Thersa Helm is one of the women who was abused by Jeffrey Epstein. She is also one of the most vocal when it comes to his associates getting away with their alleged crimes. Now, in the wake of the document dump she is once again speaking out.


In this episode, we hear from Theresa Helm about the document dump and how this new found interest in Epstein and his horrible crimes could catapult us closer to justice.


(commercial at 9:32)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:


I'm a Jeffrey Epstein Survivor. The Documents Are an Opportunity (newsweek.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

It might be a new year but it's the same old story from the legacy media when it comes to their pal Bill Clinton and his BFF Jeffrey Epstein. Instead of just leaning into the FACTS that have been revealed about Epstein and Clinton, they have to engage in whataboutism. Not only that, they, themselves, are engaging in the very behavior that they are accusing others of.

Get your rubber boots ready, there is plenty of BS to wade through.


(commercial at 8:57)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

Marjorie Taylor Greene ignores Trump ties to Epstein while slamming Clinton | The Independent

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

There are plenty of legit questions that surround what happened to Jeffrey Epstein while he was in custody in Manhattan and one of the favored techniques of the gate keepers of truth in the fourth estate, is to parrot, word for word what the DOJ and The IG reports tell us. The only problem with that is, there plenty of holes within those reports.


In this episode, Jeffrey Epstein's brother Mark is speaking out in the wake of the new document dump that is underway and according to him, the government has been less than helpful when it comes to information about his brothers death, and why he thinks that there is much more to the story.

(commercial at 9:31)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

Jeffrey Epstein's brother claims feds covering up death evidence (nypost.com)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The connections and ties between Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein are so obvious at this point that there is little doubt that the two of them were much closer than Clinton and his mouthpieces in the media would have us believe.


In this episode, we hear from another trafficked survivor of Epstein about how he flexed on her when they were aboard the 727 known as the Lolita Express about his great pal Bill Clinton and how Jane Doe 15 was sitting in BIll's favorite seat.


Meanwhile, the silence remains deafening in the vast majority of the legacy media about Bill Clinton and his long history with Jeffrey Epstein.

(commercial at 8:22)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

Jeffrey Epstein accuser claims she took Bill Clinton's seat on his plane | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

One of the most feared situations as a parent is that you will be in a position where you can't protect your child and for the parents of Jeffrey Epstein's survivors, those nightmares became a reality.


In this episode, we hear from Virginia Roberts father, Sky Roberts as he breaks down those early days when Virginia first met Epstein and Maxwell and when her abuse began at the hands of the demonic duo.

(commercial at 14:49)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

'I shook Epstein's hand and asked him what my daughter would be doing': Virginia Roberts's father describes dropping her off at paedophile's mansion, meeting 'despicable' Ghislaine... and blasts Prince Andrew for showing 'no remorse' | Daily Mail Online

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

According to newly released court documents, Virginia Roberts was paid 15 thousand dollars after Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell allegedly trafficked her to Prince Andrew.


The report falls in line with the literally hundreds of other similar reports out there, where Epstein and Maxwell attempted to pay their victims, so that later on down the road they could claim that it was nothing more than solicitation. Considering how well that strategy worked for him in Florida, is it any wonder he kept it up?



(commercial at 8:45)

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Jeffrey Epstein 'paid Virginia Giuffre $15K to have sex with Prince Andrew at 17,' latest bombshell docs claim | The Sun

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jesús Vicente Zambada Niebla, also known as "El Vicentillo," played a crucial role in providing the U.S. government with detailed information about the Sinaloa Cartel's operations after his arrest in 2009. His plea agreement included admissions of coordinating the transport of multi-ton cocaine shipments from Panama and Colombia to Mexico and distributing heroin in the U.S. In exchange for a reduced sentence, Zambada Niebla forfeited $1.37 billion in assets and provided extensive intelligence on the cartel, including its bribery of Mexican officials and logistical operations using various transport methods like aircraft, submarines, and tractor-trailers​.


His cooperation raised concerns about potential repercussions for the cartel, especially for his father, Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada, who assumed leadership after El Chapo's arrest. The information shared by El Vicentillo significantly impacted U.S. efforts to combat the cartel, leading to arrests and heightened security measures against drug trafficking activities. His cooperation also fueled speculation about the extent of the Zambada family's involvement in facilitating law enforcement actions against other cartel leaders ..



(commercial at 9:55)


to contact me:

[email protected]





source:

https://www.vice.com/en/article/88qgpk/sinaloa-cartel-leader-el-mayos-son-wants-a-deal-to-stay-in-the-us

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.

The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.

Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.

The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.


In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.


(commercial at 8:20)

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.

The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.

Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.

The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.


In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.


(commercial at 8:20)

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman Loera filed a motion for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33, arguing that his trial was compromised by juror misconduct. The motion cites a VICE News interview with an anonymous juror who claimed that jurors violated the judge’s instructions by following media coverage of the trial and discussing the case before deliberations. The juror revealed that several jurors had accessed news articles and tweets related to the trial on smart devices, and they discussed these articles among themselves despite the judge's explicit orders not to do so. The juror also admitted that jurors read about allegations of Guzman drugging and sexually abusing underage women, although they purportedly disregarded these claims during deliberations.

The defense argues that this misconduct resulted in an unfair trial, thus necessitating a new one. This claim focuses on the potential influence of external information on the jurors' impartiality and the possibility that pre-trial instructions were not adequately followed, thereby compromising the integrity of the trial.



(commercial at 5:58)

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

EL CHAPO: "MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL UPON AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING" - DocumentCloud

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.