It looks as though the one and only Adele Joan Gritton has risen from the ashes and apparently has taken to Reddit.  Let's read some of the comments from both Joan and the Free Kit Martin Warriors out there helping fight for his freedom.

Our opinion is just that.  Opinions are not facts.  We have a right to that opinion because Kit Martin fought for our first amendment rights to free speech.  All Joan fought for, in our opinion, was to take down a man that grew tired of the game. 

Emilio Corsetti joins the conversation as we debunk the funk.  The Leonard Scott Smith character is at it again but not without more questions.  

Everything on this podcast is for educational and content purposes.  

Our views and that of our guests are our individual opinions. 

Music provided by Soundstrype's Ian Kelowski - LIGHT THE WAY

All rights reserved.

Studies estimated that between 4 to 6 %.  In terms of real numbers meaning that an estimated 1 in 20 criminal cases result in a wrongful conviction.  With almost two million people in our jails and prisons that mean TENS OF THOUSANDS INCARCERATED PEOPLE WERE WRONGFULLY CONVICTED.

We will continue to ask the questions and by the way, they are getting harder to ask the longer Kit Martin is imprisoned.  He didn't commit these crimes.  He is 100% Innocent, and we will not stop until he is free.

Tori, one of Kit's twin sisters asks some great questions.  Stacey will read that letter from the Martin family and we will also go over some excerpts from the new book that will be released about this case.  I WILL RUIN YOU by Emilio Corsetti available through Wild Blue Press. 

https://wildbluepress.com/i-will-ruin-you-emilio-corsetti-iii-true-crime/

This whole fiasco can be summed up in two words.  Horse poop. 

We learn in this episode that the Injustice Industy is alive and well in Kentucky and something smells.

Emilio Corsetti has written the book about this case.   I WILL RUIN YOU - The Twisted Truth Behind the Kit Martin Murder Trial will hit shelves March 26th.  We asked Emilio to give us his Alternative Theory as to what actually happened in Pembroke that night according to the evidence.  This is a gripping episode, and a trigger warning is necessary as we speak candidly about a murder and moving bodies. Listener discretion is advised.

Everything here is for educational and content purposes.  

IMPORTANT CORRECTION:  James Matlock did not testify that he saw a man in a yellow shirt and blue jeans walking his dogs.  Only that he saw the man himself.  The dogs were with Kit Martin when he was checking out a car on the farm one day.  We stand corrected on this matter.  Emilio Corsetti is back on the FKMP to discuss an odd thing that happened when visiting Pembroke, KY recently.  He ran into a witness from the trial!

Do you remember James Matlock's testimony?  The man who came forward over 4 years after the crime, but conveniently 4 months before the trial.

Is it truthful testimony? Well decide for yourself.  

Why was James Matlock encouraged to testify? Could YOU remember exactly

This man with public arrest records longer than a green mile testifying that he

 emiliocorsetti.com to learn more about I WILL RUIN YOU, 

The Twisted Truth Behind the Kit Martin Murder Trial.  Hitting the market March 26th.   Pre order NOW and get a digital copy to help write reviews for Wild Blue Press' Release in March.   For the presale download price of $2.99 just hit the link below.

Amazon.com: I WILL RUIN YOU!: The Twisted Truth Behind The Kit Martin Murder Trial eBook : Corsetti III, Emilio : Kindle Store

Everything here is our opinion, and we would appreciate you taking a listen and sharing your opinions. We would love to hear from you.

Hosted by Crystal McKenzie and Stacey Stone.

Proceed with caution.  Contact:  [email protected]

Copyright Disclaimer: - Under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for FAIR USE for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of FAIR USE.

LISTENER DISCRETION IS ADVISED! Welcome to the Free Kit Martiin

We know after watching the travesty of a trial, you will have questions too.

Take a listen and share your opinions. We would love to

Copyright Disclaimer: - Under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for FAIR USE for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of FAIR USE.

We discuss it all in this podcast about the way the Kit Martin trial came about.  How does an innocent man get raked over the coals of the coalmining state?  IT apparently only took one hot blonde, a couple of bad cops, and the US Army to take him down, but they succeeded.

We discuss it here on Episode 13 Season 1 of the Free Kit Martin Podcast.  Thank you for listening.  As always listener discretion is advised.

Copyright Disclaimer: - Under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for FAIR USE for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of FAIR USE.

NOT one piece of evidence introduced in the trial leads us back to Christian Kit Martin. Not one.  Let's unpack it together. 

Listener discretion is advised:  If conversations about murder, guns, divorce, sex, domestic violence and alleged military corruption is something that triggers you, this is likely not the podcast for you. 

Copyright Disclaimer: - Under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for FAIR USE for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of FAIR USE.