Darrell Castle discusses the recent election in the United Kingdom as well as recent acts of terrorism there and the lack of response to those acts. Transcript WAR OF VALUES Hello this is Darrell Castle with today’s pod cast. Today is Friday June 16, 2017 and on today’s pod cast we will primarily be discussing the recent elections in the UK as well as acts of terrorism in the old world. There are many things we could be discussing as the world lurches from one disaster to another such as the recent shooting of four people by a former member of Bernie Sanders’ campaign team. When left wing propaganda sites spew out their rhetoric 24/7 because they will not respect the will of the people and when left wing politicians themselves refuse to rebuke assassination parodies, etc and when their rhetoric as well as their actions is a continual incitement to violence perhaps it’s because they want someone to act on their words, and this time someone did. Today however, we turn our attention to the recent election in the UK in which the Conservative Party under Theresa May received 48’9% of the vote compared to the Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn which received 40.3%. This was a disaster for Ms. May and her Party which will now have to accept a coalition partner with which it only partially agrees in order to achieve a majority and thus be able to govern under British Parliamentary rules. The British system is different from ours in that there’s no President and no Senate, only a House with the Speaker of the House running things as Prime Minister, and other House members are in his cabinet. There are 650 seats in the British parliament so it takes 326 seats to achieve a majority. That has to be achieved by one party or by a coalition of parties which can then go to the Queen to formalize a new government. Before the election the Conservatives held a majority of six or 331 seats. They lost 12 so they have 3 19 and the Prime Minister had to go to the Irish Union Party for ten votes giving them a 4 vote majority. The Irish Unionists make up those who originally favored Union with Great Britain in the long struggle between the two countries.  They are pro EU and want a “soft Brexit” which means still in the EU economic zone with EU open border rules which will give migrants a clear back door into Britain. This is all the result of Ms. May’s apparent political mistakes in calling for the snap election in the first place and of her reaction to recent terrorist attacks especially.  She was appointed after the resignation of David Cameron who resigned because he opposed Brexit, and she wanted to be elected to shore up her bargaining position with the EU bureaucrats. There have been 3 fatal terrorist attacks in Britain in the last 3 months. The first at Westminster Bridge left 5 dead, the second at the Arianna Grande concert left 22 dead and the most recent at London Bridge left 8 dead for a total of 35. The London Bridge attack was a truck into a crowd of people and then 3 Muslims jump out with knives and start stabbing people. There were reports of a young woman being stabbed 12 to 15 times while begging for help. There was no help because the British people are unarmed in the face of this invading enemy. Finally one lone and very brave but also unarmed police officer tried to intervene with his baton and he was hospitalized in critical condition for his trouble. The politicians all said nice things about him and gave him a medal but a hand gun with proper training could have saved a lot of lives. The tepid reaction from Ms. May probably cost her Party its majority. All she has are words, no real action to combat the attackers, just words i.e. enough are enough, but we can’t abandon our human rights to hunt these terrorists oh but her most important idea is regulation of the internet. Regulation of the Internet is supposed to control terrorist communications.  There seems to be no concept of Brittan in mortal danger with the enemy inside th...

Darrell Castle speaks about President Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Paris Climate Change Agreement and the world’s reaction to that decision. Transcript BACKING OUT OF PARIS Hello this is Darrell Castle with today’s Pod Cast. Today is Friday June 9, 2017 and on today’s pod cast we are going to be discussing the decision by President Donald Trump to fulfill one of his campaign promises and withdraw America from the Paris Agreement on Climate Change signed last year by then President Barack Hussein Obama. The Agreement was designed to limit and eventually end fossil fuel energy production in the world. Anyone can see that it is not in America’s best interest to do that since doing so would damage the American economy and destroy the jobs of many people. I’ve seen estimates of about 8 million jobs in the US. The agreement was signed by all but two nations those being Nicaragua and Syria. All 195 nations besides those two signed the agreement. It had the appearance then of being universal, but it was only universal in appearance not in application. For example, the United States agreed to reduce emissions by 26% over 15 years while China, one of the world’s biggest polluters, agreed only to work toward stopping emissions from rising by 2030. Chinese emissions could continue rising until then and China would still be in full compliance. So there is no enforcement provision, no penalties for non-compliance and therefore no way to gain compliance from reluctant nations except possibly peer pressure. The primary downside mechanism to the agreement is obvious and that is that prosperous, productive, successful and developed countries are punished much more severely than the others. Successful countries are expected to loot their populations and ruin their lifestyles to comply with demands for them to severely cut back energy and manufacturing sectors. The agreement is just that, an agreement, not a treaty. President Obama did not choose to go through the process of treaty ratification which would have required a 2/3 senate approval, and it therefore has no real legal force. All this talk about the content of the Agreement is not to delve into the actual words of the agreement, but instead to set up the real purpose of this discussion and that is the reaction to President Trump’s decision to do what he clearly said he would do and what 62 million or thereabouts elected him to do. Pulling out of the agreement was a gesture to his America first promises. There is nothing in this agreement for America and he recognized that. His “I was elected to represent the people of Pittsburgh not Paris” comment  is evidence that he recognized the fact that this agreement was just another move by the globalists who control the European Union and possibly the United States as well. The completely out of control reaction to the pullout comes from two viewpoints;  ignorance because some people actually believe that Donald Trump is responsible for everything bad that has happened or ever will happen. If you think that is an exaggeration I will clarify it for you in a moment. The other half of the out of proportion reaction is fear that others will now have the courage to follow suit, Just as Marine Le Pen’s election in France could have started a movement out of the EU. The globalists are afraid of any challenge to their control filtering down to the herd. The reaction or over reaction then is also a gesture just as pulling out was a gesture. President Obama’s legacy is at stake. His dream of a world with socialism forced on the unwilling is at stake,  a Euro-Centric one world central government is also at stake so the herd has to be kept in line unless they want to experience the same criticism and ostracism. Even if everything the climate change people say they fear was a reality this agreement would do nothing to solve it. According to estimates I’ve read from people I trust who have dissected the actual agreement,

Darrell Castle talks about the Manchester bombing along with President Trump’s message delivered in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. TRANSCRIPT MANCHESTER  AND THE PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE TO MUSLIMS Hello this is Darrell Castle with today’s podcast. Today is Friday June 2, 2017 and on today’s podcast we will be discussing the recent terrorist bombing attack conducted against people attending a rock or pop concert in Manchester, England. The performer at the concert was Arianna Grande, apparently a huge American star who appeals primarily to early teen girls. Salman Abedi, age 22, acting in the name of the religion of peace, strapped a bomb lined with nails to his chest and walked into the arena where thousands of people including many children were enjoying the concert and blew himself up. The explosion created instant carnage with 22 dead and over 100 wounded. Many of the wounded were critical and may have died since the last report of casualties. There were many stories of families picking nails from the faces of their daughters after the blast. Nothing gets to people like attacking their children. As my pastor once said, “you’re only as happy as your saddest child.” Mr. Abedi’s parents immigrated from Libya to the UK in the 1980’s to escape, they said, the repressive regime of Moramar Gaddafi . They settled in Manchester in a Libyan community that now numbers over 20,000 and had several children there including the bomber who was born in 1994. In 2011, after President Obama, along with the leaders of England and France, invaded Libya and killed Mr. Gaddafi, the Abedi’s returned to Libya but Salman then age 17 stayed in the UK with his younger brother Hashiin, and his older brother Ishmael. His sister Jomana returned to Libya with her parents. Jomana, who works at a Mosque in Libya, said that her brother was kind and loving and she congratulated him on entering paradise. Apparently the Religion of Peace rewards the murder of children with entry into paradise for the murderer. To me, living in the West, this all seems twisted, sick, and demented but to adherents of the Religion of Peace, I suppose, it makes perfect since. At the time of this recording, 14 people have been arrested as having been connected to the attack, including Salman’s younger brother Hashin who is being considered an accomplice, and his father in Libya who was described as a member of an Islamic extremist group. I remind you though, that killing unbelievers is not extreme in Islam, but is required by the Muslim Holy Book. The purpose of terrorism after all is to create terror and what better way to terrify a population than to attack its children. What better way to deliver the message, you can’t even protect your most vulnerable from us and we will conquer you all in time. To me this indicates that the goals of multiculturalism and diversity are higher on the UK priority scale than their children. The British media, especially the UK guardian, made much of the fact that Mr. Salman was born in Britain so immigration had nothing to do with it. The real enemy and the thing to be avoided at all costs, the media told us, is Islamaphobia, but does the fact that our bomber, Salman Abedi, was born in the UK make him a home grown terrorist. His father never left his extremist Islamic group even in Britain and the family didn’t assimilate to British life and in fact apparently hated the country that had taken in the parents. That is one of many problems with multiculturalism. It doesn’t create a “melting pot” but instead just moves a foreign culture from one place to another. Prime Minister, Theresa May, did take action though. She sent armed soldiers into the streets to patrol near British monuments and tourist attractions while uttering the same bland phrases such as hope, peace, etc. Maybe she should consider sending some of the soldiers to the border as border security. That would be a change I could believe in. In a population of about 65 million,

Darrell Castle presents an analysis of life in the violent Democrat cities of America.

Darrell Castle discusses Trump vs Comey, the Trump – Russia investigation, and what it all means for America. TRANSCRIPT Hello this is Darrell Castle with today’s podcast. Today is Friday, May 19, 2017, and today we will be discussing the global empire that used to be America, but is now just the United States or as some have taken to calling it “the deep state.” Every global empire has to have its secret police, and the United States is no exception. There are 16 different intelligence agencies all coming under the department of homeland security. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is one of those agencies. Its director is appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. The director of the FBI is, therefore, under the Executive branch and since the FBI is law enforcement, it also comes under the Department of Justice, making the FBI’s direct boss is the Attorney General of the United States who now is Jeff Sessions. Since it is one of the intelligence agencies the FBI is also responsible to the Director of National Security. The President is free to fire the Director of the FBI anytime he wants to, but he does so at his own peril. Why, because not even Presidents can mess with the secret police. They know everything about everybody and everyone in Washington knows it. People in Washington who have been there awhile are all terrified of the secret police that know all their secrets and can deliver them up to the justice system or ensure their electoral defeat anytime they get out of line. The FBI was formed in 1924 under the leadership of a Federal investigator named J. Edgar Hoover. Mr. Hoover made his reputation investigating those deemed “disloyal” during World War l. He ran the FBI from his appointment in 1924 until his death in 1972, so 48 years. During that time he built a revered agency that was admired by the American public because it was totally independent and was “untouchable.” In reality, the FBI was an investigative agency, so it investigated. Apparently, it investigated everything and everybody, utterly intimidating Washington. Who doesn’t have some secret that he would not want revealed. Those in Washington who served for many years had long dossiers of misdeeds all chronicled by the FBI and held by Mr. Hoover. Harry Truman, who had many famous run ins with Mr. Hoover once said, “we want no Gestapo or secret police. The FBI is tending in that direction—this must stop.” Many Presidents, if not all of them, wanted to fire Hoover but were intimidated by him, his popularity, and his dossiers. Both John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson (LBJ) had public disputes with him. I lived through those years and remember many of them. LBJ once famously said when deciding whether or not to fire Hoover “better to have him on the inside of the tent urinating out than on the outside of the tent urinating in.” Mr. Johnson used his own vernacular but I have to make this podcast acceptable to you. More recently Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer D-NY in early January of this year, so weeks before the inauguration, on the Rachel Maddow show said, “Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you”. Every one of both parties is afraid –and intimidated. President Trump has obviously had his problems with James B. Comey. Mr. Comey was appointed by Barack Hussein Obama on September 4, 2013 and served until fired by Donald Trump on May 9, 2017. When I heard that Trump had decided to let Comey continue after his inauguration I knew that was a mistake. He could have made a change just because he wanted to have his own people with him. Mr. Comey is not J. Edgar Hoover and he did not serve 48 years so firing him then would have been understandable and without controversy. Instead he foolishly let the security guard of the deep state ensconce himself even deeper into the furniture I don’t know if the things being said about President Trump are true or not.

Darrell Castle talks about why the 2017  presidential election in France was so important to Americans. PODCAST TRANSCRIPT Hello this is Darrell Castle with today’s pod cast. Today is Friday May 12, 2017 and on this pod cast we are going to be discussing the recent elections in France. Why was the election of a French President vitally important to Americans and to the entire world? I have had a fondness for France and the French people for a long time. When I think of the French people I don’t think about the ignorant ones in the man on the street pre-election interviews who say I’m voting for Macron because Le Pen is racist, xenophobic, homophobic, claustrophobic, hydrophobic, etc. Instead I think about the French officers I served with; I think about Bridget Bardot and Katherine Denueve. I think about the beauty and romance of Paris and the French countryside. It’s been a while since I’ve since France, too long in fact. I have not been there since the Muslim invasion. So Emmanuel Macron won and is the savior of the EU in its current form. Why wouldn’t he win? Liberal Rothchild banker, endorsed by the EU, endorsed by the bureaucrats in Brussels, by Barack Obama, and by the French ruling class his victory was assured. I read one comment on Face book that said “so one socialist defeats another socialist, who cares. So why should we care? In many ways Le Pen is even more socialist than Macron but she wanted to save and preserve the French Nation by controlling the French border and by leaving the Euro zone to go back to the French currency, the Franc. Macron, on the other hand prefers to bleed the French people on behalf of the European and German central banks. Even ISIS recognized her potential. An ISIS spokesman was quoted as saying “we don’t care who wins; if its Le Pen violence and riots will give us France and if Macron wins immigration will continue and either way we have France. For me, I wanted Le Pen to win because I wanted to see France defend itself. I wanted to see the French people get up off their knees and stop licking Muslim boots. If they were defeated they would at least go down fighting. Instead they chose submission. They bend their collective knees to Islam in the name of tolerance and inclusiveness. Emmanuel Macron will now attempt to put a parliamentary government together to govern France but it will be difficult for him because the French electorate seems very divided. Marine Le Pen says she is now retired from politics. She said she never wanted to be in politics she was just trying to save her country. From the number of abstentions and ruined ballots it appears that a parliamentary majority will be difficult for Macron to achieve. Marine Le Pen promised to secure France’s borders and to leave the European Union or at least set a referendum to vote on doing so had she won. Emmanuel Macron, on the other hand, is a globalist as I said, former Rothchild banker, who adamantly supports EU membership and is pro Islamist. He has been quoted as saying “there is no such thing as French culture”. “When I see an Algerian or Moroccan I see a Frenchman.” The vote in the runoff election was 66% for Macron and 34% for Le Pen. That is an increase in votes for Le Pen’s Party, Front National, from 22% in 2002 to 34% this time. It means though, that 66% of French voters want France to become a colony of North Africa and the Middle East. Isn’t it ironic that France, once a great empire, colonized many countries in Africa including Libya, Algeria, and Mali and now these countries are returning the favor. The globalists rejoice at Macron’s election because their foundation, i.e. the EU can continue. If Le Pen had won and France had left the EU, the entire house of cards would probably have crumbled. His first phone call after his victory was assured was to Angela Merkel, the Chancellor of Germany. Not to Le Pen, not to his staff but to Merkel. Their conversation was reportedly very warm and Mrs.

Darrell Castle and Cynthia Davis recently discussed how the Senate makes decisions on who to confirm and why Neil Gorsuch would be approved despite fears of a filibuster.

Darrell Castle recently returned to the airwaves with this interview on the Home Front program, hosted by former Missouri State Representative, Cynthia Davis. Darrell and Cynthia talk about President Trump’s wiretapping allegations, what the government already can do without a search warrant and the future of Obamacare.

https://vimeo.com/200606656

Darrell Castle discusses the effects of the United States' policy of invading Muslim countries, then inviting Islamic refugees to immigrate to the U.S. Recorded at the Constitution Party National Committee Meeting, December 9, 2016, Huntsville, Alabama.

Darrell Castle was recently a guest on the Home Front program, hosted by former Missouri State Representative, Cynthia Davis. Darrell reported on his recent Presidential campaign as he and Cynthia discussed what to expect from the next administration and where we must go from here.