J. Richard Gott discusses the theoretical physics of time travel and whether it's scientifically possible. Gott examines solutions to Einstein's equations that permit time travel including rotating universes and cosmic strings. The conversation explores the grandfather paradox and other logical problems time travel creates. Gott discusses the concept of closed timelike curves and the physics allowing travel to the past. The discussion addresses practical challenges of building a time machine including the energy requirements and exotic matter needed. Gott examines evidence from quantum mechanics suggesting time's nature differs from common intuition. The broadcast explores whether time travelers from the future might already be present in our era. Gott discusses the implications of time travel for causality, free will, and the nature of reality. The conversation addresses whether physics fundamentally forbids time travel or merely makes it extremely difficult. Gott examines what time travel would mean for history, determinism, and whether the future already exists. The discussion explores the cutting edge of theoretical physics investigating time's deepest mysteries.

Linda Moulton Howe investigates bioterrorism threats before Chris Ruddy discusses investigative journalism. Howe examines the anthrax letters targeting media and government officials in October 2001. The conversation explores the weaponization of anthrax and the expertise required to produce weapons-grade spores. Howe discusses whether the anthrax attacks connect to September 11th or represent a separate threat. Ruddy examines investigative journalism in the internet age and the changing media landscape. The discussion addresses bioterrorism preparedness and the public health response to anthrax exposure. Howe investigates the origin of the anthrax used in the letters and evidence about the perpetrator. Ruddy discusses his investigative work on various stories and the challenges of finding truth in complex events. The broadcast explores the fear and disruption bioterrorism creates beyond the actual casualties. Howe examines worst-case bioterrorism scenarios and the potential for catastrophic releases of engineered pathogens. The conversation addresses the investigation into who sent the anthrax letters and their motivations.

Ralph Sarchie discusses his work as a New York police officer investigating demonic cases and performing exorcisms. Sarchie recounts specific cases where he encountered genuine possession and dark supernatural forces. The conversation explores how Sarchie distinguishes between mental illness, criminal behavior, and authentic demonic activity. Sarchie discusses his training in demonology and the Catholic exorcism tradition he practices. The discussion addresses the physical dangers exorcists face and the spiritual warfare involved in confronting demons. Sarchie shares his most disturbing cases and the evidence convincing him of evil's objective reality. The broadcast examines the theological understanding of demons and Satan's role in human affairs. Sarchie discusses warning signs of demonic oppression and possession. The conversation addresses skeptical explanations for possession phenomena versus Sarchie's firsthand experiences. Sarchie examines the connection between violent crime and demonic influence in his law enforcement work. The discussion explores whether evil represents merely human depravity or involves supernatural malevolent intelligence actively working against humanity.

Sean David Morton discusses Delphi Associates' analysis and predictions following the September 11th attacks. Morton examines what his sources and psychic intelligence reveal about the attacks' perpetrators and their motivations. The conversation explores Morton's predictions about America's response and the likely course of military action. Morton discusses warnings he claims to have issued before September 11th and why they weren't heeded. The discussion addresses Morton's forecasts about future terrorist threats and whether additional attacks are imminent. Morton examines the geopolitical implications of the attacks and how the event transforms global power dynamics. The broadcast explores Morton's predictions about the war in Afghanistan and potential expansion to other theaters. Morton discusses the economic consequences of September 11th and his forecasts about market recovery. The conversation addresses the spiritual dimension of the crisis and what it means for humanity's evolution. Morton examines his sources of information combining psychic perception with intelligence analysis. The discussion explores whether the attacks could have been prevented or represented inevitable events.

Major Ed Dames discusses remote viewing the September 11th attacks and what intelligence this method revealed. Dames examines whether remote viewing detected the plot beforehand and why such information wasn't acted upon. The conversation explores what remote viewing sessions after the attacks reveal about the perpetrators and their organization. Dames discusses remote viewing findings about Osama bin Laden's location and Al Qaeda's structure. The discussion addresses the challenge of actionable intelligence from remote viewing versus traditional intelligence gathering. Dames examines his remote viewing of future threats and whether additional attacks are planned. The broadcast explores the potential for remote viewing to support counter-terrorism operations. Dames discusses the government's historical use of psychic espionage and whether such programs continue. The conversation addresses Dames' predictions about America's response and the coming war in Afghanistan. Dames examines long-term threats revealed through remote viewing including WMD terrorism and future conflicts. The discussion explores whether remote viewing could have prevented September 11th if properly utilized.

David Hagberg discusses his thriller novel "Joshua's Hammer" featuring a plot eerily similar to the recent attacks. Hagberg examines the fiction versus reality convergence as his terrorism novel anticipated actual events. The conversation explores the research Hagberg conducted into terrorism threats that informed his fictional scenario. Hagberg discusses the publishing industry's response to the September 11th attacks and whether fiction depicting terrorism remains appropriate. The discussion addresses how thriller writers imagine future threats and whether intelligence agencies should pay attention. Hagberg examines the psychology of terrorists and the motivations driving individuals to commit mass murder. The broadcast explores whether fiction can help prepare society for emerging threats or inadvertently provides roadmaps for criminals. Hagberg discusses the responsibility of authors dealing with terrorism plots in the post-September 11th environment. The conversation addresses the cathartic value of fiction processing traumatic events versus concerns about glorifying violence. Hagberg examines his next book and how recent events influence his approach to writing thrillers.

Open lines examines the question of whether America should go to war following the September 11th attacks. Callers debate the appropriate response to terrorism and whether military action serves long-term interests. The conversation explores alternatives to war including diplomacy, intelligence operations, and targeted strikes. Callers discuss the risks of widening conflict and potential consequences of invading Afghanistan. The broadcast addresses concerns about civilian casualties and whether war creates more terrorists than it eliminates. The discussion examines the coalition building efforts and which nations support U.S. military action. Callers debate the balance between justice for the dead and practical considerations about war's effectiveness. The conversation addresses the Taliban's refusal to surrender Osama bin Laden and diplomatic efforts to avoid war. The broadcast explores the potential for protracted conflict in Afghanistan's difficult terrain. Callers share diverse perspectives on whether war represents the right choice or a tragic mistake. The discussion captures the national debate about how America should respond to unprecedented attack.

Craig O. Thompson discusses nuclear, biological, and chemical warfare threats in the post-September 11th environment. Thompson examines the vulnerability of American cities to WMD attacks and the challenges of detecting such weapons. The conversation explores the effects of different NBC weapons from nerve agents to bioweapons to radiological dispersal devices. Thompson discusses the preparedness of emergency response systems and the public health infrastructure for mass casualty events. The discussion addresses the availability of NBC weapons to terrorist organizations and rogue states. Thompson examines detection technologies and defensive measures to mitigate NBC attack consequences. The broadcast explores the particular threats posed by biological weapons including anthrax, smallpox, and engineered pathogens. Thompson discusses the psychology of NBC terrorism and the goal of creating mass panic. The conversation addresses what individuals can do to prepare for potential NBC attacks. Thompson examines the likelihood of terrorists deploying WMDs versus conventional explosives and the strategic calculations involved.

Four days after September 11th, callers continue processing the attacks and debating America's response. The broadcast examines the Bush administration's preparation for military action against Afghanistan. Art facilitates discussion about the authorization for use of military force working through Congress. Callers debate the wisdom of war versus alternative approaches to addressing terrorism. The conversation addresses the rescue efforts at Ground Zero and the diminishing hope for survivors. The broadcast examines airline security failures that allowed hijackers to board planes with weapons. Callers discuss profiling, surveillance, and the civil liberties implications of enhanced security measures. The discussion explores America's relationship with Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern nations. The program addresses the challenge of fighting non-state terror networks with conventional military force. The conversation captures the national mood as America prepared for war while still mourning the dead. The broadcast documents the transition from immediate crisis response to planning long-term action against global terrorism.

The third day following the September 11th attacks features continued caller reactions as details emerge. The broadcast examines the developing narrative about the 19 hijackers and their connections to Al Qaeda. Art facilitates discussion about Osama bin Laden and Afghanistan's Taliban government harboring terrorists. Callers express diverse views on appropriate military response and the balance between security and civil liberties. The conversation addresses the human stories emerging from Ground Zero and the Pentagon. The broadcast examines the airline industry's shutdown and when flights might resume. Callers discuss the economic impact of the attacks and fears about additional strikes. The discussion explores unity across America as people rally together following the tragedy. The program addresses conspiracy theories already emerging and the need for factual information. The conversation captures the national mood as initial shock transforms into determination to respond and prevent future attacks. The broadcast documents how America processed trauma and prepared to strike back.