

All right. And it goes on the show, basically all four of the receipts there. It says, in one instance, hunter Biden buys a GPS tracker and has a woman place it in another woman's car, literally stalking. And it shows the conversation in the text messages. Now this is what's crazy is again, there's 456 gigabytes of data on this release.

So it's like so difficult to even go through it all. Um, but I'll read you a little bit of the conversation. Um, it says let's see here. Um, it says that I want to get my phone under her seat. Um, no, do it tonight. And this is hunter saying this? No, do it tonight. If you come with old phone and get a backup power thing there for it, get, get a backup battery.

So he was taking a cell phone, having a different woman, put it under the seat in a car of another woman's car. So he could stalk and track somebody. Um, Crazy. Then he goes on to like, literally go after this woman to make sure that she did it. She said, I charged the phone in battery pack leaving. Now. I also ordered that GPS to the device work call.

Uh, we'll call you in five minutes. This is obviously a foreign individual with the way to texting. He said, dude, you're killing me. She said, sorry, you gotta work no other way to get money. Um, he says, Hey, just text me some info that you're getting, babe. I may come in tonight. She said, huh? What info? He said in all caps, didn't you put phone in car?

she said, yes, I didn't understand your tax. Sorry. Ready to send it? He said that's because you don't love me anymore. Like literally like a 15 year old in a weird early stage relationship. Um, she said, yes, I do. I'm just going through a lot. He said, kidding. Kidding. If you can get me skinny spinner chick, that likes what I like.

Let's hang out at R R N. What's wrong. How do I help sweets? What a fucking creep. All right. Next thing it goes on to talk about is going to be the Troy hunt database, um, which has all of your email and password combinations while hunter Biden's credentials are in them along with the rest of the Biden family.

Now, this is the Troy hunt database is basically a large, large data. Of email and password compilations from a huge leak that was done free, or a, a huge leak that you can find, um, where this is. I'm pretty sure where they actually cracked his password from, um, this is like four Chan and this like, whatever weird, um, whatever four Chan is, , it's like a, a, a, um, Reddit just without rules.

Uh, basically just went on a big effort to try and see if they could break his iCloud and they found it through these leaks here. Um, now it says that this data is a source of many, many leaks, including the who and Wuhan Institute of virology. It says in early 2019, hunter Biden's Rosemont Seneca email password, along with Rosemont, Seneca passwords were leaked.

Even prior to that, the corruption surrounding hunter Biden, Rosemont, Seneca was already widely reported on, and it shows some articles, including a New York post article titled inside the shady private equity firm run by Carrie and Biden's kids. And that was in 2018. Another one was by the AB Q journal, which was there's a hunter Biden, Santa Fe connect.

Through its uh, through the old Rosemont Seneca, uh, Rosemont Realty now controlled by a Chinese firm. It shows some emails from that. It says a freedom of information request provides the allegations in the aforementioned news articles where true Rosemont Seneca Behe, uh, bank records listing. So it shows the actual bank records.

And it says prior to the leaks, we were already looking at a 100% certainty of corruption with a web of cutouts Rosemont, Seneca Boha harvest Barisma Robinson Walker, LLC transatlantic energy group. Um, can't pronounce this Chinese name, Syne Hawk Thornton group, LLC, Seneca global advisors, Hudson west, uh, the third boys Shiller Lionheart group.

Um, and it goes to show receipts for each one of those.  um, and is talking about all the different incomes that he is making through each of these different shell companies. It says this corruption is merely an extension of why Hillary Clinton began with the uranium one scandal where the mining and energy complex is consolidating power monopolistically.

Uh, it says, in fact, we see an extension of these globalist type plans for American resources, plain as day in Hunter's data. I don't really have an opinion on the originating laptop draft off for repair, but I suspect that the leak was inevitable because hunter Biden's accounts were already compromised by the run of the mill internet investigators.

The floodgate was already opened, but where I sat, I was concerned, the laptop repair story was exceedingly convenient, but whatever, eh, it seemed convenient because they held onto it till when they needed it. And then it got shut down just like this story did by Google  of course, cuz that's just what they do.

Um, now. Let's see, uh, this goes on to say that this was approximately, this is an early October of 2020. The first trip, uh, occurred publicly. I was sent a mega link that has now expired that contains some of the laptop materials. This was approximately the first sample I received. Um, the first damming thing was evidence of a wire transfer from Chinese intelligent asset to Hudson west.

The third LLC, the rest was a bit random and it shows that, um, wire transfer and actually gives the links to all of it. Interesting. And even more of what's going on here, including what appears to be a pregnancy test. I think this is all of hunter Biden's conversations. Um, yeah. Interesting. Wow. There's some really, let's see if this is even his stuff here with DIA.

Wow. Um, now there's some even more interesting text messages that talks about his niece, right? Um, And even like, you know, talking about how he met up with her in that trader Joe's bathroom, I'm pretty sure it was trader Joe's or some, something like that. Um, but it says, we already know that the emails and banking records are real per the free freedom of information act, request.

The number of emails can also be verified with D K I M authentication and also being available to see both sides of the conversation like the Devon Archer's email from his own account to and from hunter Biden. It says the second largest set of files included a mass amount of salacious content. The, the people surrounding this conference controversy love to focus on hunter Biden's genitals in order to distract from the corruption.

Indeed, a file named screenshot blank, blank, blank, um, shows hunter Biden's. In his Wiener on a piece of pizza.  what, what many escorts are featured in this data? Dump? Unlike what was minimally reported on their faces were visible and uncensored. I rant them all through facial recognition right away with mixed results.

Indeed. They are mostly escorts, but Hailey Biden and other friends. Ash Akai grant are also feature featured with hunter Biden naked. And one of the pictures hunter is with his computer, where he is logged into, uh, a porn account where he is uploading videos of him and Hailey and others engaged in sexual behavior, Bo Biden.

Then by the way, seem to be fully aware of the relationship between hunter and Hailey, Hailey being his brother's wife, who ended up dying. His brother ended up dying and he ended up being in a relationship with his brother's wife, his dead brother's wife. So that tells you anything about his character says seem to be fully aware of this relationship between hunter and Hailey, where hunter sent him pictures of acts together.

This is why many believe Natalie and or hunter, maybe hunter Biden's biological children. So he is doing that to his own daughter. Says at this stage in 2 20 20, the Q movement, all, but shut down, they had seemed to be waiting for something like this. For years, they finally had it all in the entire Q astroturfing movement, completely shut down.

And, uh, they deleted itself from the internet. This was very suspicious. The conservative new news outlets refused to cover what was in the first set of leaks, which was only a portion of the hard drive. Uh, it says zero hedge, gateway, pun, big league politics, all these outlets. I would've expected to jump all over this content did absolutely nothing.

In fact, they even participated in some light disinformation. In some cases

it says, um, I pose it don't know what that means that the cube movement was a Carlisle group SIOP, um, aided by numerous astroturfing firms like up votes.club, but was also a by government contractors like C a C.  in Q I N E T I Q. Um, it says one concerning aspect of hunter Biden's data, data that was available in 2020 was that the heavily featured Natalie Biden, hunter Biden was in possession of hundreds of her personal pictures.

It appeared to be obsessive beyond the pictures. It became clear that many people were concerned about hunter Biden, sexually inappropriate interactions, where he is naked and smoking crack in front of Natalie Biden. Um, it says what is also concerning concerning, and it goes on to show some of the conversations here, and this is where it gets interesting.

Okay. So finally found this portion of it. Okay. So here's the conversation where he is talking about, uh, talking to Natalie. Um, and this is what the conversation says. It says, I'm sorry, Natalie, but she won't even take my call. She's made her decision clearly she's chosen what, uh, she's chosen to do what ha Haley wants her.

And she says like, Dar teaches the rest should just worry about themselves. That includes me and. I guess you and hunter and your aunt, and I love you, but your mom just decided that she is willing to risk having you taken from her rather than spend a month with family in Malibu. She told pop that she would call the police if you tried, if I tried to see you and hunter, um, so it's basically just outlining, you know, exactly these like weird obsessive inappropriate conversations with a minor that is within his family, including a, I want to fold clothes for you is what he sent her, which is, I think is a reference to a J Cole song.

I don't know, you know, any other reference to that other than this J Cole song that I know, um, which is, uh, you know, go look it up. Um, but it says in bathroom at whole foods, so not trader Joe's, but whole foods. And this was 5 29 of 18 at 1:51 PM. Why would you text somebody that you're in the bathroom at whole foods?

Now the conversation continues and it says, yes, it seems like an endless test of my sanity to hate as much as I do right now. Um, Hailey won't let me see Natalie, without my father present, it says, can you imagine that that is messed up? So it says that is, you know, effed up that I've effing shielded for two years and taken all the heat is keeping me from, uh, talking to or being around her.

Um, it says, hunter, it is imperative. You call me or your father. Now I believe this is his mother. This is from, uh, this says Jim Biden. Hunter is imperative that you call me or your father. Your father is, uh, getting as I am, uh, barrage by Hailey. He has not responded and I have not responded. We both agree with you and trust you.

She is spreading what you told me and I believe you, which is the fact that he was in a sexually inappropriate relationship with his niece. And he says that there lies once again, we both need you to side or your side of the story so we can both shove it down. Her effing throat. I implore you the call, please.

I, we are on your side. I believe you. This is nothing short of character, assassination, assassination. Love you. Jim sounds like Jim is his uncle. And it goes on to say that, um, let's read through more of this conversation and says, or my mom tells him things like I'm sexually inappropriate with the children.

This is hunter Biden's words too, in this case, uh, which just gives you the phone number. Um, now continuing this conversation about who he is sexually inappropriate with his own cousin and all of the receipts and text messages showing this says, call your mother. Now, this is a, uh, I can't read it through it, but it says call your mother.

It seems every time we talk, she's telling people I'm inappropriate with you. So this is too Natalie. And the only reason it's blurred out, which I can't see is because she's underage. Um, and you can tell by the way that she talks, uh, she says, call your mother. It seems every time we talk, she tells people I'm inappropriate with you.

I don't want to make matters worse for you or for myself. This child said bra. And then a bunch of words, hate life, man. I'm on the airplane. A I R P L a I N  with no headphones. Um, and then, uh, he says back to that, she said that when aunt blank told the girls, they shouldn't be with me alone, that it proved she was just plain evil and mean, and that she was hurting the girls more than she was hurting me.

um, it says, lastly, that he is inappropriate with Natalie. He Factimes everyone naked. Wow. What an embarrassment he is. He clearly can't be around my children. Um, there's the phone number directly on this three oh two five three oh zero six. I'm not gonna give you the rest of it.  um, and it goes on to say that, um, he says, again, telling people I'm inappropriate with her daughter.

So we get the point. He was absolutely. And his entire family believes that he was sexually inappropriate with Natalie, who is his niece, um, who was underage at the time of all of these conversations. I don't know how she old she is now. Um, and then goes on to say, and the last one that you would have to, when she says, can I come up there, please?

Uncle I'm dying inside. So depressed can't handle life. He said you would have to come with adult because you can't stay with me. Cuz everybody thinks that hunter Biden is a pet aile.  interesting. So it shows literally all the text messages, which you got directly from the iCloud dump. All right. Now that.

Probably should be brought up legally anyways. Um, but it goes on to say, um, it says what is also concerning that despite being banned from seeing her alone, hunter Biden is still meeting in secret with Natalie in places like a whole foods bathroom. Natalie is. On a family outing, then sneaks to the bathroom to meet hunter Biden, to fold clothes by mid 2021, it is clear many people had Hunter's data and the hard drive was repackaged in a variety of ways with each repacking, data was taken and inserted.

I gave up relying on these anonymous dumps and focused on how to verify what was important. And with the, uh, with the usual O S I N T techniques, they always cry about source verification and context. So what is important to preemptively? Give it to them, to take away their crybaby ammunition. Now that the issue is, has gained more steam.

You can actually per peruse a lot of these emails yourself and the website. Now this is important. The website that you can actually go to to search every single one of, one of hunter Biden's emails is hunter laptop emails dot. Now, when you go to this website, I went to it and there's some really interesting things that you can search.

The few ones that you can search is the big guy, a second one that you can search is come pizza. And you'll see some emails from that. Um, you know, you can see emails about, you know, another little key search term I used was illegal and you can start to see some of the shady business dealings that he had there.

But I recall one where the swear or whatever that guy's name was, that was a part of Rosemont. Seneca actually discussed him, going to a Hillary Clinton party at come ping pong in Washington, DC. And if you don't know about come ping pong, if you've ever heard of the term Pizzagate pizza gate was allegedly a conspiracy where, uh, all of these celebrities, um, and Hollywood elites were getting together at comic pizza and doing all sorts of satanic pedophilia, ritualistic BS, um, and you can see it directly in there that he was invited to these parties, which allegedly never happened.

And we're all, you know, A bunch of politicians playing ping pong together at a pizza place.  um, now it goes on to say that, um, in most of the reliable ways to see the new leak is just by downloading the torrent yourself and opening an iPhone backup extractor, um, it gives the magnet link and it says, so now here we go again, whenever conservative news outlet should be screaming this stuff from the rooftops, it seems that nearly all hunter Biden's posts are getting deleted on all sites, even for Chan, especially Reddit, Twitter, and in Twitter is banning people consistently over it.

Um, it says in short, there are one, there is 100% proof of criminality of a variety of types showing that the Bidens are above the law and will destroy your country for pennies. On the dollar says that hunter Biden will sell out billions of American resources for crack and hookers. He must be stopped and this behavior is ongoing and it continues to give screenshot after screenshot, after screenshot, after screenshot of these.

Transfers from these companies in the millions of dollars for these shady, shady business deals. Okay. Um, we'll see if I can go through any of these here. It just seems to be a receipt after receipt, after receipt of him receiving just hundreds of thousands of dollars from all of these Chinese corporations, um, all these conversations that are, uh, through about his payments from these companies.

So on and so forth. Um, now let's go see if we can actually jump over to that website with all of the emails here. Cause I think that was a little interesting to me and it's where you can actually get. Put on your tin, foil hat and get pretty, uh,  pretty wild going to this website here. Um, so let's go there and see if we can search some of these emails.

Now, before I do that again, the next thing I need you to do head over to red pill, revolution.co. Um, this is literally the only way that I have any monetization guys. I don't have any paid advertisers. There's no third party ads here, nothing at all. Um, the only thing that I do ask of you is if you are married, if you have children, or if you are in a situation where you need life insurance, or if you have life insurance, screw your agent.

Screw that guy. He has nothing to do with you. You don't listen to him. Talk about a hundred Biden's emails for an hour and a half . So head over to red pill, revolution.co um, life insurance is seriously important guys. I know the first thing that happened to me when I had children was I realized my mortality.

I realized that, you know, when I die, life goes on, right? Um, you know, whatever debts you have, whatever mortgages you have, whatever bills you have on a consistent basis, the person that you love is counting on you to take care of them. And you can do that right now by going to red pill, revolution dot COO, and clicking on the button that says, get a quote.

um, takes two minutes to get a free quote. I had a $2 million policy offered to me. I think it was like $50 a month. It was crazy. It's awesome. Um, there's no, uh, it's like 95% approval rating. Um, it, you don't have to talk to anybody on the phone. Um, if you do have questions or you're in a state that's not offered, there's eight different states that you'll see on there.

If you're in a state, that's not offered, send me an email, Austin red pill, revolution.co. Um, and I will buy the state just for you, just for you. And I'd love to help you get some life insurance. Um, if you don't know what to get, I recommend getting a 15 year term policy at 15 times, the amount of your income, um, that should allow your spouse to basically have enough time to get on their feet, enough time to pay your bills to maybe purchase your home outright.

So they don't have that ongoing bill and do what's right for them. Do what's right for your children. Again, head over to red pill, revolution.co, get yourself some life insurance today. Again, it's the only way you can support this podcast besides going directly to the website and donating. All right. All right.

Cool. So let's go back to the Biden laptop emails from a conversation about doing what's right for your family. . Um, now the website for this again is Biden, laptop emails.com. Doesn't get any more straightforward than that. All right. So it says, here are 128,000 emails from the Biden laptop, which is the modern Rosetta stone of white and blue collar crime under the patina of the Delaware way.

Don't know what the hell that means. Um, it says prior to the discovery of the Rosetta stone, a number of ancient languages where mere gibberish and hash marks, similarly, the emails and hunter Bidens illuminated, uh, hunter Bidens, laptop illuminated previously convoluted webs of the people you are seeing, uh, the charge for global governance.

Truly the emails can be considered a translation tool for open source, intelligent gathering. Um, and this actually. References back to what that individual was talking about on Reddit, which is the O S N I OS I N T, which is what they referenced for how to properly translate these emails. Okay. Now what you can do on this website is you can search different individual terms.

Um, a few of that they recommend is, you know, the big guy now, some of the fun ones that I've done has been, um, you know, we'll just start off here and look at that comment, uh, pizza emails, cause I'm pretty sure, you know, that's an interesting topic when people want to talk about, uh, pizza gate and Hillary Clinton and you know, all of the shady, weird stuff that was going on there, um, seems to get a little bizarre.

All right. So here we go. This email is again from that shady figure. Eric swear. Schwerin Eric Schwerin. Um, Eric Swen sent him an email and this was on two, uh, March 30th, 2016 at approximately two 16. O'clock. Two 16 o'clock  two in the afternoon. Um, and it says presidential pizza, Mattie Beckwith, Ezekiel Emmanuel, Tony Poda, and Chris Petula are hosting a pizza party for Hillary Clinton next month, featuring campaign chair, John Podesta, senior policy advisor, Maya Harris and pizza chef James Avantis of comic ping pong, a maximum $27,000 contribution includes a special reception with John Podesta and all Clinton logo.

Haters need to check out this version, which has pepperoni pizza slices for the arrow. Now let's see if that works, cause it would be no surprise to me that Hillary Clinton has a pizza  in her logo. Now by clicking this link, I'm probably immediately sending five FBI agents to listen to this live stream on Reddit.

Ron TikTok, sorry. Oh yeah. Look at that link expired. Well, that's probably good for my behalf.  um, it goes on to say nothing, cuz that's the last of that email. Um, but there's several other references to comment ping pong, but I find that one to be the most interesting. Um, as far as the come ping pong situation goes, I don't know.

I just found that to be an interesting one to look up. Now, when we go look up illegal, you can start to see some of the shadier business deals of them talking about how not to do things illegally. Some of the interesting conversations that they have between these shell companies of Rosemont, Seneca of, uh, VDI V I D E was one that I recall that was a Chinese technology firm, which had no technology, um, just a shell company.

But if you search the term illegal, uh, it comes up with let's see how many pages, 23 pages, ages of emails. Now it is interesting to note, well, it's not really that interesting, but it's probably pertinent to note that some of these emails are just newsletters, um, like from, uh, but some of them are not like the morning score from political, um, other ones, uh, like this, a cheerful Biden family gamely fills in for his boss.

Um, and that's, again from Eric Sherwin, let's look up who this Eric Guy is because he's a shady character. Um, so Eric Sherwin, besides having a stupid name, um, let's see if we can find out who this guy actually is. So the New York post has a article, um, That says, who is Eric Swen? What to know about hunter Biden's business partner.

All right, now this goes on to say that Eric Sherwin CA became one of hunter. Biden's closest friends, business associates, and an emotional pillar to the Biden's troubled second son over the 20 year relationship that transformed the enigmatic money man into a DC power player. The 52 year old fixer who made at least 27 visits to the white house and other official venues during the Obama and Biden presidency is likely to be the focus of the looming Republican house probe into hunter Bidens, overseas business dealings while Swen Swen, Swen has not personally been accused of any wrongdoing.

Uh, his deep, personal and financial ties, both to Joe and hunter Biden. Continue to cast out on past claims about president Joe Biden, that he has no involvement in his son's business dealings, hunter Biden, and shrin. Uh, likely first met when they were worked in president bill Clinton's commerce department.

Sherin arrived at the agency in 1994 with a stir Sterling resume, having earned a bachelor's from the university of Pennsylvania and a master's from the Elliot school of international affairs at George Washington university. Before graduating, he spent a year in Czechoslovakia as an English teacher. He rose through the ranks quickly becoming an international trade specialist in 1997 before claiming the title of senior policy advisor to the secretary of an international trade in 1999.

And here's a lame picture of hunter Biden in a leather jumpsuit, taking a picture of himself with what seems to be a gin and tonic in an elevator in elevator mirror. Um, alright, cool buddy. Um, I worked with him in the department of commerce and I always found him to be a good and decent guy. A nice pleasant guy said former colleague.

Um, which they told the post, um, hunter Biden was the same age as Sherwin in fresh out of Yale law school, where he had one admission after president Clinton personally lobbied Dean Guido Calabresi to admit him after bouncing around some cushy banking gigs in Delaware, he landed at commerce as a policy director, specializing in the burgeoning internet company, according to the new Yorker, the pair headed off when George W.

Bush became president hunter Biden, left government and started a lobbying shop with William Oldaker, a DC lawyer who worked on his father. Uh, his father's aborted 1988 presidential campaign in 2002, shrin joined him and became a partner in the company. Lobbying disclosure forms shown here in 2008.

Senator Barack Obama sought more than 3.4 million in congressional earmarks for Hunter's clients. The Washington post reported at the time. He stayed with a lobbying firm until 2008 shady, shady business character. Here's another picture of Joe Biden or hunter Biden in an all white outfit, a yellowish  sweat stained shirt with some white pants.

with his face like this in his legs crossed like he's a GQ model. Um, I don't know. So this guy seems to be a shady character. Who's all over, all over, um, all over these emails, all over the shady business dealings with Rosemont, Seneca, all, all over. All of it. All right. I don't know, it seems a lot like you could really dive deep and find the correlations.

You know, I, I guess where you should start is looking at Rosemont Sanco, looking at the, um, Barisma deals that happened, looking at the China deals that happened where he was peddling, his father's influence. And you can go back, let's go back to that email list and see if we can find some, the big guy emails.

You know, if you've heard that before, you'll know what I'm talking about, but in these emails, hunter Biden, uh, refers to the big guy, right? And he refers to the big guy in these business dealings where he's basically peddling somebody's influence, um, to basically, uh, exchange conversations with his father, Joe Biden, with world leaders, uh, for profit and, uh, economic leaders and CEOs of companies for influence in exchange for hundreds of thousands of dollars per month in retainer fees.

Okay. Um, and we can look into these here. Now. There is 19 pages with the term, the big guy in it, right. And there's approximately, I don't know, 25, 30, 40, maybe 50 emails per page, and a ton of these have Eric Sherwin within them. Okay. Um, now if we go, this starts all the way back from 2010, uh, February 12th, 2010, he started peddling his, uh, dad's influence.

Um, interesting. His first email with Eric Sherwin was with in 2010 about the big guy. Um, let's see if we can find where this actually happened. Um, but basically what he ended up doing was giving a percentage of his companies, giving a percentage of these profitabilities through these corporations, to the big guy, the big guy, allegedly being Joe Biden, um, as he was exchanging his influence.

Uh, for these conversations. Now, when I went into these emails, I went like line by line, by line, by line, um, to see these actual shady business dealings. Now I, if I recall correctly, one of them was with Rosemont Seneca. Um, and we'll see if I can actually find the email where they had this laid out because they actually had it in a literal business, uh, dealing outline, like who is getting what percentage from where, um, and for what right.

And there's actual pictures that you can use to corroborate these emails, where you can look at the pictures. You can look at the emails and see the dates line up with pictures of Joe Biden, having golf outings with these CEOs of these companies, um, in exchange for putting his son on retainer, right? And this is where all the, the, the weirdness gets into play because hunter Biden was peddling.

His father's influence. Um, In Ukraine. Right. And all of these Ukrainian companies and a lot of them had to do with energy companies. Right. And so now when we're seeing Joe Biden give hundreds of like almost a hundred billion dollars now to Ukraine, it's like 70 billion at this point. Um, it, it all starts to make sense to me.

I mean, obviously I haven't taken a year, a piece of yarn and like connected every single dots, but it just seems super shady. Um, again, this is a podcast called red pill revolution. So take it with a grain of salt  um, but I think it's important to, to take a look at who he's talking to here. Right. I don't have time to go through all hundred and however, many thousand of these emails.

Um, but, uh, it seems to me that. They will eventually have people going through each one of them. And we will get that yarn string from company to company, to individual, to individual from Joe Biden, to Barisma from Barisma to China, from China to Zelensky and to Zelensky to, you know, so you get all of these hundreds of billions of dollars that they're gonna be Pedald to these companies over time.

Um, and eventually it all leads back to Joe Biden. Now, again, that's all a conspiracy. I don't know if what I'm saying is correct.  you can look at these emails for yourself, double check and see. Um, but to me it seems pretty shady that now we're sending billions of dollars to Ukraine after his son did billions of dollars of, of influence peddling to them over, you know, what appears to be 10 to 12 years through Rosemont, Seneca and his other show companies, um, shell companies.

And, uh, I don't know, pretty wild, but the other side of it, you know, there's like three categories of this when it comes to these text messages and it comes to the iCloud emails or the iCloud.  the first one is pedophilia, right? Let's just highlight each one of these categories for you.  the first side of it is him being super creepy and sexually inappropriate.

According to all of his family with Natalie Biden, who's his niece and potentially his daughter. According to that, I don't know. Um, the other side of it is super shady business dealings that were happening with Ukraine, Ukrainian energy companies and China. The other side of it is peddling his father's influence for profit through those companies.

The next part of it was his unbelievable amount of drug usage. And then the last part of it was allegedly sex trafficking that he's now being indicted for federal. Okay. Um, so again, you can check out the Reddit article directly for yourself by going and searching the topic title. So just search Reddit, the hunter Biden saga continues.

It's under the subreddit conspiracy. Of course. Um, you can find the emails for that at, uh, Biden, laptop emails, dot com. You can actually use every search term you could ever want in there to see use names, emails, individuals, illegal might be a good one to look at, um, pretty wild. Um, but I guess we all know that thingss gonna happen about this.

That's the most frustrating part is if I did this, or you did this, or your friend did this or anybody that we know every single one of us would be literally in jail right now. No questions asked now, obviously he's the son of the president of the United States. But that might change if hunter Biden is correct and he has cancer, if he's correct about his own medical status, which apparently the white house seems to believe that he's not.

But anyways, I did wanna just touch on each one of those categories for you guys. You gotta jump into this and, and dive in deeper if you'd like to, but I gave you the resources to do it. All right. Um, but anyways, I hope you guys have a great day. Thank you for listening. I appreciate it so much and welcome to the revolution.

Have a great day.

In this week's episode, we discuss 60,000 soldiers losing their pay and being striped of active status over not following the new "mandate", Former Prime Minister of Japan Shinzo Abe's assassin motive being related to a Japanese Cult, Ricky Martin facing 50 years in prison over his incestuous relationship with his nephew, the possible dark truth behind why Chris Pratt and Jack Carrs the Terminal List got bad reviews and Ivana Trump dying under very suspicious circumstances 

Subscribe and leave a 5-star review!

----more----

 Welcome to the revolution.

Hello, and welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams, and this is episode number 35 of the red pill revolution podcast. And again, thank you so much for joining me. We have some interesting updates, some pretty crazy. Breaking news events that have come out over the last, I don't know, 48 hours or so that we'll discuss.

Um, and we'll go over it all today. Um, and so what we're gonna discuss today is going to be the us army halting pay benefits and active status for 60,000 UN vaccinated garden reserve soldiers. We're also going to discuss Shinzo ABES assassin, forced to give up college after mother's $722,000 donation to unification church.

If you don't know who that is, that is the guy who is SA or the, uh, individual who assassinated the former prime minister of Japan. So quite interesting there, um, so it, they seem to be alluding to the fact that that $722,000 donation to the church somehow meant he was going to do this assassination or that he, that was the reason why I don't see exactly the correlation there, but we will jump into that.

We'll read through the article and discuss it. Another interesting point about that is how he actually did assassinate him and broad daylight with like a homemade pipe bomb. Gun some type of weird deal.  so we'll look at that. We're also gonna discuss, you know, all of these articles that have been coming out recently about England bracing for 40 Celsius temperatures as experts, warn thousands could die over, you know, and if you don't know what 40 Celsius is, it's 104 degrees Fahrenheit.

So not exactly sure how that equates to thousands of people dying because there's, you know, we'll get into it.  um, Ricky Martin was allegedly facing incest charges and could get up to 50 years in prison. Indoor mask mandates are coming back to LA county, which is hilarious to me, glad that is not, uh, somewhere that I live.

Um, the next thing is going to be is Lansky's office confirming that the us plans to train Ukrainian fighter pilots on F 15 and F 16 fighter jet.  and also, uh, that the white house confirming that Russian officials have, uh, visited Iran to see the drones that they were potentially talking about, uh, giving to Ukraine.

Um, we've seen some backlash on this recently about people talking badly about, you know, how re crazy it is. Biden did a speech on it. Uh, I believe it was like five days or, or so ago where he discussed how crazy and unbelievable it is that they would even have the audacity to consider giving weapons to a country, an war that isn't theirs.

Sounds familiar to me.  so we'll discuss that. Um, there is actually some interesting parts of the F 15 situation, which actually plays into why they're giving them those specifically. And it has to do with radar and, uh, NATOs, uh, capabilities with the radars that are on the F 15. So we'll discuss that as well.

Um, the next thing we'll talk about is IANA Trump dying from an accident, um, blunt impact injuries, uh, from a car accident. And that was from the New York, uh, city medical examiner. Terrible to hear that. Uh, we're also going to, uh, discuss the terminal list. If you haven't seen the terminal list, it's one of the best shows, uh, out there right now.

It's very, very, uh, interesting action pack show with Chris pat prat. And it's got some interesting reviews that we're going to discuss.  from the critics. I think there's like a 60 point difference on rotten tomatoes compared to what the audience thinks about it. Um, so we will discuss all of that and then last but not least, there were some, uh, conversations that went on in the Senate hearings, um, that I found to be pretty.

Interesting as well. So all of that's more stick around. We will try to hit all of those topics. We'll see how many we get to . Um, but thank you so much for listening. Go ahead and hit that subscribe button, leave a five star review. I appreciate you so much. Um, if you're watching on apple podcast, go ahead and subscribe to YouTube or rumble to watch the actual video feeds.

If you're already on both of those, you can actually head over to TikTok where I do a live every single week when I do the podcast and you can join me there. Um, and actually talk with me while we're going through this. So pretty cool. All right. So without further ado, episode number 35 of the red pill revolution podcast.

Welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams. Red pill revolution started out with me realizing everything that I knew, everything that I believed, everything I interpreted about my life is through the lens of the information I was spoon fed as a child, religion, politics, history, conspiracies, Hollywood medicine, money, food, all of it, everything we know was tactfully written to influence your decisions and your view on reality by those in power.

Now I'm on a mission, a mission to retrain and reeducate myself to find the true reality of what is behind that curtain. And I'm taking your ass with me. Welcome. To the revolution.

All right. Episode number 35 of the red pill revolution podcast. And again, thank you so much for joining me. I appreciate it. So, so much now this next, uh, topic of conversation, the very first article that we're gonna discuss today is going to be the 60,000 soldiers who are losing not only their benefits, but also their pay for not following the mandate, which I find to be atrocious in infuriating.

Um, a former military veteran myself, uh, could not imagine having raised my right hand and committing my life to, you know, defend our government and, you know, the United States against enemies, both foreign and domestic only to eventually, uh, get my pay taken away from me for not wanting to follow a mandate, um, about my own body.

uh, so I find that to be interesting. Let's go ahead and read this article. It says us army halting pay benefits and active status for 60,000 unvaccinated guard and reserve soldiers. It goes on to say that soldiers who refuse the order without an approved or pending exemption request are subject to adverse administrative actions, including flags, bars to service and official reprimands said an army spokesperson.

It goes on to say that the us army has cut around 40,000 national guardsmen and 22,000 reservists from service and pay, uh, for refusing to get their job. The service members were given a deadline that ended on Thursday to receive the vaccine. The figure makes up around 13% of the national guardsman and 12% of reservists.

So that would be, you know, a total between the two of those of 25% of our total military force in the guards and reserves, which is terrifying, terrifying, especially if you consider the fact that we're in one of the very first hot wars among other countries, other countries, you know, saying that with quotations  and the reason I'm doing that is because if we followed along from the very beginning, this is just a proxy.

This is absolutely just a proxy war between the United States and Russia over Ukraine. And you see that, you know, if we , we'll do it on the next episode, I'm really interested about diving into that. But the, the hunter Biden phone that got leaked, um, I went down a huge rabbit hole last night and basically read through a bunch of different emails.

Um, you can actually find a website, but we'll go over all of that. But there's a huge correlation between the Biden family Ukraine and what is actually happening in Russia today. So this is, don't get it confused. This is not a war between Zelensky and Putin. This is a proxy war between NATO and the UN and Vladimir Putin, um, not wanting Ukraine to be a part of it.

And us, you know, if giving billions and billions and billions of dollars to Ukraine to fight a war that isn't even ours. Um, so in the middle of that, in the midst of that, in the midst of us, deciding to give tanks to Taiwan and also interjecting billions tens of billions of dollars to Ukraine in the war, that's not even ours inciting one of the world's largest nuclear superpowers.

We're also going to cut 25% of our fighting force in the middle of all that for making their own bodily decisions about their medical status. It makes absolutely no sense. Now what this article goes on to say is we are in the midst of a recruiting crisis in the army. This is for one of the first times ever this year, they did not meet their quotas in recruiting.

They are having a very, very difficult time recruiting individuals to Joe Biden's military. Okay. Now one can only imagine why in the midst of all this crisis and, and the lack of leadership and the weak, um, you know, the, the weak president that we see in office that they would be defending against. Um, but also I think a lot of people are just waking up to the military industrial complex.

Right? I, I, I think it's probably a mix of things. I mean, obviously a lot of people, right. Still what, 40, 35% or 40 of people, 35% or so of people don't quote me on that. It's probably wrong  but a good percentage of people are still UN vaccinated and, you know, a good percentage of people who are willing to go into the military are primarily.

Going to be, you know, your more right leaning, younger individuals, and those individuals are, have no reason to get vaccinated and generally have a philosophical belief that they don't want to be, which is causing a, you know, difficulty in the recruiting process, uh, where, you know, not only are they maybe not approving of the current state of our governmental administration, but also not approving of, you know, the barrier to entry to have, to, you know, jab themselves with a experimental, uh, gene therapy.

Uh, so that seems to be all coming together to cause a very difficult crisis in the midst of probably the worst time ever, when we're the closest to like, don't get this confused. We are the closest to a world war than we have been since 1942. So, you know, the fact that now we're dealing with this, the fact that now we're dealing with a crisis in recruiting is terrifying and it should terrify you too.

Especially when we're, you know, later on what we're gonna discuss arming the enemies of one of the world's largest superpowers. Um, It it's quite concerning. So the Army's doing a couple things to try and combat this recruiting issue. The first thing that they're doing is, uh, you know, making it so that you can show tattoos on your hands and on your wrist.

we'll see how many people with, uh, wrist tattoos are going to help with the 13 to 25% of people that they're getting rid of in the army currently. And then the other one was going to be, there was one more thing. Oh, just this little thing called a G E D that you no longer have to have to go into the army.

Hmm. Now this sounds a lot like an intentional, uh, purposeful way of taking our military, the strongest military the world has ever seen ever, and dwindling it down to a bunch of, uh, individuals who are uneducated by bringing in people who don't have GEDs. Who don't, you know, maybe have the, the, um, general political leanings that we see within the military.

Right? You know, you, you survey the military, I'm sure we can find statistics on this, but you will generally find that the average military individual is not going to be hyper liberal Antifa members. Um, wonder why, but that's what you're gonna find. And so when you see that all come together, we're finding these recruiting issues coming into place.

And at the very same time, the us army is now literally not firing them, not get, not allowing them to, you know, get a discharge. They're just not paying them. They're just. Giving them official reprimands and bars of service. So it it's, it's puzzling to me, it seems, you know, with all of these things coming together, not only making the average IQ in the military, go down immediately after passing the fact that you don't have to have a G E D anymore to go into the military

And then also the fact that you have to get vaccinated and they're getting rid of 60,000 soldiers pay now, what does that do to morale? Right? Not only just these 60,000 people, but also the fair, the friends of these individuals, right? The, the, how many people do these 60,000 people know within the military that are now gonna be frustrated that their buddy down the hall who's done nothing wrong and has dedicated his life to his service in the military is now not getting paid by the very employer that they have.

Right. Because what's next? What are they gonna decide not to pay their soldiers for after that? Um, and that would probably concern me if I was still in the military. All right. Um, now the next thing is going to be Shinzo Abe's assassin. Now Shinzo Abe is the former Japanese prime minister. And this individual was assassinated.

I believe it was about a week and a half ago, um, by a younger individual with a, you know, makeshift pipe gun that he made at home, looked like a piece of wood with like two, uh, metal barrels down the middle of it that he like electrical taped that them together. Um, but basically goes on to say, I don't know if this is a, you know, it doesn't seem to be a motive, you know, maybe unless he's just saying, you know, uh, fuck it all.

And going after a large, I, I don't know. It doesn't make sense how this correlates to the actual assassination, but it's interesting to note nonetheless, um, Shinzo Abe's assassin forced to give up college after mother's $722,000 donation to the unification church. And that came from his uncle. This is on Yahoo news.

It goes the uncle of Shinzo, Abe suspected shooter Tetsuya Yamagami stated that Yamagami's mother had donated approximately 100 million yen or $721,000 to the unification church leading to the family's alleged financial ruin. Now I think there's probably been a lot of people in the history of men who have seen financial ruin and not, I don't know, murdered and assassinated a high level official or prime minister.

Um, but you know, nonetheless doesn't make much sense to me how the correlation there, but it goes on to say that on Friday, the uncle who was a 77 year old, older brother of his father shared that Yamaha's mother first joined the church in 1991, after her husband's suicide in 1984, she made multiple donations to the religious group through her time as a devoted.

Or a devoted member, sorry. It sounds like she is far more of a voted member than a devoted mother.  with $722,000 going to your church and making it so that your son can no longer go to college. Um, now it goes on to say that despite becoming bankrupt in 2002, she continued giving to the church, albeit in smaller amounts under the principle of world peace and unification  I believe she was a very important follower of the church.

And the uncle said that he even believes that she was under mind control. He added that the family was thrown into poverty and Yama gamy was forced to give up college due to financial ruin. And again, that is the assassin of the late and now formally dead, uh, prime minister of Japan. The church official stated that a news conference on Monday, that it had no direct relationship to Abe, although it did with other lawmakers through an affiliated organization, it also insisted that it had returned five or 50 million yet, or $360,000 back to her while claiming there were no records of her donations to the organization.

Hmm. I don't see how you can simultaneously say that you never donated. And then also give me $360,000 back . And I think this is like, if, if, if you really dive into this and you see, you know, what, what is the impact of this, right. I, I'm not very familiar with Japanese politics or politicians. Um, but what I think it is an interesting insight into is the, you know, Japan doesn't have readily, easily access to weapons that we do here in the United States.

And everybody says, just ban the guns, right? Ban the guns. We don't need those things. If we get rid of the guns, all of the, you know, uh, all of the criminals in the world are just gonna stand in line and they'll never shoot anybody ever again, even if, you know, and, and so what we see here is he didn't have access to a weapon.

He didn't have access to a AR 15 assault rifle  and still somehow managed to take two pipes, electrical tape around them and shoot somebody two times and killed them in the middle of the street. So. Hmm do with that information, what you will. But to me, it shows me that where there's a will, there's a way whether it's a, uh, uh, AR 15, whether it's a Glock, whether it's a knife, whether it's a vehicle running through a parade, I dunno, who am I?

Just a guy  but, um, it does seem to me like that $722,000 is being alluded to being the reason why, or some type of motivation around why he actually committed this assassination. Uh, but again, I don't see, you know, a lot of other people who have gone into financial ruin just randomly assassinating prime ministers.

So now the next article that we're gonna go into is England bracing for 40 Celsius or 104 Farah and high temperatures. And them saying that experts are warning that thousands could die. England says a level for heat alert for the next week means illness and death may occur among the fit and the healthy.

Hmm. I find that to be interesting because 40 degrees Celsius is 104 degrees Fahrenheit. Now, if you live anywhere in the Western side of the United States or like Arizona, it's 112 degrees today,  in Arizona. Um, I don't see a bunch of fit and healthy young individuals dying on the streets because it's 110 degrees.

Now, England is saying that because of this illness and death may occur among the fit and healthy. Now, what would cause young fit and healthy individuals to randomly fall dead on the streets due to a hundred degree temperatures? Hmm. Maybe that's a better question that we should be asking because primarily there are far, far more hot countries in the world.

Go. to The desert, go to Egypt, go to Africa.  and what you're gonna find is that people aren't even the old and, you know, unhealthy are not just randomly dying when it's over a hundred degrees, Fahrenheit just doesn't happen. Especially when in modern culture you have in England, an apartment, usually with air conditioning, usually , there's no reason that you should be dying from a hundred degrees, right.

Even where I'm at, where it. Not 110 degrees, but around a hundred degrees at some point this summer people weren't just randomly dying on the streets because of it. It makes no sense. But this goes on to say that because of the coming heat wave experts have warmed as the government triggered the very first ever national emergency heat, red alert with a record of 104 degree temperature forecast for Southeast England on Tuesday.

Um, they say that there could be caused about 1600 excess deaths according to official figures. The level four heat alert announced for Monday and Tuesday by the UK health security agency means illness and death may occur among the fit and healthy and not just high risk groups. I'm pretty sure if you look around the United States today, you go to your weather app on your phone.

You're gonna find that there's a ton of states, a ton of cities around our country, where it is above 104 degrees right now today. And again, nobody's just dropping dead on the side of the road because it's a hundred degrees out.  I don't know if maybe people in Europe have different genes Um, but you know, growing up around an area that snows a lot, I lived in Florida and it was 110 degrees and I wore, you know, army camo and, you know, had my pants tucked into my boots and marched miles and miles and miles and miles at the time in boot camp.

And didn't fall over and die because it was a hundred degrees out. Now the military does actually take into consideration these, you know, heat indexes, but you know, they're not pausing the entirety of the military so that nobody dies off of 104 degrees.  it just seems odd to me that young and fit individuals are not only gonna die from the heat, but also illness.

Um, which may. I don't know. I wonder, I wonder what the real cause is behind this one can only imagine now the, the next thing we'll touch on this quickly, I find this just to be a, you know, quick little pop culture deal going on right now. Um, something that, uh, I don't know, speaks to where our society is, but anyways, Ricky Martin allegedly faces 50 years in prison over incest charges with his nephew.

Hmm. Some shocking new developments in the Ricky Martin case have been revealed. It was previously reported that Ricky who is 50 was subject of a domestic abuse restraining order that was filed in Puerto Rico. The police attempted to issue the restraining order, but were unable to locate him at the time the accuser's name was kept secret.

And Ricky also spoke out to deny the allegations. Now the accuser has been revealed and shocking new details were en revealed and a new report. Now the individual that he did this with is his nephew. And I don't have all of the information on it, but it seems to me that. Well, here we go. So it says that he was alleged that there was a physical and psychological abuse.

And that is from Dennis, who was his, um, the report alleged that Dennis ended a seven month relationship with Ricky and the singer did not take it well consistently reaching out to him and loitering outside his home. You would think Ricky Martin, with all of his, you know, I don't know, fame, celebrity money status would probably not be standing outside of people's homes, looking to, I don't know, or even just being in an incestuous relationship to begin with, but this is what happens when every single front page of every single porn site ever has something to do with incest.

I think, I think that's a weird thing, right? I think in our culture, like you go to all of the, and maybe that's the reason for like the. Prevalency today of like only fans and all these, you know, little, um, more content creator focused, you know, porn industry type deals is the, the, the industry in itself, like the big, I guess you could call it like the porn industrial complex  seems to lean quite towards like the things that are, um, you know, morally wrong, right?

Like not only is it enough to, to put, put porn on the internet, but also to make every single video ever about a stepmom, a stepsister, a, you know, whatever you wanna call it. Um, but the prevalency of that in the highest echelons of our entertainment industry, you know, things like game of Thrones and which I guess is based in reality, because back then insist.

Kind of a fairly consistent thing, but yes, Ricky Martin,  apparently in an incestuous relationship with his nephew and is now facing 50 years in prison. And his nephew is 21 years old. Ricky Martin is 50 years old, which means if he was Ricky Martin was his nephew's father. He would've been 30 when he had him.

Hmm that's first of all, disgusting. Second of all, gross that it's incestuous and third of all is just wrong. 30 year difference in age. And it also so happens to be your own blood. Hmm. So let's, uh, hope that Ricky Martin gets what he deserves. Um, but it's also interesting that you can actually, like where is this happening?

Puerto Rico is where it actually happened. Yeah, I guess we'll have to see what comes out with that. It goes on to say at the end of this article, that the allegations against Ricky Martin that led to a protection order are completely false and fabricated. His representatives said previously, of course they did.

We are very confident that when the true facts come out in this matter, our client, Ricky Martin will be fully vindicated. Hmm. Well, let's hope the best for Ricky Martin's nephew. Although I guess sounds like it was a consensual relationship, so you're both wrong and you're both gross. Now the very next thing is going to be the indoor mask mandate imminent in LA county.

In this article by Fox 11 in Los Angeles, goes on to say that Los Angeles county remains on pace to enter a high COVID activity level. As early as Thursday, the public health director said, and absent and absent, a major reversal and virus related hospitalizations, an indoor mask where a mandate will be imposed two weeks later.

The county is already in the medium COVID level as defined by the us centers for disease control. Based on the elevated rate, uh, rate people are being infected with the virus. I didn't even know this was still around. Right. I thought, I thought everybody was over it. I thought we were focused on the, the Ukraine virus and then the, you know, Johnny de virus.

And then the, you know, apparently this is, uh, coming back now. Um, but no surprise. I wonder if there's probably like a bunch of people who just have slept in their mask for two and a half years now and just are so excited that everybody else now has to wear their. You know, I haven't been to LA in a w a while, a few years, but I can only imagine there's a large group of people, just so excited that they finally get to wear the color coded mask outfits that they spend so much money on during the pandemic.

Um, but this is literally meaning that businesses, businesses are mandated to now make you wear a mask. Again, this is what caused, you know, fist fights in home depots. This is what caused, you know, all of the, um, escalating tensions over the last several years was a lot to do with the mask mandates, right?

People felt like they had the right to scream and yell at you over you not putting something on your own body to allegedly protect yourself. And, you know, even Fauci came out again and said the mask that we were using, weren't effective EV on top of the fact that he originally said that mask in general just aren't effective, right?

But the science changes day by day in this world, you know, besides the one that tells you that, you know, a man can be a woman and a woman can be a man and nobody gets to tell you otherwise, Even if you have a penis or vagina. So, um, crazy the world that we live in, but this goes on to say, as of Tuesday, the rate was 8.8 per hundred thousand residents, public health director, Barbara fairer echoing projections.

She gave last night, told the board of supervisors Tuesday that she expects the county to enter high activity category within days. Um, now it says she, again, pointed to recent studies showing dramatic reduction in infection for risk when people who wear face coverings, particularly for those who wear N 90 fives and K and 90 fives, uh, master are already still mandated in some indoor spaces in LA, such as healthcare facilities, transit hubs, and on transit vehicles, airports, correctional facilities, and shelters, uh, universal mandate would spread the requirement to all indoor public spaces, including shared office spaces, manufacturing facilities, retail stores, indoor events, indoor restaurants, bars, and schools.

Hmm. That's terrible to hear we're going literally backwards now. Right? And, and this is the thing about a V risk. A virus doesn't go away. It's not just gonna die off and we're never gonna hear the name. COVID again, this is gonna be around for a while. And what we've seen is that when people stop talking about it, it seemingly doesn't exist in the world of a lot of people, because you know where, where we're seeing the biggest hype about it being through news and that news and causing things like this coming up, you know, but again, this LA glad it's not in our country.

it's its own little islands that, that loves their masks. Um, so I'm sure they won't piss off too many people, but my hope is that this does not spread across the us. Um, now the very next thing, and this is actually coming off of, I'm sure some people at Starbucks are happy because Starbucks just decided to pull out of LA.

They pulled out like Seattle, Seattle, they pulled out of Portland, Oregon. They pulled out of all of these like hyper liberal states, um, because it was, uh, violent and dangerous in these areas. Um, who'd have thought that, uh, but just thought it as a little side note on here. So I thought I'd mentioned that  now, um, the next article we're gonna discuss is Lansky's office confirming us plans to train Ukrainian fighter pilots on F 15 F 16 fighter jets.

So we will discuss that in just a second, but the next thing I needed to do is listen up. All right. I do not have any advertising on this podcast. I do not have any third parties. Nobody pays me to do this. It's me sitting here spending my time, doing this with you guys, sitting here with you, and nobody pays me to do paid advertisements.

But what I do do to monetize my podcast is I do offer life insurance. Now everybody's been, you know, crazy about, you know, packing up on food and crazy about, you know, the, the end of our economy and all of this stuff going on and, uh, trying to prepare for those things. Now that may happen, but. May is a key word, seems to be every day, we're getting closer and closer to, you know, a recession.

If we're not already there yet, which a lot of people on one particular side seem to be denying, but one thing that you can do, and one thing that you can know for sure is going to happen is you're gonna die maybe today, maybe tomorrow, maybe next year. I hope it's not. I hope it's, you know, 55 years from now, depending on your age, but you're gonna hap it's gonna happen to you.

You're gonna die. If you're married. If you have children, if you have somebody who depends on you for your income, you should absolutely have health insurance. You should absolutely even more so have life insurance. Because if you have debts, if you have a home, if you have rent and that person that you are responsible for taking care of cannot afford to live on their own, you need to take care of them.

And you can do that right now by going to red pill, revolution.co and clicking a little button that says, get a. Normally, when you sign up to get life insurance, you get a hundred different calls from a hundred different people, and it's the most annoying ass thing you could ever imagine. All of these people texting you at all times of the night, but you don't get that with this.

You can actually do it all online by yourself. You don't have to talk to me. You don't have to talk to anybody else. Go to red pill, revolution.coo.com is for losers and sign up for some life insurance. What I recommend getting, if you don't know already, what you want is a 15 year term policy at 15 times, the amount of your annual salary.

And I would appreciate it so much. That's the only way that I make anything off of this podcast is if you sign up at that link at red pill, revolution dot COO, protect your assets, protect your family, and go ahead and get some life insurance, right? Because the last thing you wanna do is, you know, leave your family with a bunch of debt.

All right. That's all I got. The next article that we're gonna discuss  is going to be Zelenskyys office confirming that the us plans to train Ukrainian fighter pilots on F 15 and F 16 fighter jets, which I find to be interesting about three to five days ago, we saw a lot of news coming out of, uh, talks between Iran and Russia with Iran, uh, allegedly talks to give Russia a bunch of drone.

And that sparked Biden getting on, uh, the microphone and fumbling through a sentence about how he basically thought it was wrong, that anybody should be, uh, you know, funding a war that wasn't theirs. And , I don't know if that was his exact words, but it seemed quite hypocritical when we're spending billions and billions and billions of dollars funding, a war that is not ours by sending them like, literally your, your buddy's in a fist fight and you throw him a knife and allow him to stab the guy and expect the other guy's buddy over there, not to give him a knife.

If he had one, like, it makes no sense that they're so hypocritical with this, you know, what do you expect if you're gonna spend 60, $70 billion sending, you know, Lord knows. Over to Ukraine to give to Lord knows who, right? I mean, I think we do know who, when that comes into con context, right? When we talk about the new, um, leaks from hunter Biden's cell phone, which is going to be the very next episode, I believe that we will do is going to be a deep, deep dive into what actually came in that leak 456 gigabytes of data of hunter Bidens, 126,000 emails, pictures from, you know, all sorts of sexual escapades and drug use and his, uh, uh, underage niece who he allegedly had a, uh, sexual relationship with.

Um, I don't know, all sorts of crazy stuff came out of that. But another thing that came outta that was those email. From his account at Rosemont Seneca Rosemont Seneca was hunter Biden's investment firm that basically did a bunch of shady energy deals in Ukraine. Um, give, uh, peddling his father's influence through companies like Barisma.

Um, I, I was reading last night. I dove like deep into this. That's why we're not doing it today is cause I have more to look into to it before I put it together for you guys. Um, but it's pretty wild. Um, all of the connections between corporations, all of the things, all the changes of money between Ukraine and the United States, the Biden family and Ukraine, um, China, all of it.

So it it's, it's pretty wild. Um, but anyways, $60 billion getting sent to Ukraine, we don't have. Clue where it's actually going. But what we do know, and what's come out recently is going to be the fact that, uh, Ukraine basically was peddling. You know, they've been pushing out these weapons, like they there's been like a, a backdoor exchange of money where, um, these weapons have been found in other countries now.

So basically we're sending hundreds of like 60 billion over to Ukraine and tons of tons of weapons and, you know, talking about showing their fighter pilots, how to fly F fifteens and F sixteens. And then also, you know, they're sending the same weapons out the door, the back door and, and profiting from them that way as well.

Hmm, who'd have thought. Um, so I find that to be interesting, but let's go ahead and read this. And there's a reason that the F 15 is actually specifically important in this. It's not just the fact that, and I, and I think that the UN has come out and said that they will not supply the F 15 S I wonder how many F 15 S Ukraine had before this engagement

Um, but apparently they're gonna be, um, training their fighter pilots on how to use them. And again, so we'll read this article real quick, and then we'll go back to actually why the F 15 is actually important because there's a specific reason why it's not just the fighting capabilities it actually has to do with the radar system that attaches, um, that can connect with NATO.

Um, so that's one of the reasons, and we'll discuss what that actual radar system is. But this article goes on to say that Lansky's office confirms us plans to train Ukrainian fighter pilots on F 15 and F 16 fighter jets earlier. Uh, let's see. So as according to the journalist, part of the amount should go to Ukrainian fighter pilots of the $840 billion.

Defense policy bill that was passed from the us house. Oh my gosh. That's a lot of money. According to the U the journalist part of the amount should go to training Ukrainian fighter pilots. I wonder if that's supposed to be million, uh, 840 billion. Oh my gosh. And this is coming from Yahoo news. So I can't imagine they had that big of a typo.

Um, but according to the journalist part of this amount should go towards training the fighter pilots. The United States plans to train Ukrainian fighter pilots of the F 15 and F 16 fighter jets. This amendment to the us fiscal year 2023 defense funding bill was supported by the house of representatives.

A total of 100 million is planned to be allocated for this in turn political scientists and publicist Andre pian. Toski believes that this is an indirect confirmation that Ukraine will get us fighter jets as military aid to defend Russia. However, it is still difficult to say when exactly this may happen.

I believe they've come out and said like the UN has come out and said specifically that they're not going to, like, they have an unofficial agreement not to actually send the fighter jets over to Ukraine. We'll see how long that goes. Um, but so the, the actual specific reason that this is important, and I saw this from, uh, conversation on Reddit discussing this thread, where they went into the actual reason why this is important.

Um, so let's read what that is. Somebody talks about it being a specific reason due to the radar. Usage. Um, but this actually goes on to say that, um, let's read the first comment first, which says Ukraine will need replacement systems for almost all of their Soviet era equipment. Eventually Russia. Sure.

Won't sell them anything. The F 16 is the logical replacement for their aging MIG 20 nines. It's tried and tested technology, which is well suited for Ukraine's current needs. They don't need some deep strike stealth jet. They need something reliable to protect their own airspace. Maybe training fire pilots will make a while, will take a while, but waiting until all their MIG 20 nines are either shot down or simply won't fly.

Do the lack of spare parts might not be the prudent thing to do. Maybe, uh, they won't get F sixteens, but it's good thinking to at least have the option rather than being out of options. Now, um, this is the part that I find to be most interesting. This says it might be mentioned else. And I'll get buried anywhere, but the real capability leap here is that these airframes are designed to network with NATO radars in a way that the aircraft currently in Ukraine's inventory are not those big, old flying radars are quite handy for blowing things away over the horizon.

Not going to be pretty for our Russian friends. Um, it says it's called data link. So that's the actual radar type that is allowing the NATO individuals to be able to utilize the radar facilities or the radar data that's gonna be coming from these F fifteens. Um, so it says that it's called data link and it's basically like playing with cheat codes on if there's an are AWAC in the sky or a, any friendly planes, all sharing sensor data amongst each other.

So it's basically going to allow them to see their airspace much more clear to see who's around, um, and how to actually properly approach it from the airspace perspective, um, by having the F 15. So it's not just the fighting capabilities, right? It's not just the fact that they can now, you know, go up against the fighter jets of Russia.

It's actually that they can utilize the radar facilities and the radar capabilities of the F 15, um, to now fight back with that data.  so I thought that to be interesting right now, it, I still think it's funny. The hypocrisy that came out of this between, uh, Ukraine getting all of the $60 billion and Biden specifically funding it.

Um, and then him coming out and, you know, uh, critiquing Iran for even considering the fact that they might give drones to Russia. It's like, what do you expect? Right. Everybody has allies. And when you have half the world funding, this war between a large nuclear superpower and Ukraine, which is basically a subsidiary of the UN and the United States by proxy, um, what do you expect?

They have their own allies who are going to funds them, right? Like I said, if there was a fist fight that happened in the bar between your buddy and then some random guy and you throw him a knife, don't be surprised when his buddy throws him a knife or even a gun. Right. Like it's kind of expected here.

Um, so I think that's interesting. I think it'll be. Um, interesting to see if we actually do supply the F 15 S I don't know why they wouldn't at this point with the way that, you know, we've funded, basically the entirety of this war. You go look at the list of people who have sent money to Ukraine, and it's like, the United States has sent like 70 billion.

If this article's right. That number went from 70 billion to like 840 billion. I don't think that's correct though. Um, I believe it was million is what they meant to say. Um, so Yahoo knows if you need an editor, gimme a shout, I'll help you out. Uh, but  now the next thing that we're gonna go into is going to be a terminal list.

Now, if you don't know what terminal list is, terminal list is the number one show on Amazon prime right now. And it's a show about a Navy seal. It's actually from a book written by, um, uh, Carr. I forget his first name. I'll look at, well, no, here in just a second, when I start this video. Um, but. It's a book called determinist and Chris Pratt is the lead in this show.

And, uh, it's about a Navy seal and there'll be a little bit of spoiler alerts here. So if you're in the middle of watching the first to three or four episodes, maybe the first three episodes, you know, skip ahead maybe a couple minutes.  um, but, uh, basically it's about a Navy seal who has his family spoil alert, right?

3, leave 2, seriously 1, okay fine his family get murdered. Sorry. If you're still listening to this, his family gets murdered and he finds out that he has a brain tumor and his entirety of his Navy seal team gets murdered in a, uh, mission that they were on. And he finds out that it was due to a corporation that was basically giving soldiers medication that was supposed to help block their PTSD.

And that gave him a brain tumor. And in order to try and wipe the slate clean and, you know, not have anybody come out and speak out against this drug, that's basically happening between, you know, being sold to these businesses. Um, they, you know, basically kill all of the Navy seals and try to. Them off. So there's no evidence.

Okay. There's the premise. Now the company that is the one that funded the pharmaceutical medications is like a big, huge conglomerate that owns every company ever. And just does these investment deals between them. And this is where it gets interesting. So rotten tomatoes gave a rating to the terminal list of like a 30% rating, which if, you know, route and tomatoes and you follow the actual rating systems, um, usually falls pretty in line.

At least in some cases with the audience score. In this case, the audience gave it like a 95% rating, 96%, I think last time I checked and, uh, we'll talk about why that's interesting and what might be the cause behind that. But first we'll actually look at the author talking on Fox news to Tucker Carlson around what he believes, uh, is going on there and why.

And here we go. Big of Amazon, pretty cool that they made it. Terminal list is based of course, on a bestselling book by Jack Carr. He's one of the executive producers. He's a former Navy seal, one of the best selling novelists in America. One of the good guys, Jack Carr. Thanks so much for coming on. So it must play.

It must plea. First of all, congratulations on the book, the many books, this, um, show, but it must please you in a way, not all viewers hate it or not. All critics hate it, but viewers like it much more than critics. How do you feel about. Oh, it, it, uh, falls right in line with everything, uh, that I understand about the current culture and climate in America right now.

And it seems to have triggered quite a few of these critics. And I have a couple examples here, daily beast titled their review. The terminal list is an unhinged right wing revenge fantasy, which is odd because right left conservative, liberal are not even mentioned in the show, but, uh, I think it may be because the protagonist is competent with, uh, weapons and tactics.

He's strong. He holds those in power accountable, uh, and that could be unsettling for some particularly some maybe senior members of the military who have failed upwards over the last 20 years. Uh, they go on to write, there is some serious danger to the terminal list, pandering to red state viewers with routine references to beer, guns, country music.

and hunting. Uh, the daily beast does not like those things. It does not sound like it is much fun over there, but the, uh, the 95%, uh, viewer rating audience rating makes it all worth it. We didn't make it for the critics. Uh, we made it for those in the arena. We made it for the soldier, sailor, airman, and Marine that went down range to Iraq and Afghanistan.

So they could sit on the couch and say, Hey, these guys put in the work, they put in the effort to make something special and make a show that speaks, uh, speaks to them. And that 95% rating lets me know that we at least got close. And then, uh, one more line here. It's from TV line. It says the fugitive meat seal team meets a don't tread on meat truck decal, where served up huge helpings of red meat, masculinity, and lots and lots of American flags.

They don't like American flags over there game, uh, rant, even sites, rev, revolutionary war era. Don't tread on me flags as a negative. So it's odd that both game rants and TV line had to go back to the 17 hundreds to take the side of the British in their reviews. I found the. I thought that was hilarious.

The, they had to go back to take the side of the British, because the meets that don't tread on me thing. I don't know. I thought that was funny. So what this is, again, this is a, a conversation between, uh, Jack Carr. Who's the writer of the terminal list, discussing why he believes it got the ratings that he did.

Now. He discusses a little bit in there, which is challenging the powers that be in large corporate organizations. And that is exactly why I think rotten tomatoes gave this the rating that it has. And I think it has a lot more to do with who owns rotten tomatoes and the similarities between the types of things that that company does.

And. What's actually going on in this show here, which I find to be interesting. Um, but again, we'll discuss that in one more minute. We have 20, 30 seconds left in this clip and then we'll continue on and discuss the actual reason why I think the terminal list is getting the ratings that it is because I think it's a lot deeper than what Jack car is actually alluding to here at, uh, quite telling

But uh, someone wrote a, a horrible review of one of my latest novel in the blood. And they said, uh, something along the lines of what, what do you even call a book like this? And, uh, you call it a, a number one New York times bestselling novel. And someone wrote the same thing about this show. And, uh, you call that the number one series on prime video.

All right. So that is all we will listen to on that. Now, here is my theory around why I believe that the terminal list got the ratings that it did. Now, if you know the show of the terminal list, it's about a corporate, a large owning corporate investment company that invests in smaller companies who. Is the powers that be right, the deep state and what ends up happening here is the same type of company that they're alluding to causing these soldiers deaths that this man is going after  is the same one that owns rotten tomatoes.

If you know who rotten tomatoes is owned by its Comcast, okay. Now Comcast is not the big, bad Wolf. I'm sure in some senses it might be, but who is, is who owns Comcast, right? And you usually have to go two levels high because they have some type of hierarchy here. So the owner of Comcast is I want you to take a guess starts with a black and then's with the rock

And the other highest owner of Comcast is Vanguard. So the same companies that are a part of the military industrial complex, a part of the pharmaceutical industry, a part of the same people who are testing drugs on our military members also, so happens to own the critiquing companies.  that critique the movies that this show is talking about, these same type of organizations.

So I think the reason that this got critiques, that it did the reason that these critics are going after the terminal is a, not only the fact that Chris Pratt is basically the only conservative that's out there. Um, but B the fact that BlackRock and Vanguard are the very companies that this fictional book is alluding to having these types of powers and doing these types of things.

Now, if you were the owner of BlackRock in Vanguard, and you wanted to eliminate the possibility that the general population wakes up to the idea that there's large conglomerate, multi national, multi trillion dollar companies owned by royalty and old, old money and the Rothchilds and all these, you know, deep state individuals and George Soros of the world, those same individuals are the ones that this show is talking about going after for doing the types of things that these very companies like BlackRock and Vanguard do.

They own the pharmaceutical companies, they owned the, the movie CRI critics. They owned the, the companies that, uh, actually released the films. And in this case, they weren't able to get their hands on it, which, you know, to me is in some way telling of, uh, you know, I guess it is on Amazon. So maybe, you know, Amazon is actually also owned by BlackRock.

So maybe that's an easy, uh, way of saying that maybe not the case, but it seems to me like this absolutely has to be a hit job on the idea that this is, this show is pushing, which is that there's these large monopoly companies that own everybody and everything. And they literally assassinate people for profit, which we, 100% can conclude happens in the world.

Right. For if you are that naive that you don't think corporations are killing people so that they can continue the profit, whether in one way or another directly with assassinations, um, or. By, you know, just poisoning the general population, both physically and mentally with the types of, you know, propaganda that they push, um, then you are naive, but I think that's the real reason.

I also think another reason that they're going after Chris Pratt is because he's literally the only conservative ish type of actor in Hollywood and this move movie or show has to do with guns and weapons. And like he said, hunting and all of these, you know, um, what is that? Revenge porn, uh, conservative extreme, right wing ideas like hunting  um, so apparently that just rubbed the critics the wrong way, but I think it more so has to do with who actually owns rotten tomato.

Which is Comcast, which is owned by black rock and Vanguard. Um, so there's my theory. Take it or leave it, but you should go watch the terminal list. I think it's a really interesting, you know, I think it's probably some of Chris Pratt's best acting, you know, which maybe, you know, generally speaking, he's not the greatest, you know, method actor in the world  but he seems to have taken this very seriously.

And what Jack car does in this show that I appreciate is he talks about how they took a specific aim in this show, wanting to go about it in a way that the veterans, the special forces individuals that are out there that have conducted these missions, watch it and go, yes, that is exactly, you know, how I think that would play down the tactics that they use, the, you know, the military jargon and abbreviations that seem to be half of the words  that you use in the military is very prevalent.

Um, but I, I definitely think that that plays into it. And I also think that the fact that, you know, they're owned by the very companies that this show is waking people up to existing also has to do with it. But it has 95% by the audience, 95% score, which is, you know, again, obviously pretty damn close to the highest score you can get.

And then the critics give it a 30%. If you watch them, I've watched some shitty movies out there and, uh, they didn't get 30%. And the terminal list is not one of those shows. You cannot like. The content you can say that it's, uh, you know, um, revenge porn, which it's literally a show about somebody who gets his family murdered after being in the military and then goes after the people who murdered his family it's fiction.

It's not real, just in case you guys were curious about tomatoes. Um, but , I it's, it's interesting the fact that the critics gave us such a low score when the audience believes that the acting the, the show itself, you know, everything about it was, was really well done, which I agree with, including the fact that there was a ton of Navy seals who were on set with this.

Chris Pratt did a ton of training. I think he went to tart tactical in LA, um, and did their courses and learned how to clear rooms and learned how to act properly in these situations. And, you know, said that it was an opportunity for him to really step up, um, his acting. And I think that he really did accomplish that.

I think it's a great show. You should, you should, if you haven't started watching it yet, um, you should, I, I, I really think it's a good show. Um, you know, if you don't like violence, then maybe it's not the show for you, but you know, at the same time that these critics are praising shows that are out there, that, you know, are very, very gory.

um, you know, terminal list has a couple spots that are a little rough, but  overall, it's a very, very well done show. I, I don't see any reason that the critics should do that other than my theory, which is that, you know, George Soros did it.  not exactly, but kind of. Um, so the next thing is going to be, um, the fact that Ivana Trump died in an accident.

Um, according to this article by CNBC IANA, Trump died in a, seems to be a car accident from blunt impact injuries. Um, and that was said by a New York city medical examiner says Ivana Trump, the first wife of ex president Donald Trump died in an accident as a result of suffering blunt force impact injuries to her torso.

Um, and she was 73 years old, um, and was found dead in her Manhattan resident. So not a car accident died of blunt force trauma, not from a car accident. I thought it was a car accident. Um, The first wife died in an accident as a result, how do you die from blunt impact injuries to your torso in your own apartment?

The New York attorney General's office said that it had agreed at the request of lawyers for Donald Trump and two of his children to postpone depositions scheduled for next week in light of Ivan's death. Wow. So that took a turn. I wasn't expecting that. I literally thought this was from a car accident when I pulled up the article.

Um, and it seems to be that there's probably a little bit more to it than that. It says Yvon Trump, the first wife of former president Donald Trump died in an accident as a result of suffering blunt impact injuries to her torso, a senior New York city official with direct knowledge of the matter said the circumstances of her death are consistent with a fall on the stairs.

NBC news reported the official added the death is not suspicious, says the official. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. Okay, bud, you, you fell down the stairs and died from trauma to your stomach. The official added that the death is not suspicious. Yeah. Okay. The official ruling came a day after IANA was found dead in her Manhattan resident.

After the New York fire department responded to a call from there earlier Friday, the New York state attorney General's office said it had agreed to add the request of lawyers for Donald Trump and two of his children to postpone depositions. Geez, I would hope so. A spokesperson for the office of the medical chief examiner said that the cause of Ivanna's death was blunt impact trauma.

And the matter of her death was the manner of her death was accident. How do you know that? Unless that individual is literally sitting in the room with her, when she falls down the stairs onto her torso and then dies from it, what there's so many sketchy, like celebrity deaths and things like, I, I, I still feel like the Bo Biden situation is a little off, I guess he died of like brain cancer.

Um, but it still seems to me any high level official. Who has family or friends or they themselves die. It's always hyper hyper suspicious to me. And this one seems very suspicious. If you don't anything about the staircase documentary on Netflix,  this, this might have not been, you know, the accident that they're alluding to.

I would assume it's pretty difficult to fall downstairs and die from blunt trauma to your torso. Right? I can see that from your head, right? If you fall down some stairs and you bash your head on some concrete or something, that makes way more sense to me than blunt force trauma to your torso. It says that Trump's divorce in 1990 was acrimonious with both parties, waging their battle in the big apples tab newspaper, the New York post and the new, yeah.

Seems like not the time to be discussing their divorce. Um, Trump 76 married his third wife Melania in 2005, the elder Trump, Donald Jr. And Ivanca had been set to be deposed next week by investigators. So.  oh, Ivanca so the daughter. Okay, so not Ivan. Um, James is eyeing whether the company's illegally manipulated those valuations for financial benefits, such as reduced tax or favorable loan terms.

Eric Trump previously was deposed in the case, but involved or invoked his fifth amendment. Right? Um, more than 500 times. That's a lot of times Eric, um, James spokesperson on Friday said in light of the passing of Obama, Trump, we received a request for counsel for Donald Trump and his children to adjourn all three depositions.

Now, I don't know the reason why, or what is going on behind the scenes here, but the fact that Trump's being deposed currently for the January 6th deal, and then also happens to have his ex-wife, you know, just talking about the terminal list with large corporations who are killing people off so that they don't go to court and speak about something specific that would harm them, pro their profitability.

And then the ex-wife of the president at 73 seemingly healthy individual falls and dies from. Blunt trauma to her torso. Obviously this is horrible, regardless of where you're living politically, you should obviously have sympathy for the family. Um, that's terrible to happen to anybody, especially in that manner.

Right? How long was she laying there? If that was an accident? The fact that, you know, it probably wasn't an accident, in my opinion, based on the circumstances, the timing, the fact that the most contr controversial figure in the world's ex-wife dies under weird circumstances, falling down the stairs. Right.

Probably seems like the most OG way to assassinate somebody besides showing that they killed themselves, is them falling down the stairs? I don't. Just a guy who watched a lot of murder documentaries  um, but it seems suspect to me, um, again, terrible, horrible. If it's an accident, that's sad. It's terrible.

Um, if it's not an accident, one has to only imagine why, who did this? Why did they do it? Um, but it definitely seems a little, if not a lot, a bit fishy to me. Um, the fact that you, you generally don't just fall down the stairs, hurt your torso, your chest, your stomach. If you didn't know what a torso was,  and also die as a result of that trauma.

Um, what did you fall into that caused that trauma? You know, are you falling flat on the floor? Like, I just, it makes no sense to me. This is, this is super suspect. Um, and again, terrible for the family, terrible for the individuals involved. Um, but very, very sad and very, very suspect situation to have occurred here.

Um, but I don't know what to make of it yet. I guess time will tell. And maybe it won't as we saw with Epstein, cuz you know, the situations that happen here, the same individuals who would do something like this, if the terminal list is right,  have enough power have enough wielding in, in the legal system to where nobody would ever find this out, they would pay off the, you know, who did, who did they say?

The, the expert, um, added the death was not suspicious. Um, I don't know, seems super suspicious, but to be not suspicious, right? The fact that they just within a day, but before even any information comes out about how it happened, why it happened, you know, I'm sure if you're Yon Trump, you have dozens of cameras in your Manhattan loft mansion.

I don't know. I would assume. Right? I know everybody on the damn street here has a ring on their door. Right? You don't think that Ivana Trump, billions of dollars has a few cameras in her house.  and maybe if she does, they will release them, but I wouldn't hold your breath. Um, this goes on to say, this is a secondary article that I clicked on that said that they said that it was not suspicious.

Let's see if it has any more information surrounding the actual, uh, event. Um, it talks about IANA a little bit. It says Yana. Trump was a survivor. She fled from communism and embraced this country. She taught her children about grit, toughness, compassion, and determination. She will be dearly missed by her mother, her three children and 10 grandchildren.

Hmm. So, um, sad just in general, regardless of where you lean or who you believe in or what you think politically, uh, 73 year old falling down the stairs and dying from stomach trauma definitely comes with its own suspicions. All right. Now the next thing that we're gonna discuss here is going to be a Senate hearing where there was a line of questioning that I found to be interesting.

Um, we'll see if you have the same thoughts and here is the clip right now. Professor bridges. You said several times, you've used a phrase. I wanna make sure I understand what you mean by it. You've referred to people with a capacity for pregnancy. Would that be women, many women, CIS women have the capacity for pregnancy.

Many CIS women do not have the capacity for pregnancy. Um, there are also trans men who are capable of pregnancy, as well as non-binary people who are capable of pregnancy. So this isn't really a women's rights issue. It's a it's. We can recognize that this impacts women while also recognizing that it impacts other groups.

Those things are not mutually exclusive. Senator Holly. Oh, so your view is, is that the core of this, this right then is about what.  so, um, I wanna recognize that your line of questioning, um, is transphobic , um, and it opens up trans people to violence by not recognizing them. Wow. You're saying that I'm opening up people to violence by asking whether or not women or the folks who can have pregnancies.

So I'm one. I wanna note that one out of five transgender, uh, persons have attempted suicide. So I think it's important because of my line of questioning, because, so we can't talk about it because denying that trans people exist and pretending not to know that they exist, I'm denying that trans people exist by asking you, if you're talking about women, you having pregnancies, do you believe that, uh, men can get pregnant?

No, I don't think men can get pregnant.

So you are not gonna trans people like this thing. And that leads to violence. Is this how you run your classroom? Are students allowed to question you? Absolutely. Or they also treated like this or? No? They're allowed to question. They're opening up people to violence. We have a good time in my class. You should join.

I bet you might learn a lot. Wow. I would learn a lot. I've learned a lot since in this exchange. Absolutely extraordinary. Yep. I believe she's a Yale law professor or from some sort of prestigious university. This woman gets up there and says, basically that, um, talking about trans individuals and the fact that he, he asked her, you know, what are they?

And I guess that's the conversation that I think is interesting to bring up with these people is like, you know, again, I think you should be able to do whatever you want. I don't think the government should infringe upon your right to do anything, but for you to try to force other people to abide by your reality and not their own is not your place to do so.

And it's definitely not the government's place to enforce it or social media companies. Um, but in this case scenario, she asked him, do you think a man can get pregnant? And this guy says, no, I don't think that a man can get pregnant. And she says that he's opening up trans people to violence for saying that men don't get pregnant.

It's so bizarre to me. And I maybe touched on this a little bit too much over the last few episodes, but it's just, we're in a crazy little clown world right now where, you know, people's reality of the LA like this has literally only been a conversation for the last two years and to treat somebody that way over a difference in perspective on what you deem to believe your reality is, which is that men can be women and women can be men.

And the word is so convoluted of being a man or a woman now that none of it matters, but also it does matter because you have to call them by what they believe themselves to be or else you're, uh, opening them to violence. I think that's a silly argument in a silly conversation. Somebody you can, you can play all the mental gymnastics that you want.

You can say that, you know, trans people can't have, or can have babies. A, a trans man can have a baby because they're actually a woman and they have biological uterus and can have children through the uterus, but they believe themselves to be a man.  but their body allows them to be a woman physically.

And so that changes the reality of whether or not they can have children. I guess that's the argument, right? Um, let me try that better.  the argument is that a woman who is a woman, but believes herself to be a man can have a baby as a man, because she's no longer a woman because she decides that she's a man.

But when, but is now identifying as a man and a man can identify as a woman, but the man who identifies as a woman, can't have a baby because they're actually a man. I just confused myself. So I don't know. Maybe, I don't know. It seems like a, you can say whatever you want. If you wanna say that men can have women, men can have babies, not women.

men can have babies because before they were women and now they also were a man that has a uterus, and that allows them to have a baby, but they're actually a man. It's it's a very, you just have to understand that that's mental gymnastics, you're playing of a word game, right? The, the, I said this before gender and gen tolls have the same root word, which is if we look it up, I don't think I ever discussed this last time.

If you look at the actual root word, like the, um, what is it? The, uh, Latin of Jen, which is where that word derives. That's the derivative of the word? Um, that's the, where it comes from. It means something produced, but mainly in modern use, um, things are causes or born of born of gender genitals, gen Latin, born of, okay.

That's the words. Okay. You know, a lot of people think that words are useless and don't mean anything. And there just sounds, and it's a construct, which in some cases you are correct, but there's a derivative of the word gen, the gen and gender, and the gen and genitals have the same derivative Latin meaning, which is born.

You were born of being a man. You were born of being a woman, whether you would want somebody to call you a man or want somebody to call you a woman and you wanna wear certain types of clothing and, you know, participate in, I don't know, maybe not sports, but other things I don't care do what you wanna do.

I, you know, I think everybody should be able to do whatever they wanna do when they wanna do it. But the fact that you're gonna sit here and tell this man that he's opening people up to violence for questioning your line of thinking, which was only developed in the last two years as a mainstream ideological perspective.

But you want tell him that he is opening up people to violence because he doesn't agree with you that a man who I, or a woman who identifies as a man is actually a man who can actually have a baby. No, it, they have a uterus. It's a woman. And that's the reason they can have a baby is because they were born of gen Latin derivatives, born of the genitals, the gender of being a woman.

Now again, do whatever you wanna do. You know, you're a woman, who's a man now and a man who's wants to be a woman now, you know, great do you. That's awesome. You know, the, the government shouldn't infringe on that. Nobody should be violent towards you for having that perspective or wanting to pursue your truth or whatever you want to call it.

Um, but you can't tell this man that he's inciting violence and causing people to kill themselves because he doesn't believe that a man can have a baby because biologically they cannot biologically, they cannot biologically a man with a uterus is actually a woman and a woman who has a penis is actually a man.

That's the way the gender works. That's the way that biology works. And the way that biology works is somebody with a uterus can have a baby. And that uterus means that they're born of being a. So that line of questioning, and then she gets super snippy with him. Like the fact that you wanna be so kind like if you want, and this is the problem with a lot of the mainstream arguments that people are having, that is such mental gymnastics, cuz again, I'm of the framework and of the mindset that like, I'm not gonna infringe on you being you do you, I don't care.

Be a fucking cat if you want to be, but don't get pissed off at me. If I call you, ma'am when we're in a store and I'm being polite by opening the door for you, whatever, right? Like don't be fucking offended when the world, the, the normal construct, the binary, right? Cuz gender is actually binary. Your a or your B a means you have a penis.

B means you have a vagina and you can't intermingle. Right? You can't eventually you can flip your, you can have as many surgeries as you want. You still can't have a baby if you're a man. Okay. And you can play as many gymnastics as you want mentally. But it doesn't mean that you get to push your ideological perspectives on other people and tell them they're causing violence and making people commit suicide.

Right. And, and the actual framework of that argument is so flawed because the amount of people who commit suicide as a result of being trans is not due to somebody telling you they can't have a baby. It's generally due to the fact that the DSM five identified gender dysphoria as a mental issue up until I don't know, they probably changed it in like the last 48 hours.

Um, but it was a gender dysphoria. It was literally taught to me in psychology the same way. Now, again, we you'll find this being actually pushed ideologically and, and censorship now because Reddit. This week just passed new rules and regulations or whatever, saying that. If you say that somebody who is a, I think, what was it?

They, they used the word groomer or pedophile. If you use the word groomer or pedophile on Reddit today, you can be flagged for hate speech that is in the new rules and regulations of Reddit that was just passed this week. Right now they're saying specifically, I think in the, what, the article that I was reading, that it could be used for people who are calling people who are trans or, uh, uh, gay or whatever as being groomers.

But that's not what people are doing when they're assimilating it. They're assimilating it to that because when you go online and you see all of these atrocious videos of these, uh, you know, um, what are they called? What are they? They're not trans they're, uh, what's the word where they go, um, damn, what's it called?

They go get dressed up and they dance all crazy and they put on all makeup, but they're not a woman. They don't identify as woman. Uh, well, it's the word? What's the. Hmm, guess we can't find it. You know what I'm talking about?  I can't believe, I can't think of it. Um, but whatever, right. The people who dance.

Right. Let's see. Maybe one more, one more try. One more try drag Queens. Thank you. All right. We got somebody  drag Queens. All right. So drag Queens is where they go dress up and they do a whole show and they have fun and they dance and it's this like sexual experience. And they're like to freely express themselves and address when actually they, you know, are a man or whatever.

Um, but what we've found in the last, I don't know, few months is in these pride parades and things. You're seeing like people topless, dancing and shaking their boobs in front of like young children. You're seeing like, uh, these drag Queens twerking in front of children at a table for like a, a pride awareness party at a strip club.

Like it's all of this weird little. And there was a video that I saw that I respect highly this drag queen who came out and said that, you know, drag is a highly sexualized high, high intensity, like drug culture. That's what it is. He said, he said, because it's drag, not a trans. He said that he believes that there's no reason that they should be doing this.

There's no reason children should be around. Drag is not intended for children. It's a hypersexualized culture. That's based on sexuality in some way, shape or form. And that there's no anybody who wants children at these types of events are groomers in our pedophiles. Cuz that's fucking creepy. Why do you wanna shake your ass or your boobs in front of a six year old?

And if somebody did that to my child on the side of the street, I'm sorry, I'm hitting you for sexually assaulting my child very hard.  because that's sexual assault. You don't get to put your boobs in front of a child regardless of what parade you're at. And, and then ex and then censor people for calling you a groomer, like in the same way that we talked about Disney, right?

The Baymax series that just came out, um, like two weeks ago. And you have the, the, the trans man or trans man, trans man, who's actually a woman giving input on tampons, but there was no context around it. They didn't tell you it was a trans person. They didn't tell you, they used to be a woman, another man.

They just had the trans flag on their shirt and said, what type of tampons they use and then pushed those episodes to five, six and seven year olds. Because that's what the child's side of Disney is about. It's about people who are under the age of seven, because over seven, you get access to all the shows or something like that.

So that's what that is. It's grooming. It's the same thing of Disney putting sex in the stars in the lion king. It's the same thing of the guy having the erection in, in the little mermaid. It's the same thing. As it's all grooming, it's all them hyper sexualizing our culture from a very young age. And why else would you wanna push these things in, in before sex education?

Right. I think this is the biggest point that you can make about this. If you want to have a conversation about a trans gay, lesbian, straight sex, uh, literally whatever you want to have. That's a conversation around sexuality, which has again, root words, sex in it. It should be done at the age of sex ed or above.

You shouldn't have to pass a bill in Florida that gets ridiculed for being the don't say gay bill. When actually in reality, what we were saying is don't push your sexual ideology onto our children under the age of seven. Or eight or whatever it was. Yeah, because you don't have sex education until you are in sixth grade.

And even when you're in sixth grade and you have that sex education, you have to get a parent consent form in order to be educated by the state and have your child be told about sex by the state. There's a reason, there's a reason that you have to have a parent consent form at sixth grade to learn the biological aspects of sexuality and sex and how your body works.

Because some parents don't want that ideology being pushed by the state. They don't want the mainstream narratives around sexuality or whatever this is to be given to them by a teacher who they don't know personally, who may be a fucking creep on their own. They don't want that. And it's completely expected.

I don't know who my children's teachers are. It's maybe I don't want my sixth, sixth, or what is it? Sixth grade would be like, what 12.  maybe I don't want my 12 year old being educated about sex in the different types of sex by a middle-aged creeper ass man. Who's usually the gym teacher looking at girls in short shorts all day.

And that's the only reason they got the job. Cause he is a creep. You should be able to use the word groomer or pedophile when they're doing something that El alludes to them being a groomer or a pedophile seems like a pretty straightforward concept Reddit, but no, they don't want that because eventually the whole point of the little alphabet here, right?

What started rightfully as a movement for sexuality and people who are gay and lesbian and bisexual, to be able to sexually express themselves, however they want without the government intervening in their sex life, which they should absolutely be able to do get married, whatever a hundred percent should be able to do that.

But once you start throwing the Ts and the pluses. Eventually along comes the P and the P stands for pedophile. And that's the exact reason behind all of this to begin with with all of their little convoluted acronyms is eventually the damn list gets so long that if you question pedophilia, you are now questioning gay, lesbian, and bisexuals the same way that they've jumped on the boat with trans jumping onto the sexuality movement with gay and bisexuals, and it's trans is not a sexuality.

It is not a sexual preference. It has nothing to do with how you express yourself sexually. And I've seen all of these like, um, liberals of TikTok videos and, um, all of these conversations surrounding like these younger women and. Men or ZRS M Zs, uh don't know what Zeus, um, talking about, you know, I am, you know, trying to explain their pronouns and trying to explain their sexuality and they'll say something like, you know, everybody asks me what, how to they should address me because I am a gay, queer, bisexual, trans individual who also identifies as a cat.

Who's actually into lamps. It's like, what, what are you? Because that doesn't make any sense. Sexuality is about your sex life. It's not about how you identify your gender. And, and when you put in the acronyms, the L the, the GS and the bees makes perfect sense next to each other. And Q is just, I don't really get that one.

There's another way of reshaping the idea of the first three, but just in a convoluted way where you really don't know. And then the Ts have a completely separate category. And eventually, as I said, it's eventually the whole point is to lead to a P or what is it? What are they the map. Minor attracted individuals or a sick ass pedophile is what that is.

And that's what they wanna put at the end of it. So, excuse me, as a parent, when you're trying to teach my child sexuality on Disney, when you're trying to teach my at 5, 6, 7 years old on the child's side of Disney, excuse me. When you're trying to teach sexuality in my schools to my five year old, literally I drive down the road in my town and every single elementary school has like a trans flag on their little electronic thing.

Like who the hell, what percentage of elementary school kids have gender dysphoria or are trans or, you know, and, and, but what they're doing is they're planting seeds, right? They're planting seeds because eventually when you, you make that idea available, right? Because when you're a child, you have a bubble.

Right. You have this little bubble, that's the world, as your parents had made it for you. Right. And sometimes that's great and it's happy and you have a great life and, and it's love, and it's happiness and it's fun. And it's, you know, challenges and, and becoming a better person. And sometimes it's abuse and, and horrific things and, and, you know, abusive households and, and yelling and, and scared, and like all of these things.

So there's a bubble, right? For better, or for worse when you're a child between the ages of even like zero and probably, I don't know, probably like 14 you're in this bubble of like, really, you don't know how the world works. And the construct of the world has been made up for you by your parents. And to the extent that they want to shield you for better or, or worse from the world.

Right. That's because maybe there is something abusive going on or the world is abusive and they wanna shield you from that. There, there there's a bubble around that individual. There's a bubble around that child. And when you go in with a, a needle and pop that bubble, because you have a specific ideology that you want to push on children,  it's wrong.

Right? And again, if, if you're not teaching sex education until sixth grade, when they're 12, why should you be able to push a trans, uh, gender ideology onto my five year old in elementary school or preschool? And the only reason you would wanna do that is because you are grooming them. That is the whole point.

I, I don't know how other, what other way to look at it. So I would like, let's watch this clip one more time. We'll see what we all, we, we kind of picked from it, cause it was kind of a heated exchange. Um, but I would be interested in to see what, what I think there was a couple pieces there that I wanted to, to point out.

So this time I'll talk over it and we'll, uh, we'll discuss it while it's going on and I'll pause it. So here we go.

Now, professor bridges, you said several times, you've used a phrase. I wanna make sure I understand what you mean by it. You've referred to people with a capacity for pregnancy. Would that be women?

Many women, CIS women have the capacity for pregnancy. Many CIS women do not have the capacity for pregnancy. Um, there are also trans men who are capable of pregnancy, as well as non-binary people who are capable of pregnancy. So this isn't really a women's rights issue. It's a, we can recognize that this impacts women while also recognizing that it impacts other groups.

Those things are not mutually exclusive. Senator Holly. Oh, so your view is, is that the core of this, this right then is about what, and that's the other problem with the breakdown? It's like, if you say that you are a man who identifies as a woman, so now you're a woman. Cool. Do your thing. Um, but whether, if you're identifying as a woman, then what are you identifying as categorically?

Like, what are you saying that you. Right. Because if a man is a, a man who's identifies as a man, and just identifying as that in the beginning is the only thing that makes it what it is. What are you identifying as? What, what is this about, right? Is this a women's health issue is abortion. A women's health issue is not a birthing person's health issue.

There's a women's health issue. Right. And if it's a women's health issue, then it is the identification, or it is the, the biology of a woman that makes it so not the identification of being a woman, right. Because a man who says that he's a woman does not have the capability of having a baby, cuz he doesn't have the inner workings of doing so.

Um, and again, I've probably harp on this the last two months, it's just been in the news so much lately. It's just been such a constant, uh, conversation around these things. And it's in so many places between the Senate and Disney and everywhere, but you know, what, what are you identifying as? And, and you ask people that is like, okay, identify as a woman.

But I'm a, I was born a man. Okay. So in identifying as a woman, what is it? Cuz if I identify as Irish and I'm German or I'm whatever, south African and I identify as Irish, what am I identifying as well? I'm identifying as being from a certain country. That is the identification that has to do with where I am saying I am from, there's an identification.

Now, when you look at that and you say, okay, you're identifying as Irish, but you are German or you are south African. You are not Irish. You can't identify as that because it's not true in this reality. You cannot say that , it's not how that works. So when you identify as a woman, what are you saying that you are identifying as, is there anything else that you can say that as I identify as a, even if you say I identify as a liberal, okay.

You're identifying with a set of belief systems, you're identifying with a set of, of, uh, beliefs on certain topics, right? Like the fact that. Um, you know, you believe that abortion should be legal and it's not a baby until it's out in the world. And prior to that, you know, whatever happens happens. Um, you also believe that there should be very large social programs and, you know, whatever comes with being liberal, that is your identification.

It is a thing. It is a sub, there is substance to what that is. And if you're saying that gender, you know, is just a construct, it's just a belief system. Then what do you believe yourself to be? Because then are we going back to the fact that girls play with Barbies and boys play football? Like I thought that's exactly what we were trying to fight.

We were trying to fight gender roles, not gender identity. Right? So if you're identifying as a woman, but there's no actual classification of identification there, then you're nothing. It doesn't mean anything. You're not saying anything because you. I'm German. I'm not Irish. I'm not German. I might be a little German, but I'm not fully , but I'm not Irish.

So I can't say I'm Irish. Um, so it's like, what are you identifying as? And this is like where the conversation hits a halt and that's where you get all these emotional responses. Like we see here. And that's where she gets. She gets emotional immediately because when you try to play mental gymnastics in the world of reality, you know, it just doesn't work out well.

And again, do whatever you wanna do, call whoever what you wanna call them, but you can't force this in a Senate hearing. And, and you can't make somebody say that a man can have a baby. And that's what she tries to do here. So let's finish this out one last time. Um, I wanna recognize that your line of questioning, um, is transphobic , um, and it opens up trans people to violence by not recognizing them.

Wow. You're saying that I'm opening up people to violence by asking whether or not women are the folks who can have pregnancies. So I'm one. I wanna note that one out of five. You can hear her voice get all shaky. Like she gets so angry and upset in this emotional conversation. He's super, just chill. He's like, okay.

So you're saying that me questioning what it is that makes a woman is, is opening them to violence, me asking a biological scientific question regarding biology is now making people kill themselves, is that as a professor, your perspective, you know, and that's what he says is if I go into your classroom, right, is this how you're gonna treat people when they ask questions and it gets into this little pissy match between, you know, which is crazy to me because what usually like you certain.

Levels of political leadership are held to a certain regard. Right. And what we've seen is all these little, uh, spats between, you know, bureaucrats and, uh, law professors and senators, right? It's like show some respect. Let's have a conversation, let's have a debate. Let's let the debate be spirited and lively and you can even throw insults, but let's not say we're killing people with our words, cuz that's just not what's happening here.

Anyways, that's what I got for you guys this week. I hope you liked the rapid fire situation here today.  I think, uh, what we're gonna do on our next episode is gonna be a little bit of a long form, deep dive into the hunter Biden leak, which I find to be probably a, a very, very interesting topic after all of the research that I've done over the last few days of the actual, uh, emails, uh, off of the, um, there's lots and lots of stuff there.

So we're gonna dive deep into that. I found a great article that I can go, uh, piece by piece with for you guys. But again, thank you so much for joining me today. I appreciate it so much. Go ahead and hit that subscribe button, leave a five star review. If you're on the podcast here, if you're not listening on apple or apple podcast, Spotify, wherever you're at right now, head over there, um, and subscribe.

Okay. It takes two seconds of your time. It takes two seconds to leave a five star review on there for me, but it means the world, right? Type something up there for me. Um, you know, I, I had somebody go on to my. Reviews and say that I'm like transphobic and homophobic. And like I said, I don't care what you do.

I think you should absolutely have the right to marry whoever you want. I think you should be able to call yourself whatever you want. You can literally legally change your name and it doesn't matter. I think you should be able to say you are whatever you want to, but just don't expect other people to reciprocate that reality for you.

And definitely don't treat them bad over not wanting to accept your reality and your construct that you've created for yourself. Um, but again, I don't think that trans people should. Be open to violence. I don't think they should be threatened. I don't think they should be insulted. Um, same thing with people who are gay, lesbian, bisexual, I think you should be able to do whatever you want.

That's kind of a libertarian perspective. Just stay the hell out of everybody's lives. Right. Um, but what I need you to do is bury that comment for me, because there's no reason that I should be called a Transo for saying that a man with a penis can't have. Baby  so leave a five star review for me, write something nice.

I would appreciate it a lot. Um, but other than that, I hope you guys have a great day. Um, and I will see you next time, uh, which should be in just a couple days. I expect to do this deep dive on the Biden phone leak here, probably in the next day or two. Um, cuz I'm like just balls deep into the topic right now and uh, we'll have to discuss it.

So again, thank you guys so much. I appreciate it. From the bottom of my heart, head over to red pill, revolution.c.com is for losers and get yourself some life insurance. It would mean the world to me, it's the only way that I can continue doing what I do is by you guys signing up for life insurance. Um, you're not going through any third parties.

Nothing is directly under my license. There's eight states currently on there. Um, believe it's like Michigan, Virginia, Arizona. Uh, look it on there. Look it on the website. It has all the states that I can get. And if you need a state. Um, that I don't have just email me, Austin red pill, revolution.co, and I would love to buy the state to let you get some life insurance for you and your family.

Um, but again, I hope you have a great day. Welcome to the revolution.

In this week's episode, we discuss Elon Musk backing out of his deal to purchase Twitter, An Ohio bill that would make impregnating women consensually a crime that could be brought to civil court, medical malpractice, and the history of the medical-industrial complex and a skull found this week that some believe may have actually belonged to Bigfoot.

Subscribe and leave a 5-star review!

----more----

Full Transcription

Welcome to the revolution.

Hello and welcome to red. Pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams. Thank you so much for listening today. Very excited to jump into it. We have some pretty, pretty crazy stuff. We're gonna discuss everything from Elon Musk polling out of the Twitter deal. I believe that could have potentially been his plan the entire time.

So we'll discuss that. We will also discuss in Ohio bill, which would, uh, allow pregnant people to Sue over pregnant people, pregnant women, I guess it should say  it would allow pregnant women to Sue over unintended pregnancies. Um, we're also going to discuss some speaking of weird medical events and situations, um, a recent.

Article that came out, uh, from the Chicago Tribune discussing, um, basically medical malpractice and sexual assault on patients, which is horrifying reading through this. So we will discuss that. And then last but not least, we will discuss a recent, uh, uncovered skeleton, which somebody believes to have discovered a potential skeleton of what they believe to be Bigfoot.

You heard that, right?  so there's a video there's evidence. They have the skull, they claim to have, uh, smuggled it here over TSA and, uh, pretty, pretty wild stuff. So we are going to discuss all of that and more today, but first I need you to go ahead and hit that subscribe button real quick. Just tap. It feels good for.

It helps me puts us higher in the rankings, allows more people to see us and, and hear about the show. Um, so hit that five star review, go ahead and hit that subscribe button real quick. And it would mean the world to me, it takes two seconds of your day and it would mean the world, like I said, so without further ado, let's jump into it.

This is episode number 30, four of the red pill revolution podcast.

Welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams, red pill revolution started out with me realizing everything that I knew, everything that I believed, everything I interpreted about my life is through the lens of the information I was spoon fed as a. Religion politics, history, conspiracies, Hollywood, medicine, money, food, all of it, everything we know was tactfully written to influence your decisions and your view on reality by those in power now.

I'm on a mission, a mission to retrain and reeducate myself to find the true reality of what is behind that curtain. And I'm taking your ass with me. Welcome to the revolution.

All right. So episode number 34 of the red pill revolution podcast. And we're gonna jump right into our first topic today, which is Elon Musk files to back out of the Twitter deal. Crazy. I, I, I did not see this coming honest. I thought it was gonna go through. We saw all of the things that were going wild and crazy at Twitter, all of their, all hands on deck meetings.

Um, all of the footage that was leaked from project Veritas, discussing all of the, you know, people jumping the metaphorical, uh, ship with Twitter, um, talking about, you know, layoffs and stuff. And now Twitter stock has Essent. Plummeted. I mean, they lost like four, uh, $4 worth of their stock, which is like billions and billions of dollars of evaluation for their company.

Um, so wild. Now I have a theory about this. I mean, I think Elon Musk is smart enough to have potentially pulled this off and, uh, maybe did this entire thing on purpose to basically show the public how many bots are actually on, uh, your social media handles or on your social media networks that you're on.

And I think it could have all. A a big brain plan that he had put together, but let's read this article real quick and then we will discuss it. All right. It goes on to say that Elon Musk is terminating his 44 billion deal to buy Twitter, but the company vowed Friday to still complete the deal, setting the stage for a legal battle that could lead to more turmoil and uncertainty for the social media network.

This is coming off of the Chicago post. And this says after growing months of grow or after months of growing doubt that he intended to close the deal. Musk lawyer sent a letter to Twitter, arguing that he has a right to drop out of the agreement because Twitter hasn't given him enough information about the company's business.

Musk file. Musk's filing was blunt about his intentions. He is terminating their merger agreement, the letter attached in the securities and exchange commissions filing Friday said, now it goes on to say that, but Twitter's board hit back at the billionaire saying that it would pursue legal action to enforce the deal.

Legal experts have said it would be difficult for Musk to just walk away from the agreement. The agreement also has a $1 billion breakup. I like how they say that legal experts, like who's legal experts, who are these people? Like, yeah. They passed the bar once seven years ago, and now you paid them 500 hours to say something that aligned with your article.

like legal experts. Like please define that. And maybe even tell us who they are. You know, that seems to be important. Like who are these legal experts that you, uh, are, are using to describe how, what, what could actually go down here. But it is interesting to note that there is a $1 billion breakup. Hmm.

Haven't really seen that in contracts before, but I, I would ventured a bet that it, it will be pretty detrimental to Twitter's stock. I mean, it already has been immediately, immediately. It was detrimental to Twitter's stock, but it goes honestly, that Twitter has plunged into chaos since Musk announced his intentions to take over the firm in April employees, fearing layoffs in a significant change of operat.

Under, uh, and under the billionaire have been looking for new jobs. As Musk has regularly aired his criticisms of the business in tweets of his own, and the billionaires moved to exit the deal leaves, Twitter's reputation and jeopardy with its future ownership in flux. And again, this is coming right after they had a basically as.

CEO change, um, that P P golly, I don't know whatever the guy's name is. Um, but the, the, basically the guy who said that he vowed to have more censorship, you know, um, coming off of you going on to the platform, which was obviously a very concerning thing for a large portion of the country. Uh, and then immediately, immediately almost after that CEO change, um, which makes you think even more, maybe they had a little bit more information about it than, than we thought.

Uh, but. Um, it goes on to say that it's discombobulated their whole operation, um, said Carl Tobias law professor at the university of Richmond, it's going to be tough for Twitter to weather this now. I think it's interesting. I think it's a really interesting, uh, uh, uh, thought experiment here to assume that Elon Musk could potentially be the smartest man in the world alive.

I think it's pretty safe to, uh, to say that he's at least in the top 10 of intellect in the world. Now he's also potentially in the top 10 in the world for trolling , he's, he's probably on a lot of lists here. Um, but he's, you know, trolling and intellect are definitely the top tens that you can say that Elon is a part of.

So. Here's my theory. I think that Elon Musk could have done this all intentionally. I think Elon Musk would have been willing to take a billion dollar hit to basically expose the entire social media world and show that it's basically at least 50% of the people that you're interacting with, or you think you're interacting with could potentially be bot.

And now bots don't just mean like AI algorithms bots mean huge swarms, like big picture, big, huge call centers from like the nineties of like a bunch of people picking up the phone and dialing, you know, 500 times every two minutes. Now, picture them on social media networks with 30 phones in front of them, all running different accounts, all liking, following tweeting, the same things, all, you know, going after a single individual, all of these same people.

Reporting the same account at the same time on the same tweet for the same reason. That's what the bot farming deal is. It's not, you know, computer AI algorithms all of the time. Now there is definitely a differentiation there between the bots that are out there that like you can pay for certain companies that will like follow and unfollow different accounts and, you know, send out messages on your behalf and you can do that.

BS. But I, I believe the things that he's talking about specifically, the, the concern with the bots is that they're fake accounts. They're not real people, but they're also not the robots sitting on, in, on Twitter. , they're real people sitting there with 30 phones in front of them with specific political and, and, uh, financial intentions.

Right. Because if you know how to, you know, if, if, if you think of it this way, and I think I've talked about this before that, you know, the, um, Youngy in theory of the collective unconscious, right? The collective unconscious is the internet. And if it's nothing else, it is social media. Right. And, and, and you can see the, where the collective swarm of consciousness goes on any given day.

If you go to the trending page on Twitter, What, what is the, what is the major, you know, the humanities brain thinking of and discussing at the same exact time, right? What is everybody's mind on at each individual moment? Right. And you can see that swarm go from one topic to another day by day from, you know, the Johnny Depp trial to, you know, the shootings, to the political scandals, to this, to that, to hearings, to, you know, you can see the swarm and where it goes and where consciousness as humanity goes to specifically based on social.

Right. You can go to the training page. You can see exactly what is on the collective unconscious at any given.  all right. So now there's one theory that he was basically buying Twitter so that he could eventually use the data of human consciousness and that collective unconscious to eventually integrate it with his, uh, Neurolink technology.

Um, Or his AI technology. That's one theory. And that's definitely a real theory, right? I, I, I think if you're going to purchase, you know, the, the, the largest amount of human thoughts ever, and be able to utilize that data, however you want.  there's definitely, you know, probably a, a conflict of interest if somebody owns an AI company.

I think that's fair to say. Now a different theory is that he did all of this specifically just to expose the social media companies for what they were. And to show that to, to be able to extract out. Social media companies from having to show the numbers, right? He says, how many bots do you have? It was like maybe a week after he asked for this report on how many bots they had.

And now he's all of a sudden he's pulling out. Now. He says, it's because you guys didn't gimme enough data. Right. And that's fair. But what data is he talking about? He's talking about the data of the bots. He's wanting to know what, what, what percentage of your actual numbers are physical people and what are political, uh, calls, you know, um, bot farms in Russia in China, in Delaware.

Um, I, I think that's a fair thing for him to want to know. So he extracted that information from them in a way that no other person on this world or planet could have done, right. He put them into a position. He backed them into a corner where he said, I'm going to buy your company. They said, no, you're not.

He said, oh yes, I am. Because if you don't let me do this, it's against the best interest of your shareholders. And legally you have to do what's in the best interest of your shareholders. And prior to him knowing he was gonna close this deal, he knew the steps that he had to take. And one of those steps was figuring out the actual physical numbers of the amount of, of, uh, traffic.

Through his social media network that he was looking to purchase that were real people and what was fake. And that's where it got interesting. And within a week of him receiving that report, that's when he pulled out. Okay. Now, if he did this all in a collective, uh, you know, a, a purposeful idea to go after these social media companies and to, uh, basically expose them for what they are 50% potentially of the people that you interact with on social media could not be.

Real people, their intentions could be fake. Their political leadings could be fake. Their extremist violent, uh, speech could be fake, their incitement of political, uh, um, you know, uh, protests could be fake. Uh, you know, basically half the internet could be Ray apps sitting there telling people they're going into the capital  on January 6th.

Um, so. I don't know. I guess time will tell, we'll see if this actually goes through, you know, you, it's funny right now, if you look up Elon Musk, Twitter backs out, look it up anywhere. Google news, wherever the hell you get, what you look at, go look it up. Find some articles through a search engine. And the only thing you're gonna see on articles is not about him pulling out and why.

It's just about the fact that there's legal ramifications to him doing. Which is interesting too, because Google doesn't want you to know the reason, right? The, the, the, the curated search engines don't want you to know why he actually could be potentially pulling out of this deal. They want you to know that there is legal and financial ramifications for him doing so, which is interesting.

Right. So I just, I thought that was, you know, I, I tried to find the easy article initially, right? When this happened about, you know, why he was pulling out what the deal was with it, you know, just read something about it. And the only articles that I could find, at least in the first few pages all had to do with the fact that there was a potential buyout cost, um, that, you know, they were gonna Sue him that, you know, all of this craziness, but you don't actually get down to the bottom of the article where it actually, you know, eventually I found one like this one here, where it talks about why.

But even this one goes on to talk about, you know, legal experts.  some guy who passed the bar when he was 23 and is now 55 and works for our news company, says  that he's agrees with our statement. Oh, surprise. Surprise. All right. So I guess we'll see what happens. I am hopeful that this was all intentional  because the, the, the, the unbelievable amount of billionaire trolling that, that could be done that has not been done, uh, you know, this would live up to my expectations, you know, and that's an interesting thing.

I, I think I heard, um, I heard it recently on a, uh, the different podcast where they were saying, uh, it, it's quite interesting to me that all of these billionaires actually play by the rules that they actually play the game. Right. Why, why isn't there more Elon Musks out there smoking weed on podcasts and, you know, given the middle finger to all the major corporations that are out there and, and building flame throwers, cuz it's cool.

Like , you know, being the, um, the billionaire, the 13 year old, you. Fired to be a billionaire, wanted you to be not some, you know, uh, lame ass old dude who just does exactly what you know, his political alignments want him to do. I dunno. But anyways, I hope this was all intentional. I hope it was a long term troll by Elon Musk, cuz that would literally be the greatest thing ever.

And, and I wonder what the legal, if any ramifications would be, if he said this to begin with, I was gonna buy you if you had legitimate numbers, but I knew you wouldn't  so. Anyways, let's move on the next portion. Uh, the next topic that we're gonna discuss is a Ohio bill that would allow pregnant women to Sue men over unintended pregnancies.

So what this is saying is that if you have a one night stand and you get the woman pregnant, she can Sue you for the baby. Now I would like to note that this is a frivolous bill that will never pass. And it's one of those that basically some random lawmaker you've never heard of this one comes from, uh, testifies, Senator Tina Mahar.

Who's a Democrat, uh, testifies in a Senate committee in October 20, 21st. Um, at least that's. Yeah. So I'll read this article to you and then we'll discuss it, cuz this is crazy. It says with Ohio's new six week abortion ban in place, a democratic state lawmaker says it's time for the Ohio legislator to give consideration to her bill that holds men who cause an unintended pregnancy responsible, whether the sex that led to the pregnancy was consensual or not.

Hmm. Okay. Tina Maher. Sad. Her bill would allow anyone who becomes pregnant to file a civil lawsuit against the person who impregnated to them. Even if it happened as a result of consensual sex. Excuse me. Ma'am have you ever heard of child support?  it's literally what the, the whole point of that is. Yes.

If you impregnate somebody, they literally have to pay you, right. Or if you get impregnated by. Most likely a man, cuz that's who impregnates people. Maybe not according to this article with pregnant people in the, the title, but you gotta pay money for the rest of the li the last 18 years. You have to pay child support for that baby.

All right now, What we're finding as a theme with a lot of these democratic senators and, and, and even, you know, conservative, uh, Republican senators and things is, is they're doing these like click baby bills bills in, in laws that they're trying to pass, that they know will never have a chance ever. Of getting past there's sensational bills that have no merit to them.

They're ridiculous. But they're statement bills. They're trying to get famous on social media over saying, they're gonna allow you to go to civil court over somebody impregnating you like there. I wonder I, I should be finding a list of these because there's been a lot of these bills lately in the last two to three years that normally would have, you know, taken away the legitimacy of this lawmaker.

And now they're like, yeah. You know, go after the man who you consensually had sex with because the outcome of which was exactly what sex is intended for, which is reproduction.  I, I think maybe if you were, if you missed sex ed class in sixth grade, you could have an argument here, but unless you have no idea how you actually wound up pregnant,  like, if you were in, in a, you know, um, What's that show?

Uh, I forget it it's like where she comes out of a, a, um, from a cult and she was in a host and she was like five years old. It's a comedy. There might be new girls, a new. Might be a new girl. I don't know. Um, but anyways, she, uh, you know, it's like somebody came out from a cult from underneath the earth for 35 years and all of a sudden they're just baffled by the way that recreation happens.

Uh, because they thought a, a, a golden Swan dropped an egg and on your porch, uh, because they're cult leader told them. So, and now they're pregnant and they're mad about it cuz they had no idea. This is actually how you got pregnant. . And now they go to court to Sue them. Like that's the only, it it's crazy.

Anyways, let's read this article a little bit longer. It says, regardless of the circumstance, I felt it was important to have that vague language, uh, due to the fact that abortion is now banned here in the state of Ohio, the vague lay language being, it would allow anyone who becomes pregnant to file a civil lawsuit against the person who impregnated them.

Even if it happened as a result of consensual sex, the bill has little to no chance of receiving a committee hearing or passing the Republican held Ohio Senate. Matt Harrah's bill would allow the court, um, would allow the court. Well, they wrote this terribly. Would allow the court could order a person who it determines, causes a pregnancy.

I like how they don't say man, , it's a man. If they can impregnate somebody, uh, at the point of fetal activity can be detected. Maha said that the existence of the new law makes it more important that people who become pregnant. Women have the option to file a civil lawsuit against the person who impregnated them, the man who impregnated them, regardless of how it happened.

How do you think it happened?  um, she said that she was disturbed by a recent news story in which a 10 year old pregnant girl was denied an abortion in Ohio and was forced to drive to Indianapolis to get one. She said many women don't even know they are pregnant at that. The urgency comes because at six weeks, not everyone knows that.

Especially if you are 10 years old and pregnant at 10 years old, you don't know too much about your reproductive rights. Fair. Maybe that's a situation where, you know, maybe they wouldn't know how sex occurred.  and maybe they should be able, but still child support. What are you gonna do in a civil lawsuit besides, you know, I just doesn't make any sense.

A group of democratic lawmakers have introduced a package of legislation that they say, well, help parents afford the cost of raising infants and children in the state. Oh, well that seems like a better idea. Why don't we help people raise children instead of funding them to not have. The bill addresses several issues such as eliminating the sales tax families pay for diapers and creating a one time $600 infant formula tax credit to help families afford these.

The bill has yet to have a hearing in a Senate committee, but Republican lawmakers have said they intend to pass a complete ban on abortion when they come back into session in November. So the likelihood of this passing is very, very slim. It's another one of those sensationalized bills that are only there for click bait.

Literally we have click bait politics. Now we're moving from the fact that we have, you know, actual news articles to clickbait articles. We going now from where we have legit. Politics and policies being passed to click bait policies, trying to be passed just for cloud. This is getting ridiculous. All right.

But that does lead us to our next article here, here, and this article has a little bit of a relation to the ridiculousness of this article. Um, but in a very. Sick and twisted way. So, um, the medical industrial complex. Now this is from, uh, Chicago Tribune that says she didn't want a pelvic exam, but got one anyways, while under anesthesia in many states, consent is not required.

Now my wife brought this up to me. She said, this is disgusting. This is ridiculous. It, it, it basically is a, a legal option of medical rape like that doctors apparently do all the time. Like it's, it's sickening. It's, it's disgusting. It's sickening. And it's no surprise to me with the way that, you know, we see, uh, birth.

In hospitals being done and things being forced on women and, um, that, that they didn't consent to just because it's, it's they're in that situation. So it says that Janine, a nurse in Arizona checked into the hospital for stomach surgery in 2017, before the procedure, she told her physician that she did not want many, many medical students to be directly involved after the operation.

Janine said, as the anesthesia wore off, a resident came by to inform. That she had gotten her period. The resident had noticed while conducting a pelvic exam, she then responded by saying, what pelvic exam distress. She tried to piece together what had happened while she was unconscious. Why had her sexual organs been in inspected during an abdominal operation by a medical student later?

She said her physician explained that the operating team had seen. That that the operating team had seen. She was due for a pap smear, Janine burst into tears and said, I started having panic attacks, trying to figure out what had happened. She recalled an interview. I have a history of sexual abuse and it brought up bad memories.

She felt especially unnerved as a medical professional patients put such trust in the medical profession, especially on sensitive topics, such as going under anesthesia. So basically what happened is this lady went in for a surgery, a random abdominal surgery. She specifically said she didn't want any medical students, a part of this surgery and the surgery had specifically nothing to do with her reproductive system.

And they brought these students in to do perform a pelvic exam for experience, not for any medical necessity for experience without the patient's consent. It says that pelvic exams, nece necessitate physical inspection of the most sense of the areas of a woman's body, the exams are typically conducted while the patient is awake and consenting at a gynecologist visit to screen for certain cancers, infections, and other reproductive health issues.

But across many states and many medical institutions, physicians are not required to obtain explicit consent for the procedure. Sometimes the exams are conducted by doctors or doctors in training while women are under anesthesia for gynecology or gynecological in other operations, often the exams are deemed medically necessary, but in some cases they're done solely for the educational benefit of medical trainees.

At some hospitals, physicians discuss the procedure with patients beforehand or detail at specifics, but at others, the women are left completely unaware that their bodies were going to be violated by a medical doctor. For educational purposes without consent. That's horrifying. That's literally rape that's.

That's what that is. There's no other way to describe that. That is what these doctors are doing to these, to these women. It's it's horrifying. So it says there's no numbers to indicate how many pelvic exams have been performed nationwide without consent. But regional surveys suggests that the practice is not uncommon.

A 2005 survey at the university of Oklahoma found that a majority of medical students had performed pelvic exams on unconscious patients. And in nearly three out of four instances, they thought informed consent had not been obtained

majority. So more than 50% of medical student. Had performed these type of pelvic exams, three fourths of them. They believed there was no consent done. So more than 50% of doctors have been bummed involved. And 75% of those that were involved in these at least at least 50%, um, 75% were done without consent.

The doctor believed

that's horrifying. That's terrible. And that should be, and is illegal. Without the white coat syndrome that they get to wear around as if they get to touch people's body without their consent horrifying. It, it, it speaks to me like it speaks to the, to the actual medical, industrial complex, the, the way that doctors view you, if you go into a doctor and I've experienced this several times with my wife, with our pregnancies and, and having our children and, and, you know, we had two of our children at home as home birth.

My wife did, and she's a boss. Um, she had two of our children at home.  and, but we went in a couple times just to make sure that things were okay. We had some concerns, there were some things going on. We went into the hospital to get some type of work done. There was like terrible migraines. And when we went in, we had, it was like days and days and days that she had been experiencing this.

We had given her tons of water. She had taken a bunch of Tylenol. We went in there and basically just told him, you know, we want to get an MRI. We wanna make sure that there's no real serious issues. And, um, they offered us an IV of fluids and Tylenol. You know, we said, she's very hydrated. We made sure that she drank water the entire time.

She drank a ton of water and she's been taking Tylenol. So we said we don't, you know, we're really not interested in that because we know they're gonna bill us, you know, $850 for water in Tylenol. And we had already taken care of those things. We knew that wasn't the issue. But the second that we said no to those, the second that we showed that, you know, she voiced her opinion and you know, my, when they came in and said, we're gonna be doing IVs in Tylenol, IVs for fluids in Tylenol, through the IV.

And I said, I looked to my wife and I said, is that what you want? They didn't ask her her opinion on it. They didn't ask her if that was okay. They didn't ask her if she wanted to pay that money for the cost of water and Tylenol. They were just gonna do it. They assumed the sale, right? When you learn sales, the big part of learning sales is, is, is learning how to speak to people in a way that they go along with what you say.

And one way of doing that is assuming that they will go along with what you say. What I'm gonna do now is just take your credit card information for this. Okay, great. You don't say, would you like me now to take your credit card information? No, we don't do that because that gives them the opportunity to leave the conversation or to say no.

So what doctors are literally trained to do is to come in and go, this is what we're going to do. Got it not, is this what you want me to. They just assume that you're an idiot. You have no experience that you're dumb. You have no awareness of your body or what your body might need, or what type of scans you might need.

They just assume that you're dumb and they do what they wanna do, regardless of your opinion. And if you say, no, you're automatically the enemy and that's what we're seeing this, you know, rear it's ugly head with here is they're assuming that body they're like cattle to, to them. You're like cattle to them.

And they assume that that body is theirs to use in whichever, which way that they want, including.  touching you in places that they shouldn't be while you're unconscious, without consent at all. And that's what they believe is their right. They think they have the right to do that. And they don't. Although according to this article, it's legal in several states for them to do so many states, obviously because more than half of doctors have said that they've done it.

And three fourths of the time that they've done it, they said they did not believe that there was consent. Which is just horrifying and terrifying all at the same time, because if you're a woman now and you go to get a surgery done, how are you gonna feel about that? How's that gonna make you feel to know that your doctor literally has unlimited rights to your body while you're sitting there unconscious?

Even if it has to do with your private area. Like just, it's so baffling to me that, that our medical industrial system believes that, you know, and I guess they have to look at you that way. There's so many patients maybe that definitely don't have to look at you in a way that your body and, you know, your vagina is their right to, to violate, but.

They look at you as if they're the expert, you're dumb, you're there because your cattle, they have to go buy a book that says, if there's this, then do this right. And they wanna check as many boxes as possible. Oh. And by the way, the medical system is designed to profit in the United States. It's the same reason that we're far, far, far down the list.

Tens of dozens of, if not hundreds of companies or countries down the list, when it comes to medical positive medical outcomes or mortality rates. Compared to profitability. We're like number 112 on the list for positive outcomes for medical procedures. And we're number one on the list for profitability.

And this goes back to the 1940s, right? You want to go back to the medical, industrial complex. And when this all happened was a shift after world war II. And what actually happened was they pushed out all, uh, osteo, um, yeah, osteopathic and homeopathic medicine for alopathic medicine. They basically shut down every school.

Right. Theys. It was like the, um, who was it? The, uh, it's like one of the major families, um, not the Rothchilds, but, um, Uh, who was it? One of the major, large, huge multi trillionaire families with ridiculous amounts of money basically started an organization that was meant to systematize the medical learning process, because a lot of it in, in, and to be fair, a lot of medical procedures and a lot of, you know, uh, medicine prior to the 1940s and thirties was like snake oil salesman, selling, telling you that they could cure your, uh, blindness with, uh, A certain herb from their garden and they mashed it up and put it into an oil.

Right. And so they could do that. There was no federal regulations for how they actually had to, um, you know, uh, there was no certifications. There was no testings. It was, there was like the wild, wild west.  so what, you know, rightfully they came in and did is kind of systematized it and said there, okay, there should be some, you know, gate keeping to this.

Not everybody should be able to be a doctor. You should have to go through some type of schooling to do so, but what ended up happening is they basically lobbied enough to push out all osteopathic and homeopathic medicine for alopathic medicine. And if you understand the difference between osteopathic homeopathic and alopathic medicine is alopathic medicine treats.

Disease like a war that they have to win outside sources to do. So, right. There has to be some type of pharmaceutical medication that intervenes in your body because your body is not able to do these things on its own. So they have to put something into your body that will then assist because without it, a lot of things will go.

And what homeopathic and osteo or homeopathic and osteopathic medicine tends to believe like a do as opposed to an MD, which is a doctor of osteopathic medicine tends to believe is that your body can do a lot of things on its own. Your body has a lot of ways to fight illnesses, um, without the need for tons of medical, inter.

Right. It doesn't treat it like a war that they have to win as the doctor, they treat it as, you know, uh, um, a, some type of way that they can support your body in fighting it through natural means as much as possible. And if you need to do so, then you go address these things with a surgery or something, but you definitely try some other things first.

Right. So very fair. Uh, you know, osteopathic medicine is, is the most common type of medicine when you go over to the UK. Um, and in many parts of the country and many parts of the world, osteopathic medicine is the standard same thing with homeopathic medicine. And it was the standard way prior to allopathic medicine coming in and implementing these things through lobbying.

So. They came in, they implemented these things. They lobbied enough. They basically shut down all osteopathic and homeopathic schools of medicine, and basically eliminated doctors from this certain, uh, association of doctors that meant that you had merit in the medical world and they did it through this association of, of physicians.

And it allowed them to basically push out everything else, but alopathic medicine. Then they started to come out with these pharmaceutical companies, you know, and then that eventually led to, you know, uh, Pfizer getting the major contract for penicillin shots through world war II, because there was a ton of soldiers who were dying from things like gang green and random shit, cuz they were shoving dozens and dozens of.

Of men into a boat together that the, they didn't have the proper shoes to be on even, or any type of medical care there with them. So they were basically just shoving, uh, penicillin shots into them. And so Pfizer got the number one contract with that, you know, and this is kind of a, a side tangent on what we just talked about, but it eventually led to Pfizer becoming what it is today and vaccine schedules becoming what they are in the education system, because eventually the war ended.

In Pfizer, getting the number one penicillin contract, along with several other pharmacy companies, then, uh, basically still needed to push the pharmaceutical medications that they had been manufacturing through world war II, and that eventually led to them lobbying enough to allow for a vaccine schedule in schools, in the education system.

That's what started that there was no vaccine schedule prior to world war II. And the only reason that it became a thing was because these companies like Pfizer. This is factual and historical.  no emotion added to this. Uh, these companies like Pfizer, who got these large pharmaceutical contracts through world war II lobbying, and eventually implementing these things so they could continue their manufacturing of these pharmaceutical medications and vaccines and did so through the education system.

By making them mandatory four year 5, 6, 7, 10, 15, and 18 year olds to now have at this point 78 vaccines before the age of 18. As a part of the vaccine schedule. So that's your history lesson on osteopathic versus alopathic and homeopathic medicine. Was it all started following world war II and you'll see world war two as being like a really, really consistent theme in these large scale, um, shifts in, in the way that, of our entertainment in the way of our pharmaceutical medications in the way of, uh, You know, our financial systems, uh, you know, so many things came out of world war II.

And I think that that same type of deal, these like huge, unbelievable shifts of wealth and shifts of, uh, societal beliefs and constructs. Came out of world war II. And I think we just saw that too, with the pandemic, when a hundred percent there was so much wealth exchange, there was so many large scale things and you see it with things like the world economic forum meetings, where they're getting together now and saying, how do we implement these things for the future?

Right. They even at the world economic forum meeting, they, I, I watched the entirety of, of, uh, the most important conversations. But they had people like bill gates, they had all of these world leaders there. And one of the thing that they discussed there was utilizing your Google search results. When you, the first thing, when you happens, when you get sick is you go to Google and type in your symptoms.

Now what they wanted to do was utilize all of the data from Google and aggregate it per county, per states, per city, per country.  um, and then use that to identify outbreaks. Now, the way that they do that is by classifying all of the data that's coming in, when you search anything and then putting it together, attaching it to your identity.

And now through your search results, they would know exactly when Joe Schmo down the road from you gets the sniffles and they documented who it was and how, how he did it. And now that individual, like in the case of China, with vaccine passports, for everything, not just COVID. Would now be not allowed to travel because he Googled that he had the sniffles three or five days prior.

So they're gonna start to use your search results, that collective unconscious data they're going to attach it to you as a specific individual. And then they're not going to give you certain rights as a human. If you. Sneezed and you Googled it.  just wild, wild. So that's one major shift that we're gonna start to see is the way that they're utilizing your personal data to implement these types of totalitarian belief systems in governmental structures, like a social credit system, like a vaccine passport and things like that.

Um, so I believe we're seeing that same type of shift again, and it's only time will tell what to, to what extent we're seeing that shift in, in, in monetary, you know, uh, transitions and, and where, you know, we're seeing it right now with gas prices just skyrocketing, right? Skyrocketing. Because at the same time of the pandemic, they're trying to use the, the waters being muddied, your attention, being shifted to other things.

The food shortages, the, the, you know, the gas prices skyrocketing, the, this, the, the, the vaccines, uh, you know, mandate mandates the, you know, um, large amounts of money. That's being pushed over to different countries for proxy wars. Like we're seeing all of these major shifts coming out of the pandemic, just like we saw coming out of world war II, but time will tell to the extent in which it's happening.

All right now, Before we get to the next topic. Cause the next topic's the most interesting topic, which is about Bigfoot skull being found, allegedly  in the Pacific Northwest. All right. Um, so we will get to that just in a moment, we're going to watch a quick video on the individual who actually found this.

Now it's interesting, you know, I, I would, you know, we'll get to in the moment, but the first thing I need you to do, if you didn't do it already is go ahead and hit that subscribe button, hit the five star review. Leave a nice little review. If you're, uh, listening to this through the podcast, go and check it out on YouTube on rumble.

Um, if you're listening to this on TikTok, go subscribe. Uh, because I do this on TikTok live every week as well. So, you know, if you're not watching it on TikTok, go subscribe to my TikTok. If you're on TikTok now, watching this go subscribe to the podcast on apple podcast, Spotify, wherever the hell you get your podcast, red pill revolution.

Um, but next and lastly, I do not have any advertisements on this podcast. I do not work any third parties to do so. Um, I have very little, if any monetization that comes out of this, the only thing that I ask of you is that if you have a family, if you have people who count on you in your life, there's one thing for sure.

That's going to happen to you. You, at some point are gonna die. I'm sorry. If I was the first person to tell. But you're gonna die.  at some point or another, it's going to happen to you? Um, I've had, you know, being young and super healthy. I have no medical conditions. I've had some recent scares with this, you know, I've, I've had some things that came up that, that, you know, concerned me a little bit, eventually found out there was nothing to be scared about.

Um, but I'm 28. I have several children. I have a wife, I have people that count on me. And if that would've happened to me, if I would've died yesterday, not only would it been terrible emotionally on my family, on my children, on, on my friends. But it also, would've been horrible, you know, for anybody who's in that position financially, when you are the primary income earn.

So if you are in that situation, you need to have life insurance because you are gonna. Head over to red pill, revolution.co. Right now I got offered $2 million of life insurance for like $55 a month. It's like $57 60 bucks almost for $2 million. So for a million dollars, just imagine how cheap that would've been too.

Red pill, revolution.coo.com is for losers. And you can get a free quote right there. You don't have to talk to anybody. Normally you're gonna get you go to any other company, any other website, and you try to get life insurance quotes. You're gonna get a shit ton of phone calls and a bunch of people trying to bother you and pitch you on stuff.

I'm not trying to do that. Just go to the website, search it for yourself. If you don't know what type of life insurance to get, I recommend getting a 15 year term policy at 15 times. Your annual. Easy simple. If you need to discuss it further, you can email me Austin, red pill, revolution dot COO, but head over there right now, get yourself a life insurance quote.

This is directly under me, my license. It is not through a third party company. You will see my name on it. This is not an ad for any other company. It is. I have a life insurance license, and if you need life insurance, you should sign up for. Uh, through me to do so, and I would love to help you out. So that's all I got there.

All right. Now, back to motherfucking Bigfoot being found.

so Bigfoot. Now, now this is coming from coyote Peterson. Now, one thing I would like to know is that these individuals were allegedly looking for Bigfoot, which makes this a little sketchy to me. If I stumbled across in the woods while. Going backpacking or on a boy scout strip or whatever the hell people are doing.

It might be a little less sketchy to me that they found it , but apparently they were looking for this and they found a skull. He said that he, or I'll I'll read it from the beginning. It says leaking picks here before they are taken down. And before government officials try to seize our footage. This says, I found a large primate skull in British Columbia.

Filmed it cut. The footage, released it on brave at brave wilderness, which is the account that you can go see the full video of what I'm about to show you guys here, uh, is at brave wilderness on Instagram. Um, you can also, it says this weekend have, uh, I have kept this secret for several weeks. Yes, I have the skull.

I smuggled it through customs and TSA and is currently in a secure location, awaiting primatologist review. Damn absolutely unreal. We, he said, we thought it was a bear skull. When we first found it, I can, 100% guarantee that it is not, the skull was found partially buried underground in deep back forest ravine, after a massive storm in the, in the pack Northwest where clearly a bunch of trees in earth were disturbed.

I'm sure these picks will all be taken down is probably the video by government and the state park officials. But the skull is. I don't know if it's what you all think it might be, but I cannot explain finding a primate skull in the Pacific Northwest without wondering what do you believe? Now, when he pulls up the skull, this is a huge primate skull.

So if you are a, you know, Bigfoot believer, this is like the holy grail of evidence. Like everybody looks back to like the, uh, what is it? The video of the guy, like obviously in a suit, walking across the forest with some guy just so happens to be filming from a, a, a field  right where this big foot walks across just casually and then like, stop.

In looks , it's like the most ridiculous thing ever. Um, but this is pretty interesting, right. Even if it's not the Bigfoot, you know, I, I, I think you kind of have to understand that, you know, it's just a big ass primate, right? That's all the idea of Bigfoot is that's all the idea of like, Yeti are, that's all the ideas of, um, you know, whatever you wanna describe this thing as it's just a big ass primate.

Right. And if they find a big ass primate, Whatever you want to call it, right. It could be a formally, um, extinct type of primate, you know, or maybe there's several left. And what will be interesting to see is dating on this, even if they just decided it's a big ass primate that we didn't know about this discovery.

You could still say it's Bigfoot and you could still say potentially, maybe there's still some around. Um, but that would be interesting. So let's go ahead and watch this video. It's two and a half minutes long of this guy actually discovering the skull. You'll be able to hear it. Um, and you'll be able to see it if you're on YouTube and rumble.

All right. So here we go with the video. We'll watch this and then we will discuss it even further. I haven't watched this yet, so I'm interested to see it just as much as you are. And here we.

All right. So there's two guys walking, three guys walking through a forest prior to this, there was a bunch of drone footage and stuff that they were like kind of zooming over this area. So it seems like they were using the drone to kind of go over areas that were disturbed. Um, now they're kind of just walking up on the area that the drone had just saw the footage of what they believed could have been a skull.

All right. So that's the context of this. Um, prior to this, they go into a little bit about why they're out there and what they're doing. So go over to that, you know, at brave wilderness on Instagram, you'll be able to find the full clip. All right. But let's continue with Adam. We got a minute and a half left.

Cause I'm off that, like I'm.

He says that could be. Ass squash scholar. The first guy says it could be a movie prop, and then he immediately goes to Bigfoot or Sasquatch or Yeti or whatever descriptive term you want to use to describe a huge ass primate that a lot of people have talked about for a long time, which like of all the mythical magical creatures that could or do or possibly have existed.

A Yeti seems to be the most plausible, a Sasquatch, a big foot, whatever the hell you wanna call it, you know, there were big ass dinosaurs. Several, you know, however damn long ago, hundreds of thousands of years ago, there was big ass dinosaurs that walked this earth. Why wouldn't there be at some point in the medium area of T Rexes and humanity and civilization, as we know it today, potentially be maybe a big ass primate that's been around for a while.

so let's see what else they have to say.

So

say somebody shot it in the head. If somebody shot Bigfoot in the head and left it. Die. And didn't go tell somebody about this. So they came and picked it up. That's the, that's a shitty mu move for humanity. If some man was out there and shot this Sasquatch and just left the body there, that's a, that's a, that's a let down.

That's an L for, for the human race, because we should have known about this  or this is not that, and this's just a big ass gorilla, but from the sounds of it, these guys know what they're talking about far more than I. Um, and they seem to be pretty impressed by this, but again, these guys were looking for Sasquatch  to begin with.

So that's where my questioning comes into play. Um, but again, I think of all of the mythical magical creatures that could have existed ever. This one seems to be the most plausible to me. Um, and we have 40 seconds left here. So we'll watch the rest of this. To you

over it. It's not like somebody's gonna come up here and find it. I pick a pin. Okay. We're good.

Go. Anything to do with this, whatever that is. It's not supposed to be. I left my backpack. I'm reach you guys on the trail.

Uh, so foster in the backpack. All right. So that's it. That's all we'll watch. Now, if you go over to brave wilderness at brave wilderness on Instagram, um, you'll see, they have like 306,000 followers. This isn't like some, you know, random account that's posting this. That seems to be fairly confident. They found Bigfoot  or in their, their words.

Uh, a SAS. Um, but you know, it, it's a fairly big account and, and, you know, they have a decent following for this and I haven't, you know, looked a ton through their account, but it doesn't appear to. Completely satirical. And these guys seem to be pretty impressed by what they just found. So time will tell, I, I will be interesting.

This says at the end of the video, they're basically the entirety of this video shows them like finding it, uh, how they found it, why they were out there, what they were doing and then finding it. And then as this guy shoves it into his backpack. Um, they, that he goes on to say that they smuggled it. So he says, um, he's kept it for, uh, a secret for several weeks.

Yes. I have this skull. I smuggled it through customs and TSA, which probably wasn't a smart move to say, to begin with . Uh, but I smuggled it through customs and TSA and it's currently in a secure location. The waiting primatologist review. Absolutely unreal. We thought it was a bear skull. When we found it, I can 100% guarantee it's.

The skull was found partially buried underground in deep backward forest ravine after a massive storm. All right. So this guy smuggled, this. The big foot skull. And then one of the guys says, what happens when they find dinosaur bones? It's like, oh, well they get to keep it.  it's like this guy just, there's probably a hundred different random, uh, rich dudes with actual big foot skulls on their wall above their mantle.

Um,  that? They're like, uh, yeah. Yeah, we know this  but I don't know. Is Bigfoot real? I think the words in the terminology that's used to describe Bigfoot. Yeah. It's probably not this like weird looking. Strolling through the forest and, you know, um, that's the Sasquatch that people have described, but there's probably a big ass PRI it out there that we don't know about.

That's taller than us humans that walks in some funky looking way that could rip us apart in two seconds. Why wouldn't there be like the fact that people are more in disbelief, that there is the potential of a tall ass primate, more so than. Humongous, uh, five or 200, however damn big a T-Rex is like massive chicken.

That was once around eating everything and everybody in its way, like nobody questions, a dinosaur the same way that they question Bigfoot. But Bigfoot is far more believable  than a dinosaur is to me. Now I'm not saying dinosaurs aren't real  but I am saying that the likelihood that Bigfoot or whatever, somebody describes as a tall ass primate.

Could probably be very real, right. We find. I don't know, it's like 1200 new species of bugs a day. I don't know what the actual number is. I just made that up completely off the top of my head, but we find a shit ton of bugs. Every day. We find new fish every day. Now we've probably searched the forest far more than we've searched the ocean, but the fact remains the same.

It's like however many new species a day in the rain forest is, is found. So many different species every single day, but the fact that we have, you know, we just cannot comprehend the idea that there's a tall monkey somewhere that's still around. That's bigger than us.  I don't know. It seems, it seems crazy to me that it's even, uh, you know, this big of the conspiracy world is involved in a tall primate.

Like, it seems like it should be more so a zoologist interest rather than a conspiracy theories interest in, in this tall primate. Um, but. We'll have to see, go to the brave wilderness and follow them and follow along on this. Cuz we'll have to see if they're full of shit. This is probably the biggest news.

I'm not like big into the Sasquatch world of things  but, but I would assume as far as Sasquatch, uh, evidence and, uh, you know, movement towards, uh, the realization that Bigfoot is a thing has been in the last decade. This is probably among the. Findings that could lead to this, you know, potentially being widely accepted.

All right. So on that note, all of you primates out there. I appreciate you. Thank you so much for listening today. Um, I hope you enjoyed the episode. We had some quick rapid fire responses to some articles, but the bigger news is Elon Musk could have potentially set up Twitter in the one of the largest social media companies in the world, trolled them all along, and it will cost him just a.

Billion dollars to do so  we also discussed the fact that there was a man, um, who believes he found a large primate skull or potentially what could be term Sasquatch. Hmm. Interesting. So time will tell, head over to at brave wilderness, give them a follow follow along and see if that's all true. All right.

So again, thank you guys so much for listening. Go ahead and hit that subscribe button, leave a review, press the five stars button. If you're on TikTok, go subscribe to the podcast right now, red pill revolution, and, uh, we will continue our S. There you can actually re-listen to the whole podcast, if you haven't listened to the entire thing at this point, or wanna go back and listen.

Um, and if you're on the podcast, go subscribe to TikTok so that you can actually listen to the episodes live. Cuz we have fun after the episode, every single week I sit around and do, uh, kind of read through some of the comments last week was pretty brutal.  we'll see if this week's is better. Maybe not.

Um, I had some bald dude calling me out about my. But, you know, he didn't seem to be able to grow his own. I don't know. But anyways, I appreciate you guys so much head over to red pill, revolution.co and get a life insurance quote. Um, again, that's the only way that you can support me. Literally, the only way you can also go to the bottom and, and donate.

But the best way you can support me is just by protecting yourself, protecting your family and protecting your assets from the fact that you're gonna die. And you don't want to, you know, leave your entire family pissed off at you for doing so and leaving them in a terrible financial situation. I D. Just a guy, but go to red pill, revolution.co, get a quote there right now and sign up.

It's super easy. It's a 95% approval rating. Uh, it's like anything under a hundred thousand dollars gets approved within like an hour. It's pretty awesome. So head over there, red pill, revolution.co, and get yourself a life insurance policy, cuz your ass is gonna die and you don't want your family to despise you for the financial situation that you left them in.

And that's all. So again, thank you guys so much. I hope you have a wonderful day and welcome to the revolution.

In this week's episode, we discuss Joe Biden's Advisor admitting that the reason for high gas prices is due to having to maintain the "Liberal World Order", We discuss Disney pushing their Trans agenda onto your young children, leading to a discussion about the dark creepy history of other Disney movies. We also discuss the recent sentencing of child pedophiles and sex traffickers Ghislaine Maxwell.

Subscribe and leave a 5-star review!

----more----

Welcome to the revolution.

Hello and welcome to red pill revolution. My name is Austin Adams. Thank you so much for listening today. I appreciate it so much. It has been a little bit since our last episode. Uh, so I'm really excited to jump back into it. I've been literally like itching to do a podcast episode with you guys. There's been so much that has been going on over the last, I don't know.

Uh, several, several weeks, I guess, two and a half weeks now. And, uh, again, I'm really excited to jump into it. So today's episode, we're gonna jump into some of the more interesting topics that have come up over the last several weeks, including, uh, we'll touch on the liberal world order that Biden's, uh, advisor spoke to over the last, uh, I believe it was in the.

Several days. We're also gonna touch on the Baymax situation with Disney. If you're not familiar, Disney had a new series come out, uh, regarding Baymax and Baymax is . Um, what is the movie called? Uh, big hero. Six, if you don't have children, you might not know it, but big hero six was the movie. It's a great movie, but they came out with a series recently where there's some interesting things that they, uh, talk to your children about.

That a lot of people are kind of uncomfortable with, um, some parts of the, uh, trans agenda. So we'll discuss those things today. We're also going to talk on the Joe Biden cue card situation.  if you haven't heard about that, basically they were telling him when to breathe and what to say when to sit down the fact that it was going to be him who is sitting down and not somebody else.

I don't know how you make somebody else sit down, but, uh, yeah, they were very, very specific in their words. So we'll talk about all of that. All right. Before we jump into that, though, I need you to do one thing for me. Go ahead and hit that subscribe button, whether you're on apple podcast, YouTube, Spotify, rumble, uh, wherever you're at right now.

Go ahead and hit that subscribe button. It means the world to me, it takes. Five seconds, five seconds of your time. I know that every day you go through your day, you're trying to look for a way to get some good karma, to feel good about yourself and know that you're doing something for somebody else. And you can do that very easily right now.

And all you gotta do. Just tap, tap, tap that subscribe button real quick for me. All right. The next thing you can do leave a five star review. If you're on apple podcast, if you're on Spotify's YouTube, wherever, leave a five star review, it helps us with the rankings. Again, I appreciate it so much. And that's all I got for you there.

All right. So what we're gonna go into first is going to be the liberal world order that Joe Biden's advisor talked about. And we'll go ahead and watch the clip first. Then we're gonna look at a clip of Joe Biden, actually referencing the same exact world order, uh, at the world economic forum. So we'll look at that clip from back in 2017, I believe it was.

So let's watch this clip. Uh, we'll listen to it together. And then we will look at Joe Biden's clip of him, discussing it back in 2017. And here we go. It's fairly quick. It's like 10 seconds. Um, so here is this clip

 It's sustainable. What do you say to those families who say, listen, we can't afford to pay 4 85 a gallon for months. If not years, this is just not sustainable. Well, we heard from the president today was a clear articulation of the stakes. This is about the future of the liberal world order and we have to stand firm.

So.

 so you heard it right there. This is about the future of the liberal world order. You paying $6. A gallon is about the future of the liberal world order that nobody even wants you to talk about. And you heard it right from the mouth of Joe Biden's advisor there. So that was a question regarding gas prices, right?

They were asking about gas prices. And, uh, the question was basically how long do you expect people to be able to pay this and this, I don't know, airhead advisor, his response was as long as it takes be as long as we can keep up the liberal world order. Well, I don't know about you. I know about my bank account.

I know about my friend's bank account. Family's bank account. None of my family members or friends or anybody gives a shit about the liberal world order. None of them, not a single one. Haven't heard him, you know, Hey, you, you really glad the liberal world orders doing well today, aren't you? No, nobody's talking about that.

Nobody cares. Right? These, this Joe Biden and his advisors are so far removed from the general rep, uh, public that they think you actually care about the liberal world order. If anything, that's a concerning statement, right? For how long have we heard that the new world order is a conspiracy theory, right?

Is, is something that, you know, doesn't exist. And, and, and you're just saying that because, uh, you know, you, you're a conspiracy theorist, a tin foil hat wearing crazy person. And now they're just saying it outright on, I don't know, whatever that was MSNBC or whatever. Um, so the liberal world order is what that advisor just said is the reason that you need to pay six or $7 a gallon for gas.

And again, I don't care about the liberal order world order. I don't care. I don't think you do either. I don't think even liberals care about the liberal world order, especially when they have to pay six or $7 a gallon for gas. It's crazy. Um, so we're gonna go back and we're gonna watch a clip real quick of Joe Biden saying a very similar thing in 2017.

And what you'll notice if you're actually looking at the video format of this is that the background has three interesting words while he's discussing these things. And it says world economic forum. Hmm. If you don't know what the world economic forum is, you don't know who Charles Schwab. Who leads the world economic forum?

Um, it's basically the, the weirdest, uh, star wars, Imperial army. Uh, I don't know, like the legitimate new world order being ran by all of the world governments. 

All right, now Disney had a new series come out, uh, regarding Baymax  this, the wokeness that Disney put into this TV series and I love this show. Like if you've ever seen the big hero, six, show it or movie, it's a great movie.

All you have is go to the new show that they have. And again, this is, uh, the new bay max series and there's two episodes in a row. Two episodes in a row where they have this woke ideology and woke agenda being pushed on your children. Now, I, you know, I don't care what you want to get put in front of your children.

I don't care what you want to teach your children. Honestly, don't teach my children, your ideology at 5, 6, 7 years old. Right? And even if you wanna introduce it be because there's a reason, there's a reason that you are not allowed to advertise to children. You're not allowed to advertise to children because they cannot make sense of what is true and what is false.

They cannot make sense of when somebody is trying to deceive you for profit. Right? So there's literal laws around advertising to children because they know they're susceptible highly susceptible to somebody of authority or somebody like their favorite movie character, pushing an ideology and making something normal that maybe isn't.

Or maybe, you know, shouldn't be pushed on a five to six year old. And again, there's two sides of Disney plus the show's on Disney plus, and there's two sides of it. There's like the parent side in the child's side and the kid's side of Disney plus doesn't have a ton of movies that you would normally let your child watch, right?

Like Moana's not on there. Uh, cars, three Peter pan Dumbo wreck it, Ralph, like all of these, uh, onward, which is another awesome kid's movie. All of these movies that seemingly should be allowed for children that aren't for some obscure reason, but this new bay max series is on the kid size kid side of Disney, the kid size of di side of Disney.

So you start to see in the series very quickly, what they're starting to push. And so we'll watch this clip right here. And what it is is it's this Baymax. If you don't know the, the background of big hero, six big hero, six is a movie about a kid who's, uh, his parents are dead and he lives with his aunt and his brother, his older brother, and his older brother dies in a fire during the movie.

And he's a really smart kid and he makes this robot and his brother has a robot. Who's like super nice and like heals people. I don't know. It's a great movie. You should go watch it a hundred percent. You should go watch it. What you shouldn't watch if you're a child, is the bay max series. Because what they do is they, they place the Baymax, this robot, first of all, which is weird in a Pharmac.

Like a CVS type of deal. And he's asking what type of tampons he should buy. And I think the context of the episode is that he's looking for tampons for some girl who needs them because it's her first period. And again, this is like five to six year olds can watch this because the, the apparent side of it is like seven or eight plus.

So they're expecting five to six year olds to watch this series. And in this series, we'll, we'll go ahead and watch this. Um, he's asking about tampons and there's seven or eight people around him who are answering questions about tampons, which is like, whatever tampons who cares, periods, whatever, like, yeah.

You wanna talk to my kid about how the re you know, how their body works at 7, 8, 9 years old? Honestly, it doesn't rub me the wrong way, as long as you're doing it from a medical perspective, but that's not what they are doing here, because one of the individuals is wearing a shirt that with the trans flag on it, As appears to be a male person of the male sex when they were born.

I'm not assuming their gender , but it appears to be a man in the way that I was brought up, thinking men look based on their appearance, jawline, clothing, voice, testosterone level genitals, I don't know. Um, but here's the story. Here's the, here's the clip right here. And then we'll talk about

 Excuse me. Which of these products would you recommend? Oh, um, well these are the tampons I usually use. Thank you. I prefer pads. They're more comfortable for me. Thank you. I always get the ones with wings. Thank you. Get incented and bleach free. If you can. Thank you, yo, my daughter loves these. Thank you.

These might be easier if it's her first period. Thank you. These are really environmentally friendly.

 what they don't show you. There is that one of the individuals is wearing a transfer is a man and says, this is the type of tampon that I use. Excuse me. Ma'am or sir, don't want to, you know, believe what your pronouns are based on your, uh, actual gender at birth. But I don't know where, where is this person with a trans flag on their shirt?

Putting this tamp? What is it doing for them?  and why are you trying to teach my five, six and seven year olds that periods are, have men have periods, biological men have periods because this was a biological man wearing a transfer in Baymax. Why are you trying to teach my 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 year old? Why are you trying to begin these questions at that age?

Because all you're doing and if again, and if you go back to, there was a book written by a woman, um, I forget the name of it, but she wrote a book basically about how the mental health crisis that was prior to this, uh, era. So let's say between like 2000 and 2016, there was a big manifestation of mental health issues for young women in the area of, uh, anorexia and bulimia.

And so what they saw was a similar drop between 2000 and I think it was 17 and 2021 when trans. Started to become a very popular topic of conversation. Um, what they saw was a very similar drop in the amount of women who were identifying or, or had a mental health issue represent itself in the way of anorexia and bulimia now representing itself in the way of gender dysphoria.

And if you don't know what gender dysphoria is, ask a psychologist because they learned about it in school, in the DSM five, where it outlined what that actually is. And so why are you trying to push? And again, I don't have a problem if you wanna, like, bring this up to a 14, 15 year old in school and represent these ideas and let them know that this is something that's out there.

And this is what people think. And you know, maybe, you know, somebody who's in a situation, but don't try and tell my children that a man can have a period. Don't try and tell my six year old, seven year old, five year old. That the, the actual reproductive organs of a man allow for that situation to happen because you're confusing them.

That's not science, especially when you're claimed to be the party of science. That's not science. A man cannot have a period, period.  it doesn't work that way. I don't have a uterus. I don't have a vagina. I don't have anything. That's shedding its wall or it's lining that's causing, uh, bleeding. I don't have that.

I don't bleed from anywhere once a month. It does not work that way. Sorry to tell you Disney, if you were so far uninformed that you actually believed a man could have a period, they can not. So don't groom my child to thinking that they can. And, and, and so you see it prior in the next episode of this bay max series, because I watched it with my daughter right there in the very next episode is.

Of, um, a show about a guy who ends up asking another guy out on a date. And again, if you wanna do this with like 12, 13, 14 year olds where they're aware of these things, don't do it to a five, six year old. I, I just don't see the place for this, like sexual orientation being brought up to somebody who is literally a toddler Leah toddler two years ago, because you know what you're doing, you know?

Right. And, and then, and again, and I wouldn't have a problem if with this, if it was coming from an independent company, this is literally the biggest entertainment company in the world. You know, the same entertainment company who, when you go back and watch the OG lion king wrote sex in the stars, because they wanted to subconsciously program your children to be hypersexualized.

When it was convenient for them, it's the same company who had the, whatever that guy was from the little mermaid with a boner sitting there with a, another character on his lap. It's the same company. I literally have a list here in an article of all the crazy shit that Disney's done. That's been hyper sexualizing, our children for decades, like 55, 60 years.

Right. And yet you wanna take off Moana wreck it, Ralph, uh, Molan Peter pan and Dumbo, but you're trying to groom my child into believing a man can have a period. What the fuck planet do you live on? And you're trying to like shape my child's reality because that's what you're doing, right? When you're PO positioning your child in the way, when you're teaching them something, you're shaping their reality because they don't know better.

They don't know how these things work. They don't, they haven't been introduced wi by the reproductive system. And all they do is, you know, maybe they watch Netflix, they watch Disney plus they watch a little YouTube and then they speak with the parent. And now they're trying to interject their ideology into your child's mind at five years old, the same way that they were writing sex in the stars.

Hyper sexualizing you at the age of 5, 5, 6, 7 years old. When you were watching the lion king back in the nineties, the same way that they were, you know, they had a Ladin saying, good teenagers, take off their clothes. That was in Aladin. That was literally in the OG Aladin to where they, there was like all this controversy around it.

But Aladin, there was like, everyone has heard the claim. I have the article up here. Everyone has heard the claim that Aladin says, good teenagers, take off your clothes in the balcony scene, where he's about to take Jasmine on a magic carpet ride while it was argued back and forth. For many years, Disney muted the line in his rerelease of Aladin.

Why would you mute a line in the movie unless you believe what it was doing was wrong? Hmm. Now let's look at some other stuff and they literally don't even have Fantasia on the children's Disney side. Like this children's side of Disney. They don't have Fantasia. Fantasia is a literal music based movie from like 1940.

With like lights and all this weird, cool stuff. And like, and this is also the same exact company that had Allison Wonderland. They did multiple movies on Allison Wonderland, which is literally just a movie about tripping balls on shrooms or acid. And you can go watch that on Disney plus right now, yet you want censor Moana in cars, three, like you can't watch cars three on there.

It's it is just so interesting to me that they want to push this ideology on the child side of Disney. Now, again, I don't like if you want to have, and, and I'll play this clip here of the Baymax, like the, the guy asking the other guy out on a date, which is like, cool. I, you know, do your thing again. I, I don't care what you do in your sex life.

I cool. If that's what you do, if that's, you know, your sexuality, I get it 100%. Go ahead and do you, but. I don't think that the same company that's writing sex in the stars should be introducing this to five and six year olds. When at the same time, they're not allowing them to watch cars three in the name of doing the right thing.

So, and then if we go back to the aristocrats aristocrats, right, they, they took that off there. Um, because of it, they, they took, um, what was it? The movie, the rescuers, if you go watch the, the old OG Disney movie, the rescuers in the background on a poster, there's a literal naked woman on the poster, still on Disney plus.

Let's see, what else do we have here from Disney now they took off, uh, the Peter pan. Now the Peter pan one, like they, I think they did the same thing for mul. Like Mulan has, uh, you know, they did it for racist ideology because, um, I don't know what the part about it was for Mulan with Peter pan. They did it because he wore like the feather hats.

Um, and it said the probably the most recent Mo racist moment in the mainstream Disney film is the moment of Peter pan where he a lovely tune explains why native Americans are red in the catchy tune. What makes the red man red? We learned that engines started off as white people. Then they were kissed by girls and turned bright red and the redness never went away.

okay. That's one hell of an origin myth. And when it's delivered by a chorus of natives, why wouldn't a six year old child, believe it. And that last line is important there. Why would a, you know, when it's delivered by a chorus of natives, when it's delivered in a situation where there's seven people standing around Baymax, a literal robot, looking for a tampon.

There's seven people around him shouting out, you know, uh, tips and tricks for how to use a tampon. And then you have a actual man biological man in the trans shirt. Who's throwing his opinion out about how he utilizes tampons. Now, again, let's take the last sentence of this article, where it says when it's delivered by a chorus of, in this case, individuals in the Baymax show, why wouldn't a six year old child, believe it, why wouldn't a six year old child believe that a man can have a period is, and, and why are you gonna confuse a 11 year old girl into believing that, you know, what happens to you happens to him?

And everybody's, you know, it's just, it's not how it works. And we don't live in the fantasy land of Disney, right? And then you get into, you know, even the darker side of Disney, where they find out all of these, you know, all of these, um, sex trafficking rings, where people are being busted as pedophiles in actual Disney world.

And it gets even darker. So I don't know, to me it's bothersome, you know, I just watched that clip with my, I actually watched the show with my daughter and to see that, that Baymax clip where the man is talking about how he utilizes tampons and then immediately follow it up, like back to back episodes.

Um, where, you know, I don't know, again, I don't care what you do. I think you should absolutely have. I think like in onward, the movie with Disney, they actually have a scene where a woman talks about her wife and like, cool, get it cool. A hundred percent. Um, but trans men don't have periods. Men don't have periods, they don't bleed, they don't shut a uterine lining on their, you know, it just doesn't exist.

It doesn't happen. And why are we trying to teach our youth that that's actually a thing it's gross. All right. Now, speaking of gender ideology, Major us airlines to allow gender neutral option on ticket reservations. This is an article from Reuters as of July. First, it goes on to say that major us airlines have agreed to update computer systems by the end of 2024, to allow travelers to purchase tickets with an X gender marker.

An airline trade group confirmed on Friday. Us Senator Ron widen in a letter to airlines for America, chief executive Nick Callio that was seen by Reuters said member airlines committed to the change after he had engaged with the group, a spokesman from the airline group confirmed that widens letter was accurate.

Airlines for America, represents passenger carriers for Delta airlines, United airlines, American airlines, Southwest airlines, Alaska airlines, Hawaii airlines and jet blue airways.  now it goes on to say in March, the Biden administration said that Americans would be allowed to choose an X for gender on their passport applications and select their sex on social security cards.

Now I've said this before, I've said it about the bathroom thing. I've said it about sports. I'll say it about this too. If we're gonna have an X option, why don't we just not ask people's gender? If it no longer is if no longer matters, if we can just be whatever we want any given day, depending on how we feel, why not just have it be not gender, like not genderless.

You're not genderless. Let's just stop asking gender because literally why does it matter what your gender is when I'm traveling on a plane? Are you gonna check and make sure when I walk in the door or through security, and if I don't have a, a penis, you're gonna turn me around. Like, why are we asking this to begin with?

So if you wanna play these silly games, don't make an X. There's no X in gender. It doesn't exist. It's not a thing. There's men and there's women. Those are the only two genitalia that exist in this world. So if we're not checking for anything and there's no reason, same thing with the bathrooms, same thing with sports, right?

If you want sports to be allowed to women, to compete with men and men to compete with women. Cool. Do it fine. Leah Thomas, the number one record breaking swimmer of all time and female NCAA IV league swimming.  when she was number 400 and whatever, you're just gonna see that women's sports become men's sports.

Unfortunately, that's the way that biology works. Men tend to have, you know, better, you know, thicker bone density. They tend to have different muscular structures. If we're gonna say that it doesn't matter what your gender is. If it doesn't matter how your chemical and bodily makeup is and your muscle structure, then just say it doesn't matter.

Don't don't tell me that a woman is a man or a man is a woman, and then can then compete in women's sports and shatter every record ever, cuz you're not living in the real world. So in the same case here, if we're gonna have X on our passports as a gender option, then just don't ask me my gender. Cuz obviously it doesn't matter if I can put an X there just don't ask.

It's a silly thing to do. So it goes on to say that in March the Biden administrations, that Americans would be allowed to choose an X for their gender on their passport applications and select their sex on social security cards. Nobody should have to misgender themselves in order to book a flight widen wrote and by forcing travelers to book their ticket with inaccurate gender information airlines also end up providing inaccurate information to the transportation security administration.

Is it now I want to identify the way that language works, cuz I think this is important to note here when we're talking about gender. That's how the word breaks down. You're talking about the, um, Latin, uh, where the word actually comes from from the Latin language, right? A lot of the American or the English language derives from Latin derivatives and the word gender breaks down to two points within the Latin language, which has meaning itself.

Gender is not, or I'm sorry. Language is not a construct. At least in our sense language from the English language does not just derived from air and we can change the way that words work at any given time. No language is sounds that give meaning, and we have derived the meaning of our sounds based on basic languages that came from before English.

Right? And in this case, Latin is the, is the derivative of much of the English language. So then when we look at the actual derivative of Jen du. It comes from the same derivative of gen it tolls, genitals, gender. You don't just get to make it a construct and change it to be whatever you want. You don't get to put an X there.

Now, if you wanna identify as whatever you wanna wear, whatever clothing you want and say that, you know, you have, you know, go back to the DSM five and talk about that conversation from earlier. That's fine. Do what you wanna do, be who you want to be, wear, what you wanna wear, call yourself, whatever you wanna call yourself.

And I will respect that, but X is not a gender doesn't exist. So let's just call it the same way you can have gender neutral bathrooms. Let's have a gender neutral passport. Maybe it doesn't matter what your gender is to go fly on a plane. It shouldn't, it shouldn't matter at all, what your gender is to fly on a plane.

It shouldn't matter what your gender is to go to a different country. Shouldn't matter the, in the same way that it shouldn't matter what your sexuality is. You shouldn't have to identify your sexuality when you go fly on a plane. One place that it does matter though, is sports because sports have real repercussions, especially when you're talking about contact sports, just in the same way that we saw, you know, um, transgender MMA fighters, literally breaking the face of women without telling them that they were a man and had different bone density and different, different bodily structure and different, uh, muscle tone in structure.

Right. And that's the whole, that's the whole argument. Right? So, so there should be no reason that we have an X on a passport. Okay. Now it goes on to say that widens letter said, member airlines will publish a page on their website detailing the specific steps that non-binary individuals can take to obtain tickets that reflect their gender such as working with a customer service representative who can manually update the gender marker on their ticket.

Widens letter noted that United and American airlines have already changed their booking process to allow travelers, to book tickets with an X gender marker, but not all us airlines have followed their example. The state's department in June of 2021 said that us citizen citizens could select their gender on applications without having to submit medical documentation.

In October, it issued the first American passport with a X gender marker.  what, what does X stand for? The TSA in March said it would implement gender neutral screening at its checkpoints. Now all of you in the comment section here, posting pride flags a hundred percent go pride, right? Pride month, whatever sexuality, whatever trans is not a sexuality.

Trans is a, is a gender issue. It's not a sexuality being gay, being lesbian, being bisexual is a sexuality. They've muddied the water of the L G B community. With the tees go watch the, what is it? The, um, oh, what Dave Chappelle, Dave Chappelle has the literal best comedy bit ever, where he talks about the, uh,

He like breaks it down into where they like all get into an Uber. There's the LS, the GS, the bees. And they're all mad that the tees are trying to hijack their thunder. It's it's such a great construct that he breaks it down as, because the way that they've tried to like hijack the sexuality movement, because it should absolutely be allowed, you should absolutely be able to marry somebody of the same sex should be like, and, and have it be socially acceptable and raise children together adopt like everything a hundred percent, a hundred percent.

But the fact that you want women or men to compete in women's sports and break their fucking face in an MMA fight and not even have to tell the other individual that they're a man and have different bodily and bone structure than the other individuals is a problem. That's a real problem. Again, do what you do sexually, like again, a hundred percent on board with you.

You should absolutely be able to get married. You should absolutely be able to date whoever you want to, but don't expect someone to work their ass off their entire life as a woman in female sports, and then to just be super happy and clapping their hands on the podium. As they take second place by a half a mile to a man who had a severe, severe, um, you know, much better bodily makeup to win that event.

It's unfair. It's not fair. And in the same case here, let's just call it all gender neutral. Right? Let's have a gender neutral league.  for sports. And the problem with that is let's say we mix that. W N B a with the NBA throw LeBron in the w B a throw, you know, what's gonna happen is all of the men are just also going to represent the women's sports.

There's not going to be any women in the sports. And the fact is they're bigger, they're stronger. They, they generally are more athletic because of their bodily makeup. They're faster. Now, literally go. I'm not saying these things frivolously. I'm telling you, if you go look at the Guness book of world records or the Olympic records for any event ever, that is specifically athleticism, you will find that the men generally are faster.

They generally lift more. When it comes to weights, they're more athletic in, in their events. That's the same reason that the us women's Olympic soccer team plays 14 year old boys teams. And, and a lot of times gets beat. That's a thing. I saw a, an actual, uh, athlete from the us women's Olympic team post about it.

and they made a marker, a point of that, the fact that there's a reason that there is differentiations in gender. Now that doesn't exactly pertain to this. That's just a little side note, but let's just call it. Why do we need gender on a passport? Why do we need gender on an airline ticket? It seems stupid.

Right? So if we're gonna play these little games where you can put an X on there, let's just not put gender on there. Why does it matter in the first place? All right. So segues  segues. Um, so another big event that has come out recently, another big topic of conversation has been that Gale Maxwell was sentenced to 20 years in prison in the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking case 20 years, who would've thought.

Now I'm surprised because this article was written on June 26th or June 28th, June 28th, that she has not somehow managed to. Kill herself already magically in a prison with, you know, padded walls. But I'm also surprised that you can get a, a sex trafficking case when you've never actually trafficked it to any individuals who are being charged with the crime in the first place.

Who did she traffick these people to cuz we know there was a big, long black book. Epstein's black book of every individual, uh, videotapes VHS's in boxes, boxes of VHS tapes that were taken from Epstein island, literal names of all the flight logs, not a single individual at all that we've been told of has been prosecuted for having children trafficked to them by Gale max.

So here it goes, it says British socialite turned convicted sex trafficker gal Maxwell finally got her due Tuesday when she was sentenced to 20 years in prison. For her role in helping richen powerful pedophile, Jeffrey Epstein abuse, young girls. Now, what this doesn't mention too, is that she was also accused of raping young girls with him as if you follow the trial you would've saw because there was actually testimony by a, a a, I think it was, uh, guff, G I R a F F E, who testified that she was inappropriately touched.

And Glenn Maxwell was actually a part of these actions that happened on the island and was a part of grooming them and actually exploiting them sexually goes on to say that us district judge Allison Nathan said the sentence of 240 months was sufficient and not greater than necessary for Maxwell who appeared, who earlier addressed the court and told victims in a halfhearted apology.

I am sorry for the pain that you experienced. Yeah. Okay. As she finally learned her faith, the 60 year old predator's face remained inscrutable and she briefly hugged her attorneys before leaving the courtroom, wearing blue jail scrubs, her dark brown locks cut in a Bob  in her ankles and shackles. She did not speak to her siblings who were seated in the row behind her.

The number of people harmed is impossible to measure said victim Annie farmer, who testified at trial, told the court during Tuesday's hearing as Maxwell, shoulders, tensed the Epstein. Madam tried to avoid looking at her victims as they spoke, but she did lock eyes with Sarah ransom. When her victim told her you broke me in unfathomable ways, but you didn't break my spirit nor did you dampen my internal flame that now burns brighter than ever.

And it's amazing how we got so much coverage, so much coverage of how many trials over the last, how, you know, year and a half between Kyle written house. And like, we've literally never had more celebrity trials than we've had in the last, I don't know, seven months, all these huge, you know, inside the courtroom Hollywood ask type events.

And then speaking of that, Nancy Pelosi hiring a literal, uh, you know, director of movies to try and put a, a celebrity ask spin on the January 6th trials, which I think are still going on today. I don't know nobody's watching them and nobody really cares cuz everybody knows that.  potentially set up by the FBI as pointed to, by Ted Cruz who interviewed the CIA director assistant of national security.

I don't know some long name where she's, you know, if you recall, I put out a video on it where she goes, you know, I can't answer that. You know, did you guys insight violence on January 6th? I can't answer that. Did you guys have agents present who were pro uh, provocateurs to attempt to get into the capital building?

I can't answer that. Well, why can't you answer that? Well, you can't answer that because you know the answer's yes. And then we saw, what was it? Ray apps, right? Ray apps. You go back and look at Ray apps. And Ray apps was the individual who I put in my video who was going into the capital into the cap. We gotta go in there, you know, and then no out of everybody, who's literally still sitting in a white jail cell right now in the bottom of Joe Biden's, uh, white house.

Being held by the CIA secretly, allegedly, uh, Ray a is still sitting on his, you know, a hundred acre farm with a golf cart, not facing any charges when there's actually footage of him telling people the day before that they have to go into the capital. I don't know. I digress, but it's all a conspiracy theory.

I don't actually believe any of that. Um, it says Maxwell's defense attorneys. Meanwhile, I don't know how we got into that. Um, Maxwell's defense attorney. Meanwhile had begged for leniency saying she should get no more than four to five years. Wow. For raping and sex trafficking, dozens, if not hundreds of young women in a literal Ponzi scheme of pedophilia, if you look back, if you go watch the documentary, which I started and didn't finish because it made me sick to my stomach, having to watch this and all the horrific things that they did to these kids.

But if you go back the way that they did it is they literally recruited it. Like it was a multi-level market. They would get one girl in the school to go back and recruit other girls from the school to go back and recruit other girls from the school. And they would pay them money for every girl that they brought in to give massages to these old men.

And eventually they would be sex traffick to an island of celebrities. And their parents were like, it was just so gross, but it was like a multilevel, literally like a multi-level market, like the Avocare of pedophilia and Glenn Maxwell ran it all, literally ran ital was the one who convinced the girls would go into the, you know, go buy the schools and pick these girls up, would have them in the room with her and then actually sexually assault them the way that they were outlined within that as well.

So it goes on to say that her sentence marked to the end of a lengthy criminal proceedings that started after Maxwell's arrested a sprawling New Hampshire estate in July of 2020, prosecutors brought the charges against Maxwell months after Epstein, her former partner in crime killed himself. In Manhattan jail cell while awaiting trial on sex trafficking, raps today's sentence holds gal Maxwell accountable for perpe perpetrating heinous crimes against children, us attorney of the Southern district of New York Navy and Williams said in the statement, this sentence sends a strong message that no one is above the law and is never too late for justice.

Maxwell's attorney Bobby stern Heim. And if you watched any of the trials like, or if you listen to the, um, actual, uh, outlines of the trials, or like what was actually said, it was dis this woman was disgusting. She literally related Jeffrey Epstein to James Bond in her opening statement, literally called him a modern day.

James Bond in her opening statement about sex trafficking children for pedophilia. It goes on to say, in addition to the prison term, she also imposed a $750,000 fine on Maxwell who could potentially get credit for the two years she's already spent behind bars or have some of her time shaved off for good behavior.

That's terrible. I don't think there's any amount of good behavior that overcomes you. Literally sex trafficking, children for profit, and then also sexually assaulting them. It also says that her attorneys requested that she serve out her time at the federal prison in Danbury, Connecticut. The low security women's lockup that served as the inspiration for Netflix.

Orange is the new black, the, uh, Oxford educated Aris and daughter of late publishing tycoon. Robert Maxwell, who spent much of her life hobnobbing  with the rich and famous hobnobbing. That's an interesting term, um, was convicted of sex trafficking. Now, if you don't know anything about Gale Maxwell's dad, that's another interesting conversation.

Gale Maxwell's dad was alleged. A agent for the Maad, which is like a secret intelligence agency. Um, for, I think it's like Saudi Arabia or something like that, or the Saudi princes, I don't know. Um, but he also purchased, uh, the books. Um, what is it? It's uh, McGraw hill, Gale Maxwell's dad bought McGraw hill EV you know, every single textbook ever that you ever got ever in high school that had McGraw hill on it was owned by Gale Maxwell's dad, who at one point considered changing the name to Maxwell, but then didn't do so in fear that it would come back on him and who his actual, you know, his background was, but owned McGraw hill.

And I believe still does today. Like that family still owns McGraw hill, which is literally every textbook ever in both high school, middle school, elementary school, and college. Every person out there right now can identify with that book company, McGraw hill is owned by Gale Maxwell's dad. You know, the Gale Maxwell who, and it's like, I think our dad actually died.

Got pushed off. Well, didn't get pushed off, fell off of a boat, his yacht in like the middle of the ocean, uh, mysteriously that family's nuts. And you look back at their background. The sister of gal Maxwell, like was one of the very first internet technology tycoons who came out with a search engine or some shit back in the early nineties and became a billionaire off of it.

It's crazy. When you look into the history of Gale Maxwell in her family goes on to say that, uh, four women testified at her publicized, highly publicized trial and not enough, highly publicized as, uh, you know, pirates of the Caribbean actor over, uh, minor spousal abuse. But the widely publicized trial in Manhattan, federal court, and two of them, several other accusers also addressed the court Tuesday, calling out on the judge to lock Maxwell up and throw away the key.

They hailed the sentence that Nathan opposed with one Elizabeth Stein calling it vindication in validation, Virginia guff Roberts, which is the individual I was talking about earlier, who had long accused Maxwell and Epstein of trafficking, her to Britain's prince Andrew described Maxwell like a Wolf in sheep's clothing in her letter to the court.

Yeah, it's interesting. How, uh, prince Andrew per Andrew literal royalty was accused during this trial of sexually abusing a girl who is in the trial under oath. And he's sitting free somewhere right now, probably on a different island, sexually assaulting other young children. Like how, what the fuck kind of world is this.

Says, um, she went on to say that Gale, you deserve to spend the rest of your life in the jail cell. She wrote you deserve to be trapped in a cage forever. Just like you trapped your victims. Kate, a former British model who also used her first name and testified at trial said Maxwell and Epstein's victims are unified to bring justice to a common enemy.

No person should be shielded from the consequences of their actions. Case said, calling Maxwell, a manipulative and cruel person who has shown a lack of remorse for how she ruined the lives of countless women and children staring at Maxwell. She said today I can look at gal Elaine and tell her that I became what I am today in spite of her and her efforts to make me feel powerless and insignificant the disgrace socialite, who has denied that she abused.

Anyone has remained, locked up in Brooklyn's metropolitan detention center for nearly two years since her bust and throughout her month long trial. Federal prosecutors at trial portrayed Maxwell as a sophisticated predator who was inextricably linked to Epstein, including in his pursuit of gross to sexually abuse from 1994 to 2004, it goes on to show a literal picture of prince Andrew with Virginia guff with Gale Maxwell smirking behind her Maxwell was Jeffrey Epstein's right hand said, assistant us attorney general, or us attorney Allison Moe.

As she said in her clothing, state closing statements in December 20th, Maxwell and Epstein were partners. She said they were partners in crime who sexually exploited young girls together. So ding dong the witch is dead bitches. Glenn Maxwell is in jail for at least 20 years. Well, at the most 20 years, which I think is insignificant, I think she should literally be given a 40 year sentence and on good behavior, have the opportunity to be out when shes.

125 years old. I think that, uh, 20 year state, uh, sentence for all of the horrific things that she did is unjust. And eventually we'll either see that, you know, maybe she's gonna wind up hanging herself in her prison cell that with padded walls, with, you know, the video being cut at exactly the right time with while on suicide watch , or maybe we'll see her, uh, get out on good behavior after seven years, which I think is the more likely of the scenarios.

All right. And then the last article that we're going to talk about, because it just caught my eye based on all of the weirdness and diet today, um, is going to be this one by New York post, which says that vegan mom starved her toddler to death with diet of raw vegetables and fruits. This was on July 1st, 2022 written by the New York post goes on to say that a Florida vegan mother has been found guilty of murdering her 18 month old son after only feeding him raw fruits and vegetables.

Sheila O'Leary 39 years old is facing life in prison after a jury life in prison after, uh, convicted her Wednesday of murder in a string of child abuse charges over 2019 death of her toddler, Ezra O'Leary her little boy weighed just 17 pounds, seven pounds below average. When his parents noticed he had stopped breathing O'Leary and her husband, Ryan O'Leary told police that Azara followed a strict vegan diet, but that he was also breastfed.

They said the boy hadn't eaten in the, for about a week prior to his death and was having trouble sleep. An autopsy found the little boy died of malnutrition complications. Prosecutors accused the mother of failing to seek proper medical care for her son. When she realized he was ill, she to, she chose she's.

She chose to disregard his cries assistant state attorney. Sarah Miller said she didn't need a scale to see his bones. She didn't need a scale to hear his cry. Prosecutors added that the couple had also been neglecting their three children all under the age of 11. When Ezra died, we're here because their children were starving so much that the youngest starved to death, like that's horrible.

And there's this like the, this situation with all of these fad diets and you see it every day with like all of the individuals who are out there who are literally like the vegan cat hashtag on Instagram.  where people try to feed their cat, who is a carnivore lettuce. Um, like all these little crazy people that are out there, uh, because they're vegan, like somehow, you know, they're, they're helping the world by not feeding their cat, the proper nutrition that they need.

So we see it here with this woman who obviously tried to impose her, her nutritional ideology onto her infant at a very young age, in this horrific incident. Um, I just can't imagine what a 17 pound 18 month old would look like. And to know how long she must have known that he was, you know, not given the proper nutrition.

Uh, but that's just so frustrating to read. And, and again, it comes back to like literally fad diet, you really fat diets. Your toddler does not need to be vegan. Your toddler needs proper nutrition. It needs protein. It needs much more than raw vegetables and fruit. But I would say if that's all this, like if she just literally just didn't feed him proper nutrients and he died, that's horrible.

And she definitely deserves to be treated as such and to go to jail for. Uh, not giving her child proper nutrition, but a life sentence for that compared to 20 years for gal Elaine Maxwell, who purposefully sexually assaulted in trafficked young women for decades to Hollywood and political elites, at least that's similar, at least that's comparable.

And so the fact that Gale Maxwell got 20 years and this woman's facing a life sentence, you know, if that's the only thing to the story, I don't know what the other types of, of, you know, um, you know, improper care that was going on here was, but if that's it and they were just improperly feeding this child, now, obviously the child died and that's horrific and, and this is a terrible situation.

Um, but if the mother wasn't just actually starving her child with purposeful intent to. Kill her child off and was feeding them just the wrong diet was an absolute idiot and had no idea of how nutrition works or to look at a child and know that they're obviously in need of better nutrition standards.

I dunno it still, it still seems to me as if maybe there should at least be a comparable standard anyways, um, on that note kind of a negative way to, to, to end off here.  but it's good to be back. Thank you guys so much for joining me. I appreciate you so much. Um, I hope you enjoyed today's episode, uh, and we will be back again a second time this week for another episode, cuz I have lots.

Lots to talk about. So, um, again, thank you so much for listening. I appreciate you so much. Go ahead and hit that subscribe button right now, head over to red pill, revolution.co, and make sure that you're not leaving your children, your spouse, your wife, your husband, um, without the proper financial backing, if you do die, because one thing is for sure, every single person that's listening to this.

Every single person that's watching, this has loved ones and is also going to die. And you can at least alleviate some aspect of that by making sure that you financially take care of them with life insurance, red pill, revolution.co.com is for losers again. Um, five star review. I appreciate you so much hit that subscribe button.

Have a great rest of your day. If you are listening to this, uh, in the, um, as it was put out, it is the 3rd of July, uh, when I'm recording this in 2022. So happy fourth, I hope you enjoy your weekend and have a great day. Welcome to the revolution. Thank you.