The Human Maturity Podcast

By request, we go deeper into spacer types, the holy trinity of soul species, enneagram type, and spacer type and how they operate together, and for illustration purposes and fun, assigning types to assorted celebrities.

Thanks for listening.

Today, the fascinating and misunderstood subject of “dark energies.” Are there such things as demonic possessions and evil, parasitic influences from beyond? What are the governing dynamics of energetic predation of different kinds and how can you protect yourself from it? Will Venezuela have a second Christmas in December?

Thanks for listening.

With the U.S. presidential election less than two months away, we offer some spiritual meta on politics today. How does one relate to politics spiritually? Why does it seem like the same people run the world everywhere and nothing ever changes? What soul species are drawn to government and why? And perhaps most importantly, what are the psychospiritual motives for a world leader to move a holiday?

Thanks for listening.

The nature and usefulness of identity is our topic today. Does the soul have an identity between lives? Is there such a thing as healthy conditioning? How is Yin Divinity affecting the fragility of identity and the emergence of soul? We also discuss the challenge of relating to Edenity in a testing mode that requires neither belief nor disbelief, a critical groove to find in the beginning. Lastly, Stace offers to teach a course on the premises of Edenity. If you’re interested, you can email him through edenity.org.

Thanks for listening,

We complete this recent, slightly interrupted series on Sagehood today with an unapologetic (see what I did there) comparison of various forms of eastern transcendental metaphysics and Edenity’s own Sagehood dharma. Topics include Edenity’s assertion of what we call the “pre-dual” versus the nondual, a key difference between awakening in men and women, and a possible future for enlightenment dharma that goes deeper than going upstream to just mind.

Thanks for listening.

It’s been four months since we recorded and we are "forward." Thank you for your patience. Stace and I both were traveling at different times, I got Covid at one point, and various other things got in the way, but we are forging onward and it felt really great to record this one.

Not only did you have to wait four months for us to complete the series on Sagehood that we began, but we’re pushing that off a week with an emergent topic brought to me via email that I thought would be good to address while it was hot. That topic is a very old question of “How arrogant is it to say what we say and how we say it?” We’re well aware of how off-putting our conversations can be to some people and this is what we have to say about it in terms of gold and green. 

Thanks for listening.

Today, we continue with part two of a Sagehood series which is surely one of my favorite episodes thus far. This one was really profound for me personally and I hope it’s as powerful for you as well but you’ll have to pay close attention as the distinctions are very subtle. We talk about what the Buddha actually taught compared to other enlightenment teachings, and then compare all of that to Edenity’s version of Sagehood. This is a realm where distinctions go to die in experience, but the importance of the initial assumptions and how they influence where you arrive in awakening are very much alive regardless.

Thanks for listening.

Today, we begin a Sagehood series featuring four categories for enlightenment paths which make sense of an often confusing world of sagely teachings that aren’t metaphysically rigorous by our standards. We start by addressing the challenge of language from a Sagehood perspective and revisiting the issue of subjective vs. objective reality as context for this topic. 

Thanks for listening

Today, we complete the series on the thirteen principles of Personhood with more on codependence, compromise vs. negotiation, relatedness as a means to heal the fear of intimacy, how symmetrical issues work in romantic couples, and of course, much more.

Today, we warm up with why Edenity work doesn’t require integration, but digestion and how that’s different. We then continue our conversation from last time about Edenity’s challenge of traditional therapeutic boundaries and go on to cover the hugely significant resolution of revelatory vs. relative morality, and finish with a discussion of the universality of codependence.

Thanks for listening.