
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Even before Donald Trump’s election, foreign policy thinkers were beginning to realize that American grand strategy had to change. After more than 15 years of war in Afghanistan and the Middle East, Americans’ enthusiasm for foreign adventures had expired and many believed that public support for traditional American leadership of the liberal international order had expired along with it. The big question was: What would come next?
During the third year of the Trump administration, the 2020 Democratic candidates have offered a range of arguments about what’s wrong with U.S. foreign policy today and where it should be headed. Some of these hew fairly close to the traditional, pre‐Trump approach, while others represent more significant departures from the status quo.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By Cato Institute4.5
115115 ratings
Even before Donald Trump’s election, foreign policy thinkers were beginning to realize that American grand strategy had to change. After more than 15 years of war in Afghanistan and the Middle East, Americans’ enthusiasm for foreign adventures had expired and many believed that public support for traditional American leadership of the liberal international order had expired along with it. The big question was: What would come next?
During the third year of the Trump administration, the 2020 Democratic candidates have offered a range of arguments about what’s wrong with U.S. foreign policy today and where it should be headed. Some of these hew fairly close to the traditional, pre‐Trump approach, while others represent more significant departures from the status quo.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

973 Listeners

2,836 Listeners

4,264 Listeners

2,451 Listeners

2,272 Listeners

693 Listeners

29 Listeners

1,509 Listeners

633 Listeners

987 Listeners

716 Listeners

90 Listeners

2,005 Listeners

740 Listeners

691 Listeners

1,070 Listeners

95 Listeners