The Bio Report

As 2015 came to a close, Congress passed a package of tax extenders that among other things expanded the Research and Development Tax Credit and made it permanent. The move represents a big win for innovation-based industries, but the life sciences in particular, which will benefit from a new provision that allows companies to capitalize on the credit ahead of producing revenue. We spoke to Dan Mennel, California Market Leader of Strategic Federal Tax Services for Grant Thorton and Matt Gardner, CEO of the California Technology Council, about the R&D tax credit, what it does, and what it means for the life sciences.

The year 2015 was another big one for biotech with record dealmaking, big drug approvals, and solid performance, but it somehow didn’t feel as good as it looks on paper. Pricing concerns that garnered big attention are expected to grow in intensity in the new year with the presidential election and negotiations for the renewal of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act. We spoke to Adam Feuerstein, senior columnist for TheStreet.com, about the year in biotech, the highs and lows, and what’s ahead in the new year.

Growing costs pressures, the integration of technology, and the transformation of the patient into a healthcare consumer is giving rise to a new health economy. In its report on the top health industry issue for 2016, PwC highlights the forces expected to have the most impact on the industry in the coming year. We spoke to Karla Anderson, principal of U.S. pharmaceuticals and life sciences for PwC, about the report, how an increasing emphasis on value is reshaping the sector, and what’s in store for 2016.

Despite a record number of new drug approvals this year, the return on R&D investment for the largest pharmaceutical companies continues to fall, according to a new report from the Deloitte Centre for Health Solutions and Deloitte’s R&D services group. In fact, the report finds R&D returns for this group of companies have fallen to their lowest point since Deloitte began tracking them in 2010. We spoke to Neil Lesser, principal with Deloitte Consulting in the Life Sciences strategy practice and a leader in the Research & Development strategy practice, about the report, the pressures on the industry that are hurting returns, and what R&D strategies companies can pursue that might reverse the trend.

Retail prices for more than 100 widely used specialty drugs rose nearly 11 percent in 2013, according to a new report from AARP Public Policy Institute. The report found that the average annual cost of a specialty drugs used to treat chronic diseases rose to more than $53,000 — greater than the U.S. median income and more than twice the $23,500 median income of people on Medicare. We spoke to Leigh Purvis, director of health services research in AARP’s Public Policy Institute about the report, trends that are fueling demand for these drugs, and whether there are public policy solutions to rein in rising drug prices that can be implemented without harm to innovation.

A team of biohackers is developing the first open source protocol to produce insulin simply and economically. The hope is that their work will serve as the basis for generic production of insulin and provide a foundation for continued research into improved versions of the life saving biologic. We spoke to Anthony Di Franco, co-founder of the Open Insulin project and a board member of Counter Culture Labs, about the work, the challenges they are encountering, and whether the DIY movement can teach the corporate world anything about cost-effective innovation.

A large number of clinical trials underlying the approval of drugs never come into public view. This not only has legal and ethical ramifications, but implications for the healthcare system as a whole. We spoke to Jennifer Miller, founding president of Bioethics International and assistant professor at the NYU School of Medicine about her recent study in BMJ Open, part of an effort to improve transparency through the creation of a Good Pharma Scorecard. Miller discussed the study, the scorecard, and the state of transparency in the pharmaceutical industry.

The power of genetic engineering will soon be available for the home thanks to the Amino One, a piece of hardware about the size of a laptop computer that would allow users to manipulate the DNA of microorganisms for productive purposes or just plain fun. We spoke to Julie Legault, founder and CEO of Amino One’s creator Amino Labs, about the device, its target market, and the implications of putting the tools of synthetic biology into the hands of kids.

New gene editing technologies are expanding the ease and power with which scientists can manipulate biological systems with the promising of addressing not only human health issues, but problems the plant faces with regards to food, fuel, and the environment. But while much of the concerns raised about the potential consequences of this technology have focused on its use in humans, Elizabeth Alter, assistant professor of biology at City University of New York’s York College, argues its potential environmental implications will likely be far more significant. We spoke to Alter about her recent op-ed in The New York Times, the need for public discussion about the technology, what should be done today as we work through broader questions of policy.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission last week finalized rules on crowdfunding that opens the door for the participation of non-accredited investors. The rules complete a long process for the commission set into motion by the passage of the JOBS Act. We spoke to Richard Swart, director of research for the Program for Innovation in Entrepreneurial and Social Finance at the University of California at Berkeley and chief strategy officer for the crowdfunding investment site NextGen Crowdfunding, about the new rules, how this will change the investment landscape, and what it all means for the biotech industry.