
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Based on Podcast App listening data
Above you’ll find my conversation with University of San Francisco law professor Lara Bazelon. She specializes in criminal law and has won exoneration for wrongfully convicted incarcerated people. We discuss systemic racism in the criminal justice system and debate the pros and cons of various reform efforts. We go into the details of Yutico Briley’s wrongful conviction case in which Lara and her sister Emily were involved (you can read Emily’s piece about it here). Then we shift gears and discuss the challenges of writing fiction. We talk about Lara’s absorbing new novel A Good Mother and my memoir-in-progress. These are pretty deep waters, as we reflect on how our writing has forced us to confront some hard questions about our roles as professionals and parents.
As always, I’m interested in your thoughts! Let me know in the comments!
This post is free and available to the public. To receive early access to TGS episodes, Q&As, and other exclusive content and benefits, click below.
0:00 How Glenn and Lara each approach systemic racism
6:46 Lara: The Yutico Briley case exposes the roots of systemic racism
17:32 Trying to understand the equities and inequities of crime and punishment
28:20 The differing perspectives on justice involved in the Briley case
34:44 Are progressive criminal justice policies having an impact?
46:16 Lara's new novel, A Good Mother
54:37 Glenn and Lara's experiences of parenthood
1:01:08 Why Glenn really left Harvard's economics department
1:05:16 Glenn's rocky road as a father
Links
Bari Weiss’ forum on systemic racism
Glenn’s book, Race, Incarceration, and American Values
Glenn’s “intellectual obituary” of James Q. Wilson
Lara’s novel, A Good Mother
This week John and I have something a little different for you: An interview with Wall Street Journal columnist and Manhattan Institute Senior Fellow Jason Riley about his recent book, Maverick: A Biography of Thomas Sowell. We discuss Sowell's ideas, their influence, and his place within the pantheon of American (and black America), intellectuals. Among his innumerable contributions, Sowell's books—especially A Conflict of Visions, Knowledge and Decisions, and Basic Economics—are a particular focus of this wide-ranging conversation. We also get into a broader discussion about black intellectuals, conservatism, and the academy.
And don’t worry, Substack subscribers, John and I will be posting our monthly Q&A later this week. Stay tuned!
As always, I’m curious to know what you think. Let me know here and on Discord.
0:00 Intro
1:10 Comparing the legacies of Thomas Sowell and George Schuyler
5:27 Making the case for Sowell’s significance
16:55 The task of the popularizer
23:55 Why Sowell’s book A Conflict of Visions is important
31:15 The norm of inter-group disparity
40:47 What happened to Glenn’s generation of heterodox Black intellectuals?
50:12 Why it’s hard to be a conservative in academia
59:54 Where is the left-wing critique of progressive racial politics?
Links
Jason’s book, Maverick: A Biography of Thomas Sowell
Sowell’s book, A Conflict of Visions: Ideological Origins of Political Struggle
Matt Taibbi and Katie Halper's talk with Adolph Reed
Here is my conversation with NYU law professor Richard Epstein. In this conversation, Richard talks about his involvement with a legal action aimed at stopping construction on the currently planned site of the Obama Presidential Center in Chicago. We discuss the legal issues. We also talk about critical race theory—its origins in the legal academy of the 1970s and 80s, its foundational ideas, its impact on American education, and whether it should be banned by law. We conclude with Richard, who urged Trump to resign in January 2017(!), decrying what he sees as a lack of "comity" on the part of the Biden administration.
I hope you enjoy the conversation! As always, I’m curious to know what you think. Let me know here and on Discord.
0:00 Why Richard is trying to stop the construction of the Obama Presidential Center on its present site
10:20 Richard's stymied attempt to stop alterations to Chicago's Soldiers Field
15:12 Raising questions about the OPC's environmental impact
31:16 Richard's account of critical race theory
39:35 A legal history of racial redress in the US
48:59 Richard: Biden exhibits less comity than Trump did
Here is my latest conversation with John McWhorter. We begin with a review of our respective academic careers and how being black has affected our work. We also assess the recent involvement of Al Sharpton and Benjamin Crump in the case of a white Arkansas man who was shot dead in June, under suspicious circumstances, by a police officer during a traffic stop. We close with an extended discussion of critical race theory, which we define carefully and evaluate thoroughly. We agree that CRT should not be banned by law, but we endorse the efforts of parents to weigh-in with their local schools against it.
And, in case you haven’t seen it, we are now taking questions for our next Q&A. Let us know what’s on your mind!
0:00 John McWhorter, master of his craft
5:18 Is John a “black linguist”? Is Glenn a “black economist”?
13:45 Al Sharpton and Benjamin Crump address police violence against white victims
24:25 What we talk about when we talk about CRT
35:35 Is the CRT debate comparable to other debates in education?
43:43 Glenn: It is tyrannical to ban the teaching of CRT
Today I’m posting something a little different than normal. This is a conversation with NYU political scientist Larry Mead. It’s part of his series “Culture and Poverty,” and he’s generously allowed me to repost it here at The Glenn Show. We discuss some ideas from Larry’s book, Burdens of Freedom: Cultural Difference and American Power. Larry argues, among other things, that one of the major distinctions between “Western” and “non-Western” cultures is the role of individualism. Larry sees Western culture—as exemplified by the US—as predominately individualist in its orientation. When immigrants from non-Western cultures struggle to assimilate, he argues, it’s often because they have problems adjusting to this individualist orientation.
There are certainly merits to this argument. But in this discussion, I push back on Larry’s description of African American culture as basically non-Western. This, it seems to me, ignores a number of important facts about African American social and political history after the Civil War. It’s a lively back and forth, and I’m curious what you think.
0:00 Intro
2:04 Larry's view of Western and non-Western culture
5:32 Is African American culture "non-Western"?
14:57 Larry: "Freedom is a threat" to Black and Latino families
24:08 African American individualism after emancipation
36:00 The "paradox" of Asian academic success
48:26 What are the origins of European political development?
From the publisher's feed
Ranked by our users in the last 21 days