The Human Maturity Podcast

Today, we continue our series on the thirteen fundamental assumptions of Personhood dharma in Edenity. We complete our deconstruction of altruism and other selflessness illusions and move onto a criticism of traditional therapist-client boundaries as impedimentary to real healing, and finish with the hugely philosophically important discovery of an emotive-based morality which we don’t complete until the next episode, so be sure to listen to 91 as well.

Thanks for listening.

Today, we continue our series on the thirteen fundamental assumptions of Personhood dharma in Edenity. We discuss the misguided pursuit of happiness, what substance abuse is really about, the nature of authentic self-love, and the false notions of altruism, sacrifice, and unconditional love.

Thanks for listening.HOS

Today, we begin discussion of the thirteen assumptions that Edenity’s Personhood dhama is based on. We’ve touched upon these ideas before but not gone through them in this more structured and thorough way. In this episode, we cover the first five which I’ll generally summarize: that we’re emotive being first, the four elements of human behavior, that there’s no such thing as a negative emotion, the need we have to feel felt as children, and the architecture of the emotional body.

Thanks for listening.

Today: the split between humanity and Divinity, the nature of conditioning, the ramifications of the self as sacred and essentially emotive, and of course, much more.

Thanks for listening.

Today: how an allegedly effeminate depiction of Jesus draws yet another display of Christian contradictions and flawed metaphysics, the importance of understanding religion as pre-psychological, and how and why every religion ends up being the opposite of what its founder intended.

Thanks for listening.

Today, chakras in the context of energy as downstream of essential emotivity, a revised treatment of the chakral system, chakral breathing techniques you can try, and much more.

Thanks for listening.

Hi, it’s Josef and thanks for listening to The Heart of Soul Podcast. You have to listen to the very end of this one to see how Stace magically ties together time travel, simulation theory, and the abortion issue. It’s a meta piece de resistance without any meaning in content for why they go together. Rabbit holes include the limits of brain-based consciousness models, the diagnostic delusions in western medicine, and why it might be good for you (and not just me) to be so frustrated with bad customer service that it makes you cry. 

Thanks for listening.

We’re back after the holidays and wasting no time deconstructing compensatory mainstream psychological tools made by and for unconscious protectors. Today, we focus on the domain of coping and spiritualized self-regulation and how it enables people to stay immature, and can harm children as well.

Thanks for listening.

Today, the secret to understanding everything. Finally, the answers you’ve been looking for! Of course, understanding alone won’t lead to fulfillment and questions are far more important than answers, but our topic today, the metaphysics of metaphysics will help you quite a lot if you can learn to see reality through this lens.

Also, we’re taking a break from recording at least for the rest of December. Stace and I both need some time off, but rest assured there’s plenty more to come. If you’re jonesing for a podcast, I do have another one called “Manage to Engage” that has some relevant crossover with Edenity, especially the later episodes. That podcast is more about the application of Edenity to the business world, which is always a fun tightrope to walk. There’s also a fair amount of pure zen sprinkled in there from that phase of my life. If you search for my name, Josef Shapiro, you’ll find Manage To Engage quite easily. 

Until next time, happy all-the-days, and we look forward to reconnecting in 2024. Thanks so much for listening!

What if your heart were not nearly as open as you think? What if most of what we call emotions are actually superficial, downstream expressions of it? What if the way we relate to love, as something you give to or pour on another, is actually inaccurate? What if there were a way to open your heart so much you could barely stand it for a while, because that’s how closed it currently is relative to what could be?

Thanks for listening.